PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “budding”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Localization of serotonin in taste buds: a comparative study in four vertebrates.

To investigate monoaminergic synaptic mechanisms in taste buds, we examined taste buds of mice, rats, rabbits, and mudpuppies for the presence of the neurotransmitter candidate, serotonin. Immunocytochemistry revealed serotonin-like immunostaining in cells in mammalian taste buds and Merkel-like basal cells in taste buds of mudpuppies. In untreated mudpuppies and in mammals injected with the precursor to serotonin, L-tryptophan, certain taste cells showed serotonin-like immunoreactivity, although in mammalian taste buds the immunostaining was relatively weak. After pretreating mammals with 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP), the intermediate precursor between L-tryptophan and serotonin, several taste cells showed strong immunoreactivity for serotonin. These findings indicate that mammalian taste cells normally contain serotonin and that taste cells can take up 5-HTP and convert it to serotonin. Immunocytochemistry on wholemount preparations demonstrated that serotonergic cells of mudpuppies (i.e., Merkel-like basal cells) were disposed in a ring at the periphery of taste buds. Similarly, serotonergic cells in mammalian taste buds tended to be located at the periphery of taste buds. Based on the position of serotonergic cells in the taste bud and on recent physiological studies on the actions of serotonin in taste buds, we postulate that serotonin functions as a neuromodulator or neurotransmitter in vertebrate taste buds.

Animals↗

The effects of sialoadenectomy and exogenous EGF on taste bud morphology and maintenance.

Taste buds on the dorsal tongue surface are continually bathed in saliva rich in epidermal growth factor (EGF). In the following experiment, taste bud number and morphology were monitored following submandibular and sublingual salivary gland removal (sialoadenectomy), to determine if EGF plays a role in the maintenance and formation of taste buds. Adult male rats were divided into four groups: sialoadenectomized (SX, n = 4); sialoadenectomized with EGF replacement (SX + EGF, n = 5); sham-operated (SH, n = 4); and sham-operated with exogenous EGF (SH + EGF, n = 5). After a 3 week recovery, SX + EGF and SH + EGF animals were given 50 microg/day EGF in their drinking water for 14 days. At day 14, saliva was collected, the animals were killed and the presence of EGF determined by radioligand-binding assay. Tongues were removed and histologically examined for the presence and morphology of taste buds on fungiform and circumvallate papillae, or immunostained for the presence of EGF, TGFalpha (transforming growth factor alpha) and EGFR (EGF receptor). The removal of submandibular and sublingual salivary glands resulted in the loss of fungiform taste buds and normal fungiform papillae morphology. These effects were reversed by EGF supplementation, indicating a role for EGF in fungiform taste bud maintenance. In addition, supplementation of EGF to sham-operated animals increased the size of fungiform taste buds. In contrast, removal of salivary glands had no effect on the size, numbers, or morphology of circumvallate taste buds, suggesting that the formation and maintenance of taste buds in fungiform and circumvallate papillae may involve different and distinct processes. EGF, TGFalpha and EGFR were localized to distinct layers of the dorsal epithelium and to within both fungiform and circumvallate taste buds. Their expression within the epithelium or taste buds was not altered with sialoadenectomy, indicating that the actions of endogenous EGF and TGFalpha are distinct and not regulated by exogenous EGF and TGFalpha supplied in saliva.

Animals↗

The role of innervation in the development of taste buds: insights from studies of amphibian embryos.

Amphibian embryos have long been model organisms for studies of development because of their hardiness and large size, as well as the ease with which they can be experimentally manipulated. These particular advantages have allowed us recently to test the role of innervation in the development of vertebrate taste buds using embryos of an aquatic salamander, the axolotl. The predominant model of taste bud genesis has been one of neural induction, in which ingrowing sensory neurites induce taste bud differentiation in the epithelium that lines the mouth and pharynx. However, when we prevented embryonic sensory neurons from contacting the oropharyngeal epithelium by using transplantation or tissue culture techniques, we found that taste bud differentiation was independent of nerve contact. Additionally, using similar types of experimental manipulations, we have recently shown that taste bud differentiation is not a result of interactions of the oropharyngeal epithelium with craniofacial mesenchyme. Surprisingly, we found that although taste bud genesis occurs very late in embryonic development, it is an intrinsic feature of the presumptive oropharyngeal epithelium extremely early, in fact as early as the completion of gastrulation. These data have prompted us to propose a new model for the development of amphibian taste buds: (i) The presumptive oropharyngeal epithelium is specified by the time gastrulation is complete; (ii) Subsequently, a distributed population of taste bud progenitors is set up within this epithelium via local cell-cell interactions. These progenitor cells give rise to taste buds, which are distributed throughout the mouth and pharynx. How widely applicable this model might be for the genesis of taste buds in other vertebrates remains to be seen. However, since it is likely that the taste system of axolotls more closely resembles the ancestral state from which both the amphibian and mammalian taste systems have evolved, it is possible that many of the same developmental mechanisms that give rise to amphibian taste buds are also used to generate the receptor organs in mammals.

Ambystoma↗

Quantitative relationships between taste bud development and gustatory ganglion cells.

To determine whether patterns of taste bud innervation change during postnatal rat development, the number of geniculate ganglion cells that innervate single taste buds were quantified in adult and developing rats. While there was a large variation in numbers of ganglion cells that innervate individual taste buds, there was a high degree of organization in the system. Namely, the number of labeled geniculate ganglion cells innervating a taste bud was highly correlated with the size of the taste bud. This relationship between taste bud size and number of innervating ganglion cells develops over a prolonged postnatal period and is not established until postnatal day 40 (P40), when taste buds reach their adult size. In a second series of experiments, we sought to determine whether neural rearrangement of chorda tympani neurons is responsible for the development of this relationship by double-labeling single taste buds at different ages. We found that the number of ganglion cells innervating individual taste buds on P10 predicts the size that taste buds become by P40. This finding suggests that neural rearrangement is not responsible for establishing the relationship between taste bud size and the number of innervating ganglion cells during development. More importantly, it strongly suggests that the 'neural template' for the mature innervation pattern is determined during early postnatal development.

Animals↗

Taste buds: development and evolution.

The gustatory system in vertebrates comprises peripheral receptors (taste buds), innervated by three cranial nerves (VII, IX, and X), and a series of central neural centers and pathways. All vertebrates, with the exception of hagfishes, have taste buds. These receptors vary morphologically in different vertebrates but usually consist of at least four types of cells (dark, light, basal, and stem cells). An out-group analysis indicates that taste buds were restricted to the oropharynx, primitively, and that external taste buds, distributed over the head and, in some cases, even the trunk, evolved a number of times independently. The sensory neurons of the cranial nerves that innervate taste buds are believed to arise from epibranchial placodes, which are induced by pharyngeal endoderm, but it has never been demonstrated experimentally that these sensory neurons do, in fact, arise from these placodes. Although many details of the development of the innervation of taste buds are still unknown, it is now clear that taste buds are induced from either ecto- or endodermal epithelia, rather than arising from either placodes or neural crest. At present, there are two developmental models of taste bud induction: The neural induction model claims that peripheral nerve fibers induce taste buds, whereas the early specification model claims that oropharyngeal epithelium is specified by or during gastrulation and that taste buds arise from cell-cell interactions within the specified epithelium. There is now substantial evidence that the early specification model best describes the induction of taste buds.

Animals↗

Differential response of Shh expression between chick forelimb and hindlimb buds by FGF-4.

The interactions of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) play important roles in vertebrate limb pattern formation. In the posterior region of the chick limb bud, Shh and FGF-4 each maintain expression in a positive feedback loop. In the anterior region, Shh can also induce Fgf-4 expression in the anterior apical ectodermal ridge. However, the possibility of Shh induction by FGF protein is unclear. Because many experiments to analyze gene expression have been carried out by using the forelimb bud of the chick embryo, we investigated gene expression of the cells in the anterior region of the chick hindlimb bud after FGF-4 application and compared the results with those for the forelimb bud. When an FGF-4-containing bead was implanted into the anterior region of a stage 20 hindlimb bud, ectopic expression of Shh was induced in the mesenchyme beneath the anterior end of the apical ectodermal ridge at 36 hr after implantation. Subsequent to Shh activation, Hoxd13 was also observed in the anterior-distal region of the limb bud. Furthermore, FGF-4 implantation to the hindlimb bud caused additional digit formation accompanying respecification of positional value in the anterior tissue. Ectopic Shh was induced in cells located distal to the FGF-4 bead, and the cells of the flank region did not contribute to ectopic Shh induction. On the other hand, no ectopic Shh and Hoxd13 expression was detected by grafting an FGF-4 bead into the forelimb bud. Although FGF-4 implantation to the forelimb bud occasionally induced extra digit 2 formation, no embryos had an extra digit 3 or digit 4, and many specimens exhibited normal skeletal pattern. These results demonstrate the difference between the fore- and hindlimb buds in the cell competence of Shh induction in response to FGF-4, suggesting the possibility that the responsiveness of mesenchymal cells in signaling molecules is not the same in the fore- and hindlimb buds.

Animals↗

Lectin teratogenesis. II: Demonstration of increased binding of concanavalin A to limb buds of rabbit embryos during the teratogenically sensitive period.

The plant lectin concanavalin A (con A) causes malformations of rabbit embryos when 160 micrograms (in 40 microliter) are injected into the exocoelom on gestational days 12-15 but does not cause malformations on days 10-11. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mechanism for increased susceptibility of day 12-15 embryos to con A teratogenicity. Light microscopy of day 11 embryos 15-20 hr after treatment with con A revealed no observable difference from controls. Day 13 embryos at similar times exhibited limb buds with large areas that were denuded of ectoderm. Concurrent addition of alpha-methyl-D-mannoside (alpha MM), a specific inhibitor of con A, to the injection solution of day 13 embryos resulted in limb buds that appeared normal. The regions of con A binding to day 11 and day 13 embryos were visualized through epifluorescent microscopy of untreated embryos stained with fluorescein-labelled con A. Day 11 embryos exhibited moderate fluorescence on the surface of limb buds and the pericardial region. Day 13 embryos exhibited strong fluorescence of limb bud surfaces; the pericardial region remained moderately fluorescent. Addition of alpha MM to the incubation medium resulted in no fluorescence above background. Visualization of con A receptors was accomplished by ultrastructural analysis of forelimb buds stained with ferritin-labelled con A. Ferritin label was observed only on the surfaces of the ectoderm and was sparse over all regions of day 11 limb buds. In contrast, ferritin label was moderately heavy in all regions of the day 13 limb buds. No labelling occurred when the ferritin-labelled con A was preincubated with alpha MM. These observations indicate that the number of exposed con A receptors on limb buds of teratogenically sensitive embryos (day 13) is increased, compared with the number of exposed receptors on limb buds of younger, insensitive (day 11) embryos. The increased number of exposed con A receptors on limb buds during the teratogenically sensitive period provides not only increased binding of the lectin to sensitive embryos but also a potential mechanism for the anomalous attachment of distal regions of the limb buds to the body wall.

Animals↗

Pathogenetic changes in the lung bud of mutant rats with heritable pulmonary lobation anomalies.

The present study aimed at investigating pathogenesis of pulmonary lobation anomalies in fpl/fpl mutant rats. Day 12-15 embryos were first examined for pulmonary lobation. Lung serial sections were then made and examined for bronchial branching and distribution of extracellular matrices (ECMs). The lung buds of both fpl/fpl embryos and their phenotypically normal fpl/+ littermates were formed as bilateral protrusion of the foregut on gestation day 12. In fpl/+ embryos, three processes appeared on the right lung bud on day 13, and fissures were completely formed by day 14. In fpl/fpl embryos, the right lung bud had no clear process on gestation day 13, and fissures were not formed on day 14 and thereafter, with the exception of incomplete separation between the cranial and middle lobes. Histological observation revealed that the right main bronchial bud of fpl/+ embryos ramified all lobar bronchial buds by gestation day 13. ECMs, a borderline between endodermal bronchial buds and surrounding mesenchyme, disappeared at the distal end of each lobar bronchial bud. By contrast, in fpl/fpl embryos, the right main bronchial bud did not ramify the middle and intermediate lobar bronchial buds at its lateral and ventral portions, but swelled on gestation day 13. It was covered with ECMs at the lateral side but not at the ventral region, from which the middle and intermediate lobar bronchial buds arose on gestation day 14. These observations suggest that altered distribution of ECMs causes branching abnormalities of the lobar bronchial buds and subsequent lobation anomalies in fpl/fpl embryos.

Animals↗

Budding as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis is an important indicator of tumor stage and prognosis in pT1 and pT2 colorectal adenocarcinomas. Lymphovascular invasion is an established risk factor of lymph node metastasis, whereas budding at the invasive front of tumors is also reported to correlate with lymph node metastasis. We examined whether the coexistence of lymphovascular invasion and budding provides any better information than lymphovascular invasion alone in the prediction of lymph node metastasis of pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Surgically resected specimens of 101 pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas were studied. Using sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin, we examined lymphovascular invasion and budding according to Morodomi's definition. RESULTS: Lymphovascular invasion was present in 39 lesions (38 percent), whereas budding was found in 42 lesions (41 percent). Budding was more frequently detected in pT2 tumors than in pT1 tumors. The presence of budding significantly correlated with lymphovascular invasion. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of lymphovascular invasion alone for lymph node metastasis were 79, 76, 34, and 96 percent, respectively, whereas those of the combination of lymphovascular invasion and budding (either lymphovascular invasion or budding) were 93, 52, 24, and 98 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: Because the risk of lymph node metastasis in pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas having neither lymph node metastasis nor budding is very low, budding in combination with lymphovascular invasion seems to be a simple and inexpensive pathologic marker in predicting lymph node metastasis. Therefore, the presence or absence of budding should be examined in the routine pathologic diagnosis of pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Aryl hydrocarbon receptors in urogenital sinus mesenchyme mediate the inhibition of prostatic epithelial bud formation by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

In utero exposure of male C57BL/6 mice to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) prevents prostatic epithelial buds from forming in the ventral region of the urogenital sinus (UGS) and reduces the number of buds that form in the dorsolateral region. This inhibition of budding is aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) dependent and appears to be the primary cause of lobe-specific prostate abnormalities in TCDD-exposed mice. TCDD can inhibit prostatic epithelial bud formation by acting directly on the UGS in vitro, but whether it does so via AHR in UGS mesenchyme, epithelium, or both was unknown. To address this issue, UGS mesenchyme and epithelium from gestation day (GD) 15 wild-type C57BL/6J male mice were isolated, recombined, and cultured in vitro for 5 days with 10(-8) M 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and either 10(-9) M TCDD or vehicle. Prostatic epithelial buds were viewed by light microscopy after removal of mesenchyme. Effects depended greatly on which portions of the mesenchyme were used: TCDD had little if any effect when whole UGS epithelium (UGE) was recombined with ventral plus dorsolateral mesenchyme, tended to reduce bud numbers in recombinants made with UGE and dorsolateral mesenchyme, and severely reduced bud numbers in recombinants made with UGE and ventral mesenchyme (VM). [VM + UGE] recombinants prepared from wild-type and AHR knockout (Ahr(-/-)) mice were then cultured with DHT to determine the site of action of TCDD. AHR null mutation alone had no effect on budding. TCDD severely inhibited prostatic epithelial bud formation in recombinants that contained mesenchymal AHR, whereas bud formation was not inhibited by TCDD in recombinants lacking mesenchymal AHR, regardless of epithelial AHR status. These results demonstrate that UGS mesenchyme and not UGS epithelium is the site of action of TCDD. Therefore, the initial events responsible for abnormal UGS (and ultimately prostate) development occur within the UGS mesenchyme, and changes in gene expression in the UGS epithelium responsible for inhibited prostatic budding are secondary to the direct effects of TCDD on UGS mesenchyme.

Animals↗

Activin A is an endogenous inhibitor of ureteric bud outgrowth from the Wolffian duct.

Development of metanephric kidney begins with ureteric bud outgrowth from the Wolffian duct (WD). GDNF is believed to be a crucial positive signal in the budding process, but the negative regulation of this process remains unclear. Here, we examined the role of activin A, a member of TGF-beta family, in bud formation using an in vitro WD culture system. When cultured with the surrounding mesonephros, WDs formed many ectopic buds in response to GDNF. While the activin signaling pathway is normally active along the non-budding WD (as measured by expression of activin A and phospho-Smad2/3), activin A was absent and phospho-Smad2/3 was undetectable in the ectopic buds induced by GDNF. To examine the role of activin A in bud formation, we attempted to inactivate activin action. Interestingly, the addition of neutralizing anti-activin A antibody potentiated GDNF action. To further clarify the role of activin A, we also tested the effect of activin blockade on the WD cultured in the absence of mesonephros. WDs without mesonephros did not form ectopic buds even in the presence of GDNF. In contrast, blockade of activin action with a variety of agents acting through different mechanisms (natural antagonist, neutralizing antibodies, siRNA) enabled GDNF to induce ectopic buds. Inhibition of GDNF-induced bud formation by activin A was accompanied by inhibition of cell proliferation, reduced expression of Pax-2, and decreased phosphorylation of PI3-kinase and MAP kinase in the WD. Our data suggest that activin A is an endogenous inhibitor of bud formation and that cancellation of activin A autocrine action may be critical for the initiation of this process.

Activins↗

Bud10p directs axial cell polarization in budding yeast and resembles a transmembrane receptor.

BACKGROUND: The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae can bud in two spatially programmed patterns: axial or bipolar. In the axial budding pattern, cells polarize and divide adjacent to the previous site of cell separation, in response to a cell-division remnant, which includes Bud3p, Bud4p and septin proteins. This paper investigates the role of an additional component of the cell-division remnant, Bud10p, in axial budding. RESULTS: The sequence of Bud10p predicts a protein that contains a single trans-membrane domain but lacks similarity to known proteins. Subcellular fractionations confirm that Bud10p is associated with membranes. Bud10p accumulates as a patch at the bud site prior to bud formation, and then persists at the mother-bud neck as the bud grows. Towards the end of the cell cycle, the localization of Bud10p refines to a tight double ring which splits at cytokinesis into two single rings, one in each progeny cell. Each single ring remains until a new concentration of Bud10p forms at the developing axial bud site, immediately adjacent to the old ring. Certain aspects of Bud10p localization are dependent upon BUD3, suggesting a close functional interaction between Bud10p and Bud3p. CONCLUSIONS: Bud10p is the first example of a transmembrane protein that controls cell polarization during budding. Because Bud10p contains a large extracellular domain, it is possible that Bud10p functions in a manner analogous to an extracellular matrix receptor. Clusters of Bud10p at the mother-bud neck formed in response to Bud3p (and possibly to an extracellular cue, such as a component of the cell wall), might facilitate the docking of downstream components that direct polarization of the cytoskeleton.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Budding from Golgi membranes requires the coatomer complex of non-clathrin coat proteins.

Do the coats on vesicles budded from the Golgi apparatus actually cause the budding, or do they simply coat buds (Fig. 1)? One view (the membrane-mediated budding hypothesis) is that budding is an intrinsic property of Golgi membranes not requiring extrinsic coat proteins. Assembly of coats from dispersed subunits is super-imposed upon the intrinsic budding process and is proposed to convert the tips of tubules into vesicles. The alternative view (the coat-mediated budding hypothesis) is that coat formation provides the essential driving force for budding. The membrane-mediated budding hypothesis was inspired by the microtubule-dependent extension of apparently uncoated, 90-nm-diameter membrane tubules from the Golgi apparatus and other organelles in vivo after treatment with brefeldin A, a drug that inhibits the assembly of coat proteins onto Golgi membranes. This hypothesis predicts that tubules will be extended when coat proteins are unavailable to convert tubule-derived membrane into vesicles. Here we use a cell-free system in which coated vesicles are formed from Golgi cisternae to show that, on the contrary, when budding diminishes as a result of immunodepletion of coat protein pools, tubules are not formed at the expense of vesicles. We conclude that coat proteins are required for budding from Golgi membranes.

ADP-Ribosylation Factors↗

Actin cable dynamics in budding yeast.

Actin cables, bundles of actin filaments that align along the long axis of budding yeast, are crucial for establishment of cell polarity. We fused green fluorescent protein (GFP) to actin binding protein 140 (Abp140p) and visualized actin cable dynamics in living yeast. We detected two populations of actin cables: (i) bud-associated cables, which extend from the bud along the mother-bud axis, and (ii) randomly oriented cables, which are relatively short. Time-lapse imaging of Abp140p-GFP revealed an apparent increase in the length of bud-associated actin cables. Analysis of movement of Abp140p-GFP fiduciary marks on bud-associated cables and fluorescence loss in photobleaching experiments revealed that this apparent elongation occurs by assembly of new material at the end of the cable within the bud and movement of the opposite end of the cable toward the tip of the mother cell distal to the bud. The rate of extension of the tip of an elongating actin cable is 0.29 +/- 0.08 microm/s. Latrunculin A (Lat-A) treatment completely blocked this process. We also observed movement of randomly oriented cables around the cortex of cells at a rate of 0.59 +/- 0.14 microm/s. Mild treatment with Lat-A did not affect the velocity of movement of randomly oriented cables. However, Lat-A treatment did increase the number of randomly oriented, motile cables per cell. Our observations suggest that establishment of bud-associated actin cables during the cell cycle is accomplished not by realignment of existing cables but by assembly of new cables within the bud or bud neck, followed by elongation.

Actins↗

Visualization of retrovirus budding with correlated light and electron microscopy.

We have used correlated scanning EM (SEM) and multiphoton fluorescence microscopy to visualize budding of virus-like particles (VLPs) of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) and HIV type 1 (HIV-1). When the Gag structural protein was expressed alone as a GFP fusion, most budding particles appeared morphologically aberrant, but normal assembly could be rescued by coexpression of untagged Gag protein. Imaging of live cells allowed budding to be seen in real time as the disappearance of fluorescent spots from the dorsal cell surface. The disappearance of very bright spots containing clusters of VLPs often occurred in a stepwise fashion. Even after imaging times >1 h, only a minority of the spots disappeared, suggesting that some might be budding-incompetent complexes. On individual cells, we enumerated both the fluorescent puncta and the budding structures visible by SEM and compared these numbers for WT Gag proteins and for Gag proteins that were blocked at the last step in budding by a late domain mutation. For the mutant HIV-1 and RSV proteins, almost all of the fluorescent spots corresponded to budding structures. For WT RSV, the dorsal side of cells showed 3-fold more fluorescent spots than budding structures, suggesting that formation of the polymerized Gag shell precedes bulging out of the membrane. For WT HIV-1, most fluorescent spots corresponded with budding structures, consistent with the slower budding rate of this virus. Combining these two types of microscopy will allow innovative approaches for elucidating the mechanism of retrovirus budding.

Animals↗

Microtubules and actin cytoskeleton in Cryptococcus neoformans compared with ascomycetous budding and fission yeasts.

Actin cytoskeleton and microtubules were studied in a human fungal pathogen, the basidiomycetous yeast Cryptococcus neoformans (haploid phase of Filobasidiella neoformans), during its asexual reproduction by budding using fluorescence and electron microscopy. Staining with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin revealed an F-actin cytoskeleton consisting of cortical patches, cables and cytokinetic ring. F-actin patches accumulated at the regions of cell wall growth, i. e. in sterigma, bud and septum. In mother cells evenly distributed F-actin patches were joined to F-actin cables, which were directed to the growing sterigma and bud. Some F-actin cables were associated with the cell nucleus. The F-actin cytokinetic ring was located in the bud neck, where the septum originated. Antitubulin TAT1 antibody revealed a microtubular cytoskeleton consisting of cytoplasmic and spindle microtubules. In interphase cells cytoplasmic microtubules pointed to the growing sterigma and bud. As the nucleus was translocated to the bud for mitosis, the cytoplasmic microtubules disassembled and were replaced by a short intranuclear spindle. Astral microtubules then emanated from the spindle poles. Elongation of the mitotic spindle from bud to mother cell preceded nuclear division, followed by cytokinesis (septum formation in the bud neck). Electron microscopy of ultrathin sections of chemically fixed and freeze-substituted cells revealed filamentous bundles directed to the cell cortex. The bundles corresponded in width to the actin microfilament cables. At the bud neck numerous ribosomes accumulated before septum synthesis. We conclude: (i) the topology of F-actin patches, cables and rings in C. neoformans resembles ascomycetous budding yeast Saccharomyces, while the arrangement of interphase and mitotic microtubules resembles ascomycetous fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces. The organization of the cytoskeleton of the mitotic nucleus, however, is characteristic of basidiomycetous yeasts. (ii) A specific feature of C. neoformans was the formation of a cylindrical sterigma, characterized by invasion of F-actin cables and microtubules, followed by accumulation of F-actin patches around its terminal region resulting in development of an isodiametrical bud.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Cellular morphogenesis in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle: localization of the CDC3 gene product and the timing of events at the budding site.

Budding cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae possess a ring of 10-nm-diameter filaments, of unknown biochemical nature, that lies just inside the plasma membrane in the neck connecting the mother cell to its bud. Electron microscopic observations suggest that these filaments assemble at the budding site coincident with bud emergence and disassemble shortly before cytokinesis (Byers, B. and L. Goetsch. 1976. J. Cell Biol. 69:717-721). Mutants defective in any of four genes (CDC3, CDC10, CDC11, or CDC12) lack these filaments and display a pleiotropic phenotype that involves abnormal bud growth and an inability to complete cytokinesis. We showed previously by immunofluorescence that the CDC12 gene product is probably a constituent of the ring of 10-nm filaments (Haarer, B. and J. Pringle. 1987. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:3678-3687). We now report the use of fusion proteins to generate polyclonal antibodies specific for the CDC3 gene product. In immunofluorescence experiments, these antibodies decorated the neck regions of wild-type and mutant cells in patterns suggesting that the CDC3 gene product is also a constituent of the ring of 10-nm filaments. We also used the CDC3-specific and CDC12-specific antibodies to investigate the timing of localization of these proteins to the budding site. The results suggest that the CDC3 protein is organized into a ring at the budding site well before bud emergence and remains so organized for some time after cytokinesis. The CDC12 product appears to behave similarly, but may arrive at the budding site closer to the time of bud emergence, and disappear from that site more quickly after cytokinesis, than does the CDC3 product. Examination of mating cells and cells responding to purified mating pheromone revealed novel arrangements of the CDC3 and CDC12 products in the regions of cell wall reorganization. Both proteins were present in normal-looking ring structures at the bases of the first zygotic buds.

Antibodies, Fungal↗

Role of Bud3p in producing the axial budding pattern of yeast.

Yeast cells can select bud sites in either of two distinct spatial patterns. a cells and alpha cells typically bud in an axial pattern, in which both mother and daughter cells form new buds adjacent to the preceding division site. In contrast, a/alpha cells typically bud in a bipolar pattern, in which new buds can form at either pole of the cell. The BUD3 gene is specifically required for the axial pattern of budding: mutations of BUD3 (including a deletion) affect the axial pattern but not the bipolar pattern. The sequence of BUD3 predicts a product (Bud3p) of 1635 amino acids with no strong or instructive similarities to previously known proteins. However, immunofluorescence localization of Bud3p has revealed that it assembles in an apparent double ring encircling the mother-bud neck shortly after the mitotic spindle forms. The Bud3p structure at the neck persists until cytokinesis, when it splits to yield a single ring of Bud3p marking the division site on each of the two progeny cells. These single rings remain for much of the ensuing unbudded phase and then disassemble. The Bud3p rings are indistinguishable from those of the neck filament-associated proteins (Cdc3p, Cdc10p, Cdc11p, and Cdc12p), except that the latter proteins assemble before bud emergence and remain in place for the duration of the cell cycle. Upon shift of a temperature-sensitive cdc12 mutant to restrictive temperature, localization of both Bud3p and the neck filament-associated proteins is rapidly lost. In addition, a haploid cdc11 mutant loses its axial-budding pattern upon shift to restrictive temperature. Taken together, the data suggest that Bud3p and the neck filaments are linked in a cycle in which each controls the position of the other's assembly: Bud3p assembles onto the neck filaments in one cell cycle to mark the site for axial budding (including assembly of the new ring of neck filaments) in the next cell cycle. As the expression and localization of Bud3p are similar in a, alpha, and a/alpha cells, additional regulation must exist such that Bud3p restricts the position of bud formation in a and alpha cells but not in a/alpha cells.

Amino Acid Sequence↗