PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DENTURE BASES”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Bone strength of resilient lining materials to various denture base resins.

Adhesion failure of resilient lining materials to poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base material is a problem that is encountered clinically. This study compared the shear bond strength of some of the commercially available resilient lining materials to various denture base resins. Significant differences were observed in the shear strengths between the selected resilient liners and the denture base materials. Coe Super Soft specimens failed principally cohesively. Molloplast-B specimens always failed cohesively and Novus specimens always failed adhesively. Therefore, it was apparent that the bond strengths of Molloplast-B and Coe Super Soft specimens exceeded the cohesive strength. The bond strength of Novus was dependent on the denture base material and was greatest with Lucitone 199 and TS 1195.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1996

Fracture surface characteristics of damaged acrylic-resin-based dentures as analysed by SEM-replica technique.

The aim of this study was to determine some characteristics of the fracture surface of an acrylic resin denture. For this purpose, five complete upper dentures and two complete lower dentures that had fractured into two pieces were collected, the fracture surfaces were duplicated with the SEM-replica technique and duplicated surfaces were investigated with a scanning electron microscope. The reproducibility of the SEM-replica technique was tested by comparing one original sample surface and its replica surface of the same area. The SEM-photomicrographs revealed a series of fine striations in the fracture surfaces of both the upper and lower dentures perpendicularly orientated to the direction of the fracture propagation. A smooth area on the fracture surface was assumed to indicate a slow fatigue fracture process, and a rougher area fracturing with increased velocity.

Dental Restoration Failure↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Accuracy and porosity of denture bases submitted to two polymerization cycles.

In this study was verified accuracy and porosity of denture bases submitted to double cycles of polymerization. Thirty-Six master casts were made in dental stone from the impression of the metal die. They were divided in three groups. Denture bases of conventional acrylic resin were made on the casts of the groups I (GI-control) and II (GII), polymerized in water bath during 9 hours at 73 degrees C, and specific resin for microwave polymerization were made on the casts of the group III (GIII) and cured at 500 W during 3 minutes. Accuracy was verified by the weight of a impression material put between the denture base and cast die under load of 2 Kg. Afterwards, all the denture bases were relined by addition method and those of the group I and II were relined with the same material and polymerization technic. The denture bases of the group II were filled with the same resin, however cured in microwave oven with 500 W during 3 minutes. Accuracy was reevaluated. The porosity was verified by the immersion of the specimens in a solution of permanent black ink and the pores were counted through a stereo light microscope under magnification of 6.3 x. The average and standard deviation obtained for accuracy before and after the relining were respectively: GI: 0.63 +/- 0.02 - 0.66 +/- 0.03; GII: 0.63 +/- 0.03 - 0.68 +/- 0.03: GIII: 0.58 +/- 0.02 - 0.80 +/- 0.05. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05 as tested by Tukey) only for the group III. The average and standard deviation for porosity before and after the relining were respectively: GI: 8.33 +/- 0.63 - 9.25 +/- 0.85; GII: 8.17 +/- 0.98 - 10.08 +/- 1.63: GIII: 5.41 +/- 0.78 - 6.58 +/- 1.02. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) for the group III before relining. The conclusion is that after relining, the conventional resin cured by water bath or microwaves energy showed a better adaptation, and the highest number of pores.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed2003

The effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the residual monomer content of two denture base resins.

OBJECTIVE: The amount of residual monomer is one of the principal factors affecting the properties of acrylic resin denture bases. In recent years, glass fibers have been used to strengthen denture base resins. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the amount of residual methyl methacrylate released from two different denture base resins (heat cured and autopolymerized). METHOD AND MATERIALS: Continuous unidirectional and woven preimpregnated glass fiber reinforcements (Stick and Stick Net) were used to reinforce heat-curing and autopolymerizing denture base resins. RESULTS: The release of residual methyl methacrylate from heat-cured and autopolymerized test specimens reinforced with glass fibers was significantly higher than that from unreinforced test specimens. Stick Net glass fiber reinforcement resulted in significantly higher residual monomer release than did Stick glass fiber reinforcement. Test specimens made from heat-cured denture polymethyl methacrylate released less residual methyl methacrylate than did specimens made from autopolymerized polymethyl methacrylate. CONCLUSION: Glass fiber reinforcement increases the residual monomer content of denture base resins. The level of residual monomer ranged from 0.11% to 0.37% in heat-cured resin and from 0.18% to 0.46% in autopolymerized denture base resin.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1982

A laboratory and clinical study of Trevalon denture base material.

Trevalon is a denture base material which can be cured by three basic alternative curing cycles, thus providing a choice of processing technique which can be selected to suit laboratory or clinical needs. The flexibility of working properties is probably due to the interaction between on the one hand, the high molecular weight of the powder and on the other hand, the particle size distribution which are important factors influencing the doughing time (14 min), working time (40 min) and the exothermic reaction. The effect of each curing cycle upon the following properties of the material was investigated; dimensional accuracy, Young's modulus, modulus of rupture, impact resistance, water sorption, indentation resistance, creep and transverse bend behaviour. The particle size and molecular weight distribution of the powder were also evaluated. A clinical investigation of Trevalon was carried out by constructing complete dentures for a sample of patients, divided into three groups, each group having dentures processed by one of the three alternative curing cycles. Although some laboratory tests demonstrated that there were statistically significant differences between specimen bases, no clinical differences were recorded between dentures 1 year after construction.

Chemical Phenomena↗
PubMed1989

[Mechanical analysis of the denture bases, using the photoelastic-coating method. 1. Influence of the coating on mechanical properties of the test denture].

The anterior palatal area may be related with the flexural rigidity and bending strength of the upper complete dentures. Therefore, the deformation of this area should be measured widely and continuously when new materials were applied to the dentures. The influence of the photoelastic coating on the mechanical properties of the upper complete dentures was investigated, prior to the measurement of surface strains on the denture bases by the photoelastic coatings. In this experiment, the uniform-moment bending method was employed simulating the occlusal situation. The flexural rigidity of the denture bases depended on the palatal materials in spite of the presence of the coating. The strains concentrated on the anterior palatal area were slightly decreased when the coating was bonded to the polished surface of the palate. The reinforcing effect was significant when the resin dentures of low elastic modulus were coated. The photoelastic-coating method was suitable for the qualitative analysis of the strain distribution of the denture base and selecting the test points to make strain measurement accurate.

Dental Stress Analysis↗
PubMed1980

The cast aluminum denture base. Part II: Technique.

A technique to wax-up and cast an aluminum base and a method to incorporate the base into the final denture base has been discussed. This technique does not use induction casting, rather it uses two casting ovens and a centrifugal casting machine.

Aluminum↗
PubMed1999

Denture plaque and adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials in vivo and in vitro.

The aim of this paper is to review our understanding of the mechanisms and clinical significance of adhesion of C. albicans to denture-base materials in relation to denture plaque and denture-related stomatitis. Earlier reports in the literature of a 65% prevalence level of denture-related stomatitis seem to be exaggerated. More recent studies indicate that denture-related stomatitis is considerably less common, particularly in normal healthy subjects. The etiology of the condition is discussed in this review, and although much of the literature supports the view that the condition is strongly associated with C. albicans, this is not always so. In some subjects, the cause appears to be related to a non-specific plaque. This review also considers the role of denture plaque in the pathogenesis of denture-related stomatitis, the sequential development of denture plaque, and its colonization by Candida organisms. Designing controlled in vivo studies is difficult, and as a consequence, many investigators have had to resort to in vitro studies. The majority of these studies have attempted to investigate the hydrophobicity of C. albicans, relating the surface free-energy of denture-base materials, particularly acrylic resin, to that of the organism. Surprisingly little work has been directed at surface roughness and how it affects retention of organisms. Further, no attention has been paid to the properties and character of the surface, other than average surface roughness, as it affects adhesion. A comparison of results from in vitro studies on the effect on adhesion of pre-coating the surfaces of denture-base materials with saliva has produced equivocal conclusions. This is largely due to little standardization of experimental protocols between studies, particularly in the collection and handling of the saliva used. In conclusion, the review strongly supports the suggestion that adherence of C. albicans to denture-base materials in vitro is related to the hydrophobicity of the organism. The clinical significance of the observation and the mechanisms for the development and maturation of denture plaque are yet to be understood. There is a clear need for further investigation of other factors that may moderate the adhesion of organisms and subsequent colonization of denture-base materials.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1999

Microwave disinfection of denture base materials colonized with Candida albicans.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Infection of denture materials with Candida albicans is common and contributes to denture stomatitis. PURPOSE: This 3-phase investigation examined: (1) the efficacy of microwave irradiation against C albicans colonized on 3 soft denture liners and 1 heat-polymerized denture base resin, and (2) the effect of this irradiation on the hardness of the materials tested. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In phase 1, an experimental protocol was developed. Sterilized specimens from 2 denture base soft liners and 1 heat-polymerized acrylic resin denture base material (n = 45 each) were inoculated with C albicans. Two thirds of the specimens were irradiated in a 60 Hz microwave oven for 5 minutes (dry). C albicans growth was then assessed with streaked blood agar plates and thioglycollate broth. One third of the specimens were not irradiated and served as controls. Pretest and posttest Shore A hardness values were obtained and compared. For phase 2, 15 specimens from each material group were subjected to irradiation (while immersed in water) for 5 minutes; and, 15 from each material were subjected to 10- and 15-minute irradiation (dry), with subsequent sterility and change in hardness assessments completed as described in phase 1. In phase 3, 15 specimens from each material group were subjected to repeated 5-minute irradiation cycles (while immersed in water), and changes in hardness were examined. RESULTS: Only the 5-minute irradiated specimens immersed in water were effectively sterilized, as verified by the thioglycollate assay. The effect of repeated 5-minute irradiation cycles resulted in a significant change in hardness of the PermaSoft specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Five-minute irradiation, while immersed in water, killed all C albicans present on the materials tested; and, repeated 5-minute irradiation significantly affected the hardness of only the PermaSoft material.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2006

Effect of surface preparation using ethyl acetate on the repair strength of denture base resin.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface preparation using ethyl acetate on the repair strength of a denture base resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bar specimens were fabricated with a heat-processed denture base resin and cut in half. The repair surfaces of the specimens were treated with ethyl acetate for varying amounts of time before the autopolymerizing repair resin was applied. The specimens were then immersed in 37 degrees C distilled water for 2 days. A three-point bending test was used to determine the transverse strength of the test specimens. Ten specimens prepared using a 120-s application of ethyl acetate and 10 specimens prepared using a 5-s application of dichloromethane were thermocycled at 10,000 cycles (at 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C) with a 60-s dwell time. The morphological changes in the repair surfaces after preparation were observed by scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The repair strength of the denture base resin prepared using ethyl acetate for 120 s (30.6 MPa) was the highest among the results for the various amounts of time tested (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the repair bond strength both before and after thermocycling of the denture base resin prepared using ethyl acetate for 120 s and that of the denture base resin prepared with dichloromethane for 5 s (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the current study, a 120-s application of ethyl acetate was as effective as a 5-s application of dichloromethane at preparing the surfaces of a denture base resin.

Acetates↗
PubMed2000

Titanium for removable denture bases.

The aim of the present study was to compare titanium-base and resin-base maxillary complete dentures. In 13 patients with a maxillary complete denture with a titanium base (group I) and in 12 patients with a maxillary complete denture with a resin base (group II), the (a) patient's adaptation to the denture, (b) denture retention and (c) appearance of the mucosa under the denture were evaluated. In all cases, the adaptation was assessed with a questionnaire, while the retention and the appearance of the mucosa were assessed by clinical examination. None of the three measures considered (adaptation, retention and mucosa appearance) differed significantly between patients with titanium-base dentures and patients with resin-base dentures. Titanium bases are suitable for dentures likely to be subject to severe mechanical stresses (as in the case of maxillary complete dentures opposing natural teeth), and in patients who show hypersensitivity responses to other materials.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of denture base resins on oral epithelial cells.

The current proliferation of light-polymerized denture base resins and the continual modification of their formulations make standardized biocompatibility testing a necessity. The biocompatibilities of three light-polymerized denture base resins were compared using an in vitro epithelial cell culture system. The effect of varied lengths of polymerization of denture base resin on cell toxicity was examined. This study indicated that light-polymerized denture base resins have an effect on oral epithelial cells that appears to be related to the specific formulation of the material and not to the type of polymerization required. Varying the polymerization time or light-polymerization unit appeared to have little effect.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed2003

The distal extension base denture.

The distal extension base denture may be indicated in situations in which the edentulous area to be restored is without a terminal abutment tooth. There may be significant challenges in providing a prosthesis with sufficient support and retention to make it comfortable without damaging the intra-oral tissues. This can be a greater problem in the mandible as the denture-bearing area is usually much smaller than in the maxilla. This paper considers how distal extension removable prostheses can be designed to restore edentulous spaces.

Dental Clasps↗
PubMed2004

The effect of polymerization cycles on porosity of microwave-processed denture base resin.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Although most of the physical properties of denture base resin polymerized by microwave energy have been shown to be similar to resins polymerized by the conventional heat polymerization method, the presence of porosity is a problem. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of different microwave polymerization cycles on the porosity of a denture base resin designed for microwave polymerization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two rectangular resin specimens (65 x 40 x 5 mm) were divided into 3 experimental groups (A, B, and C; Onda-Cryl, microwave-polymerized resin) and 1 control group (T; Clássico, heat-polymerized resin), according to the following polymerization cycles: (A) 500 W for 3 minutes, (B) 90 W for 13 minutes+500 W for 90 seconds, (C) 320 W for 3 minutes+0 W for 4 minutes+720 W for 3 minutes, and (T) 74 degrees C for 9 hours. Porosity was calculated by measurement of the specimen volume before and after its immersion in water. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The mean values and SDs of the percent mean porosity were: A=1.05%+/-0.28%, B=0.91%+/-0.15%, C=0.88%+/-0.23%, T=0.93%+/-0.23%. No significant differences were found in mean porosity among the groups evaluated. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, a denture base resin specifically designed for microwave polymerization tested was not affected by different polymerization cycles. Porosity was similar to the conventional heat-polymerized denture base resin tested.

Acrylic Resins↗