PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Health Status Disparities”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Health care needs of medically underserved women of color: The role of the Bureau of Primary Health Care.

The Bureau of Primary Health Care (BPHC) was developed to increase access to comprehensive primary and preventive health care and to improve the health status of medically underserved populations. Approximately 43 million Americans fall into this category, and the majority are poor, female, young, and uninsured. Under the Public Health Services Act, BPHC does not provide direct services, but rather assist local communities in identifying populations at risk of poor health outcomes and helps these communities through various programs. One of the newest initiatives of BPHC is the Office of Minority and Women's Health, developed with a mission to help reduce the disparities in the health status of women of racial and ethnic minority populations. This article outlines these disparities and discusses proposals for reducing them.

Ethnicity↗
PubMed2004

Contrasting socioeconomic profiles related to healthier lifestyles in China and the United States.

Health disparity by socioeconomic status has recently become an important public health concern. Socioeconomic status may affect health status through several pathways including lifestyle choices. The authors tested the link between socioeconomic status and lifestyle in China (in 1993) and in the United States (in 1994-1996), countries with high contrasts in development, to understand health discrepancy issues cross-nationally. Healthfulness of lifestyle was measured using the Lifestyle Index, a summary score that integrates four key lifestyle factors: diet, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption. Income and education were used as indicators of socioeconomic status. In China, as socioeconomic status improved, lifestyle was less healthy (relative odds for the highest socioeconomic status group = 0.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.10, 0.35). Conversely, in the United States, higher socioeconomic status was related to a healthier lifestyle (relative odds for the highest socioeconomic status group = 3.81, 95% confidence interval: 2.94, 4.94). The contrasting relation between socioeconomic status and lifestyle depicts different phases of the lifestyle transition (changes in lifestyles accompanying economic development). The differences may in part explain why nutrition-related noncommunicable diseases are more prevalent in the developing world among people with a high socioeconomic status, whereas often the opposite is found in developed societies. Public health programs may benefit by advising each socioeconomic status group separately, while considering the country's level of development.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Disparities in chronic disease risk factors and health status between American Indian/Alaska Native and White elders: findings from a telephone survey, 2001 and 2002.

We compared prevalence estimates of chronic disease risk factors and health status between American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) and White elders. We used 2001 and 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data to estimate the prevalence of smoking, physical inactivity, obesity, diagnosed diabetes, and general health status. For all health behavior and status measures, American Indians/Alaska Natives reported greater risk than did Whites. Risk factors among AIAN elders need to be addressed to eliminate disparities in chronic diseases.

Alaska↗
PubMed2001

The impact of universal access to dental care on disparities in caries experience in children.

BACKGROUND: The authors investigated the association between socioeconomic status and the severity of dental caries in 6- and 7-year-old children who had had access to dental care throughout their lives. The children had lived since birth in Nova Scotia, Canada, a province with a universal publicly financed dental care program. METHODS: The authors selected a representative sample of first-grade children using a stratified multistage sampling method of primary schools (n = 1,614). The response rate was 78.8 percent. Two dentists were trained to diagnose dental caries using modified World Health Organization criteria. Intra- and interexaminer reliability was excellent (kappa > or = 0.88). Of the children who were examined (n = 1,271), 955 were lifelong residents of Nova Scotia, Canada, and so were included in this analysis. Data were weighted and adjusted for clustering (design) effects. RESULTS: Only 8.4 percent of the children had visited a dental office before the age of 2 years, and 88.5 percent of the children had their first dental visit between the ages of 2 and 5 years. Children whose parents had completed a university education had a significantly lower mean number of decayed, missing and filled surfaces, or dmfs, in their primary teeth than did children whose parents had a lower education level. A Poisson regression model indicated that parents' high education status, optimal fluoride concentration in schools' water supplies, daily toothbrushing and dental visits for checkup were significantly associated with low dmfs scores. CONCLUSION: Having access to a universal publicly financed dental insurance program since birth did not eliminate the disparities in caries experience. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This analysis of a highly utilized universal dental insurance program suggests that disparities in oral health status cannot be reduced solely by providing universal access to dental care. Focused efforts by professional and governmental organizations should be directed toward understanding the socioeconomic, behavioral and community determinants of oral health disparities.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Explaining variation in health status across space and time: implications for racial and ethnic disparities in self-rated health.

We use the Metropolitan Community Information Center-Metro Survey-a serial cross section of adults residing in the City of Chicago, USA, conducted from 1991 through 1999-in combination with 1990 census data to simultaneously examine the extent to which self-rated health varies across Chicago neighborhoods and across time. Three-level hierarchical logit models are employed to decompose individual, spatial, and temporal variance in self-rated health. Results indicate that variation in self-rated health across neighborhoods is explained, in part, by variation in the level of neighborhood affluence. Neighborhood level poverty, however, is not a significant predictor of self-rated health. Community level affluence, moreover, accounts for a substantial proportion of the residual health deficit experienced by African-Americans when compared with Whites (after controlling for individual level SES). The effects of affluence hold when controlling for spatial autocorrelation and when considered in primarily African-American neighborhoods. Findings also indicate that individuals living in the City of Chicago became significantly healthier over the decade of the 1990s, and that this improvement in health is explained largely by the increasing education and income levels of Chicago residents.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Racial disparities in sense of community and health status: implications in community-based participatory interventions targeting chronic disease in African Americans.

This study examined the relation between sense of community (SOC), sociodemographic characteristics, and health status to inform community-based interventions designed to prevent and reduce chronic disease in African Americans. A telephone survey was conducted with 1463 randomly selected residents in Nashville, Tenn. Respondents were majority female (69%), African American (59%), and single (59%), with a mean age of 55 (+/-17.61 years). African Americans have lower overall SOC scores, or lower scores on the domains related to perceived influence over community and sharing of common community values compared to Whites. High rates of chronic disease and low SES, combined with a low SOC, can hinder efforts to reduce and eliminate disparities. The goal of community-based participatory initiatives is to create programs that are sustainable by the target community after the funding is gone. Thus, to maximize the success, uptake, and sustainability of disease-specific interventions, it is imperative to incorporate assessment of SOC, identify factors that depress SOC, and engage in community collaboration to develop a plan to improve SOC.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of health status indicators in chicago: are Black-White disparities worsening?

OBJECTIVES: This study examined Chicago residents' progress toward the Healthy People 2000 goal of reducing racial disparities in health and compared the results with a recent analysis of US data. METHODS: Non-Hispanic Black-to-non-Hispanic White rate ratios were computed for 14 health status indicators for 1990 and for 1998. RESULTS: Nationally and in Chicago, indicators for both Blacks and Whites improved between 1990 and 1998; however, Whites consistently fared better. Nationally, gaps narrowed on 10 indicators; for Chicago, they widened on 10 indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Nationally, there is apparent progress in reducing Black-White disparities; this is not true for Chicago. Whether failure to reduce racial disparities is unique to Chicago or is common to other urban centers remains an open question with important implications.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

The disparity change score: a new methodology to examine health disparities in New Mexico.

OBJECTIVES: One overarching goal of Healthy People 2010 is to eliminate health disparities. Reducing disparities improves the overall health status of a population but is a lengthy process. The disparity change score (DCS) is a method for tracking health disparities over time. METHODS: Rates, rate ratios, and DCSs were calculated to track disparities during two time periods by sex, race/ethnicity, education, and income for key health indicators. Time periods were 10 years apart for all death indicators; length between time periods varied for other indicators depending on data collection systems. RESULTS: Sex-, race/ethnicity-, education-, and income-based disparities and disparity changes for New Mexico were identified. In general, males, American Indians, and those with the lowest income and education experienced the greatest health disparities. Five disparities that are worsening were identified for targeted interventions, mainly for males (firearm-related death and suicide) and American Indians (diabetes death and influenza/pneumonia death), but also for white non-Hispanics (drug-related death). CONCLUSIONS: Examining disparities at one point in time discounts disparity change over time. The DCS can help identify large disparities that are worsening and toward which resources for targeted interventions can be redirected. New Mexico should consider interventions for the five key disparities identified in this study.

Ethnicity↗
PubMed2006

Gradients in the health status and developmental risks of young children: the combined influences of multiple social risk factors.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze child vulnerability as a profile of multiple risk factors for poorer health based on race/ethnicity, social class (maternal education and family poverty status), child health insurance coverage, and maternal mental health. Profiles are examined in relation to disparities in the health status and developmental risks of young children. DATA SOURCES: Cross-sectional data on 2,068 children ages 4-35 months from the 2000 National Survey of Early Childhood Health. STUDY DESIGN: Multiple logistic regression models are used to examine risk profiles in relation to child health status and developmental risk (based on parent concerns about development). The profiles are also examined in relation to three measures of basic access to health care: telephone contact with a physician, well-child visit in the past year, and missed or delayed needed care. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: About one-third of (or 3.1 million) young children in the United States have two or more risk factors (RF) for poor health. Controlling for other family factors, having more RFs is associated with poorer health status (i.e., percent reported "good/fair/poor" vs. "excellent/very good") and being higher risk for developmental delays. For example, the likelihood of having either poorer health or higher developmental risk increases with each RF (vs. zero): 1 RF (OR = 1.70, CI: 1.20-2.38), 2 RFs (OR = 3.28, CI: 2.27-4.73), 3 RFs (OR = 4.69, CI: 2.84-7.73), 4 RFs (OR = 14.58, CI: 4.98-42.64). Higher RFs were also associated with poorer health care access. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a dose-response relationship of higher risk profiles with poorer child health status and higher developmental risk. Because children with higher profiles of risk are also more likely to lack access to care, this suggests that children who most need care have the greatest difficulty obtaining it. Addressing health gradients for vulnerable children will require explicit attention to these multiple, overlapping risk factors.

Black or African American↗
PubMed2006

Disparities in primary care for vulnerable children: the influence of multiple risk factors.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze vulnerability as a profile of multiple risk factors for poor pediatric care based on race/ethnicity, poverty status, parent education, insurance, and language. Profiles are used to examine disparities in child/adolescent health status and primary care experience. DATA SOURCES: Cross-sectional data on 19,485 children/adolescents 0-19 years of age from the 2001 California Health Interview Survey. STUDY DESIGN: Multiple logistic regression models are used to examine risk profiles in relation to health status and three aspects of primary care: access (physician and dental visit; access surety), continuity (regular source of care), and comprehensiveness (i.e., health promotion counseling). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: About 43 percent of (or 4.4 million) children in California have two or more risk factors (RF). Controlling for age and gender, more RFs is associated with poorer health status (i.e. percent reporting "excellent/very good" health: no RFs=81 percent, 1=71 percent, 2=57 percent, 3=45 percent, 4=35 percent, 5=28 percent, all p<.001). Controlling for health status, higher risk profiles is associated with poorer primary care access and continuity, but greater comprehensiveness of care. For example, higher risk profile children are less likely to have a regular source of care: one RF (prevalence ratio [PR]=0.92, confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-0.98), two (PR=0.77, CI: 0.69-0.84), three (PR=0.55, CI: 0.46-0.65), and four or more (PR=0.31, CI: 0.22-0.44), all p<.001. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a dose-response relationship of higher risk profiles with poorer child health status, access to, and continuity of primary care. Having gained access, however, adolescents with higher risk profiles are more likely to receive health promotion counseling. Higher profiles appear to be associated with greater barriers to accessing primary care for children in "fair or poor" health, suggesting that vulnerable children who have the greatest health care needs also have the greatest difficulty obtaining primary care.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Pediatric dental visits during 1996: an analysis of the federal Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Pediatric health policy articulated by the government, health professions, and child advocates is concerned with eliminating health disparities among children and increasing access to essential pediatric health services. National data are widely available on dental health status and associated disparities by income and race, but little data have been reported on dental service utilization by children. Data from the 1996 federal Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were analyzed to determine the percentage of children who obtained a dental visit and the number of visits children experienced by age, sex, ethnic/racial background, family income, and parental education. Overall, 43% of all children ages birth through 18 obtained at least one dental visit in 1996. Among children who see a dentist, the average number of visits during 1996 was 2.7. Low income, low education, and minority status are all associated with both lower odds of having a dental visit and lower number of visits per utilizer. Children under 6 had less than half the dental visit rate of older children and had fewer visits per person among utilizers.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Redressing wounds: finding a legal framework to remedy racial disparities in medical care.

In recent years, numerous medical studies and reports have documented startling disparities between the health status of African Americans and White Americans. The literature is replete with evidence that one of the main causes of these racial disparities is the different treatment of patients of different racial groups. This Comment addresses the possibility that implicit cognitive bias, in the form of implicit attitudes and stereotypes, significantly contributes to these racial disparities in medical treatment. Finding existing legal frameworks inadequate to address current disparities in health care, this Comment recommends avenues for the reworking of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, it suggests that disparate-treatment provisions that encompass claims arising from unintentional discrimination should be incorporated into Title VI, and it offers the employment law frameworks of Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act as models for such reform.

Black or African American↗
PubMed1988

Differences in physician prevention practice patterns for white and minority patients.

A telephone survey of 120 randomly selected primary care physicians in New York City was completed in October, 1984 (response rate = 90%) concerning physicians' recommendations for health promotion and disease prevention. Responses from physicians with 50% or more Black and Hispanic patients were compared with responses from physicians with 50% or more White patients. The former were found to be less likely to follow guidelines from nationally recognized organizations for health promotion and disease prevention, although they were just as likely to value the importance of prevention in primary care. For example, physicians with predominantly Black and Hispanic patient populations were significantly less likely to recommend screening mammography (7% versus 23%) or recommend influenza vaccination for patients 65 or older (48% versus 74%) when compared with physicians with predominantly White patient populations. Factors that appeared to contribute to the difference in prevention practice patterns include physician training and education, the socioeconomic status of the patients, and the time physicians spend with patients. Differences in quality of preventive care provided to minority patients may be an additional factor in the disparity between the health status of White and non-White Americans.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies.

Socioeconomic status (SES) underlies three major determinants of health: health care, environmental exposure, and health behavior. In addition, chronic stress associated with lower SES may also increase morbidity and mortality. Reducing SES disparities in health will require policy initiatives addressing the components of socioeconomic status (income, education, and occupation) as well as the pathways by which these affect health. Lessons for U.S. policy approaches are taken from the Acheson Commission in England, which was charged with reducing health disparities in that country.

Delivery of Health Care↗
PubMed2006

Factors associated with patients' perceptions of health care providers' communication behavior.

We examined patients' ratings of communication with health care providers by sociodemographic characteristics, health care access, and health status. Data were from a national, population-based survey, the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). The survey was administered to 6,369 adults from a representative sample of U.S. households. Linear regression analysis was conducted using SUDAAN. None of the sociodemographic variables were significantly associated with patients' ratings of providers' communication behavior in the linear model. Ratings of health care providers' communication behavior, however, were significantly higher among respondents with health insurance (p = 0.007) and those with a usual source of health care from whom they consistently sought care (p < 0.001). Ratings of provider communication were significantly lower among respondents who perceived their general health to be fair or poor (p < 0.001) and among those respondents with greater depressive symptoms (p < 0.001). Differences in patient ratings of health care providers' communication by health care access and health status suggest the potential for disparities in health outcomes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Informal care and the empowerment of minority communities: comparisons between the USA and the UK.

This paper examines informal care and the empowerment of minority communities with respect to health care and health promotion in the USA and the UK based upon work prepared for the workshop, 'Involving Black and Minority Ethnic Users in Delivery of Services and Empowering Communities' presented during the bi-national 1997 USA, UK. Conference, 'Health Gain for Black and Minority Ethnic Communities' and the information gained from that Conference. 'Informal care' is operationally defined as 'the practice of alleviating distressful physiological and psychological dysfunctions through all others (e.g. traditional healers, family members, self, etc.) using measures that do not require a physician's prescription or intervention (e.g. lifestyle modifications) typically outside of formal, institutionally based care mechanisms (e.g. homes and communities). Informal care is a significant force in health maintenance, health promotion, and disease prevention. In the USA, at least one-third of the population is estimated to engage in unconventional medical practices, and perhaps, one-half of racial/ethnic populations use informal care. An enormous potential exists to better utilize informal care because informal care is culturally more compatible, relatively low cost, and flexible. The policy of the Indian Health Service in accepting the use of traditional medicine was cited. The US Congress recognized the potential of alternative medicine by establishing such an Office within the National Institutes of Health. 'Empowerment of racial/ethnic minority communities is the right for minority populations to determine their own destinies. In the USA, racial/ethnic minority populations are Blacks, Hispanics, Asians or Pacific Islanders, and American Indian/Alaska Native. These classifications are based upon self-report; in the UK, the black and minority classifications are based upon countries of birth rather than self-reported racial/ethnic identities. Empowerment of these communities is important both demographically and historically. In demographic terms, racial/ethnic minority populations are increasing at higher rates than the majority population in the USA and hence, the health status of minorities will become the health status of the nation in the next half century. Historically, racial/ethnic minorities have not been empowered. As a consequence of the 1985 Secretary's Task Force Report on Black and Minority Health Federal measures to address disparities in the health status of minorities were initiated. In March 1994, the UK Government initiated the Ethnic Health Unit within the National Health Service. These measures are not mature enough to evaluate their impact. However, progress in implementing measures to empower minorities in the UK have begun and are illustrated by the work reported by Dr Pui-Ling Li, the UK counterpart to the workshop, 'Involving Black and Minority Ethnic Users in Delivery of Services and Empowering Communities'. Recommendations are made to increase use of informal care and the empowerment for racial/ethnic minority communities and to build upon the works in progress in both the USA and the UK.

Complementary Therapies↗