PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “RHODOPSIN”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Interaction between photoactivated rhodopsin and its kinase: stability and kinetics of complex formation.

Rhodopsin phosphorylation is a key event in the deactivation of this G-protein-coupled receptor. Rhodopsin kinase mediates the reaction and requires specific cytoplasmic loop domains on rhodopsin, distinct from the sites of phosphorylation, for binding and activation. In this study, we characterize the formation of a stable complex between photolyzed rhodopsin in native washed disk membranes and its kinase. Centrifugation of the membranes after illumination and subsequent polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis demonstrates light-dependent binding of rhodopsin kinase to the membranes. A real-time monitor for the transition of the solubilized kinase into the bound state is provided by flash-induced light-scattering binding signals. The complex has the following characteristics: (i) the on-rate of the reaction rises in linear proportion to the concentrations of both the kinase and photoactivated rhodopsin; kinetic analysis yields a bimolecular rate constant of kon = 0.5-1 microM-1s-1. (ii) The dissociation constant of the complex is 0.3 < KD < 0.5 microM in the absence of ATP, but with ATP, it decreases by at least a factor of 10; however, phosphorylation of rhodopsin or (auto)phosphorylation of rhodopsin kinase leads to destabilization of the complex. (iii) In contrast to the binding of arrestin and transducin, the binding of rhodopsin kinase to photoactivated rhodopsin does not stabilize the metarhodopsin II photoproduct; however, rhodopsin kinase competes with the G-protein transducin for binding to photoactivated rhodopsin. Extrapolation of the kinetic parameters to cellular concentrations at room temperature suggests that free competitive binding of the kinase would strongly inhibit the G-protein activation process after a few hundred catalytic cycles.

Animals↗

Rhodopsin kinase: substrate specificity and factors that influence activity.

Rhodopsin kinase was prepared from bovine retinas by the method of Sitaramayya [Sitaramayya, A. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 5460] with some minor modifications. The enzyme is able to phosphorylate bovine rhodopsin in the disk membrane, rhodopsin from other species, and rhodopsin solubilized in mild detergent (dodecyl maltoside). Rhodopsin kinase can phosphorylate synthetic peptides containing the appropriate sequences from bovine rhodopsin; however, the Km values for these peptides are about 3 orders of magnitude higher than that for rhodopsin or ATP. Some peptides from the cytosolic surface of rhodopsin inhibit the phosphorylation. These results suggest that more than one region of rhodopsin is involved in the interaction of rhodopsin of the kinase. Mg2+ is required for the Mg-ATP complex as shown by the observation that (ethylenedinitrilo)tetraacetic acid inhibits kinase activity. Second, free Mg2+ above the concentration required to complex all of the ATP present activates the kinase. Third, higher concentrations of Mg2+ yield Mg-ATP-Mg instead of Mg-ATP and therefore inhibit the kinase activity. Other physiologically important cations such as Ca2+, Na+, and K+ reduce the activity of the kinase, probably by forming a metal ion-ATP complex, thereby reducing the concentration of Mg-ATP. 5'-[p-(Fluorosulfonyl)benzoyl]adenosine (FSO2BzAdo), an inhibitor of kinases and ATPases, inhibits rhodopsin kinase according to pseudo-first-order kinetics. The relationship between the first-order constant and the concentration of FSO2BzAdo is hyperbolic. This indicates that a reversible complex between the ATP analogue and the enzyme is formed prior to the covalent attachment of the analogue to rhodopsin kinase.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acetylation↗

Differential spatial and temporal phosphorylation of the visual receptor, rhodopsin, at two primary phosphorylation sites in mice exposed to light.

Phosphorylation of rhodopsin critically controls the visual transduction cascade by uncoupling it from the G-protein transducin. The kinase primarily responsible for this phosphorylation is rhodopsin kinase, a substrate-regulated kinase that phosphorylates light-activated rhodopsin. Protein kinase C has been implicated in controlling the phosphorylation of both light-activated and dark-adapted rhodopsin. Two of the major rhodopsin phosphorylation sites in vivo, Ser(334) and Ser(338), are effective protein kinase C phosphorylation sites in vitro, while the latter is preferentially phosphorylated by rhodopsin kinase in vitro. Using phosphospecific antibodies against each of these two sites, we show that both sites are under differential spatial and temporal regulation. Exposure of mice to light results in rapid phosphorylation of Ser(338) that is evenly distributed along the rod outer segment. Phosphorylation of Ser(334) is considerably slower, begins at the base of the rod outer segment, and spreads to the top of the photoreceptor over time. In addition, we show that phosphorylation of both sites is abolished in rhodopsin kinase(-/-) mice, revealing an absolute requirement for rhodopsin kinase to phosphorylate rhodopsin. This requirement may reflect the need for priming phosphorylations at rhodopsin kinase sites allowing for subsequent phosphorylation by protein kinase C at Ser(334). In this regard, treatment of mouse retinas with phorbol esters results in a 4-fold increase in phosphorylation on Ser(334), with no significant effect on the phosphorylation of Ser(338). Our results are consistent with light triggering rapid priming phosphorylations of rhodopsin by rhodopsin kinase, followed by a slower phosphorylation on Ser(334), which is regulated by protein kinase C.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Phosphorylation of non-bleached rhodopsin in intact retinas and living frogs.

The photoresponse in retinal photoreceptors begins when a molecule of rhodopsin is excited by a photon of light. Photoexcited rhodopsin activates an enzymatic cascade including the G-protein transducin and cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase. As a result, cytoplasmic cyclic GMP concentration is decreased and the photoresponse is initiated. This process is terminated when rhodopsin is phosphorylated by rhodopsin kinase and subsequently blocked by a protein called arrestin. It has been noted by several investigators that light can cause phosphorylation of not only photoexcited but also non-excited rhodopsin in rod photoreceptors. A goal of this study was to determine how much non-bleached rhodopsin is phosphorylated. To determine how the structural integrity of the photoreceptor influences the extent of non-bleached rhodopsin phosphorylation, we studied the reaction in electropermeabilized rod outer segments, in rod outer segments still attached to isolated retinas and in living frogs. In the first two preparations, we found that the maximum extent of non-bleached rhodopsin phosphorylation was approximately 1% of the total rhodopsin pool. In living frogs, the maximal amount of non-bleached rhodopsin phosphorylation was approximately 2% of the total rhodopsin pool and occurred after prolonged illumination by the relatively dim light intensity of 20 lux. These data appear to exclude models for light adaptation that postulate high levels of phosphorylation of non-bleached rhodopsin in rod photoreceptors.

Animals↗

Effect of packing density on rhodopsin stability and function in polyunsaturated membranes.

Rod outer segment disk membranes are densely packed with rhodopsin. The recent notion of raft or microdomain structures in disk membranes suggests that the local density of rhodopsin in disk membranes could be much higher than the average density corresponding to the lipid/protein ratio. Little is known about the effect of high packing density of rhodopsin on the structure and function of rhodopsin and lipid membranes. Here we examined the role of rhodopsin packing density on membrane dynamic properties, membrane acyl chain packing, and the structural stability and function of rhodopsin using a combination of biophysical and biochemical techniques. We reconstituted rhodopsin into large unilamellar vesicles consisting of polyunsaturated 18:0,22:6n3PC, which approximates the polyunsaturated nature of phospholipids in disk membranes, with rhodopsin/lipid ratios ranging from 1:422 to 1:40. Our results showed that increased rhodopsin packing density led to reduced membrane dynamics revealed by the fluorescent probe 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene, increased phospholipid acyl chain packing, and reduced rhodopsin activation, yet it had minimal impact on the structural stability of rhodopsin. These observations imply that densely packed rhodopsin may impede the diffusion and conformational changes of rhodopsin, which could reduce the speed of visual transduction.

Animals↗

Effect of detergents and lipids on transducin photoactivation by rhodopsin.

Rhodopsin samples, isolated using four different extraction procedures, were used to investigate the photodependent activation of the GTPase activity of transducin. A complete inhibition of transducin light-dependent GTP hydrolytic activity was observed when rhodopsin purified in the presence of 1% digitonin, following rod outer segment (ROS) solubilization with 1% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1-propane-sulfonate (CHAPS), was used for its activation [0 pmol of inorganic phosphate (Pi) released/min/pmol of rhodopsin]. Rhodopsin, isolated in the presence of 1% digitonin following ROS solubilization with 1% digitonin, was capable of stimulating slightly transducin GTPase activity, with an initial rate of 1 pmol of GTP hydrolyzed/min/pmol of rhodopsin. However, rhodopsin purified in the presence of 0.2% n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside (DM), following ROS solubilization with either 1% CHAPS or 1% DM, stimulated the enzymatic activity of transducin in a light-dependent manner, with an initial rate of 5 pmol of Pi released/min/pmol of rhodopsin. Addition of 0.075% egg phosphatidylcholine (PC) to the four different solubilized rhodopsin samples significantly enhanced light-stimulated GTP hydrolysis by transducin, with initial rates increasing from 0 to 1, 1 to 2, and 5 to 30 pmol of Pi released/min/pmol of rhodopsin, respectively. Furthermore, DM-solubilized rhodopsin induced the hydrolysis of the maximum amount of GTP by transducin at 0.0075% PC, while digitonin-solubilized rhodopsin only stimulated the GTPase activity of transducin to a similar value, when the amount of the photoreceptor protein was increased 4-fold and 0.15% PC was added to the assay mixture. These results suggest that the effective photoactivation of transducin by rhodopsin requires phospholipids, which seem to be differentially eliminated with the detergent extraction procedure utilized during ROS membranes solubilization and photopigment isolation.

Animals↗

Rhodopsin-mediated blue-light damage to the rat retina: effect of photoreversal of bleaching.

PURPOSE: Acute white-light damage to rods depends on the amount of rhodopsin available for bleaching during light exposure. Bleached rhodopsin is metabolically regenerated through the visual cycle involving the pigment epithelium, or photochemically by deep blue light through photoreversal of bleaching. Because photoreversal is faster than metabolic regeneration of rhodopsin by several orders of magnitude, the photon catch capacity of the retina is significantly augmented during blue-light illumination, which may explain the greater susceptibility of the retina to blue light than to green light. However, blue light can also affect function of several blue-light-absorbing enzymes that may lead to the induction of retinal damage. Therefore, this study was conducted to test whether rhodopsin and its bleaching intermediates play a role in blue-light-induced retinal degeneration. METHODS: Eyes of anesthetized rats and mice that did or did not contain rhodopsin were exposed to green (550 +/- 10 nm) or deep blue (403 +/- 10 nm) light for up to 2 hours. Rats with nearly rhodopsinless retinas were obtained by bleaching rhodopsin in animals with inhibited metabolic rhodopsin regeneration-that is, under halothane anesthesia. In addition, Rpe65(-/-) mice that are completely without rhodopsin were used to test the susceptibility to blue-light damage of a rodent retina completely devoid of the visual pigment. Effects of illumination on photoreceptor morphology were assessed 24 hours or 10 days thereafter by morphologic and biochemical methods. RESULTS: Exposure to blue light resulted in severe retinal damage and activation of the transcription factor AP-1 in rats. In contrast, green light had no effect. When rhodopsin was almost completely bleached by short-term green-light exposure while metabolic regeneration (but not photoreversal) was prevented by halothane anesthesia, blue-light exposure induced distinct lesions in rat retinas. When both metabolic rhodopsin regeneration and photoreversal of bleaching were almost completely inhibited, blue-light exposure caused only very moderate lesions. When mice without rhodopsin were exposed to blue light, no damage occurred, in contrast to wild-type control mice. CONCLUSIONS: Short time exposure to blue light has deleterious effects on retinal morphology. Because damage was observed only in the presence of the visual pigment, blue-light-induced retinal degeneration is rhodopsin mediated. Absorption of blue light by other proteins is not sufficient to induce light damage. Photoreversal of bleaching, which occurs only in blue but not in green light, increases the photon-catch capacity of the retina and may thus account for the difference in the damage potential between blue and green light.

Animals↗

Mutant rhodopsin transgene expression on a null background.

PURPOSE: To study mechanisms leading to photoreceptor degeneration in mouse models for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) based on the rhodopsin P23H mutation. METHODS: Mice of a transgenic line expressing a rhodopsin triple mutant, V20G, P23H, and P27L (GHL), were mated with rhodopsin (rho) knockout mice. Littermates of various ages and genotypes (GHL+rho+/+, GHL+rho+/-, and GHL+rho-/-) were examined for outer nuclear layer thickness and outer segment formation (histology), fate of mutant rhodopsin (immunocytochemistry), and photoreceptor function (electroretinogram; ERG). RESULTS: Mice expressing GHL-rhodopsin in the absence of wild-type rhodopsin had severe retinopathy, which was nearly complete by postnatal day (P)30. GHL-rhodopsin formed homodimers nearly exclusively on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels, whereas wild-type rhodopsin predominantly formed monomers. Expression level of mutant rhodopsin in predegenerate (P10) GHL+rho-/- retinas was low, approximately 10% to 25% of normal levels. No elaboration of disc membrane or outer segment formation was observed at any time point examined. The mutant rhodopsin was found mostly in perinuclear locales (endoplasmic reticulum; ER) as evidenced by colocalization using the antibodies Rho1D4 and calnexin-NT. CONCLUSIONS: GHL-rhodopsin dimerizes, localizes to the ER, and fails to transport and support outer segment formation. Additionally, the mutant protein does not support a scotopic ERG a-wave and accelerates photoreceptor degeneration over that occurring with the rhodopsin knockout alone. These findings indicate a cytotoxic effect of the mutant protein, probably elicited by an unfolded protein response.

Animals↗

Rhodopsin/transducin interactions. I. Characterization of the binding of the transducin-beta gamma subunit complex to rhodopsin using fluorescence spectroscopy.

In this work we have used fluorescence spectroscopic approaches to examine the binding of the beta gamma T subunit complex of transducin to the photoreceptor, rhodopsin. To do this, we have covalently labeled the beta gamma T subunit complex with the environmentally sensitive fluorescent cysteine reagent 2-(4'-maleimidylanilino)naphthalene-6-sulfonic acid (MIANS). By using the MIANS moiety as a fluorescent reporter group, we were able to monitor directly the binding of the MIANS-beta gamma T complex to light-activated rhodopsin, which was reconstituted into phosphatidylcholine vesicles, through an enhancement (30-50%) in the MIANS fluorescence. Phosphatidylcholine vesicles, alone, elicited only minor changes in the MIANS-beta gamma T fluorescence (i.e. less than 10% enhancement), whereas the addition of rhodopsin in the absence of lipid vesicles and in minimal detergent fully mimicked the effects of reconstituted rhodopsin and caused a significant enhancement of the MIANS fluorescence. The interactions between the MIANS-beta gamma T complex and rhodopsin also resulted in a quenching of the rhodopsin tryptophan fluorescence (approximately 30%), which most likely reflected resonance energy transfer between the tryptophan residues and the MIANS moieties. The binding of the MIANS-beta gamma T species to the alpha T subunit was accompanied by an enhancement of the MIANS fluorescence (30-50%) and a slight blue shift of the emission maximum, as described previously (Phillips, W. J., and Cerione, R. A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11017-11024). However, the alpha T-induced enhancement of the MIANS-beta gamma T fluorescence was not additive with the enhancement elicited by rhodopsin. Conditions which resulted in the activation of the alpha T subunit reversed the alpha T-induced enhancement of the MIANS emission, whereas the rhodopsin-induced enhancement persisted, thereby suggesting that the rhodopsin-beta gamma T complex can remain intact throughout the G protein activation event. Studies with synthetic peptides representing different regions of the cytoplasmic domain of rhodopsin demonstrated that a portion of the putative carboxyl-terminal tail (amino acid residues 310-324) was capable of eliciting changes in the MIANS-beta gamma T fluorescence as well as inhibiting the MIANS-beta gamma T-induced quenching of the rhodopsin tryptophan fluorescence. These results suggest that this region of the rhodopsin molecule may constitute a portion of the binding domain for the beta gamma T complex.

Anilino Naphthalenesulfonates↗

Direct binding of visual arrestin to a rhodopsin carboxyl terminal synthetic phosphopeptide.

PURPOSE: The phosphorylated carboxyl terminus of rhodopsin is required for the stable binding of visual arrestin to the full length rhodopsin molecule. Phosphorylation of the carboxyl terminus has been shown to induce conformational changes in arrestin, which promote its binding to the cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin. However, it has not been determined whether phosphorylation is also responsible for the direct binding of the rhodopsin carboxyl terminus to arrestin. To further investigate the role of rhodopsin phosphorylation on arrestin binding, surface plasmon resonance was used to measure the interaction between a synthetic phosphopeptide corresponding to the carboxyl terminus of rhodopsin and visual arrestin in real time. METHODS: Synthetic peptides were generated that correspond to the phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated carboxyl terminus of bovine rhodopsin. These peptides were immobilized on a biosensor chip and their interaction with purified visual arrestin was monitored by surface plasmon resonance on a BIAcore 2000 or 3000. RESULTS: A synthetic peptide phosphorylated on residues corresponding to Ser-338, Thr-340, Thr-342 and Ser-343 of bovine rhodopsin was sufficient for direct binding to visual arrestin. In contrast, a second phosphopeptide phosphorylated on Thr-340 and Thr-342 and a nonphosphorylated synthetic peptide were not able to bind arrestin. A peptide fully substituted at all serine and threonine residues with glutamic acid was unable to substitute for phosphorylation. CONCLUSIONS: Surface plasmon resonance is a sensitive method for detecting small differences in affinity. We were successful in using this technique to detect differences in the affinity of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated rhodopsin peptides for visual arrestin. The data suggest that these are low-affinity interactions and indicate that phosphorylation is responsible for the direct binding of the rhodopsin carboxyl terminus to visual arrestin. Four phosphorylated residues are sufficient for this interaction. Because the affinity of the synthetic phosphopeptide for arrestin is substantially lower than the full length rhodopsin molecule, the cytoplasmic loops and rhodopsin carboxyl terminus appear to interact in a cooperative manner to stably bind arrestin.

Animals↗

Phosphorylation at sites near rhodopsin's carboxyl-terminus regulates light initiated cGMP hydrolysis.

We find prompt, high stoichiometry phosphorylation of rhodopsin in response to low fractional rhodopsin bleaching in bovine rod outer segments (ROS). For example, 4 +/- 1 phosphates are incorporated per bleached rhodopsin (Rho*) in 30 sec and 6 +/- 2 phosphates are incorporated in 75 sec in response to bleaching 1% of the rhodopsin in the presence of 1 mM [gamma-32P]ATP and 0.1 mM nonradioactive GTP. Omission of GTP leads to ca 70% inhibition of rhodopsin phosphorylation, presumably due to the GTP-binding protein blocking access of rhodopsin kinase to rhodopsin. Light induced phosphodiesterase (PDE) activation is rapidly quenched in the presence of ATP as first reported by by Liebman and Pugh [Nature 287, 734-736 (1980)]. The kinetics of rhodopsin phosphorylation vary with conditions and from preparation to preparation, however, they are always at least as fast as the ATP dependent quenching of PDE activation. The maximum extent of rhodopsin phosphorylation was limited by specific proteolytic trimming of the carboxyl-terminal phosphorylation sites in washed ROS membranes "stripped" of extrinsic proteins. Membrane preparations with 6,4,2, or 1 phosphate(s) incorporated/Rho* (after a 75 sec post bleach incubation) were produced by treatment with: no protease, carboxypeptidase Y (C), trypsin (T), or both T and C (TC), respectively, followed by reassociation with extrinsic membrane proteins and phosphorylation. Low fractional bleaching was required for maximum phosphorylation/Rho* in membranes which were stripped and reassociated with extrinsic proteins and in isolated ROS. Removal of C-terminal rhodopsin phosphorylation sites has little or no effect on light activation of PDE in the absence of ATP. However, in the presence of ATP the extent of the removal of C-terminal rhodopsin residues has large effects on the light activation and the shut-off of PDE. The single phosphate/Rho* that was added to TC digested membranes reduced the lifetime of Rho* but apparently was not incorporated rapidly enough under our conditions to inhibit the Vmax of PDE. The two phosphates/Rho* which were incorporated after T digestion cause a large decrease in the lifetime of Rho* as well as a decrease in the Vmax of PDE (at low bleaching levels). The four phosphates/Rho* that were added after C digestion further reduce the lifetime of Rho* and the Vmax of PDE. The 6 phosphates/Rho* which were incorporated into the unproteolyzed membranes have little additional effect on Rho* lifetime compared to 4 phosphates/Rho*. However, increasing the phosphorylation observed from 4 to 6 phosphates greatly inhibits the Vmax of PDE at intermediate bleaching levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

3',5'-Cyclic-GMP Phosphodiesterases↗

Depalmitoylation of rhodopsin with hydroxylamine.

Intrinsic membrane proteins that to date have been investigated with respect to the function of palmitoylation are the beta-adrenergic receptor, rhodopsin, the alpha 2A-adrenergic receptor, and the influenza virus spike glycoprotein. As described above, the studies have led to differing conclusions with respect to the influence of palmitoylation on physiological activity. The basis of the differences remains unclear, but it may relate at least in part to the membrane environment of the protein during these studies, that is, the presence of a native membrane, the membrane composition of the expression cell line (in the case of mutant proteins), or the absence of membrane (in the case of detergent-purified proteins). For example, in the case of rhodopsin, the composition of the ROS disk membrane differs from that of the rod plasma membrane, and presumably also from the plasma membranes of cell lines in which mutant rhodopsins are expressed. Variation in membrane composition is known to have marked effects on the ability of rhodopsin to mediate the photic activation of PDE. Thus, although Karnik et al. clearly demonstrated the absence of an absolute requirement for palmitate in activating transducin, the influence of detergent on tertiary protein structure may have masked the full effect of the elimination of palmitate on the transducin-activating property of rhodopsin. Alternatively, the differing results obtained in the studies of rhodopsin could be a consequence of differences in amino acid sequences of the proteins studied. The precise functional role of the palmitate groups of rhodopsin remains an important question for further research. It was suggested by Ovchinnikov et al. that the hydrolysis of covalently bound palmitate might occur during the process of rhodopsin bleaching, but more recent data argue against this hypothesis. Experiments using synthetic peptides (representing cytoplasmic loop regions of rhodopsin) to identify the sites of interaction of R* and transducin provide support for an alternative possibility, namely, that palmitoylation and the resulting cytoplasmic loop play a role in the coupling of rhodopsin with transducin. The finding that the binding of transducin to R* occurs independently of the presence of palmitate argues against an essential requirement of palmitoylation on the binding step itself. However, available data indicate an enhancement, by depalmitoylation, of light-dependent GTPase activity in ROS preparations, although not in assays of unpalmitoylated, purified mutant rhodopsins (see above).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Acylation↗

Experimental and computational studies of the desensitization process in the bovine rhodopsin-arrestin complex.

The deactivation of the bovine G-protein-coupled receptor, rhodopsin, is a two-step process consisting of the phosphorylation of specific serine and threonine residues in the cytoplasmic tail of rhodopsin by rhodopsin kinase. Subsequent binding of the regulatory protein arrestin follows this phosphorylation. Previous results find that at least three phosphorylatable sites on the rhodopsin tail (T340) and at least two of the S338, S334, or S343 sites are needed for complete arrestin-mediated deactivation. Thus, to elucidate the details of the interaction between rhodopsin with arrestin, we have employed both a computational and an in vitro experimental approach. In this work, we first simulated the interaction of the carboxy tail of rhodopsin with arrestin using a Monte Carlo simulated annealing method. Since at this time phosphorylation of specific serines and threonines is not possible in our simulations, we substitute either aspartic or glutamic acid residues for the negatively charged phosphorylated residues required for binding. A total of 17 simulations were performed and analysis of this shows specific charge-charge interactions of the carboxy tail of rhodopsin with arrestin. We then confirmed these computational results with assays of comparable constructed rhodopsin mutations using our in vitro assay. This dual computational/experimental approach indicates that sites S334, S338, and T340 in rhodopsin and K14 and K15 on arrestin are indeed important in the interaction of rhodopsin with arrestin, with a possible weaker S343 (rhodopsin)/K15 (arrestin) interaction.

Animals↗

Rhodopsin-stimulated activation-deactivation cycle of transducin: kinetics of the intrinsic fluorescence response of the alpha subunit.

The intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of the alpha subunit of transducin (alpha T) has been shown to be sensitive to the binding of guanine nucleotides, with the fluorescence being enhanced by as much as 2-fold upon the binding of GTP or nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues [cf. Phillips and Cerione (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 15498-15505]. In this work, we have used these fluorescence changes to analyze the kinetics for the activation (GTP binding)-deactivation (GTPase) cycle of transducin in a well-defined reconstituted phospholipid vesicle system containing purified rhodopsin and the alpha T and beta gamma T subunits of the retinal GTP-binding protein. Both the rate and the extent of the GTP-induced fluorescence enhancement are dependent on [rhodopsin], while only the rate (and not the extent) of the GTP gamma S-induced enhancement is dependent on the levels of rhodopsin. Comparisons of the fluorescence enhancements elicited by GTP gamma S and GTP indicate that the GTP gamma S-induced enhancements directly reflect the GTP gamma S-binding event while the GTP-induced enhancements represent a composite of the GTP-binding and GTP hydrolysis events. At high [rhodopsin], the rates for GTP binding and GTPase are sufficiently different such that the GTP-induced enhancement essentially reflects GTP binding. A fluorescence decay, which always follows the GTP-induced enhancement, directly reflects the GTP hydrolytic event. The rate of the fluorescence decay matches the rate of [32P]Pi production due to [gamma-32P]GTP hydrolysis, and the decay is immediately reversed by rechallenging with GTP. The GTP-induced fluorescence changes (i.e., the enhancement and ensuing decay) could be fit to a simple model describing the activation-deactivation cycle of transducin. The results of this modeling suggest the following points: (1) the dependency of the activation-deactivation cycle on [rhodopsin] can be described by a simple dose response profile; (2) the rate of the rhodopsin-stimulated activation of multiple alpha T(GDP) molecules is dependent on [rhodopsin] and when [alpha T] greater than [rhodopsin], the activation of the total alpha T pool may be limited by the rate of dissociation of rhodopsin from the activated alpha T(GTP) species; and (3) under conditions of optimal rhodopsin-alpha T coupling (i.e., high [rhodopsin]), the cycle is limited by GTP hydrolysis with the rate of Pi release, or any ensuing conformational change, being at least as fast as the hydrolytic event.

Animals↗

Photoisomerization in rhodopsin.

This article reviews the primary reaction processes in rhodopsin, a photoreceptive pigment for twilight vision. Rhodopsin has an 11-cis retinal as the chromophore, which binds covalently with a lysine residue through a protonated Schiff base linkage. Absorption of a photon by rhodopsin initiates the primary photochemical reaction in the chromophore. Picosecond time-resolved spectroscopy of 11-cis locked rhodopsin analogs revealed that the cis-trans isomerization of the chromophore is the primary reaction in rhodopsin. Then, generation of femtosecond laser pulses in the 1990s made it possible to follow the process of isomerization in real time. Formation of photorhodopsin within 200 fsec was observed by a transient absorption (pump-probe) experiment, which also revealed that the photoisomerization in rhodopsin is a vibrationally coherent process. Femtosecond fluorescence spectroscopy directly captured excited-state dynamics of rhodopsin, so that both coherent reaction process and unreacted excited state were observed. Faster photoreaction of the chromophore in rhodopsin than that in solution implies that the protein environment facilitates the efficient isomerization process. Such contributions of the protein residues have been monitored by infrared spectroscopy of rhodopsin, bathorhodopsin, and isorhodopsin (9-cis rhodopsin) at low temperatures. The crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin recently reported will lead to better understanding of the mechanism in future.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Rhodopsin phosphorylation sites and their role in arrestin binding.

Rhodopsin, the rod cell photoreceptor, undergoes rapid desensitization upon exposure to light, resulting in uncoupling of the receptor from its G protein, transducin (Gt). Phosphorylation of serine and threonine residues located in the COOH terminus of rhodopsin is the first step in this process, followed by the binding of arrestin. In this study, a series of mutants was generated in which these COOH-terminal phosphorylation substrate sites were substituted with alanines. These mutants were expressed in HEK-293 cells and analyzed for their ability to be phosphorylated by rhodopsin kinase and to bind arrestin. The results demonstrate that rhodopsin kinase can efficiently phosphorylate other serine and threonine residues in the absence of the sites reported to be the preferred substrates for rhodopsin kinase. A correlation was observed between the level of rhodopsin phosphorylation and the amount of arrestin binding to these mutants. However, mutants T340A and S343A demonstrated a significant reduction in arrestin binding even though the level of phosphorylation was similar to that of wild-type rhodopsin. Substitution of Thr-340 and Ser-343 with glutamic acid residues (T340E and S343E, respectively) was not sufficient to promote the binding of arrestin in the absence of phosphorylation by rhodopsin kinase. When S343E was phosphorylated, its ability to bind arrestin was similar to that of wild-type rhodopsin. Surprisingly, arrestin binding to phosphorylated T340E did not increase to the level observed for wild-type rhodopsin. These results suggest that 2 amino acids, Thr-340 and Ser-343, play important but distinct roles in promoting the binding of arrestin to rhodopsin.

Alanine↗

Functional interaction between bovine rhodopsin and G protein transducin.

To elucidate the mechanisms of specific coupling of bovine rhodopsin with the G protein transducin (G(t)), we have constructed the bovine rhodopsin mutants whose second or third cytoplasmic loop (loop 2 or 3) was replaced with the corresponding loop of the G(o)-coupled scallop rhodopsin and investigated the difference in the activation abilities for G(t), G(o), and G(i) among these mutants and wild type. We have also prepared the Galpha(i) mutants whose C-terminal 11 or 5 amino acids were replaced with those of Galpha(t), Galpha(o), and Galpha(q) to evaluate the role of the C-terminal tail of the alpha-subunit on the specific coupling of bovine rhodopsin with G(t). Replacement of loop 2 of bovine rhodopsin with that of the scallop rhodopsin caused about a 40% loss of G(t) and G(o) activation, whereas that of loop 3 enhanced the G(o) activation four times with a 60% decrease in the G(t) activation. These results indicated that loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin is one of the regions responsible for the specific coupling with G(t). Loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin discriminates the difference of the 6-amino acid sequence (region A) at a position adjacent to the C-terminal 5 amino acids of the G protein, resulting in the different activation efficiency between G(t) and G(o). In addition, the binding of region A to loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin is essential for activation of G(t) but not G(i), even though the sequence of the region A is almost identical between Galpha(t) and Galpha(i). These results suggest that the binding of loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin to region A in Galpha(t) is one of the mechanisms of specific G(t) activation by bovine rhodopsin.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Transducin activation by molecular species of rhodopsin other than metarhodopsin II.

Decay of metarhodopsin II was accelerated by hydroxylamine treatment or dark incubation of metarhodopsin II at 30 degrees C. The products thus obtained after decay of metarhodopsin II induced GTPase activity on transducin as well as metarhodopsin II suggesting that rhodopsin could activate transducin after the decay of metarhodopsin II intermediate. After urea-treated bovine rod outer segment membrane was completely bleached, rhodopsin in the membrane was regenerated by the addition of 11-cis retinal at various temperatures between 0 and 37 degrees C. The capacity to induce GTPase activity on transducin and phosphate incorporating capacity catalyzed by rhodopsin kinase were measured on such rhodopsins. The results showed that: (1) Regeneration of alpha band of rhodopsin was complete regardless of regeneration temperature; (2) When regenerated at temperatures below 10 degrees C, rhodopsins induced a GTPase activity on transducin in the dark even after treatment with hydroxylamine, whereas rhodopsins after regeneration at temperatures above 13 degrees C did not; (3) When regenerated at 0 degrees C, rhodopsin was phosphorylated if incubated with rhodopsin kinase and ATP in the dark, whereas the spectrally regenerated rhodopsin at 30 degrees C was not. The complete quenching of functions of photoactivated rhodopsin was achieved by recombination with 11-cis retinal at temperatures above 13 degrees C but not below 10 degrees C suggesting the existence of a low temperature intermediate upon regeneration.

Animals↗