SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Guidelines”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,387 records · Page 77Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Adherence to postacute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if compliance with poststroke rehabilitation guidelines was associated with better functional outcomes. METHODS: An inception cohort of 288 stroke patients in 11 Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Centers hospitalized between January 1998 and March 1999 were followed prospectively for 6 months. Data were abstracted from medical records and telephone interviews. The primary study outcome was the Functional Independence Motor Score (FIM). Secondary outcomes included Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), SF-36 physical functioning, and the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). Acute and postacute rehabilitation guideline compliance scores (range 0 to 100) were derived from an algorithm. All outcomes were adjusted for case-mix. RESULTS: Average compliance scores in acute and postacute care settings were 68.2% (SD 14) and 69.5% (SD 14.4), respectively. After case-mix adjustment, level of compliance with postacute rehabilitation guidelines was significantly associated with FIM motor, IADL, and the SIS physical domain scores. SF-36 physical function was not associated with guideline compliance. Level of compliance with rehabilitation guidelines in acute settings was unrelated to any of the outcome measures. CONCLUSION: Greater levels of adherence to postacute stroke rehabilitation guidelines were associated with improved patient outcomes. Compliance with guidelines may be viewed as a quality-of-care indicator with which to evaluate new organizational and funding changes involving postacute stroke rehabilitation.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2004

Physician opinions on the implementation of the SIGN guideline for heart failure.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To assess physician opinion of and attitudes to, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) guideline for chronic heart failure (CHF) due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: A questionnaire examining physicians' attitudes and their use of the SIGN guideline for CHF was distributed to 158 physicians in two teaching hospitals within one NHS trust. 65% of recipients responded. More cardiologists had read the guideline compared to non-cardiologists (91 vs 56%, p < 0.05). The majority of cardiologists and non-cardiologists agreed that it was applicable to their patients (92 vs 79%, p > 0.1) and that implementation may reduce hospital admissions (65 vs 59%, p > 0.5). In general, compliance was thought to be a problem in only a minority of patients in both groups for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (8 vs 19%), diuretics (12 vs 29%) and digoxin (17 vs 19%, all p > 0.1). Beta-blocker compliance was identified as a problem by both groups (50 vs 53%, P > 0.5) while fewer cardiologists reported compliance as a problem with spironolactone (4 vs 25%, p < 0.05). More cardiologists felt that there was a need for a community based CHF nurse specialist (100 vs 57%, p < 0.001), and that this strategy would reduce hospital admissions (92 vs 57%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist between cardiologist and non-cardiologist physicians' awareness of the SIGN guideline for CHE. Furthermore, we have shown differences in reported implementation of the guideline and perceived difficulties with specific drug therapies. This is in spite of high levels of agreement in both groups with the treatment suggested by the guideline and the anticipated benefits resulting from its implementation.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Toward targeted hypertension screening guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for screening and subsequent treatment of hypertension vary widely between countries. Part of this variation can be attributed to systematic differences between populations, but little is known about the way in which guidelines should be targeted to the population of interest. Optimal guidelines should have high yield and low complexity. The goal is to fit procedures for screening and subsequent treatment of hypertension optimally to a specific population. METHODS: Simulation study on individual cardiovascular risk profiles, with drug treatment altering the 10-year cardiovascular risk. The analysis compares the consequences of various screening and treatment alternatives. The reference scenario consists of the Dutch hypertension guidelines for primary care. A representative sample of the Dutch population aged 20 years and older is taken as the target. Main outcome measures include incidence, quality-adjusted life years won, number needed to screen, and costs (prevention, morbidity, and mortality). The discount rate is 4%. RESULTS: Strict adherence to the current hypertension guidelines saves costs (i.e., the total prevention costs are less than the costs of prevented morbidity and mortality). The following changes increase its cost-effectiveness: use of lower blood pressure levels for screening and treatment, reduction of the number of screens from 5 to 3, and active call-up of high-risk patients. The adherence to guidelines has a large influence on actual cost-effectiveness achieved in practice. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate targeting of hypertension guidelines to a population and critical appraisal of the entire screening procedure can enhance cost-effectiveness.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Implementation of acute myocardial infarction guidelines in community hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: To obtain information regarding the current use of guidelines and protocols and quality assessment practices for the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Minnesota hospitals without cardiac catheterization laboratories. METHODS: Structured surveys were mailed in 2003 to emergency department medical directors or nurse managers in 111 hospitals in Minnesota that did not have cardiac catheterization laboratories. Of the 111 hospitals surveyed, 104 (94%) responded. RESULTS: Sixty-three percent of responding hospitals have guidelines or protocols; 57% use standing orders for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Thirty-three percent have neither. Of those with guidelines, protocols, or standing orders, 8% address triage and transfer criteria, 86% thrombolytics, 91% aspirin, and 71% beta-blockers. Fifty percent have quality assessment processes in place for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations from the National Heart Attack Alert Program issued more than ten years ago and, more recently, the updated American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction suggest development of emergency department and hospital-specific guidelines and protocols for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Currently, only two thirds of community hospitals in Minnesota have these in place; when present, these guidelines are often incomplete and rarely address transfer criteria to hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention capability. Quality assessment occurred in 50% of hospitals surveyed. Programs to help community hospitals develop and implement guidelines and quality improvement should be encouraged and supported.

Cardiac Catheterization↗

PubMed2004

VA QUERI informatics paper: information technology for clinical guideline implementation: perceptions of multidisciplinary stakeholders.

OBJECTIVE: This multisite study compared the perceptions of three stakeholder groups regarding information technologies as barriers to and facilitators of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). DESIGN: The study settings were 18 U.S. Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. A purposive sample of 322 individuals participated in 50 focus groups segmented by profession and included administrators, physicians, and nurses. Focus group participants were selected based on their knowledge of practice guidelines and involvement in facility-wide guideline implementation. MEASUREMENTS: Descriptive content analysis of 1,500 pages of focus group transcripts. RESULTS: Eighteen themes clustered into four domains. Stakeholders were similar in discussing themes in the computer function domain most frequently but divergent in other domains, with workplace factors more often discussed by administrators, system design issues discussed most by nurses, and personal concerns discussed by physicians and nurses. Physicians and nurses most often discussed barriers, whereas administrators focused most often on facilitation. Facilitators included guideline maintenance and charting formats. Barriers included resources, attitudes, time and workload, computer glitches, computer complaints, data retrieval, and order entry. Themes with dual designations included documentation, patient records, decision support, performance evaluation, CPG implementation, computer literacy, essential data, and computer accessibility. CONCLUSION: Stakeholders share many concerns regarding the relationships between information technologies and clinical guideline use. However, administrators, physicians, and nurses hold different opinions about specific facilitators and barriers. Health professionals' disparate perceptions could undermine guideline initiatives. Implementation plans should specifically incorporate actions to address these barriers and enhance the facilitative aspects of information technologies in clinical practice guideline use.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practice guidelines and critical pathways.

PURPOSE: We describe the impact of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on improvement in oncology treatment processes or outcomes. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of the literature from 1966 to the present and a directed review of the literature. RESULTS: Improvements have been demonstrated in compliance with evidence-based guidelines or evidence-based medicine, and in short-term length of stay, complication rates, and financial outcomes. The data suggest that patient satisfaction can be maintained despite a shorter length of stay. There has been one example of province-wide improvement in disease-free and overall survival of breast cancer patients coincident with the adoption of CPGS: The components of successful guidelines can be summarized as follows: (1) development is based on evidence, with the guideline formulated by key physicians in the group; (2) the guidelines are disseminated to all affected health care professionals for critique; (3) implementation includes direct feedback on performance to physicians or general feedback on system performance; and (4) there is accountability for performance according to the guidelines. This accountability can consist of voluntary peer pressure to conform to evidence-based medicine, and it does not require a financial reward or penalty. CONCLUSION: Some attempts to improve practice have been moderately successful in achievement of reduced health care costs, reduced hospital length of stay, and possibly improved outcomes. Other methods that are still in use have been demonstrated to have little effect. Programs that have not succeeded have relied on voluntary change in practice behavior without incentives to change or have had no accountability component. Further research is needed to assess how guidelines are enacted in organizations other than those demonstrably committed to improvement, ways to improve compliance of health care providers who are not committed to change, and methods to improve accountability.

Critical Pathways↗

PubMed2003

General practitioners' uptake of clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To explain recent rapid audited change in the uptake of locally implemented, evidence-based clinical guidelines for asthma and angina in primary care. METHODS: A case study of primary care in two matched, adjacent districts in Northern England, focusing on a stratified random sample of 49 general practitioners (GPs) from eight primary care groups. Data were collected from three cycles of mainly qualitative interviews carried out at six-monthly intervals, before and after the dissemination of local guidelines and after audit data were gathered. Interviews examined attitudes, awareness and impact of locally disseminated asthma and angina guidelines and the subsequent audit. Audit data on guideline uptake were also available from a parallel study. RESULTS: The rapid increase in guideline uptake observed in both intervention and control groups was not explained by individual practitioners or practice factors. The findings are attributed to GPs' awareness of policies for evidence-based medicine, of new health service institutions and of the clinical governance activities of primary care groups. Behaviour change reflects GPs' decisions about what to record in case notes as well as their clinical decisions, so that findings may reflect changing perceptions about accountability rather than about preferred treatment regimes. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline production and dissemination is best seen in the broader context of policy change. Studies of guideline implementation should report before and after data and incorporate significant qualitative components in order to identify important contextual factors.

Angina Pectoris↗

PubMed2006

Drug therapy recommendations from the 2005 ACC/AHA guidelines for treatment of chronic heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To review and discuss key aspects of the drug therapy recommendations in the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure (HF) in the Adult. DATA SOURCES: Data were obtained from the ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for Chronic HF. English-language clinical trials, observational studies, and pertinent review articles evaluating the pharmacotherapy of chronic HF were identified, based on MEDLINE searches through January 2006. STUDY SELECTION: Articles presenting information that impacts the evidence base for recommendations regarding the use of various drug therapies in patients with chronic HF were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: The ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for HF provides revised, evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of chronic HF. The new guidelines are based on a staging system that recognizes both the development and progression of HF. Recommendations are provided for 2 stages of patients (A and B) who do not yet have clinical HF but are clearly at risk and 2 stages (C and D) that include patients with symptomatic HF. The guidelines continue to emphasize the important role of neurohormonal blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, beta-adrenergic blockers, and aldosterone antagonists. Based on recent trials, updated recommendations address the roles of combination therapy and the selective addition of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate. Along with specific drug recommendations, information on the practical use of various drugs is provided. Although the guidelines primarily focus on HF due to systolic dysfunction, general recommendations are also provided for patients with preserved systolic function. CONCLUSIONS: The ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update provides evidence-based recommendations for healthcare professionals involved in the care of adults with chronic HF. Recent clinical trial findings have further clarified the evolving role of neurohormonal-blocking drugs in the prevention and treatment of HF.

American Heart Association↗

PubMed2005

From autonomy to accountability: the role of clinical practice guidelines in professional power.

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) aims to address the persistent problem of clinical practice variation with the help of various tools, including standardized practice guidelines. Based on a systematic evaluation of the available scientific evidence, these guidelines offer recommendations for clinicians about details of patient care and clinical decision making. Because clinical practice guidelines specify how health care should be performed, they could be considered a threat to clinical and professional autonomy. Inspired by the theory of countervailing powers, this article explores how clinical practice guidelines have shifted the focus of professional power from autonomy to accountability. Professional organizations develop clinical practice guidelines as a service to their members but do not require strict adherence to the guidelines. Indeed, implementation studies show at best a modest change in clinical behavior. Such non-adherence might render a profession vulnerable, however, when third parties seize upon guidelines and offer financial incentives to keep clinicians accountable for delivering optimal patient care.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗

PubMed2000

Clinical practice guidelines vs actual clinical practice : the asthma paradigm.

In recent years, a multitude of practice guidelines, statements, position papers, and "best practices" have been promulgated for a number of disease entities by a variety of medical societies and managed care organizations. In the case of asthma, for example, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) initially published guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma in 1991; these recommendations were updated in 1997. However, health-care providers have not widely and consistently adhered to these guidelines. Several recent publications suggest that this underutilization of the NIH asthma guidelines may in part be related to a lack of understanding. This lack of understanding appears to span the spectrum of physicians in private practice, physicians working in health maintenance organizations, as well as university-affiliated physicians. Moreover, both primary-care physicians and "asthma specialists" share deficits in their knowledge base. To compound the problem, patients with asthma also demonstrate poor adherence to the guidelines. This poor adherence is evident irrespective of the patient's socioeconomic status. These types of data clearly indicate a need for further educational programs directed to both physicians and patients. However, as with the development and promulgation of any practice guideline, physicians need to be convinced that there exists compelling evidence from well-controlled clinical trials, for example, or from evidence-based medicine, to substantiate implementation of these guidelines.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Improved clinical outcomes with utilization of a community-acquired pneumonia guideline.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported decreased mortality following implementation of a community-acquired pneumonia guideline derived from specialty society recommendations. However, patients with respiratory failure and sepsis from pneumonia were not included, adjustment for comorbidities was limited, and no guideline compliance data were available. We also questioned whether decreased mortality continued after 1997. METHODS: We utilized Utah data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid from 1993 to 2003 to determine if pneumonia guideline implementation was associated with 30-day all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate. We adjusted outcomes by age, gender, Deyo comorbidity score, prior hospitalizations, and race. Guideline compliance was measured by initial default guideline antibiotic administration. We included patients > or = 66 years old with primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 480.0-483.9, 485.0-486.9, 487.0, 507.0 or 518.81, and 038.x with secondary code pneumonia. We excluded patients with prior hospitalization within 10 days, patients with HIV infection or transplant recipients, and patients not treated by physicians closely affiliated with study hospitals. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) age of 17,728 pneumonia patients admitted to the hospital was 72.3 +/- 12.0 years, 55.2% were female, and 96.0% were white. Within Intermountain Healthcare hospitals, a 1-SD increase (10%) in guideline compliance (range, 61 to 100%) was associated with mortality odds ratio (OR) of 0.92 (95% confidence interval[CI], 0.87 to 0.98; p = 0.007). Mortality OR at 16 Intermountain Healthcare hospitals was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.97; p = 0.007) compared with 19 other Utah hospitals. This mortality difference corresponds to approximately 20 lives saved yearly. The readmission rate was also lower. CONCLUSION: Improved clinical outcomes were associated with pneumonia guideline utilization.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Knowing how to help tobacco users. Dentists' familiarity and compliance with the clinical practice guideline.

BACKGROUND: A U.S. Public Health Service-sponsored clinical practice guideline urges all health care providers to make tobacco-use cessation counseling a routine part of clinical practice. This study assessed practices of dentists in east Texas, their adherence to the guideline and barriers to adherence. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey mailed September 2003 through January 2004 assessed demographic characteristics and knowledge, attitudes and activities of 783 dentists. The survey focused on familiarity with the guideline, adherence to the recommended steps (including the "5 A's" for tobacco users willing to quit and the "5 R's" for tobacco users unwilling to quit), perceived barriers and time spent counseling. RESULTS: Most dentists were unfamiliar with the guideline and usually did not follow its recommended steps. Less than 20 percent of dentists spent three or more minutes per patient on counseling. Knowledge of and training in using the guideline were significantly associated with adherence and time spent counseling. Lack of training was cited as the greatest barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Most dentists in east Texas are unaware of the clinical practice guideline. Lack of training is a major barrier to adherence. Practice Implications. Opportunities for improving patients' health through brief counseling interventions are missed. Measures are needed to increase dentists' familiarity with and adherence to the guideline.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and evaluation of the child with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. American Academy of Pediatrics.

This clinical practice guideline provides recommendations for the assessment and diagnosis of school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This guideline, the first of 2 sets of guidelines to provide recommendations on this condition, is intended for use by primary care clinicians working in primary care settings. The second set of guidelines will address the issue of treatment of children with ADHD. The Committee on Quality Improvement of the American Academy of Pediatrics selected a committee composed of pediatricians and other experts in the fields of neurology, psychology, child psychiatry, development, and education, as well as experts from epidemiology and pediatric practice. In addition, this panel consists of experts in education and family practice. The panel worked with Technical Resources International, Washington, DC, under the auspices of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, to develop the evidence base of literature on this topic. The resulting evidence report was used to formulate recommendations for evaluation of the child with ADHD. Major issues contained within the guideline address child and family assessment; school assessment, including the use of various rating scales; and conditions seen frequently among children with ADHD. Information is also included on the use of current diagnostic coding strategies. The deliberations of the committee were informed by a systematic review of evidence about prevalence, coexisting conditions, and diagnostic tests. Committee decisions were made by consensus where definitive evidence was not available. The committee report underwent review by sections of the American Academy of Pediatrics and external organizations before approval by the Board of Directors. The guideline contains the following recommendations for diagnosis of ADHD: 1) in a child 6 to 12 years old who presents with inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, academic underachievement, or behavior problems, primary care clinicians should initiate an evaluation for ADHD; 2) the diagnosis of ADHD requires that a child meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria; 3) the assessment of ADHD requires evidence directly obtained from parents or caregivers regarding the core symptoms of ADHD in various settings, the age of onset, duration of symptoms, and degree of functional impairment; 4) the assessment of ADHD requires evidence directly obtained from the classroom teacher (or other school professional) regarding the core symptoms of ADHD, duration of symptoms, degree of functional impairment, and associated conditions; 5) evaluation of the child with ADHD should include assessment for associated (coexisting) conditions; and 6) other diagnostic tests are not routinely indicated to establish the diagnosis of ADHD but may be used for the assessment of other coexisting conditions (eg, learning disabilities and mental retardation). This clinical practice guideline is not intended as a sole source of guidance in the evaluation of children with ADHD. Rather, it is designed to assist primary care clinicians by providing a framework for diagnostic decisionmaking. It is not intended to replace clinical judgment or to establish a protocol for all children with this condition and may not provide the only appropriate approach to this problem.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease in children and adolescents: evaluation, classification, and stratification.

OBJECTIVES: A series of new guidelines has been developed by the National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative to improve the detection and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In most instances of CKD, the earliest manifestations of the disorder may be identified by relatively simple tests. Unfortunately, CKD is often "underdiagnosed," in part because of the absence of a common definition of CKD and a classification of the stages in its progression. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative clinical practice guidelines for CKD evaluation, classification, and stratification provide a basis to remedy these deficits. The specific goals of the guidelines described in this review are to provide: 1) an overview of the clinical practice guidelines as they pertain to children and adolescents, 2) a simple classification of the stages of CKD, and 3) a practical approach to the laboratory assessment of kidney disease in children and adolescents. METHODS: The guidelines were developed as part of an evidence-based evaluation of CKD and its consequences in patients of all ages. The data that were used to generate the guidelines in this article were extracted from a structured analysis of articles that reported on children with CKD. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: This review presents the definition and 5-stage classification system of CKD developed by the work group assigned to develop the guidelines, and summarizes the major recommendations regarding the early detection of CKD. Major emphasis is placed on the identification of children and adolescents with CKD by measuring the protein-to-creatinine ratio in spot urine specimens and by estimating the glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine using prediction equations.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Adherence to asthma guidelines in general practices.

Adherence to asthma practice guidelines is low. Improved compliance could potentially improve care of patients with asthma. The purpose of this study was to determine if patients managed in a general practice with an associated asthma clinic are more likely to use asthma medications according to clinical practice guidelines than patients managed in the general surgery of the practice. A cross-sectional study of adult asthmatics, aged 18-55 years, was conducted in six British general practices. Prescription data on all asthma medication was collected for a 6-month period. Information on asthma clinic attendance, age, sex, employment status, other medical illness, and how patients used their inhaled beta2-agonist was collected through questionnaire. The prescription data for asthma medication and patient use of inhaled beta2-agonist were compared to the British Thoracic Society's (BTS) Guidelines for Management of Asthma in Adults to determine if the patient's asthma medication regimen was appropriate. There was no significant association found between appropriate asthma medication and asthma clinic attendance or other patient characteristics. Adherence to the BTS guidelines was low. Fifty-eight percent of the asthma patients used asthma medication regimens that were not consistent with the BTS guidelines published 1 year earlier. Adherence to the BTS guidelines was low regardless of patient characteristics, including asthma clinic attendance, age, sex, employment status, other medical illness, or individual practice. These findings underscore the need to document the utility of clinical practice guidelines which may improve physician compliance.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

PubMed2002

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Unipolar Depressive Disorders, Part 1: Acute and continuation treatment of major depressive disorder.

These practice guidelines for the biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). The goal for developing these guidelines was to systematically review all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of unipolar depressive disorders, and to produce a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating patients with these conditions. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for depressive disorders, as well as from meta-analyses and reviews on the efficacy of antidepressant medications and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and was then categorized into four levels of evidence (A-D). This first part of the guidelines covers disease definition, classification, epidemiology and course of unipolar depressive disorders, as well as the management of the acute and continuation-phase treatment. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antidepressants, other psychopharmacological and hormonal medications, electroconvulsive therapy, light therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of young adults and also, albeit to a lesser extent, children, adolescents and older adults.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Hepatitis C: nutrition care Canadian guidelines for health care providers.

Nutrition plays a critical role in the management of hepatitis C. Dietitians of Canada has developed comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines to familiarize health care providers with effective nutrition care for the growing number of Canadians infected with the hepatitis C virus. The complete guidelines and two supporting educational fact sheets are available for downloading from http://www.dietitians.ca/resources/HepatitisC_Guidelines.htm. The guidelines and fact sheets are available in both English and French. The guidelines contain the full text, practice essentials, references, and extensive appendices with practical tools to assist educators in promoting nutrition to persons infected with the hepatitis C virus. Reprinting or photocopying of the document is encouraged provided the source is acknowledged. In addition, an on-line education course is available for health care providers and is available on www.dieteticsatwork.ca. These guidelines are directed to all health care providers who are in a position to offer nutrition-related advice and guidance to persons infected with the hepatitis C virus, in all stages of the disease. A national advisory committee comprised of leading authorities in Canada steered the development of the guidelines. The guidelines are based on the best information available at the time of publication; where scientific evidence was not available, best-accepted practice is presented.

Canada↗

PubMed1999

Clinical practice guidelines for bipolar disorder from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

BACKGROUND: For the last several years, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has been involved in the development of practice guidelines for major medical, surgical, and mental disorders. This article describes the development and content of the VA-Clinical Practice Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder, which are available in their entirety on the Journal Web site (http://www. psychiatrist.com). METHOD: A multidisciplinary work group composed of content experts in the field of bipolar disorder and practitioners in general clinical practice was convened by the VA's Office of Performance and Quality and the Mental Health Strategic Health Group. The work group was instructed in algorithm development and methods of evidence evaluation. Draft guidelines were developed over the course of 6 months of meetings and conference calls, and that draft was then sent to nationally prominent content experts for final critique. RESULTS: The Bipolar Guidelines are part of the family of the VA Clinical Guidelines for Management of Persons with Psychosis and consist of explicit algorithms supplemented by annotations that explain the specific decision points and their basis in the scientific literature. The guidelines are organized into 5 modules: a Core Module for diagnosis and assignment to mood state plus 4 treatment modules (Manic/Hypomanic/Mixed Episode, Bipolar Depressive Episode, Rapid Cycling, and Bipolar Disorder With Psychotic Features). The modules specify particular diagnostic and treatment tasks at each step, including both somatotherapeutic and psychotherapeutic interventions. CONCLUSION: The VA Bipolar Guidelines are designed for easy clinical reference in decision making with individual patients, as well as for use as a scholarly reference tool. They also have utility in training activities and quality improvement programs.

American Heart Association↗