PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Systematic Reviews as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Search and selection methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics (2000-2004).

INTRODUCTION: More systematic reviews related to orthodontic topics are published each year, although little has been done to evaluate their search and selection methodologies. METHODS: Systematic reviews related to orthodontics published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2004, were searched for their use of multiple electronic databases and secondary searches. The search and selection methods of identified systematic reviews were evaluated against the Cochrane Handbook's guidelines. RESULTS: Sixteen orthodontic systematic reviews were identified in this period. The percentage of reviews documenting and using each criterion of article searching has changed over the last 5 years, with no recognizable directional trend. On average, most systematic reviews documented their electronic search terms (88%) and inclusion-exclusion criteria (100%), and used secondary searching (75%). Many still failed to search more than MEDLINE (56%), failed to document the database names and search dates (37%), failed to document the search strategy (62%), did not use several reviewers for selecting studies (75%), and did not include all languages (81%). CONCLUSIONS: The methodology of systematic reviews in orthodontics is still limited, with key methodological components frequently absent or not appropriately described.

Databases, Bibliographic↗
PubMed2026

A Bibliometric Analysis of Systematic Reviews in the Field of Ankylosing Spondylitis from 2007 to 2025.

BACKGROUND: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease and the most common clinical form of spinal arthritis. Over the past decades, tremendous progress has been made in systematic reviews on AS. This study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of AS-related meta-analyses to visualize the hotspots and trends in the field. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted for publications of AS meta-analysis from 2007 to 2025 using the Web of Science Core Collection database. Bibliometric analysis was performed using the Bibliometrix software package, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. RESULTS: In total, 1073 articles were identified, and the number of relevant publications showed annual growth. China, the USA, and England were the most productive countries. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases was the most productive journal (54, 10.65%), Pan Faming was the most productive author (23, 4.54%), and Anhui Medical University (45, 8.88%) was the most productive institution. High-frequency keywords were mainly grouped into five themes: complications, biologics, physical therapy exercises, gut microbiota, and analytical methods. DISCUSSION: This first bibliometric analysis of AS-related EBM research showed a 20-year upward trend in AS meta-analyses, consistent with prior studies. CiteSpace revealed that China (top since 2014) and the USA led in publications (53 countries) but had limited collaboration. Pan Faming (23 articles) was the most active author, and Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases published the most articles. Keyword analysis identified five themes (e.g., AS complications, biologics) and research frontiers: pre-2012 genome-AS links, post-2012 multi-center RCTs, and the recent focus on AS patients' HRQoL. Limitations included database and English-language bias; future meta-analyses should adopt standardized outcomes. CONCLUSION: In recent years, there has been a remarkable surge in the number of meta-analyses on AS. This significant increase underscores the importance of this research area. Studies in this field have mainly focused on several key aspects: risk factors, network meta-analysis, and quality- of-life studies. These findings are highly valuable for understanding advancements in ASrelated research and can also encourage researchers and clinicians to focus on both effective medical treatments and the well-being of AS patients.

Spondylitis, Ankylosing↗
PubMed2003

Do U.S. Environmental Protection Agency water quality guidelines for recreational waters prevent gastrointestinal illness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Despite numerous studies, uncertainty remains about how water quality indicators can best be used in the regulation of recreational water. We conducted a systematic review of this topic with the goal of quantifying the association between microbial indicators of recreational water quality and gastrointestinal (GI) illness. A secondary goal was to evaluate the potential for GI illness below current guidelines. We screened 976 potentially relevant studies and from these identified 27 studies. From the latter, we determined summary relative risks for GI illness in relation to water quality indicator density. Our results support the use of enterococci in marine water at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guideline levels. In fresh water, (Italic)Escherichia(/Italic) coli was a more consistent predictor of GI illness than are enterococci and other bacterial indicators. A log (base 10) unit increase in enterococci was associated with a 1.34 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.00-1.75] increase in relative risk in marine waters, and a log (base 10) unit increase in E. coli was associated with a 2.12 (95% CI, 0.925-4.85) increase in relative risk in fresh water. Indicators of viral contamination were strong predictors of GI illness in both fresh and marine environments. Significant heterogeneity was noted among the studies. In our analysis of heterogeneity, studies that used a nonswimming control group, studies that focused on children, and studies of athletic or other recreational events found elevated relative risks. Future studies should focus on the ability of new, more rapid and specific microbial methods to predict health effects, and estimating the risks of recreational water exposure among susceptible persons.

Diarrhea↗
PubMed2003

Considering resistance in systematic reviews of antibiotic treatment.

CONTEXT: Microorganisms resistant to antibiotic drugs are a threat to the health and chances of survival of patients. Systematic reviews on antibiotic drugs that ignore the topic of resistance present readers with a skewed view, emphasizing short-term efficacy or effectiveness while ignoring long-term consequences. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether systematic reviews of antibiotic treatment consider resistance; if not, to find out whether data on resistance were reported in the original trials; and based on that, to offer a framework for taking resistance into account in systematic reviews. DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (the Cochrane Library, 2001, issue 2); and MEDLINE, 1996-2000. STUDY SELECTION: (i) Systematic reviews or meta-analyses of antimicrobial therapy, published during 1996-2000. (ii) Randomized, controlled trials abstracted in systematic reviews that addressed a topic highly relevant to antibiotic resistance. DATA EXTRACTION: We examined each systematic review, and each article, to see whether the implications of resistance were discussed; and whether data on resistance were collected. RESULTS: Out of 111 systematic reviews, only 44 (40%) discussed resistance. Ten reviews (9%) planned or performed collection of data on the response of patients with susceptible or resistant isolates. In 22 systematic reviews (20%), collection of data on induction of resistance was planned or performed. The topic of 41 reviews was judged highly relevant to resistance, and these reviews extracted data from 337 articles, out of which we retrieved 279 articles (83%). In 201 (72%) articles, resistance was discussed or data pertaining to it were collected. Ninety-seven articles (35%) gave actual data on resistance of pathogens to the study drugs, 71 articles (25%) data on efficacy of antibiotic drugs in patients with susceptible and resistant pathogens, and 55 articles (20%) provided data on infection or colonization with resistant strains during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Most systematic reviews on antibiotic treatment ignored the issue of resistance, although many of the original articles referred to it and some reported relevant data. Reviewers should collect data on resistance and discuss the implications in their discussion and sections concerned with policy implications.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2001

Methylprednisolone and acute spinal cord injury: an update of the randomized evidence.

OBJECTIVES: Randomized trials are widely recognized as providing the most reliable evidence for assessing efficacy and safety of therapeutic interventions. This evidence base is used to evaluate the current status of methylprednisolone (MPSS) in the early treatment of acute spinal cord injury. METHODS: Medline, CINAHL, and other specified databases were searched for MeSH headings "methylprednisolone and acute spinal cord injury." The Cochrane Library and an existing systematic review on the topic were also searched. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were identified that evaluated high-dose MPSS for acute spinal cord injury. Three trials by the NASCIS group were of high methodologic quality, and a Japanese and French trial of moderate to low, methodologic quality. Meta-analysis of the final result of three trials comparing 24-hour high-dose MPSS with placebo or no therapy indicates an average unilateral 4.1 motor function score improvement (95% confidence interval 0.6-7.6, P = 0.02) in patients treated with MPSS. This neurologic recovery is likely to be correlated with improved functional recovery in some patients. The safety of this regimen of MPSS is evident from the spinal cord injury trials and a systematic review of 51 surgical trials of high-dose MPSS. CONCLUSION: High-dose MPSS given within 8 hours of acute spinal cord injury is a safe and modestly effective therapy that may result in important clinical recovery for some patients. Further trials are needed to identify superior pharmacologic therapies and to test drugs that may sequentially influence the postinjury cascade.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Skin care in the well term newborn: two systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Awareness is increasing that the use of some commercial products on the premature neonatal skin may be beneficial, whereas the use of others may be harmful. The World Health Organization developed general postnatal care guidelines and the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses published specific evidence-based guidance relating to neonatal skin care. No systematic reviews on the topic have focused on the term newborn. The objective of this review was to determine, for the well term baby, if the use of soaps or detergents in bath water is associated with the development of dry, cracked, or flaking skin in the perinatal period, and short- and long-term consequences of the use of emollients, lotions, or moisturizers for dry skin. METHODS: We conducted a structured systematic review of prospective studies involving term newborns. RESULTS: No relevant studies were located. CONCLUSIONS: No prospective studies of research in skin care involving the term newborn were found. Some recommendations for skin care may balance risk and benefit for the compromised infant, but this balance may be different for the healthy term newborn. Clinical practitioners should be aware that outcomes related to the use of soaps, detergents, emollients, and lotions on the term neonatal skin have not been formally investigated. Systematic reviews that yield no formal results provide insights into unresearched areas of practice, and should be reported to highlight these deficits, and to avoid duplication of effort by future investigators.

Baths↗
PubMed1999

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: a structured review of the methodological literature.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review methods for systematic review/meta-analysis in order to identify the different methodological and statistical methods that have been proposed. A summary of the main findings is presented here, with emphasis given to health services research topics. METHODS: A thorough systematic search for methodological papers was carried out using a variety of methods, including the use of electronic databases. Approximately 1000 potentially relevant references were identified, a number of them from education, psychology and sociology. RESULTS: After briefly reviewing the procedural methods required to carry out a review, and the basic statistical methods used to combine study estimates, less established methods are discussed. These include methods for dealing with publication bias, meta-regression, meta-analysis of individual patient data, the synthesis of non-randomized evidence alone and in combination with randomized studies. Bayesian modelling and economic evaluation through meta-analysis. Recommendations for meta-analytical practice are given; these are either distilled from previous guidelines, or constructed where there appears to be a broad consensus across the literature. CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that this review will provide a consistent and comprehensive, but concise, description of the methods available for synthesizing evidence, that it will promote better quality reviews of the results of health services research and identify specific areas which require methodological development.

Bayes Theorem↗
PubMed2006

Working conditions and health among employees at information technology--enabled services: a review of current evidence.

Workers in information technology (IT)-enabled services like business process outsourcing and call centers working with visual display units are reported to have various health and psycho-social disorders. Evidence from previously published studies in peer- reviewed journals and internet sources were examined to explore health disorders and psycho-social problems among personnel employed in IT-based services, for a systematic review on the topic. In addition, authors executed a questionnaire- based pilot study. The available literature and the pilot study, both suggest health disorders and psychosocial problems among workers of business process outsourcing. The details are discussed in the review.

Computer Terminals↗
PubMed2002

How to undertake a clinically relevant systematic review in a rapidly evolving field. Magnetic resonance angiography.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to determine which generations of the evolving technology of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) are currently of clinical relevance in two clinical applications. Our purpose was to plan a systematic review that would be valuable both to purchasers driven by cost-effectiveness and to practicing clinicians. METHODS: Information was gathered from a search of major bibliographic databases, from a short questionnaire sent to 500 U.K. vascular radiologists and vascular surgeons, and from local clinical experts. We asked which of the MRA techniques were currently used and, assuming availability, what would be their technique of choice. RESULTS: There were 206 published articles that satisfied preliminary inclusion criteria: 69 discussed 2D time of flight (TOF); 47, 3D TOF; and 38, contrast-enhanced techniques. There were 162 questionnaires returned (60 radiologists, 102 surgeons). Of the total respondents, 77/162 (48%) used MRA in the assessment of carotid artery stenosis; 47/77 (61%) used 2D TOF; 32/77 (42%), 3D TOF; and 26/77 (34%), contrast-enhanced techniques. Thirty-five of 162 (22%) respondents used MRA in the assessment of peripheral vascular disease (PVD); 15/35 (43%) used 2D TOF, 4/35 (11%) used 3D TOF, and 22/35 (63%) used contrast-enhanced techniques. For those wishing to use MRA, contrast-enhanced techniques were the method of choice. CONCLUSIONS: The TOF methods that represent earlier generations of the technology remain clinically relevant, and will therefore be included in our systematic review. To ensure complete and relevant coverage in reviews of other evolving technologies, it would be advisable to obtain data for guidance in a similar way.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The application of artificial intelligence in healthcare practice: A mapping review of systematic reviews.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare practice, with growing evidence supporting its use in diagnosis, prognosis, treatment planning, and operational decision-making. The proliferation of systematic reviews in recent years underscores the need for an updated synthesis of the literature to inform research, policy, and practice. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and CINAHL for systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between 2019 and February 2026. Eligible reviews focused on AI applications in healthcare practice, were peer-reviewed, and written in English. A total of 368 reviews met the inclusion criteria. Publication volume increased steadily, peaking in 2025. AI research was concentrated in high-density domains, such as radiology, oncology, and critical care. Across reviews, diagnostic imaging, electronic health record (EHR) data, and biomarkers/laboratory results accounted for 68% of training data sources, though newer data types, such as wearable device and sensor data, emerged from 2022 onward. Diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment comprised over 80% of AI applications, with novel uses emerging in recent years, such as AI-assisted clinical documentation (e.g., ambient documentation tools) and patient education. Ethical concerns were reported in 78.5% of reviews, with privacy, model accuracy, data and algorithmic bias, and explainability as recurrent themes. The proportion of reviews reporting ethical concerns increased from 2021 to 2025. AI applications in healthcare are expanding in scope, diversifying in data sources, and evolving toward novel clinical and operational uses. The human-centered AI or augmented intelligence paradigm, integrating computational precision with clinical expertise, holds significant promise but will require parallel advances in governance, regulatory frameworks, and ethical oversight to ensure safe adoption.

Artificial Intelligence↗
PubMed2026

The role of adjunctive aqueous suppressants for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: A systematic review.

Our goal is to determine whether adjunctive aqueous suppressants (topical β-blockers, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, or oral acetazolamide) enhance outcomes of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), focusing on retinal thickness, visual acuity, injection burden, intraocular pressure (IOP), and safety. DME, RVO, and nAMD are leading causes of vision loss treated with repeated intravitreal injections, yet many eyes show persistent fluid. Aqueous suppressants are inexpensive and widely available, with potential to prolong intravitreal drug residence and improve outcomes, but their clinical value remains uncertain. Following a registered protocol, we searched 4 databases (January, 2000 toMay, 2025) for randomized and comparative studies evaluating adjunct aqueous suppressants with anti-VEGF therapy. Primary outcome was change in retinal thickness; secondary outcomes included visual acuity, injection burden, IOP, and adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed and findings synthesized narratively. Twelve studies (7 randomized trials; 495 eyes) met inclusion criteria. In DME, 3 of 4 trials showed greater thickness reduction with adjunctive dorzolamide (±timolol), although visual gains were inconsistent. In RVO, 1 trial suggested transient anatomical benefit, whereas oral acetazolamide showed no added effect. In nAMD, adjunctive dorzolamide-timolol reduced residual fluid in refractory cases without visual or treatment-sparing benefit. Topical therapy produced modest IOP reductions without serious adverse events. Adjunct aqueous suppressants may provide limited short-term anatomical benefit, particularly in DME and refractory nAMD, but consistent functional or durability effects are not found in this study. Larger, longer-term randomized studies are needed.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Of mites and men: reference bias in narrative review articles: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Citations in scientific articles may tend to favor the views presented. We studied whether there is such reference bias in narrative review articles that discuss interventions against house dust mites for people with asthma. DESIGN: Systematic review of reviews identified in a Medline search that expressed an opinion about the clinical effects of physical or chemical intervention methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Positive bias was judged to have occurred if the reference list contained a higher proportion of trial references with significant results than among all trials available to the authors (published 2 years or more prior to the review). RESULTS: Seventy reviews were included, of which 63 (90%) recommended physical interventions. Forty-six reviews had trial references, 4 of these only to chemical interventions. In the remaining 42 reviews, reference bias was detected (P=2 x 10-8). The most quoted trial had only 7 patients per group, its claimed significant result was probably erroneous, and it did not report a clinical outcome. Intervention recommendations were often based on nonrandomized evidence, and the most quoted nonrandomized controlled study had included only 10 patients per group but claimed very positive results. CONCLUSION: The narrative review articles were severely biased, and their positive intervention recommendations are at variance with the systematic Cochrane Review on this topic and a recent very large trial of physical intervention, both of which failed to find an effect.

Asthma↗
PubMed2005

Survey of eye practitioners' attitudes towards diagnostic tests and therapies for dry eye disease.

BACKGROUND: There is a wide variation in the use of diagnostic tests for dry eye disease. The purpose of this study was to survey the attitudes of eye practitioners towards both tests and therapies available for dry eye disease. METHOD: An anonymous, web-based questionnaire was used, containing both quantitative and qualitative sections. RESULTS: Thirty-eight respondents, evenly distributed in experience, confirmed the wide variation of diagnostic tests in use. History and staining techniques were significantly preferred to tests of tear flow (P < 0.05). 'Evidence' was the most valued test characteristic, and was regarded as significantly more important than 'comfort' or 'cost' (P < 0.003). However, 'evidence' was not valued significantly higher than 'ease of use' or 'time taken to perform'. Overall, there was poor satisfaction with diagnostic and therapeutic options in dry eye, for both quantitative and qualitative measures. CONCLUSION: This is the first qualitative study of attitudes towards dry eye disease. Attitudes towards the adequacy of diagnostic tests vary considerably. As evidence supporting a diagnostic test's validity is the most highly valued test characteristic, a systematic review of the topic is justified.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2003

The use of the evidence-based approach in a periodontal therapy contemporary science workshop.

BACKGROUND: When appropriately evaluated and carefully managed, the integration of emerging technology into practice can improve health and enhance the quality of life. Since the last American Academy of Periodontology Workshop in 1996, great technological advances in the areas of data access, retrieval, and management have been made. The World Wide Web has "exploded" with great possibilities for gathering data from many sources. Evaluation methods such as meta-analysis and modeling have likewise improved, permitting a more objective and useful assessment of the retrieved information. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how the evidence-based (EB) approach was used to plan and implement a consensus conference on periodontal therapy, the Workshop on Contemporary Science in Clinical Periodontics. RATIONALE: The methodologies and philosophies associated with the EB approach provided the ideal framework for assessing the applicability of the newest clinical research to patient therapy. METHODS: Evidence-based systematic reviews on 15 topics associated with contemporary clinical periodontal practice were conducted prior to the Workshop. High standards of scientific rigor and scholarly ideals were stressed throughout the process. At the highly structured conference the reviews served as the basis for development of consensus reports that include implications for practice and research. MATERIAL COVERED: 1. The rationale, design, and implementation of a conference on contemporary clinical periodontics using an evidence-based approach. 2. Data management, clinical versus statistical significance, and the challenges of technology transfer and dissemination. 3. The benefits and limitations of using the EB approach in a consensus conference. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus statements resulting from the conference should serve to augment clinical decision-making, research priorities, education, and reimbursement. The evidence-based approach removed much of the subjectivity traditionally associated with classical reviews of the literature and allowed participants to focus on substantive issues.

Consensus Statements as Topic↗
PubMed2004

Screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse: recommendation statement.

This statement summarizes the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations on behavioral counseling interventions to reduce alcohol misuse in primary care patients and updates the 1996 recommendations on this topic. The complete information on which this statement is based, including evidence tables and references, is available in the accompanying article in this issue and in the systematic evidence review on this topic. The complete USPSTF recommendation statement (which includes a brief review of the supporting evidence), the accompanying journal article, and the complete systematic evidence review are available through the USPSTF Web site (http://www.preventiveservices.ahrq.gov). The journal article and the USPSTF recommendation statement are available in print through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publications Clearinghouse (telephone, 800-358-9295; e-mail, ahrqpubs@ahrq.gov).

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Publication bias affected the estimate of postoperative nausea in an acupoint stimulation systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of publication bias and country effect on the results and conclusion of a systematic review of wrist P6 acupoint stimulation for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. METHODS: Reanalysis of a systematic review of 26 randomized trials comparing P6 acupoint stimulation with sham published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using the Copas' sensitivity approach. RESULTS: If it is assumed that all studies that have ever been carried out are included, or that those selected for review are truly representative of all such studies, then the estimated relative risk (RR) for nausea was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.58 to 0.88, P<.01) and for vomiting was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.56 to 0.88, P<.01) after adjusting for country effect. For nausea, adjustment for publication bias suggests that the risk has been overestimated. If around 33% of studies have been unpublished, the RR of nausea (0.92, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.06, P=.25) is no longer significant. For vomiting, however, there is no strong evidence of publication bias. The number of unpublished studies required to substantially overturn the above significant result is implausibly large. CONCLUSION: Publication bias affects the published estimate of postoperative nausea, not vomiting.

Humans↗