PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Angiography, Digital Subtraction”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography: which modality is superior in evaluating living kidney donors?

This study evaluates the correlation of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with the operative vessel findings in living kidney donors. The intraoperative vessel findings of 52 living renal donors were compared with the preoperative diagnoses of each imaging technique. Sixty-seven arteries were found during explantation. Forty kidneys showed a single arterial blood supply, and 12 kidneys showed a multiple arterial blood supply. No advantage of either imaging method was found for arterial imaging. There were 55 veins identified during organ harvesting. MRA could not determine the venous system in one donor (1.9%) and failed to detect one small pole vein in another. DSA did not yield a venous diagnosis in seven patients (13.5%) and yielded misdiagnoses in four patients. The correct diagnosis of renal donor veins differed significantly in favor of MRA (kappa 0.79 vs. 0.45; P=0.008). MRA is superior to DSA in assessing the renal vasculature in living kidney donors.

Angiography↗
PubMed1982

Evaluation of potential renal donors and renal allograft recipients: digital video subtraction angiography.

Digital video subtraction angiography is a safe, easily performed, outpatient procedure that was applied to evaluating the arterial anatomy of 11 potential renal donors and 22 examinations of 19 renal allograft recipients. Digital intravenous angiography depicted the number and position of renal arteries preoperatively in renal donors and excluded renal arterial or parenchymal disease. It accurately defined transplant arterial stenoses and demonstrated the status of the intrarenal circulation. No morbidity nor decreased renal function resulted. Digital video subtraction angiography has become the procedure of choice for these referrals at this institution.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Low-dose, high-frame-rate versus regular-dose, low-frame-rate digital subtraction angiography.

Using intravenous digital subtraction angiography for carotid, cerebral, and renal arteries, a comparison was made between a single pulsed image and an integrated image composed of several pulsed images. The single image was generated with a conventional detected dose per frame while the frames composing the integrated image were generated at a lower dose per frame but at a higher frame rate. Comparisons were made for an equivalent detected dose per image. For relatively stationary arteries, the integrated images were equivalent or superior to the single images. When patient motion was present, or if pulsatile vessel motion was significant, the single image was better than the integrated image. A low-dose, high-frame-rate technique has the potential for furnishing physiologic data in addition to high-quality morphologic information.

Angiography↗
PubMed1986

[Value of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography].

Among 3000 digital subtraction angiographies which have been performed in our institute, 850 patients have been examined intraarterially. The advantage of i.a. DSA is due to the excellent demonstration of vessels in survey angiograms by small amounts of contrast medium (10-20 ml in the aorta), without risk of selective catheterisation into the neck vessels, the saving of expensive film series, the short duration of vessel examinations and the small complication rate. I.a. DSA can be carried out on outpatients also, using the 4/5 F-catheter, which saves hospital charges. Impressive examples show the advantages of i.a. DSA.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR angiography is primarily and increasingly used to assess intracranial arterial stenoocclusion. However, MR angiography can cause overestimation of stenosis. Although CT angiography is accurate, it has limitations. Our purpose was to determine whether the accuracy of combined MR angiography and CT angiography is equal to that of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in measuring stenosis and detecting major intracranial arterial occlusion. METHODS: CT angiography and intraarterial DSA were prospectively performed in 18 patients with suspected intracranial stenoocclusive disease, as revealed with MR angiography. Before DSA, two reviewers independently assessed MR intracranial angiograms. Subsequently, they assessed CT angiograms with MR angiograms. Results were compared with DSA results. The degree of stenoocclusion was categorized; stenosis of 50% or more indicated stenoocclusive disease. After the blinded study, two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the angiographic findings. RESULTS: Stenoocclusive disease was identified in 18 of 198 intracranial arteries at DSA. MR angiography had a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 91%, and an accuracy of 91% for the identification of stenosis of 50% or more; the addition of CT angiography yielded values of 100%, 99%, and 99%, respectively. Stenotic grades with combined CT angiography and MR angiography agreed with those of DSA in 98% of cases. In the retrospective study, CT angiography did not always correctly delineate arterial lumina with circumferential calcification and cavernous portions of the internal carotid artery. CONCLUSION: In this investigation, the evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive diseases in major intracranial arteries, the accuracy of combined MR angiography and CT angiography is equal to that of DSA in most cases.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Contrast media nephropathy: intravenous CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in renal artery stenosis: a prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) is a noninvasive method to diagnose renal artery stenosis (RAS). In digital subtraction angiography (DSA), contrast media (CM) is injected directly into the renal artery; in CTA, a greater amount of CM is injected intravenously, potentially leading to an increased incidence of CM nephropathy. METHODS: We investigated 80 patients with suspected RAS randomized to either CTA or DSA prospectively. The following parameters were determined: serum creatinine level and single-shot inulin clearance for evaluation of renal function and urine alpha1-microglobulin and beta-N-acetyl-glucoseaminidase (beta-NAG) as markers for tubular toxicity. Data from 16 patients undergoing angioplasty in the same session were excluded. RESULTS: In the CTA and DSA groups, 163 +/- 13 and 104 +/- 56 mL of CM (mean +/- SD; P < 0.0001) were administered, respectively. Mean serum creatinine levels increased from 1.78 +/- 1.61 to 1.92 +/-1.73 mg/dL (157 +/- 142 to 170 +/- 153 micromol/L; P = 0.00001) in the CTA group and from 1.52 +/- 1.23 to 1.60 +/- 1.28 mg/dL (134 +/- 109 to 141 +/- 113 micromol/L; P = 0.01) in the DSA group. Mean inulin clearance decreased from 63 +/- 28 to 58 +/- 23 mL/min (P = 0.01) and 65 +/- 26 to 62 +/- 26 mL/min (P < 0.01), median beta-NAG levels increased from 4.6 to 6.0 U/g creatinine (P = not significant) and 2.5 to 8.0 U/g creatinine (P < 0.001), and median alpha1-microglobulin levels increased from 13 to 17 microg/g creatinine (P < 0.025) and 11 to 21 microg/g creatinine (P = not significant) in the CTA and DSA groups, respectively. CM nephropathy occurred in 3 of 33 patients in the CTA group and 2 of 31 patients in the DSA group. The increase in creatinine level was reversible in all patients within 7 days. CONCLUSION: On this study, CTA performed for the detection of RAS is not associated with an increased risk for CM nephropathy compared with intraarterial DSA despite a greater dose of CM.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Renovascular arterial hypertension. Importance of subtraction digital angiography in its diagnosis].

The authors describe the material and the use method of intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IVDSA) before presenting the obtained results. The morphologic abnormalities of the renal arteries evidenced in 105 patients, are distributed by different pathologies such as: atherosclerosis 48 patients; fibromuscular dysplasia 27 patients; Takayasu's aortoarteritis 8 patients (7.6%); renal artery aneurysms 5 patients (4.8%); renal arterial emboli 1 patient (0.9%); iatrogenic 6 patients (5.7%); small kidney/hypoplastic renal artery 10 patients (9.5%). The authors draw also attention to an anatomic variant-the early bifurcation of the renal artery that should be evaluated under the pathophysiologic point of view. From this experience some conclusions emerge. The IVDSA permits the ambulatory screening of the renal arteries abnormalities with additive value in the cost/benefit ratio, that is translated in the increasing number of hypertensive patients who are identified as having renal artery abnormalities. The pathologies more frequently identified are the atherosclerotic in the old male and the fibromuscular dysplasia in the young female. The pathophysiologic significance of the early bifurcation of the renal artery needs further elucidation. According to the authors experience, the IVDSA has a paramount position and can even be the first test to be performed in the workup diagnostic approach to the hypertensive patient with moderate and strong suspection of RVH.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Internal carotid artery stenosis measurement: comparison of 3D computed rotational angiography and conventional digital subtraction angiography.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical trials have shown that carotid endarterectomy reduces stroke risk in symptomatic individuals with severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. As a result of these trials, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) became a standard of reference for ICA stenosis diagnosis. Newer 3D techniques provide a larger number of views than DSA, which may influence the estimated degree of stenosis. We evaluate this possibility by directly comparing stenosis grades from 3D computed rotational angiography (CRA) and DSA. METHODS: As a prospective diagnostic study, we performed CRA and DSA on 26 consecutive symptomatic patients. Only 1 angiographic procedure was performed on normal asymptomatic arteries, yielding 42 arteries for comparison. Four neuroradiologists graded the CRA maximum intensity projections (MIPs) and DSA images, according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial guidelines. CRA studies included a search for the narrowest view by evaluating 60 MIPs generated at 3 degrees intervals and measurement of actual artery diameters. Artery diameters and stenosis grades were analyzed graphically; statistical significance was determined using a paired t test. RESULTS: The mean difference of 1.2% (CI, -18%, 21%) between CRA and DSA stenosis grades was not statistically significant (P=0.55). Agreement of the optimal CRA viewing angle was limited, with an interobserver variability of 24+/-13 degrees . The interobserver variability of DSA and CRA stenosis grades, 9.1% (CI, 0%, 21%) and 9.4% (CI, 0%, 22%), respectively, was not significantly different (P=0.79). CONCLUSIONS: CRA provides stenosis grades equivalent to DSA, as well as absolute measurements, providing a comparison for newer 3D techniques.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

[Renovascular arterial hypertension. Importance of subtraction digital angiography in its diagnosis].

The objective of this study is to contribute to the positioning of the intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IVDSA) in the detection of morphologic abnormalities of renal arteries (RAs), susceptible to originate renovascular hypertension (RVH). The authors focus on the prevalence of RVH in the broad spectrum of systemic arterial hypertension. The definition of RVH is given and its diagnostic criteria are revisited. The angiography methods used in the evaluation of RAs morphologic abnormalities are described.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗
PubMed1996

Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether spiral CT angiography allows accurate, quantitative evaluation of anatomic abnormalities, including detection of additional lesions, delineation of plaque morphology, and estimation of degree of internal carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: Spiral CT angiography with a maximum intensity projection technique was compared with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in 92 carotid arteries. The category of stenosis was determined according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: mild (0% to 29%), moderate (30% to 69%), severe (70% to 99%), and occlusion (100%). RESULTS: In 78 (85%) of the 92 cases, spiral CT angiography and selective DSA demonstrated the same degree of stenosis. All occlusions (n = 19) were diagnosed correctly with spiral CT angiography. Spiral CT angiography agreed with selective DSA in the classification of stenosis in 59% of the group with mild stenosis, in 82% of the group with moderate stenosis, and in 90% of the group with severe stenosis. In the groups with mild (n = 13), moderate (n = 9), and severe (n = 27) stenosis, correlation of spiral CT angiography with selective DSA was significant. Calcified plaques were readily diagnosed with the use of spiral CT angiography but delineation of ulcers was poor. Tandem lesions were not visible owing to the limited coverage. CONCLUSION: Spiral CT angiography is useful for the detection of proximal internal carotid stenoses that are greater than 30%. Depiction of mild stenoses appears to be limited. CT is superior for the detection of calcified plaques but it is not useful for the detection of ulcers.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is generally considered to overestimate the degree of stenosis in the internal carotid artery (ICA) in comparison with the reference standard intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA). We evaluated whether the degree of stenosis was more accurately assessed with 3D TOF MRA if corresponding projections on MRA and DSA were compared instead of comparison of maximal stenosis at MRA with maximal stenosis at DSA. METHODS: From February 1997 to December 1999, we included 186 symptomatic and 17 asymptomatic consecutive patients suspected of having carotid artery stenosis on the basis of clinical presentation and screening with duplex ultrasound scan examination. All patients subsequently underwent DSA and MRA imaging. From each ICA, 12 maximum intensity projections with 3D TOF MRA and two or three projections with DSA were obtained. First, we compared the maximal stenosis at MRA with the maximal stenosis at DSA. Subsequently, we used the stenosis at MRA measured on the projection corresponding with the DSA projection that showed the maximal stenosis. For both strategies, the mean differences in stenosis and sensitivity and specificity for assessment of severe stenosis (70% to 99%) were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The MRA and DSA images of 354 ICAs could be compared. The sensitivity and specificity of MRA with the projection that showed the maximal stenosis were 92.6% (95% CI, 85.3% to 97.0%) and 82.7% (95% CI, 78.1% to 87.3%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity with the MRA projection, corresponding with the DSA projection showing the maximal stenosis, were 88.3% (95% CI, 81.8% to 94.8%) and 89.6% (95% CI, 85.9% to 93.3%), respectively. The mean difference between maximal stenosis at MRA and DSA was 7.5% (95% CI, 5.2% to 9.9%). The mean difference between stenosis at MRA and DSA in corresponding projections was 0.4% (95% CI, -2.0% to 2.7%). CONCLUSION: If corresponding MRA and intraarterial DSA projections are compared, 3D TOF MRA does not overestimate carotid stenosis.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Evaluation of left ventricular performance using digital subtraction angiography.

Cardiac applications for digital subtraction angiography appear promising, but few correlative studies with contrast ventriculography have been done. Left ventricular volume, ejection fraction, and regional wall motion by digital subtraction angiography were evaluated after intravenous injection of 40 ml of iodinated contrast medium and after left ventricular injection of 5 to 10 ml of contrast medium. A film-based system of the authors' own design was used. Results were compared with those after direct left ventricular injection of 40 ml of contrast medium. The ventriculograms after intravenous injection were of diagnostic quality in 9 of 12 studies, and there were close correlations between intravenous and direct-injection studies for left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.89, n = 9, and p = 0.001) and for left ventricular volume (r = 0.91, n = 18, and p less than 0.001). Regional wall motion scores showed close correspondence in 83% of sectors. After small-volume left ventricular injections, the ventricular image was enhanced considerably by digital subtraction. Correlations between small- and large-volume ventriculograms were close for left ventricular ejection fraction (r = 0.91, n = 8, and p = 0.002) and for left ventricular volume (r = 0.96, n = 16, and p less than 0.001). There was close correspondence of wall motion scores in 87% of sectors. Thus, digital subtraction angiography improves the visibility of the left ventricle after either intravenous or small-volume direct left ventricular injection. Digital images produce excellent estimates of left ventricular volume and should have considerable usefulness for the study of cardiac performance and anatomy.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for assessment of aortoiliac occlusive disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of CT angiography (CTA) with a single helical acquisition for assessment of stenoses and occlusions of the iliac arteries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In our prospective study, intraarterial digital subtraction angiography and IV CTA were performed from the suprarenal aorta to below the femoral bifurcation in 30 patients with vascular occlusive disease. Maximum-intensity-projection images in multiple views were also obtained. The accuracy of CTA with and without analysis of axial images was determined. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of CTA were 100% for iliac artery occlusions with a confidence interval 85-100% and 97-100%, respectively. When axial scans were interpreted, 14 of 15 high-grade (> 75%) stenoses were recognized. Sensitivity and specificity of CTA were 93% (range, 68-100%) and 99% (range, 97-100%), respectively. When maximum intensity projections alone were analyzed, sensitivity for the diagnosis of 15 high-grade stenoses was only 53% (range, 27-79%) because calcified plaques obscured six stenoses. CONCLUSIONS: CTA accurately reveals iliac artery occlusions. Observers of CT angiograms may overlook short stenoses in rare instances. Calcified plaques limit the use of maximum-intensity-projection images.

Angiography↗
PubMed1982

Digital subtraction pulmonary angiography.

Digital subtraction pulmonary angiography was performed in 14 patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism. In 13 of 14, useful clinical information was obtained. Four patients were found to have pulmonary emboli. In nine patients, digital subtraction angiography was performed through pulmonary artery catheters already in place for monitoring critically ill patients. Conventional angiography in nine patients confirmed the findings by digital angiography. This initial experience suggests that digital subtraction pulmonary angiography provides adequate image quality in certain circumstances with several advantages over conventional angiography.

Angiography↗
PubMed1982

Quantitation of left ventricular dimensions and function by digital video subtraction angiography.

Digital video subtraction angiography (DVSA) after central intravenous administration of contrast media was used in experimental animals and in patients with suspected coronary artery disease to quantitate left ventricular dimensions and regional and global contractile function. In animals, measurements of left ventricular (LV) volumes, wall thickness, ejection fraction, segmental contraction, and cardiac output correlated closely with sonocardiometry or thermodilution measurements. In patients, volumes and ejection fractions calculated from mask mode digital images correlated closely with direct left ventriculography. Global and segmental contractile function was displayed in patients by ejection shell images, stroke volume images, and time interval difference images. Central cardiovascular function was also quantitated by measurement of pulmonary transit time and calculation of pulmonary blood volume from digital fluoroscopic images. DVSA was shown to be useful and accurate in the quantitation of central cardiovascular physiology.

Angiocardiography↗
PubMed1996

Anatomic evaluation of the circle of Willis: MR angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability of source images and maximum intensity projection images of MR angiography in showing the arterial segments of the circle of Willis. METHODS: In 62 patients, 526 arterial segments of the circle of Willis were determined to be present, partially present, or absent by blinded observers evaluating MR angiographic source images and maximum intensity projection images. Vessel diameter was measured on source images. These results were then compared with the results from intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. RESULTS: MR angiographic maximum intensity projection images had a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 88% and MR angiographic source images had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 63% in depicting the presence of a vessel segment. The positive predictive value of an arterial segment with a diameter of at least 1 mm was 99%. CONCLUSION: MR angiography is a sensitive technique for detecting the anatomy of the circle of Willis. Maximum intensity projection images are more specific than source images. An arterial segment with a diameter of at least 1 mm on the source image is almost always present and patent.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1983

Transluminal angioplasty: late results sustained by digital intravenous subtraction angiography.

Digital intravenous subtraction angiography (DIVSA) appears to be a technique of minimal invasiveness and high accuracy in the follow-up of patients after percutaneous angioplasty (PTA) allowing correct angiographic evaluation in more than 96% of the cases. Correlation between clinical and angiographic findings seems to be excellent. Of the controlled intravenous examinations performed in 54 successful PTA procedures 75% appeared patent after 10 to 30 months, constituting 52% of the original attempts.

Angiography↗