SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Apoptotic regulators in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): value in prostate cancer detection and prevention.

Early diagnosis of prostate cancer holds tremendous promise for the effective therapy and impact on survival of prostate cancer patients. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is generally accepted as a lesion indicative of a late pathological event in the premalignant changes leading to full development of prostate cancer. This review seeks to identify specific molecular events that may be linked directly to the molecular transition from benign prostate epithelial cells to prostate carcinoma. HGPIN is pathologically detected in a limited group of men undergoing prostate cancer screening for an elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). Loss of apoptotic control provides a molecular basis for the contribution of specific defective steps in the pathway towards development and progression of prostate cancer. Comparative dissection of the apoptosis status and expression profile of key apoptotic regulators among foci of highly proliferative benign prostatic epithelium, PIN and prostate adenocarcinoma from adjacent areas of the same gland revealed a novel insight into the dysfunctional apoptosis events contributing to prostate carcinogenesis. The sequential and notable loss of the three critical signaling components of the apoptotic action of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), in the prostate, that is, the transmembrane receptor II (TbetaRII), the key cell cycle inhibitor p27(Kip1), as well as the protagonist downstream effector of the TGF-beta signaling mechanism, Smad4, points to their potential value to 'faithfully' characterize HGPIN, as a premalignant prostate lesion. Recent evidence on the molecular changes in apoptosis regulators contributing to HGPIN and their role as molecular markers of disease onset, as well as candidates for therapeutic targeting/chemoprevention of prostate cancer in its early stages will be discussed.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1996

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: influence of clinical and pathological data on the detection of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We attempted to characterize patients diagnosed with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia without concurrent cancer on biopsy who had prostate cancer on subsequent biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 93 patients with low and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia without concurrent cancer on initial biopsy were analyzed. The relationships among prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia grades, patient age, digital rectal examination, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), transrectal ultrasound appearance and final pathological results were investigated. RESULTS: Subsequent carcinoma was found on repeat biopsy in 13.3% of patients with low grade and 47.9% with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (p < 0.001). In the former group digital rectal examination, patient age, serum PSA and transrectal ultrasound were not predictive of cancer. Transrectal ultrasound appearance, digital rectal examination and serum PSA were statistically different between high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with and without subsequent cancer (p < 0.001, p = 0.008 and p = 0.016, respectively, univariate analysis). On multivariate analysis of patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia only digital rectal examination and PSA were predictive of subsequent carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a strong predictor of subsequent cancer, especially in men with abnormal digital rectal examination and elevated serum PSA. Patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia should undergo repeat biopsy to exclude cancer. Further investigations are needed to optimize the treatment of patients with low grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and the origins of prostatic carcinoma.

The participants agreed that high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was the most likely precursor of prostate cancer. Consensus was reached regarding grading, suggesting that PIN be classified as low grade and high grade, noting that high grade PIN is the clinically significant end of the morphologic continuum. Grade 1 PIN is now considered low grade, and grades 2 and 3 are considered high grade. All participants agreed that urologists should be informed when high grade PIN is identified in isolation in tissue specimens, but consensus was not reached regarding the value of reporting low grade PIN. No therapy was recommended for patients with high grade PIN, although repeat biopsy and follow-up is of value. No consensus was reached regarding the biologic potential of the lesion known as atypical adenomatous hyperplasia. Further investigation is needed to determine the diagnostic utility of this finding in prostatic specimens.

Forecasting↗

PubMed2003

Cooperation between ectopic FGFR1 and depression of FGFR2 in induction of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in the mouse prostate.

Disruption of the regulatory communication from the stroma to the epithelium mediated by the FGF7/10-FGFR2 signaling axis in the prostate and expression of ectopic FGFR1 in prostatic epithelial cells often correlate with prostate cancer progression both in human and in experimental animals. Ectopic expression of constitutively active FGFR1 mutant (caFGFR1) at low levels in prostate epithelial cells induces low- to intermediate-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) within 6-8 months and high-grade PIN in 20-25 months. Depression of the FGFR2 signaling in the prostate also disturbs homeostasis in the prostate and induces prostate hyperplasia. To study whether PIN lesions induced by the caFGFR1 were expression-level dependent, and whether expression of the caFGFR1 and depression of the FGFR2 signaling in the prostate synergistically disturbed prostate homeostasis, we generated two new strains of ARR2PBi-caFGFR1 transgenic mice, which highly expressed caFGFR1 in prostatic epithelial cells. The mice were crossed with KDNR mice to generate ARR2PBi-caFGFR1/KDNR bigenic mice. The ARR2PBi-caFGFR1 mice developed high-grade PIN within 8 months, which was significantly faster than the mice expressing caFGFR1 at low levels. In addition, depression of the FGFR2 signaling clearly promoted perturbation of cellular homeostasis induced by the caFGFR1. The results demonstrated that the PIN development in caFGFR1 transgenic mice was caFGFR1 dosage-dependent, and indicated that the ectopic FGFR1 and the resident FGFR2 in epithelial cells had opposite impacts on intercompartmental homeostasis in the prostate. The bigenic mice provide a model with cooperative aberrations in the fibroblast growth factor signaling axis for evaluation of tumor-initiating events in prostate tumorigenesis.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

The expression of thrombospondin-1 in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is decreased in prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of thrombospondin (TSP), a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis, in human benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expression of TSP-1, TSP-2 and CD36 receptor was assessed in 73 tissue specimens using immunohistochemistry; specimens were from 32 patients with BPH, seven with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and 34 with cancer. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry showed that all 39 patients with BPH and PIN had TSP-1-positive glands. In contrast, none of the 34 patients with cancer had positive TSP-1 staining in the cancer tissue. All 73 patients were positive for TSP receptor CD36 and negative for TSP-2. CONCLUSIONS: TSP is expressed in BPH, down-regulated in PIN and absent in prostate cancer tissue. This may indicate that TSP is important in prostate cancer progression. Further studies are needed to understand the significance of these findings for the malignant transformation of the prostate gland.

Humans↗

PubMed1997

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in dogs with spontaneous prostate cancer.

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most likely precursor of human prostate cancer. The prevalence and immunophenotype of PIN in dogs with spontaneous prostate cancer has not been previously described. To investigate the association between PIN and prostate cancer, we evaluated the prostates of dogs with spontaneous prostate carcinoma. The prevalence of PIN was determined in formalin-fixed prostates from 29 dogs with spontaneous prostate cancer. Using immunoperoxidase techniques, we compared basal cell layer integrity (high molecular weight keratin 34 beta-E12), proliferative index (MIB-1), and microvessel density (Factor VIII-related antigen) in 14 prostates which contained benign epithelium, PIN, and carcinoma. PIN was present in 19 of 29 (66%) prostates from dogs with spontaneous prostate cancer. The basal cell layer was intact in benign epithelium, disrupted in 72% of acini with PIN, and absent in carcinoma. The mean proliferative index was 17%, 25%, and 40% for benign epithelium, PIN, and carcinoma, respectively, and these differences were significant. The mean microvessel density in foci of PIN and carcinoma (32 and 39 vessels per mm2, respectively) was greater than in benign epithelium (23 vessels per mm2). High-grade PIN is common in the prostates of dogs with spontaneous carcinoma. The basal cell layer is partially disrupted in PIN, whereas it is absent in prostate cancer. The proliferative index and microvessel density of PIN are intermediate between benign epithelium and cancer. These results are similar to those reported for human PIN and prostate cancer, and indicate that PIN is part of a morphologic continuum in the progression of prostate cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first description of high-grade PIN spontaneously occurring in animals. The canine prostate may serve as a useful model for examining factors that modulate PIN and prostate cancer progression.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia occurs spontaneously in the canine prostate.

PURPOSE: Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most likely precursor of human prostate cancer. Although the dog is the only non-human species in which spontaneous prostate cancer occurs frequently, the prevalence of PIN in the canine prostate is unknown. A naturally occurring animal model of PIN has not been described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To determine if high grade PIN occurs spontaneously in the canine prostate, we evaluated totally embedded prostates from 35 outbred dogs that had no clinical evidence of prostatic disease. Prostates from three groups of dogs were analyzed: (1) 11 sexually intact dogs 7-17 years old (elderly sexually intact); (2) 13 sexually intact dogs 1-4 years old (young sexually intact); and (3) 11 dogs 7-17 years old that had been castrated (elderly castrated). The prevalence of PIN was determined by systematic evaluation of hematoxylin/eosin and high molecular weight keratin 34 beta-E12 stained tissue sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded prostates that had been serially sectioned at 4 mm intervals. RESULTS: Canine high grade PIN showed cytologic features identical to the human counterpart, including cell crowding, loss of polarity, and nuclear and nucleolar enlargement. Foci of high grade PIN were present in the prostates of 6 of 11 (55%) elderly, sexually intact dogs but only 1 of 13 (8%) dogs less than 4 years old. Foci of high grade PIN were detected in 1 of 11 (9%) elderly castrated dogs. In elderly, sexually intact dogs with PIN, foci of high grade PIN were present in 13 of 83 (16%) tissue sections evaluated; one of these dogs had focal adenocarcinoma in addition to PIN. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that high grade PIN is frequently present in the prostate of elderly, sexually intact dogs. The prevalence of canine PIN, like human PIN, is apparently influenced by age and testicular androgens. The canine prostate may serve as a useful model to determine the factors that regulate the apparent progression from benign epithelium to PIN and invasive carcinoma.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1999

Clinical evolution of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is most likely a precursor of prostate cancer and is frequently associated with it whereas the direct link between low-grade PIN and cancer is not established. The clinical evolution of isolated high-grade PIN has been the object of much concern because of the possibility of undiagnosed prostate cancer or the evolution of this premalignant lesion in invasive carcinoma. Parameters predictive of the later finding of prostate cancer on repeat biopsy in patients with PIN are of evident interest and we have reviewed our experience and recent data from the literature on this topic as well as on the clinical management of these patients. Low-grade PIN is not by itself a risk of later cancer found on repeat biopsy unless other factors such as PSA increase the cancer suspicion. Patients with low-grade PIN and high serum PSA should therefore undergo repeat biopsies. Patients with low-grade PIN and without additional factors should be followed. Patients with high-grade PIN should systematically be rebiopsied. If a second set is still consistent with PIN, they should undergo additional biopsies again within 3-6 months because they are likely to have an undiagnosed cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1995

Aberrant pattern of lectin binding in low and high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is considered a precursor lesion for peripheral prostatic adenocarcinoma. The biologic significance of low grade PIN is unknown; however, the likelihood of progression from low to high grade PIN has been suggested. METHODS: A battery of nine lectins was applied to paraffin sections from 20 prostatectomies to identify prostatic carcinoma. The patterns of lectin binding were compared among normal/hyperplastic, dysplastic, and malignant glands. The increase in the Ki-67-defined growth fraction was compared with the lectin binding pattern. RESULTS: An aberrant lectin binding pattern, similar to that observed in adenocarcinoma, was observed in PIN for four of the lectins; this distinct staining pattern was found in glands with minimal dysplastic changes and in glands with high grade dysplasia. Specifically, staining for soy bean agglutinin and Ulex europaeus agglutinin was negative in benign and hyperplastic glands and positive in dysplastic glands and carcinoma. Staining for wheat germ agglutinin and peanut agglutinin was weakly positive or negative in normal and hyperplastic glands, whereas it was strongly positive in dysplasia and carcinoma. The staining for Concavalin A, Ricinus communis agglutinin, Dolichos biflorus agglutinin, and Lens culinaris agglutinin showed no difference between normal/hyperplastic and dysplastic glands. The aberrant lectin binding already was evident in low grade dysplasia versus the increased Ki-67 defined-growth fraction that was obvious only in high grade dysplasia and carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the early dysplastic lesions in the prostate may be part of a continuum in the multistep process leading to invasive carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1999

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and endocrine manipulation.

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most common precursor lesion of prostatic adenocarcinoma. In 50- to 70-year-old participants of a randomized screening program for prostate cancer (Rotterdam section of the ERSPC) the frequency of high-grade PIN as an isolated finding in sextant prostatic needle biopsies was estimated to be about 1%. As yet, data in literature on the impact of androgen deprivation on PIN lesions are limited, showing discrepant outcomes. In part this may be the consequence of the application of different criteria for the identification of PIN under conditions of androgen deprivation. Foci of PIN could be distinguished in the majority of radical prostatectomy specimens of men treated for 3 or 6 months with combined endocrine therapy. Endocrine manipulation led to architectural changes (remodelling) in residual PIN which were more pronounced at 6 months of endocrine therapy. This is consistent with a prolonged effect of androgen deprivation on this precursor lesion. The presence of MIB-1 immunopositive nuclei in PIN lesions suggests that they still have the potential to expand after cessation of therapy.

Aged↗

PubMed1992

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): current concepts.

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) represents the putative precancerous end of the morphologic continuum of cellular proliferations within prostatic ducts, ductules and acini. Two grades of PIN are identified (low grade and high grade), and high grade PIN is considered to be a precursor to invasive carcinoma. The continuum which culminates in high grade PIN and early invasive cancer is characterized by basal cell layer disruption, basement membrane disruption, progressive loss of secretory differentiation markers, increasing nuclear and nucleolar abnormalities, increasing proliferative potential, and increasing variation in DNA content (aneuploidy). Clinical studies suggest that PIN predates carcinoma by ten years or more, with low grade PIN first emerging in men in the third decade of life. The clinical importance of recognizing PIN is based on its strong association with carcinoma; its identification in biopsy specimens of the prostate warrants further search for concurrent invasive carcinoma.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Use of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in prostate needle biopsy specimens with isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of prostate adenocarcinoma on follow-up biopsy.

Isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) on needle biopsy confers an increased risk of prostate carcinoma (CaP) on follow-up biopsy. The aim of this study is to determine whether paraffin-section fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of specific chromosome/oncogene copy number abnormalities (CNAs) in biopsy specimens with isolated HGPIN increases the predictive value for CaP on repeat biopsy. Cases were divided into 3 groups: controls (n=8) and sextant biopsy specimens with isolated HGPIN without CaP (group A; n=11) and with CaP (group B; n=14) on follow-up biopsy. Dual-color FISH assessing c-myc, HER-2/neu, chromosome region 7q31 (D7S486), and corresponding chromosome centromeres was performed. An amplification ratio (AR) for each marker centromere was derived for each biopsy specimen, with AR ranges designated as no/low, low-intermediate, and high. Also calculated for each marker were the percentage of cells with marker amplification, hyperdiploidy, and monosomy. A composite score for each biopsy specimen was calculated based on these parameters, with a possible range of 0 to 15. The specific chromosomal oncogene CNAs were as follows: for chromosome 7/7q31, 2 of 11 (18%) in group A and 6 of 14 (43%) in group B; for chromosome 8/c-myc, 4 of 11 (36%) in group A and 9 of 13 (69%) in group B; and for chromosome 17/HER-2/neu, 10 of 10 (100%) in group A and 13 of 14 (93%) in group B. The mean composite score was 0 for controls, 2.5 for group A, and 4.7 for group B. Composite scores > or =4 for the 3 groups were 0 of 9 (0%) for controls, 1 of 11 (12%) for group A, and 8 of 14 (57%) for group B. These differences were statistically significant (P=0.015). One group A patient with a high composite score (6) had atypical small glands on follow-up biopsy at <1 year. Chromosome/oncogene CNAs are uncommon in control patients, occurring with increasing frequency and magnitude in patients with isolated HGPIN without and with follow-up CaP. Chromosome/oncogene CNAs in HGPIN are mostly of the low to intermediate level and display intercellular heterogeneity. HER-2/neu amplification is common in HGPIN with and without follow-up CaP. Chromosome 7 and 8 aneusomy and 7q31 and c-myc amplification are greater in HGPIN with follow-up CaP. Patients with isolated HGPIN and high composite score without follow-up CaP are uncommon; these patients may have a small, unsampled CaP. Although patients with HGPIN without CaP are more likely to have a low composite score, a subset of patients with follow-up CaP have low composite score, suggesting (1) mutational pathways independent of chromosomes 7, 8, and 17 and HER-2/neu, c-myc, and chromosome region 7q31 CNAs; (2) CaP derived from an independent, unsampled focus of HGPIN; or (3) CaP not derived from HGPIN.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2006

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in TURP specimens and subsequent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is considered as a precursor lesion for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Most data supporting this relationship comes from the short-term follow-up of patients with repeated biopsies. We report a study in which patients were followed-up for 11 years to assess the relationships between the presence of high grade PIN, low grade PIN, and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) and the subsequent occurrence of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 601 men treated by TURP in 1990-1993, prostate specimens were reviewed to assess the presence of high grade PIN, low grade PIN, and AAH. Incidental carcinoma was observed in 67 men. Follow-up of the 534 men without incidental prostate cancer was conducted until December 2003 and 24 new prostate cancers were diagnosed. Multivariate regression models were used to assess the relationships between PIN and AAH and prostate cancer on both cross-sectional and prospective data. RESULTS: High grade PIN (odds ratio (OR) = 6.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.28-11.58), low grade PIN (OR = 3.06, 95% CI: 1.45-6.46), and AAH (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.00-4.29) were significantly associated with incidental prostate cancer. In the prospective study, only high grade PIN was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of prostate cancer: hazard ratio = 3.12, 95% CI: 1.15-8.49. CONCLUSION: Although high grade PIN, low grade PIN, and AAH were all associated with incidental prostate cancer, the long-term prospective study showed that only high grade PIN was a significant determinant of the subsequent occurrence of prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1996

Diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in whole mount sections of prostates.

Dysplasia of prostate or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is associated with prostatic adenocarcinoma, which is quite common in elderly males. The presence of high grade PIN in biopsy of patients with clinically suspicious tumors is an indication of further search for malignancy. Whole mount sections of 48 prostates were studied. PIN was sought and graded. The morphology of other lesions including atrophy, adenosis and basal cell hyperplasia, and also seminal vesicle epithelium was studied. All 36 prostates resected for treatment of prostatic adenocarcinoma contained foci of PIN. The differential diagnosis of PIN, atrophy, adenosis, basal cell hyperplasia and seminal vesicle epithelium is quite easy when whole mount sections are studied. Whole mount sections of prostates are valuable teaching material for pathologists.

Aged↗

PubMed1993

Architectural patterns of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is characterized by cellular proliferations within pre-existing ducts and glands with cytologic changes mimicking adenocarcinoma, including prominent nucleoli, but lacking stromal invasion. To determine the architectural spectrum of high-grade PIN, 60 serially sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens with PIN and cancer were reviewed. Four common patterns of high-grade PIN were identified, usually with multiple patterns in each case: tufting (in 87% of cases), micropapillary (in 85% of cases), cribriform (in 32% of cases), and flat (in 28% of cases). Tumor grade was not significantly associated with any pattern of PIN. Luminal cytoplasmic apical blebs were found in all cases regardless of the pattern of PIN. A variety of associated architectural and cytologic features were observed with high-grade PIN: epithelial arches (in 60% of cases), cellular trabecular epithelial bars (in 22% of cases), "Roman" bridges (in 30% of cases), partial gland involvement (in 82% of cases), basal cell layer disruption with glandular budding (in 23% of cases), large cystic gland involvement (in 10% of cases), involvement by nodular hyperplasia (in 5% of cases), microcalcifications (in 8% of cases), proteinaceous luminal secretions (in 62% of cases), corpora amylacea (in 55% of cases), exfoliated cells of PIN (in 42% of cases), luminal crystalloids (in 3% of cases), and mucinous metaplasia (in 2% of cases). High-grade PIN exhibits a variety of architectural patterns while retaining the distinctive cytoplasmic apical blebs and diagnostic nuclear and nucleolar features. Identification of high-grade PIN warrants a further search for invasive carcinoma, but should not influence or dictate decisions regarding definitive therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1999

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and apoptosis in benign prostatic hyperplasia before and after the Chernobyl accident in Ukraine.

The prevalence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in men who underwent surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) before and after the Chernobyl nuclear accident was studied. BPH samples were obtained by adenomectomy from 45 patients operated in 1984 before the accident (Group I), and 47 patients from the low contaminated Kiev City (Group II) and 76 from high contaminated area (Group III) operated between 1996 and 1998. Their BPH samples were examined histologically and immunohistochemically. The incidences of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and high grade PIN (HGPIN) were 15.5 and 11.1% in Group I, 29.8 and 14.9% in Grpoup II, and 35. 5 and 19.7% in Group III. The difference between the incidences of PIN in Group I and III is significant (p<0.02). There was increased apoptosis in areas of PIN in Group II and III as compared to Group I (p<0.001). Since apoptosis has been shown to be associated with ionizing radiation and it is now found to be associated with PIN in patients diagnosed after the Chernobyl nuclear accident, this suggests that long-term low dose internal ionizing radiation potentially may cause prostate cancer.

Apoptosis↗

PubMed1996

Do prostate specific antigen and prostate specific antigen density enhance the detection of prostate carcinoma after initial diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia without concurrent carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is considered to be a precursor of prostate carcinoma in which serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) have been correlated with PIN grades. The aim of this study was to determine whether PSA and prostate specific antigen density (PSAD), obtained at the time of initial diagnosis of PIN without concurrent carcinoma, can be used as predictive factors to discriminate patients with subsequent cancer on repeat biopsy. METHODS: We studied, retrospectively, the records of 93 patients with PIN (low and high grade) without concurrent carcinoma at the time of their first needle biopsy. We assessed the relationship between initial PIN grade, PSA, and PSAD with later detection of carcinoma on repeat biopsy. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups for analysis according to their initial PSA level (0-4, 4.1-10, >10 ng/mL). RESULTS: Carcinoma detection rate on repeat biopsy was 13.3% for patients with low grade PIN and 47.7% for patients with high grade PIN (P < 0.006). High grade PIN was frequently associated with subsequent carcinoma whatever the PSA level (33.3-61.9%). Low grade PIN was associated with subsequent carcinoma in 42.8% of the cases when PSA was greater than 10 ng/mL. When PSA was between 4 and 10 ng/mL, low grade PIN carcinoma was found on repeat biopsies in only 10.7% of the cases (P = 0.05). In none of the PSA subgroups did PSAD enhance later cancer detection. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with high grade PIN, the incidence of subsequent carcinoma is high, whatever the PSA values. For these cases repeat biopsies should be recommended. Patients with low grade PIN and PSA greater than 10 ng/mL should have repeat biopsies because the incidence of subsequent carcinoma is high and comparable to high grade PIN. PSAD did not provide additional information.

Biopsy, Needle↗

PubMed2000

Expression of pi-class glutathione S-transferase: two populations of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with different relations to carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia of the transition zone appear to be at increased risk of developing prostatic carcinoma, although not to the same degree as patients with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia of the peripheral/central zone. Previous investigations have shown loss of expression of pi-class glutathione S-transferase (GST-pi; an enzyme that protects against electrophilic carcinogens) in prostatic carcinoma and in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. The aim of this study was to compare the expression of GST-pi in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia of the transition zone with that in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia of the peripheral/central zone (that is, non-transition zone). METHODS: Immunostaining with the anti-GST-pi antibody was performed on 20 high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia samples of the transition zone, either isolated or associated with prostatic carcinoma (groups 1 and 2, respectively; 10 cases each) and on 20 high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia samples of the non-transition zone, either isolated or associated with prostatic carcinoma (groups 3 and 4, respectively; 10 cases each). This study also included six samples of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia simultaneously present in the transition and non-transition zones and not associated with prostatic carcinoma (group 5). The presence of immunostaining, staining intensity, and the distribution of immunostaining were evaluated in the high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesions and in the normal tissue and cancer areas. RESULTS: The GST-pi antibody stained the cytoplasm of the cells lining the ducts and acini of normal prostate tissue. Staining was stronger and more diffuse in the basal cell layer than in the luminal (or secretory) cell layer. Immunohistochemical staining with anti-GST-pi antibodies failed to detect the enzyme in all prostatic carcinoma foci but one. Two patterns were detected in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. One was represented by GST-pi staining similar to that of the normal tissue (pattern A). The other deviated from it and was characterised by absence of GST-pi expression in the secretory cells and abundant expression in scattered basal cells (pattern B). Pattern A staining was seen more frequently in the transition than in the non-transition zone. Pattern B staining was seen mainly in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia of non-transition zone associated with cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The differential expression of GST-pi in the transition and non-transition zones indicates the existence of two populations with the morphological appearance of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia that might have different associations with carcinoma.

Aged↗