SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “robotics”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Development of the first force-controlled robot for otoneurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE: In some surgical specialties (eg, orthopedics), robots are already used in the operating room for bony milling work. Otological surgery and otoneurosurgery may also greatly benefit from the enhanced precision of robotics. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study on robotic milling of oak wood and human temporal bone specimen. METHODS: A standard industrial robot with a six-degrees-of-freedom serial kinematics was used, with force feedback to proportionally control the robot speed. Different milling modes and characteristic path parameters were evaluated to generate milling paths based on computer-aided design (CAD) geometry data of a cochlear implant and an implantable hearing system. RESULTS: The best-suited strategy proved to be the spiral horizontal milling mode with the burr held perpendicular to the temporal bone surface. To reduce groove height, the distance between paths should equal half the radius of the cutting burr head. Because of the vibration of the robot's own motors, a high oscillation of the SD of forces was encountered. This oscillation dropped drastically to nearly 0 Newton (N) when the burr head made contact with the dura mater, because of its damping characteristics. The cutting burr could be kept in contact with the dura mater for an extended period without damaging it, because of the burr's blunt head form. The robot moved the burr smoothly according to the encountered resistances. CONCLUSION: The study reports the first development of a functional robotic milling procedure for otoneurosurgery with force-based speed control. Future plans include implementation of ultrasound-based local navigation and performance of robotic mastoidectomy.

Equipment Design↗

PubMed2004

The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the costs components of laparoscopic (LRP) and robot assisted prostatectomy (RAP), and compared their costs to those of open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A model was created using commercially available software to compare the costs of treatment with LRP, RAP or RRP. Hospital costs were obtained from a large county hospital. A literature search was performed to determine typical (average) robot costs, length of stay and operative time for RRP, LRP and RAP. We limited our analysis to mature series and included only the most recent efforts. The cost of the robot was estimated at 1,200,000 dollars with a 100,000 dollars yearly maintenance contract. It was assumed that the robot would be used across specialities for a total of 300 cases yearly in a 7-year period. We performed a series of 1 and 2-way sensitivity analyses to evaluate the costs of LRP, RAP and RRP, while varying robot costs, the number of robotic cases, hospital length of stay, operative time and cost of laparoscopic/robotic equipment. RESULTS: RRP was the most cost-effective approach with a cost advantage of 487 dollars and 1,726 dollars over LRP and RAP, respectively. If we excluded the initial cost of purchasing a robot, the cost difference between RRP and RAP was 1,155 dollars. This large difference in RRP and RAP costs resulted from a cost of 857 dollars per case to pay for robot purchase and maintenance, and the high cost of 1,705 dollars for equipment per case. An even shorter RAP operative time (140 vs 160 minutes) and length of stay (1.2 vs 2.5 days) did not compensate for the added expenditure. LRP cost more than RRP primarily due to equipment costs (533 dollars) since the shorter hospital stay (1.3 vs 2.5 days) was compensated for by longer operative time (200 vs 160 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: The costs of new technology are typically borne out in the first years of use and RAP is no exception with high robot costs for purchase, maintenance and operative equipment overshadowing savings gained by shorter length of stay. While RRP is currently the least costly approach, LRP has proved to be almost as cost competitive as RRP, whereas RAP will require a significant decrease in the cost of the device and maintenance fees.

Academic Medical Centers↗

PubMed2006

A novel robot training system designed to supplement upper limb physiotherapy of patients with spastic hemiparesis.

Spasticity is velocity and acceleration dependent, and it is therefore important to execute physiotherapeutic exercises at a relatively low and constant velocity. This can be more accurately managed by a robot than by a person when such exercises are administered continuously for more than 15-20 min. The purpose of this project was to construct a robot-mediated system that could support upper limb physiotherapy of patients with spastic hemiparesis. The system, unlike any known robotic therapeutic system, uses unmodified industrial robots to carry out passive physiotherapy on the upper limb (including the movements of the shoulder and the elbow). An initial trial was executed in order to assess its safety and to gain experience of the robot-mediated therapy. Four healthy subjects and eight patients with spastic hemiparesis were included. Each subject received 30-min-long robotic physiotherapy sessions over 20 consecutive workdays. The 12 participants received, in total, 240 robot-mediated physiotherapeutic sessions. No dangerous situation or considerable technical problem occurred; the robots executed the therapy programme as intended. Investigation of the effectiveness of this kind of therapy was not an aim of this initial trial; however, the patients' clinical status was followed and some favourable changes were found regarding the spasticity of elbow flexors and shoulder abductors. According to the experiences of the first clinical investigation, the programming interface and the mechanical interface device between the patient and the robots had been improved. A controlled clinical study is under way to assess the effectiveness of the REHAROB movement therapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To review the history, development, and current applications of robotics in surgery. BACKGROUND: Surgical robotics is a new technology that holds significant promise. Robotic surgery is often heralded as the new revolution, and it is one of the most talked about subjects in surgery today. Up to this point in time, however, the drive to develop and obtain robotic devices has been largely driven by the market. There is no doubt that they will become an important tool in the surgical armamentarium, but the extent of their use is still evolving. METHODS: A review of the literature was undertaken using Medline. Articles describing the history and development of surgical robots were identified as were articles reporting data on applications. RESULTS: Several centers are currently using surgical robots and publishing data. Most of these early studies report that robotic surgery is feasible. There is, however, a paucity of data regarding costs and benefits of robotics versus conventional techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery is still in its infancy and its niche has not yet been well defined. Its current practical uses are mostly confined to smaller surgical procedures.

Cardiac Surgical Procedures↗

PubMed2005

School-based use of a robotic arm system by children with disabilities.

A robotic arm system was developed for use by children who had very severe motor disabilities and varying levels of cognitive and language skills. The children used the robot in a three-task sequence routine to dig objects from a tub of dry macaroni. The robotic system was used in the child's school for 12-15 sessions over a period of four weeks. Goal attainment scaling indicated improvement in all children in operational competence of the robot, and varying levels of gain in functional skill development with the robot and in carryover to the classroom from the robot experiments. Teacher interviews revealed gains in classroom participation, expressive language (vocalizations, symbolic communication), and a high degree of interest by the children in the robot tasks. The teachers also recommended that the robot should have more color, contrast and character, as well as generating sounds and/or music for student cues. They also felt that the robotic system accuracy should be increased so that teacher assistance is not necessary to complete the task.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2001

A macroscopic analytical model of collaboration in distributed robotic systems.

In this article, we present a macroscopic analytical model of collaboration in a group of reactive robots. The model consists of a series of coupled differential equations that describe the dynamics of group behavior. After presenting the general model, we analyze in detail a case study of collaboration, the stick-pulling experiment, studied experimentally and in simulation by Ijspeert et al. [Autonomous Robots, 11, 149-171]. The robots' task is to pull sticks out of their holes, and it can be successfully achieved only through the collaboration of two robots. There is no explicit communication or coordination between the robots. Unlike microscopic simulations (sensor-based or using a probabilistic numerical model), in which computational time scales with the robot group size, the macroscopic model is computationally efficient, because its solutions are independent of robot group size. Analysis reproduces several qualitative conclusions of Ijspeert et al.: namely, the different dynamical regimes for different values of the ratio of robots to sticks, the existence of optimal control parameters that maximize system performance as a function of group size, and the transition from superlinear to sublinear performance as the number of robots is increased.

Computer Communication Networks↗

PubMed2000

A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with stroke, the authors tested whether additional sensorimotor training of the paralyzed or paretic upper limb delivered by a robotic device enhanced motor outcome. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with stroke and hemiparesis or hemiplegia received standard poststroke multidisciplinary rehabilitation, and were randomly assigned either to receive robotic training (at least 25 hours) or exposure to the robotic device without training. Outcomes were assessed by the same masked raters, before treatment began and at the end of treatment, with the upper extremity component of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment, the Motor Status score, the Motor Power score, and Functional Independence Measurement. RESULT: The robot treatment and control group had comparable clinical characteristics, lesion size, and pretreatment impairment scores. By the end of treatment, the robot-trained group demonstrated improvement in motor outcome for the trained shoulder and elbow (Motor Power score, p < 0.001; Motor Status score, p < 0. 01) that did not generalize to untrained wrist and hand. The robot-treated group also demonstrated significantly improved functional outcome (Functional Independence Measurement-Motor, p < 0. 01). CONCLUSION: Robot-delivered quantitative and reproducible sensorimotor training enhanced the motor performance of the exercised shoulder and elbow. The robot-treated group also demonstrated improved functional outcome. When added to standard multidisciplinary rehabilitation, robotics provides novel therapeutic strategies that focus on impairment reduction and improved motor performance.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

DaVinci robotic-assisted laparoscopic bariatric surgery: is it justified in a routine setting?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic silicone adjustable gastric banding (SAGB) has gained popularity for the surgical treatment of morbid obesity. The implantable gastric stimulator (IGS) system represents a novel surgical alternative. We aimed to assess the feasibility of robotic-assisted laparoscopic bariatric operations and to critically elucidate the technical and financial advantages and patient outcome. METHODS: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic bariatric procedures were performed on 10 consecutive patients using the daVinci robot system (4 SAGB, 4 IGS, 2 SAGB revisions). 10 conventional laparoscopic-operated patients (4 SAGB, 4 IGS, 2 SAGB revisions) during the learning curve served as controls. Equipment, operative technique and procedural time were evaluated. A cost analysis was calculated. RESULTS: The personnel equipment, numbers of trocars and operation technique were comparable in both groups. The mean operative time was 137 min (range 110-175) and 97 min (60-140) in robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy, respectively (P =0.04). Establishment of the pneumoperitoneum and placement of trocars and robotic arms took a mean of 30 min (15-45) in the robotic-assisted group, compared with 5 min in the control group (P <0.001). In 1 patient, intraoperative gastric injury was suspected and led to band removal in the robotic-assisted group. There was no postoperative complication. Average procedural costs were significantly higher in the robotic-assisted group. CONCLUSION: Primary and revisional robotic-assisted bariatric surgery is technically simple, with the benefit of precise instrument handling. However, it is still expensive, the set-up of the system is time-consuming, and a limited variety of instruments are available presently.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Robotic devices that provide passive guidance and stabilization of the legs and trunk during treadmill stepping may increase the delivery of locomotor training to subjects with neurological injury. Lower-extremity guidance also may reduce voluntary muscle activity as compared with compliant assistance provided by therapists. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in metabolic costs and lower-limb muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking. SUBJECTS: Twelve ambulatory subjects with motor incomplete spinal cord injury participated. METHODS: In 2 separate protocols, metabolic and electromyographic (EMG) data were collected during standing and stepping on a treadmill with therapist and robotic assistance. During robotic-assisted walking, subjects were asked to match the kinematic trajectories of the device and maximize their effort. During therapist-assisted walking, subjects walked on the treadmill with manual assistance provided as necessary. RESULTS: Metabolic costs and swing-phase hip flexor EMG activity were significantly lower when subjects were asked to match the robotic device trajectories than with therapist-assisted walking. These differences were reduced when subjects were asked to maximize their effort during robotic-assisted stepping, although swing-phase plantar-flexor EMG activity was increased. In addition, during standing prior to therapist- or robotic-assisted stepping, metabolic costs were higher without stabilization from the robotic device. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Differences in metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns between therapist- and robotic-assisted standing and stepping illustrate the importance of minimizing passive guidance and stabilization provided during step training protocols.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Analysis of procedure time in robot-assisted surgery: comparative study in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic surgery systems have been introduced to deal with the basic disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery. However, working with these systems may lead to time loss due to additional robot-specific tasks, such as set-up of equipment and sterile draping of the system. To evaluate loss of time in robot-assisted surgery, we compared 10 robot-assisted cholecystectomies to 10 standard laparoscopic cholecystectomies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The robot-assisted procedures were performed with the da Vinci telemanipulation system. The total time in the operating room (OR) was scored and divided into preoperative, operative, and postoperative phases. These phases were further divided into smaller time-frames to precisely define moments of time loss. RESULTS: The most significant difference between the two groups was found in the preoperative phase. Robot-related tasks led to time loss in all time-frames of this phase. In the operative phase, the trocar entry time-frame was longer in robot-assisted cases than in standard procedures. Additionally, postoperative OR clearing was longer in the robot-assisted cases. Total operating time did not differ significantly between the two procedures. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted surgery leads to time loss during preparation of routine laparoscopic procedures.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Implementation of robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a university hospital.

BACKGROUND: Robot surgery is a further step towards new potential developments in minimally invasive surgery. Surgeons must keep abreast of these new technologies and learn their limits and possibilities. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy has not yet been performed in our institution. The purpose of this report is to present the pathway of implementation of robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a university hospital. METHODS: The Zeus(R) robot system was used. Experimental training was performed on animals. The results of our experimental training allowed us to perform our first two clinical cases. RESULTS: Robot arm set-up and trocar placement required 53 and 35 minutes. Operative time were 59 and 45 minutes respectively. The overall operative time was 112 and 80 minutes, respectively. There were no intraoperative complications. Patients were discharged from the hospital after an overnight stay. CONCLUSION: Robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and patient recovery similar to those of standard laparoscopy. At present, there are no advantages of robotic over conventional surgery. Nevertheless, robots have the potential to revolutionise the way surgery is performed. Robot surgery is not reserved for a happy few. This technology deserves more attention because it has the potential to change the way surgery is performed.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.

Resource allocation, including manpower and other expenses, have limited the evolution of minimally invasive surgical procedures to provide humanism and to improve surgical care for patients. Robotic enhancement has been proposed as a mechanism to improve the cost-benefit relationship for patients. To this end, we have used the robotic arm enhancement to minimize resource and personnel utilization during minimally invasive procedures. Phase I of our study has included the use of the robotic arm in 24 laparoscopic hernia repairs, cholecystectomies, and nissen fundoplications with the surgeon as a solo surgeon, i.e., the primary surgeon is the only participant in the operative sterile field. The scrub nurse did not participate in the procedures. During this study, there were no technical mishaps, no complications related to the solo surgeon-robotic arm concept, and the operative times were statistically similar to equivalent procedures utilizing multiple personnel. The hernia repair is least complex and most amenable to solo surgery due to the use of only three access ports; cholecystectomy occasionally requires four access ports increasing its complexity to a measurable degree. Nissen fundoplication, however, requires five access ports and proved to be the most complex of the procedures to adapt successfully to solo surgery utilizing robotic arm enhancement. Phase II of our study has involved the use of a combination of technologically complex and sophisticated technology to improve outcomes in complex laparoscopic procedures. The head-mounted display, the robotic arm, and the harmonic scalpel have been used in 140 complex minimally invasive procedures; the procedures were laparoscopic spine surgery (24 cases), laparoscopic gastric surgery (28 cases), and laparoscopic colon resection (88 cases). The use of these sophisticated technologies added safety, improved versatility, and did not increase the length of the operative procedures. The use of multiple technologies had an additive effect on the benefits. There were no experiences in which the technologies contributed to a technical complication or an adverse result for the patients. However, the successful use of these technologies requires an in depth educational experience for the surgeon and for the operating room team. In a further effort to improve efficiency and control of the visual fields during minimally invasive surgery, we have implemented a prototype voice activation, head-directed control, and instrument tracking by robotic arm enhancement in order to control the visual field through computer programming. Prototype voice activation and deactivation also allows instruments to be used in the visual field for the surgical procedure while not being used for tracking of the visual field. Tracking with the instrument utilizing a color-coded tracking system, and the head-directed control system have both been 100% effective in our hands, have not induced errors in technical performance of procedures, and have shortened the time required for performance of specific procedural tasks. Further, this process improves versatility for the surgeon, increases concentration, reduces fatigue and does not interfere with the position of the surgeon. Areas for improvement which have been observed utilizing these techniques are (1) the use of appropriate and consistent voice activation terminology, (2) the proper positioning of the instrument tracking unit in the most appropriate locations on the video screen and on the instrument within the visual field, and (3) the appropriate use of head-directed control of the robotic arm. We have concluded from these experiences that the robotic technology will continue to reduce costs and minimize risk for patients undergoing minimally invasive surgical procedures; moreover, safety, versatility, and diminished use of resources will accrue utilizing the additive benefit of sequential sophisticated technologies requiring a simultaneous educational

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Development of a robotic navigation and fracture fixation system.

The use of robotics in surgery is nothing new. However, there are areas of surgery, such as in fracture fixation, where robots have yet to be implemented. This paper considers the choice of robot, gripper and ancillary equipment together with navigation systems necessary for their application. Hitherto robots have seen operation in surgery only in cases where relatively low manipulation forces are required. Nothing yet exists with the capability of handling forces in excess of 200 Newton as would be required in the above scenario. Another encumbrance to robots which are already in medical use is the difficulty in programming. Unfortunately most of these robots are programmed by specialists for a particular application. However, there exists a number of robot programming languages, like Unimation VA-LII (recently superceded by Stäubli V+), which do not require specialist knowledge. The application of industrial robots to the "heavier" side of modern surgery is without doubt technically realisable. The remainder of this research project aims to determine exactly which robots and what ancilliary equipment are needed and then to implement them, first on plastic models and later on cadavers. A second phase is expected to deal with type approval and a final third phase with operations on live patients.

Fracture Fixation↗

PubMed1988

Robotics in the clinical laboratory.

We are beginning to see the potential of robotics in the clinical laboratory through integration with automated analyzers and computer systems. However, there is a need for training programs that will prepare technologists to design and implement robotic systems for clinical laboratories. What will the robot laboratory of the future look like? We will see hospital laboratories begin to be located some distance away from the main facility because the labor component of staffing satellite laboratories will have been greatly reduced. Instrument manufacturers will see the need for analyzers that are robot-friendly and allow for simplified interfacing, both electronic and mechanical. Robots will become more versatile even to the point of performing complete instrument repair. Laboratories will be equipped with many task-oriented robotic stations, including, for example, accessioning and processing robots that prepare samples for transport by robotic carts. Analysis will be performed by a combination of robot and dedicated analyzer. Laboratory results will be reviewed by algorithms in the larger laboratory computer, which will alert the laboratory worker to unusual results. A large variety of analyses will be available to the patient with rapid turnaround. The end result will be more efficient health care delivery at reduced cost.

Computer Communication Networks↗

PubMed2001

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy.

Surgical laparoscopic robotic systems have been developed to transfer time-consuming, repetitive tasks from human to robot, thus increasing safety and improving surgical outcome. Laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy for unresectable pancreatic cancer has become widely accepted. The main manipulation of this operation is suturing, which could possibly be done with robotic assistance. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and the technical aspects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy. Sixteen pigs were divided into two groups of eight. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy (Roux-Y anastomosis) was performed in one group of animals (Group RLC). The second group was used as control and underwent a laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy using the ordinary laparoscopic instruments, except with robotic camera control (Group LC). Laparotomy and fluoroscopic examination were performed postoperatively. Animals in both groups tolerated the operations well. There was no significant difference in set-up time between groups. The operative time and the time for completing the two anastomoses were significantly longer in the RLC group. There was no leakage after anastomoses in any animal, as confirmed by laparotomy and fluoroscopy. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystojejunostomy is technically feasible. Stable images and comfortable manipulation can be obtained using this technique. One or two surgeons can perform this operation, assisted by the robotic system. The main disadvantages are longer operative time and the use of expensive devices. With improvements in robotic instruments and techniques, the operative time will be decreased and the technology could become widely accepted.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2004

Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus.

BACKGROUND: Previous results with the planar robot MIT-MANUS demonstrated positive benefits in trials with over 250 stroke patients. Consistent with motor learning, the positive effects did not generalize to other muscle groups or limb segments. Therefore we are designing a new class of robots to exercise other muscle groups or limb segments. This paper presents basic engineering aspects of a novel robotic module that extends our approach to anti-gravity movements out of the horizontal plane and a pilot study with 10 outpatients. Patients were trained during the initial six-weeks with the planar module (i.e., performance-based training limited to horizontal movements with gravity compensation). This training was followed by six-weeks of robotic therapy that focused on performing vertical arm movements against gravity. The 12-week protocol includes three one-hour robot therapy sessions per week (total 36 robot treatment sessions). RESULTS: Pilot study demonstrated that the protocol was safe and well tolerated with no patient presenting any adverse effect. Consistent with our past experience with persons with chronic strokes, there was a statistically significant reduction in tone measurement from admission to discharge of performance-based planar robot therapy and we have not observed increases in muscle tone or spasticity during the anti-gravity training protocol. Pilot results showed also a reduction in shoulder-elbow impairment following planar horizontal training. Furthermore, it suggested an additional reduction in shoulder-elbow impairment following the anti-gravity training. CONCLUSION: Our clinical experiments have focused on a fundamental question of whether task specific robotic training influences brain recovery. To date several studies demonstrate that in mature and damaged nervous systems, nurture indeed has an effect on nature. The improved recovery is most pronounced in the trained limb segments. We have now embarked on experiments that test whether we can continue to influence recovery, long after the acute insult, with a novel class of spatial robotic devices. This pilot results support the pursuit of further clinical trials to test efficacy and the pursuit of optimal therapy following brain injury.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Post-operative pain, nausea, vomiting and optic nerve sheath diameter following total intravenous versus inhalational anesthesia for adults undergoing robotic transabdominal surgery - a systematic review and meta- analysis.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of robotic-assisted abdominal surgery is aimed at reducing the primary and secondary adverse outcomes. Anesthesia in robotic surgery varies from anesthesia for open or laparoscopic surgical procedures. The choice of anesthesia influences the perioperative control of pain, nausea, vomiting, and Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The purpose of this systematic review was to assess outcome variation in patients undergoing transabdominal robot-assisted surgery done under total intravenous anesthesia or inhalational anesthesia. METHODOLOGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Google Scholar (January, 2017 to June, 2024). Search terms included "Anesthesia", "Robotics", "prostatectomy", hysterectomy", "nephrectomy", "cholecystectomy" and "cystectomy" with the Boolean operators "AND" and "OR". We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adults of both genders aged 18 years and above, who underwent transabdominal robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery and targeting the consequences related to TIVA or inhalational anesthesia. We reviewed titles and abstracts and proceeded to full-text articles of the eligible studies relevant to inclusion criteria. Mean and standard deviations with 95% CI were calculated. Forest plots were used to present data visually. RESULTS: Six studies (340 patients) were included. We found only one study in which post-operative pain was assessed and results favored intravenous anesthesia in robotic transabdominal surgery. Only two studies reported post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Both studies stated that PONV is reported in few patients in the inhalation anesthesia group. We found evidence suggesting that change in ONSD measurements at 10 min after induction (MD 0.04,95% CI -0.02 to 0.11 p = 0.19) and 40-60 min after Trendelenburg position (MD -0.26, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.17, p = 0.16) are much less in intravenous anesthesia group than in inhalation anesthesia group. Total intravenous anesthesia maintains the ONSD and hence the ICP better than inhalational anesthesia in robotic transabdominal surgery with CO2 pneumoperitoneum in Trendelenburg positioning requirements. It would be a safer choice than inhalational anesthesia due to fewer adverse events. CONCLUSION: This review concludes that TIVA is a better choice than inhalational anesthesia for transabdominal robotic-assisted surgery in urology, gynecology, and gastroenterology in both male and female patients.

Humans↗

PubMed1997

The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke.

BACKGROUND: We used MIT-Manus, a robot designed to provide interactive, goal-directed motor activity for clinical neurologic applications. OBJECTIVE: To test whether this robotic manipulation of the impaired limb influenced motor recovery in patients with hemiplegia. METHODS: Sequential patients with a history of a single stroke and hemiplegia (N = 20) hospitalized on the same acute care rehabilitation floor were enrolled in a standard rehabilitation program supplemented by either robot-aided therapy or sham robot-aided therapy. These 2 groups were comparable in age, initial physical impairment, and time between onset of the stroke and enrollment in the trial. Patients, clinical team members, and the clinical evaluator were blinded to the treatment group assignments. Standardized assessment tools measured outcomes. RESULTS: Impairment and disability declined in both groups between hospital admission and discharge. The robot-treated group showed a greater degree of improvement in all 3 measures of motor recovery, and the change in motor status measured in the proximal upper limb musculature was significant (P = .002). No adverse events resulted from robot-assisted therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that robotic manipulation of the impaired limb may favorably add to recovery following stroke and that robotics may provide new strategies for neurologic rehabilitation.

Adult↗