PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Excision Repair”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Monitoring base excision repair by in vitro assays.

Base excision repair (BER) is the major mechanism for processing of mutagenic and genotoxic DNA base lesions caused by cellular environmental or exogenous mutagens. In vitro base excision repair assays have been used in studies aimed at understanding the nature of various human diseases, aging and mechanisms of genome recovery after mutagenic stress. This review describes the key base excision repair assays and addresses their advantages and limitations.

Animals↗

Purification and characterization of Escherichia coli and human nucleotide excision repair enzyme systems.

Nucleotide excision repair is a multicomponent, multistep enzymatic system that removes a wide spectrum of DNA damage by dual incisions in the damaged strand on both sides of the lesion. The basic steps are damage recognition, dual incisions, resynthesis to replace the excised DNA, and ligation. Each step has been studied in vitro using cell extracts or highly purified repair factors and radiolabeled DNA of known sequence with DNA damage at a defined site. This chapter describes procedures for preparation of DNA substrates designed for analysis of damage recognition, either the 5' or the 3' incision event, excision (resulting from concerted dual incisions), and repair synthesis. Excision in Escherichia coli is accomplished by the three-subunit Uvr(A)BC excision nuclease and in humans by six repair factors: XPA, RPA, XPChR23B, TFIIH, XPFERCC1, and XPG. This chapter outlines methods for expression and purification of these essential repair factors and provides protocols for performing each of the in vitro repair assays with either the E. coli or the human excision nuclease.

Animals↗

Replication protein A stimulates long patch DNA base excision repair.

Two pathways for completion of DNA base excision repair (BER) have recently emerged. In one, called short patch BER, only the damaged nucleotide is replaced, whereas in the second, known as long patch BER, the monobasic lesion is removed along with additional downstream nucleotides. Flap endonuclease 1, which preferentially cleaves unannealed 5'-flap structures in DNA, has been shown to play a crucial role in the long patch mode of repair. This nuclease will efficiently release 5'-terminal abasic lesions as part of an intact oligonucleotide when cleavage is combined with strand displacement synthesis. Further gap filling and ligation complete repair. We reconstituted the final steps of long patch base excision repair in vitro using calf DNA polymerase epsilon to provide strand displacement synthesis, human flap endonuclease 1, and human DNA ligase I. Replication protein A is an important constituent of the DNA replication machinery. It also has been shown to interact with an early component of base excision repair: uracil glycosylase. Here we show that human replication protein A greatly stimulates long patch base excision repair.

DNA Ligase ATP↗

Cip1 inhibits DNA replication but not PCNA-dependent nucleotide excision-repair.

BACKGROUND: DNA that is damaged by ultraviolet (UV) light is repaired predominantly by nucleotide excision-repair, a process requiring the DNA polymerase auxiliary factor PCNA. UV-irradiation also induces the production of Cip1 protein via activation of p53. Cip1 is an inhibitor of the cyclin-dependent kinases, which are required for the cell cycle to proceed through the G1/S-phase transition and initiate DNA replication. Inhibition by Cip1 probably causes the block to initiation of DNA replication that is seen in irradiated cells. Cip1 also directly inhibits the function of PCNA during DNA synthesis. As nucleotide excision-repair requires PCNA, the physiological relevance of PCNA inhibition by Cip1 is currently unclear. RESULTS: We show that nucleotide excision-repair of UV-damaged DNA occurs in extracts of Xenopus eggs, and that this reaction is PCNA-dependent. The repair reaction is not inhibited by Cip1, even when the level of PCNA is reduced 100-fold so that it becomes limiting for DNA repair. By contrast, Cip1 strongly suppresses the function of PCNA in replicative DNA synthesis under these conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Cip1 can potentially inhibit DNA replication in Xenopus egg extracts by inhibiting the cyclin-dependent kinase function required for the initiation of replication forks, and also by inhibiting PCNA function. The inhibition of PCNA is selective for its function in DNA replication, however, as Cip1 does not affect PCNA function in nucleotide excision-repair. The induction of Cip1 in response to DNA damage, therefore, allows repair to continue in the genome under conditions in which replication is severely inhibited.

Animals↗

UV mutagenesis in E. coli with excision repair initiated by uvrABC or denV gene products.

Mutation frequency responses produced by ultraviolet light are compared in 4 closely related strains of E. coli B/r having the same tyr(Oc) allele and different excision-repair capabilities: uvr+ (excision repair initiated by wild-type UvrABC activity), uvrA (excision repair defective), uvrA/pdenV-7 (excision repair initiated by endonuclease V of bacteriophage T4, DenV activity), and uvr+/pdenV-7 (excision repair initiated by UvrABC and DenV activities). The production of Tyr+ prototrophic mutants is classified into back-mutations and de novo or converted glutamine tRNA suppressor mutations to indicate different mutation events. Cells transformed with the plasmid pdenV-7 require larger exposures than the parent strains to produce comparable mutation frequency responses, indicating that DenV activity can repair mutagenic photoproducts. When damage reduction by UvrABC or DenV is compared for each of the specific categories of mutation, the results are consistent with the idea that pyrimidine dimers infrequently or never target back-mutations of this allele, frequently target the de novo suppressor mutations, and extensively or exclusively target the converted suppressor mutations. This analysis is based on the distinction that UvrABC-initiated excision repair recognizes dimer and non-dimer (pyrimidine (6-4) pyrimidone) photoproducts but that DenV-initiated repair recognizes only pyrimidine dimers.

Cloning, Molecular↗

Mutational specificity and the influence of excision repair: insights into the mechanisms of error-avoidance and error-fixation.

The excision repair process controlled by the uvrABC gene in Escherichia coli is the major pathway for the repair of a diverse series of DNA damages. To achieve a better understanding of the mechanics of this repair pathway and its impact upon mutagenesis, we have applied a recently developed technology by which the nature of mutation is determined at the DNA sequence level. A comparison of the classes and distribution of mutation in excision-repair-proficient and excision-repair-deficient strains of E. coli reveals that the absence of excision repair can alter both the nature of the mutations recovered as well as their distribution. This can occur in one of several ways. For example, under some circumstances the action of the UvrABC pathway can lead to interruptions of DNA strand continuity and an enhancement of both frameshift and deletion events. Such an effect is seen following damage by psoralen plus near UV (PUVA) treatment that produces crosslinks in the DNA. In comparison, several other treatments produce similar distributions within the classes of mutations recovered but demonstrate an alteration in site specificity. Such is the case following UV irradiation. In this case, the data indicate that while the premutagenic lesions may be the same, mutation fixation in the presence and absence of excision repair may involve different mechanisms. Similarly, evidence from the repair of damage by ethylating agents indicates that while the nature of the mutations recovered is not altered, the preferred location of these events is altered in the absence of excision repair. These results indicate that local DNA sequence can affect on the efficiency of excision repair.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Alkylating Agents↗

Repair of dihydrouracil supported by base excision repair in mNTH1 knock-out cell extracts.

In mammalian cells, thymine glycols and other oxidized pyrimidines such as 5,6-dihydrouracil are removed from DNA by the NTH1 protein, a bifunctional DNA-N-glycosylase. However, mNTH1 knock-out mice in common with other DNA glycosylase-deficient mice do not show any severe abnormalities associated with accumulation of DNA damage and mutations. In the present study we used an in vitro repair system to investigate the mechanism for the removal of 5,6-dihydrouracil from DNA by mNTH1-deficient cell-free extracts derived from testes of mNTH1 knock-out mice. We found that these extracts are able to support the removal of 5,6-dihydrouracil from DNA at about 20% of the efficiency of normal extracts. Furthermore, we also found that single-nucleotide patch base excision repair is the major pathway for removal of 5,6-dihydrouracil in mNTH1-deficient cell extracts, suggesting the involvement of other DNA glycosylase(s) in the removal of oxidized pyrimidines.

Animals↗

The suitability of the micronucleus assay in human lymphocytes as a new biomarker of excision repair.

The cytokinesis blocked micronucleus assay is relatively insensitive to detect agents that predominantly induce excision repairable DNA lesions. However, it has been recently proposed that excision-repairable DNA lesions induced in G0/G1 phase can be converted to micronuclei by using inhibitors of the gap filling step of excision repair so that unfilled gaps are converted to double stranded breaks after S phase and micronuclei (MN) at completion of mitosis. As it has been recently demonstrated this process could be improved by combining cytosine arabinoside (ARA-C) and hydroxyurea (HU). In the present work, we have investigated the suitability of this new approach by studying its ability to detect excision repairable DNA lesions induced by 10 pesticides (alachlor, atrazine, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, fenpropathrin, fenvalerate, maleic hydrazide, paraquat, permethrin and trifluralin) and 3 well-known mutagenic agents (ethyl methane sulphonate, EMS; methylnitrosourea, MNU; and mytomicin C, MMC). Our results showed that the combination of ARA-C and HU substantially increased the level of MN in whole blood lymphocyte cultures, but it provided an excess of toxicity when further treatments, such as MNU, were performed. When ARA-C alone was used, the ARA/CBMN assay appeared to be highly sensitive and specific in detecting agents known to induce excision repairable DNA lesions. Thus, EMS and MNU but not MMC greatly induced DNA excision repair. On the other hand, alachlor, permethrin and, to a lesser extent, trifluralin and fenpropathrin also increased the ratio of excision repairable DNA lesions converted to MN. On the contrary, atrazine, cypermethrin, deltamethrin, fenvalerate, maleic hydrazide and paraquat did not induce excision repair.

Adult↗

DNA ligation during excision repair in yeast cell-free extracts is specifically catalyzed by the CDC9 gene product.

Excision repair of DNA is an important cellular response to DNA damage induced by radiation and many chemicals. In eukaryotes, base excision repair (BER) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) are two major excision repair pathways which are completed by a DNA ligation step. Using a cell-free system, we have determined the DNA ligase requirement during BER and NER of the yeast S. cerevisiae. Under nonpermissive conditions in extracts of the cdc9-2 temperature-sensitive mutant, DNA ligation in both BER and NER pathways was defective, and the repair patches were enlarged. At the permissive temperature (23 degrees C), DNA ligation during excision repair was only partially functional in the mutant extracts. In contrast, deleting the DNA ligase IV gene did not affect DNA ligation of BER or NER. Defective DNA ligation of BER and NER in cdc9-2 mutant extracts was complemented in vitro by purified yeast Cdc9 protein, but not by DNA ligase IV even when overexpressed. These results demonstrate that the ligation step of excision repair in yeast cell-free extracts is catalyzed specifically by the Cdc9 protein, the homologue of mammalian DNA ligase I.

Catalysis↗

A repair competition assay to assess recognition by human nucleotide excision repair.

We developed a competition assay to compare, in a quantitative manner, the ability of human nucleotide excision repair (NER) to recognise structurally different forms of DNA damage. This assay uses a NER substrate consisting of M13 double-stranded DNA with a single and uniquely located acetylaminofluorene (AAF) adduct, and measures the efficiency by which multiply damaged plasmid DNA competes for excision repair of the site-directed modification. To validate this assay, we tested competitor DNA containing defined numbers of either AAF adducts or UV radiation products. In both cases, repair of the site-directed NER substrate was inhibited in a damage-specific and dose-dependent manner. We then exploited this competition assay to determine the susceptibility of bulky adozelesin-DNA adducts to human NER.

Base Sequence↗

The role of glutathione in the regulation of nucleotide excision repair during oxidative stress.

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) mainly repairs bulky DNA adducts and helix distorting lesions, but is additionally considered to be a back-up system for base excision repair to remove oxidative stress induced DNA damage. Therefore, it can be speculated that NER is up-regulated or primed by oxidative stress. Exposure of human pulmonary epithelial cells (A549) to non-toxic doses of 100muM H(2)O(2) indeed showed a 2 to 4.5-fold increase in expression of XPA, XPC, ERCC4, and ERCC5, whereas the expression of ERCC1 was 5-fold decreased. Phenotypical assessment of NER capacity (i.e. recognition and incision of benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts) showed a significant decrease to less than 50% after H(2)O(2) exposure, which paralleled the effects of H(2)O(2) on ERCC1 expression. To study the possible involvement of glutathione (GSH) in the regulation of NER, cells were pre-incubated with 0.5mM BSO, resulting in total GSH depletion and increased intracellular oxidative stress. In GSH-depleted cells, the down-regulation of ERCC1 expression by H(2)O(2) was completely abolished and the up-regulation of ERCC4 expression was potentiated from 2.5-fold to >10-fold. Similarly, the H(2)O(2)-induced decrease in NER capacity was absent in GSH-depleted cells. Overall, our data suggest that NER capacity as well as the expression of NER related genes can be modulated by oxidative stress. ERCC1 expression and NER capacity correlated strongly (R(2)=0.85, P<0.01) after oxidant exposure, indicating ERCC1 as a specific target for oxidative stress induced modification of NER.

Buthionine Sulfoximine↗

Base excision repair in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA.

Base excision repair mechanisms have been analyzed in nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. We measured the size and position of the newly incorporated DNA repair patch in various DNA substrates containing single oxidative lesions. Repair of 8-oxoguanine and of thymine glycol is almost exclusively via the base excision repair (BER) pathway with little or no involvement of nucleotide excision repair (NER). The repair mode is generally via the single-nucleotide replacement pathway with little incorporation into longer patches. Extension of these studies suggests that DNA polymerase beta plays a critical role not only in the short-patch repair process but also in the long-patch, PCNA-dependent pathway. Mitochondria are targets for a heavy load of oxidative DNA damage. They have efficient BER repair capacity, but cannot repair most bulky lesions normally repaired by NER. In vitro experiments performed using rat and human mitochondrial extracts suggest that the repair incorporation during the removal of uracil in DNA occurs via the short-patch repair BER pathway. Oxidative DNA damage accumulates with age in mitochondrial DNA, but this cannot be explained by an attenuation of DNA repair. In contrast, we observe that mitochondrial incision of 8-oxoG increases with age in rodents.

Adenine↗

Base excision repair is limited by different proteins in male germ cell nuclear extracts prepared from young and old mice.

The combined observations of elevated DNA repair gene expression, high uracil-DNA glycosylase-initiated base excision repair, and a low spontaneous mutant frequency for a lacI transgene in spermatogenic cells from young mice suggest that base excision repair activity is high in spermatogenic cell types. Notably, the spontaneous mutant frequency of the lacI transgene is greater in spermatogenic cells obtained from old mice, suggesting that germ line DNA repair activity may decline with age. A paternal age effect in spermatogenic cells is recognized for the human population as well. To determine if male germ cell base excision repair activity changes with age, uracil-DNA glycosylase-initiated base excision repair activity was measured in mixed germ cell (i.e., all spermatogenic cell types in adult testis) nuclear extracts prepared from young, middle-aged, and old mice. Base excision repair activity was also assessed in nuclear extracts from premeiotic, meiotic, and postmeiotic spermatogenic cell types obtained from young mice. Mixed germ cell nuclear extracts exhibited an age-related decrease in base excision repair activity that was restored by addition of apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease. Uracil-DNA glycosylase and DNA ligase were determined to be limiting in mixed germ cell nuclear extracts prepared from young animals. Base excision repair activity was only modestly elevated in pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids relative to other spermatogenic cells. Thus, germ line short-patch base excision repair activity appears to be relatively constant throughout spermatogenesis in young animals, limited by uracil-DNA glycosylase and DNA ligase in young animals, and limited by AP endonuclease in old animals.

Aging↗

Light and dark in chromatin repair: repair of UV-induced DNA lesions by photolyase and nucleotide excision repair.

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) and DNA repair by photolyase in the presence of light (photoreactivation) are the major pathways to remove UV-induced DNA lesions from the genome, thereby preventing mutagenesis and cell death. Photoreactivation was found in many prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, but not in mammals, while NER seems to be universally distributed. Since packaging of eukaryotic DNA in nucleosomes and higher order chromatin structures affects DNA structure and accessibility, damage formation and repair are coupled intimately to structural and dynamic properties of chromatin. Here, I review recent progress in the study of repair of chromatin and transcribed genes. Photoreactivation and NER are discussed as examples of how an individual enzyme and a complex repair pathway, respectively, access DNA lesions in chromatin and how these two repair processes fulfil complementary roles in removal of UV lesions. These repair pathways provide insight into the structural and dynamic properties of chromatin and suggest how other DNA repair processes could work in chromatin.

Chromatin↗

Subpathways of nucleotide excision repair and their regulation.

Nucleotide excision repair provides an important cellular defense against a large variety of structurally unrelated DNA alterations. Most of these alterations, if unrepaired, may contribute to mutagenesis, oncogenesis, and developmental abnormalities, as well as cellular lethality. There are two subpathways of nucleotide excision repair; global genomic repair (GGR) and transcription coupled repair (TCR), that is selective for the transcribed DNA strand in expressed genes. Some of the proteins involved in the recognition of DNA damage (including RNA polymerase) are also responsive to natural variations in the secondary structural features of DNA. Gratuitous repair events in undamaged DNA might then contribute to genomic instability. However, damage recognition enzymes for GGR are normally maintained at very low levels unless the cells are genomically stressed. GGR is controlled through the SOS stress response in E. coli and through the activated p53 tumor suppressor in human cells. These inducible responses in human cells are important, as they have been shown to operate upon chemical carcinogen DNA damage at levels to which humans are environmentally exposed. Interestingly, most rodent tissues are deficient in the p53-dependent GGR pathway. Since rodents are used as surrogates for environmental cancer risk assessment, it is essential that we understand how they differ from humans with respect to DNA repair and oncogenic responses to environmental genotoxins. In the case of terminally differentiated mammalian cells, a new paradigm has appeared in which GGR is attenuated but both strands of expressed genes are repaired efficiently.

Animals↗

Nucleotide excision repair endonuclease genes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the primary pathway for the removal of ultraviolet light-induced damage and bulky adducts from DNA in eukaryotes. During NER, the helix is unwound around the damaged site, and incisions are made on the 5' and 3' sides, to release an oligonucleotide carrying the lesion. Repair synthesis can then proceed, using the intact strand as a template. The incisions flanking the lesion are catalyzed by different structure-specific endonucleases. The 5' incision is made by a heterodimer of XPF and ERCC1 (Rad1p-Rad10p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae), and the 3' incision is made by XPG (Rad2p in S. cerevisiae). We previously showed that the Drosophila XPF homologue is encoded by the meiotic recombination gene mei-9. We report here the identification of the genes encoding the XPG and ERCC1 homologues (XPG(Dm) and ERCC1(Dm)). XPG(Dm) is encoded by the mus201 gene; we found frameshift mutations predicted to produce truncated XPG(Dm) proteins in each of two mus201 alleles. These mutations cause defects in nucleotide excision repair and hypersensitivity to alkylating agents and ultraviolet light, but do not cause hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation and do not impair viability or fertility. ERCC1(Dm) interacts strongly in a yeast two-hybrid assay with MEI-9, indicative of the presumed requirement for these polypeptides to dimerize to form the functional endonuclease. The Drosophila Ercc1 gene maps to polytene region 51D1-2. The nucleotide excision repair gene mus210 maps nearby (51E-F) but is distinct from Ercc1.

Alleles↗

Molecular mechanism of PCNA-dependent base excision repair.

In higher eukaryotes, base excision repair can proceed by two alternative pathways: a DNA polymerase beta-dependent pathway and a proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-dependent pathway. Recently, we have reconstituted the PCNA-dependent AP site repair reaction with six purified human proteins: AP endonuclease, replication factor C (RFC), PCNA, flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1), DNA polymerase delta (pol delta), and DNA ligase I. In this reconstituted system, the number of nucleotides replaced during the repair reaction (patch size) was predominantly two nucleotides. PCNA can directly interact with RFC, pol delta, FEN1 and DNA ligase I. These interactions are partly through a consensus motif, QXX(I/L/M)XX(F/H)(F/Y), found in each of the four proteins. PCNA functions as a molecular adaptor for recruiting these factors to the site of DNA repair. Two DNA-N-glycosylases among those so far cloned from human, UNG2 and MYH, are found to have the same PCNA-binding motif. Major substrates of these enzymes, a uracil opposite an adenine for UNG2 and an adenine opposite an 8-oxoguanine for MYH, are formed during DNA replication. Therefore, UNG2 and MYH may serve for replication-coupled base excision repair through the direct interaction with PCNA in the replication machinery.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

Nucleotide excision repair: from E. coli to man.

Nucleotide excision repair is both a 'wide spectrum' DNA repair pathway and the sole system for repairing bulky damages such as UV lesions or benzo[a]pyrene adducts. The mechanisms of nucleotide excision repair are known in considerable detail in Escherichia coli. Similarly, in the past 5 years important advances have been made towards understanding the biochemical mechanisms of excision repair in humans. The overall strategy of the repair is the same in the two species: damage recognition through a multistep mechanism involving a molecular matchmaker and an ATP-dependent unwinding of the damaged duplex; dual incisions at both sides of the lesion by two different nucleases, the 3' incision being followed by the 5'; removal of the damaged oligomer; resynthesis of the repair patch, whose length matches the gap size. Despite these similarities, the two systems are biochemically different and do not even share structural homology. E. coli excinuclease employs three proteins in contrast to 16/17 polypeptides in man; the excised fragment is longer in man: the procaryotic excinuclease is not able by itself to remove the excised oligomer whereas the human enzyme does. Thus, the excinuclease mode of action is well conserved throughout evolution, but not the biochemical tools: this represents a case of evolutionary convergence.

DNA Repair↗