PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Aortic Dissection”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Percutaneous balloon-expandable stents for sealing of acute aortic dissection.

Acute aortic dissection is a highly lethal disease. When dissection involves only the descending aorta and there are no ischemic complications, medical management may be the treatment of choice. However, a high risk of expansion or rupture of the dissection remains. When renal or limb ischemic complications do appear, surgery has been the only option, despite high mortality and morbidity. Percutaneous placement of stents for sealing an acute aortic dissection might be an alternative to surgical treatment. We treated 2 patients with acute type B aortic dissection by stent-fixation of the proximal and distal descending aorta. In both patients, there was evidence of persistent flap fixation at midterm follow-up.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1990

Dissection of the aorta and dissecting aortic aneurysms. Improving early and long-term surgical results.

We report the improving surgical results in a consecutive series of 690 patients referred to one of us (E.S.C.) for aortic dissection between December 1956 and September 1989, a substantial portion of whom had dissection as a complication of either previous aortic (n = 113, 16) or previous cardiac (n = 54, 8%) operation. Our initial operation of choice in patients requiring multiple operations in this group of 690 patients was based on the most life-threatening or symptomatic aortic segment involved, which was ascending aorta and/or aortic arch (Asc/Arch) in 301 (44%) patients, descending thoracic aorta (Desc) in 195 (28%) patients, and thoracoabdominal aorta (TaA) in 194 (28%) patients. As detailed below, considerable improvement occurred in the 30-day survival rates over time, particularly for acute dissection: [table; see text] The independent determinants of both early and long-term mortality were identified. Independent determinants of late fatal rupture, reoperation, and neuromuscular dysfunction for distal dissectors were also identified. In our experience, continued aggressive surgical intervention for aortic dissection with modern operative techniques has resulted in markedly improved 30-day operative survival (approaching 95% including those patients with acute dissection) and significant improvement in late results.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Endovascular repair of descending aortic dissections.

Endoluminal aortic stent-grafts have revolutionized the contemporary management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The application of this treatment option for aortic dissections has been hampered by the difficult anatomic constraints frequently encountered with both acute and chronic forms of the disease. Although the data are sparse, it is rapidly growing as technologic advances are made in the design and delivery of various stent-grafts. Reviewed is our current understanding of the pathophysiology of descending thoracic aortic dissections, available stent-graft designs, techniques of implantation, and alternatives for complex anatomy. The section concludes with an overview of published data on stent-graft repair of both acute and chronic aortic dissections.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1991

[Familial dissecting aortic aneurysm].

A family is described in which two brothers (44 and 48 years old) had aortic dissecting aneurysms (the first one died, the other one underwent surgical treatment and is still living) in the absence of clinical features of Marfan syndrome and of systemic hypertension. Two of the six living siblings have aortic dilation on echocardiography. Histologic examination of the aortic wall at autopsy or surgery revealed a loss of elastic fibers, deposition of mucopolysaccaride-like material and medionecrosis. We can postulate a genetically-determined disease of connective tissue usually described as "Marfan's forme fruste".

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Intravenous esmolol in acute aortic dissection.

Acute aortic dissection is a devastating condition requiring prompt intensive pharmacologic management geared toward control of blood pressure and reduction in myocardial contractility (change in velocity/change in time). The treatment of choice currently is sodium nitroprusside and intravenous propranolol hydrochloride. During acute aortic dissection, hemorrhage may spread into the interatrial septum, extending to the atrioventricular junctional tissues, thus causing conduction abnormalities. Adverse effects of long-acting beta-blockers, including bradycardia, heart failure, and bronchospasm, may limit their usefulness because these effects persist for a long time after discontinuation. This may be detrimental, especially in patients with compromised cardiac function, bronchospastic disease, or both. We report a case of a 64-year-old woman with compromised cardiac function and aortic dissection who was successfully treated with esmolol hydrochloride (an ultrashort-acting beta-blocker) and sodium nitroprusside.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1993

[Dissecting aortic aneurysm complicated by rupture of the right coronary artery and acute myocardial infarction--in a person treated with fibrinolysis].

A case report of 45-year-old woman with acute inferior wall and right ventricle myocardial infarction treated with i.v. Streptokinase is presented. Few days later acute aortic dissection involving right coronary artery was detected. After six days the patient was successfully operated. She is in good condition 10 months afterwards.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1994

Surgical treatment for acute aortic dissection and coexistent degenerative aortic aneurysm. Report of three cases.

Acute aortic dissection occurring in an aorta previously afflicted with degenerative, atherosclerotic is unusual. We report three cases with acute aortic dissection (DeBakey type III-b) occurring in an aorta which had a preexistent degenerative aortic aneurysm. Two of the three patients had acute aortic dissection originating from the distal end of the degenerative aneurysm, and the remaining one had the acute aortic dissection and degenerative aneurysm at different segments of the aorta. Since the risk of rupture is likely to be much higher in the patients with coexistence of acute aortic dissection and degenerative aortic aneurysm, compared with patients with DeBakey type III acute aortic dissection alone, we believe that a prompt and aggressive surgical approach is essential to prevent rupture, and that digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is more helpful in making a correct diagnosis and in helping to decide surgical procedures and supportive methods than other noninvasive diagnostic procedures.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Acute renal insufficiency in patients after surgical treatment of dissecting aortic aneurysm].

The retrospective analysis was performed of 26 patients (5 women and 21 men), mean age of 47.04 years, surgically treated for aortic dissecting aneurysm (ADA) at the Clinic of Cardiosurgery of the M.M.A. in the period 1988-1990. In the postoperative course acute renal insufficiency (ARI) has developed in 13 (50%) patients: of milder form in 5 (38.4%), medium in 6 (46.1%) and advanced form in 2 (15.3%) patients. The most common precipitating factor in development of ARI has been arterial hypotension (92.3%). In all patients including the patients treated by hemodialysis, it has come to complete recovery of renal function.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed2006

Long-term survival in patients presenting with type A acute aortic dissection: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD).

BACKGROUND: Earlier studies evaluating long-term survival in type A acute aortic dissection (TA-AAD) have been restricted to a small number of patients in single center experiences. We used data from a contemporary, multi-center international registry of TA-AAD patients to better understand factors associated with long-term survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 303 consecutive patients with TA-AAD enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) between 1996 and 2003. We included patients who were discharged alive and had documented clinical follow-up data. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to depict cumulative survival in patients from date of hospital discharge. Stepwise Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of follow-up mortality. We found that 273 (90.1%) patients had been managed surgically and 30 (9.9%) were managed medically. Patients who were dead at follow-up were more likely to be older (63.9 versus 58.4 years, P=0.007) and to have had previous cardiac surgery (23.9% versus 10.6%, P=0.01). Survival for patients treated with surgery was 96.1%+/-2.4% and 90.5%+/-3.9% at 1 and 3 years versus 88.6%+/-12.2% and 68.7%+/-19.8% without surgery (mean follow-up overall, 2.8 years, log rank P=0.009). Multivariate analysis identified a history of atherosclerosis (relative risk (RR), 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 4.37; P=0.03) and previous cardiac surgery (RR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.16 to 5.57; P=0.02) as significant, independent predictors of follow-up mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary 1- and 3-year survival in patients with TA-AAD treated surgically are excellent. Independent predictors of survival during the follow-up period do not appear to be influenced by in-hospital risks but rather preexisting comorbidities.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1991

Preservation of aortic valve in type A aortic dissection complicated by aortic regurgitation.

Two hundred fifty-two patients underwent operation for type A aortic dissection at Stanford University Medical Center from 1963 to 1987 and Duke University Medical Center from 1975 to 1988. Sixty-seven percent had an acute type A dissection and 33% had a chronic type A dissection. In addition to repair or replacement of the ascending aorta, 121 patients (48%) required an aortic valve procedure. Valve resuspension was performed in 46 (39 acute type A and 7 chronic type A), with an operative mortality rate of 13% +/- 5% (+/- 70% confidence limits), and aortic valve replacement in 75 (36 acute type A and 39 chronic type A), with an operative mortality rate of 20% +/- 5% (p = not significant versus resuspension). The operative mortality rate for patients requiring only repair or replacement of the ascending aorta was 32% +/- 4%. Indications for valve replacement included coexistent (nonacute) aortic valve disease, Marfan's syndrome, annuloaortic ectasia, and cases in which successful resuspension could not be accomplished. The overall actuarial survival rate for all patients was 59% +/- 3% (+/- 1 standard error of the mean), 40% +/- 4%, and 25% +/- 5% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Survival rates at these same times for patients with valve resuspension were 67% +/- 8%, 52% +/- 10%, and 26% +/- 19%, respectively; for patients who required aortic valve replacement, these survival rates were 70% +/- 5%, 39% +/- 8%, and 21% +/- 11%; finally, patients who received only an ascending aortic procedure had survival probabilities of 51% +/- 5%, 37% +/- 6%, and 23% +/- 6% (p = not significant versus resuspension versus aortic valve replacement). Multivariate analysis showed advanced age (p less than 0.001), previous cardiac or aortic operation (p less than 0.001), more preoperative dissection complications (p = 0.002), and earlier operative date (p = 0.038) to be the only significant, independent factors that increased the likelihood of early or late death. The type of aortic valve procedure (resuspension versus aortic valve replacement versus none) was not a significant predictor of mortality. Two of 46 patients with valve resuspension required late aortic valve replacement (freedom from aortic valve replacement: 100% and 80% +/- 13% at 5 and 10 years, respectively), as did 4 of 75 patients with initial aortic valve replacement (freedom from repeat aortic valve replacement: 98% +/- 2% and 73% +/- 13%, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

[A case report of chronic dissecting aortic aneurysm (Stanford type A) with circumferential detachment of the intima].

A 57-year-old man underwent Bentall's procedure (Piehler's modification) and partial aortic arch replacement for Stanford type A chronic aortic dissection. Circumferential detachment of intima with intimal intussusception into the aortic arch was found at the time of operation. Preoperative findings did not show the intimal tear involving entire circumference of the ascending aorta. He was asymptomatic but coughing before consulting our hospital. He was discharged from the hospital 26 days after operation.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed2006

[Emergency small-sized stent placement following aortic true lumen obliteration of Stanford type B acute aortic dissection].

Acute aortic obstruction induced by acute aortic dissection frequently causes life-threatening organ ischemia. Although early reperfusion of lower extremities, renal and mesenteric artery is necessary, surgical treatment such as graft replacement is invasive and may result in myonephropathic-metabolic syndrome (MNMS), which leads to loss of limb and life. We herein report a case of stent placement as a less invasive treatment for true lumen obliteration associated with Stanford type B aortic dissection in a patient with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis. Ten mm metallic stents were placed in the obliterated true lumen of the descending aorta in order to perfuse peripheral organs within 5 hours after occurrence. It relieved symptoms of visceral organ and leg ischemia. On the postoperative day 14, abdominal discomfort after meal, hypertension in the upper extremity and headache appeared. Chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed stenosis of the true lumen proximal to the stents. On the other hand, the diameter of the true lumen was inversely dilated distal to the stents. Bilateral axillo-femoral artery bypass was performed with relief of upper extremity hypertension and visceral organ ischemia. The patient otherwise had an uneventful course and was discharged on the postoperative day 37. Our experience suggests that emergency stent placement can provide an option that is less invasive, more effective and prompt treatment for patients with visceral organ and leg ischemia resulting from acute aortic dissection.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed2005

Acute cardiovascular collapse after pericardial drainage in a patient with aortic dissection.

Proximal aortic dissection is frequently associated with cardiac tamponade. The treatment sometimes is difficult. We present a 69-year-old female patient who after repeated episodes of syncope received an open drainage of pericardial effusion that ended in a fatal outcome. She was also known to have mural thrombi in the aorta. However, preanesthetic trransesophageal echocardiography revealed besides pericardial effusion, also dilatation of aortic root which compressed both atria. She developed sudden cardiovascular collapse following drainage of pericardial effusion to which she succumbed in spite of vigorous resuscitation. We suggest that the patients with cardiac tamponade complicated by aortic dissection must receive direct aortic repair together with intraoperative pericardial drainage. Selective or single pericardiocentesis should better be avoided.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2003

Clinical profiles and outcomes of acute type B aortic dissection in the current era: lessons from the International Registry of Aortic Dissection (IRAD).

BACKGROUND: Clinical profiles and outcomes of patients with acute type B aortic dissection have not been evaluated in the current era. METHODS AND RESULTS: Accordingly, we analyzed 384 patients (65+/-13 years, males 71%) with acute type B aortic dissection enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). A majority of patients had hypertension and presented with acute chest/back pain. Only one-half showed abnormal findings on chest radiograph, and almost all patients had computerized tomography (CT), transesophageal echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and/or aortogram to confirm the diagnosis. In-hospital mortality was 13% with most deaths occurring within the first week. Factors associated with increased in-hospital mortality on univariate analysis were hypotension/shock, widened mediastinum, periaortic hematoma, excessively dilated aorta (>or=6 cm), in-hospital complications of coma/altered consciousness, mesenteric/limb ischemia, acute renal failure, and surgical management (all P<0.05). A risk prediction model with control for age and gender showed hypotension/shock (odds ratio [OR] 23.8, P<0.0001), absence of chest/back pain on presentation (OR 3.5, P=0.01), and branch vessel involvement (OR 2.9, P=0.02), collectively named 'the deadly triad' to be independent predictors of in-hospital death. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides insight into current-day profiles and outcomes of acute type B aortic dissection. Factors associated with increased in-hospital mortality ("the deadly triad") should be identified and taken into consideration for risk stratification and decision-making.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

MR angiographic evaluation of complications in surgically treated type A aortic dissection.

Thoracic aortic dissection is a life-threatening disease with a high mortality rate and an elevated incidence of early and long-term complications. Advances in surgical treatment of ascending (Stanford type A) aortic dissection have helped improve patient survival, but follow-up imaging is critically important for the identification of postsurgical complications. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, along with multisection computed tomography, is the technique of choice for this purpose. For accurate assessment of 3D MR angiograms, it is important to know what surgical procedure was performed and to be familiar with the appearance of the normal postsurgical anatomy. A thorough understanding of potential postsurgical complications also is essential. Some complications (eg, formation of a periprosthetic hematoma or pseudoaneurysm, stenosis in a graft anastomosis) may derive from the prosthesis. Complications also may occur in the remnant of the native aorta, where persistent dissection distal to the prosthesis is common and may result in false channel thrombosis or aneurysmatic dilatation with collapse of the true lumen. Residual dissection that involves the supra-aortic trunks or the visceral aortic branches may produce neurologic effects or renal and mesenteric ischemia, respectively.

Aortic Dissection↗
PubMed1998

Supravalvular aortic stenosis in aortic dissection.

Supravalvular aortic stenosis is a rare complication of aortic dissection. We report on echocardiographic and magnetic resonance observations in 2 cases of aortic dissection with false lumen thrombosis of the ascending aorta and severe narrowing of the true lumen.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

[Management of patients with closing aortic dissection].

Acute aortic dissection is a catastrophic event requiring immediate diagnosis and definitive treatment, while the clinical characteristics of closing aortic dissection are not well known. From Jan. 1991 through Dec. 1994 a total of 24 patients with closing aortic dissection (CAD) was managed at our institution. There were 19 men and 5 women, ranging in age from 49 to 74 years with a mean of 65 years. All patients presented with a sudden onset of severe chest and back pain. Twenty patients had a history of hypertension with a wide mediastinal silhouette on chest X-ray. The diagnosis of CAD was established by contrast computed tomographic (CT) scans in all patients with no evidence of patent false lumen. The descending thoracic aorta was involved in 17 patients and the ascending in 5. Conservative medical management was initially attempted for all. Seven patients (Stanford type A/B: 2/5) ultimately required surgical intervention, and 2 patients died. The follow-up was 100% complete with a mean term of 14.6 months. The overall survival rate was 74% at 3 years after the initial presentation. Based on our clinical experience, all patients with CAD need careful antihypertensive therapy and frequent follow-up studies to assess the aorta.

Aged↗