PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Anesthesia, Intravenous”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[Total intravenous anesthesia with ketamine and the condition of the higher psychic function in the early and remote postoperative periods].

Influence of total intravenous anesthesia with ketamine on the higher psychic function was studied, immediately after surgery and in the remote postoperative period, in 143 patients with different typological properties of the nervous system after a scheduled surgery--supravaginal uterectomy in fibromyoma of the uterine body. The authors defined 6 groups of patients with different typological properties of the nervous system. Persistent impairment of the higher nervous functions were established, immediately after surgery and in the remote postoperative period, in patients with a weak nervous system, biased nervous balance towards excitation, and with lability of nervous processes. Total intravenous anesthesia with ketamine, when used in patients with the robust nervous system, biased nervous balance towards excitation, and with lability of nervous processes, caused changes in the higher nervous functions and an intensified level of nervous-and-psychic loads, which were unstable and were arrested by the 30th postoperative day. The use of such anesthetic scheme was found to be inadvisable in the above groups of patients. The described impairments were not registered when total intravenous anesthesia was used in patients with a balanced nervous system irrespective of its type, a biased nervous balance towards inhibition and with inertness of nervous processes. The above anesthetic management is acceptable for such patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

[Evaluation of emergence from total intravenous anesthesia with propofol for long neurosurgery].

In six neurosurgical patients we examined their emergence from more than six hours of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl. The anesthesia was maintained properly with total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and fentanyl without nitrous oxide. We calculated the estimated blood concentration of propofol from the anesthesia record using a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model. The patients were extubated after they had shown good awareness. The average time for extubation was 18 minutes after discontinuation of propofol infusion. The mean estimated concentration of propofol at the extubation was 1.36 micrograms.ml-1 (range: 1.1-1.5 micrograms.ml-1). The estimated emergence times in these cases, also calculated with the pharmacokinetic model, correlated significantly with the time from discontinuation of propofol infusion to the patients' awakening. It was concluded, first, that the estimated concentration of propofol at extubation after long anesthesia was similar to that measured in common cases, and second, that we could reduce the emergence time at the tail end of long-sustained neurosurgery by avoiding the delay in emergence.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Does propofol have advantages over midazolam and isoflurane? Comparative study of 2 total intravenous anesthesia techniques using midazolam and propofol, versus balanced anesthesia with isoflurane].

OBJECTIVES: To compare two techniques for total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA): midazolam-alfentanil-flumazenil and propofol-alfentanil, contrasting them with combined anesthesia (thiopental-isoflurane-alfentanil) and assessing the efficacy of flumazenil in continuous perfusion for preventing resedation in TIVA with midazolam. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The efficacy and clinical tolerance of the 3 anesthetic techniques with propofol, midazolam or isoflurane were studied in 63 patients undergoing elective breast, lumbar or gynecological surgery. Anesthetic induction was achieved with midazolam 0.3 mg/kg-1 (group M), propofol 2.5 mg/kg-1 (group P) or thiopental 3 mg/kg-1 (group I); all patients also received 50 micrograms/kg-1 alfentanil and vecuronium bromide 0.12 mg/kg-1/h-1. Maintenance was achieved with midazolam in perfusion at 0.12 mg/kg-1/h-1 (group M); propofol in perfusion at 7 mg/kg-1/h-1 and a pre-incision dose of 1.5 mg/kg-1 (group P); and isoflurane at 1.15% (group I). The 3 groups also received one pre-incision dose of alfentanil 25 micrograms/kg-1 and post-incision perfusion at 60 micrograms/kg-1/h-1. The infusion of alfentanil was changed by amounts of 20 micrograms/kg-1/h-1 in accordance with the patient's response to surgery. After surgery patients in group M received flumazenil 0.5 mg i.v. over 30 sec and a perfusion of flumazenil 0.5 mg over 60 min. Parameters indicating efficacy were: 1) total dose and timing of alfentanil; 2) number of instances of inadequate anesthesia; 3) peri-operative amnesia; 4) times of awakening and extubation after surgery, and 5) the number of patients in each group who required naloxone. Parameters indicating tolerance were: 1) hemodynamic variables; 2) the number of postoperative desaturations; 3) level of sedation, comprehension and motor coordination and orientation; 4) the "G/g detection" test and the memory recall test; 5) adverse side effects; 6) need for postoperative analgesia, and 7) evaluation of the anesthetic technique. RESULTS: The 3 techniques afforded effective control of hemodynamic response to intubation and surgical incision. Anesthetic maintenance was easy and safe with isoflurane and propofol. Higher doses of alfentanil, however, were needed with midazolam and we found a higher incidence of signs of superficial anesthesia. Reversion of midazolam with flumazenil 0.5 mg i.v. produced earlier awakening, although this was followed later by relapse into hypno-sedation that could not be prevented with a perfusion of flumazenil. Although recovery from anesthesia was slower with propofol than with isoflurane, we observed no differences in level of sedation, motor coordination and postoperative comprehension. Maintenance with isoflurane produced a higher incidence of adverse side effects such as tremors and nausea after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: None of the TIVA techniques proved superior in all the parameters studied during anesthetic maintenance when compared with balanced isoflurane-alfentanil, although the propofol-alfentanil combination was found to be superior to that of midazolam-alfentanil. After anesthesia, however, recovery was better with the association of propofol-alfentanil and adverse side effects were fewer. Flumazenil at the doses used was ineffective for preventing resedation due to midazolam.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Total intravenous anesthesia, spinal anesthesia or combined sciatic-femoral nerve block for outpatient knee arthroscopy.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare efficacy, efficiency and surgeon's satisfaction of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil with those of spinal or peripheral nerve blocks for outpatient knee arthroscopy. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients undergoing elective outpatient knee arthroscopy were randomly allocated to receive total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil (40), combined sciatic-femoral nerve block (40), or spinal anesthesia (40). Preparation times, surgeon's satisfaction, and discharge times with the 3 anesthesia techniques were measured. Anesthesia-related costs were also compared based on costs of drugs, disposable materials, and anesthesia and nurse staff. RESULTS: Preparation time was 13 min (8-22 min) with general anesthesia, 15 min (5-30 min) with spinal anesthesia and 15 min (5-25 min) with sciatic-femoral blocks (p=0.006). Surgeon's satisfaction was similar in the 3 groups, but 17 patients receiving peripheral nerve block (42%) and 12 receiving spinal anesthesia (30%) by-passed the postanesthesia care unit after surgery as compared with only 2 general anesthesia patients (5%) (p=0.01). Discharge from the postanesthesia care unit required 5 min (5-20 min) after peripheral block as compared with 15 min (5-25 min) with spinal and 15 min (5-80 min) with general anesthesia (p=0.005); however, stay in the Day-Surgery Unit was shorter after general anesthesia [170 (100-400) min] than peripheral [265 (110-485) min] or spinal blocks [230 (95-800) min] (p=0.026). Urinary retention was reported in 3 spinal patients only (8%) (p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Regional anesthesia techniques reduce the rate of admission and the duration of stay in the postanesthesia care unit as compared with general anesthesia. Peripheral rather than spinal nerve blocks should be preferred to minimise the risk for urinary retention.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

[Total intravenous anesthesia with continuous infusion of midazolam--study on plasma levels of midazolam and catecholamines].

Total intravenous anesthesia was performed with continuous infusion of midazolam and bolus injection of fentanyl. A bolus injection of midazolam 0.3 mg.kg-1 was followed by an infusion regimen with an initial infusion rate of 0.68 mg.kg-1.hr-1 for 15 min followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.125 mg.kg-1.hr-1 and infusion was stopped at about 30 min before the end of operation. Fentanyl and pancuronium were injected as required. Nicardipine was given for intraoperative hypertension. Plasma concentrations of epinephrine and norepinephrine decreased significantly at 10 min after induction, but increased significantly during operation. Therefore, this anesthetic method was considered not to be so deep. Plasma concentrations of midazolam were higher than 200 ng.ml-1 during operation. After discontinuation of midazolam infusion, its concentration decreased quickly, and the elimination half life of midazolam was 1.675 +/- 0.2807 hr. The value was not so large as we had anticipated. Total intravenous anesthesia with continuous infusion of midazolam and bolus injection of fentanyl is thought to produce light anesthesia. Plasma concentration of midazolam decreased quickly.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in orthotopic liver transplantation in swine].

OBJECTIVE: To study the use of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol as an anesthetic model for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in pigs. ANIMALS AND METHOD: Fifteen OLT were performed in pigs using portacava-jugular veno-venous shunt with an injector pump. Anesthesia was maintained by perfusion of 10 mg/kg/h propofol. Hemodynamic and biochemical measurements were recorded at the following times: AO, baseline; AI, five minutes before removal of the liver; B1, five minutes later but before starting the bypass injector pump; B2, five minutes after starting the injector pump; B3, five minutes before reperfusion; C1, five minutes after starting reperfusion, and C2, after aortic declamping. RESULTS: No cases of malignant hyperthermia appeared. When the liver was removed cardiac output decreased (p < 0.01), as did mean arterial pressure (p < 0.01), mixed venous saturation (p < 0.05), pulmonary capillary pressure and temperature (p < 0.05). Pulmonary vascular resistances increased (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol is a satisfactory experimental anesthetic model for OLT in pigs, and it prevents the possible appearance of malignant hyperthermia.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1992

Safety of interventional rigid bronchoscopy using intravenous anesthesia and spontaneous assisted ventilation. A prospective study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of total intravenous anesthesia and spontaneous assisted ventilation during interventional rigid bronchoscopy (IRB). DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative study. SETTING: A university hospital thoracic endoscopy and laser center. PATIENTS: Eighty-three patients underwent a total of 124 procedures (including Nd:Yag laser therapy, stent insertions, transbronchial biopsies/bronchoalveolar lavages (TBB/BALs) in transplant patients and others). Results of preanesthesia consultation, endoscopic and anesthesia intervention, perioperative complications, and time spent in recovery room were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: Respiratory complications occurred in 22 procedures (18 percent) and included severe intraoperative or postoperative oxyhemoglobin desaturations (19 cases), bronchospasms/laryngospasms (two cases), and one recurrent pneumothorax. These complications were mostly related to the endobronchial surgical procedure. Respiratory complications occurred more frequently in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3 and 4 status (p < 0.005) and in patients with a karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) below 70 (p < 0.05). No cardiac complications were noted, although 13 patients had significant underlying heart disease. Propofol was used in 121 procedures. Etomidate was used 15 times for induction and three times for both induction and maintenance in patients with ASA status 4 or low blood pressure before induction. CONCLUSION: Total intravenous anesthesia and spontaneous assisted ventilation is a well-suited technique for IRB. Severe hypoxemia, however, may occur in approximately 15 percent of patients. This complication is usually related to the procedure itself and is easy to reverse. Propofol is well tolerated in the majority of patients but it must be used with care in patients with poor functional or cardiovascular status.

Adolescent↗