PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

Spironolactone and altizide used in combination with enalapril: twenty-four-hour ambulatory recording of blood pressure.

The addition of enalapril or acebutolol to a regimen of altizide + spironolactone in patients with moderate hypotension was investigated in a multicenter study of 53 patients. The patients underwent semiambulatory 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, especially to observe hypotensive episodes. In the 25 patients uncontrolled with altizide + spironolactone alone, enalapril and acebutolol were about equally effective in reducing blood pressure. The incidence of hypotension was low and comparable for both treatment groups, provided that the initial dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor was low (5 mg).

Acebutolol↗

Efficacy and safety of loratadine (10 mg once daily), terfenadine (60 mg twice daily), and placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

A total of 317 patients received loratadine, 10 mg once daily, terfenadine 60 mg twice daily, or placebo in a 14-day, double-blind, randomized study in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Four nasal and four nonnasal symptoms were evaluated. At the end point evaluation, mean total scores of combined nasal and nonnasal symptoms decreased from baseline (improved) 46%, 44%, and 35%, respectively, for loratadine, terfenadine, and placebo. The difference between loratadine and placebo treatment was significant (p = 0.03). Loratadine was particularly effective compared with placebo in relieving nasal discharge, sneezing, and itching/burning eyes. Therapeutic response to treatment was good or excellent in 66 (64%) of 103 loratadine-treated patients, 58 (56%) of 104 terfenadine-treated patients, and 48 (47%) of 102 placebo-treated patients. Adverse experiences reported during the study were usually mild or moderate and were not significantly different among the three treatment groups. Sedation (somnolence) was reported by 10 loratadine-treated patients, seven terfenadine-treated patients, and eight placebo-treated patients. Loratadine, 10 mg once daily, was comparable to terfenadine, 60 mg twice daily, and significantly superior to placebo in the symptomatic relief of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Adolescent↗

Multicentre, double-blind comparison of terfenadine and cetirizine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

This double-blind, multicentre study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of terfenadine 120 mg with cetirizine 10 mg, each taken once daily, in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Two hundred and eighty-five patients were recruited to the study by nine general practice centres in the south of England during the 1989 hay-fever season. Symptom severity was assessed daily by the patient and before and after the one-week treatment period by the investigator. At the second clinic visit both patient and investigator assessed the overall response to treatment. The two treatment groups were well matched for all demographic variables and baseline symptom scores. Improvement in all seven symptoms (nasal congestion, sneezing, rhinorrhoea, itching nose, itching eyes, watery eyes and red eyes) and overall response to treatment were similar in both treatment groups. Adverse events were mainly of mild to moderate severity and were reported by 14 patients on terfenadine and 21 patients treated with cetirizine (p = 0.317). This study confirmed terfenadine's role as the treatment of choice in hayfever. A single 120 mg dose in the morning effectively reduced symptoms by 43 to 70 per cent of baseline values, with an acceptably low incidence of side effects. Cetirizine at a single dose of 10 mg displayed equal efficacy in controlling hayfever symptoms but, in common with other studies, had a significantly greater incidence of drowsiness (p = 0.046).

Adult↗

Gabapentin in partial epilepsy. UK Gabapentin Study Group.

Gabapentin is an analogue of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) which has anticonvulsant properties in animals. In a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 1200 mg/day gabapentin as additional therapy in 127 patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy, 25% of patients who received gabapentin had the number of partial seizures at least halved, compared with 9.8% of patients given placebo. The median reduction in partial seizure frequency during 12 weeks' treatment was 29.2% with gabapentin compared with 12.5% with placebo. The mean adjusted response ratio for gabapentin (-0.192) was significantly better than the ratio of -0.060 for placebo by analysis of variance. 62% of patients who received gabapentin reported mostly mild or moderate adverse effects compared with 41% on placebo; no interactions were observed between gabapentin and other standard anticonvulsants. Gabapentin is an effective additional treatment for patients with partial epilepsy refractory to standard therapy, is fairly well tolerated, and appears to have a favourable efficacy-to-toxicity ratio.

Acetates↗

[Treatment using immucytal in children with recurrent respiratory infections: an Italian multicenter experience].

120 children, 71 male and 49 female, aged between 2 years and 15 years (mean 6.15 +/- 3.52 years) with recurrent respiratory infections, were treated with Immucytal, an immunomodulator of bacterial origin, based on membrane proteoglycan fractions plus bacterial ribosomes. The children, selected on the basis of the previous year's clinical score, were treated according to a random design with either Immucytal or placebo, using the same dosage of one puff per nostril plus one puff in the oropharyngeal cavity three times a day, as follows: 1st month: two weeks' treatment, one week wash out, one week's treatment. 2nd, 3rd, 4th months: two weeks' treatment, two week's wash out. Monthly throughout the treatment period the frequency and severity of airway infections episodes were assessed using the same score as for admission. Blood chemistry test, immunological assays (circulating Ig, lymphocyte subpopulations, Merieux Multitest in vivo blastization test) and respiratory tests (spirometry using a pneumotachigraph) were done before and after the treatment. 118/120 children completed treatment; the two dropouts were in the placebo group, one for compliance and the other because of headaches. Respiratory symptoms improved significantly in the actively treated children already from the first month, but not in the placebo group. This improvement consisted of reduction of the respiratory infectious episodes in both the upper and lower airways. No changes were noted in respiratory function parameters. From the immunological viewpoint, there were significant rises in serum IgA and IgM and enhanced skin response tot he Multitest; there was no change in the percentages of different circulating lymphocyte subpopulations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

Initiation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV infection: a review of interstudy consistencies.

A number of clinical trials have explored the optimal dosage for antiretroviral therapy and, in various ways, the optimal time, in terms of stage of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, at which treatment should begin. Some studies have shown that treatment with zidovudine results in a delay in progression to more advanced stages of HIV disease, and that the benefits are more durable among persons who started zidovudine with higher CD4+ cell counts. Efficacy is preserved and toxicity is reduced when zidovudine is used at dosages lower than those originally recommended. The Concorde study found that administration of zidovudine to asymptomatic persons was associated with increases in CD4+ cell counts and improvement in delaying disease progression at 55 weeks, but found no correlation between time of initiation of therapy and either longer-term delay in onset of symptomatic disease or ultimate survival. The analysis of these results, however, is complicated because of premature crossover of study participants from deferred treatment to immediate treatment. The consensus of the discussants of these studies is that antiretroviral treatment should be initiated by the time the CD4+ cell count has fallen to 200-500 cells/mm3. Although recognizing that, in general, viral infections call for treatment, the panelists were divided in their opinions about treatment of asymptomatic patients with CD4+ cell counts > 500/mm3.

Cohort Studies↗

Meta-analysis of clinical trials: a consumer's guide.

Meta-analysis is a popular statistical tool allowing the synthesis of related research studies in a quantitative manner. Components of a good meta-analysis are first discussed, with a view toward critical reading of reports of meta-analyses. Examples include lipid-lowering drugs and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A role for meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials was examined at a workshop held at the National Institutes of Health and aspects of these uses of meta-analyses are considered. Basic analytical and graphical methods of meta-analysis are briefly reviewed. The goal is to encourage more thoughtful evaluation of the many meta-analyses that are published or are presented.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Clinical trials of extended spectrum penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitors in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections. European and North American experience.

The clinical results with the beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor class of antimicrobials in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections are reviewed. The three agents now in clinical use--ampicillin/sulbactam, ticarcillin/clavulanate, and piperacillin/tazobactam--are effective against a broad variety of gram-positive and gram-negative organisms. The beta-lactamase inhibitor is an irreversible inactivator of beta-lactamase enzymes, which are produced by many gram-negative and gram-positive organisms. Randomized, prospective, clinical trials of each agent indicate clinical cure rates > 85% that are not significantly different from those obtained with second-generation cephalosporin or aminoglycoside plus antianaerobic comparators, with the exception of one study. Piperacillin/tazobactam has also been compared with imipenem, with equivalent or superior outcomes, depending on the dose of the imipenem comparator. Side effects in the non-penicillin-allergic patient are few. The incidence of abnormal renal function tests are generally lower than that obtained with aminoglycoside plus antianaerobic therapy. Introduction of this new beta-lactam antimicrobial group provides another important strategy for the adjunctive management of surgically treated, community-acquired, intra-abdominal infection.

Abdomen↗