SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Targeting chromatin regulators”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMed1980

[Molecular mechanisms of steroid hormone action (author's transl)].

The present survey is an attempt to present a unifying model for the mechanism of action of steroid hormones. Out of an overwhelming body of experimental observations with various cell and hormone systems a few representative examples are presented. The following sequence of events is outlined: a) penetration of the steroid hormone into target cells, b) binding to the active conformation of a specific cytoplasmic receptor, c) activation of the receptor-steroid complex, d) binding of the activated complex to chromatin, e) regulation of specific RNA and protein syntheses and by that means expression of target cell specific responses. Some effects of steroid hormones, however, cannot be explained by this model of steroid hormone action.

Aldosterone↗

PubMed2005

Role of chromatin modification in flowering-time control.

The regulation of the FLC locus provides a plant model of how chromatin-modifying systems have emerged as important components in the control of a major developmental switch, the transition to flowering. Genetic and molecular studies have revealed that three systems of FLC regulation (vernalization, FRI and the autonomous pathway) all influence the state of FLC chromatin. Histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 4 and histone acetylation are associated with active FLC expression, whereas histone deacetylation and histone H3 dimethylation at lysines 9 and 27 are involved in FLC repression. These chromatin modifications provide an additional level of regulation of gene expression beyond that of the transcription factors that recruit RNA polymerase to target genes.

Arabidopsis↗

PubMed2004

Phylogenetic analysis of the ING family of PHD finger proteins.

Since the discovery of ING1 class II tumor suppressors in 1996, five different ING genes (ING1 to ING5) encoding proteins with highly conserved plant homeodomain (PHD) motifs and several splicing isoforms of the ING1 and ING2 gene have been identified. The ING family functions in DNA repair and apoptosis in response to UV damage through binding to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA); chromatin remodeling and regulation of gene expression through regulating and/or targeting histone acetyltransferase/deacetylase (HAT/HDAC) activities; binding targets of rare phosphatidylinositol phosphates (PtdInsPs) that function in DNA damage-initiated stress signaling; and regulating brain tumor angiogenesis through transcriptional repression of NF-KB-responsive genes. To elucidate the evolutionary history of ING proteins and summarize what is known about regions highly conserved in the ING family members, we have examined the sequences and phylogenetic relationships of ING proteins across taxonomically diverse organisms. We have identified novel ING family members in rats, frogs, fish, mosquitoes, fruit flies, worms, fungi, and plants. We have also clarified the naming and classification of ING proteins based on our phylogenetic analysis to allow better understanding of the ING protein family. Using sequence similarities, we have identified novel regions and motifs of unknown function that are conserved across family members. An evolutionary history for the ING family of PHD finger proteins is presented that indicates that five ING genes are present in vertebrates. Three of these may be paralogs of ING genes found in arthropods, whereas nematodes, fungi, and green plants contain ING genes that have general features of the vertebrate ING family.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2025

Mapping Allosteric Communication in the Nucleosome with Conditional Activity.

The nucleosome core particle (NCP) regulates genome accessibility through dynamic allosteric communication between histone proteins and DNA. Building on the concept of conditional activity introduced by Lin (2016), we use molecular dynamics simulations and develop an open-source Python library, CONDACT (CONDitional ACTivity), to quantify time-resolved kinetic correlations in nucleosome systems. We analyze long-time simulations of the nucleosome core particle, including two different DNA sequences, the Widom-601 and ASP (alpha-satellite palindromic) sequences. By tracking dihedral angle transitions, we identify residues with high dynamical memory and map inter-residue communication pathways across histone subunits and DNA. Our analysis reveals kinetically connected domains involving post-translational modification sites, oncogenic mutation sites, and DNA contact regions, with dynamic coupling observed over distances up to 7.5 nm. These findings offer new insight into the long-range allosteric behavior of the nucleosome and its potential role in regulating chromatin accessibility. Quantifying this allosteric behavior potentially identifies targetable residues and domains for therapeutic intervention.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2003

Memory by modification: the influence of chromatin structure on gene expression during vertebrate development.

Multicellular development is programmed by regulated interactions between transcription factors and target genes. Target genes function as nucleosomal arrays whose higher order structure, composition and accessibility to transcription machinery are strictly and dynamically controlled. Several classes of chromatin-associated proteins generate or remove localized, covalent chromatin modifications that signify gene expression status, whereas others modulate nucleosome organization and so regulate template availability for transcription. In vertebrates, covalent modification of the DNA template itself also has dramatic impacts on gene expression and development. Here I review recent discoveries that improve our understanding of the influence of chromatin structure on gene expression and I discuss their relevance to mechanisms of vertebrate development.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Metastasis tumor antigens, an emerging family of multifaceted master coregulators.

Regulation of fundamental genetic processes demands dynamic participation of transcription factors, their coregulators, and multiprotein chromatin remodeling activities at target genes. One family of chromatin modifiers that is ubiquitously expressed is the metastasis tumor antigens (MTA), which are integral parts of nucleosome remodeling and histone deacetylation (NuRD) complexes. MTA family members exist in distinct NuRD complexes, and functional redundancy is lacking among MTA family members. MTA proteins regulate divergent cellular pathways, including hormonal action, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions, differentiation, protein stability and development, and cell fate programs by modifying the acetylation status of crucial target genes. Intriguingly, at least one member of this family, MTA1, itself undergoes acetylation and acts as a coactivator in certain contexts. We discuss the roles of the MTA family of chromatin modifiers, with an emphasis on their physiologic functions.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

A growth hormone-releasing peptide that binds scavenger receptor CD36 and ghrelin receptor up-regulates sterol transporters and cholesterol efflux in macrophages through a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-dependent pathway.

Macrophages play a central role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis by accumulating cholesterol through increased uptake of oxidized low-density lipoproteins by scavenger receptor CD36, leading to foam cell formation. Here we demonstrate the ability of hexarelin, a GH-releasing peptide, to enhance the expression of ATP-binding cassette A1 and G1 transporters and cholesterol efflux in macrophages. These effects were associated with a transcriptional activation of nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma in response to binding of hexarelin to CD36 and GH secretagogue-receptor 1a, the receptor for ghrelin. The hormone binding domain was not required to mediate PPARgamma activation by hexarelin, and phosphorylation of PPARgamma was increased in THP-1 macrophages treated with hexarelin, suggesting that the response to hexarelin may involve PPARgamma activation function-1 activity. However, the activation of PPARgamma by hexarelin did not lead to an increase in CD36 expression, as opposed to liver X receptor (LXR)alpha, suggesting a differential regulation of PPARgamma-targeted genes in response to hexarelin. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that, in contrast to a PPARgamma agonist, the occupancy of the CD36 promoter by PPARgamma was not increased in THP-1 macrophages treated with hexarelin, whereas the LXRalpha promoter was strongly occupied by PPARgamma in the same conditions. Treatment of apolipoprotein E-null mice maintained on a lipid-rich diet with hexarelin resulted in a significant reduction in atherosclerotic lesions, concomitant with an enhanced expression of PPARgamma and LXRalpha target genes in peritoneal macrophages. The response was strongly impaired in PPARgamma(+/-) macrophages, indicating that PPARgamma was required to mediate the effect of hexarelin. These findings provide a novel mechanism by which the beneficial regulation of PPARgamma and cholesterol metabolism in macrophages could be regulated by CD36 and ghrelin receptor downstream effects.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter 1↗

PubMed1998

Energy-dependent chromatin remodelers: complex complexes and their components.

Chromatin structure is dynamically regulated such that it can be modified by a number of factors in response to a variety of signals. One class of factors that can mediate changes in chromatin structure is the ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complexes. Genetic and biochemical evidence supports the idea that a family of related multisubunit complexes hydrolyzes ATP in order to facilitate the rearrangement of chromatin structure. These complexes are conserved from yeast to mammals and apparently have diverse functions in modifying chromatin structure; ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers have been implicated in nucleosome deposition, nucleosome assembly, and disruption of nucleosome structure to facilitate transcriptional activation. In addition, individual components of these complexes have been linked to control of cell growth, cell cycle regulation, development, and differentiation, and they may also be targets for viral regulatory proteins. The diversity of subunit functions likely relates to effects on chromatin structure, suggesting that the regulation of chromatin structure by ATP-dependent remodelers is important in many different aspects of cellular metabolism.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

PubMed2000

Osa-containing Brahma chromatin remodeling complexes are required for the repression of wingless target genes.

The Wingless signaling pathway directs many developmental processes in Drosophila by regulating the expression of specific downstream target genes. We report here that the product of the trithorax group gene osa is required to repress such genes in the absence of the Wingless signal. The Wingless-regulated genes nubbin, Distal-less, and decapentaplegic and a minimal enhancer from the Ultrabithorax gene are misexpressed in osa mutants and repressed by ectopic Osa. Osa-mediated repression occurs downstream of the up-regulation of Armadillo but is sensitive both to the relative levels of activating Armadillo/Pangolin and repressing Groucho/Pangolin complexes present and to the responsiveness of the promoter to Wingless. Osa functions as a component of the Brahma chromatin-remodeling complex; other components of this complex are likewise required to repress Wingless target genes. These results suggest that altering the conformation of chromatin is an important mechanism by which Wingless signaling activates gene expression.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Functional analysis of p53 binding under differential stresses.

Hypoxia and DNA damage stabilize the p53 protein, but the subsequent effect that each stress has on transcriptional regulation of known p53 target genes is variable. We have used chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by CpG island (CGI) microarray hybridization to identify promoters bound by p53 under both DNA-damaging and non-DNA-damaging conditions in HCT116 cells. Using gene-specific PCR analysis, we have verified an association with CGIs of the highest enrichment (> 2.5-fold) (REV3L, XPMC2H, HNRPUL1, TOR1AIP1, glutathione peroxidase 1, and SCFD2), with CGIs of intermediate enrichment (> 2.2-fold) (COX7A2L, SYVN1, and JAG2), and with CGIs of low enrichment (> 2.0-fold) (MYC and PCNA). We found little difference in promoter binding when p53 is stabilized by these two distinctly different stresses. However, expression of these genes varies a great deal: while a few genes exhibit classical induction with adriamycin, the majority of the genes are unchanged or are mildly repressed by either hypoxia or adriamycin. Further analysis using p53 mutated in the core DNA binding domain revealed that the interaction of p53 with CGIs may be occurring through both sequence-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Taken together, these experiments describe the identification of novel p53 target genes and the subsequent discovery of distinctly different expression phenomena for p53 target genes under different stress scenarios.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2004

The many colours of chromodomains.

Local differences in chromatin organisation may profoundly affect the activity of eukaryotic genomes. Regulation at the level of DNA packaging requires the targeting of structural proteins and histone-modifying enzymes to specific sites and their stable or dynamic interaction with the nucleosomal fiber. The "chromodomain", a domain shared by many regulators of chromatin structure, has long been suspected to serve as a module mediating chromatin interactions in a variety of different protein contexts. However, recent functional analyses of a number of different chromodomains revealed an unexpected diversity of interaction targets, including histones, DNA and even RNA. The chromodomains of today seem to have evolved from a common ancestral fold to fulfill various functions in different molecular contexts. Combining information gained from recent functional and structural studies of chromodomains with a bioinformatic classification of their structure could lead to the definition of sequence motifs with predictive quality for chromodomain function.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Genome-wide analysis of Polycomb targets in Drosophila melanogaster.

Polycomb group (PcG) complexes are multiprotein assemblages that bind to chromatin and establish chromatin states leading to epigenetic silencing. PcG proteins regulate homeotic genes in flies and vertebrates, but little is known about other PcG targets and the role of the PcG in development, differentiation and disease. Here, we determined the distribution of the PcG proteins PC, E(Z) and PSC and of trimethylation of histone H3 Lys27 (me3K27) in the D. melanogaster genome. At more than 200 PcG target genes, binding sites for the three PcG proteins colocalize to presumptive Polycomb response elements (PREs). In contrast, H3 me3K27 forms broad domains including the entire transcription unit and regulatory regions. PcG targets are highly enriched in genes encoding transcription factors, but they also include genes coding for receptors, signaling proteins, morphogens and regulators representing all major developmental pathways.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Chromatin complexes regulating gene expression in Drosophila.

Polycomb-group proteins form chromatin complexes at target genes such as Ubx, providing a cellular memory of gene activity in early development and determining the later activity of the gene. The complexes, whose constituents vary depending on site and genomic context, initiate at specific sites, but can extend to involve larger chromatin domains. How they persist through cell proliferation and how they silence gene activity are still open issues.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Novel ATPase of SNF2-like protein family interacts with androgen receptor and modulates androgen-dependent transcription.

Nuclear receptors, including the androgen receptor (AR), regulate target cell transcription through interaction with auxiliary proteins to modify chromatin structure. We describe herein a novel AR-interacting protein, termed ARIP4, that has structural features typical of the SNF2-like protein family. With regard to the Snf2 domain, the closest homolog of ARIP4 is the ATRX protein. ARIP4 is a nuclear protein and comprises 1466 amino acids. It interacts with AR in vitro and in cultured yeast and mammalian cells. ARIP4 can be labeled with 8-azido-[gamma-32P]ATP and exhibits DNA-dependent ATPase activity. Like several ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling proteins, ARIP4 generates superhelical torsion within linear DNA fragments in an ATP-dependent manner. With a stably integrated target promoter, ARIP4 elicits a modest enhancement of AR-dependent transactivation. In transient cotransfection assays, ARIP4 modulates AR function in a promoter-dependent manner; it enhances receptor activity on minimal promoters, but does not activate more complex promoters. ARIP4 mutants devoid of ATPase activity fail to alter DNA topology and behave as trans-dominant negative regulators of AR function in transient assays.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

PubMed2005

Molecular signature of retinoic acid treatment in acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a distinct subtype of acute myeloid leukemia characterized by a block of differentiation at the promyelocytic stage. APL patients respond to pharmacological concentrations of all-trans retinoic acid (RA) and disease remission correlates with terminal differentiation of leukemic blasts. The PML/RAR oncogenic transcription factor is responsible for both the pathogenesis of APL and for its sensitivity to RA. In order to identify physiological targets of RA therapy, we analysed gene expression profiles of RA-treated APL blasts and found 1056 common target genes. Comparing these results to those obtained in RA-treated U937 cell lines revealed that transcriptional response to RA is largely dependent on the expression of PML/RAR. Several genes involved in the control of differentiation and stem cell renewal are early targets of RA regulation, and may be important effectors of RA response. Modulation of chromatin modifying genes was also observed, suggesting that specific structural changes in local chromatin domains may be required to promote RA-mediated differentiation. Computational analysis of upstream genomic regions in RA target genes revealed nonrandom distribution of transcription factor binding sites, indicating that specific transcriptional regulatory complexes may be involved in determining RA response.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed2006

Btg2 enhances retinoic acid-induced differentiation by modulating histone H4 methylation and acetylation.

Retinoic acid controls hematopoietic differentiation through the transcription factor activity of its receptors. They act on specific target genes by recruiting protein complexes that deacetylate or acetylate histones and modify chromatin status. The regulation of this process is affected by histone methyltransferases, which can inhibit or activate transcription depending on their amino acid target. We show here that retinoic acid treatment of hematopoietic cells induces the expression of BTG2. Overexpression of this protein increases RARalpha transcriptional activity and the differentiation response to retinoic acid of myeloid leukemia cells and CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors. In the absence of retinoic acid, BTG2 is present in the RARalpha transcriptional complex, together with the arginine methyltransferase PRMT1 and Sin3A. Overexpressed BTG2 increases PRMT1 participation in the RARalpha protein complex on the RARbeta promoter, a target gene model, and enhances gene-specific histone H4 arginine methylation. Upon RA treatment Sin3A, BTG2, and PRMT1 detach from RARalpha and thereafter BGT2 and PRMT1 are driven to the cytoplasm. These events prime histone H4 demethylation and acetylation. Overall, our data show that BTG2 contributes to retinoic acid activity by favoring differentiation through a gene-specific modification of histone H4 arginine methylation and acetylation levels.

Acetylation↗

PubMed2006

An integrated map of p53-binding sites and histone modification in the human ENCODE regions.

TP53 (tumor protein p53; p53) regulates its target genes under various cellular stresses. By combining chromatin immunoprecipitation with oligonucleotide microarrays, we have mapped binding sites of p53 (p53-BS) in the genome of HCT116 human colon carcinoma cells, along with those of acetylated H3, acetylated H4, and methylated H3-K4. We analyzed a 30-Mb portion of the human genome selected as a representative model by the ENCODE Consortium. In the region, we found 37 p53-BS, of which the p53-binding motif was present in 32 (86%). Acetylated histone H3 and H4 were detected at 14 (38%) and 33 (89%) of the p53-BS, respectively. A significant portion (58%) of H4 acetylation in the p53-BS was not accompanied by H3 acetylation. Acetyl H3 were preferentially located at the 5' and 3' ends of genes, whereas acetyl H4 were distributed widely across the genome. These results provide novel insights into how p53 binding coordinates with histone modification in human.

Acetylation↗

PubMed1999

Composite co-activator ARC mediates chromatin-directed transcriptional activation.

Gene activation in eukaryotes is regulated by complex mechanisms in which the recruitment and assembly of the transcriptional machinery is directed by gene- and cell-type-specific DNA-binding proteins. When DNA is packaged into chromatin, the regulation of gene activation requires new classes of chromatin-targeting activity. In humans, a multisubunit cofactor functions in a chromatin-selective manner to potentiate synergistic gene activation by the transcriptional activators SREBP-1a and Sp1. Here we show that this activator-recruited cofactor (ARC) interacts directly with several different activators, including SREBP-1a, VP16 and the p65 subunit of NF-kappaB, and strongly enhances transcription directed by these activators in vitro with chromatin-assembled DNA templates. The ARC complex consists of 16 or more subunits; some of these are novel gene products, whereas others are present in other multisubunit cofactors, such as CRSP, NAT and mammalian Mediator. Detailed analysis indicates that the ARC complex is probably identical to the nuclear hormone-receptor cofactor DRIP. Thus, ARC/DRIP is a large composite co-activator that belongs to a family of related cofactors and is targeted by different classes of activator to mediate transcriptional stimulation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗