PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ESOPHAGEAL STENOSIS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Management of congenital esophageal stenosis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The authors report the incidence, diagnosis, and treatment methods of congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) at their institution. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 123 patients with tracheoesophageal anomalies in a pediatric hospital between 1980 and 1999 was performed. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics, presence of true CES, associated congenital anomalies, method of diagnosis, methods of treatment, and histopathology. RESULTS: Six of the 123 patients (4.9%) had true CES (one patient had 2 separate stenoses). Two patients had isolated CES, one patient had CES with isolated tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), one patient had CES with isolated esophageal atresia (EA), and 2 patients had CES with EA/TEF. Diagnoses were made with an upper gastrointestinal (GI) contrast study in 5 patients, and one patient had one of 2 stenoses diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound and the other diagnosed intraoperatively. Four of the 7 stenoses were treated with surgical resection, and the remainder was treated with esophageal dilatation. Histopathology from the 4 resected stenoses showed tracheobronchial remnants in 3 specimens and submucosal thickening in 1 specimen. CONCLUSIONS: Although isolated CES is rare (2 of 123 = 1.6%), CES associated with other tracheoesophageal anomalies has a higher incidence (4 of 123 = 3.25%). Patients with this lesion should be treated first with dilatation. If ineffective, resection is required.

Dilatation↗
PubMed2004

Congenital esophageal stenosis: a case report and review of the literature.

A child with congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) demonstrates the need for accuracy in the diagnosis and management of this rare problem. Other etiologies of dysphagia must be looked into, but when the expected results are not realized CES should be considered. A range of diagnoses and diagnostic studies may help to get children with dysphagia the treatment that they need to resolve their symptoms.

Child, Preschool↗
PubMed1985

[Esophageal stenosis with tracheo-bronchial heterotopy. Apropos of 3 cases].

Three cases of esophageal stenosis with tracheo-bronchial remnants within the wall of the esophagus, near the cardia, are reported: two girls and one boy; in three, this anomaly contains cartilage remnants. After various procedures, esophagoplasty was necessary when the boy of the first case was fourteen. Two girls was cured by a Thal procedure with follow-up of five and four years respectively. A survey of the references found 43 other cases. This anomaly is more frequent in girls. Tracheo-bronchial remnants are located usually in the esophagus near the cardia and contains cartilage. Rarely the respiratory inclusion is seen in the middle part of the esophagus and no cartilage is then identified. The stenotic segment is lined by squamous cell epithelium and the heterotopic tracheo-bronchial structures are intramural implants. The diagnosis should be suspected in cases of esophageal obstruction presenting in childhood or adult life with a history dating back to infancy or childhood. Radiologically a short stenotic non relaxing segment is the hallmark in the distal esophageal localisation. Resection of the stenotic segment with primary anastomosis is the method of choice in the middle part of the esophagus. That procedure is a good alternative in the distal esophagus.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Congenital esophageal stenosis: Therapeutic strategy based on etiology.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The diagnosis and treatment of congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) can be a vexing clinical problem. This study aims at determining the ideal therapeutic strategy for the management of CES. METHODS: Medical records of patients with CES were reviewed retrospectively with regard to diagnostic method, therapy, and outcome. RESULTS: During the last 29 years, 36 patients, aged 1 month to 9 years, were found to have CES. Diagnosis was made by fluoroscopy, esophagoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and pathologic examination. Of the 36 patients, 15 had tracheobronchial remnants (TBR), 13 had fibromuscular stenosis (FMS), 5 had membranous stenosis (MS), and 3 had multiple stenoses (MPS). EUS was diagnostic in distinguishing TBR from FMS. All patients with TBR underwent operative repair in which 13 patients had resection and anastomosis with or without preoperative dilation. The 14th patient had enucleation and the 15th underwent myotomy. Postoperative dilation was needed 2.2 times for 2.1 months on average in this group of patients. Ten patients with FMS were treated by dilation only (a mean of 4.7 dilations was required for a duration of 2.6 years), whereas 3 patients underwent open surgical intervention. Most patients with MS or MPS were treated by dilation (with or without endoscopic resection of the membranes), whereas 2 patients had surgical intervention. All patients in this study are doing well after a mean follow-up period of 5.3 years (range, 0.5 to 25 years) without any further operative interventions. CONCLUSIONS: If the etiologic diagnosis of CES is unclear, EUS is useful in distinguishing TBR from FMS. This distinction is critical, because patients with TBR should undergo surgical resection, whereas most cases of FMS, MS, and MPS can be treated with esophageal dilation alone.

Child↗
PubMed1990

[Treatment of benign esophageal stenosis: re-evaluation after 20 years].

In 1972 we described a method for dilatation of esophageal stenosis. The purpose of this paper is to report the results obtained between 1970 and 1989, the patients were studied by X-Rays, "calibration" of the stenosis, endoscopy, biopsy, cytology, gastric analysis and esophageal motility. One hundred and seven patients were treated (mean 60.5 years, M/F 3.9/1). The most frequent etiology was reflux esophagitis (80.3%). Hiatus hernia was present in 84.9%. The stenosis was in the lower third of the esophagus in 92.5%. The BAO was mean: 3.6 mEq/h, and the MAO mean 16.4 mEq/h with a hypersecretion pattern in 33.1% of the cases. Cytology was negative for malignancy in 100%. Biopsy showed esophagitis in 86.9%, Barrett's epithelium in 12.1%, normal tissue in 6.5% and insufficient material in 1.8%. Endoscopy showed 98.1% of grade IV esophagitis. Esophageal motility showed a HPZ of mean 6.5 mmHg. and varying degrees of aperistalsis in 24.3% of the patients. The total number of dilatations was 555 (mean 5.1/pt). The "calibration" of the stenosis previous to the dilatation was mean 8.6 mm, and post dilatation mean 15.6 mm. The result of the procedure was good in 92.5%, regular in 2.8% and bad in 4.6%. The morbidity was 0.9% and the mortality 0.1%. There was relapse of the stenosis in 42% of the cases, the follow-up was mean 3.2 years. Twenty nine patients were submitted to surgery due to failure of the procedure with 68.1% of good results, morbidity of 9% and mortality of 9%. We conclude that this dilatation procedure offers excellent results with a very low morbi-mortality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

[Results of endoscopic dilatation treatment of benign esophageal stenosis].

The management of benign esophageal stenoses is based on endoscopic dilatation of the tight segment for the remission of dysphagia. Five hundred and twenty sessions of dilatation with Savary-Guilliard bougies have been performed in one hundred and twenty-nine patients with benign esophageal stenoses. Patients with peptic stenoses (n = 59) needed a lesser number of sessions (mean: 2.47) than patients with postsurgical (n = 44; mean: 4.86) or caustic (n = 18; mean: 7.77) stenoses. The treatment failed in 4 patients (3.2%) and severe complications were observed in 3 patients (2.4%). These results support the efficacy and safety of this technique.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Endoscopic tube implantation for the palliation of malignant esophageal stenosis.

One hundred endoscopic tube implantations were carried out on 95 patients with malignant esophageal stenosis. Palliative treatment was performed in 43% of cases because of the advanced stage of the tumor, and in 57% of cases because of risk factors which made resection inadvisable. Clinical mortality was 16%, with six deaths caused by technical complications (perforation, arrosion bleeding), and ten by cardiopulmonary problems. Dislodgement or obstruction of the prostheses was observed in 20% of cases, but could readily be corrected. The median survival time was two months, with 17% of the patients still alive after six months. Poor general health, advanced age and the presence of distant metastases were established as unfavorable prognostic indications with a significant influence on postoperative mortality. Functional results were good: 87% of patients were able to eat solid or pulpy food post-operatively.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Congenital esophageal stenosis: report of three cases, literature review, and a proposed classification.

The aim of this paper is to report three cases of congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) of different anatomical varieties: (1) stenosis due to tracheobronchial remnants (TBR) involving the lower third of the esophagus; (2) fibromuscular stenosis (FMS) of the middle third; and (3) a membranous diaphragm (MD) involving the lower third. The first two patients were treated by segmental resection of the esophagus and end-to-end anastomosis with dramatic relief of symptoms. The third responded to dilatation. CES is a rare lesion, and about 500 cases are reported in the literature. CES due to TBR and fibromuscular hypertrophy is considered a segmental stenosis, as it involves a length of the esophageal wall, whereas the MD consists of mucosal folds and does not involve its muscular layer. The clinical presentation is varied, and a high index of suspicion is essential to arrive at an early diagnosis. Management depends on the type and severity of the stenosis. Stenosis due to TBR requires segmental resection. FMS may respond to dilatation, but severe degrees of stenosis require segmental excision. MDs usually respond to dilatation or may require endoscopic excision. Segmental stenosis can occur as an isolated lesion or in association with esophageal atresia or stenosis due to a MD. Based on this observation, a classification of CES is proposed.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMed2005

High-grade congenital esophageal stenosis owing to a membranous diaphragm with tracheoesophageal fistula.

Gross E-type congenital esophageal atresia associated with congenital esophageal stenosis is extremely rare. In a male infant born at 36 weeks of gestation, bubbly vomiting was noted after birth. X-ray films of the chest and abdomen showed coil-up sign of the nasogastric tube and gas in the stomach and small intestines were recognized, so gross C-type esophageal atresia was suspected and surgery was performed on the first day of life. Surgery revealed the presence of a tracheoesophageal fistula in the upper esophagus and membranous stenosis on the distal side.

Esophageal Stenosis↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Treatment of esophageal stenosis with Savary-Gilliard balloons in children].

30 patients (less than 15 years old) were admitted for esophageal strictures, 16 of them secondary to corrosive injury. All the patients were treated with endoscopic dilation with Savary Gilliard bougie. The dilatation were done with general anesthesia using an Olympus GIF-XP10 endoscope and with fluoroscopic control. In the esophageal stenosis secondary to caustic ingestion endoscopic injection with Betamethasone was also used. The most frequent site of the stenosis was the upper third of the esophagus, and the main type of stenosis was tubular in the secondary to caustic burns and annular in the other group. In the posteaustic group 385 dilatations were performed in 115 sessions. Two perforations and one sepsis were reported in patients with corrosive stenosis. There was no mortality. 43.7% of the patients with corrosive stenosis and 85.7% with stenosis secondary to other causes obtained complete healing. Oesophageal dilatation with Savary-Gilliary bougies represents a safe and reliable method for the treatment of esophageal strictures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1977

[Our experience in esophago-colonic plastic surgery for esophageal stenosis caused by caustics].

The Authors report their experience (16 cases) in esophago-colon plastic surgery for esophageal stenosis from caustics and emphasize the advantages presented by the colon as a substitute for the esophagus, as compared with the stomach and jejunum. Although the results were equally satisfactory irrespective of the selected segment of colon, the Authors indicate their present preference for the left colon because of some technical aspects making the operation easier and more reliable.

Adolescent↗