PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Consensus Development Conference, NIH”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

NIH conference. Diagnosis and management of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: consensus development conference statement.

Endocrinologists, surgeons, radiologists, epidemiologists, and primary health care providers convened to address both indications for surgery in asymptomatic patients with hyperparathyroidism as well as how patients who do not have surgery should be monitored and managed to minimize the risk for complications. The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel concluded that a diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism is established by showing persistent hypercalcemia and an elevated serum parathyroid hormone concentration; that the current and acceptable treatment for hyperparathyroidism is surgery; that the diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism in an asymptomatic patient does not in all cases mandate referral for surgery; that conscientious surveillance may be justified in patients whose calcium levels are only mildly elevated and whose renal and bone status are close to normal; and that preoperative localization in patients without previous neck operation is rarely indicated and has not proved to be cost effective.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗

NIH consensus conference. Ovarian cancer. Screening, treatment, and follow-up. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Ovarian Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To provide physicians with a current consensus on screening, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ovarian cancer. PARTICIPANTS: A nonfederal, nonadvocate, 14-member consensus panel representing the fields of gynecologic, medical, and radiation oncology, obstetrics/gynecology, and biostatistics; 25 experts in obstetrics/gynecology and gynecologic, medical, and radiation oncology who presented data to the consensus panel; and a conference audience of approximately 500. EVIDENCE: The literature was searched through MEDLINE, and an extensive bibliography of references was produced for the panel and the conference audience. Experts prepared abstracts with relevant citations from the literature. Scientific evidence was given priority over clinical anecdotal experience. CONSENSUS: The panel, answering predefined consensus questions, developed their conclusions based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. CONSENSUS STATEMENT: The panel composed a draft statement that was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. The panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence available yet that the current screening modalities of CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasonography can be effectively used for widespread screening to reduce mortality from ovarian cancer nor that their use will result in decreased rather than increased morbidity and mortality. Women with stage IA grade 1 and stage IB grade 1 ovarian cancer do not require postoperative adjuvant therapy. Many remaining stage I patients do require chemotherapy. Subsets of stage I must be fully defined and ideal treatment determined. Women with stages II, III, and IV epithelial ovarian cancer (other than low malignant potential tumors) should receive postoperative chemotherapy.

CA-125 Antigen↗

Appendix: The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Management of Hepatitis C 2002.

The incidence of newly acquired hepatitis C infection has diminished in the United States. This decline is largely because of a decrease in cases among IDUs for reasons that are unclear and, to a lesser extent, to testing of blood donors for HCV. The virus is transmitted by blood, and such transmission now occurs primarily through injection drug use, sex with an infected partner or multiple partners, and occupational exposure. Most infections become chronic, and therefore the prevalence of HCV infections is high, with about 3 million Americans estimated, to be chronically infected. HCV is a leading cause of cirrhosis, a common cause of HCC and the leading cause of liter transplantation in the United States. The disease spectrum associated with HCV infection varies greatly. Various studies have suggested that 3% to 10% of chronically infected patients will develop cirrhosis over a 20-year period, and these patients are at risk for HCC. Persons who are older at the time of infection, patients with continuous exposure to alcohol, and those coinfected with HIV or HBV demonstrate accelerated progression to more advanced liver disease. Conversely, individuals infected at a younger age have little or no disease progression over several decades. The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C infection often is suggested by abnormalities in ALT levels and is established by EIA followed by confirmatory determination of HCV RNA. Several sensitive and specific assays are automated partly for the purposes of detecting HCV RNA and quantifying the viral level. Although there is little correlation between viral level and disease manifestations, these assays have proven useful in identifying those patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment and, particularly, in demonstrating successful response to treatment as defined by an SVR. Liver biopsy is useful in defining baseline abnormalities of liver disease and in enabling patients and healthcare providers to reach a decision regarding antiviral therapy. Noninvasive tests do not provide the information that can be obtained through liver biopsy. Information on the genotype of the virus is important to guide treatment decisions. Genotype 1, most commonly found in the United States, is less amenable to treatment than genotypes 2 or 3. Therefore, clinical trials of antiviral therapies require genotyping information for appropriate stratification of subjects. Recent therapeutic trials in defined, selected populations have shown clearly that combinations of interferons and ribavirin are more effective than monotherapy. Moreover, trials using pegylated interferons have yielded improved SVR rates with similar toxicity profiles. Results continue to show, however, that the SVR rate is less common in patients with genotype 1 infections, higher HCV RNA levels, or more advanced stages of fibrosis. Genotype 1 infections require therapy for 48 weeks, whereas shorter treatment is feasible in genotype 2 and 3 infections. In genotype 1, the lack of an early virologic response (< 2 log decrease in HCV RNA) is associated with failure to achieve an SVR. The SVR is lower in patients with advanced liver disease than in patients without cirrhosis. Ongoing trials are exploring the usefulness of combination therapy in various populations. Preliminary experience in IDUs, individuals coinfected with HIV, children, and other special groups suggests similar responses are achievable in these populations. Patients with acute hepatitis C may be treated, but specific recommendations for antiviral treatment must await further evaluation of the rate of spontaneous clearance of the virus and determination of the optimal time to initiate treatment. Preventive measures beyond blood-banking practices include prompt identification of infected individuals, awareness of the potential for perinatal transmission, implementation of safe injection practices, linkage of drug users to drug treatment programs. and implementation of community-based education and support programs to modify risk behavior. Some of these measures have been implemented successfully in the control of HIV infections, and it stands to reason that they would be valuable for reducing HCV transmission. Future advances in the diagnosis and management of hepatitis C require continued vigilance concerning the transmission of this infection, extending treatment to populations not evaluated previously in treatment trials, and the introduction of more effective therapies.

Antiviral Agents↗

[Osteoporosis and bone quality referred in NIH consensus 2000].

National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement 2000 included four main items. They were;definition of osteoporosis and fracture risk, different fracture risks among different segments of the population, factors for building and maintaining skeletal health throughout life, and evaluation and treatment of osteoporosis. It is clearly documented in the statement that bone strength reflects the integration of bone density and bone quality, and that evaluation of fracture in osteoporosis should depend on risk-based assessment rather than solely on the assessment of a BMD T-score. These issues indicate a new direction in the management of osteoporosis in near future.

Bone Density↗

NIH report.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic↗

Panelists' views of 68 NIH consensus conference.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the response patterns and trends of 68 surveys of successive NIH consensus panels' views on the NIH consensus process. METHODS: Each panel's responses were compared to an "average" panel's responses calculated by determining the mean response for each survey question across panels. RESULTS: The results show a stable pattern of panelists' generally positive views. However, several conferences were judged very positively and some very negatively compared to the norm. Most negatively viewed conferences occurred early in the consensus program's history. CONCLUSIONS: The disparate perceptions are discussed and interpreted as reflecting favorable panels' views of recent changes in the NIH Consensus Development Program.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗