PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Liver Function Tests”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Evaluating asymptomatic patients with abnormal liver function test results.

Asymptomatic patients with abnormal results on liver function test pose a diagnostic challenge. In general, determinations of routinely ordered tests of liver function are neither sensitive nor specific for liver disease. Fatty liver, alcohol-related liver damage and chronic viral hepatitis are the most common causes of abnormal liver function test results in asymptomatic patients. Causes of asymptomatic liver disease include hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, drug toxicity, chronic autoimmune hepatitis, biliary cirrhosis, sclerosing cholangitis, alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency and sarcoidosis. The most efficient screening tests for liver damage are alanine transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin. Repeat testing when results are abnormal, and use of ancillary tests, such as creatine phosphokinase or gamma-glutamyl-transferase, may confirm liver damage. Imaging studies help exclude biliary obstruction or neoplasm. Treatable illnesses should be ruled out. Three to six months of observation for progressive symptoms and liver dysfunction may follow. After the period of observation, further laboratory tests, a diagnostic liver biopsy and/or referral to gastroenterologist may be needed.

Aftercare↗
PubMed1998

[Abnormal liver function tests in the primary care setting].

Results of laboratory tests ordered during a primary care encounter may reveal findings of abnormal liver function tests, including elevated liver enzymes, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia or abnormal coagulation tests. The object of this study was to describe the spectrum of these liver function test (LFT) abnormalities in primary care. Results of all laboratory tests ordered during 10 months in an urban primary care clinic were retrospectively reviewed and the medical charts of patients with abnormal LFTs were studied. In 217/1088 (20%) of the tests at least 1 LFT abnormality was found in 156 patients. New diagnoses were made in 104 patients. The main diagnostic groups were: non-alcoholic fatty liver changes, Gilbert's disease, acute infectious hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease and cirrhosis and hepatotoxic drug injury. In 60 patients the physician classified the abnormality as negligible and not associated with significant disease. However, an abnormal test that had been ordered for evaluation of a specific complaint, was indeed likely to represent significant disease (X2 = 29.5, p < 0.001). We conclude that finding abnormalities in liver function tests is common in the primary care clinic but does not often indicate significant liver disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Assessment of lidocaine metabolite formation in comparison with other quantitative liver function tests.

In clinical practice, the seriousness of liver disease is assessed based on the combined information from clinical examination, routine biochemical tests, and liver histology. Recently, the assessment of hepatic lidocaine metabolism has been proposed as a quantitative liver function test offering valuable additional information. To evaluate whether this new liver function test reflects the combined clinical assessment, we prospectively measured lidocaine metabolism in 111 patients with well characterized liver disease. In addition, lidocaine test results were compared with the aminopyrine breath test and the galactose elimination capacity. Lidocaine (1 mg/kg) was injected i.v. and serum concentrations of its main metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide were determined after 15 min. The results varied widely and the means (+/- S.D.) were similar among patients with mild liver disease (46 +/- 23 ng/ml), but significantly (P < 0.05) lower among patients with Child class A cirrhosis (19 +/- 11 ng/ml) or Child class B or C cirrhosis (21 +/- 19 ng/ml). The [13C]aminopyrine breath test, however, gave a better discrimination among patients with increasing severity of liver disease than lidocaine metabolite formation. The galactose elimination capacity finally best separated patients with mild liver disease from those with cirrhosis. The correlations between any two of the different quantitative liver function tests were weak (R2 consistently < 0.2). We conclude that lidocaine metabolite formation, like other quantitative liver function tests that are based on the microsomal metabolism of model compounds, quantitates a very particular enzymatic reaction which may not be representative for the functional reserve of the entire organ.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1980

Antipyrine clearance and its correlation to routine liver function tests in patients with liver disease.

Antipyrine clearance was determined in five healthy volunteers, 10 patients with viral hepatitis and 15 patients with cirrhosis of the liver. The antipyrine clearance in controls was 30.1 +/- 2.5 ml/kg/h (S.E.M.), in patients with viral hepatitis 30.3 +/- 3.9 ml/kg/h and in liver cirrhosis 20.4 +/- 2.7 ml/kg/h. In the patients with liver disease no correlation could be demonstrated between the routine liver function tests and antipyrine clearance. The results are compared to similar studies reported previously. Antipyrine pharmacokinetics do not appear to be a clinically useful index for the hepatic drug metabolizing capacity in the individual patient with liver disease.

Adult↗