SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Delphi Technique”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Toward the development of advocacy training curricula for pediatric residents: a national delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Training in child advocacy is now required in pediatric residency program curricula. No national consensus exists regarding the content of such advocacy training. OBJECTIVE: To identify an operational definition of advocacy, as well as knowledge, skills, and attitude objectives for advocacy training in pediatric residency programs. METHODS: Professionals experienced in pediatric advocacy and training (n = 53) were invited to participate in a sequence of surveys to define the content of a pediatric residency advocacy curriculum that would result in acquisition of appropriate knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to advocacy for children. Three rounds of surveys were distributed, collected, and analyzed using a modified Delphi technique, in which the results from an antecedent survey were used to refine responses in a subsequent survey. RESULTS: Participants (n = 36), comprising a group of experienced leaders with diverse training and experience in child advocacy and resident education, created a consensus definition for advocacy. They initially identified 179 possible objectives for advocacy curricula. Through the iterative process of the Delphi technique, 32 of those objectives were identified as necessary for inclusion in a child advocacy curriculum for pediatric residents. CONCLUSIONS: Using a modified Delphi technique, a group of experienced leaders in pediatric advocacy were able to reach consensus on an operational definition of child advocacy and a set of objectives for a resident advocacy curriculum. Programs may use these findings to assist in developing an advocacy curriculum based on their own faculty assets and community resources.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Developing a competence framework and evaluation tool for primary care nursing in South Africa.

CONTEXT: Nurses provide the bulk of primary care services in South Africa. Post-apartheid health legislation envisions the provision of comprehensive primary services at all public clinics, which implies the need for a cadre of primary care nurses able to render such services. OBJECTIVES: To identify core competencies of clinic nurses and develop an evaluation tool for primary care nursing in South Africa. METHODS: The descriptive and exploratory techniques used included two meetings of a reference group of South African primary care professionals, followed by a consensus-building exercise. Using the Delphi technique expert opinion was solicited from South Africa, Canada and the USA. FINDINGS: The reference group meetings yielded a list of nine core competencies. Infrastructure issues, such as the supermarket (one-stop shopping) approach to service delivery, communication and transport systems, and the quality of supervision still cause concern. These issues underscore that competence cannot be measured in a vacuum. Input from Delphi participants affirmed the nine core competencies and the need to assess the impact of core competency training. One possible way to measure the nine core competencies would be to use proxy indicators. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Identifying core competencies is a complex process. There is a need to process a wide range of views and ideas. Also, balancing academic concerns with service delivery needs and constraints is an ongoing challenge. A potential limitation of the Delphi technique is participant selection bias and fatigue. Accessing a diverse international panel and making numerous follow up attempts via phone, mail and email were used to attempt to ameliorate these inherent limitations. Although the process is cumbersome, providing "experts" with a venue to wrestle with these ideas can be fruitful. Future studies would help to assess the reliability of the findings.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2001

Environmental initiative prioritization with a Delphi approach: a case study.

India is fast finding its place in the industrialized world and that is beginning to raise its environmental consciousness. The Delphi technique was used to prioritize specific needs and articulate a sustainable urban improvement strategy for the city of Mumbai (formerly Bombay). The Delphi technique is a means of achieving consensual validity among raters by providing them feedback regarding other raters' responses. Mumbai has several indigenous environmental groups that were tapped for activists and leaders; the study was conducted using ten environmentalists. In the initial phases the responses resulted in a range of possible program alternatives. The last two stages helped to seek out information that generated a consensus on the part of the respondent group. Statistical analysis methods included a hierarchical cluster analysis, mean, median, mode, and percent of agreement calculations using SPSS software. The face-to-face discussion in phase 4 clarified some issues and helped the group as a whole to outline the strategy for putting in place the essential elements of a framework to improve the quality of life in an urban environment.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Assessing the institutional effectiveness of state environmental agencies in Turkey.

Improving the performance of the state environmental agencies (SEAs) necessitates an effective institutionalization of governmental environmental management functions. There are examples of successful and unsuccessful SEAs in several parts of the world. Analysis and assessment of these cases can deliver useful insights for institution builders. The objective of this article is the assessment of the institutional effectiveness of the SEAs in Turkey through the perceptions of the experts using the Delphi Technique. In this regard, a checklist is developed including 16 criteria and 123 subcriteria to measure the institutional effectiveness of the SEAs. Twenty-eight national and international experts have formed a Delphi panel and evaluated the national and local conditions. Results, based on the perceptions of the experts, indicate that the overall effectiveness of the SEAs is far less than satisfactory. Negative consensus has been reached over the effectiveness of 13 of the 16 criteria and 95 of the 123 subcriteria; however, no consensus has been achieved over the remainder of the parameters. The survey has also proven that the Delphi Technique can be effectively used for that purpose. Utilization of the checklist method is also useful in diagnosing the problematic components of the SEAs. It is recommended that this approach be used in similar cases elsewhere.

Delphi Technique↗

PubMed2005

Development of a clinical guideline for palliative sedation therapy using the Delphi method.

BACKGROUND: Although palliative sedation therapy is often used in palliative care settings, no clinical guideline is available. OBJECTIVE: To construct a clinical guideline for palliative sedation therapy. DESIGN: The consensus methods using the Delphi technique on the basis of a systematic literature review was used. SETTING/SUBJECTS: A national multidisciplinary committee (five palliative care physicians, four nurses, two oncologists, two psychiatrists, two anesthesiologists, two bioethicists, a medical social worker, and a lawyer). MEASUREMENTS: Validity scoring based on the Delphi method and feasibility. RESULTS: After three sequential sessions of discussion by the Delphi method, an external review by specialists, end-users, and bereaved family members, and a field test, a clinical guideline for palliative sedation therapy was constructed. This guideline includes definitions of palliative sedation therapy, description of the ethical basis of palliative sedation therapy, recommendations about clinical practices in continuous-deep sedation, and diagrams illustrating the clinical application of continuous-deep sedation. CONCLUSION: We constructed a clinical guideline for palliative sedation therapy using the Delphi technique. The clinical efficacy of this guideline should be tested in the future.

Delphi Technique↗

PubMed2006

Defining the dermatological content of the undergraduate medical curriculum: a modified Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Dermatological problems are common, but in undergraduate medical courses time for learning dermatology and teaching dermatology is limited. The Delphi technique has been used in other specialties to define undergraduate and postgraduate curricula and to reach consensus on what is important. OBJECTIVES: To identify the core dermatological content of the undergraduate medical curriculum. METHODS: Modified Delphi technique. A questionnaire was designed after review of previous recommendations made by dermatologists. Items were written as explicit learning outcomes. A multidisciplinary panel of 66 individuals responded. Outcomes were rated using a Likert scale (1-5). RESULTS: Fifty-three learning outcomes were rated 'very important'. We recommend that these are included in the content of U.K. undergraduate medical core curricula. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary panel identified dermatological learning outcomes that should be achieved by all medical graduates. Undergraduate medical curricula must provide sufficient resources for learning, teaching and assessment of dermatology so that graduates achieve these outcomes.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed1999

Can the needs of the critically ill child be identified using scenarios? Experiences of a modified Delphi study.

The Delphi technique enables the structuring of group opinion and discussion using a survey approach, maintaining the anonymity of panel members and preventing contamination of individual responses through peer pressure. The Delphi technique was used by the authors to form an expert opinion regarding the needs of a critically ill child. The abstract and evaluative nature of need was a key issue to arise during early pilot work and stimulated the first author to undertake a concept analysis of the term 'need'. The defining attributes arising from the concept analysis were used to construct two hypothetical case studies for the modified Delphi; these were used as part of the questionnaire for all three rounds. In the first round, the panel was asked to identify the needs of the child in the two case studies; in subsequent rounds the panel activity involved modifying these need statements and indicating the importance, frequency and maximum acceptable delay in meeting each need. Extensive pilot work was required for each round of the modified Delphi. This article evaluates the use of this technique to identify needs, discusses key features arising from the results and examines the difficulties experienced by the respondents in completing the time scales.

Child↗

PubMed2006

Developing a competence-based core curriculum in biomedical laboratory science: a Delphi study.

In this study the Delphi technique has been used to develop a core curriculum for education of the biomedical scientist. The rapid development in biomedicine and the corresponding changes in methodology in biomedical laboratories demand careful planning of the education of biomedical scientists. The Delphi technique uses an anonymous panel of experts for suggestions and assessments aiming at consensus. Twenty-six experts from different kinds of hospital and university laboratories took part in the investigation. They suggested and assessed necessary competences for a recently graduated biomedical scientist, and if 75% or more of the participants agreed on a competence, it was included in the core curriculum. The final list consisted of 66 competences of varying depth, in three categories. This list contained several generic competences, concerning for example basic laboratory methods, handling of samples, dealing with apparatus and applying relevant rules and laws; basic knowledge in chemistry, preclinical medicine and laboratory methods; and finally attitudes that the panel expected in the recently graduated person. The core was sufficiently restricted to be used in a three-year programme and still leave space for about one year of electives/special study modules. It became rather traditional, e.g. it did not include competences that many recent reports consider important for the future professional.

Biomedical Research↗

PubMed2003

Initiation of biological agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a Delphi study by the ASAS Group.

BACKGROUND: There is ample evidence of important symptomatic efficacy of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibition in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Moreover, studies suggest that anti-TNF could be considered as the first disease controlling antirheumatic treatment (DC-ART) for AS. OBJECTIVE: To determine precisely which patients with AS are most likely to benefit from anti-TNFalpha treatment because of the cost and possible long term side effects of such treatment. METHODS: Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) members were asked to use a Delphi technique to name the characteristics of patients with AS for whom they would start DC-ART, in three different clinical presentations (isolated axial involvement, peripheral arthritis, enthesitis). RESULTS: Among the 62 invited ASAS members, more than 50% actively participated in the four phases of definition according to the Delphi technique. For each of the three clinical presentations, a combination of five to six domains was proposed, with an evaluation instrument and a cut off point defining a minimum level of activity for each domain. CONCLUSION: This study provides a profile for a patient with AS for considering initiation of biological agents that reflects the opinion of the ASAS members, using a Delphi exercise. Further studies are required to assess their relevance and their consistency with clinical practice.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Emergency calls not requiring an urgent ambulance response: expert consensus.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought expert consensus about which categories of patients from 248 Medical Priority (MPDS) ambulance dispatch codes might be appropriate for a nonemergency response or for whom dispatch of an ambulance might be appropriately denied if the patient were referred to a more suitable health care provider. METHODS: A Delphi technique was used. Ten physicians, from the specialities of emergency medicine, general practice, and pre-hospital care formed the expert panel but were blinded to each other's identity. Participants received a written description of the operation of the MPDS and the Delphi technique and voted independently by mail. RESULTS: Using majority voting, 54 dispatch codes (22%) were recommended for a nonemergency response/referral. This equates to 12.44% of annual emergency calls in a typical UK ambulance service (n = 9,021; 95% confidence interval, 12.21 to 12.69%). The kappa statistic (chance-corrected proportional agreement) between members of the expert panel was 0.62 (substantial). CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dispatch codes for non-emergency response or referral represent a significant proportion of emergency ambulance calls. Theoretically, the implementation of nonemergency responses could have the benefit of reducing accidents involving emergency ambulances and could lead to improved response times for critically ill patients by freeing up resources. It could also support the targeting of patients to appropriate health care providers on first contact with the health service. However, given the poor reliability of expert opinion, further research using clinical outcome data is required to validate the recommendations made in this article before changing existing ambulance response systems.

Ambulances↗

PubMed2003

A Delphi study to determine nursing research priorities in the North Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust and the corresponding evidence base.

The aims of the study are to identify and prioritize research questions of importance to nurses in North Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust and to investigate and describe the existing evidence base for the highest priority questions identified. The consensus method known as the Delphi technique was used. Systematic searching of the literature for each question identified from the research priorities enabled the existing evidence base to be characterized. The following priorities were identified as the most important (in descending order of importance): Recruitment and Retention of Nursing Staff; Staff Stress & Morale; Training & Education of Nursing Staff; Infection Control; and Pain Management. The Delphi technique proved a useful method to determine and prioritize research areas in nursing.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1995

Initial stages in the development of valid criteria for the replacement of amalgam restorations.

OBJECTIVES: Replacement amalgam restorations account for the largest single cost in the General Dental Services in Scotland. There is little practical advice available to practitioners on the maintenance and replacement of amalgam restorations. A distance learning package is being prepared for distribution to general dental practitioners in Scotland and this paper describes the initial stages in the development of the policy statements for the proposed package. METHODS: In the first stage proposals are being developed by a panel of dental academics using a modified Delphi technique. This technique is designed to produce a consensus view. Seventeen statements have been set out by the expert group. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: While agreement was rapidly reached that 'ditching' of amalgam restoration margins did not justify their replacement and that repair was preferable to total replacement, some difficulty was experienced in arriving at a consensus view on the correct management of 'white spot' lesions at restoration margins and dentinal staining adjacent to amalgam restorations. The next stage in the development will be to present these statements to a selected panel of general dental practitioners and to develop their consensus view of the proposals, again using the Delphi technique.

Delphi Technique↗

PubMed2004

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention injury research agenda: identification of acute care research topics of interest to the Centers for disease Control and Prevention--National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to identify the most important research questions pertaining to the acute care of the injured patient using a Web-based Delphi technique to achieve expert opinion consensus. METHODS: Experts in trauma care from the United States and Canada (n =39) generated structured research questions and then ranked these questions in order of importance, using a Web-based survey for question generation, question ranking, and a Delphi technique of consensus. Guidelines for question construction and ranking specified that participants considered questions that fall within the interest and domain of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC)-National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (NCIPC). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven questions in 18 distinct categories of interest were initially generated. After two rounds of merging, collating, reassessing, and ranking by significance and importance, 25 research questions were deemed most important and significant in the care of the injured patient. Ten of these (40%) were considered to be appropriate issues for the CDC-NCIPC to address and fund, dealing with injury prevention strategies, trauma systems design and funding, the epidemiology of injury, and global outcome determinants. These 25 questions were also reviewed with consideration given to the most likely source of federal funding of investigations. CONCLUSION: This report identifies the areas of trauma care in which research efforts might best be directed. Fully 40% of the key research questions could be considered to fall under the interest and auspices of the CDC-NCIPC. The remaining questions cover a broad range of topics and likely funding sources, emphasizing the need for a coordinated oversight of research funding in trauma care.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1996

The identification of ethical issues in physical therapy practice.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the current ethical issues facing physical therapists and (2) ethical issues that may be faced in the future by physical therapists. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Delphi technique was used as the research design for this study. The panel of experts for the study were selected from Papers submitted by past and present members of the Judicial Committee of the American Physical Therapy Association. A series of three questionnaires were sent to the members of the panel. Following the Delphi technique, the first questionnaire contained broad questions designed to elicit a wide range of responses. The second and third questionnaires were then developed from the information received in the preceding questionnaire. RESULTS: The results of the first question of the study identified 10 current ethical issues as consensus choices by the panel and 3 issues as near-consensus. The panel responses to the second question identified 4 future ethical issues. A combined list of current and future contained 16 issues in physical therapy. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The 16 issues addressed ethical considerations in different areas of physical therapy practice: 6 issues involving patient rights and welfare, 5 professional issues, and 5 issues relating to business and economic factors. Thirteen of these issues have not been discussed in previous physical therapy literature and would be suggested topics for future study.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2002

Development of a list of consensus-approved clinical indicators of preventable drug-related morbidity in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Older patients (aged >65 years) may experience drug-related problems that, if unrecognized, can result in drug-related morbidities (DRMs). According to the literature, 49% to 76% of all DRMs may be preventable; however, there is little consensus as to which are preventable and which are not. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop consensus-approved clinical indicators of preventable DRM (PDRM) in older adults. Geriatricians, clinical pharmacologists, general practitioners, and clinical pharmacists were included in the consensus-building process. METHODS: In 2001, a survey containing potential indicators of PDRM was prepared based on previous research and the input of 2 clinical pharmacists. The survey was administered concurrently via the Delphi technique to 2 separate specialist panels (6 geriatricians and 6 clinical pharmacologists) to generate clinical indicators of PDRMs in older adults. Subsequently, a focus group of 12 general practitioners (GPs) assessed these PDRM indicators in Nova Scotia, Canada. RESULTS: The specialist panels generated 58 consensus-approved clinical indicators of PDRMs in older adults after 2 rounds of the Delphi technique. The GPs agreed with 52 (90%) of these PDRM indicators. CONCLUSIONS: This study generated consensus-approved indicators of PDRMs in older adults, which could be used by health professionals to identify patients at risk for PDRMs. The indicators could also have a role in quality measurement systems and in epidemiologic research. Furthermore, the indicators could complement existing clinical indicators and establish an important link between patterns of care and clinical outcomes.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Nursing education planning: a Delphi study.

The purpose of this study was to assess the Delphi technique as a viable method for forecasting future events in nursing education by determining the degree of accuracy of previously predicted events and identifying the circumstances that delayed or accelerated occurrence of the predicted events. Data were collected by three rounds of questionnaires distributed to 33 administrative heads of all nursing education programs in a southeastern state. The use of simple statistics concluded the Delphi technique was a valid instrument in nursing education planning: 22 of 26 events occurred as predicted, resulting in an 84.6% accuracy rate; 24 of 25 events which had not occurred remained viable, resulting in a 96% accuracy rate; 98.1% of the original events had either occurred or were still viable to occur.

Curriculum↗

PubMed1999

Research priorities for nephrology nursing: American Nephrology Nurses' Association's Delphi Study.

The purpose of this study was to identify and prioritize research topics of importance for nephrology nursing and the American Nephrology Nurses' Association (ANNA). This was an explorative survey design using the Delphi technique. Nephrology nurses who are members of ANNA participated in the study. In Round 1 participants included 90 members of the Advanced Practice Special Interest Group. Round 2 participants were 537 nephrology nurses who attended the 28th ANNA National Symposium. Participants in Round 3 were 491 ANNA members who had at least a master's degree in nursing or another field. A three-round Delphi technique was used to solicit, identify, and prioritize problems for nephrology nursing research. In Round 1, 90 nurses identified problems in response to an open-ended question. These responses were analyzed and categorized into a 21-item research survey that was used for subsequent rounds. Round 2 participants rated each research question/topic on the survey on a 1 to 5 scale for level of importance. In addition, they were asked to identify the top-ranked research priorities from the 21 questions. In Round 3, the participants were asked to do the same as in Round 2. In addition, they indicated whether the research priority was primarily a nursing responsibility or a collaborative effort with other health care personnel. Based on 3 rounds of the Delphi study and analysis of both level of importance and rated-research priority, the five areas that were identified as research priorities are (a) nursing interventions to prevent vascular access infections, (b) nursing interventions to maintain vascular access patency, (c) educational needs of patients and families, (d) levels of nursing competence and the effect on patient outcomes, and (e) validation of nursing interventions to achieve patient outcomes. These research priorities provide direction for nephrology nursing research and the ANNA. This Delphi study represents a significant step for ANNA in its commitment to research.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

[Prevention priorities in mental health in Geneva: a study using the Delphi technic].

A Delphi technique was used to determine priorities for mental health prevention in Geneva. The study comprised two rounds of postal questionnaires targeted at 58 participants concerned and/or interested by mental health through their association or their work. From the responses given in the first round mental health problems were listed, essentially health problems (65%) and service problems (11%) and less frequently resources problems (< 1%). Consensus produced in the second round indicated that 3 problems were priorities for the development of preventive measures: depression, alcohol abuse, maltraitance and sexual abuse. Using the Delphi technique, a qualitative method corresponding to a subjective consensus issued from a group of experts, priorities for mental health prevention were identified in Geneva, in 1995.

Adolescent↗