PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DOCUMENTATION”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: results of a two-year study.

OBJECTIVES: The documentation of the nursing process is an important but often neglected part of clinical documentation. Paper-based systems have been introduced to support nursing process documentation. Frequently, however, problems such as low quality of documentation are reported. It is unclear whether computer-based documentation systems can reduce these problems and which factors influence their acceptance by users. DESIGN: We introduced a computer-based nursing documentation system on four wards of the University Hospitals of Heidelberg and systematically evaluated its preconditions and its effects in a pretest-posttest intervention study. For the analysis of user acceptance, we concentrated on subjective data drawn from questionnaires and interviews. MEASUREMENTS: A questionnaire was developed using items from published questionnaires and items that had to be developed for the special purpose of this study. RESULTS: The quantitative results point to two factors influencing the acceptance of a new computer-based documentation system: the previous acceptance of the nursing process and the previous amount of self-confidence when using computers. On one ward, the diverse acceptance scores heavily declined after the introduction of the nursing documentation system. Explorative qualitative analysis on this ward points to further success factors of computer-based nursing documentation systems. CONCLUSION: Our results can be used to assist the planning and introduction of computer-based nursing documentation systems. They demonstrate the importance of computer experience and acceptance of the nursing process on a ward but also point to other factors such as the fit between nursing workflow and the functionality of a nursing documentation system.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2001

Intranet-based quality improvement documentation at the Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System.

The Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service of the Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System is inspected biannually by the College of American Pathologists (CAP). As of the year 2000, all documentation in the Anatomic Pathology Section is available to all staff through the VA Intranet. Signed, supporting paper documents are on file in the office of the department chair. For the year 2000 CAP inspection, inspectors conducted their document review by use of these Web-based documents, in which each CAP question had a hyperlink to the corresponding section of the procedure manual. Thus inspectors were able to locate the documents relevant to each question quickly and efficiently. The procedure manuals consist of 87 procedures for surgical pathology, 52 procedures for cytopathology, and 25 procedures for autopsy pathology. Each CAP question requiring documentation had from one to three hyperlinks to the corresponding section of the procedure manual. Intranet documentation allows for easier sharing among decentralized institutions and for centralized updates of the laboratory documentation. These documents can be upgraded to allow for multimedia presentations, including text search for key words, hyperlinks to other documents, and images, audio, and video. Use of Web-based documents can improve the efficiency of the inspection process.

Databases, Factual↗
PubMed1999

[Quality documentation with an Anaesthesia Information Management System (AIMS)].

OBJECTIVE: In 1994 the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine of the Justus Liebig University of Giessen decided to implement an Anaesthesia Information Management System (AIMS) to replace the previous hand-written documentation on paper. From 1997 until the end of 1998 the data sets of 41,393 anaesthesia procedures were recorded with the help of computers and imported into a data bank. Individual aspects and results of this data pool are presented under the aspect of how the system in its present form is able to guarantee documentation of quality according to the requirements of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI). METHODS: Since 1997 information on all anaesthesia procedures has been documented "online" with the anaesthesia documentation software NarkoData 4 (ProLogic GmbH, Erkrath). The data sets have been stored in a relational data bank (Oracle Corporation) and statistically processed with the help of the SQL-based program Voyant (Brossco Systems, Espoo, Finland). As an example of two adverse perioperative events (AVB) we compared incidences of "hypotension" and "nausea/vomiting", recorded by staff members into the AIMS, with the incidence of comparable events that were recorded with the help of online data during anaesthesia procedures, such as blood pressure and drug application. Since 1998 data recording has been revised constantly in department meetings; advanced training has been given. The results have been analysed critically. RESULTS: In 1997 the incidence of adverse perioperative events entered manually into the system was 3.6% (grade III and higher 0.9%) and increased during 1998 to 22.2% (grade III and higher 1.9%). The frequency of anaesthesia procedures with manually documented AVBs was significantly below the incidence (determined with the help of online data) of comparable events: "hypotension" (1.8% vs. 8.5%) and "nausea/vomiting" (4.9% vs. 8.3%). CONCLUSION: The current documentation of AVBs in almost any hospital is incomplete. In contrast to the hand-written procedure, the AIMS provides recorded data for evaluation and guarantees more detailed and complete quality documentation. In addition, the effort needed for documentation is reduced. Whether these data sets really describe and measure quality or not has to be evaluated. In addition it has to be considered whether different requirements (such as automatic AVB recognition for an AIMS) are advantageous for quality documentation regarding the data raster and the AVB recognition, with respect to different documentation procedures.

Anesthesia↗
PubMed2005

Orientation to nutrition care process standards improves nutrition care documentation by nutrition practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: To compare documentation of two groups of clinical nutrition practitioners for evidence of the nutrition care process. DESIGN: This study used a comparative descriptive design. A retrospective chart review was conducted on all nutrition documentation in closed patient records. Documentation of two groups of nutrition practitioners (institution A=practitioners who received initial orientation and routine reinforcement in use of nutrition care process standards; institution B=practitioners who received orientation in use of a further assessment and medical nutrition therapy intervention procedure) was compared for evidence of a six-step nutrition care process. SAMPLE/SETTING: The sample consisted of randomly selected patient records (N=60). A total of 15 oncology and 15 chronic renal failure patient records from each of two Midwestern tertiary-care hospitals were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were number of nutrition care process steps documented, appropriate relationships among documented steps in the nutrition care process, and the number of complete, incomplete, and interrupted chains. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Two-sample t tests and chi(2) analyses were used. RESULTS: Nutrition practitioners at institution A documented approximately three times as many nutrition care process steps per patient per chain that demonstrated appropriate relationships as did nutrition practitioners at institution B (2.69+/-1.15 and 0.80+/-0.62, respectively [mean+/-standard deviation]) (P<.001). There were no outcome judgments related to goals documented in chains at either institution and because of this there were no completed nutrition care process chains at either institution. CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition practitioners with orientation to nutrition care process standards documented more related nutrition care process steps than practitioners without this orientation. Providing nutrition practitioners with ongoing education and clinical experiences in use and documentation of the nutrition care process and a standardized language may be indicated to increase the number of completed nutrition care process chains and improve documentation of nutrition care and patient outcomes.

Chi-Square Distribution↗
PubMed1998

Using a hospitalwide performance improvement process for patient education documentation.

BACKGROUND: Decreases in length of hospital stay have increased pressure on staff to provide appropriate patient education. A hospitalwide continuous quality improvement (CQI) program was implemented to improve patient education documentation at Raritan Bay Medical Center (RBMC; Perth Amboy, NJ). IMPROVING THE PATIENT EDUCATION DOCUMENTATION PROCESS: In March 1995 the patient education committee was given the responsibility to develop a CQI program to improve documentation of patient education. Patient interviews revealed that assessment of patients' initial knowledge was inadequate and goal setting was omitted. The committee developed generic and disease-specific patient education documentation forms for educational assessment and patient education. The patient chart was reconfigured to include a central location for patient education. RESULTS: A review of almost 900 patient records established that the percentage of records on which patient education was documented had improved from 41% in summer 1995 to 93% in fall 1996, with an improvement across all disciplines. A follow-up review in fall 1997 of 136 randomly chosen records indicated a slight decrease in rate of documentation of content areas, although nursing services and nutritional care continued to maintain their patient documentation education at a rate of > or = 90%. DISCUSSION: Factors such as providing continuous feedback on patient education documentation performance to all nursing units and disciplines involved, developing additional disease-specific education assessment plans/documentation tools through an interdisciplinary process, and improving the data collection tool after each measurement period all contributed to improved patient education documentation. CONCLUSIONS: Patient education is now truly integrated at RBMC, with every pertinent discipline involved in decision making throughout the process of continuously improving the patient education process and documentation.

Documentation↗
PubMed2004

The effect of a VIPS implementation programme on nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards documentation.

The Copenhagen University Hospital decided to adhere to the standards of the Joint Commission of International Accreditation in 2000. These standards require systematic assessment of patient care needs and include the use of written nursing care plans. In order to meet these standards, the hospital management decided to introduce the Swedish VIPS model, which is a model designed to structure nursing documentation (VIPS is an acronym for well-being, integrity, prevention and safety). The present study explores the nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards documentation and addresses the research questions: (a) what are the nurses' attitudes towards documentation of nursing care? and (b) do nurses have sufficient knowledge of the documentation system to systematically document their patient assessment and clinical decisions? The research design was prospective, comparative, and quasi-experimental (nonrandomized), including a study group (n=72) and a control group (n=57). A questionnaire was used to compare nurses' self-evaluated attitudes towards documentation, and a multiple-choice test was given in order to assess nurses' knowledge of the documentation system. The study group participated in a special implementation programme (response rate 82%), while the control group attended the regular 3-day documentation course at the hospital (response rate 79%). The study showed that the two groups responded similarly, but the nurses in the study group were significantly stronger in their conviction that they had the knowledge to make care plans and that they routinely made them. The study group demonstrated slightly less motivation than the control group, while the two groups shared a positive attitude towards nursing documentation. The study group did consistently better on the knowledge tests. The findings show that the implementation programme had a positive impact on nursing documentation, and that the VIPS model increased the nurses' understanding of the nursing process.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Impact of a statewide trauma system on rural emergency department patient assessment documentation. OHSU Rural Trauma Research Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of rural ED patient assessment documentation with state trauma system implementation, hospital trauma categorization level (i.e., Level-3 vs Level-4), injury diagnosis, and patient demographics. METHODS: A pre- vs post-system implementation (historical control) analysis of trauma documentation was performed using a sample of rural ED trauma patients from 4 Level-3 and 5 Level-4 trauma hospitals. The medical records of patients with specific index diagnoses in 4 anatomic regions (head, chest, liver/spleen, and femur/open-tibia) were reviewed for 3-year periods before statewide trauma system implementation and after hospital categorization. Vital sign, % inspired O2, and O2 saturation determinations were identified relative to the first and the last vital signs documented on the ED record. If not documented in the medical chart within 5 minutes of the first or last ED vital sign assessment, these measurements were considered missing. Separately, neurologic documentation (initial and final) also was sought for patients meeting criteria for an index head injury. RESULTS: Of 1,057 patients entered into the database, 532 were evaluated during the pre-system period and 525 were evaluated during the post-system period. Overall, 47% had a head injury, 34% had a chest injury, 23% had a femur/open-tibia injury, and 12% had a spleen/liver injury. There were 142 (13%) patients with an injury in > 1 index area. Except for initial systolic blood pressure, documentation of all other initial and final patient vital signs increased significantly (p < 0.05). Documentation of the Glasgow Coma Scale score (initial and final; p = 0.0001) and a final pupil examination on head-injured patients (p = 0.025) also increased. The effects of hospital level, injury diagnosis, and patient demographics on documentation rate were minimal. CONCLUSION: The study found overall improved ED documentation of trauma patient status in association with implementation of a statewide trauma system. This improvement in documentation suggests an enhanced process of care with trauma system participation.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Documentation of patient care services in a community pharmacy setting.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the types of patient care documentation systems currently being used by community pharmacists and determine the preferred characteristics of an ideal patient care documentation system. DESIGN: Mailed survey. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: One pharmacist from each of 125 targeted community pharmacies. INTERVENTION: Survey mailed in February 2003, followed by a second mailing to nonrespondents in March 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to survey items about (1) patient care services provided at the pharmacy, (2) characteristics of the current documentation system, and (3) characteristics of an ideal documentation system. RESULTS: A total of 48 usable responses were received from 106 pharmacies to which surveys were delivered (45.3%). Independent pharmacies accounted for 50% of survey respondents. More than 80% of respondents were providing patient screening or management services associated with a chronic disease such as diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. Approximately 54% of the pharmacists were using a paper documentation system. However, challenges identified with a paper system included documentation time, retrieval of patient data, tracking patient outcomes, and storage. Respondents indicated that an ideal documentation system would be comprehensive, easy and efficient to use, and affordable. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists recognize the importance of documenting patient care services. While the majority of respondents are using paper charts to document patient care services, computerized systems appear to offer advantages over paper charts. This information offers community pharmacists a summary of previous experiences and a starting point when trying to identify or modify a documentation system that would better meet the pharmacies' needs.

Community Pharmacy Services↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Documentation and coding of medical records in a tertiary care center: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Since the medical record is the major source of health information, it is necessary to maintain accurate, comprehensive and properly coded patient data. We reviewed 300 medical records from patients at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, representing four departments (medicine, surgery, pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology). METHODS: The records were audited following the guidelines of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) for accuracy and completeness of documentation and coding of primary and secondary diagnoses and procedures performed. RESULTS: Of 1051 items abstracted, 876 (83.3%) were accurately documented, 41 (3.9%) were inaccurately documented, and 134 (12.7%) were not documented. Of the items abstracted, 736 (70%) were assigned a correct code, 110 (10.5%) were assigned an incorrect code, and 205 (19.5%) were not coded. More items classified as accurately documented were coded correctly (71.1%) than items inaccurately documented (49.7%) (P < 0.0001). The difference in comprehensiveness of documentation, which reflects physician performance, was not statistically significant among the four departments (P value < 0.234). The difference in the accuracy of coding, which reflects coder performance, was statistically significant (P value < 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Only 60% of the audited records met the benchmark for good quality medical records with regards to documentation and coding. A positive correlation between the accurate documentation and correct coding was noted, which supports the conclusion that high quality documentation enhances coding accuracy. These data, although encouraging, suggest room for improvement, which can be achieved through the collaboration of clinicians, who have extensive clinical experience, and coding professionals, who have comprehensive classification system expertise.

Documentation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Digitization of medical documents: an X-Windows application for fast scanning.

This paper deals with digitization, using a commercial scanner, of medical documents as still images for introduction into a computer-based Information System. Document management involves storing, editing and transmission. This task has usually been approached from the perspective of the difficulties posed by radiologic images because of their indisputable qualitative and quantitative significance. However, healthcare activities require the management of many other types of documents and involve the requirements of numerous users. One key to document management will be the availability of a digitizer to deal with the greatest possible number of different types of documents. This paper describes the relevant aspects of documents and the technical specifications that digitizers must fulfill. The concept of document type is introduced as the ideal set of digitizing parameters for a given document. The use of document type parameters can drastically reduce the time the user spends in scanning sessions. Presentation is made of an application based on Unix, X-Windows and OSF/Motif, with a GPIB interface, implemented around the document type concept. Finally, the results of the evaluation of the application are presented, focusing on the user interface, as well as on the viewing of color images in an X-Windows environment and the use of lossy algorithms in the compression of medical images.

Database Management Systems↗
PubMed2006

Discursive practices in the documentation of patient assessments.

AIM: This paper reports a study analysing the various functions of nurses' documentation of patient assessments. BACKGROUND: Modes of documentation have received much attention in the nursing press since the integration of the nursing process and nursing models. Previous research has shown that current documentation practices do not consistently promote effective communication and evaluation of patient care. A recent systematic review found no evidence that any particular system of documentation improved this situation. However, nurses' documentation serves not only to communicate information to others, but also has a political function as a presentation of what is important and ethically 'right' to report. METHOD: A Foucauldian approach to discourse analysis was used to analyse 45 patient records. FINDINGS: The findings indicate that nurses employ three discernible discursive practices in the documentation of patient assessments: medical, nursing and informal. Each practice has an effect on the presentation of nursing in the documentation. Because of the complex interplay between these practices, nurses present themselves as aligned with the medical profession, as distinct and professional, and as informal in their descriptions of non-biological information. The use of these practices appears to be motivated by the type of information being reporting. CONCLUSION: Existing literature highlights the functional aspects of nursing documentation. In contrast, this paper explores the way in which nurses, through their documentation, constitute themselves and the nursing profession. In this way, nursing documentation is viewed as a social practice and a conduit through which particular power effects are produced and reproduced, rather than simply a matter of, for example, knowledge, individual choice or good practice.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1990

The relationship of attitude, subjective norm, and behavioral intent to the documentation behavior of nurses.

Ajzen and Fishbein's theory of reasoned action was used to assess the relationship of nurses' attitude, subjective norm, and behavioral intention to their documentation behavior. Attitudes, subjective norms, and behavioral intentions toward documentation were elicited from 108 staff nurses. Documentation behavior was based on what should be documented in any hospitalized patient's chart during a shift. This exploratory model was analyzed with LISREL VI. The overall fit of the final model to the data was good, as judged by a chi-square (df = 7, p = .845). The total coefficient of determination for the structural equation was .461. Attitude toward documentation did not relate significantly to intention to document optimally. Subjective norm did have a significant effect on behavioral intent. Attitude and subjective norm accounted for 46.1% of the variance in behavioral intent. Behavioral intent had a significant effect on documentation behavior, accounting for 15.2% of the variance. It appears that subjective norm, which is the influence of others, is what directs the intention to document and thus relates to subsequent documentation. Recommendations for practice include the communication of high ideals and expectations of important others to the staff nurse in order to improve the quality of documentation.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2000

[Using an anesthesia information management system (AIMS) for documentation in a day care unit for ambulatory surgery].

UNLABELLED: From January 1997 until June 1999, the complete durations of stay of 3152 outpatients were entered into a computerized documentation system. The scope of the data entry went from patient admission to patient release. The objective was to determine the usefulness of the anaesthesia information management system (AIMS) in producing complete and high-quality documentation in the field of outpatient operations. Some aspects and results from routine work are presented here. METHOD: The system was installed in eight bedside computers, in addition to a further client connected to the existing AIMS via Ethernet. Patient medical courses were documented both preoperatively and postoperatively in outpatient bedsides until their discharge or admission. The online documentation software NarkoData (Version 4, Imeso GmbH, Hüttenberg, Germany) was used to document and store patient data in a database. This program contains all relevant information concerning the course of anaesthesia and outpatient duration of stay, including application of drugs, vital signs, observation times, and medical findings as well as the data sets of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI), ICD, and ICPM. Data was analyzed by exporting from the database into a statistical program using "structured query language." RESULTS: Data sets of 3152 outpatients were entered into the online documentation software. Most (54.2%) of the ambulatory surgical procedures were performed by the Department of Traumatology. General Surgery followed with 16.0%, and Urology managed 9.5% of the cases. The most frequent ambulatory surgical procedures were: diagnostic arthroscopy (923, 31.2%), removal of osteosynthetic material (410, 13.8%), and circumcision (250, 8.4%). Anesthesia procedures consisted of inhalative (38.6%, n = 1218) and intravenous anesthesia (IVA) (29.9%, n = 938). In 22.6% (713) of the cases, regional anaesthesia was performed. The average postoperative observation time was 289.2 +/- 140.1 minutes. One hundred sixty-nine patients (5.4%) were unexpectedly admitted to overnight care. The decision to admit patients to normal wards took place within the first 3 postoperative hours in 51.9% of the cases. CONCLUSION: The AIMS described above is sufficient in documenting the entire care process of patients in a day care unit. Integration into the existing AIMS was an important prerequisite for the integrity of the documentation chain. This allowed for a sensitive communication with other clinical data processing systems. The quality of documentation and flow of information at the workplaces in the day care unit were increased, similarly to other anaesthesiological workplaces in the hospital. Medical and administrative data and information for analyses of clinical processes are possible with such tools.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to describe a paper-based, template-driven and an electronic medical record used for capturing emergency care clinical information and to compare the accuracy of these documentation systems for coding patient encounters using the American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology-2004 (AMA CPT-2004) evaluation and management codes intended for provider reimbursement. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional study of 4-consecutive-day samples of ED patient encounter records from 2 similar community hospitals was done. For clinical documentation, hospital A uses an electronic medical record, whereas hospital B uses a paper-based template-driven record. Using a simple analytic model, expert coders A and B, respectively, coded the records from hospitals A and B for completeness. First, power analysis determined the acceptability of the patient record sample sizes (1 - beta = .90 at 1% significance level), and the frequency of AMA CPT-2004 primary evaluation and management codes 99281 through 99285 was calculated. Second, the completeness discrepancy rates for hospitals A and B were compared to determine the accuracy of both the paper-based, template-driven record and the electronic medical record in documenting and representing the clinical encounter. Third, interrater reliability between expert coders A and B was calculated to assess the level of agreement between each expert coder in determining the completeness discrepancy rates between hospitals A and B. Finally, the frequency of primary evaluation and management codes was analyzed to determine if there was a statistically significant difference between the paper-based, template-driven record and the electronic medical record representation of the clinical information, and if that difference could be attributable to the differing clinical documentation systems used in hospitals A and B. RESULTS: First, descriptive display demonstrated a difference in the frequency of the primary evaluation and management codes 99283 and 99284 within hospital A (expert coder A assessment, 36.1% vs 39.1%; expert coder B assessment, 36.6% vs 38.7%) and hospital B (expert coder A assessment, 47.8% vs 21.9%; expert coder B assessment, 48.6% vs 21.4%) was noted with the median, primary evaluation, and management code for hospital A of 99284 and the median, primary evaluation, and management code for hospital B of 99283. Second, Fisher exact test compared the completeness discrepancy rates between hospitals A and B as assessed by each expert coder and demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the completeness discrepancy rates (accuracy) between the paper-based, template-driven record and the electronic medical record documentation and coding system when assessed by either expert coder A (P = .370) or expert coder B (P = .819). Third, interrater reliability between expert coders A and B was evaluated using Cohen's kappa statistic. When evaluated both individually and jointly with respect to hospitals A and B, expert coders A and B had a good strength of agreement in their assessments of the accuracy of the documentation and coding system for hospital A (kappa = 0.6200) and hospital B (kappa = 0.6906) as well as for both hospitals evaluated together (kappa = 0.6616). Finally, interhospital differences in the frequency of primary evaluation and management codes were evaluated using Pearson chi(2) test with 3 df. The results for expert coder A (chi(2) = 47.4160; P < .001) and expert coder B (chi(2) = 46.5946; P < .001) recognize that there is a statistically significant degree of difference between hospitals A and B in the frequency distribution of primary evaluation and management codes, probably because of the dispersion of codes 99283 and 99284. CONCLUSIONS: A keystroke-driven, electronic medical record that resides on a knowledge platform that incorporates a clinical structured terminology, administrative coding schemata, AMA CPT-2004 codes and uses object-oriented, open-ended, branching chain clinical algorithms that "force" physician documentation of the clinical elements provides an equally accurate capture and representation of ED clinical encounter data as a paper-based, template-driven documentation system both in terms of the presence or absence of both the medically necessary, discrete data elements and the textual documentation-dependent, medical decision-making elements.

Chi-Square Distribution↗
PubMed2001

Nursing process documentation systems in clinical routine--prerequisites and experiences.

Documentation of the nursing process is an important, but often neglected part of clinical documentation. Paper-based systems have been introduced to support nursing process documentation. Frequently, however, problems, such as low quality and high writing efforts, are reported. However, it is still unclear if computer-based documentation systems can reduce these problems. At the Heidelberg University Medical Center, computer-based nursing process documentation projects began in 1998. A computer-based nursing documentation system has now been successfully introduced on four wards of three different departments, supporting all six phases of the nursing process. The introduction of the new documentation system was accompanied by systematic evaluations of prerequisites and consequences. In this paper, we present preliminary results of this evaluation, focusing on prerequisites of computer-based nursing process documentation. We will discuss in detail the creation and use of predefined nursing care plans as one important prerequisite for computer-based nursing documentation. We will also focus on acceptance issues and on organizational and technical issues.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Optimized documentation entry in emergency care using pen computers--initial results].

PURPOSE: Recently, documentation systems based on portable personal computers have become available for application in prehospital emergency medicine. The aim of the present study was to compare a handwritten record system with a pen-computing assisted documentation system. METHODS: 52 consecutive jobs of the local mobile intensive care unit (MICU) were recorded both by means of a handwritten record and by use of a pen-computer-assisted documentation system (NAPROT, based on DIVI-documentation system version 2.5). The paramedic performing pen-computing was obliged to restrict data inputs to those moments during which emergency physician was able to fill in his record. NAPROT routinely checked the records derived from the pen-computer for completeness of data before print-out. RESULTS: Neither hardware nor software problems occurred. Compared to the handwritten records the electronic documentation system resulted in a significant increase in recorded data. The following parameters were recorded more frequently by means of the new method of documentation: Glasgow Coma Score (47 vs 36 patients), positioning manoeuvres (36 vs 19 patients), blood glucose level (25 vs 17 patients), and complications (13 vs. 4 events). CONCLUSION: Pen-computing assisted documentation resulted in superior quality of data recorded in emergency medical files. This increase in information may be ascribed to the integrated check for completeness of data. The described new documentation system, therefore, enhances the processing quality in prehospital emergency medicine. Further developments of the documentation system should concentrate on tools while reducing the workload of the emergency physician.

Ambulances↗
PubMed2005

Sideline documentation and its role in return to sport.

OBJECTIVE: To determine common sideline practices for the management of clinical information in the collegiate setting and review available literature on sideline documentation. DATA SOURCES: A survey was distributed to member schools of the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) to elicit the individual school practices with regard to injury evaluation, medication dispensation, extent of medical record availability, and means and timing of documentation. Articles were retrieved from Pubmed and SportDiscus searches for combinations of terms sports injuries, athletic injuries, return to play, documentation, medical record, injury report, injury card, and injury tracking for items relevant to sideline documentation methods for return to play decision making. RESULTS: We obtained responses from 100% of member schools. One hundred percent of ACC member schools dispense prescription medication following injury evaluation on the sideline. Four of 11 schools do not perform some elemental documentation at that time. Four of 11 ACC schools use some form of electronic medical record for injury documentation. Most schools have access to elemental medical information (such as allergy and medical conditions) on the sideline. A literature search yielded several references to concussion and injury tracking; however, no systematic reports examining sideline documentation systems were obtained. Two articles utilizing card-based systems for injury tracking in the collegiate setting were retrieved. CONCLUSIONS: On-field documentation of return to play decision making has not been widely discussed or systematically studied. In the ACC, most institutions record clinically relevant athletic injury data on-site at the time of evaluation and later prepare a full note describing the evaluation and return to play decisions. We discuss a laminated card-based and a handheld computer-based system as 2 methods for efficient documentation of sideline treatment and return to play decisions. Commercial products and sideline information management and data collection are also discussed.

Athletic Injuries↗