SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Validity”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,351 records · Page 75Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Psychosocial functioning in the obese before and after weight reduction: construct validity and responsiveness of the Obesity-related Problems scale.

OBJECTIVE: The Obesity-related Problems scale (OP) is a self-assessment module developed to measure the impacts of obesity on psychosocial functioning. Our principal aim was to evaluate the construct validity and responsiveness of the OP scale. Our specific aims were to test: (1). the psychometric performance of OP; (2). if OP scores differed by gender and weight category; (3). if OP scores are inversely related to mental well-being; (4). if weight reduction in the obese is accompanied by improvements in psychosocial functioning (OP). SUBJECTS: Four samples were used: 6863 subjects in the SOS cross-sectional study; 2128 in the SOS intervention study; 1017 nonobese in the SOS reference study; and 3305 obese subjects in the XENDOS study. MEASUREMENTS: Psychosocial functioning was measured by OP. Overall mood was measured by MACL. Anxiety and depression symptoms were measured by HAD. RESULTS: Psychometric testing provided strong support for the construct validity of OP. Factor analysis confirmed the homogeneity of the construct and multitrait/multi-item scaling analysis demonstrated strong item-convergent/discriminant validity. Reliability coefficients were high and floor and ceiling effects were small. Psychometric results were cross-validated and replicated in subgroups by gender, age and body mass index (BMI). As expected, large differences in OP were observed between obese and nonobese (P<0.0001). Obese women reported more weight-related psychosocial problems than obese men (P<0.0001). Psychosocial disturbances (OP) among the obese were significantly related to poor mood (MACL; P<0.0001) and anxiety and depression symptoms (HAD; P<0.0001). Change in OP over time was strongly correlated with weight loss (P<0.0001). A distinct dose-response effect between weight reduction and improvements in OP was demonstrated. Scores on psychosocial functioning (OP) and mental well-being (MACL, HAD) in nonobese (BMI<30) surgical patients at 4-y follow-up were equal to scores observed in nonobese reference subjects (NS). CONCLUSION: OP is a psychometrically valid obesity-specific measure suitable for evaluating HRQL effects of obesity interventions. The negative impact of obesity on psychosocial functioning is considerable and disturbances are connected with poor mental well-being. Weight reduction in the obese is followed by improvements in both psychosocial functioning and mental well-being.

Affect↗

PubMed2005

Validation of [(123)I]beta-CIT SPECT to assess serotonin transporters in vivo in humans: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram.

Disturbances in the serotonin (5-HT) system are associated with various neuropsychiatric disorders. The 5-HT system can be studied in vivo by measuring 5-HT transporter (SERT) densities using (123)iodine-labeled 2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta(4-iodophenyl)tropane ([(123)I]beta-CIT) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Validation of this technique is important because [(123)I]beta-CIT does not bind selectively to SERTs. Some studies have validated this technique in vivo in the human brain in SERT-rich areas, but the technique has not been validated yet in SERT-low cortical areas. The aim of this study was to further validate [(123)I]beta-CIT SPECT in assessing SERTs in vivo in humans in both SERT-rich and SERT-low areas. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design was used with the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram. Six male subjects underwent two [(123)I]beta-CIT SPECT sessions: one after pretreatment with citalopram and one after placebo. Scans were acquired 4 h and 22-27 h p.i., and both region-of-interest and voxel-by-voxel analyses were performed. Citalopram reduced [(123)I]beta-CIT binding ratios in SERT-rich midbrain and (hypo)thalamus. Binding ratios were also lower after citalopram in SERT-low cortical areas, but statistical significance was only reached in several cortical areas using voxel-by-voxel analysis. In addition, citalopram increased binding ratios in the DAT-rich striatum and increased absolute uptake in the cerebellum. The results show that [(123)I]beta-CIT SPECT is a valid technique to study SERT binding in vivo in human brain in SERT-rich areas. Although we provide some evidence that [(123)I]beta-CIT SPECT may be used to measure SERTs in SERT-low cortical areas, these measurements must be interpreted with caution.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Measure for measure: the quest for valid indicators of non-fatal injury incidence.

In this edition of Public Health, McClure and colleagues report on research that considered the criterion validity of indicators based on serious long bone fracture and length of stay in hospital. They found that neither were sensitive or specific indicators for serious injury as defined by an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 16 or more. They contend that their study findings ' em leader strongly support a return to a measure similar in intent to that encapsulated in the original UK Green Paper em leader '. We contend that their analysis does not provide any empirical evidence to support their view that there should be a return to the Green Paper: Our Healthier Nation indicator. Furthermore, we consider the analyses that they carry out to validate both the Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation and the serious long bone fracture indicators are flawed. We agree that national (or state) indicators are very influential. They encourage preventive action and resource use aimed at producing favourable changes to these indicators. However, each of the four non-fatal indicators considered in their analysis have problems. Formal validation of existing indicators is necessary and the following aspects of validity should be addressed: face; criterion; consistency; and completeness and accuracy of the source date. Taking into account the current national data systems in England, possible options for one or more national non-fatal unintentional injury indicators have been proposed in our paper. Furthermore, the International Collaborative Effort on Injury Statistics (ICE) Injury Indicators Group is about to embark on the development of a strategic framework for the development of valid indicators of non-fatal injury occurrence.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗

PubMed2004

Review of ozone and temperature lidar validations performed within the framework of the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change.

The use of assimilation tools for satellite validation requires true estimates of the accuracy of the reference data. Since its inception, the Network for Detection of Stratospheric Change (NDSC) has provided systematic lidar measurements of ozone and temperature at several places around the world that are well adapted for satellite validations. Regular exercises have been organised to ensure the data quality at each individual site. These exercises can be separated into three categories: large scale intercomparisons using multiple instruments, including a mobile lidar; using satellite observations as a geographic transfer standards to compare measurements at different sites; and comparative investigations of the analysis software. NDSC is a research network, so each system has its own history, design, and analysis, and has participated differently in validation campaigns. There are still some technological differences that may explain different accuracies. However, the comparison campaigns performed over the last decade have always proved to be very helpful in improving the measurements. To date, more efforts have been devoted to characterising ozone measurements than to temperature observations. The synthesis of the published works shows that the network can potentially be considered as homogeneous within +/-2% between 20-35 km for ozone and +/-1 K between 35-60 km for temperature. Outside this altitude range, larger biases are reported and more efforts are required. In the lower stratosphere, Raman channels seem to improve comparisons but such capabilities were not systematically compared. At the top of the profiles, more investigations on analysis methodologies are still probably needed. SAGE II and GOMOS appear to be excellent tools for future ozone lidar validations but need to be better coordinated and take more advantage of assimilation tools. Also, temperature validations face major difficulties caused by atmospheric tides and therefore require intercomparisons with the mobile systems, at all sites.

Air Pollutants↗

PubMed1995

Validity of parent report measures of vocabulary development for children with Down syndrome.

This study investigated the validity of a parent report measure of vocabulary development, the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Words and Sentences (CDI), in children with and without developmental disabilities. Concurrent validity was examined by comparing results from the CDI and laboratory measures of vocabulary in 44 children with Down syndrome and 46 typically developing children with mental ages from 12 to 27 months. Significant correlations between .70 and .82 were obtained. Predictive validity was examined by measuring the vocabulary of 20 children with Down syndrome and 23 typically developing children first at approximately 20 months mental age and later at a mental age of approximately 28 months. Significant correlations were obtained between the CDI at Time A and all but one of the vocabulary measures at Time B (r = .46 to .66). These results establish the validity of parent measures of vocabulary development for children with Down syndrome and confirm their validity for typically developing children.

Child↗

PubMed1998

Community validation of the United Kingdom diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis in Romanian schoolchildren.

Although the U.K. modification of Hanifin and Rajka's diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis (AD) for use in epidemiological studies has demonstrated good validity and repeatability when previously tested in a U.K. community setting, little is known about its performance in other countries where different cultural, educational and linguistic factors could impair validity. We used a questionnaire to test the validity of the U.K. criteria as a point prevalence measure of AD in 1114 Romanian schoolchildren aged 6-12 years against the clinical diagnosis of a dermatologist with an interest in AD, who was unaware of the questionnaire content and responses. The sensitivity and specificity of the U.K. criteria for AD in this setting was 74% and 99%, respectively, an improvement rather than a deterioration in validity when compared with the previous U.K. study. Test-retest repeatability for all of the questions pertaining to the U.K. criteria using the chance-corrected kappa statistic was high, with values of 0.72 and over. The positive predictive value of the criteria was lower than in the U.K. study (63% compared with 80%, respectively) due to the very low prevalence of AD in this study (2.4%). The validity of a parental report of 'eczema' was poor, with a sensitivity of 22%, specificity of 97% and positive predictive value of 18%. This study suggests that the U.K. criteria perform well in settings outside the U.K., although care has to be taken when using the criteria to ascertain cases in settings where the prevalence of AD is very low.

Child↗

PubMed1998

The influence of cultural and educational factors on the validity of symptom and diagnosis questions for atopic eczema.

Valid questions for atopic eczema are necessary to identify risk factors in epidemiological studies. We have examined the influence of cultural and educational factors on the validity of some questions on atopic eczema used in the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood by using data from a cross-sectional study on 1511 children aged 6 years from East and West Germany. We tested three questions in relation to a point prevalence of atopic eczema as recorded by a dermatologist: (i) has a physician ever diagnosed eczema in your child? (ii) Has your child ever had an itchy rash which came and went for at least 6 months? (iii) Has your child ever had 'neurodermatitis' (atopic eczema, endogenous eczema)? The point prevalence of atopic eczema on the day of investigation was 11.1% (134 of 1217). According to the questionnaire, 15.7% of the children had had physician-diagnosed eczema, 14.1% had had neurodermatitis and 11.3% had had an itchy rash for > 6 months. Fifty-one per cent of parents who had a child with atopic eczema on the day of investigation said that their child had had an itchy rash which came and went for at least 6 months. This sensitivity value is less than that found in another community survey conducted in the U.K., suggesting that the German wording of the question seems to mean something more severe to the parents than the English one. The education of the parents had an influence on the validity of the three questions: parents with < 10 years of schooling often answered symptom and diagnosis questions less positively. Parents with academic degrees, contrary to expectation, did not answer most precisely, this being especially true for the symptom questions. The association between symptom questions and clinical diagnosis was higher in West than in East Germany. We compared lifetime eczema symptoms and diagnosis with a point prevalence clinical diagnosis. In the absence of knowledge of how extraneous factors measured in this paper can affect diseases chronicity, it is difficult to say with certainty that such factors affect the validity of symptom and diagnosis questions on atopic eczema. Our study suggests that more studies are needed to examine the influence of social class, education and location on the validity of symptom questionnaires for atopic eczema. Until then, we recommend that information about such variables should be gathered routinely.

Child↗

PubMed1998

Embracing ambiguities and valuing ourselves: issues of validity in action research.

Further elucidation is required on the validity of action research. The tendency of nurse action researchers to rely on perspectives of validity from qualitative or ethnographic research only gives a partial picture. Three categories of validity regarding action research are proposed in order to develop understandings and to stimulate debate: dialectical, critical and reflexive. Tensions and processes, moral responsibilities, reflexivity and accounts of action research are discussed to illuminate the validity of action research. The complexity and contradictions inherent even when attempting to demonstrate its validity are highlighted and illustrated with reference to examples of action research.

England↗

PubMed2003

Praiseworthy pragmatism? Validity and action research.

BACKGROUND: Action research has been promoted as a suitable methodology for nursing, but is located in a discourse that challenges its claims of validity. This discourse, influenced by positivism, is similar to that which qualitative researchers have faced. AIM: This article contributes to theoretical discussion of the validity of action research. FINDINGS: Because of similarities, the emergent debates around the reconceptualization of validity in qualitative research are outlined, prior to a consideration of the relative arguments in relation to action research. Three avenues of thought are discerned: that no criteria are required; that parallels with other schools are appropriate; and that new concepts specific to one school of thought should be developed. CONCLUSIONS: Because of its ethical and action-oriented principles, action research offers the potential to address validity issues that remain problematic to 'pure' qualitative researchers, and it can be claimed that its pragmatic approach is validity-enhancing. We argue for the rejection of naïve rule-based formulae and for recognition of the impact of contextual and pragmatic concerns, so that the potential for the added value of action research might be realized.

Data Collection↗

PubMed2000

Reported snoring--does validity differ by age?

Snoring is a major sign of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Despite the frequent number of studies based on subjective reports of snoring, self-reported snoring has hardly been validated at all. In some previous epidemiological studies, a significant association between snoring and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was found only below the age of 50-60 y. This study was performed to investigate whether this is due to a decrease in the validity of reported snoring with increasing age. In a population-based study, 2668 men aged 40-79 y answered a questionnaire including questions on snoring. Those who reported loud and disturbing snoring often or very often were regarded as habitual snorers. Without taking account of reported snoring, an age-stratified sample of these men was selected and their snoring was measured using a microphone for 1 night. Significant snoring was defined as recorded snoring sounds for >/= 10% of the night. The participants were divided into younger (age 40-59, mean +/- SD: 51.8 +/- 4.6 y, n=132) and older (age 60-79, 67.7 +/- 5.4 y, n=99) age groups. When analysing the validity of reported snoring, no significant differences were found between the younger and older age groups in terms of specificity [younger: 82% (95% CI 74-90%), older: 88% (81-95%)] or sensitivity [younger: 40% (26-54%), older: 35% (17-53%)]. These data indicate that, in men aged 40-79 y, the validity of reported snoring is similar in different age groups. The lack of an association between reported snoring and cardiovascular disease at higher ages can, therefore, not be explained by a decrease in the validity of reported snoring.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2000

Economic evaluation of parasitic diseases: a critique of the internal and external validity of published studies.

It was estimated that in 1990, major parasitic diseases accounted for 11.7% of the disease burden from communicable disease. As advances in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of parasitic diseases are made and implemented, there is a growing economic literature to help decision-makers choose the most efficient control method. The aim of this paper is to identify, describe and analyse the available published data on the efficiency of control strategies against parasitic diseases. Internal validity is assessed through the quality of economic evaluations over time using a series of standard questions, and external validity is assessed in terms of the potential to extrapolate results to other settings. This leads to a discussion of the legitimacy and feasibility of pooling data or results from studies for priority setting in the health sector, resulting in three recommendations: to increase the coverage of economic evaluations for parasitic diseases and types of interventions; to improve the internal validity of studies through guidelines and review procedures; and to explore the external validity of research results by examining their predictive validity across settings.

Child↗

PubMed1999

Amphetamine withdrawal: I. Reliability, validity and factor structure of a measure.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to create a short, reliable and valid questionnaire for the evaluation of amphetamine withdrawal, which we shall call the Amphetamine Withdrawal Questionnaire (AWQ). METHOD: Items of the AWQ included in this study were based on the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) and a comprehensive review. A field trial for assessing the reliability, validity and factor structure was conducted in outpatients and inpatients with amphetamine withdrawal. RESULTS: Thirty and 102 patients' data were included in the reliability-validity tests and the factor study, respectively. Due to the very low mean score of insomnia item, this item was excluded from subsequent analyses. The AWQ internal consistency was satisfactory with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.77. For test-retest reliability, a Spearman rank order correlation coefficient of the AWQ total score was 0.79. The AWQ total score for criterion validity was moderately correlated with the other two accepted measures. Principal component analysis, eigenvalue-one test and a varimax rotation performed to elicit the factors of AWQ yielded a three-factor model of AWQ: namely hyperarousal, reversed vegetative and anxiety factors. CONCLUSIONS: The AWQ is a short, reliable and valid measure for assessing amphetamine withdrawal symptoms. Further studies with a larger number of patients should be conducted to confirm the results of this factor analysis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness of a disease-specific symptom questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

The purpose of this study was to establish the reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness of a symptom questionnaire to assess patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A total of 300 patients with GERD completed questionnaires before and 6 months after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Forty-six GERD patients who continued on omeprazole served as controls. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure, 24-h pH, and quality of life (SF36) were measured at baseline and follow-up. Reproducibility was calculated as an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from a repeated-measures analysis of variance on symptom scores (SS) on two consecutive days. Validity was established by correlating SS with 24-h pH and SF36 scores. Responsiveness was calculated as the the ratio of the mean paired difference in score in the surgical group to the within-subject variability in control subjects. Reproducibility was very high, as revealed by an ICC of 0.92. Strong correlations between SS and SF36 scores at baseline and after surgery demonstrated high cross-sectional validity. Correlation between change in SS and change in pH, SF36 pain, general health, and physical health scores demonstrated longitudinal validity. The mean (95% confidence interval) paired differences in SS were 25.6 (23.7, 27.5) in the study and 2.0 (-3.2, 7.3) in the control groups, and the responsive index was 1.0. The estimated minimally important clinical difference was 7. We conclude that the symptom score is a reproducible, valid, and responsive instrument for assessing symptoms caused by GERD.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗

PubMed2003

Validating the Derbyshire Children's Hospital Pain Tool: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The Derbyshire Children's Hospital Paediatric Pain Chart (DPC) is the current pain assessment tool used at the Derbyshire Children's Hospital. It was originally devised as a simple pain tool for use in the clinical area, and it is applicable for use in children of all ages within the postoperative setting. The pain assessment chart encompasses pain assessment by utilizing facial expression, body movement and verbal expression. An exploratory study was performed to define its reliability and validity. METHODS: The research nurse (V.P.) assessed 40 children aged 1-5 undergoing minor and intermediate surgery comparing the Toddler Preschooler Postoperative Pain Scale and the DPC. Assessments were performed preoperatively and for 4 h postoperatively. Any analgesia administered postoperatively was recorded. RESULTS: All the children scored 0 preoperatively with both pain scales, thus demonstrating known groups validity. There were 116 dual assessments by the research nurse using both pain scales. There was a strong correlation (r = 0.89) demonstrating convergent validity. There was a significant correlation between 182 joint assessments by the research nurse (V.P.) and the nursing staff using the DPC (Spearmans rank correlation, 0.81) and the Cronbach alpha coefficient ranged from 0.83 to 0.98. Construct validity was demonstrated by a fall in the mean pain scores from 1.8 to 0.1 following analgesia in 19 children. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study suggests the DPC holds construct, convergent and known groups validity and is a reliable pain assessment tool for children aged 1-5 years undergoing minor and intermediate surgery.

Child, Preschool↗

PubMed2002

Validity and reliability of an interviewer-administered questionnaire to measure the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms of storage abnormality: the Leicester Urinary Symptom Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a valid and reliable interviewer-administered questionnaire to measure the presence and severity of storage abnormality symptoms of incontinence, urgency, frequency and nocturia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Subjects were 930 men and women aged >/=40 years, taking part in a randomized controlled trial of a continence nurse practitioner (CNP) service. Criterion validity was tested by comparing questionnaire responses to 24-h pad test and 3-day urinary diary. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing questionnaire responses before and after treatment. Questions about urgency were investigated for construct validity in patients taking part in the trial who underwent urodynamic investigation (243). Test-retest and inter-rater reliability was measured at approximately 6 days in subjects recruited to an associated epidemiological study (104 and 102, respectively). RESULTS: The questionnaire responses showed significant associations with pad-test and diary measures. Questions about the severity of daytime incontinence performed better than those measuring night-time incontinence. The response categories of soaked, wet, damp and almost dry had better associations with the pad test than other measures of the severity of incontinence. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability was good for all questions, and all were responsive to change in symptoms, showing significant differences before and after treatment. CONCLUSION: There is a clear need for standardization of measurement using well-validated instruments. This interviewer-administered questionnaire is valid, reliable and sensitive to change in a wide range of severity of symptoms, and in both men and women aged >/=40 years. The questionnaire provides a useful assessment tool for primary and secondary care in research and clinical settings.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Development and validation of the Headache Needs Assessment (HANA) survey.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a brief survey of migraine-related quality-of-life issues. The Headache Needs Assessment (HANA) questionnaire was designed to assess two dimensions of the chronic impact of migraine (frequency and bothersomeness). METHODS: Seven issues related to living with migraine were posed as ratings of frequency and bothersomeness. Validation studies were performed in a Web-based survey, a clinical trial responsiveness population, and a retest reliability population. Headache characteristics (eg, frequency, severity, and treatment), demographic information, and the Headache Disability Inventory were used for external validation. RESULTS: The HANA was completed in full by 994 adults in the Web survey, with a mean total score of 77.98 +/- 40.49 (range, 7 to 175). There were no floor or ceiling effects. The HANA met the standards for validity with internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alpha =.92, eigenvalue for the single factor = 4.8, and test-retest reliability = 0.77). External validity showed a high correlation between HANA and Headache Disability Inventory total scores (0.73, P<.0001), and high correlations with disease and treatment characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the psychometric properties of the HANA. The brief questionnaire may be a useful screening tool to evaluate the impact of migraine on individuals. The two-dimensional approach to patient-reported quality of life allows individuals to weight the impact of both frequency and bothersomeness of chronic migraines on multiple aspects of daily life.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2003

Reliability and validity of the Japanese Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and validity of a Japanese translation of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire in a sample of Japanese patients with headache. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that the English-language version of the MIDAS Questionnaire is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of migraine-related disability. Any translations of the MIDAS Questionnaire must also be assessed for reliability and validity. METHODS: Study participants were recruited from the patient population attending either the Neurology Department of Kitasato University or an affiliated clinic. Participants were eligible for study entry if they had 6 or more primary headaches per year. For reliability testing, participants completed the MIDAS Questionnaire on 2 occasions, exactly 2 weeks apart. To assess validity, patients were also invited to participate in a 90-day daily diary study. Composite measures from the 90-day diaries were compared to equivalent MIDAS measures (ie, 5 questions on headache-related disability and 1 question each on average pain intensity and headache frequency in the last 3 months) and to the total MIDAS score obtained from a third MIDAS Questionnaire completed at the end of this 90-day period. RESULTS: One hundred one patients between the ages of 21 and 77 years were recruited (81 women and 20 men). Ninety-nine patients (80 women and 19 men) participated in the diary study. At baseline, 46.5% of patients were MIDAS grade I or II (minimal, mild, or infrequent disability), 22.2% were MIDAS grade III (moderate disability), and 31.3% were MIDAS grade IV (severe disability). Test-retest Spearman correlations for the 5 disability questions and the questions on average pain intensity and headache frequency ranged from 0.59 to 0.80 (P<.0001). The test-retest Spearman correlation coefficient for the total MIDAS score was 0.83 (P<.0001). The degree to which individual MIDAS questions correlated with the diary-based measures ranged from 0.36 to 0.88. The correlation between the total MIDAS score and the equivalent diary-based measure was 0.66. In general, the mean and median values for the MIDAS items and total MIDAS score were similar to the means and medians for the diary-based measures. However, the mean MIDAS scores for the number of days on which headache was experienced and the number of missed workdays were significantly different compared to the diary-based estimates for these items (P<.05). In addition, the mean MIDAS score for the number of days of missed housework was significantly higher than the corresponding diary-based estimate (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study show that the Japanese translation of the MIDAS Questionnaire is comparable with the English-language version in terms of reliability and validity.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Simultaneous validation of ten physical activity questionnaires in older men: a doubly labeled water study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to simultaneously validate 10 physical activity (PA) questionnaires in a homogenous population of healthy elderly men against the reference method: doubly labeled water (DLW). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Community-based sample from Lyon, France. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen healthy old men (age 73.4 +/- 4.1 years), recruited from various associations for elderly people in Lyon, agreed to participate in the study. MEASUREMENTS: The questionnaire-derived measures (scores) were compared with two validation measures: DLW and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). With the DLW method three parameters were calculated: (1) total energy expenditure (TEE), (2) physical activity level (PAL), i.e., the ratio of TEE to resting metabolic rate, (3) energy expenditure of PA. RESULTS: Relative validity. Correlation between the questionnaires and TEE ranged from 0.11 for the Yale Physical Activity Survey (YPAS) total index to 0.63 for the Stanford usual activity questionnaire. This questionnaire also gave the best correlation coefficients with PAL (0.75), and with VO2max (0.62). Significant results with TEE measured by the DLW method were also obtained for college alumni sports score, Seven Day Recall moderate activity, and Questionnaire d'Activité Physique Saint-Etienne sports activity (r = 0.54, r = 0.52, and r = 0.54, respectively). Absolute validity. No difference was found between PA measured by the Seven Day Recall or by the YPAS and DLW, on a group basis. The limits of agreement were wide for all the questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Only a few questionnaires demonstrated a reasonable degree of reliability and could be used to rank healthy older men according to PA. Correlation coefficients were best when the Stanford Usual Activity Questionnaire was compared with all the validation measures. The two questionnaires reporting recent PA, the Seven Day Recall, and YPAS accurately assessed energy expenditure for the group. The individual variability was high for all the questionnaires, suggesting that their use as a proxy measure of individual energy expenditure may be limited.

Activities of Daily Living↗