PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Low Back Pain”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed2007

Adaptive changes in postural strategy selection in chronic low back pain.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients achieve postural stability during challenging stance conditions by increasing sway speed. We investigated the mechanisms underlying this behavior, and whether postural strategy selection may be influenced by short-term experience of postural perturbation. Thirteen CLBP patients and thirteen age-matched controls underwent posturography tests. Subjects were asked to stand quietly: (a) with eyes open and eyes closed, and (b) while expecting a series of four backward translations of the support surface. Data from condition (a) was subjected to sway density analysis (SDA). This computes the number of consecutive spaces and respectively time samples during which center of pressure (COP) displacements remained inside a 2.5 mm radius. Three parameters of this analysis were considered: the mean number of peaks (MP), reflecting the time spent by COP in regions of stability, the mean time between peaks (MT) relating to the rate of production of posturographic commands, and the mean spatial distance (MD), reflecting the distance between stable regions. In condition (b) the mean COP positions were analyzed during the time (500 ms) preceding each translation. The MD was significantly increased in the CLBP group as compared to controls (P < 0.01), while the MP and MT did not present any significant difference. The expectation of backward translations initially produced a different COP positioning between the two groups (P < 0.0001) which decreased with repetition of platform translations (controls: PDelta1-4 < 0.002; patients: PDelta1-4 < 0.005). The findings show that the timing and the rate of the balance motor commands is comparable between the two groups. On the other hand, there is greater distance between regions of stability in the patient group. Such modification of motor control patterns might be the consequence of a reweighting of sensory input, possibly due to a deterioration of its reliability. Platform translation findings show that both groups aimed at optimizing their posture selection strategy based on prior testing experience. CLBP patients make use of a different postural motor strategy to maintain quiet stance. This is probably the consequence of an imprecise internal estimate of body sway, due to reduced accuracy in the sensory integration process.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2002

Validity of the French-language version of the Quebec back pain disability scale in low back pain patients in France.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives were to evaluate the acceptability in France of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) in its original French-language version and to study its correlational validity against indicators of impairment, pain, disability, psychological status, and perceived health status. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with chronic low back pain were recruited at the rheumatology outpatient clinic of a French hospital. A physical examination was performed for determination of an impairment score, and scales were completed for pain (visual analog scale and Saint-Antoine Questionnaire), disability (QBPDS and Dallas Scale [DS]), perceived health status (Nottingham Health Profile, NHP), and psychological status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS). RESULTS: Acceptability, internal consistency, and content validity of the QBPDS were satisfactory. Investigation of correlational validity showed good agreement with the DPQ (r = 0.755) and NHP (r = 0.739) and fair agreement with the impairment score (r = 0.449), the VAS pain score (r = 0.448), and the HADS score (r = 0.473). The QBPDS showed good discriminating power. Validity of the QBPDS was confirmed. DISCUSSION: Our results confirm the good measurement properties of the original French-language version of the QBPDS in French hospital-clinic patients with chronic low back pain. Comparison of the QBPDS and DPQ in this study shows that the QBPDS is better for evaluating disability, whereas the DPQ evaluates the overall, functional, psychological, and social impact of low back pain.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Interexaminer reliability and discriminant validity of inclinometric measurement of lumbar rotation in chronic low-back pain patients and subjects without low-back pain.

The interexaminer reliability of an inclinometer procedure to measure lumbar rotation was evaluated by two chiropractic clinicians who examined 25 chronic (greater than 6 months) low-back pain patients and 25 subjects without low-back pain. These groups were compared for differences in mean left, right, and total rotation. Patients who had lumbar spinal surgery were excluded. Twenty-eight men and 22 women, ranging in age from 28-38 years, were evaluated. Reliability between examiners was evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient. All coefficients were significant (P less than 0.01). Errors in prediction and examiner disagreement were evaluated by the standard error of estimate and the interexaminer measurement error. The standard errors of estimate (range: 1.4-4.4) and the interexaminer measurement errors (range: 3.8-10.4) were large compared to the scale of measurement. An analysis of variance of differences between the chronic low-back pain patients and asymptomatics revealed significantly more left rotation in the asymptomatic subjects (F = 8.4; df = 1; P less than 0.006). Also, there was significantly more total rotation in the asymptomatic subjects (F = 4.143; df = 1; P less than 0.048). However, because of the large error attributed to this procedure, it is not possible to say whether the difference between the two groups is a result of the large error or some "real" difference. Therefore, the procedure described in this study should not be used as a clinical outcome measure.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Labour pain: correlations with menstrual pain and acute low-back pain before and during pregnancy.

Low-back pain is a major component of labour pain in a substantial number of women. The purpose of this study was to determine whether episodes of acute low-back pain prior to pregnancy is a predictor of low-back pain during labour. 114 women received the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) during labour and were asked to describe the pain separately for front and back contraction pain or continuous pain. The day after the birth of the child the women were interviewed to determine whether they had (a) a history of episodes of acute low-back pain before pregnancy, (b) low-back pain during pregnancy, and (c) low-back pain during menstruation. The results show that episodic low-back pain before pregnancy is not correlated with any aspect of labour pain. However, it is significantly correlated with episodes of low-back pain during pregnancy. In contrast, low-back pain during menstruation is significantly correlated with labour pain scores recorded for back and front contraction pain as well as for continuous back pain. The significant correlation of labour pain with back pain during menstruation suggests that both share a common underlying mechanism. Similarly, the correlation of low-back pain during pregnancy with episodes of acute low-back pain before pregnancy suggests that the strain on back muscles during pregnancy may activate the mechanisms that underlie the usual forms of low-back pain.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1998

The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of low back pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults.

STUDY DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional, mailed survey. OBJECTIVES: To determine the lifetime, 6-month period, and point prevalence of low back pain and its related disability among Saskatchewan adults and to investigate the presence and strength of selective response bias. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There have been many reports of the prevalence of low back pain in different populations, and the estimates vary widely depending on case definition. However, most studies fail to differentiate between trivial and disabling back pain, which raises the issue of the usefulness of these estimates. No studies have yet documented the prevalence of graded low back pain severity and its related disability in a North American, general, population-based survey. METHODS: The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey was mailed to a probability sample of 2184 Saskatchewan adults between 20 and 69 years of age. Fifty-five percent of the eligible population responded to the survey. Respondents were compared with nonrespondents, and the presence of selective response bias by back pain status was investigated by wave analysis. The point and lifetime prevalence of low back pain was determined by simple questions, and the 6-month period prevalence of low back pain was determined by the Chronic Pain Questionnaire. All estimates were age standardized to the Saskatchewan population. RESULTS: The authors estimate that at the time of the survey 28.4% (95% confidence interval, 25.6-31.1) of the Saskatchewan adult population were experiencing low back pain, and 84.1% (95% confidence interval, 81.9-86.3) had experienced it during their lifetime. Overall, 48.9% (95% confidence interval, 45.9-52.0) of the population had experienced low intensity/low-disability low back pain in the previous 6 months, 12.3% (95% confidence interval, 10.3-14.4) had experienced high-intensity/low-disability low back pain, and an additional 10.7% (95% confidence interval, 8.8-12.5) had experienced high-disability low back pain in the previous 6 months. There was little variation in the estimates over age groups, but women experienced more high-disability back pain than men. There was no evidence of selective response bias by low back pain status in the survey. CONCLUSION: Low-intensity/low-disability low back pain is a common problem in the general population. Approximately 11% of the adult population studied had been disabled by low back pain in the previous 6 months.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Interdisciplinary perspectives on mechanisms and management of low back pain.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is one of the most pervasive and costly problems facing medicine today. In addition to personal suffering, CLBP accounts for a greatly disproportionate amount of consumer health care over-utilization, employee absenteeism, lowered work productivity, disability and compensation payments. Recent research in the area has called attention to the complex nature of the problem and the need for an interdisciplinary approach to identification and management. Toward this end, a panel of health care professionals with skill in the assessment and treatment of chronic pain was convened on November 17, 1988. Sponsored by the Institute for Behavioral Medicine in Providence and with funding from the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Stroke and Trauma Program, the purpose of the panel discussion was to bring together clinicians and researchers from distinctly different specialties but who all work with CLBP patients. Topics of discussion included etiology, current status of medical diagnostics and treatments for chronic pain, conceptual and systems issues, and directions for future research.

Back Pain↗
PubMed1983

Hypnosis compared to relaxation in the outpatient management of chronic low back pain.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) presents a problem of massive dimensions. While inpatient approaches have been evaluated, outpatient treatment programs have received relatively little examination. Hypnosis and relaxation are two powerful techniques amenable to outpatient use. Seventeen outpatient subjects suffering from CLBP were assigned to either Self-Hypnosis (n = 9) or Relaxation (n = 8) treatments. Following pretreatment assessment, all subjects attended a single placebo session in which they received minimal EMG feedback. One week later the subjects began eight individual weekly treatment sessions. Subjects were assessed on a number of dependent variables at pretreatment, following the placebo phase, one week after the completion of treatment, and three months after treatment ended. Subjects in both groups showed significant decrements in such measures as average pain rating, pain as measured by derivations from the McGill Pain Questionnaire, level of depression, and length of pain analog line. Self-Hypnosis subjects reported less time to sleep onset, and physicians rated their use of medication as less problematic after treatment. While both treatments were effective, neither proved superior to the other. The placebo treatment produced nonsignificant improvement.

Back Pain↗
PubMed2000

Neck or shoulder pain and low back pain in Finnish adolescents.

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and determinants of self-reported neck or shoulder pain (NSP) and low back pain (LBP) among 12-18-year-olds. A questionnaire was mailed to a nationally representative sample of 11,276 12-, 14-, 16- and 18-year-olds in 1991. The response rate was 77%. NSP was perceived at least once a week by 15% of 12-18-year-olds and LBP by 8%. Both symptoms were more prevalent among girls than among boys, and the prevalence increased with age. Among the determinants investigated, the number of perceived psychosomatic symptoms had the strongest association with NSP and LBP. Our study confirmed the co-morbidity of NSP and LBP, and indicated that NSP is more frequent than believed among 16-18-year-old girls. The strong association of psychosomatic symptoms with NSP and LBP suggests that the latter two pain states could be more psychosomatic than nociceptive in character.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Effects of recreational physical activity and back exercises on low back pain and psychological distress: findings from the UCLA Low Back Pain Study.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to estimate the effects of recreational physical activity and back exercises on low back pain, related disability, and psychological distress among patients randomized to chiropractic or medical care in a managed care setting. METHODS: Low back pain patients (n=681) were randomized and followed for 18 months. Participation in recreational physical activities, use of back exercises, and low back pain, related disability, and psychological distress were measured at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at 6, 12, and 18 months. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to estimate adjusted associations of physical activity and back exercises with concurrent and subsequent pain, disability, and psychological distress. RESULTS: Participation in recreational physical activities was inversely associated--both cross-sectionally and longitudinally--with low back pain, related disability, and psychological distress. By contrast, back exercise was positively associated--both cross-sectionally and longitudinally--with low back pain and related disability. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that individuals with low back pain should refrain from specific back exercises and instead focus on nonspecific physical activities to reduce pain and improve psychological health.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Low back pain in eight areas of Britain.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the geographical variation in low back pain and associated disability in Britain. DESIGN: This was a cross sectional survey with information collected by postal questionnaire. SETTING: General practices in seven British towns and one rural district. SUBJECTS: 1172 men and 1495 women aged 20-59 years were selected from the age-sex registers of 136 general practitioners in the study areas. MAIN RESULTS: The overall lifetime and one year period prevalences of low back pain were 58.3% and 36.1%. Rates in men and women were similar. Symptoms were more common in men with manual occupations than in those with non-manual jobs, but in women there was no clear trend in relation to social class. Geographical differences in prevalence were small, but the threshold for consulting general practitioners about symptoms varied markedly from place to place. After allowance for age, sex, social class, and severity of symptoms, subjects in the northern towns of Arbroath and Peterlee who had suffered from low back pain in the past year were three to four times as likely to have consulted their doctor about the problem as those living in the southern towns of St Austell and Dorking. Consultation rates in the Midlands were intermediate. CONCLUSIONS: Geographical variation in rates of general practice consultation for low back pain in Britain is due largely to differences in patient behaviour once symptoms have developed. The distribution of important causes of low back back pain across the country is probably fairly uniform.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Pelvic pain and low back pain in pregnant women--an epidemiological study.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic Pain in Pregnancy (PPP) has been diagnosed increasingly often in Norway. The relation to Low Back Pain (LBP) is unclear. METHODS: The answers to 5,400 questionnaires were collected from Norwegian women shortly after delivery, and the occurrence of PPP and LBP in relation to various characteristics was studied. RESULTS: 21% of primipara had had both PPP and LBP, whereas 51% had had neither. The figures in multipara were 31% and 33%. After stratification by parity the frequency of both types of pain decreased with increasing age. The largest occupational risk factor of PPP and/or LBP was having to twist or bend several times an hour. This may be preventable. Partial regression coefficients for parity, smoking, and weight of newborn were significantly larger with PPP than with LBP. CONCLUSION: The association of PPP and LBP to occupational exposure was similar. The statistical explanatory pattern, and thus possibly the etiology, is different in the two conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Discogenic pain in acute nonspecific low-back pain.

Acute nonspecific low-back pain is characterized by the sudden onset and severe unendurable low-back pain without radicular pain or neurological deficit in the lower extremities. The study was carried out using 55 patients who visited our hospital for acute nonspecific low-back pain, who exhibited degeneration on T2-weighted MR images, and underwent intradiscal injection of local anesthetics,steroid and contrast medium. Intervertebral disc sites with an obvious enhanced region in the posterior annulus of the disc on enhanced T1-weighted MR images was selected for intradiscal injection. When no enhanced region was detected, the most severely degenerated disc on T2-weighted MR images was selected. Acute nonspecific low-back pain with an improvement rate of 70% or higher 5 min after injection was judged to be discogenic. The clinical characteristics and pathogenesis of discogenic acute nonspecific low-back pain were investigated. Forty of the 55 patients (73%) had discogenic acute nonspecific low-back pain. As for the characteristics of patients, the mean age was 37 years, and onset occurred upon casual daily movements in 18 patients (45%). Nineteen patients (48%) had bilateral low-back pain, and 29 patients (73%) had no tenderness in the paravertebral muscles. On plain X-ray radiograms, degeneration of the disc was normal or mild in 36 patients(91%). On the discograms, a radial tear extending to the posterior annulus was noted in all patients, but epidural leakage was seen only in six patients (15%). The degree of disc degeneration on T2-weighted MR images (Gibson's classification) was grade 3 in 30 patients (75%). Gadolinium-DTPA enhanced T1-weighted MR images showed an obvious enhanced region in the posterior annulus of the intervertebral disc in 19 patients (48%). As for the clinical characteristics of discogenic acute nonspecific low-back pain, the relatively young adult patients had no tenderness in the paravertebral muscles, and showed moderately degenerated intervertebral discs. The pathogenesis of discogenic acute nonspecific low-back pain is mostly considered to be a re-rupture in an asymptomatic ruptured region in the posterior annulus, repaired by granulation tissue, in a moderately degenerated intervertebral disc with a radial tear.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1991

Personality traits in patients with acute low-back pain. A comparison with chronic low-back pain patients.

This study investigates the possibilities to identify, within a group of acute low-back pain patients, individuals with psychogenic etiology to pain. 26 acute back pain patients and 25 healthy control subjects were tested with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Hysteria: (Hs), Hypochondria (Hy), Depression (D); Cesarek-Marke Personality Scale: Aggression (Agg), Defence of status (Dst), Guilt (Gui); Mood Adjective Check List: (Hedonism, Activity, Calmness = Hed, Act, Clm) and a 'pain questionnaire' including 'pain drawing'. Differences between groups and correlation patterns between test variables indicate that a combination of Hs, Hy, D, Dst, Gui, Hed, Act, Clm as well as predisposition to somatization, Som (a quantification of pain drawing) provides a useful predictive screening instrument.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go?

The present study examined the psychometric characteristics of a "core-set" of six individual questions (on pain, function, symptom-specific well-being, work disability, social disability and satisfaction) for use in low back pain (LBP) outcome assessment. A questionnaire booklet was administered to 277 German-speaking LBP patients with a range of common diagnoses, before and 6 months after surgical (N=187) or conservative (N=90) treatment. The core-set items were embedded in the booklet alongside validated 'reference' questionnaires: Likert scales for back/leg pain; Roland and Morris disability scale; WHO Quality of Life scale; Psychological General Well-Being Index. A further 45 patients with chronic LBP completed the booklet twice in 1-2 weeks. The minimal reliability (similar to Cronbach's alpha) for each core item was 0.42-0.78, increasing to 0.84 for a composite index score comprising all items plus an additional question on general well-being ('quality of life'). Floor or ceiling effects of 20-50% were observed for some items before surgery (function, symptom-specific well-being) and some items after it (disability, function). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ("test-retest reliability") was moderate to excellent (ICC, 0.67-0.95) for the individual core items and excellent (ICC, 0.91) for the composite index score. With the exception of "symptom-specific well-being", the correlations between each core item and its corresponding reference questionnaire ("validity") were between 0.61 and 0.79. Both the composite index and the individual items differentiated (P<0.001) between the severity of the back problem in surgical and conservative patients (validity). The composite index score had an effect size (sensitivity to change) of 0.95, which was larger than most of the reference questionnaires (0.47-1.01); for individual core items, the effect sizes were 0.52-0.87. The core items provide a simple, practical, reliable, valid and sensitive assessment of outcome in LBP patients. We recommend the widespread and consistent use of the core-set items and their composite score index to promote standardisation of outcome measurements in clinical trials, multicentre studies, routine quality management and surgical registry systems.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Psychological factors in low back pain.

Even though low back pain is one of the commonest diseases, little is known about its aetiology, its natural history and its treatment. This may explain why the myth exists that low back pain is often psychogenic in origin or that psychological factors are often at least involved in low back pain. The aim of the early studies on low back pain and psychological factors was to try to divide these pains into functional (psychogenic) and organic, according to the aetiology. The aim of the studies was to predict the quality and success of the treatment. According to the current view, it is not meaningful to try to dichotomize low back pain in this way. According to the earlier literature, both conversion hysteria and psychoses were the main cause of psychogenic low back pain. More recent studies do not, however, support this view. It seems that the most common psychiatric disturbances associated with low back pain are neuroses and neurotic traits. There is controversy as to how often psychological factors are involved in low back pain. Population studies have shown that this association may be weaker than was thought earlier. It seems that individuals who suffer from low back pain, more often than others, have aggression problems and weaknesses in their ego function and more frequently have problems in interpersonal relations and sexual problems. There is no clear picture of what kind of psychotherapy is best suited to low back pain patients who have mental problems. The results attained by learning therapy and also with multidisciplinary ward programs seem quite promising.

Back Pain↗
PubMed2000

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain among working age adults.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation programs are widely applied for chronic low back pain patients. The biopsychosocial approach for low back pain could also be considered to prevent chronicity by carrying out the rehabilitation if the acute pain is prolonged. Nevertheless multidisciplinary treatment programmes are often laborious and long processes and require good collaboration between the patient, the rehabilitation team and the work place. By workplace visits and close relationship with occupational health care one might expect results in terms of patients working ability. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain among working age adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: The reviewed studies for this structured Cochrane review were identified from electronic bibliographic databases, the Science Citation Index, reference checking and consulting experts in the rehabilitation field. The original search was planned and performed for more broad area of musculoskeletal disorders. Trials on subacute low back pain were separated afterwards. SELECTION CRITERIA: From all references found in our original search we selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Trials had to assess the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation for working age patients suffering from subacute low back pain (more than 4 weeks but less than 3 months). The rehabilitation program was required to be multidisciplinary, i.e.; it had to consist of a physician's consultation plus either a psychological, social or vocational intervention, or a combination of these. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Four blinded reviewers selected the randomized controlled trials and controlled trials that met the specified inclusion criteria. Two experts in the field of rehabilitation evaluated the clinical relevance and applicability of the findings of the selected studies to actual clinical use. Two other blinded reviewers extracted the data and assessed the main results and the methodological quality of the studies using standardized forms. Finally, a qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate the level of scientific evidence for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation. MAIN RESULTS: After screening 1808 abstracts, and the references of 65 reviews, we found only 2 relevant studies that satisfied our criteria on subacute low back pain. They were both considered to be methodologically low quality randomized controlled trials. The clinical relevance of included studies was sufficient. The level of scientific evidence for the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation was moderate on subacute low back pain showing that multidisciplinary rehabilitation which includes workplace visit or more comprehensive occupational health care intervention helps patients to return to work faster, makes sick leaves less and alleviates subjective disability. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there is moderate evidence of positive effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain and workplace visit increases the effectiveness. But because this evidence is based on the trials that had some methodological shortcomings and several expensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes are commonly used for common subacute low back problems, there is an obvious need for high quality trials in this field.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1991

Effects of spinal flexion and extension exercises on low-back pain and spinal mobility in chronic mechanical low-back pain patients.

It has been estimated that one fourth to one half of all patients treated in physical therapy clinics suffer from low-back pain. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of spinal flexion (Group I) and extension (Group II) exercises on low-back pain severity and thoracolumbar spinal mobility in chronic mechanical low-back pain patients. Both groups had significantly less low-back pain after treatment (P less than .10). There was no significant difference, however, between the spinal flexion and extension exercises in reduction of low-back pain severity. The results indicated a significant difference between the groups in increasing the sagittal mobility (P less than .10). The results did not indicate any significant difference between and within groups in increasing the coronal and transverse mobility of the thoracolumbar spine. Either the spinal flexion or extension exercises could be used to reduce chronic mechanical low-back pain severity, but the flexion exercises had an advantage in increasing the sagittal mobility within a short period of time.

Adult↗