PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Spinal Fractures”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Biomechanical study of canine spinal fracture fixation using pins or bone screws with polymethylmethacrylate.

Five configurations of pins or screws interconnected with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) were applied to isolated canine lumbar spines (L2 to L5) in which a complete fracture-luxation had been produced at L3 to L4. Twenty-five repaired spines and five intact control spines were subjected to four-point bending and tested once to failure in ventral flexion. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of pin number, pin angle, and use of 3.5-mm cortical bone screws instead of smooth 3.2-mm diameter pins on rigidity and ultimate strength of spinal fractures repaired by the implant-PMMA fixation technique. Bending moment versus the angular deformation curves were recorded. Rigidity, bending moment at 10 degrees angular deformation, moment at failure, and deformation at failure of each type of fixation were compared using analysis of variance. Spinal segments stabilized with eight pin-PMMA fixation had significantly greater rigidity and strength at failure than four pin-PMMA fixations (P < .05). Furthermore, spinal segments stabilized with eight pins angled away from the fracture failed at significantly greater bending moment than those with eight pins angled toward the fracture (P < .05). However, for four-pin fixation, greater strength was achieved by angling pins in the bone toward the fracture site (P < .05). Screw-PMMA fixations failed by screw bending and were less rigid and weaker at failure than the corresponding configuration of pin-PMMA fixation (P < .05).

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Bone histomorphometry of the iliac crest, and spinal fracture prevalence in atrophic and hypertrophic osteoarthritis of the hip.

While some authors report high bone density in osteoarthritis (OA), surgical experience with total hip arthroplasty (THA) for primary OA suggests the existence of osteoporotic subsets of patients. To identify these we analysed 107 iliac crest bone biopsies, taken at THA, by routine histomorphometry for trabecular structural and bone turnover features, and examined radiographs of the spine for vertebral fractures. Patients were grouped by hip osteophyte size (none, atrophic; small, hypotrophic; moderate, supertrophic; large, hypertrophic OA), and by major architectural disorganization of the hip (hip joint destruction, protrusio). We found hip joint destruction to be 3 times more common in atrophic than in supertrophic and hypertrophic OA (p less than 0.05). Overall, the OA patients had lower bone volume (p less than 0.05) and thinner trabeculae (p less than 0.05) than controls. Worst affected were patients with hip joint destruction and with protrusio: they also had fewer and more widely spaced trabeculae than controls (p less than 0.05). The spinal fracture prevalence was highest in patients with hip joint destruction (higher than in the general population), intermediate in those with protrusio or atrophic OA, and lowest in patients with supertrophic or hypertrophic OA. We conclude that OA hip patients with joint destruction or protrusio have a high prevalence of generalized osteoporosis, and that the larger the hip osteophytes, the lower is the prevalence of generalized osteoporosis. Our findings suggest that the generalized bone status may influence the outcome of OA of the hip.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1988

The neurological outcome following surgery for spinal fractures.

Sixty consecutive patients with spinal injuries and encroachment upon the spinal canal of greater than 20% were assessed for neurological outcome. The patients were divided into two groups, those undergoing posterior surgery alone, and those undergoing anterior surgery for formal decompression with or without anterior or posterior instrumentation. In those patients undergoing posterior surgery, an improvement rate in the neurological function of 83% was noted in patients with incomplete lesions, whereas an 88% improvement rate was found in those undergoing the anterior procedure. There was no statistical difference in outcome between these two groups. Positive correlations were found between the level of injury and Frankel grades. The cord lesions tended to demonstrate more severe neurological deficit, whereas the cauda equina lesions were associated with a lesser severity of neurologic deficit. A component of dislocation to the injury also resulted in a more severe neurological deficit. There was no apparent difference between the degree of bony encroachment of the spinal canal and the initial Frankel grade, nor was there a clear difference between those patients undergoing anterior versus posterior surgery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Multiple-level noncontiguous spinal fractures.

Double-level noncontiguous spinal injury is a more common occurrence than generally appreciated. A large number of these patients have neurological injury. Because these injuries occur in patients who meet the criteria for categorization as multiple trauma patients, we feel that a complete radiographic survey of the spine must be accomplished in the emergency room in any situation where clinical assessment is impaired. Treatment must be individualized with the same guidelines for treatment as for the isolated injury in the majority of circumstances.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

[Simplified surgical technique and decreased radiation exposure in dorsal stabilization of spinal fractures].

The dorsal approach for reposition and stabilisation of dorsal and lumbal spine fractures is widely accepted. It is much easier for the surgeon and with lower risk for the patient. For placement of the pedicle screws 3 steps with X-ray fluoroscopy in transversal and anteroposterior direction are necessary: K-wire placement in the pedicle, drill for opening the pedicle and finally screw placement. With the use of two fluoroscopes and a central cannulated drill which is placed over the K-wire the operation gets much shorter, easier and the fluoroscopy time can be reduced significantly.

Bone Wires↗