SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Targeting chromatin regulators”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

PubMed2006

Btg2 enhances retinoic acid-induced differentiation by modulating histone H4 methylation and acetylation.

Retinoic acid controls hematopoietic differentiation through the transcription factor activity of its receptors. They act on specific target genes by recruiting protein complexes that deacetylate or acetylate histones and modify chromatin status. The regulation of this process is affected by histone methyltransferases, which can inhibit or activate transcription depending on their amino acid target. We show here that retinoic acid treatment of hematopoietic cells induces the expression of BTG2. Overexpression of this protein increases RARalpha transcriptional activity and the differentiation response to retinoic acid of myeloid leukemia cells and CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors. In the absence of retinoic acid, BTG2 is present in the RARalpha transcriptional complex, together with the arginine methyltransferase PRMT1 and Sin3A. Overexpressed BTG2 increases PRMT1 participation in the RARalpha protein complex on the RARbeta promoter, a target gene model, and enhances gene-specific histone H4 arginine methylation. Upon RA treatment Sin3A, BTG2, and PRMT1 detach from RARalpha and thereafter BGT2 and PRMT1 are driven to the cytoplasm. These events prime histone H4 demethylation and acetylation. Overall, our data show that BTG2 contributes to retinoic acid activity by favoring differentiation through a gene-specific modification of histone H4 arginine methylation and acetylation levels.

Acetylation↗

PubMed2006

An integrated map of p53-binding sites and histone modification in the human ENCODE regions.

TP53 (tumor protein p53; p53) regulates its target genes under various cellular stresses. By combining chromatin immunoprecipitation with oligonucleotide microarrays, we have mapped binding sites of p53 (p53-BS) in the genome of HCT116 human colon carcinoma cells, along with those of acetylated H3, acetylated H4, and methylated H3-K4. We analyzed a 30-Mb portion of the human genome selected as a representative model by the ENCODE Consortium. In the region, we found 37 p53-BS, of which the p53-binding motif was present in 32 (86%). Acetylated histone H3 and H4 were detected at 14 (38%) and 33 (89%) of the p53-BS, respectively. A significant portion (58%) of H4 acetylation in the p53-BS was not accompanied by H3 acetylation. Acetyl H3 were preferentially located at the 5' and 3' ends of genes, whereas acetyl H4 were distributed widely across the genome. These results provide novel insights into how p53 binding coordinates with histone modification in human.

Acetylation↗

PubMed1999

Composite co-activator ARC mediates chromatin-directed transcriptional activation.

Gene activation in eukaryotes is regulated by complex mechanisms in which the recruitment and assembly of the transcriptional machinery is directed by gene- and cell-type-specific DNA-binding proteins. When DNA is packaged into chromatin, the regulation of gene activation requires new classes of chromatin-targeting activity. In humans, a multisubunit cofactor functions in a chromatin-selective manner to potentiate synergistic gene activation by the transcriptional activators SREBP-1a and Sp1. Here we show that this activator-recruited cofactor (ARC) interacts directly with several different activators, including SREBP-1a, VP16 and the p65 subunit of NF-kappaB, and strongly enhances transcription directed by these activators in vitro with chromatin-assembled DNA templates. The ARC complex consists of 16 or more subunits; some of these are novel gene products, whereas others are present in other multisubunit cofactors, such as CRSP, NAT and mammalian Mediator. Detailed analysis indicates that the ARC complex is probably identical to the nuclear hormone-receptor cofactor DRIP. Thus, ARC/DRIP is a large composite co-activator that belongs to a family of related cofactors and is targeted by different classes of activator to mediate transcriptional stimulation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2002

The active site of the SET domain is constructed on a knot.

The SET domain contains the catalytic center of lysine methyltransferases that target the N-terminal tails of histones and regulate chromatin function. Here we report the structure of the SET7/9 protein in the absence and presence of its cofactor product, S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (AdoHcy). A knot within the SET domain helps form the methyltransferase active site, where AdoHcy binds and lysine methylation is likely to occur. A structure-guided comparison of sequences within the SET protein family suggests that the knot substructure and active site environment are conserved features of the SET domain.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2004

Broad spectrum identification of cellular small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) substrate proteins.

Reversible covalent modification of proteins with a small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) is emerging as an important system contributing to dynamic regulation of protein function. To enhance our understanding of the cell regulatory systems impacted by sumoylation, we used affinity chromatography-coupled high pressure liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry for unbiased identification of candidate cellular SUMO substrate proteins. Here we describe the identification of 21 candidate sumoylated proteins from whole-cell lysates of HEK-293 cells. The nature of the proteins identified is consistent with a role for sumoylation in diverse cell regulatory systems but highlights regulation of chromatin organization and gene expression as major systems targeted by the sumoylation machinery.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed2006

GammaH2AX and its role in DNA double-strand break repair.

One of the earliest responses to a DNA double-strand break (DSB) is the carboxy-terminal phosphorylation of budding yeast H2A (metazoan histone H2AX) to create gammaH2A (or gammaH2AX). This chromatin modification stretches more than tens of kilobases around the DSB and has been proposed to play numerous roles in break recognition and repair, although it may not be the primary signal for many of these events. Studies suggest that gammaH2A(X) has 2 more direct roles: (i) to recruit cohesin around the DSB, and (ii) to maintain a checkpoint arrest. Recent work has identified other factors, including chromatin remodelers and protein phosphatases, which target gammaH2A(X) and regulate DSB repair/recovery.

DNA↗

PubMed2003

Transcriptional activation by thyroid hormone receptor-beta involves chromatin remodeling, histone acetylation, and synergistic stimulation by p300 and steroid receptor coactivators.

Transcriptional regulation by heterodimers of thyroid hormone receptor (TR) and the 9-cis retinoid X receptor (RXR) is a highly complex process involving a large number of accessory factors, as well as chromatin remodeling. We have used a biochemical approach, including an in vitro chromatin assembly and transcription system that accurately recapitulates ligand- and activation function (AF)-2-dependent transcriptional activation by TRbeta/RXRalpha heterodimers, as well as in vitro chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, to study the mechanisms of TRbeta-mediated transcription with chromatin templates. Using this approach, we show that chromatin is required for robust ligand-dependent activation by TRbeta. We also show that the binding of liganded TRbeta to chromatin induces promoter-proximal chromatin remodeling and histone acetylation, and that histone acetylation is correlated with increased TRbeta-dependent transcription. Additionally, we find that steroid receptor coactivators (SRCs) and p300 function synergistically to stimulate TRbeta-dependent transcription, with multiple functional domains of p300 contributing to its coactivator activity with TRbeta. A major conclusion from our experiments is that the primary role of the SRC proteins is to recruit p300/cAMP response element binding protein-binding protein to hormone-regulated promoters. Together, our results suggest a multiple step pathway for transcriptional regulation by liganded TRbeta, including chromatin remodeling, recruitment of coactivators, targeted histone acetylation, and recruitment of the RNA polymerase II transcriptional machinery. Our studies highlight the functional importance of chromatin in transcriptional control and further define the molecular mechanisms by which the SRC and p300 coactivators facilitate transcriptional activation by liganded TRbeta.

Acetylation↗

PubMed2001

Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis fails to support the latency model for regulation of p53 DNA binding activity in vivo.

p53 can adopt two forms in vitro, a latent form that binds naked DNA poorly and an active form that binds DNA well. Conversion of the latent form to the active form is thought to occur by an allosteric mechanism induced by phosphorylation and acetylation. Despite the large differences in affinity produced by regulatory modifications in vitro, mutation of putative regulatory sites has not produced correspondingly large effects on transcription of p53 target genes in vivo. To determine whether genotoxic stress regulates DNA binding by p53 in vivo, we have performed quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays on tumor and normal cell lines containing wild-type p53. ChIP recovers several hundredfold more p21 and MDM2 promoter DNA from p53 wild-type than p53-null cells, indicating that the assay is specific for p53. Genotoxic stress induces much smaller increases in chromatin precipitation, which are matched by changes in the p53 protein level. Thus, in the experimental systems tested, allosteric regulation of DNA binding is not a major level of regulation of p53 activity. The p53 target genes tested can be divided into a group showing high promoter occupancy in vivo (p21, MDM2, and PUMA) and a group giving substantially weaker or background p53 binding (bax, AIP1, and PIG3). Neither group shows selective recruitment of p53 to the promoter in cells undergoing apoptosis, indicating that the decision to undergo apoptosis or cell cycle arrest depends on other changes in the cell.

Allosteric Site↗

PubMed2026

Driver genomic lesions in MDM2, CDK4, and JUN co-opt targetable super-enhancer networks to impose liposarcomagenic core regulatory circuitry.

INTRODUCTION: Amplification of chromosome 12q13-15 spanning MDM2 and CDK4 genes serves as a molecular diagnostic hallmark of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), an aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma. Epigenetic activation of master transcription factors (RUNX proteins, FOSL2, and MYC) establishes a self-reinforcing oncogenic transcriptional circuitry in DDLPS. Nevertheless, the collaborative interplay between genomic alterations and epigenetic dysregulation in defining DDLPS cell identity remains elusive. OBJECTIVES: This work aimed to elucidate the primary genetic drivers and mechanistic basis of DDLPS-specific core transcriptional regulatory circuitry. METHODS: We performed integrative chromatin profiling analysis of DDLPS clinical specimens and cell lines to map cis-regulatory landscapes. Cistromes of MDM2, JUN, and E2F1 were delineated through chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing in two DDLPS models. Essential driver functions and transcriptional regulatory effects of key regulators were assessed via various genetic manipulation approaches. Synergistic interactions between BET-targeting agents and MDM2/p53 or CDK4 inhibitors were quantified by cell viability assays. In vivo xenograft assays evaluated the oncogenic potential of key regulators and the therapeutic efficacy of novel strategies. RESULTS: Co-amplification of MDM2, CDK4, and JUN during sarcomagenesis converges with BET protein-dependent chromatin remodeling to fuel feed-forward transcriptional circuits among master transcription factors. Mechanistically, excessively expressed MDM2 stabilizes the core regulatory circuitry by forming chromatin-bound complexes with JUN/FOSL2 at cis-regulatory elements, especially super-enhancers across DDLPS genome. Concurrently, CDK4 maintains expression of E2F1 which further fosters transcriptional output of master transcription factors in DDLPS cells. Leveraging DDLPS-selective overexpression of MDM2 and its E3 ligase activity, targeted degradation of BET proteins by MDM2-recruiting proteolysis targeting chimera selectively disrupted the core regulatory circuitry, suppressing DDLPS growth and exhibiting strong synergy with CDK4 inhibitor. CONCLUSION: DDLPS-associated genomic lesions collaborate with BET-dependent chromatin regulation to establish disease-sustaining transcriptional circuitry. Our findings also provide a mechanistic rationale for harnessing MDM2's E3 ligase activity to therapeutically degrade oncoproteins in MDM2-amplified malignancies.

Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry↗

PubMed2004

Regulation of cell signalling cascades by steroid hormones.

Steroid hormones control a wide variety of cellular functions important for cell homeostasis, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Evidence collected in the last few years indicates that this regulation is mediated by a complex interface of direct control of gene expression (so-called "transcriptional" action, driven by receptors that are localized in cell nucleus) and by regulation of cell signaling/phosphorylation cascades ("extranuclear" action, mediated by receptors that are localized in close proximity to cellular membrane). Regulation of gene expression takes place via ligand-dependent receptor binding to target gene promoters as part of the preinitiation complex, which leads to chromatin remodeling and ultimately regulates the rate of gene expression. Steroid-mediated regulation of cell signaling does not depend on gene transcription or protein biosynthesis. The molecular mechanism of this phenomenon is not fully understood. This review will focus on recent developments related to our understanding of the molecular mechanism of the extranuclear action of steroid hormones.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Amphibian metamorphosis as a model for the developmental actions of thyroid hormone.

Thyroid hormone (TH) elicits multiple physiological actions in vertebrates from fish to man. These actions can be divided into two broad categories: those where the hormone regulates developmental processes and those that involve actions in the adult organism. Amphibian metamorphosis is a most dramatic example of extensive morphological, biochemical and cellular changes occurring during post-embryonic development, which is obligatorily initiated and sustained by TH. It is, therefore, an ideal model system to understand the action of the hormone. Each tissue of the frog tadpole responds differently to TH, ranging from altered gene expression, morphogenesis, tissue re-structuring and extensive cell death, according to a developmental programme set in place before the thyroid gland begins to secrete the hormone. The key element determining the response to the hormone is the nuclear thyroid hormone receptor (TR). As in most vertebrates, there are two thyroid hormone receptors, TRalpha and TRbeta, which repress transcription in the absence of the ligand and whose concentration in the tissues is directly modulated by the hormone itself. In Xenopus, biochemical and in situ techniques have shown that the amount of TRbeta mRNA and protein are elevated 50-100 times during TH-induced metamorphic climax. This phenomenon of "autoinduction" of receptor is also seen with developmental or inductive processes regulated by other hormones acting through nuclear receptors. It is possible that receptor upregulation may be a pre-requisite for hormonal response. Recent molecular and cell biological studies have suggested that TRs function as multimeric complexes with other nuclear or chromatin proteins, such as co-repressors and co-activators, to regulate the structure of the chromatin, and thereby determine the transcription of the receptor-specified target gene. There is evidence that this may also be so for thyroid hormone regulated transcription during amphibian metamorphosis.

Amphibians↗

PubMed2006

Ataxin-3 represses transcription via chromatin binding, interaction with histone deacetylase 3, and histone deacetylation.

Ataxin-3 (AT3), the disease protein in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3), has been associated with the ubiquitin-proteasome system and transcriptional regulation. Here we report that normal AT3 binds to target DNA sequences in specific chromatin regions of the matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) gene promoter and represses transcription by recruitment of the histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3), the nuclear receptor corepressor (NCoR), and deacetylation of histones bound to the promoter. Both normal and expanded AT3 physiologically interacted with HDAC3 and NCoR in a SCA3 cell model and human pons tissue; however, normal AT3-containing protein complexes showed increased histone deacetylase activity, whereas expanded AT3-containing complexes had reduced deacetylase activity. Consistently, histone analyses revealed an increased acetylation of total histone H3 in expanded AT3-expressing cells and human SCA3 pons. Expanded AT3 lost the repressor function and displayed altered DNA/chromatin binding that was not associated with recruitment of HDAC3, NCoR, and deacetylation of the promoter, allowing aberrant MMP-2 transcription via the transcription factor GATA-2. For transcriptional repression normal AT3 cooperates with HDAC3 and requires its intact ubiquitin-interacting motifs (UIMs), whereas aberrant transcriptional activation by expanded AT3 is independent of the UIMs but requires the catalytic cysteine of the ubiquitin protease domain. These findings demonstrate that normal AT3 binds target promoter regions and represses transcription of a GATA-2-dependent target gene via formation of histone-deacetylating repressor complexes requiring its UIM-associated function. Expanded AT3 aberrantly activates transcription via its catalytic site and loses the ability to form deacetylating repressor complexes on target chromatin regions.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

PubMed2004

MAP kinase-mediated stress relief that precedes and regulates the timing of transcriptional induction.

In yeast, hyperosmotic stress causes an immediate dissociation of most proteins from chromatin, presumably because cells are unprepared for, and initially unresponsive to, increased ion concentrations in the nucleus. Osmotic stress activates Hog1 MAP kinase, which phosphorylates at least two proteins located at the plasma membrane, the Nha1 Na+/H+ antiporter and the Tok1 potassium channel. Hog1 phosphorylation stimulates Nha1 activity, and this is crucial for the rapid reassociation of proteins with their target sites in chromatin. This initial response to hyperosmolarity precedes and temporally regulates the activation of stress-response genes that depends on Hog1 phosphorylation of transcription factors in the nucleus. Thus, a single MAP kinase coordinates temporally, spatially, and mechanistically distinct responses to stress, thereby providing very rapid stress relief that facilitates subsequent changes in gene expression that permit long-term adaptation to harsh environmental conditions.

Cation Transport Proteins↗

PubMed2000

Gene regulation through chromatin remodelling by members of the nuclear receptor superfamily.

The intracellular receptors for steroid hormones, thyroid hormones, retinoids and vitamin D(3) are known to bind to specific DNA elements and thus regulate target gene expression. This introductory review and the following papers address some of the mechanisms underlying this action. In particular, the ability of this family of transcription factors to recruit multi-protein complexes that have the capacity to remodel chromatin structure in order to silence or activate target gene expression is discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Multiple Promoter Targeting Sequences exist in Abdominal-B to regulate long-range gene activation.

In complex genomes, insulators set up chromatin domain boundaries and protect promoters from inappropriate activation by enhancers from neighboring genes. The Drosophila Abdominal-B locus uses insulator elements to organize its large regulatory region into several body segment-specific chromatin domains. This organization leads to a problem in enhancer-promoter communication, that is, how do distal enhancers activate the Abd-B promoter when there are several insulators in between? This issue is partially resolved by the Promoter Targeting Sequence, which can overcome the enhancer blocking effect of an insulator. In this study, we describe a new Promoter Targeting Sequence, PTS-6, from the Abd-B 3' regulatory region. PTS-6, comprised of approximately 200 bp, was found to bypass both homologous Abdominal-B insulators, such as Fab-7 and Fab-8, and a heterologous insulator, suHw. Most importantly, it also overcomes a combination of two insulators such as Fab-7/Fab-8. Thus, PTS-6 could, in principle, target remote enhancers that are separated from the Abd-B promoter by multiple insulators. In addition, PTS-6 selectively targets the distal enhancer to only one transgenic promoter, and it strongly facilitates Abd-B enhancers. These results suggest that promoter targeting is necessary for long-range enhancer-promoter communication in Abd-B, and PTS elements could be a common occurrence in large, complex genetic loci.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Induction of progesterone target genes requires activation of Erk and Msk kinases and phosphorylation of histone H3.

How genes are regulated in the context of chromatin is a central question of biology. Steroid hormones control gene expression via interaction of their receptors with target sequences on DNA but can also activate cytoplasmic signaling cascades. Here we report that rapid Erk activation by progestins participates in induction of target genes by preparing the chromatin for transcription. Five minutes after hormone treatment, Erk activation leads to phosphorylation of the progesterone receptor (PR), activation of Msk1, and recruitment of a complex of the three proteins to a nucleosome on the MMTV promoter. Msk1 phosphorylates histone H3, leading to displacement of HP1gamma and recruitment of Brg1 and RNA polymerase II. Cell-free experiments show a direct interaction between PR, Erk, and Msk1 and support the importance of H3 phosphorylation for nucleosome remodeling. Inhibition of Msk1 activation blocks recruitment of the kinase complex, H3 phosphorylation, and HP1gamma displacement, thus precluding remodeling and induction of the promoter.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling subunit BAF57 is a critical regulator of estrogen receptor function in breast cancer cells.

Estrogen receptors (ERs) play critical roles in both normal mammary gland development and in the formation and progression of breast tumors, constituting a major therapeutic target for breast cancer treatment. We have previously described that ER transcriptional activity is potentiated by BAF57, a core subunit of the mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. Here we provide evidence demonstrating an important role for BAF57 as regulator of ER functions in breast cancer cells. Different experimental manipulations leading to the abrogation of BAF57 expression and/or function severely reduced the expression of various endogenous ER target genes and blocked estrogen-stimulated proliferation in ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells. Moreover, using a structure-function analysis, we have defined the protein domains required for the functional interaction between ERalpha and BAF57, including a key region within the hinge of ERalpha that is essential for BAF57 recruitment and its function on ER-mediated transcription. Interestingly, we found that BAF57 is an ER subtype-selective modulator that specifically regulates ERalpha-mediated transcription. Taken together, our results suggest that targeting BAF57 could represent a new way to effectively inhibit the action of ERalpha.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2005

The ErbB3-binding protein Ebp1 suppresses androgen receptor-mediated gene transcription and tumorigenesis of prostate cancer cells.

Down-regulation of the androgen receptor (AR) is being evaluated as an effective therapy for the advanced stages of prostate cancer. We report that Ebp1, a protein identified by its interactions with the ErbB3 receptor, down-regulates expression of AR and AR-regulated genes in the LNCaP prostate cancer cell line. Using microarray analysis, we identified six endogenous AR target genes, including the AR itself, that are down-regulated by ebp1 overexpression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that Ebp1 was recruited to the prostate-specific antigen gene promoter in response to the androgen antagonist bicalutamide, suggesting that Ebp1 directly affected the expression of AR-regulated genes in response to androgen antagonists. Ebp1 expression was reduced in cells that had become androgen-independent. Androgens failed to stimulate either the growth of ebp1 transfectants or transcription of AR-regulated reporter genes in these cells. The agonist activity of the antiandrogen cyproterone acetate was abolished in ebp1 transfectants. In severe combined immunodeficient mice, Ebp1 overexpression resulted in a reduced incidence of LNCaP tumors and slower tumor growth. These findings suggest that Ebp1 is a previously unrecognized therapeutic target for treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗