PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DIAGNOSIS, LABORATORY”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,369 records · Page 76Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infections in adult patients.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections and account for a significant part of the workload in clinical microbiology laboratories. Enteric bacteria (in particular, Escherichia coli) remain the most frequent cause of UTIs, although the distribution of pathogens that cause UTIs is changing. More important is the increase in resistance to some antimicrobial agents, particularly the resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole seen in E. coli. Physicians distinguish UTIs from other diseases that have similar clinical presentations with use of a small number of tests, none of which, if used individually, have adequate sensitivity and specificity. Among the diagnostic tests, urinalysis is useful mainly for excluding bacteriuria. Urine culture may not be necessary as part of the evaluation of outpatients with uncomplicated UTIs, but it is necessary for outpatients who have recurrent UTIs, experience treatment failures, or have complicated UTIs, as well as for inpatients who develop UTIs.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

ACP Best Practice No 167: the laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infection.

Urinary tract infection is common, and it is not surprising that urine specimens make up a large proportion of those samples submitted to the routine diagnostic laboratory. Many of these specimens will show no evidence of infection and several methods can be used to screen out negative samples. Those that grow bacteria need to be carefully assessed to quantify the degree of bacteriuria and hence clinical relevance. To influence treatment, a final report should be produced within 24 hours of specimen receipt, with turnaround times continuously monitored. Much work needs to be done to determine the cost effectiveness involved in processing urine specimens and the evidence base for the final report provided.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Laboratory diagnosis of auto-immune hemolytic anemia: characteristics of the manual direct test of Polybrene].

UNLABELLED: The direct manual Polybrene test (DPT) and the direct antiglobulin tests (DAT) were employed to detect antibody sensitizing red blood cell (RCB) in patients with clinical and laboratorial findings of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of DPT and DAT in the diagnosis of AIHA. METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients with diagnosis of AIHA were evaluated. The control group consisted of 20 normal volunteers blood donors and 20 patients with sickle cell anemia. All patients and controls were submitted to DPT and DAT. All DAT positive samples were further tested using monospecific reagents (anti-IgG heavy chain and anti-C3d). Positive samples for either DPT or DAT were evaluated by eluate technique using. The dichloromethane (DCM). RESULTS: The DAT was positive in 14 patients and negative in 4 subjects, while the DPT was positive in 17 patients and negative in 1 individual who had a positive DAT owing to complement (C3d). All positive eluates performed with DCM showed RBC autoantibodies with presumed "anti-Rh" specificity. The sensitivity rate of the DPT (94%) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the sensitivity rate of DAT (78%) to determine whether IgG was bound in vivo, but no difference was found regarding the specificity of the two tests. CONCLUSION: 1) The DPT is more sensitive than the DAT in detecting IgG autoantibody on the RBCs of patients with AIHA; 2) because of its simplicity and rapidity, the DPT is a useful additional screening test for the investigation of Coombs-negative AIHA.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial infections.

This paper reviews the recent US history of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and discusses the emergence of drug-resistant strains. The paper continues with brief discussions of the clinical presentation of tuberculosis, tuberculosis in the pediatric population, and nontuberculous pulmonary disease. We discuss laboratory techniques that will rapidly identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis and provide susceptibility test results. The advances and limitations of currently available diagnostic techniques are presented. The chapter concludes with an explanation of the current strengths and limitations of molecular diagnosis of disease and resistance.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗