SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Validity”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,441 records · Page 80Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Translation and validation of the Nursing Outcomes Classification labels and definitions for acute care nursing in Iceland.

BACKGROUND: The Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), second edition, consists of 260 patient outcomes with definitions. This has been translated into five languages, but has not been clinically validated outside the United States of America (USA). AIM: The aim of this paper is to describe the translation of the labels and definitions from the NOC, second edition from English to Icelandic and validation for acute-care nursing in Iceland. METHOD: A survey that has been designed to identify nurses' perception of the percentage of patients' for whom each NOC outcome is relevant in clinical nursing practice was used for clinical validation in this study. The translation procedure involved source to target language translation, parallel comparison, pilot test and field test. Validation included test-retest to measure the reliability for each of the 260 outcome variables. Data collected from 140 clinical nurses from 54 departments within 13 nursing specialties at Landspitali University-Hospital in Iceland, in November 2001, were analysed to establish construct validity by confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was calculated. RESULTS: Translation was successful. Test-retest showed that 181 of the 260 NOC outcomes were significant (P < 0.05) and moderately or highly correlated (r > 0.50) (Pearson's correlation). The confirmatory factor analysis showed that 22 of the 29 NOC classes had only one factor at the loading criteria > or =0.30. Of the 260 outcomes, 244 had loading on one factor (> or =0.30) within its class. Internal consistency was >0.80 (Cronbach's alpha). LIMITATIONS: Low response rate was a limitation. The indicators of each NOC outcome were not addressed. CONCLUSION: The Icelandic version of the NOC survey is a comprehensive tool that can be applied to nursing in acute-care for research purposes as well as to prepare for the implementation of NOC in clinical information systems.

Humans↗

PubMed1985

Reliability, validity and efficiency of multiple choice question and patient management problem item formats in assessment of clinical competence.

Despite a lack of face validity, there continues to be heavy reliance on objective paper-and-pencil measures of clinical competence. Among these measures, the most common item formats are patient management problems (PMPs) and three types of multiple choice questions (MCQs): one-best-answer (A-types); matching questions (M-types); and multiple true/false questions (X-types). The purpose of this study is to compare the reliability, validity and efficiency of these item formats with particular focus on whether MCQs and PMPs measure different aspects of clinical competence. Analyses revealed reliabilities of 0.72 or better for all item formats; the MCQ formats were most reliable. Similarly, efficiency analyses (reliability per unit of testing time) demonstrated the superiority of MCQs. Evidence for validity obtained through correlations of both programme directors' ratings and criterion group membership with item format scores also favoured MCQs. More important, however, is whether MCQs and PMPs measure the same or different aspects of clinical competence. Regression analyses of the scores on the validity measures (programme directors' ratings and criterion group membership) indicated that MCQs and PMPs seem to be measuring predominantly the same thing. MCQs contribute a small unique variance component over and above PMPs, while PMPs make the smallest unique contribution. As a whole, these results indicate that MCQs are more efficient, reliable and valid than PMPs.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2005

Sources of validity evidence for an internal medicine student evaluation system: an evaluative study of assessment methods.

BACKGROUND: Medical students' final clinical grades in internal medicine are based on the results of multiple assessments that reflect not only the students' knowledge, but also their skills and attitudes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the sources of validity evidence for internal medicine final assessment results comprising scores from 3 evaluations and 2 examinations. METHODS: The final assessment scores of 8 cohorts of Year 4 medical students in a 6-year undergraduate programme were analysed. The final assessment scores consisted of scores in ward evaluations (WEs), preceptor evaluations (PREs), outpatient clinic evaluations (OPCs), general knowledge and problem-solving multiple-choice questions (MCQs), and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). Sources of validity evidence examined were content, response process, internal structure, relationship to other variables, and consequences. RESULTS: The median generalisability coefficient of the OSCEs was 0.62. The internal consistency reliability of the MCQs was 0.84. Scores for OSCEs correlated well with WE, PRE and MCQ scores with observed (disattenuated) correlation of 0.36 (0.77), 0.33 (0.71) and 0.48 (0.69), respectively. Scores for WEs and PREs correlated better with OSCE than MCQ scores. Sources of validity evidence including content, response process, internal structure and relationship to other variables were shown for most components. CONCLUSION: There is sufficient validity evidence to support the utilisation of various types of assessment scores for final clinical grades at the end of an internal medicine rotation. Validity evidence should be examined for any final student evaluation system in order to establish the meaningfulness of the student assessment scores.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2005

The development, validity and reliability of a multimodality objective structured clinical examination in psychiatry.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the development, validity and reliability of a multimodality objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in undergraduate psychiatry, integrating interactive face-to-face and telephone history taking and communication skills stations, videotape mental state examinations and problem-oriented written stations. METHODS: The development of the OSCE on a restricted budget is described. This study evaluates the validity and reliability of 4 15-18-station OSCEs for 128 students over 1 year. Face and content validity were assessed by a panel of clinicians and from feedback from OSCE participants. Correlations with consultant clinical 'firm grades' were performed. Interrater reliability and internal consistency (interstation reliability) were assessed using generalisability theory. RESULTS: The OSCE was feasible to conduct and had a high level of high perceived face and content validity. Consultant firm grades correlated moderately with scores on interactive stations and poorly with written and video stations. Overall reliability was moderate to good, with G-coefficients in the range 0.55-0.68 for the 4 OSCEs. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating a range of modalities into an OSCE in psychiatry appears to represent a feasible, generally valid and reliable method of examination on a restricted budget. Different types of stations appear to have different advantages and disadvantages, supporting the integration of both interactive and written components into the OSCE format.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2005

Validation of Impact of Events Scale in nurses under threat of contagion by severe acute respiratory syndrome.

The purpose of the present study was to validate the Impact of Events Scale (IES) in a sample of nurses working under threat of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). The internal consistency, construct validity and convergent validity of the instrument were examined in a sample of 128 nurses during the SARS outbreak in Taiwan. Principal component analysis followed by a quartimax rotation were used to derive a two-factor solution, labeled intrusion (factor 1) and avoidance (factor 2), with both factors accounting for 50.7% of the explained variance. The total Cronbach's alpha of 0.90 reflected the good internal consistency of the instrument. Correlation with the Symptoms Checklist 90-R demonstrated the convergent validity of the IES. In conclusion, the IES can be used as a convenient, reliable and valid instrument for evaluation of the psychological distress of nurses working with the highly contagious disease.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Initial validation of a bowel symptom questionnaire and measurement of chronic gastrointestinal symptoms in Australians.

BACKGROUND: Chronic gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are believed to be common in the general population, but Australian data are lacking. A valid instrument is required to assess GI symptoms adequately and determine their prevalence in the community. AIMS: To test the feasibility, reliability and concurrent validity of a self-report Bowel Symptom Questionnaire (BSQ) as a measure of GI symptoms, and obtain preliminary data on the prevalence of symptoms in an Australian population-based sample. METHODS: Outpatients (n = 63), volunteers (n = 163) and a random sample (n = 99) of the Penrith population, Sydney, completed the BSQ. Feasibility was evaluated in 264 subjects. Reliability was measured by a test-retest procedure (n = 43), while concurrent validity was documented by comparing self-report data with an independent interview (n = 20). The response rate in the population mail survey was 68%. Prevalence data on bowel symptoms in the community sample (n = 99) were age and gender standardised to the Australian population. RESULTS: The majority of subjects found the BSQ easy to complete (97%) and understand (97%); 90% completed the questionnaire in half an hour or less. Reliability (median kappa 0.70, interquartile range 0.20) and concurrent validity (median kappa 0.79, interquartile range 0.26) of GI symptoms were both very acceptable. The internal consistency of all GI symptom scales was good (Cronbach's Alpha range 0.51-0.74). The prevalence of the irritable bowel syndrome (defined as abdominal pain and disturbed defaecation based on two or more of the Manning criteria) was 17.2% (95% CI: 10-25%). CONCLUSIONS: The BSQ was well accepted and easy to understand; it provided reliable and valid data on GI symptoms and should prove useful in large scale epidemiological studies in Australia.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Reliability and validity of women's recall of mammographic screening.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of self-reported attendance for mammographic screening. METHODS: To assess reliability of recall of attendance for a screening mammogram, 100 women selected at random were interviewed twice (approximately one week apart). To assess validity, 127 women who reported having a mammogram within the national breast screening program (BreastScreen Australia) consented to having their reports verified by the national program. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability for the question "Have you ever had a mammogram?" was perfect (agreement 100%, kappa 1). Validity was also high. About one-quarter of women (24.4%) recalled the exact date of their last mammogram and a further third (39.4%) correctly reported the month in which the mammogram was done. Almost all (91.3%) women reported the mammogram date accurately to within 12 months of the recorded date. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that Australian women provide reliable and valid information in relation to mammographic screening attendance. IMPLICATIONS: Self-reported data about attendance for mammographic screening are likely to provide reliable and valid estimates for research and health services evaluation purposes.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Validity of measures is no simple matter.

PURPOSE AND METHOD: This article aims to promote a better understanding of the nature of measurement, the special problems posed by measurement in the social sciences, and the inevitable limitations on inferences in science (so that results are not overinterpreted), by using the measurement of blood pressure as an example. As it is necessary to raise questions about the meaning and extent of the validity of something as common as measured blood pressure, even more serious questions are unavoidable in relation to other commonly used measures in social science. The central issue is the validity of the inferences about the construct rather than the validity of the measure per se. CONCLUSION: It is important to consider the definition and validity of the construct at issue as well as the adequacy of its representation in the measurement instrument. By considering a particular construct within the context of a conceptual model, researchers and clinicians will improve their understanding of the construct's validity as measured.

Blood Pressure Determination↗

PubMed2004

Development and validation of a functional morbidity index to predict mortality in community-dwelling elders.

OBJECTIVE: Functional measures have a great appeal for prognostic instruments because they are associated with mortality, they represent the end-impact of disease on the patient, and information about them can be obtained directly from the patient. However, there are no prognostic indices that have been developed for community-dwelling elders based primarily on functional measures. Our objective in this study was to develop and validate a prognostic index for 2-year mortality in community-dwelling elders, based on self-reported functional status, age, and gender. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study from 1993 to 1995. SETTING: Community-dwelling elders within the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects, age > or =70 (N = 7,393), from the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old study. We developed the index in 4,516 participants (mean age 78, 84% white, 61% female), and validated it in 2,877 different participants (mean age 78, 73% white, 61% female). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prediction of 2-year mortality using risk factors such as activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, additional measures of physical function, age, and gender. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 10% in the development cohort and 12% in the validation cohort. In the development cohort, 6 independent predictors of mortality were identified and weighted, using logistic regression models, to create a point scale: male gender, 2 points; age (76 to 80, 1 point; >80, 2 points); dependence in bathing, 1 point; dependence in shopping, 2 points; difficulty walking several blocks, 2 points; and difficulty pulling or pushing heavy objects, 1 point. We calculated risk scores for each patient by adding the points of each independent risk factor present. In the development cohort, 2-year mortality was 3% in the lowest risk group (0 to 2 points), 11% in the middle risk group (3 to 6 points), and 34% in the highest risk group (>7 points). In the validation cohort, 2-year mortality was 5% in the lowest risk group, 12% in the middle risk group, and 36% in the highest risk group. The c-statistics for the point system were 0.76 and 0.74 in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This prognostic index, which relies solely on self-reported functional status, age, and gender, provides a simple and accurate method of stratifying community-dwelling elders into groups at varying risk of mortality.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed1994

Concurrent validation of substance abusers self-reports against collateral information: percentage agreement vs. kappa vs. Yule's Y.

The ability for chemical users to give an accurate self-report of substance use vs. abstinence has been questioned. This study investigated its concurrent validity, against collateral ratings. The results indicated that validity of reports of chemical use must be evaluated in the context of the validity of other types of information. Chemical use items were corroborated about as often as such nonchemical use items as reports of emergency room visits, arrests, and hospitalizations, thus arguing against the presence of a specific denial syndrome or overarching tendency toward self-misrepresentation. Relative concurrent validities seemed more a function of such factors as item salience and specificity. No consistent trend in patient over- or underreporting of chemical use was found. The choice of concurrent validation statistic is important and can influence interpretation of results. Current standards such as percentage agreement and kappa were seen as flawed; comparisons of results based on these two measures, as well as Yule's Y led to the conclusion that Yule's Y is the statistic of choice.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Functional status before hospitalization in acutely ill older adults: validity and clinical importance of retrospective reports.

OBJECTIVES: Retrospective reports of patients' functional status before hospital admission are often used in longitudinal studies and by clinicians caring for hospitalized patients. However, the validity of these reports has not been established. Our aim was to examine the validity of retrospective reports by testing hypotheses about the relationships these measures would have with other clinical measures if they were valid. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: A total of 2877 older patients (mean age 81, 36% women) hospitalized on the general medical service at two hospitals. For 1953 of the subjects, the patient was the primary respondent, whereas for 924 subjects, a surrogate was the primary respondent. MEASUREMENTS: Shortly after hospital admission, patients or surrogates reported whether the patient was independent in each of five activities of daily living (ADLs) on admission and at baseline 2 weeks before admission. Outcome measures included reported independence in each ADL 3 months after the hospitalization and survival to 1 year. RESULTS: Patients' retrospective reports of their ADL function 2 weeks before admission had a clinically plausible relationship with ADL function at the time of admission, in that patients independent in an ADL on admission rarely reported they were dependent in that ADL 2 weeks before admission (range 2-6%). Surrogates were somewhat more likely than patients to report that patients independent on admission were dependent 2 weeks before admission (range 5-14%). Retrospective reports of prehospitalization ADL function demonstrated strong evidence of predictive validity for both patients' and surrogates' reports. For example, among patients dependent in bathing on admission, patients who were reported as independent 2 weeks before admission were much more likely than those reported as dependent 2 weeks before admission to be independent 3 months after hospitalization (68% vs 20%, P < .001 for patient respondents; 30% vs 5%, P < .001 for surrogate respondents). Similarly, among patients dependent in bathing on hospital admission, survival 1 year after hospitalization was much higher in patients who were independent in bathing 2 weeks before admission than patients who were dependent 2 weeks before admission (76% vs 59%, P < .001 for patient respondents; 60% vs 45%, P < .001 for surrogate respondents). Results were similar for each of the other four ADLs. In a logistic regression model controlling for the number of ADLs reported as dependent on admission, the number of ADLs reported as dependent 2 weeks before admission was significantly associated with 1-year mortality among both patient (odds ratio (OR) = 1.39 per dependent ADL, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 1.26-1.54) and surrogate (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.06-1.24) respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients' assessments of their ability to perform ADLs before their hospitalization have evidence of face and predictive validity. These measures are strong predictors of important health outcomes such as functioning and survival. In particular, among patients dependent in ADL function on hospital admission, these results highlight the prognostic importance of inquiring about the patient's functional status before the onset of the acute illness.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2004

The identification of seniors at risk screening tool: further evidence of concurrent and predictive validity.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the validity of the Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) screening tool for detecting severe functional impairment and depression and predicting increased depressive symptoms and increased utilization of health services. SETTING: Four university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal. DESIGN: Data from two previous studies were available: Study 1, in which the ISAR scale was developed (n=1,122), and Study 2, in which it was used to identify patients for a randomized trial of a nursing intervention (n=1,889 with administrative data, of which 520 also had clinical data). PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 65 and older who were to be released from an emergency department (ED). MEASUREMENTS: Baseline validation criteria included premorbid functional status in both studies and depression in Study 2 only. Increase in depressive symptoms at 4-month follow-up was assessed in Study 2. Information on health services utilization during the 5 months after the ED visit (repeat ED visits and hospitalization in both studies, visits to community health centers in Study 2) was available by linkage with administrative databases. RESULTS: Estimates of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for concurrent validity of the ISAR scale for severe functional impairment and depression ranged from 0.65 to 0.86. Estimates of the AUC for predictive validity for increased depressive symptoms and high utilization of health services ranged from 0.61 to 0.71. CONCLUSION: The ISAR scale has acceptable to excellent concurrent and predictive validity for a variety of outcomes, including clinical measures and utilization of health services.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2005

Validity of the SF-36 five-item Mental Health Index for major depression in functionally impaired, community-dwelling elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES: To examine criterion and construct validity of the five-item Mental Health Index (MHI-5) of the 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36) in relation to the presence of major depression in functionally impaired, community-dwelling elderly patients and of eight subsamples defined by cognitive functioning, levels of functional impairment, and proxy report versus self-report. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational. SETTING: Nineteen counties in western New York, West Virginia, and Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand four hundred forty-four functionally impaired, community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older who participated in the Medicare Primary and Consumer-Directed Care Demonstration. MEASUREMENTS: MHI-5, Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview Major Depressive Episode (MINI-MDE) module. RESULTS: The MHI-5 demonstrated sufficient criterion validity (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.837; sensitivity=78.7% and specificity=72.1% using a cutpoint of 59/60) with respect to the presence of depression for the entire sample. A significant correlation between MHI-5 scores and presence of major depression as identified using the MINI-MDE (Spearman correlation=-0.426, P<.001), a strong correlation between the MHI-5 and the SF-36 role emotional scale (Spearman correlation=0.522) and a weak correlation with the SF-36 physical functioning scale (Spearman correlation=0.133) provided evidence for construct validity. Additional evidence is provided by decline in mean MHI-5 score as level of formal education and number of close friends and relatives decreased. All eight subsamples demonstrated similar criterion and construct validity. A Cronbach alpha of 0.794 demonstrated internal consistency reliability. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence for adequate criterion and construct validity of the MHI-5 in relation to the presence of major depression among functionally impaired, community-dwelling elderly Medicare patients.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2005

Challenges facing validation of noninvasive electrical imaging of the heart.

Noninvasive imaging of regional cardiac electrophysiology remains an elusive target. Such imaging is still in its infancy, particularly in comparison to structural imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), x-ray computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound. We present an overview of noninvasive ECG imaging, and the challenges and successes of the various techniques across a range of applications. Unlike MRI and CT, reconstructing cardiac electrophysiology from remote body surface measurements is a highly ill-posed problem. We therefore first review the theoretical considerations and associated algorithms that are used to address this issue. We then focus on the important issue of validation, and review and contrast recent advances in this area. Efforts to validate ECG inverse procedures using a modeling-based approach are addressed first. We then discuss various experimental studies that have been conducted to provide appropriate data for robust validations. We present new data that are simultaneously recorded from dense arrays of electrodes on the epicardium and body surface of anesthetized pigs during sinus rhythm, ventricular pacing, and regional ischemia. These data have been obtained specifically to help validate inverse ECG procedures, and form a useful supplement to recent clinical validation studies. Finally, clinical applications and outstanding issues regarding noninvasive imaging of regional cardiac electrophysiology are addressed.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2000

Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument.

OBJECTIVES: Triage is the initial clinical sorting process in hospital emergency departments (EDs). Because of poor reproducibility and validity of three-level triage, the authors developed and validated a new five-level triage instrument, the Emergency Severity Index (ESI). The study objectives were: 1) to validate the triage instrument against ED patients' clinical resource and hospitalization needs, and 2) to measure the interrater reliability (reproducibility) of the instrument. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational cohort study of a population-based convenience sample of adult patients triaged during 100 hours at two urban referral hospitals. Validation by resource use and hospitalization (criterion standards) and reproducibility by blinded paired triage assignments compared with weighted kappa analysis were assessed. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-eight patients were enrolled; 45 were excluded due to incomplete evaluations. The resulting cohort of 493 patients was 52% female, was 26% nonwhite, and had a median age of 40 years (range 16-95); overall, 159 (32%) patients were hospitalized. Weighted kappa for triage assignment was 0.80 (95% CI = 0.76 to 0.84). Resource use and hospitalization rates were strongly associated with triage level. For patients in category 5, only one-fourth (17/67) required any diagnostic test or procedure, and none were hospitalized (upper confidence limit, 5%). Conversely, in category 1, one of twelve patients was discharged (upper confidence limit, 25%), and none required fewer than two resources. CONCLUSIONS: This five-level triage instrument was shown to be both valid and reliable in the authors' practice settings. It reproducibly triages patients into five distinct strata, from very high hospitalization/resource intensity to very low hospitalization/resource intensity.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Measuring quality of life in dyspeptic patients: development and validation of a new specific health status questionnaire: final report from the Italian QPD project involving 4000 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the fact that gastrointestinal disorders represent one of the most common reasons for medical consultations, formal assessment of patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has been carried out only in a few studies, and in most cases generic questionnaires have been adopted. Because the specific issue of living with dyspeptic problems has been addressed in very few cases and no questionnaire has been shown to be appropriate for the Italian setting, a prospective project was launched to develop a specific HRQOL questionnaire for dyspepsia sufferers tailored to Italian patients but also appropriate in other cultural settings. METHODS: The project consisted in a 3-yr, three-phase survey, in which different versions of the quality of life in peptic disease questionnaire (QPD) were developed through expert and patient focus groups and empiric field studies and then administered to patients recruited in five multicenter studies. Standard psychometric techniques were used to evaluate the validity, reliability, responsiveness, and patient acceptability of the QPD. RESULTS: Three different versions of the QPD questionnaire were self-administered to more than 4000 patients. The final 30-item version, measuring three health concepts related to dyspeptic disease (anxiety induced by pain, social restriction, symptom perception), fulfilled the recommended psychometric criteria in terms of reliability and validity, correlated with health concepts measured with a well-known independent generic HRQOL instrument (the SF-36 Health Survey questionnaire) and was relatively invariant to diagnosis and sociodemographic variables; it also correlated with a measure of gastric pain frequency and was able to detect meaningful differences over time. CONCLUSIONS: Although further validation studies in different cultural and linguistic settings are mandatory before any firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the cross-cultural validity of the QPD, the data obtained provide evidence of the psychometric validity and robustness of the questionnaire when used in a fairly large, well-characterized population of Italian dyspeptic patients.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Validity of a new quality of life scale for functional dyspepsia: a United States multicenter trial of the Nepean Dyspepsia Index.

OBJECTIVE: The lack of a suitable disease-specific, health-related quality of life instrument for dyspepsia prompted the development of the Nepean Dyspepsia Index (NDI). The utility of the NDI in functional dyspepsia is unknown. We aimed to assess the validity of this new quality of life instrument for the first time in United States patients with documented functional dyspepsia. METHODS: The long form of the NDI contains a symptom index and 42 items designed to measure impairment of subjects' ability to engage in and to enjoy relevant aspects of their life because of dyspepsia, as well as a ranking of the individual importance of each aspect. Patients (n = 101, mean age 51 yr, 62% female) who had a history of functional dyspepsia for > or = 1 month and a negative endoscopy within the prior 1 yr were followed for 14 days. Patients completed the NDI and the validated Speilberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, Short Form-36, and a global assessment of symptoms and quality of life at baseline and 14 days later; the NDI was also retested at 48 h and 2 wk. RESULTS: Five clinically relevant factors (subscales), namely, tension/sleep, interference, eating/drinking, knowledge/control, and work/study were identified by factor analysis, after incorporating individual importance ratings (25 items total). All subscales had excellent face validity and internal consistency (Chronbach's alpha, all >0.85). Reliability was also excellent (intraclass correlations all >0.84). There were modest typically negative correlations between a number of the NDI subscales and the Short Form-36, anxiety, and depression, indicating that the NDI is disease-specific and supporting its validity. Changes in NDI scales correlated moderately with global assessment of change (total score r = -0.49), indicating initial responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The Nepean Dyspepsia Index is a valid, disease-specific index for functional dyspepsia, measuring symptoms and health-related quality of life.

Dyspepsia↗

PubMed2006

Respondent burden and patient-perceived validity of the PDQ-39.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the respondent burden and patient-perceived content validity of the Parkinson's disease (PD)-specific health status questionnaire PDQ-39, and the linguistic validity of its revised Swedish version. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen PD patients completed the revised Swedish version of the PDQ-39. Respondent burden was assessed by recording the time taken to complete the questionnaire. Content and linguistic validity was evaluated qualitatively. RESULTS: Patients with mild, moderate and advanced PD needed a mean time of 9.5, 11.3 and 20.1 min, respectively, to complete the PDQ-39. One-third of the patients identified irrelevant items and 50% identified important health-related areas that were missing. Revisions had eliminated previous linguistic problems with the Swedish PDQ-39. CONCLUSIONS: Undue respondent burden challenged the appropriateness of the PDQ-39 among patients with more advanced disease. Overall content validity was acceptable but compromised by lack of important content areas. Observations supported the linguistic validity of the revised Swedish PDQ-39.

Adult↗