SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Inlays”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

PubMed1989

[Risks and benefits of polymeric inlays].

Class I inlays were produced according to the direct method using six white light-cured composite, one inlay material and one veneer acrylic. They were subjected to extraoral heat treatment at 125 degrees C for 150 s. In addition, heat-cured inlays were produced according to the indirect method. In all cases heat treatment resulted in a considerable increase in transverse strength and modulus of elasticity as well as a material specific decrease in the specimen volume between 0.15% and 1.05%, and it facilitated finishing. With one exception heat-treated and heat-cured inlays could be inserted without open margins; even 5000 threshold load cycles of 500 N failed to cause marginal defects. However, these inlays also had no open margins when inserted without previous heat treatment. While in the case of four materials this resulted in no measurable reduction in fatigue strength, it reduced this value to a maximum of 100 N in three materials. Swelling of the polymeric inlays due to high water absorption resulted in extensive enamel cracks with one of the materials tested.

Acrylic Resins↗

PubMed2002

Relative motion of a mobile bearing inlay after total knee arthroplasty--dynamic in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure the in vitro range of motion of a mobile bearing inlay knee prosthesis under dynamic isokinetic loading conditions. Additionally, the effect on the range of motion of rotational malalignment of the tibia baseplate was determined. DESIGN: Specimens with implanted knee prostheses were mounted onto a custom built knee simulator. 3-D inlay movement was measured by an ultrasonic tracking system. BACKGROUND: More recent knee prostheses include mobile bearing inlays type designs. These systems are intended to allow higher conformity of the tibiofemoral joint and thereby decrease contact stress without decreasing the knee's range of motion. METHODS: Dynamic testing in the knee simulator mimicked both the speed and resulting moment of a knee isokinetic extension test. The tibia baseplate was first implanted with no rotational malalignment, followed by sequential internal and external rotation of upto 15 degrees. RESULTS: Correctly aligned, the inlay center moved 3.5 mm (SD, 1.5 mm) posterior during extension. With the tibia baseplate externally rotated more than 10 degrees the movement pattern changed. CONCLUSION: At up to 10 degrees of rotational malalignment the primary motion pattern of the mobile bearing is maintained. However, beyond 10 degrees unintended motion may occur. RELEVANCE: These test results correlate to radiographic measurements of in vivo movements of mobile bearing inlays showing "paradoxical" movement of the mobile inlay compared to physiologic meniscal movement.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

PubMed2007

Dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty for primary hypospadiac repair.

OBJECTIVE: Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty has become a popular technique for repairing distal and proximal hypospadias in many institutions. Dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty has been used in our institution since 2003 to reduce the risk of meatal stenosis. In the present study, we evaluated the results of the dorsal inlay graft procedure. METHODS: A total of 28 patients with no deep groove and no severe curvature underwent one-stage urethroplasty using an inner preputial-based dorsal inlay graft. The medical records of all patients were retrospectively reviewed with regard to complication rate and cosmetic appearance. RESULTS: Mean patient age at surgery was 21 months (range, 14 months to 4.6 years). Preoperatively the urethral meatus was coronal in two cases, distal shaft in 17, proximal shaft in six and penoscrotal in three. Nine patients required testosterone therapy before surgery. Mean operative time was 200 min (range, 154-249 min). Mean length of inlay graft was 20.9 mm (range, 12-30 mm). In all patients, a straight penis was achieved without dorsal plication of the corposa cavernosa, and the neomeatus with a slit-like appearance was positioned at the glans tip. At a mean of 22 months of follow up, a urethrocutaneous fistula developed in only one patient (3.6%), requiring repair surgery 6 months after urethroplasty. No patient had meatal stenosis, neourethral stricture or urethral diverticulum along the inlay graft. CONCLUSION: Dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty is an effective method for hypospadiac repair and leads to good cosmetic outcome with low risk of complications.

Child, Preschool↗

PubMed2000

Comparison of migration in modular sockets with ceramic and polyethylene inlays.

This study compared migration in 73 cementless total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with either alumina ceramic (n = 23) or polyethylene (n = 50) inlays; prosthesis sockets and stems were identical except for the inlays. After 7 years of follow-up, 5 sockets (4 with ceramic and 1 with polyethylene inlays) had been revised an average of 63.3 months (range: 49-81 months) after implantation, and survival analysis showed a significantly higher revision rate for sockets with ceramic inlays (89 +/- 6%) versus polyethylene inlays (98.2 +/- 1.7%) (P = .032). Migration analysis of the first three postoperative years revealed significantly higher vertical migration in sockets with ceramic inlays (P = .047), in patients aged <60 years (P = .02), and in osteoporotic type C bone (A versus C, P = .0071 and B versus C, P = .0004).

Ceramics↗

PubMed1997

Clinical and quantitative marginal analysis of feldspathic ceramic inlays at 4 years.

The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate feldspathic ceramic inlays both by clinical criteria and quantitative margin analysis in continuation of an earlier, identically conducted 2-year study. Fifty feldspathic ceramic inlays were adhesively luted in Class II preparations with all margins located in enamel. The inlays were evaluated clinically according to modified USPHS criteria after 3 and 4 years. Quantitative margin analysis was performed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Clinically, the inlays showed no recurrent caries and no changes in colour, but superficial marginal discolouration (6%) was apparent after 4 years. Margins were perceptible clinically in 64% of the cases after 4 years. Quantitative margin analysis showed significantly more marginal gaps at the composite/ceramic interface than at the enamel/composite interface, There was neither a significant decrease in perfect margins nor a significant increase in marginal gaps and marginal imperfections at both interfaces between the third and fourth year. Clinically, the inlays performed very well up to 4 years. Clinical evaluation using an explorer only detected substance loss in the cementation gap. The SEM evaluation showed significantly higher changes in marginal qualities during the first 2-year interval of clinical service compared to the second 2-year interval following an exponential mathematical regularity. Quantitative margin analysis should be included in clinical long-term trials to detect early marginal deficiencies at the luting interfaces.

Aluminum Silicates↗

PubMed1998

Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years.

This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical performance of 287 all-ceramic restorations placed during routine patient care in the University setting in the past 7 years. All patients (n = 106) with ceramic inlays or partial ceramic crowns (PCC), placed during 1988-1994 (n = 327) by five experienced dentists were asked to take part in a clinical investigation, and 92 patients with 287 restorations (232 inlays, 55 PCC) agreed to do so. The following ceramics were used: 44 (15.3%) Dicor (Dentsply), 126 (43.9%) IPS-Empress (Ivoclar), 82 (28.7%) Mirage II, 33 (11.5%) Cerec-Vita-Mark 1 (Vita), and 2 (0.7%) Duceram LFC (Ducera) restorations. The restorations were placed using the following luting composites: 73 (25.4%) Dual Cure Luting Cement (Optec), 81 (28.3%) Variolink high viscosity (Ivoclar), 32 (11.1%) Microfill Pontic C (Kulzer), 51 (17.8%) Dual Zement (Ivoclar), 40 (13.9%) Dicor Light Activated Cement (Dentsply), and 10 (3.5%) Vita Cerec Duo Cement (Vita). Restorations were evaluated according to the modified USPHS criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate the probability of survival. Of the 287 restorations 270 (94.2%) were still in function without any need of intervention. Fourteen restorations (4.8%) had failed before starting the clinical investigation, and in three a fracture was found during the investigation. These 17 failed restorations consisted of 14 PCC and 3 ceramic inlays. The results of the clinical investigation revealed 59.2% Alpha-ratings for marginal adaptation. Only one restored tooth showed recurrent caries. The probability of survival (95% confidence interval) for 7 years was 98% (97.99-98.01%) for ceramic inlays and 56% (46-66%) for PCC. Our findings show that ceramic inlays can be regarded as an acceptable alternative to cast gold restorations within the methodological limitations of the present study. For PCC further experience with more recent ceramics is warranted.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Wear and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlays.

MOD inlays were made with conventional, coarse hybrid, fine hybrid, and two microfilled composite resins. They were adhesively luted in six extracted human molars for each group and were subjected to longitudinal, in vitro testing. Final wear ranged from 46.8 +/- 18.6 microns for fine hybrid composite resin to 132.0 +/- 39.3 microns for conventional composite resin for the inlays and from 19.3 +/- 6.6 microns for homogeneous microfilled composite resin to 136.3 +/- 65.1 microns for coarse hybrid composite resin on enamel antagonists. The wear of the luting composite resins ranged from 11.2 +/- 11.2 microns to 20.0 +/- 23.6 microns. Marginal adaptation at the beginning of the test exceeded 88.7% of "continuous margin" for all groups in enamel. However, marginal gaps were evident in dentin without dentinal adhesives. Marginal adaptation of the microfilled composite resin inlays deteriorated during loads even when a dentinal adhesive and an inlay primer were used. The margins of the other composite resin inlays remained stable during load application.

Acrylic Resins↗

PubMed2004

Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the in-vitro marginal adaptation of all-ceramic class II inlays which were luted with conventional multi-stage pre-treatment cements and one new type of cement, which requires no conditioning. METHODS: The marginal adaptation of 56 all-ceramic inlays was determined with scanning electron microscopy and microleakage tests. The marginal integrity of each tooth was evaluated at cement-dentin and cement-enamel junctions, with regard to the transitions between tooth-cement and cement-inlay. The inlays were luted on human molars with two resin cements, one compomer, one resin modified glass-ionomer and one new resin cement in accordance with the manufacture's recommended pre-treatment. Light- and chemical-curing modifications were investigated. All tests were performed after thermal cycling and mechanical loading (TCML). RESULTS: For the resin cements and the new material the marginal integrity was higher than 90% before and after TCML. The marginal adaptation was between 55-80% for the resin modified glass-ionomer and lower than 20% for the compomer. The microleakage was lower than 20% for all cements, only the compomer showed values up to 100% penetration. SIGNIFICANCE: The difference in marginal integrity between the new universal resin cement without any tooth pre-treatment and conventional resin cements after total-etching, priming and bonding was not significant. Resin GIC may be used with restrictions and compomer cement should not be used with all-ceramic class II inlay restorations.

Compomers↗

PubMed2005

Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.

OBJECTIVE: Ceramic inlays and onlays are a tooth colored alternative to metallic restorations. Clinical long-term data are scarce though, especially about inlays and onlays having proximal margins in dentin. The present prospective controlled clinical study evaluated the clinical performance of IPS Empress inlays and onlays with cuspal replacements and proximal margins below the cementoenamel junction over eight years. METHODS: Ninety six ceramic restorations were placed in 34 patients by six dentists. The restorations were bonded with an enamel/dentin bonding system (Syntac Classic) and four different resin composite systems. The restorations were assessed after placement by two calibrated investigators using modified USPHS codes and criteria at the following time periods: baseline, 1,2,4,6 and 8 years. RESULTS: Eight of the 96 restorations investigated had to be replaced (failure rate 8%; Kaplan-Meier): Six inlays suffered cohesive bulk fractures, two teeth required endodontic treatment. After eight years of clinical service, significant deterioration (Friedman 2-way ANOVA; P < 0.05) was found for marginal adaptation of the remaining restorations. 98% of the surviving restorations exhibited marginal deficiencies, independent of the luting composite. CONCLUSIONS: IPS Empress inlays and onlays demonstrated to be successful even in large defects. Neither the absence of enamel margins, nor cuspal replacement significantly affected the quality of the restorations.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Human pulp response to resin cements used to bond inlay restorations.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pulp response following cementation of inlays using two different resin cements. METHODS: Deep Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of 34 sound human premolars. Impressions were taken and inlays were prepared which were cemented with the following luting materials-Group 1: Rely X Unicem (3M ESPE); Group 2: Variolink II (Ivoclar Vivadent). In Group 3 (control), after lining the cavity floor with Dycal (Dentsply Caulk) the inlays were cemented with Rely X Unicem. Four additional teeth were used as an intact control group. For Variolink II, the adhesive system Excite was used as part of the cementation procedure. After 7 or 60 days, the teeth were extracted and processed for histological assessment. RESULTS: At 7 days, Rely X Unicem and Variolink II system triggered in two samples a mild and moderate inflammatory response, respectively. At 60 days, the pulpal response decreased for both groups. A discrete persistent inflammatory response occurred in Group 2 in which displacement of resin components across the dentin tubules was observed. In the control group, normal histological characteristics were observed. The inflammatory response and tissue disorganization were related to the remaining dentin thickness between the cavity floor and the pulp tissue. SIGNIFICANCE: Techniques for inlay cementation using distinct luting cements may cause specific pulpal damage. Variolink II associated with the adhesive system Excite cause more aggressive effects to the pulp-dentin complex than Rely X Unicem cement when both are used to cement inlay restorations.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Longevity of ceramic inlays and onlays luted with a solely light-curing composite resin.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the longevity of heat-pressed glass ceramic inlays and onlays luted with solely light-curing composite resin. METHODS: The records of patients who had received a ceramic inlay or onlay at the Heidelberg University Department of Conservative Dentistry from 1993 to 2002 were evaluated. The mean observation time and the survival probability of the ceramic inlays and onlays was calculated with the aid of the Kaplan-Meier algorithm. This was done for the total number of all restorations as well as for various subgroups (number of surfaces, tooth type, endodontic condition at the time that the ceramic restoration was incorporated, experience of operator). The log-rank test was used to compare groups and look for significant differences, and p<0.05 was set to be statistically significant. In addition, 95% confidence intervals of the survival probability values were computed. RESULTS: At the time of the last observation, 783 (96.7%) of these restorations were still in place. The mean observation period for all ceramic restorations was 17.3 months (SD 20.2), with an observation interval of between 0 and 116 months. The last loss of a ceramic restoration was observed 45 months after it had been placed, so that the survival probability of all ceramic restorations amounted to p=0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.86-0.94) from this time onward. Factors such as endodontic condition of tooth, type of tooth, position of tooth, extent of restoration, experience of operator or gender of patient had no significant influence on the survival probability of the ceramic restorations. CONCLUSIONS: Heat-pressed glass ceramic inlays and onlays can be used successfully in routine clinical therapy. In addition, this type of inlays and onlays can be placed successfully with solely light-curing composite resin.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: intact, prepared, and restored human maxillary premolars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty intact, noncarious human maxillary premolars were divided into 5 groups of 10 and were mounted with their roots imbedded in autopolymerized acrylic. In the first group, the teeth were intact with no preparation. In the other 4 groups, Class II MOD preparations were made with a water-cooled high-speed hand piece. In 1 group, the cavity preparations were restored with bonded CAD/CAM ceramic inlays. In 2 groups, the preparations were restored with bonded CAD/CAM composite inlays (acid etched or air particle abraded). In the final group, the teeth were prepared but unrestored. Specimens were tested individually in a universal testing machine, in which a 4.82-mm-diameter steel sphere plunger was mounted in the crosshead moving at 0.5 mm/min. The plunger contacted the facial and lingual triangular ridges beyond the margins of the restorations. Peak load to fracture (N) was measured for each specimen. Means were calculated and analyzed with analysis of variance (P</=.05). RESULTS: MOD preparations weakened the teeth by approximately 59%. Restoring the teeth with ceramic or composite inlays did not significantly strengthen the teeth under this testing system. Of the restored teeth, those restored with indirect composite inlays cemented following manufacturer's recommendations had the highest fracture resistance. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, under static compression load testing, bonded inlay restorations did not strengthen maxillary premolars with large MOD preparations.

Bicuspid↗

PubMed2003

Effects of two preparation designs and pontic distance on bending and fracture strength of fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Joint fractures observed in Targis/Vectris inlay adhesive fixed restorations may be related to the preparation design. PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated the effects of the proximal tooth preparation design and the pontic distance on the fracture strength and the amount of bending of fiber-reinforced inlay adhesive fixed partial dentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted premolars and 40 molars were embedded in a PMMA resin to represent a premolar and molar mesiodistal separation distance of 7 mm and 11 mm, respectively. Two preparation designs were used (proximal box and tub-shaped). The sample size was 10 for each group. Fiber-reinforced inlay adhesive fixed partial dentures were fabricated by use of the Targis/Vectris system and luted adhesively to the teeth with Variolink luting agent. A vertical force was loaded to the center of the fixed partial dentures at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The initial bending (mm) prior to fracture was evaluated by measuring the distance the test rod moved from a 10 N preload to fracture. The differences in the mean fracture strength and the average amount of bending as a function of the preparation designs and pontic distances were compared by use of a 2-way analysis of variance (alpha=.05). The specimens were examined optically for the type of failure with a stereomicroscope. The fracture surface of the specimens was examined by scanning electron microscopy, and radiography was used to investigate the surface morphological features at the failure sites and to determine the fracture mode. A chi-square test was used to identify the differences in the debonding rates between the types of preparation designs and the pontic distance (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The mean fracture strength and the standard deviation of the fiber-reinforced inlay retained adhesive fixed partial denture group was 1368+/-212 N for the 7-mm tub group, 885+/-109 N for the 11-mm tub group, 1779+/-317 N for the 7-mm box group, and 1336+/-281 N for the 11-mm box group. The fracture strength was significantly higher in the 7-mm pontic distance (P<.001) and for the box-shaped tooth preparation (P<.001). The amount of bending was significantly greater in the 7-mm pontic distance (P=.025) and the box-shaped tooth preparation (P=.002). Debonding was observed only in premolar teeth and tub-shaped design groups. CONCLUSION: The box-shaped tooth preparation may be considered for restoration of a missing single posterior tooth with fiber-reinforced inlay adhesive fixed partial dentures.

Adhesiveness↗

PubMed2001

Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the effect of the different viscosities of two resin luting cements on microleakage of ceramic inlays at dentinal margins. The effect of the width of the space between inlay and tooth, on the quality of the marginal seal was also investigated. METHODS: Mesial and distal class V cavities were prepared in 48 extracted third molars. The incisal margins of the cavities were in enamel and the cervical margins in dentin. Subsequently, Empress inlays with different cervical margin gap dimensions were fabricated. The mean cervical gap dimensions in the respective groups were as follows: group 1 (27 microm); group 2 (232 microm); group 3 (406 microm). Half the inlays in each group (16) were cemented with a low viscous resin luting cement, and half (16) with a highly viscous resin luting cement. The teeth were subjected to occlusal loading with synchronized thermal cycling in a masticatory simulator. Then, the specimens were immersed in basic fuchsin solution, and dye penetration along the cavity walls was measured. In addition, marginal adaptation was analyzed in the SEM at baseline and after loading, using a replica technique. RESULTS: With regard to dye penetration at dentinal margins, the highly viscous cement performed statistically significantly better at dentin/composite margins than the low viscous cement (p=0.0158). These findings are supported by SEM analysis. SIGNIFICANCE: It is assumed that polymerization stress within the luting cement could not be completely compensated for by larger luting spaces. Highly viscous luting cements are recommended for cementing class V inlays in larger luting spaces.

Aluminum Silicates↗

PubMed2003

Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system.

OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to observe the efficacy of two different composite cements on the prevention of marginal deterioration around adhesive ceramic inlay restorations, under laboratory conditions, and to test the null hypothesis that different luting procedures cannot affect sealing ability of luted inlays. METHODS: Twenty-six standardized mesio-occlusal Class II cavities were prepared in extracted posterior teeth. Class II inlays were fabricated with IPS Empress II system following the manufacturer's instructions. The samples were divided into two groups of 13 teeth each at random. Group 1: The ceramic inlays of Group 1 were luted using Excite DSC and an experimental self-curing resin cement (Multilink, Vivadent); in this group, Excite DSC was self-activated and not light-cured. Group 2: Excite DSC in combination with a dual-curing resin cement (Variolink II, Vivadent) was used (as control). In this group Excite DSC was light-cured for 20s separately, before resin cement application. The 'wet' bonding technique was followed. Three samples of each group were selected at random for SEM observations, while the other 10 samples were processed for marginal leakage. The bonding mechanism to dentin and resin cement thickness was evaluated. RESULTS: Samples of both groups showed resin tag and adhesive lateral branch formation. In Group 1 the hybrid layer was mainly uniform along the interface between dental substrates and adhesive material, and resin cement thickness was between 20 and 85 microm. At the cervical margin no gap was detected. In Group 2 the cement thickness was between 30 and 110 microm and hybrid layer formation was observed along the interface but at the cervical margin it was not always uniform and continuous. Resin tag formation was uniform in both groups. At cervical margins, 80% of Group 1 samples showed a perfect seal at the dentin-cementum margins, and 90% at enamel margins. Group 2 samples showed only 50% of cervical margins free from leakage and 80% at the occlusal enamel margins. Statistically significant differences were found at cervical margins between the two groups, while no significant differences were found at enamel site. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that the self-curing adhesive-resin cement combination can properly seal Class II porcelain inlays.

Dental Bonding↗

PubMed2000

Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To determine at 5 year follow-up the failure rate, wear rates and other aspects of clinical performance of direct composite inlays compared with conventional composite restorations placed incrementally. METHODS: 100 matched pairs of restorations were originally entered into the trial. Each pair consisted of a direct composite inlay and a conventional composite restoration made from the same material. At 5 years it was possible to recall 65 pairs, of which 54 were complete. Clinical assessments were made using USPHS criteria (indirect measurements of occlusal wear were made using Ivoclar standard dies) and annual bite wing radiographs. RESULTS: There was a trend to more failure of inlays than conventional composites (17.4 c.f. 7.5%) but this was not significant. The clinical performance of both types of restoration was similar and compared favourably with the results of studies of other materials. Secondary decay was diagnosed in only one restoration. Between 3 and 5 years there was some deterioration in cavo-marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation (occlusally) and surface roughness (occlusally). There was no apparent deterioration in colour match, proximal contact, shim stock contacts and Gingival Index. Wear rates of both types of restoration showed no significant difference and were essentially linear with a mean of 33-34 microm per year. CONCLUSIONS: Both inlays and conventional composite restorations complied with ADA specification minimum requirements for posterior composite restorations. In this study the direct inlay technique gave no clinical advantage over conventional, incremental placement.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years--a clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: Ceramic inlays are used as esthetic alternatives to amalgam and other metallic materials for the restoration of badly damaged teeth. However, only limited clinical data are available regarding adhesive inlays and onlays with proximal margins located in dentine. In a prospective, controlled clinical study, the performance of IPS Empress inlays and onlays with cuspal replacements and margins below the amelocemental junction was examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six IPS Empress fillings were placed in 34 patients by six clinicians. The restorations were luted with four different composite systems. The dentin bonding system Syntac Classic was used in addition to the acid-etch-technique. At baseline and after 6 months, one, two and four years after placement the restorations were assessed by two calibrated investigators using modified USPHS codes and criteria. A representative sample of the restorations was investigated by scanning electron microscopy to evaluate wear. RESULTS: Seven of the 96 restorations investigated had to be replaced (failure rate 7%; Kaplan-Meier). Four inlays had suffered cohesive bulk fractures and three teeth required endodontic treatment. After four years in clinical service, significant deterioration (Friedman 2-way Anova; p < 0.05) was found to have occurred in the marginal adaptation of the remaining restorations. Seventy-nine percent of the surviving restorations exhibited marginal deficiencies, independent of the luting composite. Neither the absence of enamel margins, nor cuspal replacement significantly affected the adhesion or marginal quality of the restorations. CONCLUSION: After four years, extensive IPS Empress inlays and onlays bonded with the dentin bonding system Syntac Classic were found to have a 7% failure rate with 79% of the remaining restorations having marginal deficiencies.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Aesthetic inlays: composite or ceramic?

As the aesthetic aspect of dental care becomes increasingly important to patients, the dental practitioner should be aware of the applications and limitations of the various tooth-coloured restorative systems available for the restoration of posterior teeth. Among currently available systems are direct placement resin composites, which may find application in small to medium preparations, and composite or ceramic inlays, which may have wider applications. Similar principles of inlay cavity preparation and restoration placement may be applied to both composite or ceramic systems, with both having the advantage over directly placed composite materials of improved control over anatomic form. Ceramic inlays may provide a high level of wear resistance, but are less simple to construct or repair than composite inlays. While initial clinical trials of composite and ceramic inlays show promise, long-term trials are now required to more fully assess the longevity of these restorations in clinical use.

Bicuspid↗