Properties of LTV vinyl silicone rubber-based resilient denture base liner and directions for use.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
When soft lining materials are used in complete dentures it is important to control their thickness and increase the probability of their staying in the denture base. A spacer made of light-curing denture base material makes it possible to do both of these things. The denture base resin is packed against the hard light-cured spacer and can be partially cured. The cured spacer will not flow or be displaced and can be easily removed to allow an even space for packing the soft lining material.
Soft denture liners are used for edentulous patients to cushion functional forces. We hypothesized that the application of soft liners having viscoelastic properties would lead to the most marked improvement in masticatory function. The shear storage modulus (G'), shear loss modulus (G''), and loss tangent (tan delta) were determined for 6 materials by means of a dynamic viscoelastometer. Masticatory function of ten subjects was evaluated by measurements of maximum bite forces and chewing times and frequencies for 2 food samples, and by the use of visual analogue scales. The acrylic materials exhibited viscoelastic behavior, while the silicones exhibited elastic behavior. The improvement in masticatory function compared with hard resin was found to be in the order: acrylic permanent materials > silicone > acrylic temporary materials. The results suggest that the use of materials with higher tan delta and G' provides the most optimum masticatory function for patients requiring the provision of soft liners on their dentures.
PURPOSE: This in-vivo investigation evaluated the effect of 2 denture sealer agents on the microbial colonization of a newly placed soft interim denture liner during a period of 14 days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An interim soft denture liner (Coe-Soft; GC America, Alsip, IL) was coated with 2 different denture surface sealants (Palaseal [Heraeus Kulzer, Irvine, CA] and Mono-Poly [Plastodent, New York, NY]). Three rectangular wells of 1 cm wide x 2 cm long x 2 mm deep were placed in the intaglio of 10 maxillary complete dentures and filled with the soft liner material. The soft liner surface was treated with Palaseal (first well) and Mono-Poly (second well), and the unsealed (third well) was used as a control. These were exposed to the oral cavity for 14 days. The effect the sealant had in the prevention of Candidal colonization in vivo of the soft liner material was evaluated. Microbiological specimens were recovered from all samples and cultivated. Microbiological data from the control and 2-test samples in each denture were tabulated, and statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: This investigation showed clear differences (p <.001) between the sealed and unsealed soft liners. The sealed material showed significantly less colonization by yeast and bacteria. Intercomparison of the surface denture sealers, Palaseal versus Mono-Poly, showed no statistically significant differences (p < .005) in total yeast or bacterial colonization. CONCLUSION: Coating of Coe-Soft denture liner with either Palaseal or Mono-Poly significantly decreased yeast and bacterial colonization. .
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The clinical use of resilient denture liners is based on their flexibility and elasticity. The nine commercial resilient denture liners measured were less flexible during and after simulated chewing and clenching test sequences. The elasticity of the intraoral-cure liners reached maximal values at 24 hours. Although interpretations require caution, the results imply that the dentist should (1) use maximum liner thickness in the denture base when conditioning abused supporting tissues because of the material's tendency to stiffen under function, and (2) leave a functional impression in the mouth for at least 24 hours before pouring the cast.
Denture soft lining materials are compliant cushions used at the oral tissue-denture interface. They are generally required to have sufficient compliance to redistribute mastication load, as well as an adequate modulus for long-term dimensional stability and control over the water uptake. This study investigated the effect of using silane treated fumed silica as a filler on the properties of experimental soft lining materials based on blends of isoprene-styrene (SIS) block co-polymer and mixtures of methyl methacrylate (MMA) and 1,6-hexandiol dimethacrylate (HDMA). The overall elastomer/monomer ratios were maintained, whereas the monomers ranged from 10 to 60% HDMA. The silica filler level was maintained at 10 wt% with respect to SIS. The properties investigated were the dynamic mechanical parameters of storage modulus (E') and tan delta as a function of temperature and the quasi-static mechanical parameters of ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and elongation to break (Eb) as well as absorption properties that were carried out in water and saline. In both unfilled and filled systems there was an increase in E' and a decrease in tan delta with an increase in HDMA. Silica addition tended to increase E' and substantially reduce tan delta in materials with less than 20% HDMA. UTS decreased with filler and HDMA content, however, Eb was greater for filled systems. Generally, in the long term, the water uptake decreased with increasing HDMA content and E'. The silanated silica further reduced the water uptake, indicating a cross-linking effect, thus increasing the restraining force on droplet growth. The uptake in saline was significantly reduced indicating an osmotically controlled uptake process.
A step-by-step technique has been described to construct stabilized record bases which allows the dentist to take advantage of undercuts through the use of a resilient denture liner material in the undercut regions. The resilient denture liner material protects the rugae and prevents damage to the casts in the undercut regions during repeated placing and removal from the cast. Shellac denture base material at the posterior limit of the record base permits an easy method of checking the posterior palatal seal. The incorporation of the posterior palatal seal in the record base allows for adequate retention during the recording of the maxillomandibular jaw relation records and try-in procedures. The record bases made by the sprinkle-on technique are preferred to those made using the dough method. The bases are rigid, stable, not easily broken or warped, and fit accurately.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Infection of denture materials with Candida albicans is common and contributes to denture stomatitis. PURPOSE: This 3-phase investigation examined: (1) the efficacy of microwave irradiation against C albicans colonized on 3 soft denture liners and 1 heat-polymerized denture base resin, and (2) the effect of this irradiation on the hardness of the materials tested. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In phase 1, an experimental protocol was developed. Sterilized specimens from 2 denture base soft liners and 1 heat-polymerized acrylic resin denture base material (n = 45 each) were inoculated with C albicans. Two thirds of the specimens were irradiated in a 60 Hz microwave oven for 5 minutes (dry). C albicans growth was then assessed with streaked blood agar plates and thioglycollate broth. One third of the specimens were not irradiated and served as controls. Pretest and posttest Shore A hardness values were obtained and compared. For phase 2, 15 specimens from each material group were subjected to irradiation (while immersed in water) for 5 minutes; and, 15 from each material were subjected to 10- and 15-minute irradiation (dry), with subsequent sterility and change in hardness assessments completed as described in phase 1. In phase 3, 15 specimens from each material group were subjected to repeated 5-minute irradiation cycles (while immersed in water), and changes in hardness were examined. RESULTS: Only the 5-minute irradiated specimens immersed in water were effectively sterilized, as verified by the thioglycollate assay. The effect of repeated 5-minute irradiation cycles resulted in a significant change in hardness of the PermaSoft specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Five-minute irradiation, while immersed in water, killed all C albicans present on the materials tested; and, repeated 5-minute irradiation significantly affected the hardness of only the PermaSoft material.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Autopolymerizing hard-setting direct relining resin is currently being used in dentistry to attain denture bases that conform to the supporting tissues with a high degree of accuracy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the flow of six commercial hard-setting direct relining resins (Denture Liner, Kooliner, New Truliner, Rebaron, Swift, Tokuso Rebase) and several types of impression materials (zinc oxide-eugenol, polysulfide rubber, silicone rubber) using the parallel plate viscometer. The viscometer is used to measure the spread radius of samples (a volume of 0.5 cm3) between two parallel flat plates when a load of 750-gram weight is applied at 1, 10, 60, 100 seconds after loading has begun. In this experiment, the load was applied at 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 300 seconds after mixing had begun. All the samples were mixed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The findings were as follows; 1. The flow of the six commercial hard-setting direct relining resins could be compared with one another by the spread radius at 1 second after loading (r1) with no relation to time lapse after initiation of the mix. 2. Denture Liner, Kooliner, Rebaron and Swift had the same flow characteristic when r1 was the same. 3. Polysulfide rubber impression materials had similar flow characteristic to hard-setting direct relining resins.
A technique is described for designing and making a mandibular denture, for patients with severely resorbed and compromised residual alveolar ridges. The denture base is stabilized by a mucostatic impression technique, myostatic denture base design, weight of a cast metal denture base, and noninterceptive occlusion with monoplane or Centrimatic posterior teeth. The hard metal denture base is made tissue-compatible by means of a soft denture liner attached to a specially relieved cast metal denture base. Over a 2-year period, this technique has successfully provided, in my practice, an alternative to residual alveolar ridge implants and other surgical interventions for 22 edentulous patients with severely resorbed and compromised mandibular residual alveolar ridges.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Resilient denture liners offer an alternative method of designing implant-retained overdentures. Space is provided in the overdenture to envelop the implant bar with a resilient liner to be applied chairside or processed in the laboratory. The degree of retention may vary and these materials change over time. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the retention on an implant/bar prosthesis with overdentures lined with 4 resilient denture lining materials, after cyclic insertion and removal over a simulated 1.5-year period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four implants were placed in a mandibular edentulous cast and a gold bar superstructure was made. Overdentures were processed in Lucitone-199 and Tokuyama, Luci-Sof, Molloplast-B, and PermaSoft (with and without sealer) lining materials, cured according to manufacturers' instructions. Each of 5 overdentures contained each liner and were cycled 2740 times (simulating 1.5 years of service at 5 insertions daily) in 37 degrees C water in an Instron at 20 cm/min. Insertion and retention force were measured. RESULTS: The 3 silicone rubber liners were 3 to 5 times more retentive than the plasticized acrylic liner initially. After cycling, Tokuyama soft liner (autopolymerized silicone) gained 14% retention, Luci-Sof (heat-cured silicone) gained 8%, Molloplast-B (heat-cured silicone) lost 12%, whereas PermaSoft (autopolymerized plasticized acrylic) with sealer lost 43%, and without sealer lost 60%. PermaSoft lining material also chafed and crumbled after cycling and was significantly less retentive in most statistical comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: All the silicone-based resilient liners retained the overdentures well. The plasticized acrylic was less retentive initially, and lost significant retention after 2740 cycles, compared with silicone-based resilient liners.
The use of Molloplast-B within the abutments of mandibular overdentures is an easy and inexpensive method for increasing retention and stability of dentures. The use of a retentive area prepared in natural tooth structure increases retentive capabilities for the overdenture patient. Unlike some silicone denture liners, Molloplast-B has shown an inhibitory effect to the growth of Candida albicans. Molloplast-B can be used in the conventional overdenture method or as described for an immediate overdenture. This type of overdenture can be relined easily to adjust for changes in mouth architecture. How well this material will retain its shape and consistency needs to be observed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.