SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ESOPHAGECTOMY”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMed2007

Impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection on outcome after esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has reached endemic proportions in the United Kingdom. The aim of the present study was to determine the frequency of MRSA infection in patients undergoing esophagectomy and to report its impact on patient outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population was 98 patients undergoing esophagectomy for carcinoma during the years 1998-2004. Patient information was collected prospectively and entered into a computerized database and analyzed retrospectively by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 20 of the 98 patients (20%) developed infection with MRSA after esophagectomy. Patients who developed MRSA infection had greater levels of postoperative morbidity, longer intensive care unit (ICU) stays (median 2 days versus 1 day, P = 0.005) and hospital stays (21 days versus 16 days, P < 0.001) compared to those who did not develop infection. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative chemotherapy (P = 0.006) and readmission to the ICU (P = 0.007) as significant risk factors with MRSA infection. Overall, 17 of 46 patients (37%) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy developed MRSA infection, compared to 3 of 52 (6%) who did not receive this treatment (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, one in five patients undergoing esophagectomy developed MRSA infection, with those patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy identified as being at greatest risk of this complication. This is an alarming finding, as neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with esophageal carcinoma in the United Kingdom.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Prophylactic esophagectomy in Barrett esophagus with high-grade dysplasia.

OBJECTIVES: We review the significance of Barrett mucosa with high-grade dysplasia, management options, rationale for prophylactic esophagectomy, and results of surgical treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The surgical results of prophylactic esophagectomy are presented from two previous studies, involving 60 patients over 1982-2001 at a single institution. These results are compared with nonsurgical treatment options. RESULTS: The transhiatal esophagectomy technique was the most commonly used surgical approach (81.7% of patients). Operative mortality was 1.7%. The incidence of occult adenocarcinoma for 1982-1994 and 1994-2001 was 43% and 16.7%, respectively. The overall incidence of occult adenocarcinoma for the entire study period was 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic esophagectomy for patients with Barrett esophagus and high-grade dysplasia, performed at a center of high volume and experience, can be accomplished with low mortality and excellent long-term survival. Incidence of occult adenocarcinoma is decreasing, but still 16.7-30%.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2007

Effect of pyloric drainage procedures on gastric passage and bile reflux after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Controversy still exists about the need for pyloric drainage procedures (pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy) after esophagectomy with esophagogastrostomy and vagotomy. Although pyloric drainage may prevent postoperative delayed gastric emptying, it may also promote bile reflux into the oesophagus. We analysed pyloric drainage methods for their potential effect on gastric outlet obstruction and bile reflux in patients undergoing esophagectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety-eight patients with esophageal carcinoma were treated by transthoracal esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction either with pyloromyotomy (group II, n = 118), pyloroplasty (group III, n = 34) or without pyloric drainage (group I, n = 46) between January 2000 and December 2004. The postoperative gastrointestinal passage by radiological investigation, anastomotic leakage rate, mortality and incidence of gastroesophageal reflux by endoscopy within the first postoperative year were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Patient demographics and the types of surgical procedures did not differ between the three groups. There was no difference in hospital mortality, anastomotic leakage rate, gastrointestinal passage and postoperative hospital stay between the three groups. However, more patients with pyloric drainage showed bile reflux (I = 0% vs II+III=14.9%, p = 0.069) and reflux esophagitis (I = 10.3% vs II+III = 34.5%, p < 0.05) compared to patients without pyloric drainage. On the multivariate analysis, pyloric drainage and the anastomotic height were independent and were significant risk factors associated with postoperative reflux esophagitis. CONCLUSION: Pyloric drainage after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction should be omitted because it does not improve gastric emptying and may favour biliary reflux esophagitis.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) is a radical strategy for treatment of esophageal cancer, and the morbidity and mortality are high. Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) is advantageous because it avoids thoracotomy and has a shorter surgical time, but risk of intraoperative morbidity stresses the surgeon and lymph node sampling is not possible. METHODS: Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) was performed in 42 patients with esophageal cancer. Patients with superficial esophageal cancer and medical risk were included. Feasibility and efficacy of this procedure are discussed by examining short- and long-term morbidity, mortality, and survival. RESULTS: With the mediastinoscope, esophagectomy was performed safely under direct vision. There was only a small amount of bleeding, and surgical time was short. Little morbidity and no deaths were recorded. CONCLUSION: MATHE is a safe and minimally invasive technique that allows direct visualization of mediastinal structures Lymph node sampling was feasible because of clear visualization of the mediastinum.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

The safety and usefulness of endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis early after esophagectomy and reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Although rare, graft ischemia and necrosis after esophagectomy is a devastating complication. The aim of this study was to review our experience with early endoscopy for evaluation of the graft and anastomosis after esophagectomy and reconstruction. METHODS: From a population of 479 patients who underwent esophagectomy during the years 1996-2003, we identified 102 patients who had endoscopy within 21 days of operation. RESULTS: Endoscopy was performed a median of 9 days after operation. Graft ischemia, anastomotic leak, or both were found in 63 of the 102 patients. Reoperation was necessary in 27% of these patients, including graft removal in nine patients. In 39 patients, endoscopy demonstrated a healthy graft; only one of these patients (2.6%) required reoperation. No patient with ischemia judged insufficient to warrant graft removal on initial endoscopy subsequently lost their graft. There were no complications or anastomotic injuries associated with early endoscopy. CONCLUSION: Endoscopy early after esophagectomy is safe and provides accurate and reliable identification of graft ischemia that can be used to guide the treatment of these patients.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is an evolving surgical alternative to traditional open esophagectomy. Despite considerable technical challenges, it was hypothesized that MIE could be performed effectively by surgeons experienced in open esophageal resection and advanced laparoscopic surgery. The authors report their experience with 25 patients who underwent MIE for esophageal disease. METHODS: A multidisciplinary esophageal cancer team evaluated all the patients enrolled in this institutional review board-approved retrospective review study. Over an 18-month period, 25 consecutive patients (22 men and 3 women; mean age, 62 years; range, 48-77 years) with resectable esophageal cancer underwent MIE. Six patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The preoperative diagnoses were adenocarcinoma (64%, n = 16), high-grade dysplasia (20%, n = 5), and squamous cell cancer (16%, n = 4). The outcomes evaluated included operative course, hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, pathologic stage, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: Two patients required conversion to open esophagectomy. Operative mortality was 4% (n = 1). The mean operative time was 350 min (range, 300-480), and the average blood loss was 200 ml. The patients remained ventilated for a median of 12 h, and the median intensive care unit utilization was 1 day. The median hospital length of stay was 9 days (range, 6-33 days). Major complications occurred in 32% of the patients. The anastomotic leak rate was 12%. Minor pulmonary complications occurred in 32% and atrial fibrillation in 16% of the patients. An anastomotic stricture developed in 24% of all the patients. One patient showed a positive proximal margin in the final pathology results. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a technically challenging procedure that can be performed safely at the Virginia Piper Cancer Institute. Optimal results require appropriate patient selection and a multidisciplinary team experienced in the management of esophageal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2006

Endoscopic ablation of intestinal metaplasia containing high-grade dysplasia in esophagectomy patients using a balloon-based ablation system.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the optimal treatment parameters for the ablation of intestinal metaplasia (IM) containing high-grade dysplasia (HGD) using a balloon-based ablation system for patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: Immediately before esophagectomy, patients underwent ablation of circumferential segments of the esophagus containing IM-HGD using the HALO360 system. The treatment settings were randomized to 10, 12, or 14 J/cm2 for two, three, or four applications. After esophagectomy, multiple sections from ablation zones were microscopically evaluated. Histologic end points included maximum ablation depth (histologic layer) and complete ablation of all IM-HGD (yes/no). RESULTS: Eight men with a mean age of 57 years (range, 45-71 years) were treated, and 10 treatment zones were created. There were no device-related adverse events. At resection, there was no evidence of a transmural thermal effect. Grossly, ablation zones were clearly demarcated sections of ablated epithelium. The maximum ablation depth was the lamina propria or muscularis mucosae. The highest energy (14 J/cm2, 4 applications) incurred edema in the superficial submucosa, but no submucosa ablation. Complete ablation of IM and HGD occurred in 9 of 10 ablation zones (90%), defined as complete removal of the epithelium with only small foci of "ghost cells" representing nonviable, ablated IM-HGD and demonstrating loss of nuclei and cytoarchitectural derangement. One focal area of viable IM-HGD remained at the margin of one ablation zone (12 J/cm2, 2 applications) because of incomplete overlap. CONCLUSION: Complete ablation of IM-HGD without ablation of submucosa is possible using the HALO360 system. Ablation depth is dose related and limited to the muscularis mucosae. In one patient, small residual foci of IM-HGD at the edge of the ablation zone were attributable to incomplete overlap, which can be avoided. This study, together with nonesophagectomy IM-HGD trials currently underway, will identify the optimal treatment parameters for IM-HGD patients who would otherwise undergo esophagectomy or photodynamic therapy.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Ivor-Lewis procedure is a radical, invasive, and effective procedure for the resection of most esophageal cancers. To minimize invasiveness, we performed thoracoscopic and video-assisted esophagectomy and mediastinal dissection for esophageal cancer. METHODS: From November 1995 to June 1997, 23 patients with intrathoracic esophageal cancer, excluding T4 cancers, underwent thoracoscopic and video-assisted esophagectomy. Bilateral cervical dissections were performed as well as preparation of the gastric tube and transhiatal dissection of the lower esophagus. The cervical esophagus was cut using a stapler knife, and esophageal reconstruction was performed through the retrosternal route or anterior chest wall. Next, thoracoscopic mediastinal dissection and esophagectomy were performed. RESULTS: The mean volume of blood loss was 163 +/- 122 ml; mean thoracoscopic surgery duration, 111 +/- 24 min; mean postoperative day for patients to start eating, 8 +/- 3 days; and mean hospital stay, 26 +/- 8 days. No patient developed systemic inflammatory response syndrome postoperatively. Tracheal injury occurred and was repaired during the thoracoscopic approach in one patient. No patients died within 30 days after surgery. Postoperative complications included transient recurrent nerve palsy in five patients, pulmonary secretion retention requiring tracheotomy in two, and chylothorax in one. Five patients died of cancer recurrence within 1 year of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our surgical experience with thoracoscopic and video-assisted esophagectomy indicate that it is a feasible and useful procedure.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗

PubMed2003

Hand-assisted endoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Radical esophagectomy is a highly invasive operation for esophageal cancer, and improved techniques are being sought to reduce the invasiveness of this procedure. We devised a method in which an assistant inserts their left hand into the thoracic cavity, and the operator inserts their left hand into the abdominal cavity through a small incision in the upper quadrant during an endoscopic procedure. Between 1996 and 1999, we performed endoscopic esophagectomy on 18 patients. The median number of mediastinal lymph nodes removed by thoracoscopic surgery was 20.1 +/- 9.4 and the median number of abdominal lymph nodes removed by laparoscopic surgery was 11.1 +/- 5.6. The number of nodes dissected by endoscopic surgery did not differ significantly from the number of nodes dissected by conventional thoracotomy with laparotomy. Our experience shows that endoscopic esophagectomy with reconstruction of the esophagus assisted by inserting the hand into the thoracic and abdominal cavity, for safety and certainty, is an effective technique that is much less invasive than radical esophagectomy performed by conventional thoracotomy with laparotomy.

Endoscopy↗

PubMed1991

Transient diminished airway protection after transhiatal esophagectomy.

Fifteen consecutive patients undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma were studied cineradiographically to evaluate postoperative pharyngeal function. Cinepharyngo-esophagograms were obtained preoperatively and 1 week (range: 6 to 10 days) and 1 month (range: 18 to 52 days) postoperatively. One week after transhiatal esophagectomy, new radiographic swallowing abnormalities were identified in 10 patients (67%). The most common abnormalities observed were laryngeal penetration or aspiration (seven patients, 47%) and incomplete laryngeal elevation (five patients, 33%). Abnormal epiglottic tilt was seen in only two patients (13%). No postoperative pharyngeal retention and no cricopharyngeal obstruction to swallowed contrast was observed. One month after transhiatal esophagectomy, all radiographic swallowing abnormalities had resolved or improved. Laryngeal penetration or aspiration is common after transhiatal esophagectomy and is a consequence of diminished airway protection with incomplete laryngeal elevation rather than a result of esophageal obstruction with "spill-over" aspiration. These changes resolve or improve within the first postoperative month.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy: technique and initial results.

To reduce the high morbidity rate associated with esophageal surgery, we have developed a technique of thoracoscopic esophagectomy. A feasibility study was first carried out in an animal model and a specific instrument was developed for this purpose. Esophagectomy using a right thoracoscopic approach was attempted in 15 patients, 13 males and 2 females whose average age was 48 years. Indications consisted of squamous cell carcinoma in 10 patients, adenocarcinoma in 1, and caustic stenosis in 4. We used a technique that consisted of double-lumen tracheal intubation and the creation of five ports. The whole esophagus was mobilized thoracoscopically and the esophagectomy was completed through the abdomen. The reconstruction was achieved using a gastric pull-through, and the anastomosis was made in the neck. There were three failures: in 1 patient there was a large tumor, making the exposure unsafe, and, in 2 patients, incomplete lung collapse made exposure of the posterior mediastinum difficult. These 3 cases were converted into a thoracotomy. The thoracoscopic dissection was successful in the remaining 12 patients. The average time of the thoracoscopic stage was 125 minutes. The postoperative course was uneventful in 10 patients. Two patients had a left atelectasis. Although our series is limited, these initial results indicate that thoracoscopic esophagectomy is feasible. However, further evaluation of the technique is needed to assess its benefit in terms of respiratory morbidity.

Burns, Chemical↗

PubMed2006

[Minimally invasive esophagectomy: prospective evaluation of laparoscopic gastric mobilization].

OBJECTIVE: Esophagectomy carries high morbidity, mainly due to respiratory complications. In digestive surgery, postoperative outcome is generally improved by minimally invasive surgery. A prospective study was conducted to evaluate feasibility and postoperative outcome of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). METHODS: From July 2001 to June 2004, 20 patients underwent esophagectomy with laparoscopic gastric mobilization (LGM) for squamous cell carcinoma (N=11), adenocarcinoma (N=7), Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia (N=1), and long peptic stricture (N=1). Tumours (N=19) were located on the cardia (N=5), on the lower third of the oesophagus (N=10), on the median third (N=3), and on the upper third (N=1). Following LGM, transthoracic (N=19) or transhiatal (N=1) oesophagectomy was performed. RESULTS: Complete LGM was achieved in all cases. Mean operative time for LGM was 197+/-48 minutes. In the 19 patients operated for tumours, 18 underwent R0 resection. Eleven patients (55%) developed postoperative complications, mainly (30%) respiratory. Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 patients, with favourable outcome. Pylorospasm (N=1) was the only intraabdominal complication. One patient died (5%). CONCLUSION: Esophagectomy with LGM is feasible with few specific complications. However, no decrease in morbidity could be observed with this technique. Further studies are required to evaluate if thoracoscopy could improve the postoperative course after LGM and to validate oncologic safety of MIE.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

Laparoscopic transhiatal subtotal esophagectomy for the treatment of advanced megaesophagus.

BACKGROUND: Chagas' disease affects about 5 to 8 million individuals in Brazil, with 5% to 8% of them developing megaesophagus. In view of the transformation of the esophagus into an inert tube unable to propel food to the stomach, and in order to prevent complications, the elected treatment for advanced megaesophagus is subtotal esophagectomy. We evaluate here the outcome of laparoscopic transhiatal subtotal esophagectomy in the treatment of advanced megaesophagus. METHODS: Thirty patients with advanced esophagopathy, 26 with chagasic and 4 with idiopathic megaesophagus, were submitted to transhiatal subtotal esophagectomy without thoracotomy through laparoscopy and left cervicotomy. Contrast exams of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum (ESD), upper digestive tract endoscopy (UDE), esophageal electromanometry, and 24-hour pHmetry were performed during the preoperative and postoperative period. With respect to the surgical technique, pyloroplasty was not performed. The cervical esophagus was dissected through a left cervicotomy and the esophagogastric anastomosis was performed between the cervical segment of the esophagus and the posterior wall of the stomach. RESULTS: No death or conversion to open surgery occurred in the present series. Complications were observed in 8 patients (26.7%): 6 cases of pneumothorax (20%), 2 of cervical fistulas (6.7%), 7 of transient dysphonia (23.3%), and 1 of anastomotic esophagogastric stenosis (3.3%). One (3.3%) of the patients developed dysphagia for solid food after 36 months despite normal ESD, UDE, electromanometry, and 24-hour pHmetry. CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that laparoscopic transhiatal subtotal esophagectomy is a feasible and safe procedure with an excellent postoperative outcome.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Preoperative laparoscopic ligation of the left gastric vessels in preparation for esophagectomy.

Anastomotic leak is a major cause for morbidity after esophagectomy. The cause is believed to be ischemia of the gastric conduit. Preoperative embolization of the left gastric vessels in preparation for esophagectomy has been shown to improve collateral blood flow of the gastric conduit and may reduce the frequency of anastomotic dehiscence after esophagectomy. This report describes the technique of laparoscopic division of the left gastric vessels in 9 patients who underwent pre-esophagectomy staging laparoscopy. Our initial experience demonstrates that laparoscopic ligation of the left gastric artery is a safe alternative to embolization and can be performed in conjunction with staging laparoscopy for patients with esophageal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

Fentanyl-induced hemodynamic changes after esophagectomy or cardiac surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to characterize the hemodynamic response to propofol vs propofol with fentanyl when used for sedation after esophagectomy or cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: University Hospital, Intensive Care Unit. PATIENTS: Thirty patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery and 26 patients undergoing esophagectomy were examined. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive propofol (0.5 mg/kg bolus over 10 minutes, followed by continuous infusion at 1 mg/kg per hour) with or without fentanyl (2.0 microg/kg per hour) to achieve sedation overnight while in the intensive care unit. Randomization was performed in a double-blind manner. MEASUREMENT: Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was monitored throughout the treatment period, and sedation level was measured. Sedation level was targeted to achieve a Ramsay score of 4. MAIN RESULTS: The number of patients experiencing a greater than 20% drop in baseline MAP was higher in cardiac patients receiving propofol alone (11 of 15 patients, 73%) than in cardiac patients receiving propofol with fentanyl (4 of 15 patients, 27%). Furthermore, the time of optimal sedation was lower in the cardiac patients who received propofol than in cardiac patients who received propofol with fentanyl group (propofol alone, 79%; propofol with fentanyl, 88%). In contrast, there was no difference in the number of esophagectomy patients experiencing a greater than 20% drop in baseline MAP or in the mean time of optimal sedation when comparing the 2 treatment regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol has a differential effect on hemodynamics and sedation when comparing patients after cardiac surgery and esophagectomy.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed2004

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for caustic esophageal stricture in children.

Esophageal stricture after lye ingestion in children is the most frequent indication for esophagectomy in children, but this operation entails significant risks for complications. With continuing advances in minimally invasive technology, complex procedures such as esophagectomy can be performed using small incisions, with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality. Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy is limited and has involved thoracoscopic dissection with the addition of laparotomy for gastric mobilization. The authors report a case of intractable caustic esophageal stricture in a child treated by a totally minimally invasive esophagectomy through a combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic approach. In adult patients, this procedure has been associated with decreased hospital stay and more rapid return to normal activities, and we believe similar benefits will be obtained in children. Until further studies are done to show the advantage over the standard open technique, this procedure should be performed only in centers with experience in open esophageal surgery in children as well as by surgeons with advanced thoracoscopic and laparoscopic skills.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Selective management of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to analyze our experience with management of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy. METHODS: All patients who had intrathoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy were reviewed. Management and factors affecting outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: From March 1993 through February 2003, 761 patients had esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis at our institution. Forty-eight (6.3%) patients had an anastomotic leak; one refused authorization to review his medical record and was excluded from further analysis. Twenty-four (51.1%) patients had a contained leak. Twenty-seven (57.4%) patients were managed nonoperatively. Twenty (42.6%) patients required surgical intervention that included primary anastomotic repair in 14 patients, reinforcement of the anastomosis with viable tissue in 6 patients, and esophageal diversion in 2 patients. A single reoperation was done in 15 patients, and 5 patients had 2 reoperations. Median hospitalization in the reoperative group was 31 days (range, 15-97 days) and 20 days (range, 10-42 days) in the nonoperative group ( P = .0037). Four (8.5%) patients died. Cause of death was sepsis in 2 patients and multiorgan failure and myocardial infarction in 1 patient each. At follow-up (median, 8 months; range, 1-120 months), 10 (58.8%) patients in the reoperative group were eating a normal diet and 5 (29.4%) patients required at least one dilatation compared with 20 (76.9%) patients in the nonoperative group who were eating a normal diet and 9 (34.6%) who required at least one dilatation. A noncontained leak had an adverse effect on long-term survival ( P = .04). CONCLUSION: Intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Contained leaks often can be managed nonoperatively. When surgical management is required, esophagogastric continuity can often be maintained in the majority of patients. Long-term functional results are satisfactory and similar in both the reoperative and nonoperative groups. However, a noncontained leak adversely affected long-term survival.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2004

Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.

BACKGROUND: Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy is often troubled with anastomotic leak resulting in local sepsis, postoperative stricture, and prolonged hospitalization. We compared the anastomotic outcomes and clinical course of esophagectomy patients undergoing total mechanical stapled esophagogastric anastomosis versus a partial handsewn/mechanical stapled cervical anastomotic technique. METHODS: One hundred eighty-one patients underwent transhiatal (N=146) or 3-field (abdomen/chest/neck incisions) (N=35) esophagectomy. A total mechanical stapled anastomosis was accomplished in 125 patients. A handsewn/mechanical stapled anastomosis was performed in 56 patients. The total mechanical stapled anastomosis was accomplished by using the endoscopic gastrointestinal stapler to construct the posterolateral aspect and a linear stapler to close the anterior aspect of the anastomosis. Total mechanical stapled anastomosis patients had the endoscopic gastrointestinal stapler also used to divide the left gastric vessels and the short gastric mesentery for gastric mobilization. Anastomotic outcomes were analyzed by the leak rate (contrast study) and the need of serial dilations in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Total mechanical stapled technique after esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis appears to be effective in reducing hospitalization and anastomotic complications compared to partial or complete handsewn techniques. Liberal use of endoscopic staplers might shorten operative time. Esophageal surgeons should be aware of the advantages and become skilled with these techniques.

Aged↗