SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Delphi”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,297 records · Page 72Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Barriers to communication regarding end-of-life care: perspectives of care providers.

OBJECTIVE: Communication regarding end-of-life care is frequently perceived as suboptimal, despite the intent of both health care providers and patients. We interviewed health care providers to determine their perspective regarding these barriers to communication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven focus groups with a total of 10 attending physicians, 24 residents, and 33 nurses were convened to explore barriers to end-of-life discussions on the Internal Medicine service at a 600-bed tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Canada. An interview schedule was designed to elicit information regarding the process of end-of-life discussions, barriers to these discussions, and possible interventions for limiting such barriers. Transcripts were qualitatively analyzed by 6 raters who independently identified "themes." Themes were refined using the Delphi technique and classified under broader "categories." RESULTS: Four main categories of barriers emerged, relating to (1) patients, (2) the health care system, (3) health care providers, and (4) the nature of this dialogue. Attending physicians and residents most frequently identified patient-related factors as barriers to discussions, followed by system, dialogue, and provider barriers (43%, 39%, 10%, and 8%, respectively, for attending physicians; 40%, 34%, 13%, and 13%, respectively, for residents). Nurses similarly identified patient-related and system barriers most frequently, but provider barriers were discussed more often than dialogue barriers (46%, 28%, 22%, and 4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Attending physicians, residents, and nurses perceive the recipients of their care, and the system within which they provide this care, to be the major source of barriers to communication regarding end-of-life care. This finding may impact on the effectiveness of quality-improvement initiatives in end-of-life care.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Structure analysis of the protein transduction domain of human Period1 and its mutant analogs.

Human Period1 (hPer1) has been proved to be able to translocate into cells in a protein transduction manner. The segment of amino acids 830-845 of hPer1 is its protein transduction domain (PTD). In order to explore the membrane penetrating mechanism of hPer1-PTD and the physico-chemical properties necessary in the process, Ala scanning mutation method was used to investigate the variation in the peptide internalization. To further investigate the related physico-chemical requirements, the three dimensional structures of hPer1-PTD and its mutant analogs were simulated by Rosetta method. The electrostatic potentials and energies of these structures were calculated using the Delphi algorithm to solve Poisson-Boltzman equation. The hydrophobicity was assessed by the percentage of the nonpolar area in SAS (solvent accessible surface (SAS)). It has been proved that the Arg836 was the key residue for peptide internalization. When this Arg mutated into Ala, the peptide could not cross the membrane. The large enough area with positive charge was the decisive factor for hPer1-PTD. The alpha-helical structure seemed to play an assistant role so as to enable the positive charge connected in spatial arrangement.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The landscape of caring for women: a narrative study of midwifery practice.

Our purpose was to expand knowledge on the process and outcomes of midwifery care. Narrative analysis was used to interpret stories provided by midwives to illustrate their practice and recipients of midwifery care about their experience. A purposive sample of 14 midwives and four recipients of midwifery care was recruited as a subsample from a prior Delphi study on midwifery practice. Three broad themes were identified: 1) the midwife in relationship with the woman, 2) orchestration of an environment of care, and 3) the outcomes of care, called "life journeys" for the woman and the midwife. The findings are discussed from the perspectives of therapeutic landscapes described in cultural geography and prior research on midwifery practice. The challenge is to confirm the associations between the processes of care identified in these narratives with both short- and long-term outcomes in the health of women and their families. These appear to go well beyond the usual perinatal measures currently used in health care research and hold implications for how care is delivered, measured, and evaluated.

Anecdotes as Topic↗

PubMed2006

SuperState: a computer program for the control of operant behavioral experimentation.

Operant behavioral researches require precise control of experimental devices for delivering stimuli and monitoring behavioral responses. The author developed a software solution named SuperState for controlling hardware devices and running reinforcement schedules. The Microsoft Windows compatible software was written by use of an object-oriented programming language Borland Delphi 5.0, which has simplified the programming of the application. SuperState is a stand-alone easy-to-use green software, without the need for the experimenter to master any scripting languages. It features: (1) control of multiple operant cages running independent reinforcement schedules; (2) enough cage devices (16 digital inputs and 16 digital outputs for each cage) suitable for the need of most operant behavioral equipments; (3) control of most standard ISA-type digital interface cards including Med-Associates Super-port cards and a PCI-type card AC6412, and highly expandable to support other PCI-type interface cards; (4) high-resolution device control (1ms); (5) a built-in real-time cumulative recorder; (6) extensive data analyzing including event recorder, cumulative recorder, block analyzing; the summarized results can be transferred easily to Microsoft Excel spreadsheets through the Clipboard.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Diagnosis of vertebral fractures by vertebral fracture assessment.

Vertebral fractures are independent risk factors for both vertebral and peripheral fractures and only one-third of these fractures come to clinical attention. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is a radiographic method using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess vertebral deformities during bone density measurement. We performed VFA of the spine from T4 to L5 on a Delphi W device (Hologic, Bedford, MA) in 136 postmenopausal patients (69+/-10 yr). These patients also had X-rays of the thoracic and lumbar spine. VFA was independently compared with X-rays by two rheumatologists, for the diagnosis of vertebral fractures at both the patient and vertebral levels. Using X-rays, 61 patients (45%) had at least one vertebral fracture. The percentage of unreadable vertebrae was 1% and 12.4% on X-rays and VFA, respectively (p<0.0001). At the patient level, VFA allowed to diagnose if the patient had no fracture or had at least one fracture in 74% of patients. In 11.2% of cases, VFA misclassified the patients. At the vertebral level, diagnostic efficacy of VFA as compared with X-rays was 97%. Concordance between both observers was good (kappa-score=0.69). We designed an algorithm for decision of performing X-rays in postmenopausal women: Using results of VFA would avoid X-rays in 32% of our patients. VFA is a reliable technique with low radiation, and is easily and rapidly applicable during bone density measurement by DXA, which could improve management of osteoporotic patients.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2006

Assessment of femoral neck strength by 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry.

Hip fractures due to osteoporosis are accompanied with increased mortality and morbidity. Bone mineral density (BMD [g/cm(2)]) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most important risk factor. However, an overlap exists between results of fractured and nonfractured populations. Macro-architectural parameters of the femur are independent risk factors of fracture. They have been evaluated in two dimensions using X-ray films or DXA scans; therefore, they are highly dependent on patient positioning and interindividual anatomical variations. To overcome this problem, we have previously shown the possibility to reconstruct human femurs using two perpendicular DXA scans and to calculate 3-dimensional (3D) geometric parameters from these reconstructions by a method called 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA). The aim of this article is to assess whether the combination of areal BMD and 3D geometric parameters calculated from 3D-XA improves failure load prediction of human proximal femurs in stance phase configuration. Twelve femurs (11 women, 1 man; aged 88+/-9 yr; range: 72-103 yr) were included in this study. The BMD was measured using a Hologic Delphi-W device (Hologic, Waltham, MA) and 3D reconstruction of the femurs was done using two perpendicular DXA scans as previously published. The calculated 3D geometric parameters included femoral neck axis length (FNAL), mid-femoral neck cross-sectional area (mid-FN CSA), neck shaft angle (NSA), and femoral head diameter (FHD). Mechanical testing was performed using stance phase configuration, which resulted in subcapital fractures. The FHD was correlated to mid-FN CSA and FNAL (r=0.68 and 0.76, respectively; p<0.001). Failure load was correlated to age, FHD, NSA, and BMD measurements. Multiple regression analysis showed that femoral neck BMD, FHD, and mid-FN CSA gave the best statistical model for failure load prediction (r(2)=0.84; p<0.002). This is the first study suggesting that combining areal BMD to 3D geometric parameters obtained by 3D-XA improve failure load prediction in human femurs.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2005

The identification and development of Canadian coronary artery bypass graft surgery quality indicators.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to develop quality indicators for coronary artery bypass graft surgery that relate to quality of care, associate with preventable death, and could be reported on performance reports. METHODS: A comprehensive list of quality indicators was collected from quality improvement organizations including the Society For Thoracic Surgery, Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group, and Veteran's Affairs System. Indicators were collated from practice guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association. A MEDLINE search using the keywords "quality indicators" and "coronary bypass" was completed. A 17-member multidisciplinary international expert panel was assembled, who voted using a 2-step Delphi process regarding association with quality of care, risk adjustment, association with preventable death, and inclusion on performance reports. RESULTS: A total of 149 quality indicators were examined. This list was distilled to 33 indicators related to quality of care, 10 indicators that could be adequately risk adjusted, 34 indicators related to preventable death, and 18 indicators to be included on performance reports. These selected indicators consisted of 19 outcome variables, 23 process of care variables, and 4 structure variables. The quality indicators believed to be useful on a Canadian institutional coronary artery bypass graft surgery report card included the following: 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, electrocardiographic myocardial infarction, red cell transfusion, allogeneic blood product transfusion, deep sternal wound infection, postoperative stroke, postoperative dialysis, intensive care unit readmission, intensive care unit length of stay, ventilation time, repeat cardiac operation, repeat surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, repeat revascularization, waiting time to surgery, completion of surgery within a recommended waiting time, use of left internal thoracic artery graft, and institutional volume. CONCLUSIONS: This set of consensus quality indicators can be used as a standard list to be monitored by providers of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in an effort to continuously evaluate and improve their performance.

Canada↗

PubMed2026

Meniscal preservation in the age of biologics: toward a quantitative decision algorithm for personalized repair.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in arthroscopic repair and biologic augmentation, surgical indication for meniscal tears remains heterogeneous. No standardized framework currently integrates biomechanical, clinical, and biological determinants to guide repair versus resection. PURPOSE: To develop a quantitative decision model-the Meniscal Preservation Score (MPS)-that unifies biomechanical and biological evidence to stratify reparability potential and standardize treatment selection in meniscal surgery. METHODS: A systematic evidence synthesis conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 reporting standards of studies published from 2000 to 2025 in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus identified key determinants of meniscal healing. Five consistent predictors-patient age, vascularity, tear morphology, associated pathology, and activity profile-were weighted through a two-round modified Delphi consensus among ten experienced knee surgeons. The resulting 0-9-point MPS was incorporated into a stepwise decision tree linking lesion morphology, biological context, and surgical strategy. Conceptual validation used 50 simulated cases and a retrospective cohort of 45 patients to test agreement between algorithm recommendations and expert surgical decisions. RESULTS: The MPS achieved 86% concordance with expert judgment in simulation and 84% agreement in clinical validation. In this retrospective exploratory cohort, cases in which surgical management was concordant with MPS recommendations demonstrated higher mean IKDC scores at 24 months and lower observed reoperation rates. These findings should be interpreted as associative rather than causal, as treatment allocation was not controlled and discordant cases may have represented inherently more complex pathology. CONCLUSION: The MPS represents an evidence-informed decision-support framework designed to systematize reparability assessment. While exploratory analyses suggest structural coherence with expert reasoning, prospective implementation and external validation are required before clinical adoption as a predictive tool. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: conceptual model with exploratory validation.

Humans↗

PubMed2006

Development of quality indicators for diagnosis and treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a first step toward implementing a multidisciplinary, evidence-based guideline.

BACKGROUND: While developing and distributing clinical practice guidelines are important in optimising clinical healthcare, insight into actual care is necessary to achieve successful implementation. Developing quality indicators may be the first step to becoming aware of actual care. The Dutch national practice guideline Non-small cell lung cancer: staging and treatment is one of the first clinical, multidisciplinary guidelines for oncology in the Netherlands for which quality indicators were developed systematically. We describe indicator development based on this guideline as a practical experience. METHODS: To develop a set of indicators for diagnosis and treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer, we systematically achieved consensus on the basis of a national, multidisciplinary, evidence-based guideline and the opinions of professionals and patients. After the researchers extracted the recommendations from the guideline, we carried out a so-called Rand-modified-Delphi procedure. This consisted of three rounds: a national panel of professionals and representatives of the national patient organization scored all recommendations, the professionals had a consensus meeting, and the final set of indicators was e-mailed for a last check. Subsequently, some clinimetric characteristics of this final set were assessed in a practice test. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 83 recommendations were selected in the first round. After the consensus meeting, 8 recommendations met the final criteria and were incorporated into 15 indicators, which were tested in practice. The most successful indicators for quality improvement are indicators that are measurable, have potential for improvement, have a broad range between practices and are applicable to a large part of the population. CONCLUSIONS: For successful implementation of evidence-based guidelines, each new guideline should be developed and tested with a set of indicators based on the guideline. The procedure we describe can serve as an example for other new guidelines.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗

PubMed2006

Lead contamination of small cetaceans in European waters--the use of stable isotopes for identifying the sources of lead exposure.

Lead concentrations and isotopic composition have been measured in bone and teeth of small cetaceans belonging to three species (Delphinus delphis, Phocoena phocoena and Stenella coeruleoalba), to evaluate the toxicological risk and to determine sources of lead in the European waters. Lead concentrations, far lower than threshold value inducing toxic effects in human, were higher in teeth than in bones, but highly correlated between the two tissues (r=0.92, p<0.001). Large variations of 206Pb/207Pb values in bone tissue showed that cetaceans must be submitted to various atmospheric influences. No geographical differences appeared which is consistent with studies on their distribution indicating seasonal movements between Brittany waters and the Bay of Biscay. The negative correlation between 206Pb/207Pb ratios and age of the individuals reflected the decrease in the production of alkyl lead in Europe, i.e., the increasing use of unleaded gasoline.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Two-dimensional agnor evaluation as a prognostic variable in urinary bladder carcinoma: a different approach via total agnor area/nucleus area per cell.

Traditional criterions are not sufficient to predict accurately the recurrence of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the AgNORs via total AgNOR area/nucleus area (TAA/NA) for each cell as a prognostic parameter, in TCC of urinary bladder. Tumor tissues of 20 consecutive cases of male bladder cancer patients were divided into two groups as middle differentiated (LG) and high grade (HG). The extra-tumoral tissue (ETT) samples of 10 males served as control group. A second control group (HC) consisted of five healthy and normal bladder tissue samples. The 3 microm of sections from each paraffin embedded tumoral, extra-tumoral and normal tissue samples served as patient and control groups. After deparaffinization and rehydratation steps, silver (AgNO(3)) staining of nucleolar organizer regions-associated proteins (AgNORs) was performed. Instead of Giemsa stain, we used Hematoxylin for contra staining. The images of the 100 analyzable nuclei from each tissue sample, transferred by means of a video camera and video capture card from microscope and recorded onto a computer. Software was prepared in Delphi language for analysis. Mean (E+02) TAA/NA values of HC, ETT, LG and HG groups were 6.97+2.80, 5.70+1.82, 7.80+3.22 and 9.24+3.88, respectively. Statistical comparisons have shown significant differences between all groups. In conclusion, mean TAA/NA per cell has a potential to be a prognostic parameter. Therefore, further evaluation of big patient series will be useful.

Antigens, Nuclear↗

PubMed2005

Intraocular pressure-lowering effects of all commonly used glaucoma drugs: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction achieved by the most frequently prescribed glaucoma drugs and a placebo in a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven articles reporting on 28 randomized clinical trials. These articles reported 6953 participants for the trough and 6841 for the peak. METHODS: Articles published up to December 2003 were identified in the following data sources: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and references from relevant articles. Over 85% of the patients had to be diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OH), and articles had to be written in English, German, French, or Dutch. Quality of trials was assessed by a Delphi list with additions. The pooled 1-month IOP-lowering effect from baseline at peak and trough was calculated by performing meta-analysis using the random effects model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Absolute and relative change in IOP from baseline, for peak and trough moments. RESULTS: Relative IOP reductions from baseline [mean (95% confidence interval)] were -23% (-25% to -22%) for a peak and -20% (-23% to -17%) for a trough for 0.5% betaxolol; peak, -27% (-29% to -25%), and trough, -26% (-28% to -25%), for 0.5% timolol; peak, -22% (-24% to -20%), and trough, -17% (-19% to -15%), for 2.0% dorzolamide; peak, -17% (-19% to -15%), and trough, -17% (-19% to -15%) for 1.0% brinzolamide; peak, -25% (-28% to -22%), and trough, -18% (-21% to -14%) for 0.2% brimonidine; peak, -31% (-33% to -29%), and trough, -28% (-30% to -26%) for 0.005% latanoprost; peak, -31% (-32% to -29%), and trough, -29% (-32% to -25%) for 0.004% travoprost; peak, -33% (-35% to -31%), and trough, -28% (-29% to -27%) for 0.03% bimatoprost; and peak, -5% (-9% to -1%), and trough, -5% (-10% to -0%) for the placebo. The difference in absolute IOP reduction from baseline between timolol and prostaglandin analogs or prostamide varied from -0.4 to 0.1 mmHg at trough and from 1.0 to 1.5 mmHg at peak. Quality scores of included studies were generally high, a mean of 14.2 on a scale from 0 to 20 (interquartile range, 13-16). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that bimatoprost, travoprost, latanoprost, and timolol are the most effective intraocular pressure-reducing agents in POAG and OH patients.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

PubMed2004

The effectiveness of physiotherapy and manipulation in patients with tension-type headache: a systematic review.

The study design is a systematic review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs). The objectives of the present study are to assess the effectiveness of physiotherapy and (spinal) manipulation in patients with tension-type headache (TTH). No systematic review exists concerning the effectiveness of physiotherapy and (spinal) manipulation primarily focussing on TTH. Literature was searched using a computerised search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. Only RCTs including physiotherapy and/or (spinal) manipulation used in the treatment of TTH in adults were selected. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of the RCTs using the Delphi-list. A study was considered of high quality if it satisfied at least six points on the methodological quality list. Twelve publications met the inclusion criteria, including three dual or overlapping publications resulting in eight studies included. These studies showed a large variety of interventions, such as chiropractic spinal manipulation, connective tissue manipulation or physiotherapy. Only two studies were considered to be of high quality, but showed inconsistent results. Because of clinical heterogeneity and poor methodological quality in many studies, it appeared to be not possible to draw valid conclusions. Therefore, we conclude that there is insufficient evidence to either support or refute the effectiveness of physiotherapy and (spinal) manipulation in patients with TTH.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2005

A scale for rating the quality of psychological trials for pain.

This paper reports the development of a scale for assessing the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials for psychological treatments. The Delphi method was used in which a panel of 15-12 experts generated statements relating to treatment and design components of trials. After three rounds, statements with high consensus agreement were reviewed by a second expert panel and rewritten as a scale. Evidence to support the reliability and validity of the scale is reported. Three expert and five novice raters assessed sets of 31 and 25 published trials to establish scale reliability (ICC ranges from 0.91 to 0.41 for experts and novices, respectively) and item reliability (Kappa and inter-rater agreement). The total scale score discriminated between trials globally judged as good and poor by experts, and trial quality was shown to be a function of year of publication. Uses for the scale are suggested.

Humans↗

PubMed2006

Development and first validation of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q).

OBJECTIVE: Due to a lack of valid German instruments measuring shared decision-making (SDM), a theory-driven questionnaire (SDM-Q) to measure the process of SDM was developed and validated. METHODS: As a theoretical basis steps of the SDM process were defined in an expert panel. Item formulation was then conducted according to the Delphi method. For the first validation on a mixed sample Rasch analysis was used to eliminate items not fitting the construct thus receiving a unidimensional scale. RESULTS: After eliminating 4 items the remaining 11 form a unidimensional scale with an acceptable reliability for person measures (0.77) and very good reliability for item difficulties (0.95). Analysis of subgroups revealed a different use of items in different conditions. Furthermore the scale showed high ceiling effects. CONCLUSION: A new theory-driven instrument to measure the process of SDM has been developed and validated by use of a rigorous method revealing first promising results. Yet the ceiling effects require the addition of more discriminating items, and the different use of items in different conditions demands an in depth analysis. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: While the concept of SDM is constantly receiving more attention in medical practice, its valid and reliable measurement remains challenging.

Decision Making↗

PubMed2004

Simple aspiration versus chest-tube insertion in the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The initial treatment of a primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) is controversial. Guidelines of the British Thoracic Society recommend simple aspiration for all PSP requiring intervention. The placement of chest tubes is only advocated for patients who fail simple aspiration. However, the American College of Chest Physicians Delphi Consensus Statement found simple aspiration to be rarely appropriate in the management of PSP. AIMS: To compare simple aspiration with chest-tube drainage in the initial management of PSP. METHODS: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). OUTCOME MEASURES: Reductions in duration of hospital stay, recurrence rate and pain or dyspnoea score were classified as benefits, whereas reductions in successful events were classified as risks. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: For dichotomous data, the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. For continuous data, weighted mean differences (WMD) were used. RESULTS: Three RCTs were identified with a combined total of 194 patients. Simple aspiration was associated with shorter hospitalization (WMD -1.30 days [-2.20 to -0.39]). The results for success rate could not be combined because of differences in outcome definitions. However, a pooled result for "success at 1 week or more" showed no significant difference between either intervention (RR 0.86 [0.67, 1.11]). Results of recurrence at 1 year were also not significantly different (RR 0.73 [0.39-1.38]). Different reporting systems for pain scores meant that data could not be pooled. Only one trial reported dyspnoea scores. CONCLUSION: RCT evidence in this field is limited, and the total sample size is too small to make any firm conclusion. On the basis of current available evidence, simple aspiration is advantageous in the initial management of PSP because of shorter hospitalization. There is no significant difference in recurrence at 1 year using either modality, and the efficacy data are inconclusive.

Chest Tubes↗

PubMed2026

Guidance (challenges and priorities) in the assessment of children with low vision: ERN-EYE clinical consensus statement.

Across Europe, children living with low vision often face inconsistent approaches to the assessment of their visual function, leading to delays in diagnosis and unequal access to care. To address this gap, a multidisciplinary group of experts from 8 European countries developed a clinical consensus statement (CCS), using a modified Delphi process. This CCS provides guidance on evaluation of primary visual functions in children with low vision, regardless of etiologies. Assessing visual function can be challenging and cannot be limited to testing visual acuity. It requires a comprehensive approach that takes into account the child's developmental age and necessary adjustments for vision loss. This consensus statement presents different validated tools to evaluate visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual field, and color vision. It provides practical guidance for their use across developmental stages, including infancy and in children with syndromic or neurodevelopmental conditions, and highlights the critical role of caregivers in ensuring reliable assessments. The recommendations emphasize the need for age-appropriate testing strategies, tailored adaptations for low vision and additional impairment, and the importance of early assessment to support timely habilitation and optimize developmental outcomes.

Assessment↗

PubMed2005

The cost of blood: multidisciplinary consensus conference for a standard methodology.

Prior attempts to account for the cost of blood have varied in economic perspective, methodology, and scope and may have underestimated both direct and indirect costs associated with transfusions. To devise a comprehensive and standardized methodology for the United States that will improve upon existing estimates, a panel of experts in blood banking and transfusion medicine was assembled and participated in consensus deliberations using modified Delphi methods. As a first step, a process-flow model that describes all the major steps involved in collecting, processing, and transfusing blood such as donor recruitment and follow-up of transfusion sequelae was constructed. Next, interdependencies were outlined and detailed cost elements within each step were itemized. The relative importance of each element was rated. Personnel, screening for infectious agents, information systems, laboratory evaluations, management of transfusion reactions, and equipment were ranked as the most important factors to capture but, in an effort to be all-inclusive, even minor elements were included. This consensus model is broad-based and should serve societal, provider, and payer perspectives for future cost studies. Recognizing the limitations of process-flow models, the next iteration will use an activity-based approach to more fully account for the cost of blood than present estimates.

Blood Banks↗