PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Persistent Vegetative State”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,387 records · Page 77Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

A concise rebuttal.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Communication Barriers↗
PubMed2000

[Role of grandaxin in the treatment of functional gastrointestinal diseases].

AIM: To assess efficacy of grandaxine in correction of anxiety syndrome and vegetative dysfunction in patients with gastrointestinal diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The trial included 59 patients with functional gastrointestinal, emotional and vegetative disorders who failed standard therapy. 43 patients of the test group received standard therapy in combination with grandaxine. RESULTS: Anxiety (Spilberg-Khanin scale), vegetative dysfunction (Vein scale) reduced in 90% of the patients of the test group more significantly than in the control group. Intestinal passage in patients with irritable colon syndrome improved also. CONCLUSION: A pronounced role of psychovegetative disorders was confirmed in development of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Grandaxine proved efficient in correction of such disorders irrespective of location of the pathology and prevalent tonicity of the autonomic nervous system.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Why we need a theory of suffering, and lots of other theories as well: commentary.

In the first section of his article, "The Role of Suffering and Community in Clinical Ethics," Erich Loewy sketches a theory of suffering. His conviction is that clinical medical ethics is not clearly rooted in theory and is inadequately grounded because of this. While acknowledging the merits of virtue ethics and casuistry, Loewy quickly dispenses with them, as contenders for this theoretical basis. Kantianism and utilitarianism are likewise rejected as "a universally acceptable grounding for ethics." In their place, Loewy proposes that "a deeper and more universal grounding can be found in the capacity of sentient beings to suffer." It is on this capacity to suffer that he builds his hierarchies of moral value, including primary, secondary, and symbolic worth. This theory of suffering should be welcomed. It promises to expand our awareness of clinical experience, and moral life generally, away from autonomy, utility, or virtue orientations toward attention to suffering and our response to it. Such a theory can give us a revitalized language to probe the issues of medical ethics. This should lead us to a careful reading of Loewy's larger work on which this article is based. Yet my enthusiasm is tempered by Loewy's noncritical acceptance of a peculiar, yet pervasive, understanding of the role and use of theory in ethics....

Animal Rights↗