SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colorectal Surgery”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

Nosocomial infections are the most frequent complications observed in surgical patients. In colorectal surgery, the opening of the viscera causes the dissemination into the operative field of microorganisms originating from endogenous sources, increasing the chance of developing postoperative complications. It is reported that without antibiotic prophylaxis, wound infection after colorectal surgery develops in approximately 40% of patients. This percentage decreases to approximately 11% after antibiotic prophylaxis. Specific criteria in the choice of correct antibiotic prophylaxis have to be respected, on the basis of the microorganisms usually found in the surgical site, and on the specific hospital microbiologic epidemiology.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed1994

[Nonelective colorectal surgery. Does age determine the results?].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of age on the morbi-mortality after non-elective colorectal surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SUBJECTS: 150 consecutive patients who underwent non-elective colorectal surgery between 1986 and 1992 [65 patients aged under 70 years (Group I)] and 85 patients aged 70 years or over (Group II)]. RESULTS: Using multiple regression analysis we have found: 1) Mortality is determined by the presence of associated risk factors (p < 0.001 tv = 4.11), the presence of peritonitis (p < 0.05 tv = 2.08) and by the admission-operation interval (p < 0.05 tv = 2.10). 2) Overall morbidity increases with age (p < 0.01, tv = 3.22) and the benign nature of the colorectal disease (p < 0.05, tv = 2.00). CONCLUSION: Age does not influence mortality in non-elective colorectal surgery even though it is a determinant risk factor in morbidity increase.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2000

Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: early postoperative results of a prospective study involving 116 patients. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group.

PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic colorectal surgery is attracting ever more attention, its use for curative treatment of colorectal carcinoma in particular continues to be controversial. The present study was an attempt to analyze the results of the perioperative course, oncologic quality, and preliminary long-term results. METHOD: The data considered here were collected within the framework of a prospective, observational study initiated on August 1, 1995, and involving a total of 18 institutions in Germany and Austria. At the end of three years, the results are now being presented selectively, i.e., focusing only on abdominoperineal resection. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resections, 98 (84.5 percent) of which were performed with curative intent. The mean operating time was 226 (confidence interval, 140-365) minutes. Seven patients (6 percent) experienced an intraoperative complication, which in more than one-half of the cases was a vascular injury involving the presacral venous plexus; the conversion rate was 3.4 percent. Postoperatively, 40 patients developed 97 complications--including those of a very minor nature--giving an overall morbidity rate of 34.4 percent. Reoperation in six patients (5.2 percent) had to be performed for an afterbleed in one-half of the cases and ileus in the other one-half. Postoperative mortality was a low 1.7 percent. In most of the curative resections, an oncologically radical operation with high transection of the inferior mesenteric artery and a complete dissection of the pelvis down to the floor was performed. The median number of lymph nodes investigated was 11.5, and there was wide fluctuation in the numbers among the individual institutions. Tumor cell dissemination occurred intraoperatively in five patients. In the meantime, 79 patients (81 percent) underwent at least one follow-up examination, the mean follow-up period being 491 days. Seven patients developed a local recurrence, and a further six patients developed distant metastases. For recurrence-free survival rate, the Kaplan-Meier estimation calculated a probability of 71 percent. CONCLUSION: Not all of the reservations about laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection, in particular with regard to resection with curative intent, have yet been eliminated. The present study does, however, show that a laparoscopic approach can in principle meet oncologic requirements of radicality and, with regard to the postoperative course, is associated with considerable benefits to the patient.

Abdomen↗

PubMed1997

Preoperative total parenteral nutrition influences postoperative systemic cytokine responses after colorectal surgery.

Previous human studies have investigated the influences of nutritional routes on the serum kinetics of cytokines following intravenous administration of lipopolysaccharide. However, it is unclear whether preoperative nutritional routes influence responses of systemic cytokines in patients after surgery. This study was designed to investigate whether preoperative total parental nutrition (TPN) influences systemic interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) responses in patients following surgery for colorectal cancer. Patients with colorectal cancer received TPN (TPN group, n = 6) or an oral diet (oral group n = 6) for more than 7 d before the operation. Patients in the TPN group received standard TPN. Patients in the oral group received an ordinary hospital diet. Blood samples were collected before the operation, on postoperative day 1 (POD1), POD3, and POD7. Levels of IL-6, IL-8, and C-reactive protein (CRP) in plasma were determined. The characteristics of patients in the TPN and oral groups were comparable. Mean carbohydrate intake was greater (28 versus 19 kCal/kg), and lipid intake was smaller (0 versus 7 kCal/kg) in the TPN group than in the oral group. Plasma CRP levels did not differ between the two groups. Plasma IL-6 and IL-8 levels were marginally higher before the operation and were significantly higher on POD1 in the TPN group than in the oral group. The IL-6 levels showed a positive regression relation with the amounts of blood loss only in the TPN group (P < 0.05, r = 0.881). The slope of the regression line was steeper in the TPN group than in the total enteral nutrition (TEN) group (P < 0.01). In conclusion, routes of nutritional supply have an impact on the production of systemic cytokines after insult. The postoperative systemic IL-6 and IL-8 responses in patients who received standard TPN preoperatively were greater than in patients who received an oral diet. Preoperative nutrition via the enteral route may provide better regulation of cytokine responses after surgery than parenteral nutrition.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗

PubMed1992

Single dose ceftriaxone as prophylaxis for sepsis in colorectal surgery.

During the period May 1986 to July 1989, a prospective, double blind, randomized trial of antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery was undertaken at the Royal Brisbane Hospital. Three hundred and thirty patients were considered eligible for the trial. Three regimens were compared: a combination of 2 g ceftriaxone and 1 g metronidazole; a single dose of 2 g ceftriaxone; or 1 g cefazolin and 1 g metronidazole, as antibacterial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery. Fifty patients were excluded from analysis. The overall incidence of wound sepsis was 7.9% (22 patients). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of wound infections between the three groups. The presence of drains and the non-performance of a bowel anastomosis at the time of surgery predisposed patients to wound infection. Staphylococcus aureus or Staphylococcus epidermidis were the cause of wound infection in 16 cases. Patients in the cefazolin and metronidazole group had a significantly higher number of postoperative urinary tract and respiratory tract infections than the other two groups combined (P less than 0.01). There did not appear to be any change in sensitivity patterns to ceftriaxone during the 3 year trial. During the 3 year period of the study, ceftriaxone was found to be a safe and effective drug in antibacterial prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

Cefazolin↗

PubMed2005

Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: For over a century the presence of bowel content during surgery has been linked to anastomotic leakage. Mechanical bowel preparation has been considered an efficient agent against leakage and infectious complications. This dogma is not based on solid evidence, but on observational data and expert's opinions. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic mechanical bowel preparation for morbidity and mortality rates in elective colorectal surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We also searched relevant medical journals, and conference proceedings from major gastroenterological congresses and contacted experts in the field. We used the search strategy described by the Colorectal Cancer Review Group, without limitations for date of publication and language. I SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised, clinical trials that compared any strategy in mechanical bowel preparation with no mechanical bowel preparation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were independently extracted by the reviewers and cross-checked. The same reviewers assessed the methodological quality of each trial. Details of the randomisation (generation and concealment), blinding, whether an intention-to-treat analysis was done, and the number of patients lost to follow-up was recorded. For analysis the Peto odds ratio (OR) was used as defaults. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1592 patients (9 trials), 789 were allocated to mechanical bowel preparation (Group A) and 803 to no preparation (Group B) before elective colorectal surgery. For anastomotic leakage (main outcome) the results were: - Low anterior resection: 9.8% (11 of 112 patients in Group A) compared with 7.5% (9 of 119 patients in Group B); Peto OR 1.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57 to 3.67 (non-significant); - Colonic surgery: 2.9% (Group A) compared with 1.6% (Group B) ; Peto OR 1.80, 95% CI: 0.68 to 4.75 (non-significant); Overall anastomotic leakage: 6.2% (Group A) compared with 3.2% (Group B); Peto OR 2.03, 95% CI: 1.276 to 3.26 (p=0.003). For the secondary outcome of wound infection the result was: 7.4% (Group A) compared with 5.4% (Group B); Peto OR 1.46, 95% CI: 0.97 - to 2.18 (p=0.07); Sensitivity analyses excluding studies with dubious randomisation, studies published as abstracts only, and studies involving children did not change the overall conclusions AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no convincing evidence that mechanical bowel preparation is associated with reduced rates of anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal surgery. On the contrary, there is evidence that this intervention may be associated with an increased rate of anastomotic leakage and wound complications. It is not possible to be conclusion on the latter issue because of the clinical heterogeneity of trial inclusion criteria, methodological inadequacies in trial (in particular, poor reporting of concealment and allocation), potential performance biases, and failure of intention-to-treat analyses. Nevertheless, the dogma that mechanical bowel preparation is necessary before elective colorectal surgery should be reconsidered.

Colorectal Surgery↗

PubMed1984

Sites of recurrent tumour after 'curative' colorectal surgery: implications for adjuvant therapy.

The pattern of recurrent tumour following 'curative' colorectal surgery was examined in a necropsy series and a prospective clinical series. In the necropsy series the commonest pattern of recurrence was disseminated disease (73 per cent) and recurrence in a single site was much less common (27 per cent). In the clinical series recurrence in a single site was commoner (55 per cent). The difference between the two series is statistically significant (P = 0.02, chi 2), and is probably due to under-diagnosis of disseminated recurrence in the clinical series. In both series local recurrence and hepatic metastases occurred almost equally but usually as part of disseminated disease. We conclude that after 'curative' surgery for colorectal cancer, recurrence is usually disseminated (73 per cent) and therefore therapy adjuvant to surgery should be active systemically. Adjuvant therapy directed at a single site (e.g. radiotherapy or intrahepatic chemotherapy) should be combined with a systemic therapy.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Core temperature changes during open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative hypothermia increases the morbidity of surgery. However, the true incidence of hypothermia during prolonged laparoscopic surgery is still unknown. To investigate this issue, we compared the temperature change between patients undergoing open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients who were undergoing laparoscopic (33) or open (27) colorectal surgery had a transesophageal temperature probe placed after induction of anesthesia. Core temperature values were measured at 15-min intervals. RESULTS: The groups were not statistically different with respect to age, sex, body surface area, or initial transesophageal temperature. The type of surgical access (open or laparoscopic) caused no difference in the incidence of hypothermia. The use of a forced-air warming device produced significantly less hypothermia during laparoscopic surgery. Men showed significantly less variability in temperature change than women. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of hypothermia in open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery is similar. Forced-air warming devices are of value in prolonged laparoscopic surgery. A gender difference in the response to a hypothermic situation has not been previously reported. This finding warrants further investigation.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Use of the greater omentum in colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Complications related to impaired healing remain a major challenge in colorectal surgery. This review examines the potentially protective role of the greater omentum in colorectal operations. METHODS: Review of all reports concerning applications of the greater omentum in colorectal surgery identified through MEDLINE (1966-1997) and other sources. RESULTS: Clinical case studies indicate that an interposition flap of omentum is beneficial in the management of complex rectal fistulas. Pelvic omentoplasty or an omental hammock appears to reduce the incidence of radiation enteropathy in patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy after rectal resection. However, recent research demonstrates that omental wrapping does not "protect" colonic or rectal anastomoses. Nor is there convincing evidence that pelvic omentoplasty promotes primary perineal healing after abdominoperineal resection for cancer, although it may reduce the incidence of perineal wound breakdown. CONCLUSIONS: Previous assumptions concerning the omentum are now being rigorously investigated with the aim of defining its true value in colorectal applications. This must be encouraged, especially where use of the omentum increases the magnitude or duration of operations significantly.

Colon↗

PubMed2004

Use of a numeric visual analog anxiety scale among patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of a Numeric Visual Analog Anxiety Scale (NVAAS) as a potentially accurate and efficient way to determine presurgery anxiety among patients undergoing colorectal surgery. A secondary aim was to determine the relationship between NVAAS ratings of anxiety and postsurgery pain. Thirty-six patients scheduled for colorectal surgery were asked to rate their state anxiety on the NVAAS and to complete the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The NVAAS correlated significantly with STAI-state anxiety (0.64, p <.0001). The NVAAS measure of presurgery anxiety also correlated significantly with STAI-trait anxiety (0.46, p <.005) and postsurgery Visual Analog Scale pain ratings (0.35, p <.038). The NVAAS appears to be a valid and sensitive measure of anxiety among patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The NVAAS also has the advantage of being convenient and easy to use at bedside, increasing its clinical utility in medical nursing care.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

[One-day bowel cleaning for colorectal surgery].

A modified one-day preoperative bowel cleaning was used in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancers. It was compared with traditional three-day bowel preparation, 48 patients without obstruction were randomized to two groups, with 24 each. Modified one-day method was used in experimental group, and traditional three-day method was used in control group. No significant changes were found in plasma electrolytes, hemoglobin end hematocrit in both groups. The intraoperative bowel cleaning condition were grade I in all patients. Bowel fluid culture was positive in 30% of the experimental patients, whereas in 70% of the contral patients. Wound infection occurred in one patient in both groups (4.2%). It is suggested that the modified one-day preoperative bowel preparation may alleviate the patients' suffering from diahrrea and homeostatic disturbances, ensure them in good sleep and rest, reduce the nursing work, and result in good bowel cleaning for operation. It is a simple, safe, and effective method for preoperative bowel cleaning.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Successful voiding after trial without catheter is not synonymous with recovery of bladder function after colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: The need for monitoring postoperative urine output and the possibility of lower urinary tract dysfunction following colorectal surgery necessitates temporary urinary drainage. Current practice assumes recovery of lower urinary tract function to coincide with successful micturition after removal of urethral catheter. The aim of this study was to analyze the recovery of bladder function following colorectal surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing colorectal operations underwent preoperative and postoperative uroflowmetry and residual urine estimation. All patients were catheterized suprapubically at surgery. Uroflowmetry and postvoid residual volumes were recorded postoperatively until recovery of bladder function was complete. RESULTS: Thirty consecutive patients underwent suprapubic catheterization, 25 of whom completed the study. Seventeen (68 percent) patients were able to pass urine within 72 hours of surgery. Recovery of lower urinary tract function was delayed in patients undergoing rectal vs. colonic resections (median, 6 vs. 3 days, P = 0.0015). Postvoid residual volumes greater than 200 ml were noted in three (20 percent) patients following rectal resections beyond the tenth postoperative day, with complete emptying achieved by six weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Apparent successful micturition following rectal resections does not always indicate recovery of bladder function. The use of suprapubic catheters, in addition to being safe and effective, allows assessment of residual volumes postoperatively and smoothes the path to full recovery of lower urinary tract function.

Aged↗

PubMed1991

Short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.

In the last 2 years, 50 patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery were prospectively studied about antibiotic prophylaxis. Two groups of 25 patients each were randomly selected. Both received: (a) a colic preparation: hypactic drugs and two enemas during the day before surgery and (b) metronidazole 0.5 g plus neomycin 1 g per 8 h orally for 1 day before surgery. Every group also received: group A, metronidazole 0.5 g plus amikacin 500 mg i.v. 2 h before surgery and the same doses per 8 or 12 h, respectively, for 2 days postoperatively; group B, ornidazole 1 g by intravenous infusion plus ceftriaxone 2 g i.v. 2 h before surgery and the same doses of the drugs per 24 h for 2 days postoperatively. Wound infection occurred in 1 case of group A versus 2 cases of group B (p greater than 0.25). Ornidazole plus ceftriaxone prophylactic antibiotic therapy is therefore as effective as a classic therapy (metronidazole plus amikacin) and constitutes an alternative choice for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, because the simple manner of its administration (once per 24 h) is resulting in cost saving due to gained nursing time.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the complicated patient.

BACKGROUND: Major comorbidities are recognized risk factors in colorectal surgery. We examine here the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LC) in the complicated, high-risk patient. METHODS: From July 2003 to October 2004, 107 consecutive patients undergoing LC were prospectively studied. Complicated patients were defined as age >80 years, body mass index (BMI) >30, and/or American Society of Anesthesiology level III or IV. A group of case-matched controls undergoing open surgery (OC) during a similar time period were retrospectively reviewed. The 2 groups were compared and assessed for major and minor morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Overall morbidity was higher in the OC group 52% versus 26%. Minor complications compared at 31% OC versus 9% LC and major at 21% and 17%, respectively. With LC, advancement to discharge was more rapid and discharge home more likely than to a care facility. CONCLUSION: With proper patient selection and laparoscopic experience, LC can be performed in the complicated patient without undue morbidity and mortality.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1992

Excessive wastage of blood resources in elective colorectal surgery.

A prospective study of perioperative blood transfusion requirements for elective colorectal surgery over a 6-month period has been conducted. A total of 106 procedures was performed, 94 of which were for malignancy. A median of 2 units of packed red cells was cross-matched per patient. Twenty-three patients (21.7%) required a transfusion in the postoperative period. Fourteen of these patients required a second cross-match sample because their transfusion occurred more than 48 h after the original request. The greatest transfusion requirements were for patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection or subtotal colectomy. Routine perioperative cross-matching and reservation of blood for elective colorectal surgery may be an unnecessary expense, resulting in wastage of resources. A selective policy of serum being retained for grouping in these patients is justified.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Temperature control and recovery of bowel function after laparoscopic or laparotomic colorectal surgery in patients receiving combined epidural/general anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia.

UNLABELLED: We compared the effects of a laparoscopic (n = 23) versus laparotomic (n = 21) technique for major abdominal surgery on temperature control in 44 patients undergoing colorectal surgery during a combined epidural/general anesthesia. A thoracic epidural block up to T4 was induced with 6-10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine; general anesthesia was induced with thiopental, fentanyl, and atracurium IV and maintained with isoflurane. Core temperature was measured with a bladder probe and recorded every 15 min after the induction. In both groups, core temperature decreased to 35.2 degrees C (range, 34 degrees C-36 degrees C) at the end of surgery. After surgery, normothermia returned after 75 min (60-120 min) in the Laparoscopy group and 60 min (45-180 min) in the Laparotomy group (P = 0.56). No differences in postanesthesia care unit discharge time were reported between the two groups. The degree of pain during coughing was smaller after laparoscopy than laparotomy from the 24th to the 72nd observation times (P < 0.01). Morphine consumption was 22 mg (2-65 mg) in the Laparotomy group and 5 mg (0-45 mg) in the Laparoscopy group (P = 0.02). The time to first flatus was shorter after laparoscopy (24 h [16-72 h]) than laparotomy (72 h [26-96 h]) (P = 0.0005), and the first intake of clear liquid occurred after 48 h (24-72 h) in the Laparoscopy group and after 96 h (90-96 h) in the Laparotomy group (P = 0.0005). Although laparoscopic surgery provides positive effects on the degree of postoperative pain and recovery of bowel function, the reduction in heat loss produced by minimizing bowel exposure with laparoscopic surgery does not compensate for the anesthesia-related effects on temperature control, and active patient warming must also be used with laparoscopic techniques. IMPLICATIONS: This prospective, randomized, controlled study demonstrates that laparoscopic colorectal surgery results in less postoperative pain and earlier recovery of bowel function than conventional laparotomy but does not reduce the risk for perioperative hypothermia. Accordingly, active warming must be provided to patients also during laparoscopic procedures.

Adult↗

PubMed1986

Sulbactam/ampicillin compared with cefoxitin for chemoprophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.

In a prospective, randomized, comparative study, patients undergoing elective major colorectal surgery received four six-hour doses of either sulbactam (a beta-lactamase inhibitor) with ampicillin (1 gm with 1 gm), or cefoxitin (2 gm) commencing at induction of anesthesia. The groups were well matched for age, sex, diagnosis, and surgical procedures. Three patients in the sulbactam group (N = 44), and four in the cefoxitin group (N = 48) developed significant wound sepsis. Minor wound sepsis occurred in an additional four sulbactam patients, and in five cefoxitin patients. There was no difference between the groups in deep sepsis or anastomotic leak rates (sulbactam, four patients; cefoxitin, seven patients). No serious side effects were recorded in either group. These results suggest that sulbactam combined with ampicillin provides a safe, effective alternative to cefoxitin for prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Ultrasonic versus standard electric dissection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of the ultrasonic dissection (UC) compared with standard electrosurgery (ES) in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND DATA: High-frequency ultrasound energy was introduced in laparoscopic surgery to improve dissection and coagulation. Very limited data have been published on its use in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: Patients eligible for elective laparoscopic right or left hemicolectomy (RH and LH), sigmoidectomy (SG), or low anterior resection (LAR) were randomized to either UC or ES. The following data were collected and analyzed: preoperative data (individual patient data, indication for surgery), intraoperative data (conversion to open surgery, conversion ES to UC, operative time, blood loss, complication rate), and postoperative data (morbidity and mortality, volume of drainage, hospital stay). RESULTS: Between January 2002 and December 2003, 171 patients underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal resection. Twenty-5 patients did not satisfy the inclusion criteria and were excluded. The diagnosis of the remaining 146 patients was diverticulitis (44), colonic adenoma (31), adenocarcinoma (70), or epidermoid carcinoma (1). These patients underwent laparoscopic RH (28), LH (31), SG (47), or LAR (40). There were no differences in preoperative data. The overall conversion rate to open surgery was 11.6%, with no differences between the two groups; 20.8% undergoing ES were converted to UC, more frequently during right hemicolectomy or low anterior resection. Operative time, the primary endpoint of this study, did not differ between the two groups: UC 93 minutes versus ES 102.6 minutes (P = 0.46). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in UC 140.8 mL versus ES 182.6 mL (P = 0.032). No differences were observed in postoperative morbidity or other preoperative or postoperative parameters. CONCLUSIONS: UC is a useful device in laparoscopic colorectal surgery that facilitates completion of difficult cases and reduces intraoperative blood loss. Nevertheless, the majority of laparoscopic procedures can be completed with ES. Therefore, selective use of UC appears to be the most cost-effective policy.

Aged↗