Chemotherapy for known residual disease after resection of gastric and colorectal cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Following resection of their tumour, 162 patients with colorectal cancer entered a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial of adjuvant oral razoxane. Thirty-one patients were Duke's group A; 49 group B; 61 group C; and 17 group D; an additional four patients were randomized in error. The adjuvant group received the usual clinical care and 125 mg razoxane twice daily for 5 consecutive days (monday-friday) every week indefinitely. Control patients received the same clinical care as the adjuvant group, but no razoxane. At 3 years, 134 patients (84%) are evaluable. The recurrence rate in the first 6 months was 20% and 28% respectively in the Duke's B and C controls compared with 4% and 9% in the corresponding razoxane treated patients. Most recurrences occurred within the first 6 months from randomization. When all patients as randomized are included in the analysis of survival, irrespective of whether they were cured by surgery (Duke's A), had advanced cancer (Duke's D), or took no razoxane when randomized to take it, then as might be expected any differences there may be between the razoxane-treated and control patients with minimal residual disease (Duke's B and C) are so distorted that the p value of the difference in survival was 0.93. If however only patients with Duke's group B or C are taken (49 controls and 47 treated), log-rank analysis reveals a difference in the cancer mortality curves (p = 0.07). If patients who had been randomized to take razoxane, but who had not taken it at any time (and therefore received the same treatment as controls) are analysed with the controls, the difference between the two groups increases further, with p less than 0.05. The razoxane-treated patients experienced no significant toxicity apart from a readily reversible mild leukopenia in 52% while gastrointestinal symptoms necessitated stopping the drug in only four patients. These four all took the drug for less than 4 weeks. Because there was no toxicity to subtract from any benefit razoxane adjuvant treatment produced and the quality of life was not impaired, the therapeutic benefit of surgery wsa increased to the extent that razoxane increased survival of patients with Duke's B and C tumours.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal and gastric cancer is being actively investigated. Studies of both single antineoplastic agents and combinations of several drugs have been used. In colorectal cancer, single-agent therapy has not resulted in improved survival. Combination chemotherapy studies are at too early a stage to be evaluated. In gastric cancer, single-agent chemotherapy has not been effective as adjunctive treatment to surgery. Combinations of active agents in gastric cancer hold promise as effective surgical adjuvant therapy.
A clone of human gastric cancer cells (AGS-6) and the parental line (AGS-P) from which it was isolated were used in cell survival studies to determine whether pretreatment for 24, 48 or 72h with alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO, 5mM) would increase the cell's sensitivity to 5-Fluorouracil (5FU), Adriamycin (Adria), 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(4-methyl cyclohexyl)-1-nitrosourea (MeCCNU), or Bleomycin (Bleo). Generally, the AGS parental cells were most sensitive to the anticancer agents after exposures to DFMO. However, there was no way to predict in advance from DFMO-induced changes in ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), polyamine or cell kinetics values, how long an exposure to DFMO was required before sensitization to an anticancer agent occurred. The degree of potentiation for a single drug was variable from time to time during exposure to DFMO, and broad differences in the sensitizations were demonstrated among the four anticancer drugs. The AGS-6 clone exhibited little or no increased sensitivity as a result of pretreatment with DFMO, even though the DFMO-induced reductions in ODC and polyamine values in these cells were similar to those produced in the more sensitive parental line.
We have shown in earlier studies that repeated weekly exposures of a human astrocytoma clone (AST 3-4) to MeCCNU (10 micrograms/ml for 1 h per week) produced a linear decrease in survival over the first 3 weekly treatments. But, after that time these cells became progressively more resistant to the 10 micrograms/ml concentration of the agent. In the studies reported here we show that these previously treated cells were also less responsive to other doses ranging from 1 to 30 micrograms MeCCNU/ml. This change in sensitivity to MeCCNU was accompanied by collateral changes in response to other agents: resistance to BCNU and Galactitol, increased sensitivity to Adriamycin, and no change to ionizing radiation. These experiments suggest that once repeated treatments with a single agent cause a tumor cell population to become more resistant, sensitivity to other agents may also change unpredictably.
In this Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) phase II study, dibromodulcitol (DBD) and a combination of actinomycin D, hydroxyurea, and cyclophosphamide (AHC) were compared with methyl-CCNU, the current ECOG standard, in patients who had received no prior chemotherapy for disseminated malignant melanoma. The response rates were 6% (3/50) for AHC, 9% (3/34) for DBD, and 14% (7/49) for methyl-CCNU. Median survival times were 4, 5, and 6 months, respectively. Neither regimen appears to offer any advantage over methyl-CCNU as front-line therapy for patients with disseminated melanoma.
A review is given of the historical and current concepts of adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy of colorectal cancer. Early studies analyzing the use of single drug regimens were followed by a second study generation investigating adjuvant chemotherapeutic combinations. 5-FU proved to be the most efficient single drug investigated and 5-FU/MeCCNU/vincristin the most efficient chemotherapeutic combination, but no significant improvement in 5-year survival rates was achieved. Clear progress was noted with the introduction of levamisol (LEV) for modulation of 5-FU. A 33% improval in the 5-year survival rate in patients with stage III colon carcinoma was documented. It was therefore recommended (NIH consensus conference 1990) that all patients with stage III colon carcinoma be treated with this regimen unless admitted to other trials of adjuvant therapy. Preoperative radiotherapy with a dosage of 35-45 Gy can lead to downstaging of rectal cancer. Nevertheless, significant improvement in patient survival has not been proved convincingly using either isolated pre- or postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. However, combined radiochemotherapy has been shown to improve both patient survival and local tumor control compared to surgical resection alone. It is therefore recommended that all stage II and III rectal cancer patients be treated with adjuvant combined radiochemotherapy. 5-FU/MeCCNU is currently expected to be the most efficient chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy. Early data point out that MeCCNU could possibly be omitted. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) allows further dosage escalation in order to improve local tumor control without affecting radiosensitive structures. Available data are still sparse and mostly based on the treatment of advanced carcinoma. A general validation of IORT is not yet possible, but current data are promising.
Permanent cell lines and clones established from an untreated patient (AGS cells) with gastric carcinoma, and from a similar patient who had been treated with Adriamycin, 5FU and cytoxan (SII cells) were used in a study that compared their drug and radiation survival sensitivities to their glutathidine (GSH) values. The SII parental cell line was more resistant than the AGS cells in vitro to chlorambucil, ACT D, Adria, Bleo, and X-rays. This greater resistance was positively correlated with GSH values that were 1.77 times higher than in the AGS parental cell line. By contrast the SII parental cells were more sensitive than the AGS cells to MeCCNU and Melphalan. The drug and radiation sensitivities expressed among the clones of the two cell lines were heterogeneous and did not correlate with their GSH values.
A new radiopharmaceutical, 99mTc-Methyl-CCNU, was prepared for the static imaging of kidneys and the radiochemical purity was tested by paper and thin-layer chromatography. The biological distribution was studied in 15 mice sacrificed at 10 min. 30 min, 1 h, 3 h, and 6 h after IV injection. Blood clearance and excretion of the agent in urine were followed in three volunteers for a period of 24 h. Renal uptake was high (25% in 6 h), plasma clearance very fast (90% in 1 h), and urinary excretion reached a platueau after 6 h with 25% excretion. A longitudinal slice of a rabbit kidney showed the cortical accumulation on autoradiography and scintigraphy. Clinical studies indicated the usefulness of this radiopharmaceutical as a kidney imaging agent.
The development of nitrosoureas has switched from more lipophilic derivatives to congeners with higher water-solubility, since this property was presumably associated with a decrease in myelosuppression. We have compared the therapeutic efficacy of clinically well-known lipophilic nitrosoureas BCNU, CCNU, and MeCCNU with the recently introduced water-soluble nitrosoureas chlorozotocin (CZT) and hydroxyethyl-CNU (HeCNU), using a human melanoma xenograft system. There were considerable differences in tumor-inhibitory activity, with HeCNU ranking first and CZT last, and the rank order was similar for drug-induced lethality or bone marrow damage (in terms of reduced cellularity or macromolecular DNA damage). When the doses are expressed as percentages of the corresponding LD10/30 values, CZT ranks last and HeCNU low among conventional nitrosoureas. We conclude that water-solubility is not associated with reduced myelosuppression and that other guidelines will have to be adopted for rational development of nitrosoureas.
As determined by a colorimetric assay measuring parent compounds plus ether-extractable nitroso-containing metabolites, N,N'-bis(2-chloroethyl)-N-nitrosourea (BCNU) disappeared more rapidly than N-(2-chloroethyl)-N'cyclohexyl-N-nitrosourea (CCNU) and N-(2-chloroethyl)-N'-(4-transmethylcyclohexyl)-N-nitrosourea (MeCCNU) and their products from the tissues of mice injected IV. Assay of selected samples by high-pressure liquid chromatography revealed that the colorimetric assay for BCNU was specific in that the two assays gave equivalent results. Following IV-injections of CCNU and MeCCNU, however, levels of the parent compounds decreased much more rapidly than the total, color-producing material. Of seven tissues, the largest Cxt values for BCNU, as determined by the colorimetric assay, were noted for blood (442 microgram-min/ml) and large intestine (285 microgram-min/g). Liver (29 microgram-min/g) had the lowest Cxt value, reflecting rapid metabolism of the compound by this organ. Color-producing material related to CCNU disappeared from the solid tissues of mice in a manner generally parallel to that for blood. Of the Cxt values for this compound and its products, those for lung (1753 microgram-equivalents-min/g), kidney (1633 microgram-equivalents-min/g), and small intestine (1557 microgram-equivalents-min/g) were highest. Consistent with its slower rate of metabolism, MeCCNU and its color-producing metabolites remained in most tissues of mice for 12 h following injection. Except for brain (1434 microgram-equivalents-min/g), Cxt values for this nitrosourea and its metabolites in tissues were higher than those of blood (5485 microgram-equivalents-min/ml), with kidney (15,324 micrograms-equivalents-min/g), liver (12,921 microgram-equivalents-min/g), and large intestine (11,501 microgram-equivalents-min/g) being highest. For each nitrosourea, a fair correlation was observed between the Cxt values for tissues and the toxic and/or antitumor effects at those sites.
In early studies of the antitumor drug 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(4-methylcyclohexyl)-1nitrosourea (methyl-CCNU), animal models consistently predicted that the compound would be nephrotoxic in humans. Nephrotoxicity in cancer patients who had received methyl-CCNU was not confirmed until about 6 years after clinical trials began. We have investigated the possibility that prochlorperazine, a commonly used antiemetic, might affect the development of nephrotoxicity. Prochlorperazine (1, 2, 5, and 8 mg/kg IP on days 1-3) produced a dose-related reduction in the concentrations of plasma urea nitrogen in mice that received nephrotoxic doses of methyl-CCNU (42, 52, or 63 mg/kg IP on day 1). The frequency and severity of renal lesions evaluated histopathologically were reduced significantly as the prochlorperazine dose increased. To study further this apparent protective activity of prochlorperazine, we chose a second nephrotoxin, mercuric chloride (HgCl2, 1 mg/kg IP on day 1) and a rodent species used more commonly as a model for nephrotoxicity, the rat. Prochlorperazine (2.5 or 10 mg/kg IP on days 1-5) inhibited HgCl2-induced urinary excretion of N-acetylglucosaminidase and leucine aminopeptidase. Urinary excretion of these enzymes on day 1 reflected proximal tubular epithelial degeneration and necrosis in rats that received HgCl2 alone. The severity of HgCl2-induced renal lesions evaluated histopathologically on day 16 was significantly reduced by combination treatment with prochlorperazine. Phenothiazines have numerous pharmacologic properties that might account for this observation, and additional studies will be required to establish the mechanism of this protective effect of prochlorperazine against acute nephrotoxicity in rodents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Lymphocyte cultures from the peripheral blood of 38 patients undergoing a cytostatic interval therapy with a regimen of methyl-CCNU (1-[2-chloroethyl-3-(4-methyl-cyclohexyl)]-1-nitrosourea), 5-fluorouracil, and vincristine (each 5-day course of therapy was followed by a therapy interval of 4 weeks) were supplied with 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BUDR) for the whole culture time to determine the sister chromatid labelling pattern. From a total of 92 individual blood samples sister chromatid exchange (SCE) studies were performed including analyses before the start of the therapy, and immediately and 4 weeks after each course of therapy. In addition, the frequency of first, second, and third metaphases in the 72-h cultures was estimated using the characteristic labelling patterns. A distinct increase of SCE frequency over the control level (i.e., lymphocyte cultures of patients before the start of therapy) was observed at all phases of therapy. It was clearly correlated with the number of courses of therapy up to course 7, later on the SCE rate remained more or less at the level reached. The influence of the composition of each drug regimen on the SCE rate was less pronounced than it was on the breakage rate. Moreover, although a clear correlation existed between the individual rates of breakage and SCE, the formation of the latter appeared to reflect a long-term effect of the therapy rather than did the formation of break aberrations. In addition, as the intercellular variability of the number of SCEs per cell was much higher than that of breaks, the interindividual variability (variation of the mean values for each patient) was small compared to the respective variability of breakage rates. The proportion of first, second, and third metaphases present in 72-h cultures evidently was influenced by single courses of therapy. The observed delay of proliferation was also reflected in different amounts of chromosome damage. Although the BUDR treatment enhanced the cytostatic effect of the therapy on the lymphocytes in culture rendering SCE analysis rather difficult in several cases, the other data of this study and in particular the experiences with the "long-term effect" make it imperative to include BUDR-labelling in further cytogenetic studies in subjects with exceptional exposure to chemicals. However, the SCE method can by no means, replace the classic cytogenetic analysis.
The chemotherapeutic activity of five cytostatic drugs was investigated experimentally in monotherapy and in two-drug combinations, using Yoshida sarcoma cells implanted into the wall of the glandular stomach of Sprague-Dawley rats. In monotherapy, the antibiotic agent mitomycin C and the nitrosourea methyl-CCNU exhibited the highest cytotoxic activity in this tumor model. In combination therapy, the combination of these two drugs was superior to all the other therapeutic schemes tested. In general, the results demonstrate a marked superiority of combination therapy in comparison with monotherapy.
Cells from a resistant ("Gr II") and a sensitive ("Str") human melanoma xenograft were incubated in vitro with O6-methylguanine for 2 h, subsequently treated with 1-(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitroso-3(4-methyl)-cyclohexylurea (MeCCNU) for 1 h and then plated in soft agar. In the resistant cells the O6-methylguanine pretreatment (2 mM) yielded an increase in sensitivity towards MeCCNU by a factor of 7.5. In the sensitive melanoma cells pretreatment with O6-methylguanine did not increase cytotoxicity. Human bone marrow cells from three normal donors were similarly pretreated with O6-methylguanine and MeCCNU. There was a clear increase in MeCCNU-induced cytotoxicity. We conclude, that while O6-methylguanine does potentiate the action of MeCCNU in resistant melanoma cells, the therapeutic usefulness of this treatment strategy may be limited.