PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “anticancer”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Mutagenicity of anticancer drugs in mammalian germ cells.

The evidence for mammalian germ cell mutagenicity induced by anticancer drugs is summarized. Primary attention is paid to the three major mouse germ cell mutagenicity tests- the dominant lethal, heritable translocation, and morphological specific locus tests- from which most germ cell mutagenicity data historically have been obtained. Of the 21 anticancer drugs reviewed, 16 have been tested in one or more of these three tests; with all 16 tested in the most common germ cell test, the male dominant lethal test, and 9 of the 16 also tested in the female dominant lethal test. The patterns of germ cell stage specificity for most of the anticancer drugs are similar, and generally resemble the patterns seen with other types of chemicals; however, some of the patterns are unique. For example, 2 of the 8 chemicals shown to induce dominant lethal mutations in female oocytes, do not induce dominant lethal mutations in male germ cells (adriamycin and platinol). Ten of the 16 chemicals tested in the dominant lethal test were positive in post-meiotic stages (spermatids through mature sperm), and seven also induced reciprocal translocations and/or specific locus mutations in post-meiotic stages. This propensity to induce mutations in post-meiotic stages has been observed with most mutagens. However, 5 of the anticancer drugs also induced dominant lethal mutations in spermatocytes (meiotic prophase cells) and one of them, 6-mercaptopurine, uniquely induced dominant lethal mutations exclusively in preleptotene spermatocytes. Finally, three of the anticancer drugs (melphalan, mitomycin C, procarbazine) are members of a very select group of chemicals shown to induce specific locus mutations in spermatogonial stem cells of mice. The implications for human risk are discussed.

Animals↗

The linking of anticancer drugs, cell cycle blocks, and differentiation: implications in the search for antineoplastic drugs.

The quest for anticancer drugs has been primarily directed at agents that interfere with cell replication, yet the basis for drug-induced cytotoxicity remains unsolved. In our previous studies we noted a relationship between a mitotic block and commitment to terminal differentiation in the murine (Friend) erythroleukemia (FEL) cell. Since anticancer drugs are known to often block cell cycle transit typically in G2/mitosis, we tested a number of anticancer drugs with various modes of action and found that they all committed FEL cells to differentiate. Furthermore, other G2/mitosis-blocking drugs were also effective in inducing commitment. These results suggest (1) a causal relationship involving anticancer drugs, cell cycle block and differentiation, (2) that the search for new anticancer drugs utilize a differentiation assay and include G2/mitosis-blocking agents.

Animals↗

A novel approach to develop anti-HIV drugs: adapting non-nucleoside anticancer chemotherapeutics.

Some anticancer drugs, but not all, inhibit replication of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and thus, exhibit a therapeutic potential. Such drugs, unlike the traditional HIV enzyme inhibitors, could suppress HIV strains that are resistant to inhibitors of viral enzymes, decrease proviral burden in vivo, or reduce reservoirs of infection via killing infected cells. Thus, they may be an effective adjunct therapy or perhaps result in a cure. The incidence of HIV infection and AIDS mortalities continue to increase worldwide, including the United States and parts of Africa, with a parallel increase in a number of other manifestations, including AIDS defining malignancies. The basis for continual spread of HIV presumably in large part stems from the viral resistance to previously successful drugs and the lack of curative antiretroviral drugs. To reverse these trends, other approaches for AIDS therapy must be developed. One possibility is the development of potent anticancer drugs, that exhibit anti-HIV activities. At least four chemically and pharmacologically distinct classes of anticancer drugs, i.e. certain cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs), topoisomerase 1 enzyme (top 1) inhibitors, non-nucleoside antimetabolites, and estrogen receptor ligands are promising candidates. These drugs, at high doses are used for cancer therapy; at lower concentrations they exhibit anti-HIV activities in cultured cells. While the antiretroviral and the anticancer activities of the cdk inhibitor flavopiridol appear to be mutually exclusive and unrelated in cells and animal model(s) of HIV disease, the top 1 inhibitor 9-nitrocamptothecin, as well as the cdk-inhibitor roscovitine inhibit replication of HIV via selective sensitization of HIV-infected cells to apoptosis. In contrast, the inhibitory effects of these compounds are different from other cancer therapeutics that, at toxic concentrations, activate HIV either in cultured cells (such as certain ingenol and butyrate derivatives) and/or in patients (such as the widely used cyclophosmamide and cisplatin). This quality may lead to the eradication of proviral reservoirs, which is not accomplished by the currently available antiretroviral drugs. In this review, relevant available clinical and in vitro data that either support or discourage using certain anticancer drugs for treatment of HIV disease, and the rationales for developing novel antiretroviral drugs that may target infected cells rather than viral proteins are discussed.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Anticancer activity of the lanthanum compound [tris(1,10-phenanthroline)lanthanum(III)]trithiocyanate (KP772; FFC24).

Aim of this study was to investigate the anticancer properties of the new lanthanum compound [tris(1,10-phenanthroline)lanthanum(III)]trithiocyanate (KP772; FFC24). In vitro, growth inhibition by KP772 was comparable for >60 tumour cell models with IC50 values generally in the low microM range. KP772 induced tumour cell apoptosis indicated by chromatin condensation, caspase substrate cleavage and mitochondrial membrane depolarisation. DNA is unlikely to represent the primary molecular target of KP772, as no significant interaction or damage of DNA was detectable both in vitro and in living cells. Moreover, we found no evidence for induction of radical species. In contrast, KP772 potently inhibited DNA synthesis paralleled by a massive block of cell cycle in G0/G1 phase and a selective decrease of cyclin B1. Although treatment with KP772 induced expression of p53 and p21Waf1, transfection of wild-type p53 into knock-out cells only marginally enhanced the cytostatic activity of KP772. In vivo, the anticancer activity of KP772 against human DLD-1 colon carcinoma xenografts was comparable to that of cisplatin and methotrexate at doses not causing significant adverse effects. With regard to toxicity, the LD50 and no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAEL) of KP772 in Sprague-Dawley rats were 21.6 and 7.5 mg/kg, in outbred albino mice 62 and 10 mg/kg, respectively. In summary, KP772 exerts anticancer activity via potent induction of cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis and has promising in vivo anticancer activity against a human colon cancer xenograft. Together, these data suggest further development of KP772 as a new anticancer metal-drug.

Animals↗

Enhanced expression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 sensitizes the growth inhibitory effect of anticancer drugs in gastric cancer cells.

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and -II are potent mitogens and their mitogenic effects are modulated by IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs). In this study, we evaluated whether the enhanced expression of IGFBP-3 may increase the sensitivity of human gastric cancer cells to the anticancer drugs. We further investigated the potential mechanism for the growth inhibitory effect of anticancer drug induced-IGFBP-3 expression. These IGFBP-3-expressing gastric cancer cells showed a lower proliferation rate than IGFBP-3-non-expressing cells. Treatment with anticancer drugs resulted in up-regulation of IGFBP-3 expression in IGFBP-3-expressing cells. Interestingly the anticancer drug-induced-growth inhibition was more evident in IGFBP-3-expressing cells causing the IGFBP-3 expressing cells but not the IGFBP-3 non-expressing cells to accumulate in the G1/G0 phase and induce apoptosis. The exogenous addition of IGFBP-3 inhibited the growth of IGFBP-3-non-expressing cells, causing them to undergo apoptosis. Our data suggest that IGFBP-3 may have an important role in the biology of gastric cancer cell growth and provides a potential marker for predicting the responsiveness to anticancer drugs.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Structural studies of atom-specific anticancer drugs acting on DNA.

The interactions of many important anticancer drugs with DNA play important roles in their biological functions. In fact, DNA can be considered as a macromolecular receptor for those drugs. There are several classes of DNA-acting anticancer drugs. Some form noncovalent complexes with DNA by either intercalation (such as daunorubicin and doxorubicin) or groove-binding (such as distamycin A). Others, such as cisplatin, mitomycin C, and ecteinascidins, form covalent linkages with DNA. Finally, some (e.g., duocarmycin/CC-1065, bleomycin/pepleomycin, and enediyne antibiotics) cause DNA backbone cleavages. During the past decade, the detailed molecular interactions of several DNA-acting anticancer drugs with DNA have been studied with structural tools, including high resolution X-ray diffraction and NMR spectroscopy. These results have provided useful insights into DNA conformation and drug-DNA interactions. In particular, it was found that specific atomic sites on DNA are often the targets for drug covalent actions. Here we review the structural aspects of the interactions of several anticancer drugs acting on: (1) the N2 amino group of guanine in the minor groove, (2) the N3 atom of guanine and adenine in the minor groove, (3) the N7 atom of guanine and adenine in the major groove, and finally, (4) the C4', C5', and C1' atoms of the deoxyribose in the backbone of B-DNA double-helix. Understanding the underlying mechanism of the drug action at the cellular and molecular levels through those structural studies should be useful in the development of new anticancer drugs.

Adenine↗

The effects of anticancer drugs in combination with nimodipine and verapamil on cultured cells of glioblastoma multiforme.

The presence of the cellular multidrug resistance (MDR1) gene and its product, P-glycoprotein (Pgp), is thought to be a mechanism for the failure of chemotherapy in cancer patients. Calcium channel blockers have been shown to sensitise cancer cells to anticancer drugs by reversing Pgp expression in cell lines. The interactions between anticancer drugs such as carmustine (BCNU), vincristine (VCR) and procarbazine (PCB) and calcium channel blockers such as nimodipine and verapamil on cultured cells of glioblastoma from eight patients were therefore tested. Pgp expression was examined immunohistochemically using C219 monoclonal antibody in cytospin preparation. The cytotoxicity of the drugs was screened using microculture tetrazolium assay. The cells from five patients showed positive immunoreaction for Pgp. Nimodipine showed growth-inhibitory activity against glioblastoma cells at a rate of 16.55-26.88% (P < 0.05), but a similar effect was not observed with verapamil. While antiproliferative effects of BCNU were around 20.91-45.09% (P < 0.05) on the cells from seven patients, VCR was the most effective agent in inhibition of cell growth at a rate of 26.43-48.47% (P < 0.05). The response of the cells from five patients to PCB was from 11.98 to 16.32% (P < 0.05). When used together, nimodipine further enriched cytotoxicity of the anticancer drugs up to 11.14-40.85% (P < 0.05) without relation to Pgp expression. In conclusion, the enhancement of cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs by nimodipine suggests that there might be a synergy between anticancer drugs and nimodipine in the inhibition of glioma cell growth.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

Synthesis and enzyme-specific activation of carbohydrate-geldanamycin conjugates with potent anticancer activity.

Geldanamycin (GA) is a potent anticancer antibiotic that inhibits Hsp90. Its potential clinical utility is hampered by its severe toxicity. To alleviate this problem, we synthesized a series of carbohydrate-geldanamycin conjugates for enzyme-specific activation to increase tumor selectivity. The conjugation was carried out at the C-17-position of GA. Their anticancer activity was tested in a number of cancer cell lines. The enzyme-specific activation of these conjugates was evaluated with beta-galactosidase and beta-glucosidase. Evidently, glycosylation of C-17-position converted GA to an inactive prodrug before enzyme cleavage. Glucose-GA, as positive control, showed anticancer activity with IC(50) of 70.2-380.9 nM in various cancer cells by beta-glucosidase activation inside of the tumor cells, which was confirmed by 3-fold inhibition using beta-glucosidase specific inhibitor [2,5-dihydroxymethy-3,4-dihydroxypyrrolidine (DMDP)]. Compared to glucose-GA, galactose- and lactose-GA conjugates exhibited much less activity with IC(50) greater than 8000-25 000 nM. However, when galactose- and lactose-GA were incubated with beta-galactosidase in the cells, their anticancer activity was enhanced by 3- to 40-fold. The results suggest that GA can be inactivated by glycosylation of C-17-position and reactivated for anticancer activity by beta-galactosidase. Therefore, galactose-GA can be exploited in antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT) with beta-galactosidase for enzyme-specific activation in tumors to increase tumor selectivity.

Alkaloids↗

Polymorphisms of metabolizing enzymes and transporter proteins involved in the clearance of anticancer agents.

BACKGROUND: The efficacies and toxicities of anticancer agents vary greatly among patients. This is attributable to the activities of drug-metabolizing enzymes and membrane transporters, primarily determined by polymorphisms of the functions of genes encoding these proteins. DESIGN: We reviewed the available literature on drug-metabolizing enzymes and membrane transporters, especially their physiological functions, genetic and functional polymorphisms, and involvement in metabolism, pharmacokinetics and toxicity of anticancer agents. RESULTS: Nine enzymes metabolizing anticancer agents have been shown to have genetic polymorphisms: dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, cytochrome P450, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1, N-acetyltransferase 2, thiopurine methyltransferase, glutathione S-transferase, and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase. Decreased activities of these proteins can cause not only inherited metabolic disorders, but also extraordinarily severe toxicity in cancer patients given chemothearpy. Transporter proteins mediate cellular uptake and secretion of organic anions and cations. These proteins have recently been shown to play critical roles in the clearance of anticancer agents, although relations between patients' genetics backgrounds and the clinical significance of drug actions are poorly understood. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies should be focused on dosing and selection of anticancer agents, based on the type and extent of metabolic variation among individuals, in order to avoid adverse reactions and therapeutic failure.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Protein kinase Cdelta-dependent induction of manganese superoxide dismutase gene expression by microtubule-active anticancer drugs.

Bacterial lipopolysaccharide can induce manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) gene expression in a variety of cells. Paclitaxel (taxol) shares many properties of lipopolysaccharide. Here we report that paclitaxel can induce MnSOD gene expression in human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549 in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Additional anticancer drugs, vinblastine and vincristine, also induced MnSOD gene expression. We have shown previously (Das, K. C., and White, C. W. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14914-14920) that these drugs can activate protein kinase C (PKC). The PKC agonists thymeleatoxin (0.5 microM) and 12-deoxyphorbol 13-phenylacetate 20-acetate (dPPA; 10 nM) potently induced MnSOD gene expression. Calphostin C and GF109203X, both specific inhibitors of PKC, each inhibited MnSOD gene expression by anticancer agents. Down-regulation of PKC by prolonged treatment with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) also inhibited induction of MnSOD by anticancer drugs, indicating an important role of PKC in MnSOD signaling by these agents. Of 11 PKC isoenzymes, only PKCdelta translocated to the cell membrane after stimulation with anticancer drugs. By contrast, dPPA, PMA, and thymeleatoxin caused translocation of PKCalpha, betaI, delta, and mu isotypes. Anticancer drug-stimulated cells also had increased total PKC activity in membrane and cytosolic fractions. Thus, paclitaxel, vinblastine, and vincristine each specifically activate PKCdelta, whereas PMA, thymeleatoxin, and dPPA activate multiple isoenzymes. PKCdelta was the only isoform activated by each agent in both groups of compounds effective in MnSOD induction.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

Improvement of the therapeutic index of anticancer drugs by the superoxide dismutase mimic mangafodipir.

BACKGROUND: Anticancer drugs act by increasing intracellular hydrogen peroxide levels. Mangafodipir, a superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimic with catalase and glutathione reductase activities, protects normal cells from apoptosis induced by H2O2. We investigated its and other oxidative stress modulators' effects on anticancer drug activity in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: Cell lysis and intracellular reactive oxygen species levels were assessed in vitro in human leukocytes from healthy subjects and in murine CT26 colon cancer cells. Cells were exposed to the chemotherapeutic agents paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, or 5-fluorouracil, either in the presence or absence of mangafodipir and other oxidative stress modulators. Cell viability was evaluated by the methylthiazoletetrazolium assay. The effects of mangafodipir and other oxidative stress modulators on peripheral blood counts and on tumor growth were studied in BALB/c mice that were implanted with CT26 tumors and treated with 20 mg/kg paclitaxel. Survival of BALB/c mice infected with Staphylococcus aureus was also examined by treatment group. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: In vitro lysis of leukocytes exposed to paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, or 5-fluorouracil in combination with mangafodipir was decreased by 46% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 44% to 48%), 30.5% (95% CI = 29% to 32%), and 15% (95% CI = 10% to 20%), compared with lysis of cells treated with anticancer agent alone. Mangafodipir also statistically significantly enhanced in vitro anticancer drug cytotoxicity toward CT26 cancer cells. In vivo, mangafodipir protected mice against paclitaxel-induced leukopenia. Moreover, the survival rate of mice infected with S. aureus and treated with paclitaxel was higher when mangafodipir was also administered (survival: 3 of 17 versus 14 of 17, P < .001). In addition, mangafodipir amplified the inhibitory effect of paclitaxel on CT26 tumor growth in mice. CONCLUSIONS: Mangafodipir decreased hematotoxicity and enhanced cytotoxicity of anticancer agents.

Animals↗

Evidence of a novel antiapoptotic factor: role of inhibitor of differentiation or DNA binding (Id-1) in anticancer drug-induced apoptosis.

Id-1 (inhibitor of differentiation or DNA binding), a member of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family, is up-regulated in many types of human cancer and its expression levels are correlated with poor treatment outcome and shorter survival. In this study, we provided evidence to suggest that Id-1 is a universal survival factor that plays a key role in protection against anticancer drug-induced apoptosis. Using nine anticancer drugs and five cancer cell lines derived from nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CNE1), cervical carcinoma (HeLa), breast cancer (MCF7), hepatocarcinoma (Huh7) and prostate cancer (PC3), we found that down-regulation of Id-1 expression at both transcriptional and protein levels was associated with increased apoptosis rates and increased cleaved PARP after exposure to all anticancer agents. Treatment with a caspase 9 inhibitor, Z-LEHD-FMK, protected cancer cells from drug-induced PARP cleavage. However, overexpression of Id-1 in a p53 mutated cell line, CNE1, was able to suppress PARP cleavage in response to all anticancer drugs examined. In contrast, down-regulation of Id-1 through small RNA technology in CNE1 cells led to increased sensitivity to all six types of chemotherapeutic drugs. Our results demonstrate that Id-1 may be a general negative regulator of anticancer drug-induced apoptosis and suggest a novel therapeutic target in inducing chemosensitization in cancer cells. Our evidence also provides a possible underlying mechanism responsible for the positive role of Id-1 in the progression of human cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Novel Marine Compounds: Anticancer or Genotoxic?

In the past several decades, marine organisms have generously gifted to the pharmaceutical industries numerous naturally bioactive compounds with antiviral, antibacterial, antimalarial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer potentials. But till date only few anticancer drugs (cytarabine, vidarabine) have been commercially developed from marine compounds while several others are currently in different clinical trials. Majority of these compounds were tested in the tumor xenograft models, however, lack of anticancer potential data in the chemical- and/or oncogene-induced pre-initiation animal carcinogenesis models might have cost some of the marine anticancer compounds an early exit from the clinical trials. This review critically discusses importance of preclinical evaluation, failure of human clinical trials with certain potential anticancer agents, the screening tests used, and choice of biomarkers.

Journal Article↗

Telomerase inhibition enhances the response to anticancer drug treatment in human breast cancer cells.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women. Current therapies for breast tumors are based on the use of chemotherapeutic drugs that are quite toxic for the patients and often result in resistance. Telomerase is up-regulated in 95% of breast carcinomas but not in adjacent normal tissues. Therefore, it represents a very promising target for anticancer therapies. Unfortunately, the antiproliferative effects of telomerase inhibition require extensive telomere shortening before they are fully present. Combining telomerase inhibition with common chemotherapeutic drugs can be used to reduce this lag phase and induce tumor cell death more effectively. Few studies have analyzed the effects of telomerase inhibition in combination with anticancer drugs in breast cancer cells. In this study, we inhibited telomerase activity in two breast cancer cell lines using a dominant-negative human telomerase reverse transcriptase and analyzed cell viability after treatment with different anticancer compounds. We found that dominant-negative human telomerase reverse transcriptase efficiently inhibits telomerase activity and causes telomere shortening over time. Moreover, cells in which telomerase was suppressed were more sensitive to anticancer agents independently of their mechanism of action and this sensitization was dependent on the presence of shorter telomeres. Altogether, our data show that blocking telomere length maintenance in combination with anticancer drugs can be used as an effective way to induce death of breast cancer cells.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Anticancer effects of Ganoderma lucidum: a review of scientific evidence.

"Lingzhi" (Ganoderma lucidum), a popular medicinal mushroom, has been used in China for longevity and health promotion since ancient times. Investigations into the anticancer activity of lingzhi have been performed in both in vitro and in vivo studies, supporting its application for cancer treatment and prevention. The proposed anticancer activity of lingzhi has prompted its usage by cancer patients. It remains debatable as to whether lingzhi is a food supplement for health maintenance or actually a therapeutic "drug" for medical proposes. Thus far there has been no report of human trials using lingzhi as a direct anticancer agent, despite some evidence showing the usage of lingzhi as a potential supplement to cancer patients. Cellular immune responses and mitogenic reactivity of cancer patients have been enhanced by lingzhi, as reported in two randomized and one nonrandomized trials, and the quality of life of 65% of lung cancer patients improved in one study. The direct cytotoxic and anti-angiogenesis mechanisms of lingzhi have been established by in vitro studies; however, clinical studies should not be neglected to define the applicable dosage in vivo. At present, lingzhi is a health food supplement to support cancer patients, yet the evidence supporting the potential of direct in vivo anticancer effects should not be underestimated. Lingzhi or its products can be classified as an anticancer agent when current and more direct scientific evidence becomes available.

Animals↗

Differences in effects of oncogenes on sensitivity to anticancer drugs.

Methods to predict the responsiveness of a particular tumor to a particular anticancer drug are desirable not only for chemotherapy but also for chemoradiotherapy. Here, we examined the effects of viral or activated oncogenes on sensitivity to anticancer drugs by using SHOK (Syrian hamster Osaka-Kanazawa) cells and their transfectants. The IC50 of each transfectant was compared with that of the pSV2Neo transfected control. Cells transfected with the c-myc, v-mos, or v-fgr gene increased their sensitivity to bleomycin, while those transfected with the H-ras gene developed resistance. Resistance to cisplatin was conferred by the introduction of the H-ras or c-cot gene. In the case of adriamycin, the c-myc or c-cot transfectant increased sensitivity and the H-ras transfectant decreased it. Mitomycin C resistance was observed by the introduction of the K-ras gene. Thus, the H-ras gene was found to be involved in the development of resistance to three of the four anticancer drugs. In addition, we have for the first time shown that mos and cot have an effect on sensitivity to three and all of the four anticancer drugs, respectively. These results suggest that the expression of each oncogene would differently affect sensitivity to the four anticancer drugs used in this study, and this property could be a possible marker to predict chemosensitivity.

Animals↗

[Different effects of anticancer drugs on two human thyroid cell lines with different stages of differentiation].

We established two human thyroid tumor cell lines. One cell line (hPTC) was established from the tissue of a papillary thyroid carcinoma surgically excised from a 27-year-old female patient. The other cell line (hAG) was established from the tissue of an adenomatous goiter excised from a 59-year old female patient. Synthesis of cAMP by hPTC and hAG increased when they were stimulated by TSH. hPTC and hAG continued to divide as a monolayer in a tissue culture for three years and two years, respectively. We assessed the efficacy of anticancer drugs (doxorubicin:ADR, cisplatin:CDDP, nimustine:ACNU, bleomycin:BLM, cyclophosphamide:CPA, aclarubicin:ACR) with resard to hPTC. The hPTC cells were cultured in 24-well plates in the presence of the anticancer drugs for 48 hours, and the cellular DNA of the live cells was measured with diaminobenzoic acid. ADR had the lowest ED50 (0.029 mu g/ml) and the clinical blood concentration was 13.8 times that of the ED50. The clinical blood concentration divided by ED50 for the other anticancer drugs are, in order of higher values, 2.3 for CPA, 1.7 for BLM, 1.2 for CDDP, 0.5 for ACR, and less than 0.1 for ACNU. ADR showed time-independent effects since a 2-hour exposure of ADR to the hPTC cells resulted in the significant reduction of the cellular DNA content of the live cells even after 48 hours. The effects of the other anticancer drugs were time-dependent. We then studied the difference of the effects of ADR on hPTC and hAG. ED50 for hPTC was significantly low (0.035 mu g/ml) compared to that for hAG (0.460 mu g/ml). Since free radical formation is one of the major anticancer mechanisms of ADR the effects of free radicals on ED50's for hPTC and hAG were measured by adding glutathione (GSH), N-acetylcystein (NAC), buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), and alpha-tocopherol (alpha-toco) into the culture media. GSH catches up with free radicals in the extracellular fluid. NAC promotes production of GSH in the cytoplasm, but BSO interferes with the production of GSH in the cytoplasm. alpha-toco catches up with free radicals on the plasma membrane. GSH and alpha-toco did not effect ED50 for hPTC and hAG. However, NAC increased ED50 for hPTC and hAG, and BSO reduced ED50 for hPTC and hAG. The effects of NAC and BSO on ED50 for hPTC were greater than those for hAG.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adenoma↗

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with anticancer drugs.

Drug dosage is of paramount importance in the treatment of cancer, the aim being to optimise drug exposure with a view to maximising antitumour effect and minimising normal tissue toxicity. Pharmacokinetic parameters of anticancer drugs vary considerably from patient to patient. Most clinically useful drug regimens consist of a cocktail of drugs with different mechanisms of action and hence different toxicity profiles. Therefore, it is even more difficult to optimise drug dosage for individual patients. Variability in the pharmacokinetic profile of anticancer agents in individual patients can be further complicated by pharmacokinetically based drug interactions between different anticancer drugs or anticancer drugs and other concomitant medication. Most of the reported studies provide useful information and identify major interactions, but many also demonstrate the difficulty in identifying therapeutically important drug interactions in patients. Even with all the problems associated with acquiring suitable data from cancer patients it is clear that drug interactions do occur and that these can be clinically significant. It is important that potential interactions are identified early in the drug development of new anticancer drugs. This may be made possible by the rapid improvements in analytical techniques and the availability of more appropriate clinically relevant model systems. Therefore, the therapeutic significance of any detected interactions may be assessed, and steps to avoid them may be established, before the drug is under clinical investigation.

Antineoplastic Agents↗