SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “outcomes”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Standardized tuberculosis treatment outcome monitoring in Europe. Recommendations of a Working Group of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Region of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (IUATLD) for uniform reporting by cohort analysis of treatment outcome in tuberculosis patients.

Consensus-based recommendations have been developed by a Working Group of the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (IUATLD) on uniform reporting of tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcome data in countries in Europe. The main purpose of treatment monitoring is to find out how many of the potential infectious TB patients notified were declared cured at the end of treatment. Following the uniform case definitions as defined in 1996, emphasis is placed on cohort analysis of definite cases of pulmonary TB. The Working Group recommends using a minimal set of six mutually exclusive categories of treatment outcome: cure, treatment completed, failure, death, treatment interrupted, and transfer out. More detailed subsets may be chosen. Treatment outcome is expressed as a percentage of the total number of cases notified. Analysis should be separate for new and retreatment cases. Treatment outcome data have to be collected at the local level and passed on to regional and national authorities on an ongoing basis. Evaluation of treatment results becomes, preferably, an inbuilt component of national monitoring of programme performance. Because of the long duration of treatment, it is recommended that analysis is carried out in the first quarter of the calendar year that follows a full year after the last patient was enrolled. Feedback is essential. Treatment outcome results should become an inseparable part of the annual report on tuberculosis.

Cohort Studies↗

PubMed2003

Perioperative complications and neurological outcomes of first and second craniotomies among patients enrolled in the Glioma Outcome Project.

OBJECT: In many new clinical trials of patients with malignant gliomas surgical intervention is incorporated as an integral part of tumor-directed interstitial therapies such as gene therapy, biodegradable wafer placement, and immunotherapy. Assessment of toxicity is a major component of evaluating these novel therapeutic interventions, but this must be done in light of known complication rates of craniotomy for tumor resection. Factors predicting neurological outcome would also be helpful for patient selection for surgically based clinical trials. METHODS: The Glioma Outcome Project is a prospectively compiled database containing information on 788 patients with malignant gliomas that captured clinical practice patterns and patient outcomes. Patients in this series who underwent their first or second craniotomy were analyzed separately for presenting symptoms, tumor and patient characteristics, and perioperative complications. Preoperative and intraoperative factors possibly related to neurological outcome were evaluated. There were 408 patients who underwent first craniotomies (C1 group) and 91 patients who underwent second ones (C2 group). Both groups had similar patient and tumor characteristics except for their median age (55 years in the C1 group compared with 50 years in the C2 group; p = 0.006). Headache was more common at presentation in the C1 group, whereas papilledema and an altered level of consciousness were more common at presentation in patients undergoing second surgeries. Perioperative complications occurred in 24% of patients in the C1 group and 33% of patients in the C2 group (p = 0.1). Most patients were the same or better neurologically after surgery, but more patients in the C2 group (18%) displayed a worsened neurological status than those in the C1 group (8%; p = 0.007). The Karnofsky Performance Scale score and, in patients in the C2 group, tumor size were important neurological outcome predictors. Regional complications occurred at similar rates in both groups. Systemic infections occurred more frequently in the C2 group (4.4 compared with 0%; p < 0.0001) as did depression (20 compared with 11%; p = 0.02). The perioperative mortality rate was 1.5% for the C1 group and 2.2% for the C2 group (p = not significant). The median length of the hospital stay was 4 days in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative complications occur slightly more often following a second craniotomy for malignant glioma than after the first craniotomy. This should be considered when evaluating toxicities from intraoperative local therapies requiring craniotomy. Nevertheless, most patients are neurologically stable or improved after either their first or second craniotomy. This data set may serve as a benchmark for neurosurgeons and others in a discussion of operative risks in patients with malignant gliomas.

Central Nervous System Neoplasms↗

PubMed1998

Visual outcomes of cataract surgery in the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain. Report From the International Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare visual outcomes obtained following cataract surgery in 4 sites in North America and Europe where considerable differences in the organization of care and patterns of clinical practice have been previously described. METHODS: Patients scheduled for first eye-cataract surgery and aged 50 years or older were enrolled consecutively in a prospective multicenter study that collected clinical and patient interview data preoperatively and postoperatively. From the United States, 772 patients were enrolled; from the Province of Manitoba (Canada), 159; from Denmark, 291; and from the City of Barcelona (Spain), 200. Preoperative and 4-month postoperative visual acuity was obtained for 92% of the patients (n = 1291). RESULTS: The mean 4-month postoperative visual acuity of eyes operated on varied significantly across the 4 sites (P < .001) and had the following Snellen decimal fraction measurements: 0.49 in Barcelona, 0.65 in Denmark, 0.66 in Manitoba, and 0.74 in the United States. However, while crude visual acuity outcome figures varied significantly, no significant difference was observed across the 4 sites regarding the risk of poorer visual outcome after controlling for differences in age, preoperative visual acuity, and general health status for patients with no ocular comorbidity. Older age, poorer preoperative visual acuity, poorer preoperative general health status, and coexisting ocular comorbidity were predictors of a poorer visual outcome. CONCLUSION: A previously identified variation in treatment modalities across the 4 sites did not seem to affect patients' visual acuity outcomes.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

The Patient Outcomes of Surgery-Head/Neck (POS-head/neck): a new patient-based outcome measure.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a new patient-based outcome measure in plastic surgery for head/neck skin lesions for use in audit, clinical trials and effectiveness studies. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: Questionnaire development and validation study. Qualitative methods, including interviews with 27 patients, were carried out to develop a preliminary version of the questionnaire. The questionnaire was then field tested by postal survey of 141 pre- and 250 post-surgery patients to produce a shortened (item-reduced) questionnaire and to evaluate acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness. A second field test was carried out by postal survey in an independent sample of 67 pre-surgery patients to further evaluate the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychometric properties of acceptability, reliability, validity, and responsiveness were assessed. RESULTS: We developed a new measure, the Patient Outcomes of Surgery-Head/Neck (POS-Head/Neck), which includes a six- and nine-item pre- and post-surgery questionnaire, respectively. Results confirmed the acceptability (missing data <10%, evenly distributed endorsement frequencies), reliability (Cronbach alphas >0.76, item-total correlations >0.22), validity (scale inter-correlations r=0.50, scaling assumptions, correlations with age and sex < -0.25) and responsiveness (effect size=0.63) of the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The POS-Head/Neck is a new surgical outcome measure that can be used to evaluate outcomes in malignant and benign head/neck skin lesions before and after surgery is acceptable to patients and satisfies rigorous scientific criteria.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Delivery before 32 weeks of gestation for maternal pre-eclampsia: neonatal outcome and 2-year developmental outcome.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In the literature, there are conflicting data on the neonatal outcome in preterm infants who were delivered for maternal pre-eclampsia. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of maternal pre-eclampsia on neonatal morbidity and 2-year developmental outcome in a population of preterm infants delivered before 32 weeks of gestation. METHODS: The hospital records of all 89 surviving VLBW infants with GA below 32 weeks born from January 1997 to December 1999 were reviewed retrospectively. Data on respiratory outcome, sepsis and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) were compiled and analyzed for their association to maternal pre-eclampsia. Seventy-eight infants were assessed employing the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for developmental outcome at 2 years of corrected age. RESULTS: There was no difference in neonatal morbidity between groups. More infants born to pre-eclamptic mothers had lower MDI scores at 24 months of age (P=0.04) as compared to infants without maternal pre-eclampsia. After multiple logistic regression analysis, pre-eclampsia (P=0.007, OR=10.8) remained a significant risk factor of mildly delayed MDI at 24 months of age. CONCLUSION: Delivery before 32 weeks because of pre-eclampsia was associated with an increased risk of poor cognitive outcome. There was no significant difference in the postnatal course in comparison with infants born after pregnancies not complicated by pre-eclampsia.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Health outcomes are about choices and values: an economic perspective on the health outcomes movement.

The aim of the health outcomes movement is to reorientate health services so that the spotlight shines less on what is done and more on what is achieved. The health outcomes movement, thus far, has been most successful in addressing what appear to be technical questions relating to the measurement and analysis of health outcomes and in placing their routine use on the agenda of clinical practice and health services planning. If there is one lesson to be drawn from an economic perspective, however, it is that health outcomes are about values and not just technicalities. The need to make choices forces one to consider whether what is achieved is also what is most valued. The success of health service delivery, be it at a clinical, planning or systems level, must therefore be measured against agreed objectives. It follows that time must be taken to establish what patients and the community want from their health services and what each is prepared to give up to achieve its ends. Value judgements are unavoidable. The challenge lies not in measuring the outcomes of health interventions but in deciding what the objectives of the health system ought to be.

Australia↗

PubMed2003

Visual functional outcomes of cataract surgery in the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain: report of the International Cataract Surgery Outcomes Study.

PURPOSE: To compare functional outcomes after cataract surgery performed at 4 sites in 4 countries that have been described as having significant differences in the organization of care and patterns of clinical practice. SETTING: Multicenter cohort study from the United States, Canada, Denmark, and Spain. METHODS: Clinical data and patient interview data were collected preoperatively and 4 months postoperatively. Functional outcomes were assessed by the Visual Function Index (VF-14), a self-reported measure of visual function. Scores on the VF-14 range from 0 (maximum impairment) to 100 (no impairment). RESULTS: Unilateral surgery was performed in 1073 patients. In this subgroup, the odds of achieving an optimal functional outcome (VF-14 score > or =95) were similar among sites after controlling for differences in case mix. Bilateral surgery was performed in 211 patients. A postoperative visual acuity of 0.50 or better in both eyes was reported in 155 patients. However, 37% of these patients reported visual function impairment (VF-14 score <95). CONCLUSIONS: A previously identified variation in treatment modalities among the 4 sites did not have a significant effect on the odds of achieving an optimal functional outcome. In addition to visual acuity measurements, the VF-14 index provides information on functional outcomes that is useful, especially in studies assessing the benefits of cataract surgery in a public health care setting.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Outcomes research: getting started, defining outcomes, a framework, and data sources.

As key providers of care and as participants in systems delivering care, APNs are in ideal positions to explore, identify, measure, and evaluate patient outcomes. This article has provided an overview of some of the basic knowledge and skills required to undertake outcome studies. Through the application of these basic principles, the beginning APN can start to explore patient outcomes via quality improvement activities. With mastery and expansion of these principles, the expert APN can easily progress into outcomes research studies, which provide substantive contributions to the outcomes research agenda.

Data Collection↗

PubMed1998

Multivariate analysis of outcome of mental health care using graphical chain models. The South-Verona Outcome Project 1.

BACKGROUND: Short-term outcome of mental health care was assessed in a multidimensional perspective using graphical chain models, a new multivariate method that analyses the relationship between variables conditionally, i.e. taking into account the effect of antecedent and intervening variables. METHODS: GAF, BPRS, DAS (at baseline and after 6 months), LQL and VSSS (at follow-up only) were administered to 194 patients attending the South-Verona community-based mental health service. Direct costs in the interval were also calculated. Graphical chain models were used to analyse: (1) the associations between predictors (psychopathology, disability, functioning, assessed at baseline); (2) the effects of predictors on costs; and (3) the effect of predictors and costs on outcomes (psychopathology, disability, functioning, quality of life and service satisfaction) as well as their correlation. RESULTS: Psychopathology, disability and functioning scores at baseline predicted the corresponding scores at 6-month follow-up, with greater improvement in the more severely ill. Higher psychopathology and poorer functioning at baseline predicted higher costs and, in turn, costs predicted poorer functioning at follow-up. Outcome indicators polarized in two groups: psychopathology, disability and functioning, which were highly correlated; and the dyad service satisfaction and quality of life. Service satisfaction was highly related to quality of life and was predicted by low disability and high dysfunctioning. No predictors for quality of life were found. CONCLUSIONS: Graphical chain models were demonstrated to be a useful methodology to analyse process and outcome data. The results of the present study help in formulating specific hypotheses for future studies on outcome.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Feasibility, usefulness, limitations and perspectives of routine outcome assessment: the South Verona Outcome Project.

Closing the gap between research and clinical practice is nowadays considered a priority in outcome studies. Survey studies in community settings having as their main aim the multidimensional measure of outcome of mental health care interventions, including the use of standardised instruments administered as part of the routine clinical activities in mental health services, have recently started to be planned in various countries, but have encountered several difficulties. A naturalistic, longitudinal study aimed to assess the outcome of care provided by a community-based mental health service, the South Verona Outcome Project, has been conducted in Italy starting from the beginning of the 90's and is running since then. This paper: a) describes a series of methodological aspects of the South Verona Outcome Project, such as instruments, study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, training of the staff, and focuses on strategies used so to ensure feasibility of the assessment and good quality of the data; b) summarises some results of the study, characteristics of feed-back provided, and outputs; c) discusses the problems faced, the impact of this approach on service provision, its limitations and future perspectives.

Community Mental Health Services↗

PubMed2002

Rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients after a first stroke: effect of cognitive status at admission on the functional outcome.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether, and to what extent, cognitive outcome relates to overall functional outcome among elderly stroke patients. DESIGN: Nonconcurrent prospective study. SETTING: Geriatric rehabilitation division at a large, urban, academic, freestanding hospital in Israel. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred thirty-six patients aged 60 years and older admitted consecutively for rehabilitation after first acute stroke. Inclusion criteria were met by 315 patients, who were included in the final analysis. Average age was 75.3 years. The stroke was right sided in 44.1%. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The motor subscale of the FIM instrument assessed functional status. Absolute functional gain was determined by the FIM motor gain. Relative functional gain was calculated according to the Montebello Rehabilitation Factor Score. Cognitive status was assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the FIM cognitive subscale. RESULTS: FIM scores increased significantly during rehabilitation, mainly due to improvement in motor functioning. A strong association was found between the cognitive scales (r=.853, P<.001). Better rehabilitation outcomes were observed in patients with higher admission cognitive status, adjusting for the effect of age, sex, onset to admission interval, length of stay, and severity of stroke (odds ratio = 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.5). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired cognitive status at admission negatively affects the rehabilitation outcome of elderly stroke patients. The utility of routinely using a cognitive test for all patients before admission to rehabilitation, preferably the MMSE, is emphasized. The time, cost, and effort involved in performing such a test are negligible, and the potential benefits are considerable.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2006

Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: part I--what is a "good" outcome?

Over the past 20 years, there have been many advances in the field of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Despite these advances, there are no data on the long-term outcomes of AAC interventions. This study evaluated the long-term outcomes for a group of seven young men (ages 19-23 years) who had used AAC systems for at least 15 years and were part of the first generation to have received AAC services since they were in preschool. Outcomes were measured in the following domains: (a) receptive language; (b) reading comprehension; (c) communicative interaction; (d) linguistic complexity; (e) functional communication; (f) educational and vocational achievement; (g) self-determination; and (h) quality of life. The outcomes for the group were diverse, with individual variations across all measures. Evaluation of the data raised many issues surrounding the challenges of outcomes measurement; these are discussed with suggestions for future research.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

The association between cocaine use and short-term outcomes for the treatment of heroin dependence: findings from the Australian Treatment Outcome Study (ATOS).

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of cocaine use among individuals presenting for treatment for heroin dependence, describe the clinical profile of heroin users who also use cocaine and to establish the effects of cocaine use on short term outcomes for the treatment for heroin dependence. A longitudinal follow-up of 549 heroin users recruited in Sydney for the Australian Treatment Outcome Study was conducted at 3-month post-baseline interview. At baseline, current cocaine use was common (39%) and was associated with increased drug use, needle risk taking and criminality. The 3-month prevalence of cocaine use declined significantly to 19%. Thirty-five per cent of those who had used cocaine at baseline continued to use at 3 months, while 9% of the sample had commenced cocaine use. Those who entered residential rehabilitation at baseline were less likely than other treatment entrants and the non-treatment group to have used cocaine at follow-up. Treatment retention was not affected by baseline cocaine use status; however, baseline cocaine users (CU) displayed higher levels of heroin use, polydrug use and drug-related problems. A poorer outcome was associated with the commencement or continuation of cocaine use, while cessation of cocaine use resulted in significant improvements on these measures. Cocaine use was common among individuals seeking treatment for heroin dependence and was an important moderator of treatment outcome. It appears that cocaine use has a strong negative effect on treatment outcome over and above that caused by polydrug use generally.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Implementation and outcomes of commercial disease management programs in the United States: the disease management outcomes consolidation survey.

Despite widespread adoption of disease management (DM) programs by US health plans, gaps remain in the evidence for their benefit. The Disease Management Outcomes Consolidation Survey was designed to gather data on DM programs for commercial health plans, to assess program success and DM effectiveness. The questionnaire was mailed to 292 appropriate health plan contacts; 26 plans covering more than 14 million commercial members completed and returned the survey. Respondents reported that DM plays a significant and increasing role in their organizations. Key reasons for adopting DM were improving clinical outcomes, reducing medical costs and utilization, and improving member satisfaction. More respondents were highly satisfied with clinical results than with utilization or cost outcomes of their programs (46%, 17%, and 13%, respectively). Detailed results were analyzed for 57 DM programs with over 230,000 enrollees. Most responding plans offered DM programs for diabetes and asthma, with return on investment (ROI) ranging from 0.16:1 to 4:1. Weighted by number of enrollees per DM program, average ROI was 2.56:1 for asthma (n = 1,136 enrollees) and 1.98:1 for diabetes (n = 25,364). Most (but not all) respondents reported reduced hospital admissions, increasing rates of preventive care, and improved clinical measures. Few respondents provided detailed information about DM programs for other medical conditions, but most that did reported positive outcomes. Lack of standardized methodology was identified as a major barrier to in-house program evaluation. Although low response rate precluded drawing many general conclusions, a clear need emerged for more rigorous evaluation methods and greater standardization of outcomes measurement.

Disease Management↗

PubMed2000

Linking nursing care interventions with client outcomes: a community-based application of an outcomes model.

This article describes a conceptual model that provides an organizing framework for assessing client outcomes in community-based settings. The "Outcomes Model for Community-Based Settings" (OMCBS) examines the relationships among structure, process, and outcomes juxtaposed to the dimensions of client, provider, and setting including sample measures for each variable. OMCBS incorporates the Omaha System including its comprehensive list of client health problems, nursing interventions, and an outcome rating scale assessing client knowledge, behavior, and health status to standardize nursing care and client outcomes. The OMCBS provides a strategy to evaluate the effectiveness of nursing interventions for clients in a variety of milieus.

Community Health Nursing↗

PubMed1997

The outcome of medical outcomes assessment: it's not necessarily academic.

The outcomes assessment movement has the potential to significantly enhance the practice of medicine by enabling physicians to identify and implement what works. It represents a rich wellspring of material for investigation and is already proving to be an important source of research support. As such, it also represents a boon to academic medicine, whose activities in patient care, research, and education it may enrich. Yet outcomes research may also prove itself a threat to academic medicine insofar as the "outcomes" of the academic medical center are not adequately represented in its deliberations and recommendations. Ultimately, the results of the outcomes movement will be defined--both now and in the generation to come--by medicine's guiding vision. It behooves those who care about academic medicine to recall that this vision itself is a highly prized outcome.

Academic Medical Centers↗

PubMed2002

Gender differences in long-term posttraumatic stress disorder outcomes after major trauma: women are at higher risk of adverse outcomes than men.

BACKGROUND: The importance of psychological morbidity after major trauma, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), is continuing to gain attention in trauma outcomes research. The Trauma Recovery Project is a large prospective epidemiologic study designed to examine multiple outcomes after major trauma, including quality of life (QoL) and PTSD. Patient outcomes were assessed at discharge and at 6, 12, and 18 months after discharge. The specific objectives of the present report are to examine gender differences in prolonged PTSD (L-PTSD) and to assess the impact of PTSD by gender on QoL at the 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up time points in the Trauma Recovery Project population. METHODS: Between December 1, 1993, and September 1, 1996, 1,048 eligible trauma patients triaged to four participating trauma center hospitals in the San Diego Regionalized Trauma System were enrolled in the study. The enrollment criteria for the study included the following: age 18 years and older; admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12 or greater; and length of stay greater than 24 hours. QoL was measured after injury using the Quality of Well-being (QWB) scale, a sensitive index to the well end of the functioning continuum (range: 0 = death to 1.000 = optimum functioning). Early symptoms of acute stress reaction (SASR) at discharge were assessed using the Impact of Events Scale (score > 30 = SASR). PTSD at 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-up was diagnosed using standardized Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, criteria. PTSD (L-PTSD) was diagnosed if full or partial (F + P) or full (F) PTSD Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, criteria were present at all follow-up time points. RESULTS: PTSD (L-PTSD) (F + P) was diagnosed in 35% (221 of 627) of patients at follow-up. PTSD (L-PTSD) (F) was present in 32% (153 of 627). Women were at significantly higher risk of PTSD (F + P) (odds ratio = 2.4, p = 0.001) and PTSD (F) (odds ratio = 2.8, p = 0.001) than men. The association of gender with PTSD was independent of mechanism and injury event-related factors such as perceived threat to life. In multivariate logistic regression, female gender, perceived threat to life, and SASR were strongly and independently associated with PTSD risk. Women were also at risk for worse QWB outcomes; beginning at discharge through the 18-month follow-up, women had significantly lower QWB scores at each follow-up time than men, regardless of prolonged PTSD status. CONCLUSION: These results provide important new evidence that high rates of PTSD persist in the long-term aftermath of major trauma. The association of gender with PTSD was independent of mechanism and injury event-related factors such as perceived threat to life. Within categories of specific mechanism of injury and injury event-related factors, women were at significantly higher risk of prolonged PTSD onset. Prolonged PTSD was associated with significantly reduced quality of life in both men and women, with markedly worse QWB outcomes in women regardless of prolonged PTSD status.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

PubMed2000

Generalists and oncologists show similar care practices and outcomes for hospitalized late-stage cancer patients. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks for Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to identify similarities and differences in primary attending physicians' (generalists' versus oncologists') care practices and outcomes for seriously ill hospitalized patients with malignancy. DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study (SUPPORT project). SETTING: Subjects were recruited from 5 US teaching hospitals; data were gathered from 1989 to 1994. SUBJECTS: Included in the study was a matched sample of 642 hospitalized patients receiving care for non-small-cell lung cancer, colon cancer metastasized to the liver, or multiorgan system failure associated with malignancy with either a generalist or an oncologist as the primary attending physician. MEASUREMENTS: Care practices and patient outcomes were determined from hospital records. Length of survival was identified with the National Death Index. Physicians' perceptions of patient's prognosis, preference for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and length of relationship were assessed by interview. A propensity score for receiving care from an oncologist was constructed. After propensity-based matching of patients, practices and outcomes of oncologists' and generalists' patients were assessed through group comparison techniques. RESULTS: Generalist and oncologist attendings showed comparable care practices, including the number of therapeutic interventions, eg, "rescue care" and chemotherapy, and the number of care topics discussed with patients/ families. Length of stay, discharge to supportive care, readmission, total hospital costs, and survival rates were similar. For both physician groups, perception of patients' wish for CPR was associated with rescue care (P < 0.03), and such care was related to higher hospital costs (P < 0.000). Poorer prognostic estimates predicted aggressiveness-of-care discussions by both types of physicians. Length of the patient-doctor relationship was associated with oncologists' care practices. More documented discussion about aggressiveness of care was related to higher hospital costs and shorter survival for patients in both physician groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Generalists and oncologists showed similar care practices and outcomes for comparable hospitalized late-stage cancer patients. Physicians' perceptions about patients' preferences for CPR and prognosis influenced decision making and outcomes for patients in both physician groups. Length of relationship with patients was associated only with oncologists' care practices. Rescue care increased hospital costs but had no effect on patient survival. Future studies should compare physicians' palliative care as well as acute-care practices in both inpatient and ambulatory care settings. Patients' end-of-life quality and interchange between physician groups should also be documented and compared.

Adult↗