PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Syndecan-2”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

135 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Proteolysis-inducing factor differentially influences transcriptional regulation in endothelial subtypes.

Proteolysis-inducing factor (PIF) is a novel sulfated glycoprotein initially identified as a protein capable of triggering muscle proteolysis during the process of cancer cachexia. Only skeletal muscle and liver exhibit substantial binding of PIF in adult tissue. Here, we demonstrate that PIF induces transcriptional regulation in both the liver endothelial cell line SK-HEP-1 and in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) but not in pulmonary artery endothelial cells. PIF differentially induces activation of nuclear factor-kappaB, resulting in the induction of proinflammatory cytokines [interleukin (IL)-8 and IL-6] and increased expression of the cell surface proteins intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule in SK-HEP-1 and HUVECs only. In addition, PIF induces the shedding of syndecans from the cell surface. Syndecans are involved in wound repair, metastasis of cancers, and embryonic development. These results suggest that PIF may play additional roles in the proinflammatory response observed in cancer cachexia but may also have a role without the cachectic process.

Blood Proteins↗

Left-right asymmetry: nodal points.

The striking left-right asymmetry of visceral organs is known to depend on left- and right-side-specific cascades of gene expression during early embryogenesis. Now, developmental biologists are characterizing the earliest steps in asymmetry determination that dictate the sidedness of asymmetric gene expression. The proteins and structures involved control fascinating physiological processes, such as extracellular fluid flow and membrane voltage potential and yet little is known about how their activities are coordinated to control laterality. By analogy with intercellular signalling in certain epithelial and endothelial cells, however, it is reasonable to speculate that at least three of these players, monocilia, gap junction communication and the Ca2+ channel polycystin-2, participate in a signalling pathway that propagates left-right cues through multicellular fields.

Animals↗

Analyses of beta-1 syntrophin, syndecan 2 and gem GTPase as candidates for chicken muscular dystrophy.

Despite intensive studies of muscular dystrophy of chicken, the responsible gene has not yet been identified. Our recent studies mapped the genetic locus for abnormal muscle (AM) of chicken with muscular dystrophy to chromosome 2q using the Kobe University (KU) resource family, and revealed the chromosome region where the AM gene is located has conserved synteny to human chromosome 8q11-24.3, where the beta-1 syntrophin (SNTB1), syndecan 2 (SDC2) and Gem GTPase (GEM) genes are located. It is reasonable to assume those genes might be candidates for the AM gene. In this study, we cloned and sequenced the chicken SNTB1, SDC2 and GEM genes, and identified sequence polymorphisms between parents of the resource family. The polymorphisms were genotyped to place these genes on the chicken linkage map. The AM gene of chromosome 2q was mapped 130 cM from the distal end, and closely linked to calbindin 1 (CALB1). SNTB1 and SDC2 genes were mapped 88.5 cM distal and 27.6 cM distal from the AM gene, while the GEM gene was mapped 18.5 cM distal from the AM gene and 9.1 cM proximal from SDC2. Orthologues of SNTB1, SDC2 and GEM were syntenic to human chromosome 8q. SNTB1, SDC2 and GEM did not correspond to the AM gene locus, suggesting it is unlikely they are related to chicken muscular dystrophy. However, this result also suggests that the genes located in the proximal region of the CALB1 gene on human chromosome 8q are possible candidates for this disease.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Heparan sulfate proteoglycan expression is induced during early erythroid differentiation of multipotent hematopoietic stem cells.

Heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans of bone marrow (BM) stromal cells and their extracellular matrix are important components of the microenvironment of hematopoietic tissues and are involved in the interaction of hematopoietic stem and stromal cells. Although previous studies have emphasized the role of HS proteoglycan synthesis by BM stromal cells, we have recently shown that the human hematopoietic progenitor cell line TF-1 also expressed an HS proteoglycan. Immunochemical, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and Northern blot analysis of this HS proteoglycan showed that it was not related to the syndecan family of HS proteoglycans or to glypican. To answer the question of whether the expression of HS proteoglycans is associated with the differentiation state of hematopoietic progenitor cells, we have analyzed the proteoglycan synthesis of several murine and human hematopoietic progenitor cell lines. Proteoglycans were isolated from metabolically labeled cells and purified by several chromatographic steps. Isolation and characterization of proteoglycans from the cell lines HEL and ELM-D, which like TF-1 cells have an immature erythroid phenotype, showed that these cells synthesize the same HS proteoglycan, previously detected in TF-1 cells, as a major proteoglycan. In contrast, cell lines of the myeloid lineage, like the myeloblastic/promyelocytic cell lines B1 and B2, do not express HS proteoglycans. Taken together, our data strongly suggest that expression of this HS proteoglycan in hematopoietic progenitor cell lines is associated with the erythroid lineage. To prove this association we have analyzed the proteoglycan expression in the nonleukemic multipotent stem cell line FDCP-Mix-A4 after induction of erythroid or granulocytic differentiation. Our data show that HS proteoglycan expression is induced during early erythroid differentiation of multipotent hematopoietic stem cells. In contrast, during granulocytic differentiation, no expression of HS proteoglycans was observed.

Cell Differentiation↗

Growth factors regulate the expression profile of their syndecan co-receptors and the differentiation of mesothelioma cells.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse malignant pleural mesotheliomas are locally aggressive and highly lethal tumors that are becoming more common. The tumor derives from pluripotential mesothelial stem cells, which differentiate into epithelial or mesenchymal elements. Tumors with a predominantly epithelial growth pattern have a better prognosis than the sarcomatous and mixed types, the phenotype being important for the biology of the tumor. We have previously shown that mesotheliomas express a wide range of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), particularly syndecans, which interact with growth factors and matrix components. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was undertaken to examine the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of mesothelioma cells by exposing epithelially-differentiated cells to an array of growth factors. Following substitution with TGF-beta 2, EGF, FGF-2, IGF-I and PDGF-BB, the expression levels of syndecans-1, -2 and -4 were monitored at selected times (30 minutes, 6 hours and 18 hours) by semi-quantitative RT-PCR and FACS analysis. The morphological appearance and proliferation rate of the treated cells was correlated to the PG profile obtained and to the subcellular compartmentalization of PGs. RESULTS: An early response was obtained only for syndecan-4. Changes in the differentiation pattern appeared later. Exposure to EGF and IGF-I induced a fibroblast-like morphology, simultaneously with a reduced expression of syndecans-1 and 2. TGF-beta 2 enhanced the focal contacts and showed a marked up-regulation of syndecan-4 and down-regulation of syndecan-1. Interestingly, TGF-beta 2 delayed the nuclear transport of syndecan-1 concomitantly with an antiproliferative effect. CONCLUSION: Growth factor signalling seems to be delicately controlled by an autoregulatory loop involving the syndecan expression levels and amounts of soluble HS chains shed into the medium.

Cell Differentiation↗

Differential expression of transmembrane proteoglycans in vascular smooth muscle cells.

Rat aortic vascular smooth muscle (VSM) cells synthesize the transmembrane proteoglycan syndecan (Cizmeci-Smith, G., Asundi, V., Stahl, R. C., Teichman, L. J., Chernousov, M., Cowan, K., and Carey, D. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15729-15736). The present work demonstrated that VSM cells synthesize the related transmembrane proteoglycan fibroglycan and that increased expression of these two proteoglycans is stimulated under different conditions. Fibroglycan synthesis by cultured rat aortic VSM cells was demonstrated by Northern blot analysis with a rat fibroglycan cDNA probe and immunoblot analysis with anti-rat fibroglycan antibodies. Effects of growth factors and vasoactive substances on syndecan and fibroglycan expression were examined by Northern blot analysis. Syndecan mRNA levels increased in response to stimulation of VSM cells with serum, platelet-derived growth factor, or angiotensin II. VSM cells stimulated with platelet-derived growth factor contained more syndecan core protein and processed syndecan than control cells. Fibroglycan mRNA levels either decreased or remained unchanged in response to these agents. Fibroglycan mRNA levels increased following transforming growth factor-beta stimulation, while syndecan mRNA levels decreased. Other agents, including basic fibroblast growth factor, endothelin, and carbacyclin did not alter the expression of either proteoglycan. Syndecan and fibroglycan mRNA levels also varied as a function of cell density. These data demonstrate that syndecan and fibroglycan expression are regulated differently in VSM cells and lend support to the hypothesis that these proteoglycans carry out distinct physiological functions.

Angiotensin II↗

Reciprocal gene expression of rat fibroglycan and beta-actin during the course of regeneration after D-galactosamine liver injury.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Fibroglycan (FG) is a major heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) in the rat liver that is mainly distributed on the surface of hepatocytes. HSPG may play some important roles in the regeneration of liver by interacting with various growth factors such as bFGF and HB-EGF. However, little is known about the function of FG. We reported that after injury caused by D-galactosamine, regeneration started on the following day and peaked on day 2. To clarify the function of FG in liver regeneration, we investigated the gene expression of FG during regeneration after D-galactosamine injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were given D-galactosamine on day 0. Liver RNA was collected from day 0 to day 7. The gene expression of FG and beta-actin (as a representative cytoskeleton) was examined by Northern and/or Slot blotting. RESULTS: FG gene expression was markedly decreased on day 2, but totally recovered on day 3. In contrast, beta-actin gene expression was markedly increased on day 2 and returned to the normal level on day 3. Expression of the FG and beta-actin genes was reciprocal. CONCLUSION: FG expression is transiently suppressed when cytoskeleton gene expression is enhanced at the early phase of liver regeneration.

Actins↗