SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Workload”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,315 records · Page 73Linked to original sources

PubMed1996

Partitioning of inspiratory muscle workload and pressure assistance in ventilator-dependent COPD patients.

To investigate the mechanisms underlying ventilator-dependence in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and to assess the effects of the combination of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and pressure-support ventilation (PSV) on inspiratory muscle effort, we investigated respiratory mechanics in eight ventilator-dependent COPD patients. The patients' breathing pattern, lung mechanics, diaphragmatic effort (PTPdi), diaphragmatic tension-time index (TTdi), and arterial blood gases were measured during both spontaneous breathing (SB) and ventilatory assistance consisting of PSV alone (15, 20, and 25 cm H2O) and PSV combined with a PEEP of 5 cm H2O (reducing PSV to 10, 15, and 20 cm H2O, respectively, to maintain equivalent inspiratory pressure). The different levels of ventilatory support were delivered in a randomized sequence. Maximal inspiratory (MIP), esophageal (PpImax) and transdiaphragmatic (Pdi(max)) pressures and respiratory drive (P(0.1)) were measured at the beginning of the procedure during SB. We found a high P(0.1) (6.1 +/- 1.7 cm H2O), which seemed to rule out an impairment of respiratory-center output. Apparently, inspiratory muscle strength was compatible with successful weaning (38.5 +/- 8.8, 50.9 +/- 9.7, and 51.8 +/- 9.5 cm H2O for MIP, PPImax and Pdi(max), respectively). However, abnormal respiratory mechanics (particularly an intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) of 8.3 +/- 1.9 cm H2O and pulmonary resistance 24.7 +/- 9.5 cm H2O/L/s imposed an excessive load on the inspiratory muscles, as indicated by a high PTPdi (499 +/- 122 cm H2O x s). Increasing levels of PSV progressively and significantly unloaded the patients' inspiratory muscles, although at pressures above 20 cm H2O uncoupling occurred between patient and ventilator respiratory frequency. Application of PEEP during PSV improved ventilatory assistance by further reducing the inspiratory effort (by 17% on average) and by ameliorating patient-ventilator interaction. We conclude that the excessive mechanical load, and in particular the high PEEPi, is the major determinant of ventilator-dependence in COPD patients. Application of PEEP improves the efficiency of PSV in unloading these patients' inspiratory muscles, and can sometimes improve patient-ventilator interaction.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

Contribution of the endotracheal tube and the upper airway to breathing workload.

The influence of the endotracheal tube (ETT) during a T-piece trial remains controversial. Our aim was to compare the work of breathing of 14 successfully extubated patients at the end of a 2-h trial (T) and after extubation (E) of the trachea, and to assess, using the acoustic reflection method, the resistance of the endotracheal tube and of the supraglottic airway as well as their related work. We found that the work of breathing of the patients was identical between T and E (1.72 +/- 0.59 versus 1.63 +/- 0.45 J/L; p = 0.50 and 23.5 +/- 10.6 versus 22.6 +/- 9.7 J/min; p = 0.70). There was no significant difference between the beginning and the end of the T-piece trial (1.57 +/- 0.53 versus 1.72 +/- 0.59 J/ L, p = 0.10). The work caused by the ETT amounted to 11.0 +/- 3.9% of the total work of breathing. The supraglottic airway resistance was in the normal range and was significantly smaller than the endotracheal tube resistance (0.79 +/- 0.4 versus 1.43 +/- 0.31 cm H2O x s/L; p = 0.008, flow = 0.25 L/s). We conclude that a 2-h trial of spontaneous breathing through an endotracheal tube well mimics the work of breathing performed after extubation, in patients who pass a weaning trial and do not require reintubation.

Acoustics↗

PubMed2000

Compensation for increase in respiratory workload during mechanical ventilation. Pressure-support versus proportional-assist ventilation.

Variation in respiratory impedance may occur in mechanically ventilated patients. During pressure-targeted ventilatory support, this may lead to patient-ventilator asynchrony. We assessed the hypothesis that during pressure-support ventilation (PSV), preservation of minute ventilation (V E) consequent to added mechanical loads would result in an increase in respiratory rate (RR) due to the large reduction in tidal volume (VT). WITH proportional-assist ventilation (PAV), preservation of V E would occur through the preservation of VT, with a smaller effect on RR. We anticipated that this compensatory strategy would result in greater patient comfort and a reduce work of breathing. An increase in respiratory impedance was obtained by chest and abdominal binding in 10 patients during weaning from mechanical ventilation. V E remained constant in both ventilatory modes after chest and abdominal compression. During PSV, this maintenance of VE was obtained through a 58 +/- 3% increase in RR that compensated for a 29 +/- 2% reduction in VT. The magnitudes of the reduction in VT (10 +/- 3%) and of the increase in RR (14 +/- 2%) were smaller (p < 0. 001) during PAV. During both PSV and PAV, chest and abdominal compression caused increases in both the pressure-time product (PTP) of the diaphragm per minute (142.9 +/- 26.9 cm H(2)O. s/min, PSV, and 117.6 +/- 16.4 cm H(2)O. s/min, PAV) and per liter (13.4 +/- 2.5 cm H(2)O. s/L, PSV, and 9.6 +/- 0.7 cm H(2)O. s/L, PAV). These increments were greater (p < 0.001) during PSV than during PAV. The capability of keeping VT and V E constant through increases in inspiratory effort after increases in mechanical loads is relatively preserved only during PAV. The ventilatory response to an added respiratory load during PSV required greater muscle effort than during PAV.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Impact of expiratory trigger setting on delayed cycling and inspiratory muscle workload.

RATIONALE: During pressure-support ventilation, the ventilator cycles into expiration when inspiratory flow decreases to a given percentage of peak inspiratory flow ("expiratory trigger"). In obstructive disease, the slower rise and decrease of inspiratory flow entails delayed cycling, an increase in intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure, and nontriggering breaths. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that setting expiratory trigger at a higher than usual percentage of peak inspiratory flow would attenuate the adverse effects of delayed cycling. METHODS: Ten intubated patients with obstructive disease undergoing pressure support were studied at expiratory trigger settings of 10, 25, 50, and 70% of peak inspiratory flow. MEASUREMENTS: Continuous recording of diaphragmatic EMG activity with surface electrodes, and esophageal and gastric pressures with a dual-balloon nasogastric tube. MAIN RESULTS: Compared with expiratory trigger 10, expiratory trigger 70 reduced the magnitude of delayed cycling (0.25 +/- 0.18 vs. 1.26 +/- 0.72 s, p < 0.05), intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (4.8 +/- 1.9 vs. 6.5 +/- 2.2 cm H(2)O, p < 0.05), nontriggering breaths (2 +/- 3 vs. 9 +/- 5 breaths/min, p < 0.05), and triggering pressure-time product (0.9 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.7 cm H2O . s, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Setting expiratory trigger at a higher percentage of peak inspiratory flow in patients with obstructive disease during pressure support improves patient-ventilator synchrony and reduces inspiratory muscle effort. Further studies should explore whether these effects can influence patient outcome.

Aged↗

PubMed1979