SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Meta- analysis”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMed1991

A general parametric approach to the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Meta-analysis provides a systematic and quantitative approach to the summary of results from randomized studies. Whilst many authors have published actual meta-analyses concerning specific therapeutic questions, less has been published about comprehensive methodology. This article presents a general parametric approach, which utilizes efficient score statistics and Fisher's information, and relates this to different methods suggested by previous authors. Normally distributed, binary, ordinal and survival data are considered. Both the fixed effects and random effects model for treatments are described.

Humans↗

PubMed1991

[Endoscopic hemostasis for hemorrhagic gastroduodenal ulcer. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials].

To demonstrate the advantages of various endoscopic hemostatic methods (laser photocoagulation, electrocautery, injection therapy) for bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer in patients at high risk for continued or recurrent bleeding, a critical review of published randomized clinical trials was made with meta-analytic methods. Only the 15 clinical trials dealing either with patients with visible non bleeding vessels or spurting arterial bleeding were included. Regarding visible non bleeding vessels, the meta-analysis of five trials on electrocautery and two trials on sclerotherapy showed a significant reduction in rebleeding rates in the treatment group compared with untreated controls. The odds ratios were 4 (95 percent confidence levels (CL): 2.4-6.9) (P less than 0.001) and 6.8 (95 percent CL: 2.7-17.2) (P less than 0.001), respectively. As well, the meta-analysis of four trials on electrocautery and the two trials on sclerotherapy showed a significant reduction in the number of emergency surgical operations in the treated groups a compared with the untreated groups. The odds ratios were 5.5 (95 percent confidence levels (CL): 2.7-11.3) (P less than 0.001) and 6.1 (95 percent CL: 2.1-17.8) (P less than 0.001), respectively. Meta-analysis did not show any advantage for laser, electrocautery, or sclerotherapy in terms of mortality. Indirect meta-analysis did not reveal any difference between electrocautery and sclerotherapy. Regarding spurting arterial bleeding, meta-analysis of the two YAG laser trials, the two Argon laser trials, and the two electrocautery trials showed a significant reduction of rebleeding or continued bleeding in the treatment groups as compared with the control groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Duodenal Ulcer↗

PubMed1992

Importance of trends in the interpretation of an overall odds ratio in the meta-analysis of clinical trials.

This paper contains a proposition related to the publication of meta-analyses of clinical trials. We consider the situation where the results of a number of trials are summarized by a common or typical odds ratio. We show that stating such an odds ratio as the summary of evidence from a number of trials can be misleading if certain systematic differences between trials exist. In such cases the author should state not just one odds ratio but also its dependence on the relevant characteristics of the trials. In particular, we propose that those reporting a meta-analysis state in advance a (limited) number of variables to be considered for potential interaction with the exposure (risk factor or treatment) of interest. The list might include centre size and the odds in the placebo or control group if such an effect is a priori clinically plausible. The trials should be ordered according to each of these variables and a trend test for the odds ratio should be computed. Apart from a 'genuine' effect, an appreciable interaction could also be indicative of the (multiplicative) odds ratio being an inappropriate measure for the particular meta-analysis. Without any consideration as to the possibility of interaction, the meta-analysis should be considered incomplete. If such an interaction exists, the odds ratio should be stated as a function of the interacting variable, either as a formula or (preferably) in a table stating the odds ratio for a number of different values of the interacting variable, and not as a single summary statistic.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed1991

Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique.

Meta-analysis, a set of statistical tools for combining and integrating the results of independent studies of a given scientific issue, can be useful when the stringent conditions under which such integration is valid are met. In this report we point out the difficulties in obtaining sound meta-analyses of either controlled clinical trials or epidemiological studies. We demonstrate that hastily or improperly designed meta-analyses can lead to results that may not be scientifically valid. We note that much care is typically taken when meta-analysis is applied to the results of clinical trials. The Food and Drug Administration, for example, requires strict adherence to the principles we discuss in this paper before it allows a drug's sponsor to use a meta-analysis of separate clinical studies in support of a New Drug Application. Such care does not always carry over to epidemiological studies, as demonstrated by the 1986 report of the National Research Council concerning the purported association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer. On the basis of a meta-analysis of 13 studies, 10 of which were retrospective and the remaining 3 prospective in nature, the Council concluded that non-smokers who are exposed to environmental tobacco smoke are at greater risk of acquiring lung cancer than non-smokers not so exposed. In our opinion, this conclusion in unwarranted given the poor quality of the studies on which it is based.

Bias↗

PubMed2026

Systematic Review and Transcriptomic Meta-analysis of Environmental Enrichment Reveal Core Molecular Programs of Brain Plasticity.

Environmental enrichment (EE) paradigms in rodents have long demonstrated that enhanced sensory, cognitive, social, and motor stimulation positively impacts brain function, improving learning, memory, and neuroplasticity. These effects have significant implications for understanding cognitive development and mitigating cognitive decline and brain aging. While numerous transcriptomic studies have explored EE-induced molecular changes, a unified view of the genes and pathways consistently modulated remains lacking. To address this gap, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We conducted a comprehensive PubMed search for all studies published up to February 2025 that matched all the following inclusion criteria: (1) employed EE paradigms; (2) were conducted on rodents; (3) utilized genome-wide transcriptomic methods; (4) examined brain regions or neuronal populations. The 323 retrieved articles were manually screened for relevance to the study aims and data availability. Datasets from 20 eligible RNA-seq reports were reprocessed using a unified analysis pipeline and subjected to a meta-analysis with three complementary statistical methods. Despite considerable heterogeneity across studies, our integrative analysis identified consistent gene expression signatures linked to synaptic function, plasticity and their transcriptional regulation. In particular, our findings highlight the upregulation of the activity-dependent transcriptional program, including Fos and Jun family members. These molecular insights advance our understanding of how EE impacts on neuronal and behavioral outcomes, and may inform therapeutic strategies aimed at replicating or enhancing EE benefits. To promote open science and foster further research, we developed an accessible web application, mEEtaBrain, that enables the neuroscience community to navigate and interrogate our meta-analysis results. Substantial methodological heterogeneity across source studies increased variability in the meta-analysis outcomes. The use of stressors or disease models, particularly in rat studies, introduced a major confounding factor and limited reliable interspecies comparison. Overall, the studies exhibited a low to moderate risk of bias.

Neuronal Plasticity↗

PubMed1991

Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis.

Using a meta-analytic procedure we have analysed 16 studies employing a simple unimanual reaction time (RT) paradigm and lateralized visual stimuli to provide an estimate of interhemispheric transfer time in normal right-handed subjects. We found a significant overall RT advantage of the left visual field over the right and of the right hand over the left. These asymmetries can be explained by a superiority of the right hemisphere for the detection of simple visual stimuli and by a corresponding superiority of the left hemisphere for the execution of the manual response, respectively. Alternatively, they may be interpreted as related to an asymmetry of interhemispheric transmission of visuomotor information, with transfer from the right hemisphere (side of stimulus entry) to the left (side of response generation) faster than in the reverse direction. Although a direct test of these hypotheses is still lacking, we think that the evidence available is more in keeping with the latter possibility.

Arousal↗

PubMed1991

Prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

This meta-analysis was performed to determine the efficacy of digoxin, verapamil, and beta-adrenoceptor blockers as prophylaxis against supraventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Randomized control trials were included if the electrocardiographic monitoring technique was clearly defined and extended through at least the first 3 postoperative days. Twenty-four of 69 identified studies were included in the final analysis. A summary odds ratio (OR) of the likelihood of developing SVAs after CABG in the treatment versus control groups was calculated. The pooled mean ventricular rate during SVA in patients who developed such an arrhythmia was also calculated. Neither digoxin nor verapamil reduced the likelihood of SVAs after CABG (digoxin: OR = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.62-1.49; verapamil: OR = 0.91, CI = 0.57-1.46). The likelihood of developing an SVA in patients treated with beta-blockers was markedly decreased compared with controls (OR = 0.28, CI = 0.21-0.36). The pooled ventricular rate when SVAs did occur was significantly lower in each of the treatment groups. Prophylactic beta-adrenoceptor blockers had a protective effect against the development of SVAs in a select population of patients undergoing CABG. No such beneficial effect was demonstrated for digoxin or verapamil. All three classes of agents reduced the ventricular rate in patients who developed the arrhythmia, although the ventricular rate reduction was not clinically optimal.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2026

Joint association of sedentary behaviour and physical activity with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies aimed to synthesize existing evidence on the joint association of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among adults. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for English studies published between January 2010 and February 2025 that examined the joint association of PA and SB (fatal and non-fatal) CVD among adults and pooled their results through meta-analyses using study-level data. Using findings from 17 studies, the pooled effect size for the lowest PA + highest SB group was 1.78 (95% CI: 1.59-2.00), suggesting increased risk for CVD compared with the reference group (i.e. highest PA + lowest SB). Compared with the same reference group, we found an increased risk for CVD in the lowest PA + lowest SB (HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.12-1.40) and the highest PA + highest SB (HR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06-1.27) groups. Subgroup analyses according to domains or types of PA and SB exposure, outcome measures, and exposure measurement method revealed a similar pattern. In conclusion, individuals with the lowest PA combined with the highest SB may experience an increased risk for CVD events compared with those with the highest PA and lowest SB. There was also an increased risk for individuals with a combination of either low PA + low SB and high PA + high SB, albeit to a lesser extent. Although substantial study-level heterogeneity exists, the results highlight the potential value of considering both behaviours jointly in relation to CVD risk.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effects of time-restricted eating on markers of glucose metabolism and regulation in individuals with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of time-restricted eating (TRE) on glucose metabolism and regulation in individuals with prediabetes (fasting blood glucose of 5.6-6.9 mmol/l or HbA1c of 39-47 mmol/mol [5.7-6.4%]) or type 2 diabetes (fasting blood glucose ≥7 mmol/l or HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol [6.5%]). METHODS: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 5 August 2025. Moreover, forward and backward citation searches were performed. Eligible studies were RCTs in adults with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes, lasting ≥2 weeks, reporting markers of glucose metabolism and regulation, comparing TRE (≤12 h eating window) with a non-time-restricted control diet. Studies involving pregnancy, other fasting regimens, or non-peer-reviewed publications were excluded. Data were pooled as weighted mean differences with 95% CIs using random-effects generic inverse variance models in Cochrane Review Manager Web, and results are presented as forest plots. The certainty of evidence was defined using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations methodology, and risk of bias was estimated by using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2). RESULTS: Out of 2043 records identified through the database search, as well as 1249 from forward and backward citation searches, ten RCTs including 599 participants were included. The mean length of the studies was 4 months, and the eating windows ranged from 4 to 10 h per day. The pooled meta-analysis showed no overall effect of TRE on HbA1c (-3.33 mmol/mol; 95% CI -6.87, 0.20 (-0.30% points; -0.63, 0.02); p=0.06, moderate certainty). Nevertheless, following stratification by subgroups, TRE resulted in a reduction in HbA1c of 0.93 mmol/mol (-1.70, -0.17 [-0.09% points; -0.16, -0.02]; p=0.02) in individuals with prediabetes but not in individuals with type 2 diabetes (-4.68 mmol/mol; -10.08, 0.72 (-0.43% points; -0.92, 0.07); p=0.09). TRE reduced fasting blood glucose in the pooled analysis (-0.30 mmol/l; -0.53, -0.07; p<0.01, moderate certainty) as well as in the subgroup analyses in individuals with prediabetes (-0.14 mmol/l; -0.27, -0.01; p=0.03) and with type 2 diabetes (-0.48 mmol/l; -0.78, -0.17; p<0.01). Moreover, TRE lowered body weight by 1.6 kg (-2.2, -1.0; p<0.001) in the pooled analysis. The evidence was limited by imprecision arising from wide confidence intervals in some of the included studies, which may be due to small sample sizes. Lastly, the effects of TRE on markers of insulin sensitivity, beta cell function and continuous glucose monitoring measurements were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that TRE reduces fasting blood glucose but not HbA1c. The subgroup analyses revealed that TRE improved HbA1c and fasting glucose in individuals with prediabetes and improved fasting glucose in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Future large-scale studies should investigate long-term effects of TRE in prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024523591 FUNDING: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. Three authors (JS, A-DT, THA) are employed at Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, a public hospital and research institution under the Capital Region of Denmark, partly funded by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation.

Humans↗

PubMed1991

Meta-analysis of desipramine as an adjunct in the treatment of cocaine addiction.

Many pharmacologic regimens have been recommended as supplemental treatment strategies for cocaine abuse. Using the technique of meta-analysis, we compared and combined the data from six studies to examine the efficacy of desipramine as an adjunctive treatment approach for cocaine addiction. These studies were randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of desipramine and involved a total of 200 cocaine-addicted patients. We found that desipramine is no better than placebo in retaining patients in treatment. However, while patients are in treatment, desipramine is helpful in promoting abstinence (p less than 0.001). There were several compromises made to use meta-analysis for these studies. These included comparing patient populations with different psychiatric and substance use diagnoses, comparing studies that used varying amounts of psychotherapy, and comparing studies that defined certain outcome variables in diverse ways. There are other limitations in the use of meta-analysis that were not specific to the studies we compared. These include such issues as statistical bias and publication bias. The purpose of this paper is to suggest the use of meta-analysis as one way to help the clinician evaluate the literature and to point out the areas of difficulty when assessing the literature.

Cocaine↗

PubMed2026

High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy and Non-Invasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the use of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in the management of acute respiratory failure (ARF) in the emergency department (ED). A comprehensive search of relevant sources was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing adult patients (≥ 18 years) treated in the ED for ARF and comparing HFNO to COT/NIV were included. The primary outcome was the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (IMV). Secondary outcomes included physiological and biochemical parameters, ICU admission, hospital length of stay, dyspnoea scores and mortality. A total of 17 RCTs (1955 patients) were included. There was a significant reduction in IMV favouring the HFNO group compared to COT and NIV (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.88). HFNO showed significant improvements in RR, SpO2, PaO2 and Modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale. Subgroup analysis showed reduced rates of IMV with HFNO compared to COT (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.91), but not compared to NIV (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42-1.14). HFNO additionally showed a reduction of IMV compared to NIV and COT in undifferentiated patients (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.93), but not in exacerbations of COPD or acute heart failure. Ten of the 17 studies had at least some concern for risk of bias, with several analyses having notable heterogeneity. HFNO showed a significant reduction in rates of IMV, improvement in peripheral oxygen saturations, PaO2, respiratory rate and patient dyspnoea scores compared to COT and NIV.

Humans↗

PubMed1989

Corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy in bacterial meningitis. A meta-analysis of clinical trials.

A meta-analysis of all nine available controlled trials of corticosteroids for adjunctive therapy for bacterial meningitis was performed. Risks of various outcomes were assessed for control and treatment groups from each study, and risk differences were determined. For each outcome a weighted average of the individual risk differences was calculated. The results show that corticosteroid administration did not reduce the risk of death or neurologic abnormality at hospital discharge or follow-up examination. Based on statistically combined results of the three most recent trials, there is evidence that dexamethasone reduces the risk of bilateral moderate or more severe hearing loss (risk difference, -9%; 95% confidence limits, -15% and -3%). However, this may be true only for children with meningitis caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b. There are inadequate data in adults or in children with meningitis due to other organisms to demonstrate the benefit of dexamethasone administration. Further study is necessary to fully assess the benefits and risks of corticosteroids for adjunctive therapy for bacterial meningitis.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

PubMed2026

Retrograde intrarenal surgery with flexible and navigable suction access sheaths vs mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large upper urinary tract stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and perioperative outcomes of contemporary flexible and navigable suction access sheath-assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery (FANS-RIRS) against percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the management of large upper urinary tract stones, as despite technological advances in RIRS such as high-powered lasers and FANS that have substantially enhanced its performance, current guidelines continue to recommend PCNL as first-line treatment for renal stones >2cm. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies performing direct comparisons of FANS-RIRS against PCNL in adult patients until September 2025. Primary outcomes included stone-free rates (SFRs) and need for ancillary procedures. Secondary outcomes included operative time, length of postoperative hospitalisation, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies (three randomised control trials, seven retrospective cohort studies) comprising 2347 patients were included; preoperative stone sizes were predominantly 2-3 cm. All PCNL procedures in the studies included were performed as mini-PCNL. The SFRs for FANS-RIRS were comparable with mini-PCNL across all stone sizes (odds ratio [OR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.17) and stones ≥2 cm (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-1.08), with low heterogeneity. Ancillary procedures rates were similar (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.61-2.44). FANS-RIRS was associated with significantly fewer overall complications, specifically smaller haemoglobin decline, need for transfusion, and shorter hospital stay. However, mini-PCNL demonstrated shorter operative times for stones ≥2 cm. Urosepsis rates were low and similar between both groups. Limitations include predominance of Asian studies, variability of practice, and inclusion of non-randomised studies. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary FANS-RIRS achieves SFRs comparable to mini-PCNL even for 2-3 cm stones, while offering superior safety profiles and shorter hospitalisation; this supports FANS-RIRS as a viable primary treatment in selected patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Risk of neurodevelopmental disorders associated with paternal use of valproate during spermatogenesis: a living meta-analysis-version 1.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of paternal use of valproate during spermatogenesis compared with paternal use of lamotrigine or levetiracetam on offspring risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). METHODS: Eligibility criteria: observational, peer-reviewed studies reporting neurodevelopmental outcomes of children exposed to paternal monotherapy use of valproate vs lamotrigine or levetiracetam during spermatogenesis. INFORMATION SOURCES: the databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were systematically searched from January 1995 to October 2025.Synthesis of results and risk of bias: a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled HRs and 95% CI, with heterogeneity assessed using I2 statistic for any NDD.We present a meta-analysis of observational, peer-reviewed studies reporting neurodevelopmental outcomes of children exposed to paternal monotherapy use of valproate versus lamotrigine or levetiracetam during spermatogenesis. Given the major regulatory implications of paternal valproate safety, the recent emergence of new population-based data, and the expectation of further large studies, we designed this work as a living systematic review and meta-analysis that will be updated as new eligible evidence becomes available. RESULTS: We identified three eligible studies based on data from (1) Norway and Sweden, (2) Norway and Taiwan and (3) Denmark. As two studies included Norwegian data, their results are referred to as 'Norway 1' and 'Norway 2' for clarity. In the meta-analysis of data from Denmark, Sweden and Norway 1, the pooled HR of offspring NDDs was 1.05 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.27; I2=0.0%), and in meta-analysis of data from Denmark, Sweden and Norway 2, it was 1.03 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.24; I2=0.0%).In the meta-analysis including Taiwan, Denmark, Sweden and Norway 1, the pooled HR was 1.06 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.27; I2=0.0%), and when including data from Taiwan, Denmark, Sweden and Norway 2, the pooled HR was 1.04 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.25; I2=0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In this living meta-analysis, we found no evidence that paternal exposure to valproate compared with lamotrigine/levetiracetam during spermatogenesis was associated with increased risk of NDDs in offspring.

Humans↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Meta-analysis].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Meta-Analysis as Topic↗

PubMed1992

Meta-analysis: the fashion of summing-up evidence. Part II: Interpretations and uses.

In this commentary, we use evidence produced by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) ten-year update of a meta-analysis of trials of adjuvant therapies for early breast cancer which started prior to 1985 to illustrate aspects of interpretations and uses of meta-analysis results. The following issues are discussed: i) The meta-analysis provides an average summary for the effect of a treatment. Greater statistical power is obtained by increasing the number of events contributing to the analysis. However, summing up the results of various trials necessitates the loss of individual information concerning the magnitude of treatment effects which depend on tumor- and patient-related factors. Subgroup analyses within the meta-analysis process allow some recovery of such features; ii) The absolute benefit obtained from an effective treatment depends not only on the relative benefit of the treatment but also on the prognosis of the individual patients; iii) The results are more immediately applicable if less reliance is placed on the arithmetic construct inherent in the overview, using instead unconfounded information about the value of treatments actually administered. This avoids the need to extrapolate the effect for one component of the therapy by assuming a lack of interaction with its other components; iv) Although indirect comparisons between different meta-analyses are regularly made to pick the "winner" from among tested treatment modalities, it is unlikely that the optimal therapeutic regimen can be defined via such indirect comparisons, though such comparisons may raise interesting, testable hypotheses.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2025

A comprehensive integration of data on the association of ITPKC polymorphisms with susceptibility to Kawasaki disease: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis of existing research to define clear associations between variations in the ITPKC gene and the risk of developing Kawasaki disease (KD). METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including but not limited to PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and CNKI, up to June 1, 2024, to gather relevant information. This search utilized keywords and MeSH terms related to hyperbilirubinemia and genetic factors. The inclusion criteria encompassed original case-control, longitudinal, or cohort studies. Correlations were analyzed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. RESULTS: Eighteen case-control studies with 5,434 KD cases and 9,419 controls were analyzed. Of these, ten studies assessed 3,129 KD cases and 6,172 controls for the rs28493229 variant, four examined 1,039 cases and 1,688 controls for the rs2290692 variant, two focused on 595 cases and 820 controls for the rs7251246 variant, and two investigated 671 cases and 739 controls for the rs10420685 variant. Results showed a significant association between the rs28493229 polymorphism and increased KD risk across all five genetic models. Subgroup analysis indicated this polymorphism correlates with KD susceptibility in Asians but not in the Chinese population. In contrast, no associations were found between the rs2290692, rs7251246, and rs10420685 polymorphisms and KD risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our pooled data indicate a significant association between the ITPKC rs28493229 polymorphism's minor allele and an increased risk of developing KD, suggesting this variant may enhance susceptibility. Conversely, SNPs rs2290692, rs7251246, and rs10420685 do not demonstrate a statistically significant relationship with KD.

Humans↗

PubMed1985

Efficacy of spinal manipulation/mobilization therapy. A meta-analysis.

A quantitative review (meta-analysis) was undertaken to synthesize existing evidence on the efficacy of joint mobilization and manipulation and expose consumers of rehabilitation research to the methods and procedures of quantitative reviewing. Potentially relevant studies were obtained through a computer-assisted bibliographic search of the Index Medicus data base and through examination of references contained in retrieved studies. A total of 57 titles were potentially relevant to manipulation/mobilization, but only nine met the prespecified criteria for inclusion in the quantitative review. Data analysis indicated that studies not employing random assignment were more likely to produce results supporting the use of manipulation/mobilization therapies. The effects in favor of manipulation and mobilization were greater when manual therapy was provided in conjunction with other forms of treatment and were also greater when the treatment effects were measured immediately following therapy. In addition, hypotheses tests appearing in journals published in the United States showed manipulation/mobilization less effective in comparison with reports appearing in English language journals published outside the United States. The results provided only limited empirical support for spinal mobilization and manipulation when used to treat pain, flexibility limitations, and impairment in physical activity.

Back Pain↗