SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Levodopa”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson's disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa.

BACKGROUND: There is debate about whether the initial treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease should be levodopa or a dopamine agonist. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the safety and efficacy of the dopamine D2-receptor agonist ropinirole with that of levodopa over a period of five years in 268 patients with early Parkinson's disease. If symptoms were not adequately controlled by the assigned study medication, patients could receive supplementary levodopa, administered in an open-label fashion. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of dyskinesia. RESULTS: Eighty-five of the 179 patients in the ropinirole group (47 percent) and 45 of the 89 patients in the levodopa group (51 percent) completed all five years of the study. In the ropinirole group 29 of the 85 patients (34 percent) received no levodopa supplementation. The analysis of the time to dyskinesia showed a significant difference in favor of ropinirole (hazard ratio for remaining free of dyskinesia, 2.82; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.78 to 4.44; P<0.001). At five years, the cumulative incidence of dyskinesia (excluding the three patients who had dyskinesia at base line), regardless of levodopa supplementation, was 20 percent (36 of 177 patients) in the ropinirole group and 45 percent (40 of 88 patients) in the levodopa group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the mean change in scores for activities of daily living among those who completed the study. Adverse events led to the early withdrawal from the study of 48 of 179 patients in the ropinirole group (27 percent) and 29 of 89 patients in the levodopa group (33 percent). The mean (+/-SD) daily doses given by the end of the study were 16.5+/-6.6 mg of ropinirole (plus 427+/-221 mg of levodopa in patients who received supplementation) and 753+/-398 mg of levodopa (including supplements). CONCLUSIONS: Early Parkinson's disease can be managed successfully for up to five years with a reduced risk of dyskinesia by initiating treatment with ropinirole alone and supplementing it with levodopa if necessary.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Levodopa and the progression of Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite the known benefit of levodopa in reducing the symptoms of Parkinson's disease, concern has been expressed that its use might hasten neurodegeneration. This study assessed the effect of levodopa on the rate of progression of Parkinson's disease. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated 361 patients with early Parkinson's disease who were assigned to receive carbidopa-levodopa at a daily dose of 37.5 and 150 mg, 75 and 300 mg, or 150 and 600 mg, respectively, or a matching placebo for a period of 40 weeks, and then to undergo withdrawal of treatment for 2 weeks. The primary outcome was a change in scores on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) between baseline and 42 weeks. Neuroimaging studies of 142 subjects were performed at baseline and at week 40 to assess striatal dopamine-transporter density with the use of iodine-123-labeled 2-beta-carboxymethoxy-3-beta-(4-iodophenyl)tropane ([123I]beta-CIT) uptake. RESULTS: The severity of parkinsonism increased more in the placebo group than in all the groups receiving levodopa: the mean difference between the total score on the UPDRS at baseline and at 42 weeks was 7.8 units in the placebo group, 1.9 units in the group receiving levodopa at a dose of 150 mg daily, 1.9 in those receiving 300 mg daily, and -1.4 in those receiving 600 mg daily (P<0.001). In contrast, in a substudy of 116 patients the mean percent decline in the [123I]beta-CIT uptake was significantly greater with levodopa than placebo (-6 percent among those receiving levodopa at 150 mg daily, -4 percent in those receiving it at 300 mg daily, and -7.2 percent among those receiving it at 600 mg daily, as compared with -1.4 percent among those receiving placebo; 19 patients with no dopaminergic deficits on the baseline scans were excluded from the analysis) (P=0.036). The subjects receiving the highest dose of levodopa had significantly more dyskinesia, hypertonia, infection, headache, and nausea than those receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical data suggest that levodopa either slows the progression of Parkinson's disease or has a prolonged effect on the symptoms of the disease. In contrast, the neuroimaging data suggest either that levodopa accelerates the loss of nigrostriatal dopamine nerve terminals or that its pharmacologic effects modify the dopamine transporter. The potential long-term effects of levodopa on Parkinson's disease remain uncertain.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

[11C]DTBZ-PET correlates of levodopa responses in asymmetric Parkinson's disease.

Levodopa effectively improves motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. However, the beneficial effects of levodopa often erode over time with the emergence of response fluctuations. Although these response changes have been recognized from the early levodopa era, their mechanisms remain poorly understood. We investigated the role of dopamine (DA) terminal loss in the development of motor fluctuations by employing PET with [11C](+/-)dihydrotetrabenazine ([11C]DTBZ) as an in vivo marker for DA nerve terminals. Levodopa response was characterized by analysing the time-response curve to a single dose of levodopa with a finger-tapping test. PET scans were performed in 11 patients with asymmetric Parkinson's disease (age: 61.12 +/- 7.97 years; duration of Parkinson's disease: 10.55 +/- 4.53 years; mean +/- SD). Each patient performed finger-tapping tests for up to 5 h after taking a therapeutic dose of levodopa. Results showed significantly lower [11C]DTBZ binding potential (BP; Bmax/Kd) and baseline tapping rates on the more affected putamen and corresponding body side, respectively, than on the other (P = 0.003 for the former, P = 0.013 for the latter). Among the variables describing the time-response curve, the duration and early decay time were significantly shorter on the more affected side (P = 0.051 and P = 0.021, respectively). Latency to the onset and latency to 50% Emax (the magnitude of the levodopa response) were significantly longer on the more-affected side (P = 0.013 and P = 0.004, respectively). Emax was not significantly different between the two sides. The asymmetry (difference from the more affected to less affected side) of [11C]DTBZ BP in the putamen showed a highly significant correlation with the corresponding asymmetry of the estimated EC50 (levodopa concentration producing 50% of the maximal response; P = 0.022; r = -0.727), a marginally significant correlation with that of latency to the onset (P = 0.065; r = -0.583) and no significant correlation with that of the magnitude, duration or early decay time. This pattern of changes in levodopa response from the less affected to more affected side was similar to that from stable to fluctuating responders except for the latency to onset. These findings suggest a pathogenetic role for DA terminal loss in the development of motor fluctuations. However, the absence of a significant correlation between the early decay of levodopa response and DA terminal density suggests that DA terminal loss alone cannot account for the development of motor fluctuations. Therefore, our study suggests that both levodopa treatment and DA terminal loss contribute to the pathogenesis of motor fluctuations.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Catechol-O-methyltransferase decreases levodopa toxicity in vitro.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 3-O-methylation by catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) on the toxicity of levodopa in neuronal cultures. High concentrations of levodopa are toxic in vitro. Therefore, there is concern that long-term treatment with levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease might accelerate the rate of degeneration of nigrostriatal neurons. However, recent studies have suggested that, while levodopa is harmful in vitro, it may not be toxic in vivo. A possible defense mechanism is by means of metabolic shunting of levodopa excess to 3-O-methyldopa by COMT in peripheral and central nervous system tissues. In this study we examine whether the use of COMT inhibitor, which reduced the levels of 3-O-methyldopa, affect levodopa toxicity. Mice cerebellar granule neurons, PC12, and neuroblastoma cells were used, and their viability following exposure to levodopa and COMT with and without tolcapone, a COMT inhibitor, was measured by neutral red staining. Auto-oxidation of levodopa was evaluated using a spectrophotometer (690 nm). We found that 3-O-methyldopa, unlike levodopa, was not toxic to all cells examined. Addition of purified COMT to levodopa prevented its auto-oxidation and markedly attenuated its cytotoxicity in vitro. Additional tolcapone reversed the protective effect of COMT. The agent 3-O-methyldopa is not toxic to cell cultures. Catechol-O-methyltransferase attenuates toxicity of levodopa in vitro by its metabolism to nontoxic 3-O-methyldopa.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Influence of fluctuations of plasma large neutral amino acids with normal diets on the clinical response to levodopa.

Plasma large neutral amino acids (LNAAs) compete with levodopa for entry into the brain. Fluctuations in plasma LNAA concentrations could therefore contribute to variability in clinical response to levodopa. The hourly plasma levodopa, plasma LNAAs and clinical response were investigated in 11 fluctuating Parkinsonian patients on a regular hospital diet. The fluctuations in plasma levodopa were 2 to 3 times greater than the fluctuations of plasma LNAAs. The correlation between clinical response and plasma levodopa was substantially improved in only one patient by considering plasma LNAAs and calculating relative levodopa flux into brain. Although plasma LNAAs significantly increased during the day, the patients' clinical status did not uniformly deteriorate and mean afternoon clinical scores correlated better with mean plasma levodopa and levodopa flux than with mean plasma LNAAs. Minimum effective concentrations of levodopa for clinical response did not correlate with 9 am LNAA concentrations. It is concluded that in most patients, the relatively small variation in plasma LNAAs in comparison with the large variations in plasma levodopa indicates that fluctuations in LNAA are not an important contributor to the fluctuating response to levodopa.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Motor response to acute dopaminergic challenge with apomorphine and levodopa in Parkinson's disease: implications for the pathogenesis of the on-off phenomenon.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the contribution of postsynaptic changes to motor fluctuations, three groups of parkinsonian patients with differing responses to treatment were acutely challenged with two dopaminergic drugs-apomorphine and levodopa-having different mechanisms of action. METHODS: Forty two patients with Parkinson's disease (14 untreated, eight with a stable response to levodopa, and 20 with levodopa induced motor fluctuations) were challenged on two consecutive days with apomorphine and levodopa. The latency, duration, and magnitude of motor response was measured. RESULTS: A progressive shortening of mean latency after levodopa challenge was found passing from the untreated to the stable and fluctuating groups; the difference between untreated and fluctuating patients was statistically significant (P < 0.01). Response duration after levodopa challenge was similar in untreated and stable patients, whereas it showed a significant shortening in patients with motor fluctuations (P < 0.05 v both untreated and stable patients). When subcutaneous apomorphine was given, untreated patients had a longer response duration than those who had developed motor fluctuations (P < 0.05). Although baseline disability was significantly greater in the fluctuating patients than in the untreated and stable patients, the severity of residual parkinsonian signs after both apomorphine and levodopa challenge was similar for all three groups; as a result, the degree of improvement in parkinsonian signs after dopaminergic stimulation was substantially greater in more advanced than in early cases. Linear regression analysis also indicated that latency and duration after apomorphine challenge did not significantly correlate with those after levodopa challenge, whereas magnitude of response to apomorphine showed a strong positive correlation with that after levodopa challenge (r = 0.9, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The progressive shortening of motor response after both apomorphine and levodopa suggests that pharmacodynamic factors play an important part in determining the duration of motor response and argue against altered central pharmacokinetics of levodopa being principally responsible for the on-off effect. The widening response amplitude and increasing off phase disability occurring during disease progression are also critical factors in determining the appearance of motor fluctuations.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Systematic review of acute levodopa and apomorphine challenge tests in the diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of studies examining the diagnostic accuracy of acute challenge tests with levodopa and/or apomorphine in parkinsonian syndromes to assess their value in the diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. METHODS: A literature search including Medline and the Cochrane Library was performed for studies published in any language comparing acute levodopa and/or apomorphine response with chronic levodopa therapy in parkinsonian syndromes. Abstracted sensitivity and specificity data were summarised using variance weighting and conditional logistic regression for studies comparing two challenge tests. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were located: four examining de novo patients and nine examining patients with well established idiopathic Parkinson's disease and non-parkinsonian conditions. Despite the significant heterogeneity in the methodologies employed, the comparable results suggest that this had little effect on the accuracy of the tests. The sensitivity for the diagnosis of established idiopathic Parkinson's disease was: apomorphine 0.86 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.78-0.94), acute levodopa 0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.85), and chronic levodopa therapy 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.99). The specificity for the diagnosis of established idiopathic Parkinson's disease was: apomorphine 0.85 (95% CI 0.74-0.96), acute levodopa 0.87 (95% CI 0. 77-0.97), and chronic levodopa therapy 0.77 (95% CI 0.61-0.93). The number of patients positive for each test divided by the number with clinically diagnosed de novo disease was: apomorphine 0.63 (95% CI 0. 56-0.70), acute levodopa 0.69 (95% CI 0.59-0.80), and chronic levodopa therapy 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the acute levodopa and apomorphine challenge tests is similar to, but not superior than, that of chronic levodopa therapy in the diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease. As most patients will be given chronic dopamimetic therapy, these tests add nothing while causing significant adverse events and additional cost.

Apomorphine↗

PubMed1979

Levodopa with benserazide or carbidopa in Parkinson disease.

Plasma levodopa and therapeutic responses to treatment with levodopa in combination with benserazide or carbidopa were studied in 49 patients with Parkinson disease not previously treated with levodopa in a blind randomized crossover trial. The treatment periods were 12 weeks; similar dosage schedules were used, with doses that induced equal levels of plasma levodopa in both combinations. In pretrial studies of plasma levodopa responses, 200 mg of levodopa and 50 mg of benserazide was equal to 250 mg of levodopa combined with 25 mg of carbidopa. Equal plasma levodopa responses to both combinations were also found during the trial. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in beneficial effects on parkinsonian disability and individual symptoms or in the frequency of involuntary movements. However, nausea and vomiting occurred significantly more often during treatment with levodopa and carbidopa than during treatment with levodopa and benserazide. This difference was probably due to inadequate inhibition of peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor by the 1:10 ratio of carbidopa to levodopa.

Benserazide↗

PubMed1997

Cabergoline in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: results of the first year of treatment in a double-blind comparison of cabergoline and levodopa. The PKDS009 Collaborative Study Group.

Cabergoline is a potent D2 receptor agonist with a half-life of 65 hours that may provide continuous dopaminergic stimulation administered once daily. In this study, we randomized de novo Parkinson's disease (PD) patients to treatment with increasing doses of cabergoline (0.25 to 4 mg/d) or levodopa (100 to 600 mg/d) up to the optimal or maximum tolerated dose. Decreases of > 30% in motor disability (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Factor III) versus baseline were considered indicative of clinical improvement. If 30% improvement was not achieved, levodopa/ carbidopa could be added on an open basis. Of the 208 patients entered in the cabergoline group, 175 remained in the study for 1 year at a mean dose of 2.8 mg/d; in the levodopa group, 176 of the 205 patients entered were still on study after 1 year at a mean dose of 468 mg/d. The proportion of patients requiring additional levodopa/carbidopa increased in the cabergoline group from 18% at 6 months to 38% at 1 year versus 10% (p = 0.05) at 6 months and 18% (p < 0.01) at 1 year in the levodopa group. The proportion of patients showing clinical improvement did not differ significantly between the two groups, or between the subgroups on monotherapy, at any endpoint. Irrespective of levodopa/carbidopa addition, 81% of patients in the cabergoline group and 87% of patients in the levodopa group were clinically improved at 1 year (p = 0.189); the corresponding figures for the subgroup on monotherapy were 79% in the cabergoline-treated patients and 86% in the levodopa-treated patients (p = 0.199). The mean difference versus baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Factor III scores in patients who remained on monotherapy up to 1 year was 12.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.8, 14.3) in the cabergoline group and 16.4 (95% CI: 14.8, 18.0) in the levodopa group. Adverse events occurred in 76% of patients on cabergoline and in 66% of patients on levodopa. The severity profile for reported events was similar for the two agents. The results of this study indicate that cabergoline treatment for up to 1 year is only marginally less effective than levodopa in the proportion of patients who can be treated in monotherapy. More than 60% of de novo PD patients could be managed on cabergoline alone up to 1 year. In the patients in whom levodopa/carbidopa was needed, the combination therapy provided efficacy similar to that obtained with levodopa alone, with a relevant sparing of levodopa.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

Levodopa improves motor function without impairing cognition in mild non-demented Parkinson's disease patients. Parkinson Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the effects of short-term levodopa administration on motor, cognitive, and psychiatric aspects of Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND: The effects of levodopa on mental processes in PD are controversial. Opinions range from the claim that levodopa improves cognition to the opposite view that levodopa causes or exacerbates dementia, delusions, and hallucinations. Of the 800 idiopathic PD patients enrolled in the original DATATOP study, 387 reached the end point of functional disabilities sufficiently severe to require levodopa treatment. There were 263 men and 124 women who were comparable with regard to age, symptom duration of PD, and measures of PD severity. We compared test scores on motor performance, cognitive function, and psychiatric status before levodopa and again within 6 months after initiation of levodopa therapy. RESULTS: Levodopa administration improved all motor functions significantly. The improvement was significantly greater in women than in men. Levodopa administration did not worsen scores on any cognitive tests, and there were quantitatively small but significant improvements in tests of frontal lobe function. Levodopa exerted only minor effects on psychiatric measures. There were small but significant decreases in scores for depression, and increases in vivid dreams and hallucinations. CONCLUSIONS: Levodopa administration for up to 6 months in dosages sufficient to improve motor function has only small effects on cognitive function and psychiatric status in mild to moderate PD patients. We conclude that motor symptoms in early PD, which result from dopamine depletion, are dissociable from cognitive functions and psychiatric status, which may be more dependent on nondopaminergic mechanisms.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Metabolic correlates of levodopa response in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of levodopa on resting-state brain metabolism in PD. BACKGROUND: In previous studies the authors used [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and PET to quantify regional metabolic abnormalities in PD. They found that this disease is characterized reproducibly by a specific abnormal PD-related pattern (PDRP). In this study the authors used IV levodopa infusion to quantify the effects of dopamine replacement on regional metabolism and PDRP network activity. They tested the hypothesis that clinical response to dopaminergic therapy correlates with these metabolic changes. METHODS: The authors used FDG/PET to measure resting-state regional brain metabolism in seven patients with PD (age, 59.4 +/- 4.2 years; Hoehn and Yahr stage, 1.9 +/- 0.7, mean +/- SD); subjects were scanned both off levodopa and during an individually titrated constant-rate IV levodopa infusion. The authors used statistical parametric mapping to identify significant changes in regional brain metabolism that occurred with this intervention. They also quantified levodopa-induced changes in PDRP expression. Metabolic changes with levodopa correlated with clinical improvement as measured by changes in Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores. RESULTS: Levodopa infusion improved UPDRS motor ratings (30.6% +/- 12.0%, p < 0.002) and significantly decreased regional glucose metabolism in the left putamen, right thalamus, bilateral cerebellum, and left primary motor cortex (p < 0.001). Changes in pallidal metabolism correlated significantly with clinical improvement in UPDRS motor ratings (p < 0.01). Levodopa infusion also resulted in a significant (p = 0.01) decline in PDRP expression. The changes in PDRP activity mediated by levodopa correlated significantly with clinical improvement in UPDRS motor ratings (r = -0.78, p < 0.04). CONCLUSION: Levodopa reduces brain metabolism in the putamen, thalamus, and cerebellum in patients with PD. Additionally, levodopa reduces PD-related pattern activity, and the degree of network suppression correlates with clinical improvement. The response to dopaminergic therapy in Patients with PD may be determined by the modulation of cortico-striato-pallido-thalamocortical pathways.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Does levodopa accelerate Parkinson's disease?

Therapeutic options for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) have expanded tremendously over the last 5 years, although levodopa remains the gold standard of therapy. A major therapeutic controversy has been the question of levodopa's potential to cause toxic effects on nigrostriatal cells, thus potentiating the progression of the disease. The answer to that question will guide physicians in the timing of levodopa initiation and its dosage. The issue of levodopa toxicity was initially raised because of its potential to cause long term adverse effects (dyskinesias and motor fluctuations), which are not observed in untreated patients. Levodopa-induced toxicity can be related to its potential to produce free radicals, which are known to be toxic to cells, in the process of its conversion to dopamine. In vitro data reveals some evidence of the toxic effect of levodopa although recent studies suggest that levodopa toxicity is dependent on its concentration and can be ameliorated in the presence of glial cells. In vivo data from healthy animals and humans does not convincingly demonstrate levodopa toxicity. There is no evidence of levodopa-induced neurotoxicity in patients with PD. Despite the absence of toxic effect in patients with PD, levodopa can cause long term complications like motor fluctuations and dyskinesias and should be used judiciously in the minimal clinically effective dose. In this article we review evidence for and against levodopa neurotoxicity and the implications of the 'levo-dopa controversy' on clinical practice.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The impact of remacemide hydrochloride on levodopa concentrations in Parkinson's disease. Parkinson Study Group.

This study was designed to determine whether remacemide hydrochloride, a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate-type glutamate receptor channel blocker, has a significant impact on serum levodopa concentrations that could complicate the interpretation of future clinical trial results. We performed a multicenter, open-label study of remacemide in 18 patients with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease (PD) who were taking stable dosages of levodopa. Levodopa pharmacokinetics were determined after administration of the patients' usual morning levodopa dose. Patients then took remacemide 300 mg twice a day for 2 weeks, with levodopa pharmacokinetics determined again at an identical testing session, except that remacemide 300 mg was administered one hour before levodopa. Clinical responses were also measured using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). With remacemide treatment, the area-under-the-curve for levodopa did not change. The mean peak plasma levodopa concentration (Cmax) was reduced by 16% compared to baseline, and the mean time to achieve peak plasma levodopa concentration (Tmax) was delayed by 20%. Although remacemide delayed levodopa absorption, the magnitude of the interaction suggests that is unlikely to be an important factor in planning and interpreting future trials of remacemide in levodopa-treated patients with PD.

Acetamides↗

PubMed2006

Levodopa induced motor complications in Thai Parkinson's disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Long-term levodopa usage in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients is known to cause several motor complications. It may be related to several factors such as levodopa dosage, duration of treatment and severity of disease. OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of levodopa motor complications and associated factors in Thai Parkinson's disease patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The authors prospectively collected baseline characteristics of PD patients, details of treatment and complications from 3 hospitals in various parts of Thailand. These patients were diagnosed by UK PD Brain Bank criteria. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients aged 68.1 +/- 9.5 years were recruited. Age of onset was 61.2 +/- 9.8 years. Most patients were in Hoehn-Yahr stage 1-3. The common clinical features were bradykinesia, rigidity and resting tremor Treatments were levodopa (98.1 per cent), anticholinergic (29.9 per cent), dopamine agonists (26 per cent) and COMT inhibitor (9.1 per cent). Eighty-five per cent of the patients had excellent response to levodopa. However, 25 per cent of patients developed motor complications, which were wearing off (79 per cent), on-off fluctuation (45 per cent), freezing (42 per cent), morning dyskinesia (10.5 per cent) and permanent dyskinesia (23.7 per cent). Twelve patients developed severe levodopa induced chorea. Factors associated with levodopa side effects were earlier age of onset, long duration of disease, advanced stage, higher levodopa dosage and long duration of levodopa treatment. In the present study, age of onset was inversely correlated with H-Y stage, while dosage of levodopa was positively correlated with H-Y stage but inversely correlated with lower ADL score, which may be due to advanced disease state. CONCLUSION: Levodopa motor complications are common in Thai PD patients. Wearing off on-off fluctuation and freezing are common forms of motor complications.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Pramipexole vs levodopa as initial treatment for Parkinson disease: a 4-year randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The best way to initiate dopaminergic therapy for early Parkinson disease remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare initial treatment with pramipexole vs levodopa in early Parkinson disease, followed by levodopa supplementation, with respect to the development of dopaminergic motor complications, other adverse events, and functional and quality-of-life outcomes. DESIGN: Multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Academic movement disorders clinics at 22 sites in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Patients with early Parkinson disease (N = 301) who required dopaminergic therapy to treat emerging disability, enrolled between October 1996 and August 1997 and observed until August 2001. INTERVENTION: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive 0.5 mg of pramipexole 3 times per day with levodopa placebo (n = 151) or 25/100 mg of carbidopa/levodopa 3 times per day with pramipexole placebo (n = 150). Dosage was escalated during the first 10 weeks for patients with ongoing disability. Thereafter, investigators were permitted to add open-label levodopa or other antiparkinsonian medications to treat ongoing or emerging disability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to the first occurrence of dopaminergic complications: wearing off, dyskinesias, on-off fluctuations, and freezing; changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and quality-of-life scales; and adverse events. RESULTS: Initial pramipexole treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of developing dyskinesias (24.5% vs 54%; hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.56; P<.001) and wearing off (47% vs 62.7%; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49-0.63; P =.02). Initial levodopa treatment resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of freezing (25.3% vs 37.1%; hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.11-2.59; P =.01). By 48 months, the occurrence of disabling dyskinesias was uncommon and did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The mean improvement in the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score from baseline to 48 months was greater in the levodopa group than in the pramipexole group (2 +/- 15.4 points vs -3.2 +/- 17.3 points, P =.003). Somnolence (36% vs 21%, P =.005) and edema (42% vs 15%, P<.001) were more common in pramipexole-treated subjects than in levodopa-treated subjects. Mean changes in quality-of-life scores did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Initial treatment with pramipexole resulted in lower incidences of dyskinesias and wearing off compared with initial treatment with levodopa. Initial treatment with levodopa resulted in lower incidences of freezing, somnolence, and edema and provided for better symptomatic control, as measured by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, compared with initial treatment with pramipexole. Both options resulted in similar quality of life. Levodopa and pramipexole both appear to be reasonable options as initial dopaminergic therapy for Parkinson disease, but they are associated with different efficacy and adverse-effect profiles.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Neural mechanisms underlying peak-dose dyskinesia induced by levodopa and apomorphine are distinct: evidence from the effects of the alpha(2) adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan.

Dyskinesia, secondary to dopamine replacement therapy, is the major complication of currently available therapies for Parkinson's disease. Alpha(2) adrenoceptor antagonists, such as idazoxan, can significantly reduce levodopa-induced dyskinesia in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-lesioned, nonhuman primate model of Parkinson's disease and in human. This action of adrenoceptor antagonists may involve blockade of the actions of noradrenaline synthesised from levodopa. We hypothesise that, because dopamine receptor agonists, such as apomorphine, cannot be metabolised to produce noradrenaline, activation of adrenoceptors may not be involved in dyskinesia produced by such agents. If this were the case, idazoxan would not be expected to reduce apomorphine-induced dyskinesia. MPTP-lesioned marmosets with stable dyskinesia induced by prolonged levodopa therapy were given an acute challenge with apomorphine (0.3 mg/kg subcutaneously) or levodopa (8.0 mg/kg orally), these doses produced equivalent peak-dose dyskinesia. Idazoxan (2.5 mg/kg p.o.), or vehicle, was then administered with either apomorphine or levodopa. Idazoxan abolished levodopa-induced dyskinesia but did not affect apomorphine-induced dyskinesia (P < 0.05 and P > 0.05, respectively, Wilcoxon matched pairs test). Idazoxan also extended the anti-parkinsonian actions of levodopa but did not affect those of apomorphine. The pharmacological characteristics of the neural mechanisms underlying levodopa-induced dyskinesia and apomorphine-induced dyskinesia in parkinsonism thus appear to be distinct, at least with respect to the involvement of alpha(2) adrenoceptors. Specifically, levodopa, but not apomorphine-induced dyskinesia, involves activation of adrenoceptors. This finding may have major implications for understanding dyskinesia and should be borne in mind when designing clinical studies in which levodopa or dopamine receptor agonist challenges are employed to assess potential anti-dyskinetic properties of drugs.

1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine↗

PubMed1988

Pharmacokinetic studies with sustained-release formulations of levodopa in healthy volunteers.

On the basis of the results of a large number of studies of the correlation between plasma levodopa levels and the occurrence of mobility disorders, it was concluded that side-effects such as dyskinesia, end-of-dose, peak-dose and on-off phenomena, which occur especially during levodopa long-term treatment of Parkinson patients, may be caused by fluctuations in the plasma levodopa levels. Some preliminary trials using sustained-release formulations were not up to expectations. Still, we studied the question of whether it might not be possible after all to obtain sustained plasma levodopa levels over prolonged periods of time with levodopa sustained-release (S. R.) formulations, without causing a high initial peak. For this purpose, we compared the pharmacokinetics of six different levodopa S. R. formulations with a standard preparation in two randomized cross-over trials in healthy male volunteers. Although the levodopa S. R. formulations prolonged the time to peak blood levels in all cases, a plateau that was constant over a longer period of time could not be obtained. However, none of the S. R. preparations studied gave rise to a high initial peak of the plasma levodopa concentration. The levodopa concentrations had again returned to endogenous levels within no more than 8 hours of administration of all six levodopa S. R. formulations.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

In vivo pharmacokinetics of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa in muscle. A microdialysis study.

In the present study in vivo microdialysis sampling coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection, was used to study the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa in skeletal muscle in dog, after intravenous administration of levodopa. For comparison, the pharmacokinetic parameters of both compounds were simultaneously determined in plasma using blood collection. Muscle microdialysis samples and blood were continuously collected for 4 h after the administration of levodopa (25 mg/kg). Pharmacokinetic profiles of levodopa in plasma and muscle were different. The mean Tmax value of levodopa in plasma and muscle was 0.16 h and 1.0 h, respectively. The AUC0----inf for levodopa in plasma was nearly 18-fold higher in plasma than in muscle. The 3-O-methyldopa concentration increased very rapidly after the administration of levodopa, to reach a plateau after 2.5 h and 3 h in plasma and muscle, respectively. The AUC0----4 for 3-O-methyldopa was 3.6-fold higher in plasma than in muscle. The ratio levodopa/3-O-methyldopa, reflecting the metabolic rate of levodopa, was 3.5 times higher in plasma than in muscle, at the peak value of levodopa, and then rapidly declined to values lower than 1, one hour after administration of the drug. We compared our results with literature data from postmortem studies done in rat experiments. We concluded that levodopa is not accumulating in muscle as such, but is converted to 3-O-methyldopa probably before leaving the plasma compartment.

Animals↗