SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “reaching”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

PubMed2006

Allocentric cues do not always improve whole body reaching performance.

The aim of this investigation was to gain further insight into control strategies used for whole body reaching tasks. Subjects were requested to step and reach to remembered target locations in normal room lighting (LIGHT) and complete darkness (DARK) with their gaze directed toward or eccentric to the remembered target location. Targets were located centrally at three different heights. Eccentric anchors for gaze direction were located at target height and initial target distance, either 30 degrees to the right or 20 degrees to the left of target location. Control trials, where targets remained in place, and remembered target trials were randomly presented. We recorded movements of the hand, eye and head, while subjects stepped and reached to real or remembered target locations. Lateral, vertical and anterior-posterior (AP) hand errors and eye location, and gaze direction deviations were determined relative to control trials. Final hand location errors varied by target height, lighting condition and gaze eccentricity. Lower reaches in the DARK compared to the LIGHT condition were common, and when matched with a tendency to reach above the low target, help explain more accurate reaches for this target in darkness. Anchoring the gaze eccentrically reduced hand errors in the AP direction and increased errors in the lateral direction. These results could be explained by deviations in eye locations and gaze directions, which were deemed significant predictors of final reach errors, accounting for a 17-47% of final hand error variance. Results also confirmed a link between gaze deviations and hand and head displacements, suggesting that gaze direction is used as a common input for movement of the hand and body. Additional links between constant and variable eye deviations and hand errors were common for the AP direction but not for lateral or vertical directions. When combined with data regarding hand error predictions, we found that subjects' alterations in body movement in the AP direction were associated with AP adjustments in their reach, but final hand position adjustments were associated with gaze direction alterations for movements in the vertical and horizontal directions. These results support the hypothesis that gaze direction provides a control signal for hand and body movement and that this control signal is used for movement direction and not amplitude.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Age-related differences in the reaching and grasping coordination in children: unimanual and bimanual tasks.

This study examined age-related differences in the coordinative mechanism of the reach-to-grasp movement in three groups of children aged 6, 8, and 11 year, and in healthy adults. Three prehension conditions were manipulated: an unimanual and a bimanual self-driven tasks in which the reaching and grasping of the object were performed by participants, and a bimanual externally-driven task, in which the experimenter brought the object into the vicinity of the participant which grasped it. Classical kinematics data-peak velocities of the reaching and the grasping, the time to onset grip opening, maximum grip opening and grip closure-were calculated. Moreover, to obtain equivalent kinematics variables for all age groups, relative time to peak velocity (% of reaching duration), relative maximum grip opening (% of object size), and percentage of the four types of phase plans between reaching velocity and grip size have been calculated for each group of age. Our main results showed (1) a high variability at age 6, (2) an age-related change between the 6- and 8-year old for almost all of the dependent variables, and (3) a significant difference between the 11-year olds and adults. In summary, at 6 years, the interdependence between the reaching and grasping programs was unstable. A transitory feedback-based coordination between reaching and grasping appeared at 8 years of age. Finally, the adults' relationship between reaching and grasping was not attained at the age of 11.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Visual distractors differentially interfere with the reaching and grasping components of prehension movements.

In the present study we addressed the issue of how an object is visually isolated from surrounding cues when a reaching-grasping (prehension) movement towards it is planned. Subjects were required to reach and grasp an object presented either alone or with a distractor. In five experiments, different degrees of elaboration of the distractor were induced by varying: (1) the position of the distractor (central or peripheral); (2) the time when the distractor was suppressed (immediately or delayed, with respect to stimulus presentation); and (3) the type of distractor analysis (implicit or explicit). In addition, we tested whether the possible effects of the distractor on reaching-grasping were due to the use of an allocentric reference centered on it. This was obtained by comparing the effects of the distractor with those of a stimulus, the target of a placing movement successive to the reaching-grasping. The results of the five experiments can be summarized as follows. The necessary condition for an interference effect on both the reaching and the grasping components was the central presentation of the distractor. When the information on the distractor could be immediately suppressed, an interference effect was observed only on the grasp component. In the case of delayed suppression, an effect was found on the reaching component. Finally, when an overt analysis of the distractor was required, the interference effect disappeared. Two main conclusions have been drawn from the results of the present study. First, comparison between properties of the target and surrounding cues is performed by two independent processes for reaching and grasping an object. The process for the grasp relies more on allocentric cues than that for the reach. Second, when surrounding stimuli are automatically analyzed during visual search of the target, the process of visuo-motor transformation can incorporate their features into the target. In contrast, overt analysis of surrounding stimuli is performed separately from that of the target. Finally, the data of the present study are discussed in support of the premotor theory of attention.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

The performance of left-handed participants on a preferential reaching test.

Previous research in our laboratory has examined the distribution of preferred hand (PH) reaches in working space with right-handed participants. In one study, we examined the effects of tool position and task demands on the frequency of PH reaches with right-handers (Mamolo, Roy, Bryden, & Rohr, 2004). We found that PH reaches were at a maximum within ipsilateral space, and predominated within contralateral space. This was mediated by the task demands, as shown by an increased frequency of PH reaches for the more skill demanding tasks. In the current study, we tested left-handed participants on the same procedure. Five different tools were placed in an array in front of the participant, who was required to reach for, and perform one of three tasks with the tool: Lift the tool; lift and Pantomime its use; or lift and Use the tool on its corresponding object. The results showed that PH reaches were at a maximum within ipsilateral space for all three tasks. Significantly fewer PH reaches were made for tools in contralateral space. In particular, almost no PH reaches were made for the Lift task at the most extreme contralateral position. This indicates the willingness of left-handers to use their non-preferred (i.e., right) hand. One possible explanation supported by these results is that left-handers have adapted to an environment designed for right-handers.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Abnormalities in skilled reaching movements are improved by peripheral anesthetization of the less-affected forelimb after sensorimotor cortical infarcts in rats.

Unilateral damage to sensorimotor cortical (SMC) regions can profoundly impair skilled reaching function in the contralesional forelimb. Such damage also results in impairments and compensatory changes in the less-affected/ipsilesional forelimb, but these effects remain poorly understood. Furthermore, anesthetization of the ipsilesional hand in humans with cerebral infarcts has been reported to produce transient functional improvements in the paretic hand [Floel A, Nagorsen U, Werhahn KJ, Ravindran S, Birbaumer N, Knecht S, et al. Influence of somatosensory input on motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Ann Neurol 2004;56:206-12; Voller B, Floel A, Werhahn KJ, Ravindran S, Wu CW, Cohen LG. Contralateral hand anesthesia transiently improves poststroke sensory deficits. Ann Neurol 2006;59:385-8]. One aim of this study was to sensitively assay the bilateral effects of unilateral ischemic SMC damage on performance of a unimanual skilled reaching task (the single pellet retrieval task) that rats had acquired pre-operatively with each forelimb. The second aim was to determine whether partially recovered contralesional reaching function is influenced by anesthetization of the ipsilesional forelimb. Unilateral SMC lesions were found to result in transient ipsilesional impairments in reaching success and significant ipsilesional abnormalities in reaching movements compared with sham-operates. There were major contralesional reaching impairments which improved during a 4 week training period, but movements remained significantly abnormal. Anesthetization of the ipsilesional forelimb with lidocaine at this time attenuated the contralesional movement abnormalities. These findings indicate that unilateral ischemic SMC lesions impair skilled reaching behavior in both forelimbs. Furthermore, after partial recovery in the contralesional forelimb, additional improvements can be induced by transient anesthetization of the ipsilesional forelimb. This is consistent with the effects of unilateral anesthetization in humans which have been attributed to the modulation of competitive interhemispheric interactions. The present findings suggest that such interactions are also likely to influence skilled reaching function in rats.

Anesthesia↗

PubMed2006

Kinematic analysis of unimanual reaching and grasping movements in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: Kinematic investigations of prehension movements made by children with cerebral palsy are few and mainly focus on the reaching phase. To increase understandings of how both reaching and grasping movements are organized in these children, the aim was to investigate their spatiotemporal characteristics and additionally, how different kinematic parameters are related to the level of hand functions. METHODS: Eleven children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy; categorized as "mild" and "moderate", in their age of 5.8-12 years and eleven typically developing, "control" children participated. Reaching and grasping made with both the affected/non-preferred and unaffected/preferred sides were recorded and several kinematic parameters investigated. FINDINGS: In comparison to the control and the mild hemiplegic children, the moderate children exhibited more segmented reaches, longer reach- and grasp durations, and with no anticipatory shaping of the fingers when grasping with the affected hand. Their reaching path with the "unaffected" hand was also more segmented. The mild hemiplegic children showed ability for anticipatory hand closure and performed reaches with similar duration and trajectory as controls. The velocity at hand-object-contact and the quality of their grasping was however affected in comparison to the controls. INTERPRETATION: Findings from the investigated kinematics provide evidence of how spatiotemporal organization of reaching and grasping are affected in children with hemiplegia and related to the level of impaired hand functions. The outcomes clearly show that if these children are treated as one homogeneous group much information about their prehension capacity described from the kinematics will be concealed. Thus, observations of importance for developing effective, individual interventions adjusted to different level of impairments.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

PubMed1995

Functional reach in wheelchair users: the effects of trunk and lower extremity stabilization.

Our purpose was to compare the effects of using wheelchair trunk and lower extremity stabilization on sitting trunk mobility and functional reach of wheelchair users. Seven subjects with paraplegia who averaged 35.6 years of age and nine able-bodied control subjects with an average age of 26.0 years participated in this study. Each subject's functional reach in the transverse and sagittal planes was video-recorded in each of three conditions, randomized in order: (1) without a belt; (2) with a neoprene chest belt; and (3) with a webbing thigh belt. The area circumscribed by each subject's functional reach under each condition was processed using the Motion Analysis Expert Vision Flextrak program. Functional reach in each belting condition was compared within each subject and between able-bodied controls and subjects with high and low thoracic levels of paraplegia. This study showed that in the sagittal plane, subjects with both high and low thoracic levels of paraplegia were able to substantially increase the area of their functional reach when using a chest belt when compared with the thigh belt or no-belt condition. The mean area of their sagittal plane functional reach increased by over 50% by stabilizing the chest to the wheelchair using a neoprene belt. However, in the transverse plane, only those individuals with lower thoracic paraplegia (T8 to L1) gained substantial benefit from chest strapping, increasing the area of their functional reach by a mean of 24%. In contrast, able-bodied control subjects gained no benefit in functional reach from either belting condition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Prism adaptation of reaching is dependent on the type of visual feedback of hand and target position.

The present study demonstrated that the magnitude of after-effect due to wedge prisms depends on the form of the visual feedback used to represent hand and target position in fast, targeted, transverse reaches. Trained human subjects made reaches with and without prisms in three visuomotor representations (VR): (1) the subject's actual hand and targets (Direct), (2) a real-time video broadcast of hand and targets (Video), or (3) abstract, computer-generated targets and a cursor representing hand position (Cursor). A significant after-effect occurred in each VR. However, the magnitude of the after-effect was significantly different among VRs: the magnitude was greatest in Direct, smaller in Video and smallest in Cursor. A significant after-effect (carryover) also occurred when a subject prism-adapted reaches in one VR and then removed the prisms and made initial reaches in another VR. Our data showed that when reaches were prism-adapted in Direct and then prisms were removed, there was a large carryover to initial reaches in Video or Cursor (D-->V and D-->C). In contrast, when prisms were worn in Video and removed for reaches in Direct (V-->D), there was a significantly smaller carryover than from both D-->V and D-->C. Finally, when prisms were worn in Cursor and removed for reaches in Direct (C-->D), there was very little detectable carryover. Our results suggest that adaptation is context-dependent and that the magnitude of carryover is dependent on the VR in which adaptation occurred. Interpretations of adaptations made in abstract training and experimental conditions may be greatly affected by this finding.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed1999

Sitting balance I: trunk-arm coordination and the contribution of the lower limbs during self-paced reaching in sitting.

The effects of reach distance and type of task on the functional relationship between the trunk, upper limb segments and the lower limbs during self-paced reaching in sitting were examined. Two-dimensional kinematic, kinetic and electromyography (EMG) data were collected as six healthy subjects reached forward under three distance (60, 100, 140% arm's length) and two task (reaching to press a switch, reaching to grasp a glass) conditions. The results demonstrate that type of task affected primarily the temporal aspects of coordination, with the grasp task taking consistently longer than the press task. In contrast, reach distance affected both the spatio-temporal aspects of coordination between the trunk and arm segments and the active contribution of the lower limbs. As reach distance increased, the magnitude of trunk and upper-arm segmental motion increased, whereas forearm segmental motion decreased. However, at each reach distance the path of the hand was relatively straight and there was remarkable consistency in the relationship between trunk and arm segments both within and between subjects suggesting that despite the presence of redundant degrees of freedom, the individual uses a parsimonious coordinative pattern. The vertical ground reaction force (GRF) and EMG data demonstrated that the lower limbs actively contributed to support the body mass when the object was located at 140% arm's length.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Comparing measures of monocular distance perception: verbal and reaching errors are not correlated.

Monocular perception of egocentric distance via optic flow generated by head movement toward a target was investigated with a helmet-mounted video camera and display. Ability to perceive target distance was assessed with 2 response measures: verbal reports and reaches. Systematic and random errors differed as a function of the response measure. Verbal estimates of targets within and beyond reach were obtained before and after the performance of reaches to targets within reach. Systematic errors of verbal estimates changed but did not decrease overall. Random error decreased. Verbal estimates and reaches were performed concurrently to targets within reach. Verbal and reaching errors were uncorrelated. Verbal judgments appear to have been anchored using the range of distances experienced while reaching rather than being calibrated to the perceptual information itself. Discussion focuses on the advantages of action response measures.

Adult↗

PubMed1985

Object perception and object-directed reaching in infancy.

Five-month-old infants were presented with a small object, a larger object, and a background surface arranged in depth so that all were within reaching distance. Patterns of reaching for this display were observed, while spatial and kinetic properties of the display were varied. When the infants reached for the display, they did not reach primarily for the surfaces that were nearer, smaller, or presented in motion. The infants reached, instead, for groups of surfaces that formed a unit that was spatially connected and/or that moved as a whole relative to its surroundings. Infants reached for the nearer of two objects as a distinct unit when the objects were separated in depth or when one object moved relative to the other. They reached for the two objects as a single unit when the objects were adjacent or when they moved together. The reaching patterns provided evidence that the infants organized each display into the kind of units that adults call objects: manipulable units with internal coherence and external boundaries. Infants, like adults, perceived objects by detecting both the spatial arrangements and the relative movements of surfaces in the three-dimensional layout.

Depth Perception↗

PubMed2000

Maximum reach envelope for the seated and standing male and female for industrial workstation design.

Maximum reach envelopes for the 5th, 50th and 95th percentile reach lengths of males and females in seated and standing work positions were determined. The use of a computerized potentiometric measurement system permitted functional reach measurement in 15 min for each subject. The measurement system captured reach endpoints in a dynamic mode while the subjects were describing their maximum reach envelopes. An unbiased estimate of the true reach distances was made through a systematic computerized data averaging process. The maximum reach envelope for the standing position was significantly (p<0.05) larger than the corresponding measure in the seated position for both the males and females. The average reach length of the female was 13.5% smaller than that for the corresponding male. Potential applications of this research include designs of industrial workstations, equipment, tools and products.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Self-sitting and reaching in 5- to 8-month-old infants: the impact of posture and its development on early eye-hand coordination.

The relation between progress in the control of posture (i.e., the achievement of self-sitting posture) and the developmental transition from two-handed to one-handed engagement in infant reaching was investigated. Two groups of 5- to 8-month-old infants, who were either able or yet unable to sit on their own, were videotaped while they reached for objects in four different posture conditions that provided varying amounts of body support. Videotapes of infant reaches were microanalyzed to determine the relative engagement of both hands during reaches. Results demonstrate the interaction between postural development and the morphology of infant reaching. Nonsitting infants displayed symmetrical and synergistic engagement of both arms and hands while reaching in all but the seated posture condition. Sitting infants, by contrast, showed asymmetrical and lateralized (one-handed) reaches in all posture conditions. Results also show that, aside from posture, the perceived spatial arrangement of the object display is a determinant of infant reaching. Combined, these results are discussed as evidence for the interaction between postural and perceptual development in the control of early eye-hand coordination.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2002

Biomechanics of reaching: clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury.

PURPOSE: Outline the biomechanics of reaching both in healthy individuals and in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI), and to discuss the clinical implications for using valid biomechanical models to assess reaching. METHODS: A review of current literature, including a MEDLINE search using keywords of reaching, ABI, stroke, biomechanics and motor control. RESULTS: Current assessments of the upper extremity in ABI are focused on single-joint characteristics of range of motion, strength and spasticity. However, reaching is a functional multijoint task requiring interjoint coordination in addition to feedback and feedforward control to position the hand optimally at a desired location so that it may interact with the environment. From the literature, biomechanical measures of reaching such as movement time, movement distance and interjoint coordination have been shown to discriminate changes to hand path quality following brain injury. These measures have also been shown to correlate with measures of sensorimotor function (e.g. Fugl-Meyer) in the upper extremity. CONCLUSIONS: Further development of reliable and valid multi-joint biomechanical evaluations is required, particularly for natural and goal-oriented reaching movements. The biomechanical assessment of reaching in ABI can provide an understanding of the specific deficits in physiological structures or motor planning underlying altered reaching ability, assist in the evaluation of new therapies, and characterize the recovery process following ABI.

Arm↗

PubMed2003

Does the functional reach test reflect stability limits in elderly people?

OBJECTIVE: To explore how the Functional Reach test correlates with the displacement of the centre of pressure and whether the test is a measure of the stability limits in healthy elderly people. Also to explore the performance parameters during the Functional Reach test. DESIGN: Method comparison study. SUBJECTS: Twenty-seven healthy elderly subjects. METHODS: Whole body kinematics (ELITE systems), ground reaction forces (AMTI) and muscle activity (EMG) parallel with clinical yardstick measure while performing the Functional Reach test. RESULTS: This study showed a low correlation (r = 0.38) between reach distance and displacement of centre of pressure and a moderate correlation (r = 0.68) between forward rotation of the trunk and reach distance. The movement during the Functional Reach test was characterized by a large forward rotation of the trunk and a small extension in the ankle. The latter constraining centre of pressure forward displacement. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the Functional Reach test is a weak measure of the stability limits. Movement of the trunk seems to influence the test more than the displacement of the centre of pressure. When using the Functional Reach test for assessing balance, compensatory mechanisms should be taken into account.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

Posture and reaching in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella).

This research investigated the effects of posture on lateral bias for food reaching in tufted capuchin monkeys ( Cebus apella ) by comparing hand preferences for quadrupedal and bipedal reaching. Several findings of this investigation warrant discussion. First, we found a population-level bias towards use of the right hand for bipedal reaching but not for quadrupedal reaching. Second, adults exhibited a greater right-hand preference for bipedal reaching than did immatures. Third, subjects showed a greater right-hand preference, and a greater strength of preference independent of direction, for bipedal reaching than for quadrupedal reaching. Fourth, we found a significant positive relation between the direction of hand preference for quadrupedal and bipedal reaching. We believe that capuchins provide an alternative primate model to chimpanzees for the evolution of human bipedalism and right-handedness. One implication of this model is that right-handedness emerged in hominids prior to extensive expansion of brain size and elaboration of material culture.

Journal Article↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The development of infants' reaches for stationary and moving targets.

The organization of infants' reaching skill for stationary and moving targets was examined. While 58 term, healthy infants at 5.5, 8.5, and 11.5 months of age reached for and grasped a cloth-covered dowel, their reaches were videotaped for later slow-motion analysis. Analyses addressed infants' anticipatory adjustment of hand alignment, use of information from spinning and oscillating targets to update ongoing reaches, and ability to capture targets moving in depth. Infants at all ages made anticipatory adjustments of hand alignment, although the effectiveness of these adjustments improved with age. Regardless of age, infants also used dynamic information from spinning and oscillating targets to update ongoing reaches, but the way infants used this information was related to age. Developmental constancy characterized infants' reaches for approaching targets. By observing infants' reaches for stationary, spinning, and approaching targets, the study expands the range of conditions under which adaptive reaching skill has been examined and provides insight into the roles of anticipation and updating in the development of early manual skill.

Age Factors↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The relation of unimanual and bimanual reaching to crossing the midline.

The present study assessed the development of reaching for objects positioned in front of the contralateral shoulder. In particular, it examined how the development of crossing the midline is related to the development of bimanual reaching. Twenty infants were observed longitudinally at 12, 18, and 26 weeks of age while reaching for two balls (3 cm and 8 cm in diameter) located at three positions (ispsilateral, midline, and contralateral). The reaches were analyzed from video recordings. With age, the infants increasingly adapted the number of hands used to the size of the object. The number of reaches crossing the body midline increased with age. Furthermore, the majority of the midline crossings were part of two-handed reaches for the large ball and occurred at or after onset of bimanual reaching. Together, these findings strongly suggest that the development of crossing the body midline emerges in the context of bimanual reaching. It was concluded that the need to grasp a large ball positioned contralaterally with two hands induces midline crossing. Hence, the development of midline crossings is not exclusively dependent on organismic constraints (e.g., the maturation of hemispheric connections), but rather on their interaction with environmental constraints (e.g., object size).

Brain↗