PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Screening programs”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,333 records · Page 74Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Cross-sectional comparison of an automated hybrid capture 2 assay and the consensus GP5+/6+ PCR method in a population-based cervical screening program.

In this cross-sectional study, clinical performances of the hybrid capture 2 assay using an automated instrument (i.e., rapid capture system) (hc2-RCS) and the high-risk human papillomavirus GP5+/6+ PCR-enzyme immunoassay (EIA) test were compared using cervical scrape specimens from 8,132 women that participated in a population-based screening trial. The hc2-RCS test scored significantly more samples positive (6.8%) than the GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA (4.8%) (P < 0.0005). This could be attributed largely to a higher positivity rate by the hc2-RCS test for women with cytologically normal, borderline, or mild dyskaryosis. A receiver operator characteristics analysis of the semiquantitative hc2-RCS results in relation to different cytology categories revealed that these differences are owing to differences in assay thresholds. For women classified as having moderate dyskaryosis or worse who also had underlying histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or cervical cancer (> or =CIN3), the hc2-RCS scored 97% (31/32) of samples positive, versus 91% (29/32) by GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA. However, this difference was not significant (P = 0.25). After increasing the hc2-RCS cutoff from 1.0 to 2.0 relative light units/cutoff value of the HPV16 calibrator (RLU/CO), no additional CIN3 lesions were missed by hc2-RCS, but the number of test-positive women with normal, borderline, or mild dyskaryosis was significantly decreased (P < 0.0005). However, at this RLU/CO, the difference in test positivity between hc2-RCS and the GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA was still significant (P = 0.02). The use of an RLU/CO value of 3.0 revealed no significant difference between hc2-RCS and GP5+/6+ PCR-EIA results, and equal numbers of smears classified as > or =CIN3 (i.e., 29/32) were detected by both methods. In summary, both assays perform very well for the detection of >or =CIN3 in a population-based cervical screening setting. However, adjustment of the hc2-RCS threshold to an RLU/CO value of 2.0 or 3.0 seems to produce an improved balance between the clinical sensitivity and specificity for > or =CIN3 in population-based cervical screening.

Automation↗
PubMed2003

[Hospital-wide vascular screening program at the University Medical Center, Utrecht: prevalence of risk factors and asymptomatic vascular disease from 1996 to 2002].

OBJECTIVE: Tracing and treating cardiovascular risk factors in patients with arterial vascular disease and in patients with high risk of developing vascular diseases. DESIGN: Descriptive. METHOD: In September 1996 at the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, a vascular screening and prevention programme was started for newly referred patients aged between 18 and 79 years presenting with one or more of the following: coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus or lipid disorders. In all patients, risk factors for developing (new) vascular diseases were assessed and non-invasive vascular diagnostics aimed at finding asymptomatic vascular disease were done. RESULTS: Between 1 September 1996 and 31 October 2002, 3075 patients took part in the screening programme. Within the various patient groups and often despite treatment, there was a high prevalence of hypertension, smoking, dyslipidaemia, hyperhomocystemia and overweight. In patients with peripheral artery disease, carotid artery stenosis > or = 50% was detected in 17% and an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta in 5%. In patients presenting with diabetes mellitus, hypertension or lipid disorders the prevalence of asymptomatic arterial disease was 1-5%. Asymptomatic vaso-dilatory disease in particular was uncommon. CONCLUSION: A hospital-wide vascular screening and prevention programme for a wide range of high-risk vascular patients was shown to be feasible and resulted in the detection of risk factors and asymptomatic arterial disease. It is a reliable starting point for actual risk intervention. More attention should be paid to treating existing risk factors.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Experience with a screening program for gestational diabetes].

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of gestational diabetes (GD) in an outpatient clinic in northeastern Mexico. PATIENTS: 732 consecutive pregnant women referred for prenatal care during a two-year period. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME MEASURE: A 100 g glucose tolerance test was performed in the patients with sampling at 1, 2 and 3 hours postchallenge. The patients were classified according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association as normal, abnormal, and a third category of those showing a single abnormal value in the tolerance test. RESULTS: Six percent of the women (44/732) had GD and 1.4% (10/732) had one abnormal value. A comparison group was made with a subset of 44 of the 678 women who showed a normal tolerance test. No group differences were seen in parity, and age, nor in body weight gain or changes in body mass index, the latter measured in the initial and final weeks of pregnancy. Significant differences versus the normal women were seen in the GD group for cesarean births (43% vs 30%) and in macrosomy (25% vs 7%). The group with one abnormal test showed high values in cesareans (50%) and macrosomy (10%) but did not reach significant difference with the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: GD was higher in our study than in the only paper on GD prevalence reported in Mexico (3.9%). The higher incidence of cesareans and macrosomy in GD makes it necessary to consider therapeutic interventions in these cases.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Cancer worry is associated with abnormal prostate-specific antigen levels in men participating in a community screening program.

An accumulating body of research suggests that psychological factors can affect physiological parameters. We assessed the association between the perceived risk of prostate cancer, prostate cancer-specific worry, and cancer-related symptoms and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels or the findings from digital rectal examination (DRE) in a large sample of men undergoing a free prostate cancer screening. Participants (n = 1635) completed a background questionnaire and a questionnaire that assessed their prostate cancer history, screening behavior, perceived risk of prostate cancer, and prostate cancer worry. PSA levels were then determined, and a DRE was conducted. A PSA level of >or=4.0 ng/ml was considered abnormal. The sample size for the multivariate analyses was reduced because of missing data on certain items. Participants who had an abnormal PSA level reported a significantly higher perceived cancer risk (P = 0.02), cancer worry (P = 0.004), and a greater percentage indicated the reason for the current screening was cancer-related symptoms (P = 0.014) than did participants who had normal PSA levels. Multivariate logistic regression analyses controlling for age, past screening behavior, past screening results, and reason for current screening revealed that perceived cancer risk [P = 0.01; odds ratio (OR), 1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-2.1], cancer worry (P = 0.001; OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.7-6.5), and cancer-related symptoms (P = 0.05; OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.1-10.3) remained significantly associated with an abnormal PSA level. When perceived cancer risk, cancer worry, and cancer-related symptoms were entered in the same multivariate analysis, only cancer worry remained in the model. The present findings suggest that prostate cancer-specific worry was associated significantly with an abnormal PSA level.

Adult↗