SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “multidisciplinary”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Primary follow-up care in a multidisciplinary setting enhances catch-up growth of very-low-birth-weight infants.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of multidisciplinary primary care follow-up, which included the services of a registered dietitian, on growth outcomes of very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants. DESIGN: Data were obtained retrospectively from medical records. Forty-two infants receiving follow-up care on an as needed basis from the general pediatric clinic were compared with 33 infants receiving multidisciplinary follow-up care that included routine nutrition intervention from the comprehensive care clinic. Comparisons were made in weight, length, and head circumference measurements; growth rates; and catch-up growth (defined as > or = 5th percentile on growth charts of the National Center for Health Statistics attained by 12 months growth-corrected age). SUBJECTS: VLBW infants (< or = 1,500 g at birth) were selected from both follow-up groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Chi 2 Analysis compared the proportions of infants in each group who achieved catch-up growth. Unpaired t tests compared group means in weight, length, and head circumference measurements and growth rates. RESULTS: The two groups differed significantly in the number of infants exhibiting catch-up growth for length and head circumference. At 8 months growth-corrected age, 7 (28%) of the general pediatric clinic infants were at the 5th percentile or greater for length compared with 21 (64%) of the comprehensive care clinic infants (P < .01); 15 (60%) of the general pediatric clinic group and 30 (91%) of the comprehensive care clinic group were at the 5th percentile or greater for head circumference (P < .05). At 12 months growth-corrected age, 12 (57%) of the general pediatric clinic infants and 26 (87%) of the comprehensive care clinic infants were at the 5th percentile or greater for length (P < .05); 11 (52%) of the general pediatric clinic infants and 27 (90%) of the comprehensive care clinic infants were at the 5th percentile or greater for head circumference (P < .05). APPLICATIONS: Multidisciplinary primary care follow-up that includes the services of a registered dietitian for nutrition intervention can enhance the catch-up growth of VLBW infants through 12 months growth-corrected age.

Comprehensive Health Care↗

PubMed2001

Giant bronchial carcinoid tumors: a multidisciplinary approach.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial carcinoid tumors account for approximately 2% of all lung tumors. Although they were considered benign lesions, they are now categorized malignant, occasionally with poor prognosis. The clinical symptoms can be highly variable and are often present for many years before diagnosis. Whereas some carcinoids are entirely asymptomatic, others are accompanied by carcinoid or paraneoplastic syndromes. METHODS: We describe the multidisciplinary management of a 34-year-old female patient with a massive actively secreting bronchial carcinoid tumor of the right lung. Furthermore, we provide a review of the literature regarding the operative treatment and the perioperative management of pulmonary carcinoid tumors with respect to surgical, anesthetic, radiologic, and pathologic considerations. RESULTS: In the reported case, the first symptoms were chronic watery diarrhea, skin flushing, progressive shortness of breath, and increasing right shoulder pain. When the patient initially presented at our institution, the tumor had already reached an enormous size and it involved the right and left atrium as well as the atrial septum. Using an evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach the patient was treated successfully with extended surgical resection. CONCLUSIONS: Carcinoid tumors are potentially curable even if they reach a significant size and thus an aggressive strategy is warranted. The management of such cases requires careful investigation, planning, and treatment with collaborative expertise provided by a multidisciplinary team. We demonstrated that this approach can lead to a favorable outcome in what first appeared to be a formidable and unresectable tumor.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Outpatient planning for persons with physical disabilities: a randomized prospective trial of physiatrist alone versus a multidisciplinary team.

The purposes of this study were to assess the effect of adding a physiatrist to the usual community management of persons with complex disabilities, and to determine whether there were differences in decision making and patient outcome between evaluations by a physiatrist alone or with a multidisciplinary team in this population. Consecutively referred patients with functional complaints in two of the following areas, mobility, activities of daily living, emotions and cognition, work, or social support, were randomly assigned to a multidisciplinary outpatient team evaluation or physiatrist evaluation in an office setting. Forty persons, 21 team and 19 office, served as subjects. For the entire group, functional assessment scores before and after evaluation were as follows: Barthel index 71.79 versus 76.47 (p < .008) and Frenchay Activities index 9.97 versus 11.32 (p < .05) Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test. Patients quality of life differences were significant (p < .03 or less by Wilcoxon). Most differences between team and physiatrist were not shown to be statistically significant in this small population. Physiatric evaluation, with or without a multidisciplinary team, can improve outpatient functional status and quality of life for persons living in the community with complex disabilities.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Persistent functional and social benefit 5 years after a multidisciplinary arthritis training program.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the sustainable benefits of a professional, multidisciplinary training program for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Two studies with different observation periods. Study I was a prospective, randomized trial for 1 year. Study II was a noncontrolled observation over 5 years. SETTING: The 9-day program for eight patient groups encompassed a multidisciplinary cooperation between rheumatologists, orthopedists, physicotherapists, psychologists and social workers. PATIENTS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis participated in an arthritis training program either immediately after enrollment in the program or after 1 year. INTERVENTIONS: The program covered the following fields: pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, drug therapy, physicotherapy, practical exercise in remedial gymnastics, use of joint protection devices, orthopedic perspectives, psychological counseling, dietetics, information about unproven cures and social assistance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcome was assessed by self-report questionnaires: (1) Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire, (2) Freiburg Questionnaire of Coping with Illness, (3) Beck Depression Inventory, and (4) a 21-point scale to evaluate cognitive-behavioral and environmental impact. RESULTS: A significant and persistent improvement of all investigated parameters was demonstrated in the 1-year controlled trial. Between the end-point of the 1-year study and the 5-year evaluation, this improvement increased even more for functional status and coping with illness, whereas depression returned to baseline values. These effects were seen even without reinforcement of the training. CONCLUSION: A professional, multidisciplinary approach to educate patients with rheumatoid arthritis leads to a significant and sustained improvement of the clinical outcome and is an approach that should be established as a part of conventional therapy.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1998

The multidisciplinary management of psammomatoid ossifying fibroma of the orbit.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the multidisciplinary management of psammomatoid ossifying fibroma (POF) of the orbit and to clarify the clinicopathologic terminology. DESIGN: The authors present a cohort of cases of POF involving the frontal and ethmoid sinuses and the orbit and discuss the nomenclature and literature. PARTICIPANTS: Three patients with POF and their treatment are discussed. INTERVENTION: Patients were worked up and treated by a multidisciplinary team using imaging studies and histopathologic analysis. Reconstruction, if necessary, was carried out at the time of excision or in a second-stage procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In each case, the lesion was completely excised and has not recurred. RESULTS: The diagnosis of POF was made in each case, and the patient underwent successful resection of the tumor. CONCLUSION: The authors' experience suggests that a multidisciplinary approach, including a radiologist, pathologist, neurosurgeon, otolaryngologist, craniofacial surgeon, and orbital specialist, may be useful in the evaluation and management of these lesions.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

The multidisciplinary melanoma clinic: a cost outcomes analysis of specialty care.

The traditional process of melanoma care delivery can differ substantially among providers regarding screening laboratories, staging work-ups, surgical margins, and outpatient versus inpatient surgical management. It has been suggested that multidisciplinary care may provide a more cost-effective management approach. We sought to evaluate whether coordinated multidisciplinary melanoma care that follows evidence-based, consensus-approved clinical practice guidelines at a large academic medical center can provide a more efficient alternative to traditional community-based strategies with clinical outcomes that are at least equivalent. The University of Michigan Multidisciplinary Melanoma Clinic (MDMC) possesses a database of demographic, clinical, and treatment information for all patients seen since its inception. A consecutive sample of 104 patients with local disease who were treated in the Michigan community were compared with 104 blindly selected subjects treated at the MDMC during an identical time period, matched for Breslow depth and melanoma body site. Patients treated in the MDMC would save a third party payer roughly $1600 per patient when compared with a similar group treated in the Michigan community. Surgical morbidity, length of hospitalization, and long-term survival of MDMC patients were similar to those reported in the literature. The cost discrepancy is explained by the fundamental differences in the usage pattern of health care resources exhibited by the MDMC compared with the community setting.

Academic Medical Centers↗

PubMed1997

Multidisciplinary predialysis programs: quantification and limitations of their impact on patient outcomes in two Canadian settings.

A 1993 National Institutes of Health Consensus statement stressed the importance of early medical intervention in predialysis populations. Given the need for evidence-based practice, we report the outcomes of predialysis programs in two major Canadian cities. The purpose of this report was to determine whether the institution of a multidisciplinary predialysis program is of benefit to patients, and to analyze those factors that are important in actualizing those benefits. Data from two different studies is presented: (1) a prospective, nonrandomized cohort study comparing patients who were or were not exposed to an ongoing multidisciplinary predialysis team (St Paul's Hospital) and (2) a retrospective review of outcomes before and after the institution of a predialysis program (The Toronto Hospital). Although created independently in major academic centers in Canada, the programs both aimed to reduce urgent dialysis starts, improve preparedness for dialysis, and improve resource utilization. The Vancouver study was able to demonstrate significantly fewer urgent dialysis starts (13% v 35%; P < 0.05), more outpatient training (76% v 43%; P < 0.05), and less hospital days in the first month of dialysis (6.5 days v 13.5 days; P < 0.05). Cost savings of the program patients in 1993 are conservatively estimated to be $173,000 (Canadian dollars) or over $4,000 per patient. The Toronto study demonstrated success in predialysis access creation (86.3% of patients), but could not realize any benefit in terms of elective dialysis initiation due to well-documented hemodialysis resource constraints. We conclude that an approach to predialysis patients involving a multidisciplinary team can have a positive impact on quantitative outcomes, but essential elements for success include (1) early referral to a nephrology center, (2) adequate resources for dedicated predialysis program staff and infrastructure, and (3) available resources for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (dialysis stations). In times of economic constraints, objective data are necessary to justify resource-intensive proactive programs for patients with ESRD. Future studies should confirm and extend our observations so that optimum and cost-effective care for patients approaching ESRD is uniformly available.

Canada↗

PubMed1998

Sociodemographic predictors of treatment outcome in chronic non-malignant pain patients. Do patients receiving or applying for disability pension benefit from multidisciplinary pain treatment?

The present study investigated the ability of sociodemographic variables to predict the short-term effect of multidisciplinary pain treatment in 286 chronic non-malignant pain patients consecutively referred to a Danish multidisciplinary pain centre. At inclusion and 3 and 6 months later the patients' pain and health related quality of life (HRQL) was assessed using self-administered questionnaires. Sociodemographic variables measured were: age, gender, educational level, civil status, employment status and disability pension (DP) status. Intensity of pain was measured using a VAS scale. HRQL was evaluated using the Medical Outcome Study-Short Form (SF-36) and the Psychological General Well-Being Scale (PGWB). Drop out was 30% after 6 months, leaving 170 patients for the study of treatment effects. Among the sociodemographic variables evaluated only retirement pension (RP) and DP-status seemed to be significant outcome predictors: six months after inclusion, patients on RP (patients >68 years, n = 40) reported larger pain reduction (30 mm on the VAS scale) than patients < or =68 years (8 mm on the VAS scale)(P = 0.001). Patients applying for DP-pension (n = 26) did not improve. Patients on DP (n = 54) and patients not receiving DP (n = 50) obtained moderate improvements, but the improvements were significantly larger than the improvements observed in the ApplyDP-group (P = 0.05). The same pattern was seen for changes in psychological well-being (PGWB) and social functioning (SF36-SFA). No improvements were obtained in SF36-Physical functioning scores. DP-status predicted improvement in pain and social functioning even when controlling for the effect of other demographic variables, pain intensity and HRQL at referral. The present study indicates that the multidimensional problems experienced by patients applying for DP are dominated by socioeconomic factors. Focus on solving these socioeconomic problems is important if chronic pain patients are to benefit from multidisciplinary pain treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed1976

Psychiatric training for emergency medicine residents on a multidisciplinary team.

The Cincinnati General Hospital Emergency Department has a training program for emergency medicine residents on a multidisciplinary emergency psychiatry team. This essential training should occur in the emergency department setting rather than in psychiatric inpatient units of state hospital settings. There are advantages and disadvantages to this arrangement. Nonmedical members of the emergency psychiatry team train and support emergency medicine residents in a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Some observations are made about how the emergency medicine residents deal with emotionally disturbed patients. Finally, 80% of emergency medicine residents responded to questionnaire on their reactions to the multidisciplinary emergency psychiatry team.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2002

A randomized trial of the efficacy of multidisciplinary care in heart failure outpatients at high risk of hospital readmission.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether a multidisciplinary outpatient management program decreases chronic heart failure (CHF) hospital readmissions and mortality over a six-month period. BACKGROUND: Hospital admission for CHF is an important problem amenable to improved outpatient management. METHODS: Two hundred patients hospitalized with CHF at increased risk of hospital readmission were randomized to a multidisciplinary program or usual care. A study cardiologist and a CHF nurse evaluated each patient and made recommendations to the patient's primary physician before randomization. The intervention team consisted of a cardiologist, a CHF nurse, a telephone nurse coordinator and the patient's primary physician. Contact with the patient was on a prespecified schedule. The CHF nurse followed an algorithm to adjust medications. Patients in the nonintervention group were followed as usual. The primary outcome was the composite of the number of CHF hospital admissions and deaths over six months, compared by using a log transformation t test by intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: The median age of the study patients was 63.5 years, and 39.5% were women. There were 43 CHF hospital admissions and 7 deaths in the intervention group, as compared with 59 CHF hospital admissions and 13 deaths in the nonintervention group (p = 0.09). The quality-of-life score, percentage of patients on target vasodilator therapy and percentage of patients compliant with diet recommendations were significantly better in the intervention group. Cost per patient, in 1998 U.S. dollars, was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a six-month, multidisciplinary approach to CHF management can improve important clinical outcomes at a similar cost in recently hospitalized high-risk patients with CHF.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A paradigm for multidisciplinary disaster research: the Oklahoma City experience.

The objective of this article is to describe the creation and operation of a multidisciplinary group to examine the Oklahoma City (OKC) bombing. The OKC bombing presented an opportunity to study a major disaster within 2 days of the incident. The Disaster Health Studies Group (DHSG) was created to facilitate this effort. The creation, organization, and operation of the DHSG is outlined. In addition the mission statement, participants, communications, political empowerment, data preservation and collection, data ownership, patient rights, threats to the DHSG, media interactions, funding, the institutional review board process, and results reporting will be detailed. The 22 projects of the DHSG are listed. In conclusion, four main findings are examined: 1) A multidisciplinary disaster study group is feasible and can be rapidly organized; 2) certain organizations and institutions form a core group for facilitation of the research effort; 3) specific issues must be addressed in order for the group to succeed; and 4) the group leader should have disaster expertise and be committed to the multidisciplinary process.

Communication↗

PubMed2001

Economic evaluation of multidisciplinary pain management in chronic pain patients: a qualitative systematic review.

In this qualitative systematic review, we have evaluated studies of the economic effectiveness of multidisciplinary pain treatment in chronic non-malignant pain patients. Published reports were identified from a systematic search of bibliographic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) and reference lists of retrieved reports. Fourteen reports of nine studies of patients suffering from back pain, fibromyalgia, and mixed chronic pain conditions were considered to be appropriate as economic analyses. In the selected studies, we found serious methodological problems in study designs and application of outcome measures. The quality of the cost measurements was characterized by an apparent lack of tradition using economic methodology. This review does not give an answer to whether multidisciplinary pain management in chronic pain patients is cost-effective or not. Application of standard methods of costing and outcome measurement are essential before studies of cost-effectiveness in multidisciplinary pain treatment can be used in decision-making and planning.

Chronic Disease↗

PubMed2001

Elimination of early rehospitalization in a randomized, controlled trial of multidisciplinary care in a high-risk, elderly heart failure population: the potential contributions of specialist care, clinical stability and optimal angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor dose at discharge.

BACKGROUND: Despite a growing body of data demonstrating the benefits of multidisciplinary care in heart failure, persistently high rates of readmission, especially within the first month of discharge, continue to be documented. AIMS: As part of an ongoing randomized study on the value of multidisciplinary care in a high risk (NYHA Class IV), elderly (mean age 69 years) heart failure population, we examined the effects of this intervention on previously high (20%) 1-month readmission rates. METHODS: Unlike previous studies of this approach, both multidisciplinary (MC) and routine care (RC) populations were cared for by the cardiology service, complied with adherence to clinical stability criteria prior to discharge (100% of patients) and received at least target dose angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition with perindopril prior to discharge (94% of indicated patients). We analysed death and unplanned readmission for heart failure at 1 month. RESULTS: This early report from the first 70 patients (67% male, 71% systolic dysfunction with a mean ejection fraction of 31.0+/-6.7%) enrolled in this study demonstrates elimination of 1-month hospital readmission in both RC and MC groups. This unexpected result represents a dramatic improvement both for this patient cohort (20% 30-day readmission rate prior to enrollment reduced to 0% following the index admission in both care groups) and in comparison with available data. CONCLUSIONS: Critical contributors to this improvement appear to be specialist cardiology care, adherence to clinical stability criteria prior to discharge and routine use of target or high-dose ACE inhibitor therapy prior to discharge. Widespread application of this approach may have a dramatic improvement in morbidity of CHF while limiting the escalating costs of this condition.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation versus usual care for chronic low back pain in the community: effects on quality of life.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation has been shown in controlled studies to improve pain and function in patients with chronic back pain. However, specialized back pain rehabilitation centers are rare and only a few patients can participate on this therapy. Implementation of multidisciplinary rehabilitation services in community medicine may enhance both early availability and treatment capacity for comprehensive back pain rehabilitation. PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program (MRP) that was organized by cooperation of local health-care providers in the community with that of the usual care by independent physicians for patients with chronic low back pain. STUDY DESIGN: A comparison between the outcomes (follow-up time of 6 months) of treatment for chronic back pain in the community in a prospective intervention group versus a prospective observational usual care group. PATIENT SAMPLE: All patients were recruited from independent physicians in the community of a selected region who participated voluntarily in the study. Patients were included in the study if they were seeking treatment of pain in the back with possible irradiation into the legs, the pain persisted for at least 3 months without decreasing intensity and there was no indication for surgical intervention. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome was assessed from patients' responses in self-report questionnaires at baseline and after an interval of 6 months. For outcome, we evaluated the health-related quality of life (German version of Short Form [SF] 36), the average pain severity (Numeric Rating Scale), the pain-related interference of function (German version of Brief Pain Inventory), depression (Allgemeine Depressionsskele), time off from work within 3 months before entering and leaving the study and the self-appraisal of improvement. METHODS: In a baseline group, the independent physicians treated the patients with usual care. In the intervention group, the patients were referred by the independent physicians to the study coordinator in the outpatient facilities of the Departments of Neurology or Orthopedics for inclusion in the MRP. The MRP was organized by cooperation of local health-care providers in the community with different specialties (sport teachers, clinical psychologist, physiotherapist and physician) who were experienced in the management of back pain. The MRP (4 hours per day, 3 days per week, 20 days) included 1.5 hours restorative exercise therapy, 0.5 hours physiotherapy, 1 hour cognitive-behavioral therapy, 0.5 hours progressive muscle relaxation and 0.5 hours education. RESULTS: Complete data sets were obtained from 157 patients in the usual care group (documented by 35 independent physicians) and 51 patients in the MRP group. Patients of the MRP group improved in the physical and mental health domains of the SF-36 more than patients treated by usual care (p<.05). Furthermore, days off work were more (p<.05) reduced by the MRP (16+/-35 days) than by usual care (-2+/-39 days). Finally, overall appraisal of successful outcome was better (p<.01) after MRP (54% of patients) as compared with usual care (24% of patients). However, the pain intensity (NRS), the pain-related interference with function (Brief Pain Inventory; BPI) and the depression scores (ADS) did not differ significantly between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: MRP is promising to improve health-related quality of life for patients with chronic back pain in the community. Before implementation of MRP in the repertoire of community medicine, superiority of MRP over usual care should be confirmed by a randomized controlled trial.

Chronic Disease↗

PubMed2004

Performance improvement with a multidisciplinary clinical guideline for patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

BACKGROUND: A horizontally integrated multidisciplinary clinical guideline was created and implemented in 1999-2000 for minimally invasive thoracic surgery (MIS). Guideline elements included complete appropriate preoperative evaluation, minimally invasive surgery techniques, aggressive anesthetic management and absolute pain control, immediate extubation, abolition of "routine" laboratory and imaging investigations, and early and aggressive postoperative patient mobilization in an integrated, multidisciplinary postthoracotomy rehabilitation program. METHODS: In a retrospective controlled cohort study, data were collected for the 501 procedures performed on 311 patients (MIS group) from July 1, 2000, to June 30, 2001, and for 130 similar procedures performed on 90 similar patients under a standard general thoracic surgery ad hoc clinical program from July 1, 1998, to June 30, 1999. RESULTS: After implementation of the clinical guideline, services expanded with a 345% increase in case volume, a 40% reduction in cost, no adverse effects, and increased referring-physician and patient satisfaction. DISCUSSION: Significant performance improvement was realized by implementing a multidisciplinary clinical guideline for thoracic surgery that seamlessly integrated all facets of diagnosis, therapy, and rehabilitation.

Cohort Studies↗

PubMed2003

Outcome for cardiothoracic surgical patients requiring multidisciplinary intensive care.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients who require multidisciplinary intensive care after cardiac surgery have a poor prognosis. The aim was to investigate factors in the mortality of this group of patients at 6 months. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made of the 6-month mortality rate in 301 adults who required admission to a multidisciplinary intensive care unit following cardiac surgery from 1991 to 1997. Mortality was correlated with clinical and patient characteristic variables. RESULTS: The intensive care mortality rate was 34% and at 6 months after patients' discharge from intensive care it was 51%. There were positive correlations with death at 6 months for ventricular failure (odds ratio of death 3.4, P = 0.002), sepsis (odds ratio 3.0, P = 0.004) and age over 80 yr (odds ratio of death 9.2, P = 0.034). Patients who had undergone isolated coronary artery graft surgery (odds ratio of death 0.28, P = 0.036) or thoracic surgery (odds ratio of death 0.22, P = 0.042) had better 6-month outcomes. Patients with respiratory or renal failure in the absence of ventricular failure or sepsis had a 6-month mortality rate of 36%; but the lower mortality rate did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-month mortality rate of 51% in a group of patients requiring multidisciplinary intensive care after cardiac surgery is consistent with previous studies; mortality was particularly high in extreme old age and in patients referred with sepsis or ventricular failure. Those patients with uncomplicated respiratory or renal failure had a better outcome than the group as a whole.

Age Factors↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Multidisciplinary team interaction: summary and Action Plan.

INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary team interaction has become a commonplace phrase in the discussion of disaster response. Theme 6 explored multidisciplinary team interactions and attempted to identify some of the key issues and possible solutions to the seemingly intractable problems inherent in this endeavour. METHODS: Details of the methods used are provided in the introductory paper. The Cochairs moderated all presentations and produced a summary that was presented to an assembly of all of the delegates. The Cochairs then presided over a workshop that resulted in the generation of a set of Action Plans that then were reported to the collective group of all delegates. RESULTS: Main points developed during the presentations and discussion included: (1) promotion of multidisciplinary collaboration, (2) standardization, (3) the Incident Command System, (4) professionalism, (5) regional disparities, and (6) psychosocial impact. DISCUSSION: Action plans recommended: (1) a standardized template for Needs Assessment be developed, implemented, and applied using collaboration with international organizations, focusing on needs and criteria appropriate to each type of event, and (2) team needs assessments be recognized for local responses and for determination of when international assistance may be required, for planning a command system, and for evaluating the psychosocial impact. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear need for the development of standardized methods for the assessment of needs, development and implementation of a command structure, and for appreciation of regional differences and the psychosocial impact of all interventions.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1999

Radiation therapy of metastatic spinal cord compression. Multidisciplinary team diagnosis and treatment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary approach to spinal cord compression (SCC) in accordance with prospective protocol, providing a uniform approach to diagnosis, decision making concerning optimal treatment modality in any particular case of SCC, treatment performance and evaluation of treatment results. The SCC patients treated by radiation therapy are described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with SCC were examined and treated by a multidisciplinary team consisting of a neurologist, radiologist, oncologist, orthopedic surgeon, and neurosurgeon. Seventy-nine patients for whom radiation was recommended received a 30 Gy radiation dose to a compression-causing mass and course of high dose dexamethasone. Three fractions of 5 Gy and 5 fractions 3 Gy each were delivered by Co60 or 8 MV photon beam in 12 days. Treatment outcome was essentially evaluated by ambulation capabilities which were considered to be the main problem of SCC. Changes in other neurologic motor, sensory and autonomic disturbances were also evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of the patients were already non-ambulatory at diagnosis. The first symptom was motor deficiency in only 33% of them while in all other cases it was pain. Ambulation capability was the main prognosticator of treatment outcome; 90% of patients who were ambulatory before treatment remained so while 33% of the non-ambulatory patients regained their ability to walk. The grade of motor disturbance was also an important variable: among the non-ambulatory patients, 50% of the paretic but only 14% of the plegic ones became ambulatory. Overall, 51% of the study patients were ambulatory after undergoing radiation. The ambulatory state after treatment was the main predictor for survival. CONCLUSION: Close cooperation of a multidisciplinary team in diagnosis and treatment according to the above protocol enabled the achievement of good results of radiation treatment in SCC. Early diagnosis and early treatment should further enhance therapeutic outcome.

Adult↗