PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “retroelements”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Presence of retroelements reveal the evolutionary history of the human DR haplotypes.

Comparison of intron sequences has been a successful tool for drawing major conclusions about the evolutionary relationship of DRB genes. This complex family of genes is discussed in this review as well as a proposed model for the evolution of HLA-DR haplotypes. The model is based both on phylogenetic analysis of intron sequences as well as presence of ERV9 LTR elements located at identical position in intron 5 of a number of DRB genes. According to this model, two main evolutionary branches of DR haplotypes exist. The DR53 haplotype represents one branch, and the second branch contains the DR51, DR52, DR1, and DR8 haplotypes. After the divergence of the DR53 haplotype, an ERV9 LTR element was inserted in a primordial gene. Consequently, all DRB1 genes as well as the DRB3 gene within haplotypes of the second branch, contain this LTR element. In addition, conserved regulatory sequence motifs are found present within these LTR elements that might regulate DRB gene expression. Novel haplotypes are generated by recombinations and the maintenance of the DR haplotype variation as well as the frequent genetic rearrangements observed might be evolutionary advantageous.

Animals↗
PubMed2025

Evolution of antiviral host defenses against a backdrop of endogenous retroelements.

Mammalian hosts deploy a multitude of germ line-encoded mechanisms to detect and restrict virus infection. These mechanisms must avoid pathological responses to endogenous retroviruses and other endogenous retrotransposable elements (RTEs)-viruses and viruslike genomic parasites that have invaded the host germ line and are passed down the generations as host genes. Although the location, specificity, and sensitivity of innate pattern recognition receptors and restriction factors are tuned to facilitate discrimination of infecting viruses from those that are part of self, immune cross-reactions do occur. The RTE viral heritage may, therefore, compromise the ability of the host to respond to virus infection without risking pathology. Nevertheless, RTEs have the potential to be co-opted as an alarm amplification system, to be repurposed as antiviral factors, and to contribute to the evolution of antiviral genes.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

A new, expressed multigene family containing a hot spot for insertion of retroelements is associated with polymorphic subtelomeric regions of Trypanosoma brucei.

We describe a novel gene family that forms clusters in subtelomeric regions of Trypanosoma brucei chromosomes and partially accounts for the observed clustering of retrotransposons. The ingi and ribosomal inserted mobile element (RIME) non-LTR retrotransposons share 250 bp at both extremities and are the most abundant putatively mobile elements, with about 500 copies per haploid genome. From cDNA clones and subsequently in the T. brucei genomic DNA databases, we identified 52 homologous gene and pseudogene sequences, 16 of which contain a RIME and/or ingi retrotransposon inserted at exactly the same relative position. Here these genes are called the RHS family, for retrotransposon hot spot. Comparison of the protein sequences encoded by RHS genes (21 copies) and pseudogenes (24 copies) revealed a conserved central region containing an ATP/GTP-binding motif and the RIME/ingi insertion site. The RHS proteins share between 13 and 96% identity, and six subfamilies, RHS1 to RHS6, can be defined on the basis of their divergent C-terminal domains. Immunofluorescence and Western blot analyses using RHS subfamily-specific immune sera show that RHS proteins are constitutively expressed and occur mainly in the nucleus. Analysis of Genome Survey Sequence databases indicated that the Trypanosoma brucei diploid genome contains about 280 RHS (pseudo)genes. Among the 52 identified RHS (pseudo)genes, 48 copies are in three RHS clusters located in subtelomeric regions of chromosomes Ia and II and adjacent to the active bloodstream form expression site in T. brucei strain TREU927/4 GUTat10.1. RHS genes comprise the remaining sequence of the size-polymorphic "repetitive region" described for T. brucei chromosome I, and a homologous gene family is present in the Trypanosoma cruzi genome.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2004

Large retrotransposon derivatives: abundant, conserved but nonautonomous retroelements of barley and related genomes.

Retroviruses and LTR retrotransposons comprise two long-terminal repeats (LTRs) bounding a central domain that encodes the products needed for reverse transcription, packaging, and integration into the genome. We describe a group of retrotransposons in 13 species and four genera of the grass tribe Triticeae, including barley, with long, approximately 4.4-kb LTRs formerly called Sukkula elements. The approximately 3.5-kb central domains include reverse transcriptase priming sites and are conserved in sequence but contain no open reading frames encoding typical retrotransposon proteins. However, they specify well-conserved RNA secondary structures. These features describe a novel group of elements, called LARDs or large retrotransposon derivatives (LARDs). These appear to be members of the gypsy class of LTR retrotransposons. Although apparently nonautonomous, LARDs appear to be transcribed and can be recombinationally mapped due to the polymorphism of their insertion sites. They are dispersed throughout the genome in an estimated 1.3 x 10(3) full-length copies and 1.16 x 10(4) solo LTRs, indicating frequent recombinational loss of internal domains as demonstrated also for the BARE-1 barley retrotransposon.

3' Untranslated Regions↗
PubMed1999

Genomes were forged by massive bombardments with retroelements and retrosequences.

Retroposition is an efficient route to move coding regions around the genome 'in search' of novel regulatory elements and to shotgun regulatory elements into the genome 'in search' of new target genes. The templates for such retrogenes are mRNAs, and for regulatory retronuons (nuon = any definable nucleic acid sequence) usually small non-mRNAs (snmRNAs). An example in support of the 'master gene' model for SINEs (short interspersed repetitive elements) is provided with neuronal BC1 RNA. Furthermore, an alternative explanation of LINE (long interspersed repetitive elements) involvement in the generation of SINEs is given. I will also argue that the status of transposable elements with respect to the host resembles more symbiosis than parasitiasis and that host defense is often lenient as if even to 'tolerate or support' retronuons. Finally the paradox of evolution's lack of foresight and the future exaptive use of retronuons is being dealt with by referring to W.F. Doolittle's 'Hierarchical Approaches to Genome Evolution'.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

[Analysis of the suffix short retroelement copies and the encoded protein domain of Drosophila].

To analyze the copies of the suffix short retro-element, its homologs were sought in nucleic acid sequence databases of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. The search yielded several conserved (near identical in sequence) copies, which are indicative of recent suffix transposition, and numerous divergent copies, which suggest ancient suffix transposition. Analysis of the short suffix ORF revealed a conserved protein domain, which was also found as the eighth C-terminal domain in reverse transcriptases of certain long interspersed elements (LINEs). The suffix-encoded polypeptide proved to be homologous to DNA- and RNA-recognizing domains.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2003

[RNA interference is developmentally regulated: analysis of expression of suffix, a short Drosophila retroelement].

Sense and antisense transcripts of suffix and F element were detected at different stages of Drosophila development. A short RNA, similar in size to the full-length suffix transcript, was also found. It was suggested that it could originate from the master copy of the element. Though transcription pattern of these elements changed during the development, transcription remained symmetrical. These data indicate that formation of dsRNA in the cells and triggering of the RNA interference mechanisms are possible at all stages of Drosphila development. Analysis of total RNA samples from all stages of Drosophila development showed that 21- to 25-nt long suffix--specific small interfering RNAs (siRNA), the obligatory products of the RNA interference, were detected only in pupae. Thereafter, RNA interference mechanisms are developmentally regulated and the formation of dsRNA is necessary but not sufficient for launching this potent and specific machinery of post-transcription silencing.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

[Finding of Bov-B LINE retroelement in parthenogenetic and bisexual lizard species of the genus Darevskia (Lacertidae)].

The Bov-B LINE retrotransposon was first discovered in Ruminantia and was long considered to be specific for this order. Later, this mobile element was described in snakes and some lizard species. Analysis of phylogenetic relationships of Bov-B LINE elements from different ruminants, snakes, and lizard species led to the suggestion on horizontal transfer of this retrotransposon from Squamata to Ruminantia. In the Squamata group, Bov-B LINE element was found in all snakes and some lizard species examined. The element was not detected in the genomes of some species of the genera Lacerta and Podarcis. In the present study, using PCR amplification and sequencing of PCR products, Bov-B LINE element was identified in the genomes of parthenogenetic and bisexual species of the genus Darevskia (Lacertidae), as well as in such species as Lacerta agilis and Zootoca vivipara, where this retrotransposon had not been not detected before.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The role of retroelements in evolution: an analysis of the suffix element from the Drosophila genome].

The investigation of sequences homologous to the suffix chains from Drosophila genome revealed the central domain of the element homologous to 16S ribosomal sequence from endosymbiotic organisms. The opposite strand of the element encodes C-domains of reverse transcriptase enzyme in F- and Doc-elements. 19 DNA clones possessing PCR-amplified stretches of genomic DNA were sequenced. It was found that micro-satellite sequences (CAACA)n/(TGTTG)n and (TTTGT)n/(CACAAA)n are the target sites for the insertions of suffix copies in heterochromatic regions of Drosophila genome in both orientations. It was found that the presence of decanucleotide GCGGCCCGGG (GC-box) followed by the alternating stretch (A)5(T)4(A)3(T)2(A)1(T)n (AT-box) led to the fixed polarity of the suffix insertions in the same micro-satellite sequences.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Novel gene expression mechanism in a fission yeast retroelement: Tf1 proteins are derived from a single primary translation product.

In sharp contrast to the single ORF of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe retrotransposon Tf1, retroviruses and most retrotransposons employ two different ORFs to separately encode the Gag and Pol proteins. The different ORFs are thought to allow for overexpression of the Gag protein relative to Pol protein presumed necessary for the assembly of functional retrovirus particles and virus-like particles (VLPs). The results of in vivo experiments designed to detect the transposition of Tf1 show that Tf1 is indeed active and can insert itself into the host genome via a true retrotransposition process. Thus, a paradox emerged between the lack of any obvious means of overexpressing Tf1 Gag protein and the demonstrated functionality of the element. Epitope tagging experiments described here confirm that the Tf1 large ORF is intact and that there is no translational or transcriptional mechanism used to overexpress the Tf1 Gag protein. In addition, we used sucrose gradients and antisera specific for Tf1 capsid (CA) and integrase (IN) to show that the Tf1 proteins do assemble into uniform populations of macromolecular particles that also cosediment with Tf1 reverse transcription products. This evidence suggests that Tf1 proteins form VLPs without using the previously described mechanisms that retroviruses and retrotransposons require to overexpress Gag proteins.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Ty1-copia group retrotransposons and the evolution of retroelements in the eukaryotes.

Ty1-copia group retrotransposons are among the best studied transposable elements in the eukaryotes. This review discusses the extent of these transposons in the eukaryote kingdoms and compares models for the evolution of these genetic elements in the light of recent phylogenetic data. These data show that the Ty1-copia group is widespread among invertebrate eukaryotes, especially in the higher plant kingdom, where these genetic elements are unusually common and heterogeneous in their sequence. The phylogenetic data also suggest that the present day spectrum of Ty1-copia group retrotransposons has been influenced both by divergence during vertical transmission down evolving lineages and by horizontal transmission between distantly related species. Lastly, the factors affecting Ty1-copia group retrotransposon copy number and sequence heterogeneity in eukaryotic genomes and the effects of transpositional quiescence and defective retrotransposons upon evolution of Ty1-copia group retrotransposons are discussed.

Amino Acid Sequence↗