SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ANESTHESIA, REGIONAL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Synthesis of the literature on the effectiveness of regional anesthesia for cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the findings of the randomized trials of regional anesthesia management strategies for cataract surgery. DESIGN: Literature review and analysis. METHOD: The authors performed a systematic search of the literature to identify all articles pertaining to regional anesthesia during cataract surgery on adults. One investigator abstracted the content of each article onto a custom-designed form. A second investigator corroborated the findings. The evidence supporting the anesthesia approaches was graded by consensus as good, fair, poor, or insufficient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evidence supporting the effectiveness of different forms of regional anesthesia. RESULTS: There was good evidence that retrobulbar and peribulbar blocks provide equivalent akinesia and pain control during cataract surgery. Additionally, sub-Tenon's blocks were at least as effective as retrobulbar and peribulbar blocks. There was good evidence that retrobulbar block provides better pain control during surgery than topical anesthesia, and there was fair evidence that peribulbar block provides better pain control than topical anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: This synthesis of the literature demonstrates that currently used approaches to anesthesia management provide adequate pain control for successful cataract surgery, but there is some variation in the effectiveness of the most commonly used techniques. Data are needed on patient preferences to determine the optimal strategies for anesthesia management during cataract surgery.

Anesthesia, Local↗

PubMed2001

Tramadol added to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: Sixty volunteers, divided into four groups of 15 each, received IV regional anesthesia of the upper limb with 40 mL tramadol 0.25%, sodium chloride 0.9%, lidocaine 0.5%, or 100 mg tramadol-containing lidocaine 0.5%. By using a double-blinded method, we tested the onset and recovery of sensory block at six sites of the forearm and hand as well as onset of complete motor block. The symptoms after deflation of the tourniquet were recorded. The onset and recovery of sensory block and the onset of motor block were similar in the tramadol and saline groups. However, in the Tramadol-Lidocaine Group, the speed of onset of sensory block was faster than in the Lidocaine Group. In the Tramadol and the Tramadol-Lidocaine Groups, the incidence of skin rash and painful or burning sensation at the injection site was increased. We conclude that tramadol 0.25% does not have a local anesthetic effect when used as a sole drug for IV regional anesthesia, but might modify the action of local anesthetic, providing a shorter onset time of sensory block. IMPLICATIONS: Tramadol, a centrally acting analgesic, might have local anesthetic properties, as do some opioid drugs. We demonstrated that 0.25% tramadol solution containing 100 mg tramadol is not effective as a sole drug, but may improve the action of 0.5% lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia. The increased incidence of side effects may limit the clinical use of tramadol.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Complications of regional anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery.

Ocular regional anesthesia can be accomplished with either a peribulbar or retrobulbar approach. Each has advantages and disadvantages. Complications can be vision-threatening or life-threatening. Positioning the eye in neutral gaze when retrobulbar block is executed and using a needle no longer than 31 mm are effective strategies to reduce the incidence of serious complications.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗

PubMed2003

Backache, headache, and neurologic deficit after regional anesthesia.

Back pain, chemical backache, PDPH, and neurologic deficit all may be reported after regional anesthesia for childbirth. Back pain is common during pregnancy, but epidural analgesia during labor does not increase the incidence of long-term back pain. Chemical backache caused by 2-chloroprocaine is probably a result of hypocalcemic tetany of paraspinous muscles. The mechanism is presumed to be chelation of calcium by sodium bisulfite, an antioxidant present in nesacaine-MPF. PDPH after dural puncture is caused by leakage of CSF, which causes cerebral hypotension. Cerebral hypotension leads to traction on pain-sensitive intracranial structures and cerebral vasodilation. Initial therapy includes hydration, caffeine, and sumatriptan. EBP is the most effective treatment in severe PDPH. If the first EBP fails, a second blood patch can be performed. Neurologic deficits after regional anesthesia are rare. Meticulous technique and vigilance are the keystones in avoiding major neurologic complications of regional anesthesia. Rapid diagnosis and appropriate treatment are essential to optimize a successful outcome if complications do develop.

Analgesia, Epidural↗

PubMed1999

Comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section: success rate, blood loss and satisfaction from a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective randomized trial was organized to compare the effectiveness of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean section (C/S). METHOD: Three hundred and forty-one patients were randomized into the general anesthesia group (GA), epidural anesthesia group (EA) and spinal anesthesia group (SA). The effectiveness of interest was success rate, blood loss and patient satisfaction. RESULT: We found that the success rates of EA and SA were lower than GA. Success in EA should be improved by using an epidural catheter to add more local anesthetic drug instead of a single shot; and the surgeon should allow more time for the block to work adequately. Success in SA should be improved by using bupivacaine instead of lidocaine. GA resulted in significantly more blood loss, lower postoperative hematocrit, and higher proportion of patients who had postoperative hematocrit < 30 per cent than EA and SA. The patients' satisfaction scores were not different among the 3 techniques. This meant that, given adequate explanation and perioperative care, Thai women were satisfied with regional anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Regional anesthesia is a better choice of anesthesia for C/S than general anesthesia. However, the availability of different techniques and ability to change the technique when needed were very useful and important. If GA is chosen, all safety procedures must be followed. Oxygen supplement and endotracheal intubation facilities must be available in all techniques. Guidelines of anesthesia for C/S at a national level should be agreed upon, including the type of personnel, monitoring equipment and postoperative care.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Regional anesthesia: considerations for the perioperative nurse.

Recent literature suggests that regional anesthesia can improve outcome and decrease hospital stay and costs. Through a better understanding of regional anesthesia, the perioperative nurse specialist can be an invaluable asset to both the patient and anesthesiologist. This article discusses the indications and limitations of the more common regional anesthetic techniques.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗

PubMed1997

Regional anesthesia for endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of regional anesthesia for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: Since February 1995, 21 patients (17 men and 4 women; median age 67 years, range 49 to 80) have been treated with endovascular technique for true infrarenal AAA using Mialhe Stentor bifurcated grafts. A single dose of spinal anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia was used in all procedures. Electrocardiography and arterial blood pressure were monitored. RESULTS: No cases of emboli, hematoma, or graft migration were seen, and there were no reoperations or conversions to operation. Arterial blood pressure was stable at a satisfactory level from induction of anesthesia throughout the procedure, and there was no period of clinically significant hypotension during any implantation. One patient died on the second postoperative day from cardiac and renal insufficiency. Three endoleaks were observed during the procedure; one healed spontaneously within 5 weeks, and the other two were repaired by endovascular techniques after 1 and 4 months, respectively. During follow-up, one patient died at 6 months from pancreatic carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: The application of regional anesthesia is feasible for endovascular treatment of AAA. The arterial blood pressure remained stable throughout the procedure, and all patients, with two exceptions, were mobilized on the first day and placed on a regular diet. Based on these early results, it appears that regional anesthesia is feasible, effective, and safe for endovascular AAA repair.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

The methodologic quality of clinical trials on regional anesthesia for cataract surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the methodologic quality of published randomized trials of regional anesthesia management strategies for cataract surgery. DESIGN: Literature review and analysis. METHOD: We performed a systematic search of the literature to identify all articles pertaining to regional anesthesia for cataract surgery on adults. Overall quality scores and scores for individual methodologic domains were based on the evaluations of two investigators experienced in methodologic research who independently reviewed all relevant articles using a quality abstraction form. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Study quality in each of five domains: representativeness, bias and confounding, intervention description, outcomes and follow-up, and statistical quality and interpretation. RESULTS: Eighty-two randomized clinical trials were identified with a mean overall quality score of 44%. The mean domain scores ranged from 37% for representativeness to 58% for outcomes and follow-up. Forty percent or fewer studies received the maximum score for reporting the setting, the population, and the start and end dates; describing the inclusion and exclusion criteria; adequately randomizing subjects; and adequately masking individuals participating in the study. Key outcomes were often inadequately reported, including the distribution of patient-reported pain scores and the mean surgical time. CONCLUSIONS: Greater attention to methodologic quality and detailed reporting of study results will improve the ability of readers to interpret the results of clinical trials assessing regional anesthesia for cataract surgery.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

"See one, do one, teach one, have one": a novel variation on regional anesthesia training.

INTRODUCTION: Is it possible to determine the number of nerve blocks needed for residents to become competent in regional anesthesia? Several studies have focused on this question, and the Residency Review Committee (RRC) for Anesthesiology has now defined a "minimum clinical experience" for some aspects of regional anesthesia training. In our experience, personally being a regional block recipient can also serve to enhance training. METHODS: Many residents at Virginia Mason Medical Center have received regional anesthetics as volunteers in research projects. We designed questionnaires to define their perceptions in both performing and receiving regional anesthesia. RESULTS: Twenty-one residents were recipients of a total of 72 regional anesthetic procedures. Many residents' comments focused on the discomfort of local anesthesia infiltration, the value of sedation, a better appreciation of the patients' perspectives, and improved preoperative consultation. Residents experiencing paresthesias were more likely to consider paresthesias as bad (P =.0098). CONCLUSION: The lessons learned from personally receiving a regional anesthetic are invaluable and can improve the quality of training, as well as the relationship between anesthesiologist and patient.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Intravenous regional anesthesia: new approaches to an old technique.

The pace of modern surgical procedures demands a fast and effective regional anesthesia technique. Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) is such a technique. Traditionally, IVRA has been limited by tourniquet pain, inability to provide postoperative analgesia, and lack of a bloodless field for microsurgical repairs. Current research indicates that these limitations can be significantly improved with alteration of the block solution or alteration of the exsanguination technique. Additions to the local anesthetic such as meperidine, ketorolac, and clonidine have been shown to increase tourniquet tolerance and significantly improve postoperative analgesia. Additionally, when a bloodless field is required for microvascular surgery or nerve repairs, a re-exsanguination technique can be used. Advances in IVRA have made this technique an excellent choice for cases involving the hand, forearm, foot, and lower leg cases that least 60 minutes or less.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗

PubMed1996

Effects of regional anesthesia on perioperative outcome.

To provide an overview of current knowledge, this article reviews experimental and clinical data from investigations examining effects of regional anesthesia on perioperative morbidity in specific physiologic systems. The issues of morbidity and mortality following general and regional anesthesia are addressed, as are the development of perioperative thromboembolism and blood loss, which are known to be increased during general anesthesia. Finally, the effects of regional anesthesia on the vascular system, the perioperative stress response, and the pulmonary function are discussed.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗

PubMed2006

[Complications and adverse events in continuous peripheral regional anesthesia Results of investigations on 3,491 catheters].

INTRODUCTION: Over a period of 36 months we prospectively documented infectious, neurological and other complications or adverse events occurring during 3,491 peripheral regional anesthesias via a catheter using computer-based data recording. METHODS: The investigation included 936 axillar plexus catheters, 473 interscalene plexus catheters, 125 vertical infraclavicular plexus catheters, 74 catheters with psoas compartment blocks, 900 femoral nerve catheters, 964 sciatic nerve catheters and 19 catheters in other localizations. The regional anesthesia catheters were inserted under sterile circumstances (hood, facemask, sterile gloves and coat, surgical disinfection and sterile covering of the placement site) and under peripheral nerve stimulation. RESULTS: 3,070 (87.9%) of the regional anesthesias via catheter, were carried out without any complications. Inflammation (two out of three criteria: redness at insertion site, pain on palpation or swelling) was found in 146 patients (4.2% of all cases). Infections (two out of the criteria: CRP elevation, pus on the insertion site, fever, leucocytosis, necessary antibiotic treatment with exclusion of other possible causes) appeared in 2.4% of all cases (83 patients). In 29 patients (0.8%) we observed severe infections (surgical intervention necessary e.g. abscess incision). Risk factors for inflammation or infections included duration of catheter therapy, cervical localization of the catheter and the experience of the anesthesiologist (p<0.05). Bacterial species most frequently found were Staphylococcus aureus (54%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (38%). In 0.3% (9 patients) we found short lasting neurological deficits and in 6 patients (0.2%) we recorded a nerve lesion that lasted more than 6 weeks. Other complications occurred in 4.2% of all cases. DISCUSSION: Special complications such as infections in peripheral catheter regional anesthesia are rare but can pose severe problems. A close postoperative supervision of all regional catheters has to be ensured under careful consideration of the risk factors for infections and the accompanying symptoms.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Regional anesthesia and anticoagulation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients receiving perioperative anticoagulation are a challenge for anesthesiologists when regional anesthesia would be a beneficial component of the anesthetic plan. Newly approved antithrombotic drugs maintain the need for updated review articles and recommendations. RECENT FINDINGS: Due to the very low incidence of bleeding complications, guidelines are solely based on retrospective analyses of case reports and pharmacological considerations. Hence, they should not be taken as evidence-based 'cook books'. Recommendations of well established anticoagulants like heparin and non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs may have a solid basis. However, the lack of data on new antithrombotic drugs including GII/GIIIA antagonists, factor X and thrombin-inhibitors requires a more conservative approach when regional anesthesia is considered. Current literature emphasizes postoperative monitoring; clear recommendations of its performance, however, are missing. SUMMARY: Decisions to perform regional anesthesia in patients under anticoagulation should always be made on an individual risk-benefit assessment. A vigilant preoperative evaluation of the patient's medication and physical findings are as important as awareness of postoperative plans for anticoagulation.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2002

Maternal benefit of corticosteroid therapy in patients with HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome: impact on the rate of regional anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to assess the impact of glucocorticoid administration on the rate of regional anesthesia in women with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count (HELLP) syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: Maternal records of pregnancies with HELLP syndrome managed between April 1994 and December 1999 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were identified with antepartum HELLP syndrome and 46 (66%) received glucocorticoids. The presence of thrombocytopenia at admission and the interval from presentation to delivery was evaluated to assess the impact of glucocorticoid use. In the 37 women who had platelet counts of <90,000/mm3, 0 in the untreated group (0 of 11) versus 42% in the steroid group (11 of 26) received regional anesthetic, P =.015. Furthermore, the rate of regional anesthesia increased from 0 in the untreated group delivered within 24 hours (n = 10) to 57% (8 of 14) in the glucocorticoid group, in which women attained a 24-hour latency from presentation to delivery, P =.006. The need for general anesthesia also decreased significantly in treated women who attained a 24-hour latency compared to untreated women who did not, 100% (n = 7) versus 22% (n = 9), P =.003. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of glucocorticoids increases the use of regional anesthesia in women with antepartum HELLP syndrome who have thrombocytopenia, particularly in those who achieve a latency of 24 hours before delivery.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Interscalene regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite a trend toward the use of regional anesthesia for orthopaedic procedures, there has been resistance to the use of interscalene regional block for shoulder surgery because of concerns about failed blocks and potential complications. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 568 consecutive patients who had shoulder surgery under interscalene regional block in a tertiary-care, university-based practice with an anesthesiology residency program. The blocks were performed by a group of anesthesiologists who were dedicated to the concept of regional anesthesia in their practice. Complete anesthetic and orthopaedic records were available for 547 patients. The surgical procedure, planned type of anesthesia, occurrence of block failure, and the presence of complications were noted. RESULTS: Of the 547 patients, 295 underwent an arthroscopic procedure and 252 (including eighty who had an arthroplasty) underwent an open procedure. General anesthesia was the initial planned choice for sixty-nine patients because of the complexity or duration of the procedure, the anatomic location, or patient insistence. Thirty-four of the sixty-nine patients also received an interscalene regional block. Interscalene regional block alone was planned for 478 patients. A total of 462 patients (97%) had a successful block whereas sixteen required general anesthesia because the block was inadequate. The success of the block was independent of the type or length of the surgery. No patient had a seizure, pneumothorax, cardiac event, or other major complication. Twelve (2.3%) of the 512 patients who had a block had minor complications, which included sensory neuropathy in eleven patients and a complex regional pain syndrome that resolved at three months in one patient. For ten of the eleven patients, the neuropathy had resolved by six months. CONCLUSIONS: Interscalene regional block provides effective anesthesia for most types of shoulder surgery, including arthroplasty and fracture fixation. When administered by an anesthesiologist committed to and skilled in the technique, the block has an excellent rate of success and is associated with a relatively low complication rate.

Arthroplasty↗

PubMed2026

A one‑year snapshot of pediatric regional anesthesia at a French Tertiary University Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia (RA) is a major component of multimodal perioperative analgesia in children. Despite proven benefits, pediatric RA practice shows marked inter-institutional and international variability, with global practice patterns remaining largely underreported. This study aimed to characterize current RA practices in a pediatric anesthesia department of a French tertiary university hospital. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data over one year included all children aged 0-18 years receiving at least one RA procedure. The data analyzed comprised demographics, surgical characteristics, RA techniques, guidance methods, and pharmacologic agents. Each RA procedure was considered an independent event, and patients were stratified into five age groups. RESULTS: Over the study period, 907 patients (6.0 [1.0; 12.0] years) underwent 1073 RA procedures: 894 peripheral blocks (83%) and 179 neuraxial blocks (17%). Peripheral blocks predominated in children >6 months (90%), while 59% of neuraxial RA were in infants <6 months. RA was conducted under general anesthesia in 90% of cases; awake spinal anesthesia in small infants comprised most neuraxial procedures. Ultrasound guidance was used in 98% of peripheral blocks, and pre-puncture scanning preceded 22% of neuraxial procedures. Clonidine was used as an adjuvant in >60% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: This single-center cohort reports one year of pediatric RA practice, characterized by high RA implementation rates. While ultrasound guidance was standard for peripheral blocks, pre-puncture scanning remains infrequently used for neuraxial techniques, highlighting a potential margin for improvement based on current practice. Results highlight selective neuraxial strategies in vulnerable infants and routine adjuvant use to optimize postoperative analgesia. Findings confirm RA feasibility in daily pediatric anesthesia and support multicenter studies evaluating inter-institutional variability and outcomes impact.

Humans↗

PubMed2000

Choosing general versus regional anesthesia for the elderly.

Although clinical perceptions and theoretic considerations suggest regional anesthesia should be safer than general anesthesia in elderly patients, current studies indicate no difference in outcomes. Regional anesthesia may still prove superior to general anesthesia if the right patient population or right endpoints are identified for comparison. A study of consequence of outcome, comparing the two approaches has created an expansion of the definition of anesthesia-related complications.

Aged↗

PubMed1993

Neonatal regional anesthesia: alternative to general anesthesia for urologic surgery.

The physiologic immaturity of respiratory musculature and central respiratory control centers leads to an increased risk of apnea and respiratory complications following general anesthesia in the neonate. Regional anesthetic techniques such as spinal and caudal epidural anesthesia may obviate the need for general anesthesia and lessen the risks of perioperative morbidity. Although these techniques have been previously described in infants, the majority of reports focus on regional anesthesia during herniorrhaphy in the former, preterm infant. There is relatively little or no information concerning regional anesthesia during urologic surgery in infants, especially during the actual neonatal period (0 to 28 days). We report on three neonates (2.17 to 3.8 kg) who required anesthetic care during the neonatal period for various urologic procedures including cystoscopy, incision of a ureterocele, and vesicostomy placement. Either caudal or spinal anesthesia was successfully used in the awake infant without the need for supplemental anesthetic agents (intravenous or inhalational). The advantages, risks, and applications of regional anesthesia during urologic surgery in the neonate are reviewed.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗