PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Physical function”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,495 records · Page 83Linked to original sources

The injury impairment scale in pelvic and lower limb fractures sustained in road traffic accidents.

To assess the validity of the Injury Impairment Scale for pelvic and lower limb fractures sustained in road traffic accidents, the Expected Injury Impairment Scale score was correlated with the Observed Injury Impairment Scale score for patients who attended the Accident and Emergency department in Nottingham during 1992 and 1993. Seventy-four per cent of the patients had an Observed IIS score equivalent to their Expected IIS score. The validity of the observed IIS scores for mobility and pain were assessed by correlating them with: (a) Functional assessment and visual pain scale scoring systems. A significant difference was found between scores 0 and 1 for both mobility and pain and between scores 1 and 2 for mobility only. (b) The physical functioning and pain parts of the Short Form 36 (SF36) disability questionnaire. A significant difference was found between scores 0 and 1 for both mobility and pain and between scores 1 and 2 for mobility only. The level of impairment was compared with the level of disability for mobility using the functional assessment score and the physical functioning part of the SF36 and for pain using the visual pain scale score and the pain part of the SF36 and no statistically significant relation was found. This study does not validate the IIS for pelvic and lower limb fractures. However, minor modifications would make it a valid and useful method for predicting the outcome of these injuries.

Accidents, Traffic↗

[Changes of physical and functional characteristics in soccer players].

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to examine the trends in selected physical cardiovascular and metabolic variables in 248 first division professional soccer players within a period of 27 years (1973-2000). METHOD: In a cross sectional study (panel) 198 Mexican players and 50 mainly from Brazil and Argentina were evaluated for physical examination, body composition, blood samples, EKG and maximal oxygen uptake on a treadmill. Data were categorized by decade (70's n = 66, 80's n = 84 and 90's n = 98) and analyzed for significant differences by ANOVAS (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Value are presented in mean +/- standard deviation in chronological order. Age (years) 24 +/- 2, 26 +/- 2 and 27 +/- 3*. Weight (kg) 74 +/- 4, 73 +/- 4 and 74 +/- 5. Height (cm) 173 +/- 4, 175 +/- 4 and 176 +/- 5*. Body fat (%) 15 +/- 4, 12 +/- 4& and 10 +/- 4#*. Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 246 +/- 26, 220 +/- 24 and 198 +/- 20*. Triglycerides (mg/dL) 172 +/- 24, 190 +/- 26 and 147 +/- 24*#. Resting heart rate (bpm) 66 +/- 6, 60 +/- 4& and 54 +/- 5*#. VO2 max (mL.kg-1.min-1) 52 +/- 3, 54 +/- 2 and 57 +/- 2*. (& = p < 0.05 70's vs. 80's, * = p < 0.05 70's vs. 90's, # = p < 0.05 80's vs. 90's). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that soccer players performing in the 90's are older and taller, lower body fat, lower blood in lipids profile, and higher cardiovascular fitness than those performing in the decade 70's and 80's. In particular these findings might be related to the improvement at international setting of the South American and Mexican soccer level. Despite the favorable changes and the personal claim of great skill in these players more physiological gains must be aimed and acquired in order to compete in similar circumstances with national teams of superior international levels.

Adult↗

Levels of disability among U.S. adults with arthritis.

This article studies the excess levels of disability experienced by persons with arthritis, compared to persons without the disease. The data set is the Supplement on Aging (1984 National Health Interview Survey); it has information for a national probability sample of community-dwelling persons ages 55 + (N = 16,148). (1) Arthritis people have more difficulty in physical functions, personal care, and household care than do nonarthritis persons. The excess disability is greatest for physical functions (walking, reaching, stooping, etc.). Disabled arthritis people have especially high degrees of difficulty in physical activities that require endurance and strength. (2) Various models are tested for walking, grasping, shopping, and light housework to show how comorbidity propels disability for arthritis people and to show arthritis' own contribution to disability in the presence of other chronic conditions. Difficulties escalate for arthritis people when they have other concurrent conditions. These models affirm that arthritis has a pronounced effect on physical dysfunctions, but these are not readily translated into personal and household care problems. Apparently, arthritis people often make successful accommodations so their roles and daily activities are not seriously affected by the disease.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Impact of waiting time on the quality of life of patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND: A lack of resources has created waiting lists for many elective surgical procedures within Canada's universal health care system. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the treatment of atherosclerotic ischemic heart disease is one of these affected surgical procedures. We studied the impact of waiting times on the quality of life of patients awaiting CABG. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 266 patients from 3 hospitals in Montreal was used. Patients who gave informed consent were followed from the time they were registered for CABG until 6 months after surgery; recruitment began in November 1993, and the last follow-up was completed in July 1995. Patient groups were classified according to the duration of the wait for CABG (< or = 97 days or > 97 days). We measured the following outcomes: quality of life (using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form [SF-36]), incidence of chest pain (using the New York Heart Association angina classification), frequency of symptoms (using the Cardiac Symptom Inventory) and rates of complications and death before and after surgery. RESULTS: There were no differences in quality of life at baseline between the 2 groups. Immediately before surgery, compared with patients who waited 97 days or less, those who waited longer had significantly reduced physical functioning (change from baseline SF-36 score 0 v. -4 respectively, p = 0.001), vitality (change from baseline score -0.1 v. -1.3, p = 0.01), social functioning (change from baseline score 0.4 v. -0.4, p = 0.03) and general health (change from baseline score 1.1 v. -1.7, p = 0.001). At 6 months after surgery, compared with patients who waited 97 days or less for CABG, those who waited longer had reduced physical functioning (change from baseline SF-36 score 4.0 v. -0.1 respectively, p = 0.001), physical role (change from baseline score 0.8 v. 0.0, p = 0.001), vitality (change from baseline score 2.2 v. 0.9, p = 0.001), mental health (change from baseline score 1.2 v. 0.0, p = 0.001) and general health (change from baseline score 1.8 v. -0.3, p = 0.001). The incidence of postoperative adverse events was significantly greater among the patients with longer waits for CABG than among those with shorter waits (32 v. 14 events respectively, p = 0.005). Longer waits before CABG were associated with an increased likelihood of not returning to work after surgery (p = 0.08): 10 (53%) of the 19 patients with longer waiting times remained employed after CABG, as compared with 17 (85%) of the 20 with shorter waiting times. INTERPRETATION: The significant decrease in physical and social functioning, both before and after surgery, for patients waiting more than 3 months for CABG is an important observation. Longer waiting times were also associated with increased postoperative adverse events. By decreasing waiting times for CABG, we may improve patients' quality of life and decrease the psychological morbidity associated with CABG.

Comorbidity↗

Functional fitness: maintaining or improving function for elders with chronic diseases.

OBJECTIVE: This study's objective was to prove or disprove four hypotheses, three addressing physical function and a subjective measure of self-perceived well-being from participating in an elder functional fitness program. METHODS: Participants included 17 chronically ill residents from an assisted-living center in Maine. Measures on mobility, metabolic equivalent estimation (MET) levels, resting heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, muscular strength, flexibility, and body weight were conducted at three intervals-baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. SAS software was used for analysis of means and paired t test. RESULTS: Increases in or maintenance of function proved significant. The subjective hypothesis also proved significant. DISCUSSION: Research on elder exercise focuses on one or two components, rather than the benefits of a thorough fitness program. This study illustrated improvements in physical function and well-being from participating in a comprehensive elder fitness program.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Self-reported and performance-based functional status and associated factors among elderly men: the Finnish cohorts of the Seven Countries Study.

Health and functional status were studied in 470 men aged 70-89, the survivors of the Finnish cohorts of the Seven Countries Study. We aimed to compare subjective (self-reported activity of daily living [ADL]) and objective methods (four physical performance tests) in the assessment of physical function and to identify which factors are related to physical function. Poor ADL and decreased physical performance were mainly explained by the same health-related factors. The strongest determinants of ADL were depressive symptomatology odds ratio [OR] 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-8.8), osteoarthritis (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.8-5.9), vertigo (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.5) and diabetes (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.6). Self-reported ADL and performance-based measures were in general strongly correlated with each other, although there was some discordance owing to the fact that these performance tests examine functional limitations, whereas the self-reported ADL reflects disability. The choice of which measurement to use in assessing functional status should be based on research objectives and the type of population under study.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Prolonged adjustment difficulties among those with acute posttrauma distress following burn injury.

This study examined the impact of mild to moderate symptoms of in-hospital posttrauma distress (PTD) following severe burn injury on quality of life (QOL) at 2-month follow-up after controlling for preburn QOL, injury severity, and state Negative Affectivity (depression, body image dissatisfaction) and dispositional optimism-pessimism. Participants' (n = 86) self-report established PTD and non-PTD groups (median split on Davidson Trauma Scale). After covarying preburn level of psychosocial QOL, PTD groups differed on psychosocial functioning at follow-up. This effect remained after covarying injury severity, state NA, dispositional optimism-pessimism, and preburn Mental domain QOL. PTD groups also differed significantly on physical functioning at follow-up after covarying preburn physical functional status. This effect was removed by controlling preburn Physical domain QOL and either injury severity or state NA and dispositional optimism-pessimism. Therefore, PTD is related to significant impairments in the physical and psychosocial adjustment of survivors of severe burns regardless of pretrauma level of adjustment. Injury severity and state NA and dispositional optimism-pessimism moderate the impact of PTD on physical but not psychosocial adjustment.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Predictors of long-term change in functional status after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in women.

A cohort of 164 women who had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) was followed for one year to examine changes in functional status and determine the relative influence of clinical, psychosocial and sociodemographic factors on change in functional status outcomes between 6 and 12 months after surgery. Clinical, psychosocial, sociodemographic and preoperative functional status data were collected by written questionnaire and personal interview at the time of surgery and again at 6 and 12 months after CABG. Functional status scores improved significantly from before to 6 months after CABG. Between 6 and 12 months post-CABG 65% sustained or continued to experience improvement in physical functioning, 83% in social and leisure activities, and 54% in psychological functioning. Predictors of sustained improvement in physical functioning were being married, younger age, low 6-month functioning, having an ejection fraction of 50% or greater, and being white. The significant predictors of sustained improvement in social and leisure activities and psychological functioning were being married and low 6-month psychological functioning, respectively. These data suggest that interventions to improve long-term outcomes in women undergoing CABG should take into account not only their age, functional capacity and level of functioning at 6 months post-CABG, but also their race and marital status as potential risk factors for long-term functional status disability.

Age Factors↗

The Reconditioning Exercise and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Trial II (REACT II): rationale and study design for a clinical trial of physical activity among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the fourth leading cause of mortality in the United States. In addition, persons with COPD are at risk for lower levels of physical activity, leading to further morbidity and mortality. Several studies have demonstrated that long-term exercise therapy confers benefits upon physical functioning among patients with COPD, and some studies indicate that embedding cognitive-behavioral interventions into group-mediated exercise programs is useful in promoting compliance to activity recommendations. However, compliance to long-term activity is low among COPD patients, and the effectiveness of behavioral interventions to enhance long-term activity among these patients has not been extensively explored. Thus, the primary objective of the Reconditioning Exercise and COPD Trial II (REACT II) trial is to determine whether a group-mediated cognitive-behavioral intervention will result in increased physical activity after 12 months, compared to a standard exercise therapy experience among older adults with COPD. The cognitive-behavioral intervention is designed to promote independent physical activity by encouraging participants to self-regulate physical activity with minimal dependence upon staff. The primary study outcome is kcal expended per week in moderate physical activity, and the study is designed to provide 90% power to detect a 400 kcal/week difference in moderate energy expenditure between the two intervention groups. Other outcomes to be compared between the two interventions include physical function, self-reported physical disability, health-related quality of life, exercise capacity, body composition and inflammatory mediators.

Body Composition↗

Efficacy and tolerability of a standardized willow bark extract in patients with osteoarthritis: randomized placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial.

This study assessed the clinical efficacy of a chemically standardized willow bark extract in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Willow bark extract, in a dose corresponding to 240 mg salicin/day, was compared with placebo in a 2-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome measure was the pain dimension of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Secondary outcome measures included the stiffness and physical function dimensions of the WOMAC, daily visual analogue scales (VAS) on pain and physical function, and final overall assessments by both patients and investigators. A total of 78 patients (39 willow bark extract, 39 placebo) participated in the trial. A statistically significant difference between the active treatment and the placebo group was observed in the WOMAC pain dimension (d = 6.5 mm, 95% C.I. = 0.2-12.7 mm, p = 0.047); the WOMAC pain score was reduced by 14% from the baseline level after 2 weeks of active treatment, compared with an increase of 2% in the placebo group. The patient diary VAS confirmed this result, and likewise the final overall assessments showed superiority of the willow bark extract over the placebo (patients' assessment, p = 0.0002; investigators' assessment, p = 0.0073). It is concluded that the willow bark extract showed a moderate analgesic effect in osteoarthritis and appeared to be well tolerated.

Adult↗

[Effectiveness and tolerance of standardized willow bark extract in arthrosis patients. Randomized, placebo controlled double-blind study].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical efficacy of a chemically standardized willow bark extract in the treatment of osteoarthritis. METHODS: Willow bark extract, in a dose corresponding to 240 mg salicin/day, was compared to placebo in a 2-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome measure was the pain dimension of the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Secondary outcome measures included the stiffness and physical function dimensions of the WOMAC, daily visual analogue scales (VAS) on pain and physical function, and final overall assessment by both patients and investigators. RESULTS: 78 patients (39 willow bark extract, 39 placebo) participated in the trial. A statistically significant difference between active treatment and placebo group was observed in the WOMAC pain dimension (d = 6.5 mm, 95% C.I. = 0.2-12.7 mm, p = 0.047); the WOMAC pain score was reduced by 14% from baseline level after two weeks of active treatment, compared to an increase of 2% in the placebo group. Patient diary VAS confirmed this result, and likewise the final overall assessments showed superiority of willow bark extract over placebo (patients assessment, p = 0.0002; investigators assessment, p = 0.0073). CONCLUSION: Willow bark extract shows a moderate analgesic effect in osteoarthritis.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Assessment of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: reliability and functionality of the Turkish version of the Boston Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a Turkish version of the Boston Questionnaire and assess its reliability and validity. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome were included in the study. The Turkish version of Boston Questionnaire was obtained after translation process, and was then administered to subjects twice within seven days. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation), and reproducibility. Validity was examined by correlating the Boston Questionnaire scores to general health status (Short Form-36), pain severity (Visual Analogue Scale) and pinch and grip strength measures. RESULTS: Reliability of the Turkish version was very good, with high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.82 for symptom severity scale, and 0.88 for functional status scale), and reproducibility (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.60 for symptom severity scale, and 0.77 for functional status scale). The Boston Questionnaire scores were correlated with Visual Analogue Scale, physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain and emotional role subscales of Short Form-36, pinch and grip strength scores to obtain coefficients for external construct validity. CONCLUSION: Adaptation of the Boston Questionnaire for use in Turkey was successful. Our results seem to support previous finding of the English version, indicating that it is valid and reliable.

Adult↗

The prognostic value of quality of life scores during treatment for oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QL) data are useful to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment. Accumulating evidence suggests that QL data may predict survival. AIMS: In this study we investigated if baseline QL scores and changes in QL scores before and after intervention are prognostic for patients with oesophageal cancer. PATIENTS: Between 1993 and 1995, 92 consecutive new patients with oesophageal cancer were studied; 89 were followed until death or the end of the study period (survival of seven patients was censored in May 1999). METHODS: All patients completed the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the dysphagia scale of the oesophageal module (EORTC QLQ-OES24) before treatment and at regular intervals throughout the study. Cox's proportional hazards models assessed the impact of baseline QL variables and changes in QL scores on survival. RESULTS: Cox's proportional hazards models, adjusting for associations between QL scores, age, and TNM stage, found that physical function at baseline was significantly associated with survival (p=0.002). An increase in physical function score of 10 points corresponded to a 12% reduction in the likelihood of death at any given time (95% confidence intervals 4--18%). Further exploratory multivariable analyses suggested that improvement in emotional function six months after treatment was significantly related to longer survival (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence to support a relationship between patient rated scores of QL and survival. Further understanding of the associations between QL and clinical variables is needed.

Adult↗

The SF36 as an outcome measure of services for end stage renal failure.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the short form 36 (SF36) as a measure of health related quality of life of patients with end stage renal failure, document the results, and investigate factors, including mode of treatment, which may influence it. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey of patients with end stage renal failure, with the standard United Kingdom version of the SF36 supplemented by specific questions for end stage renal failure. SETTING: A teaching hospital renal unit. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 660 patients treated at the Sheffield Kidney Institute by haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and transplantation. Internal consistency, percentage of maximal or minimal responses, SF36 scores, effect sizes, correlations between independent predictor variables and individual dimension scores of the SF36. Multiple regression analysis of the SF36 scores for the physical functioning, vitality, and mental health dimensions against treatment, age, risk (comorbidity) score, and other independent variables. RESULTS: A high response rate was achieved. Internal consistency was good. There were no floor or ceiling effects other than for the two "role" dimensions. Overall health related quality of life was poor compared with the general population. Having a functioning transplant was a significant predictor of higher score in the three dimensions (physical functioning, vitality, and mental health) for which multiple regression models were constructed. Age, sex, comorbidity, duration of treatment, level of social and emotional support, household numbers, and hospital dialysis were also (variably) significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: The SF36 is a practical and consistent questionnaire in this context, and there is evidence to support its construct validity. Overall the health related quality of life of these patients is poor, although transplantation is associated with higher scores independently of the effect of age and comorbidity. Age, comorbidity, and sex are also predictive of the scores attained in the three dimensions studied. Further studies are required to ascertain whether altering those predictor variables which are under the influence of professional carers is associated with changes in health related quality of life, and thus confirm the value of this outcome as a measure of quality of care.

Data Collection↗

A prospective study of changes in patients' quality of life after aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: After aortic valve replacement (AVR), 90% of survivors are in NYHA class I or II, and most return to work after three months. It is unclear, however, whether at that time patients have an improved quality of life (QOL), are able to perform physical and social activities, and live independently. METHODS: To assess this situation, 62 patients (39 males, 23 females; mean age 68.5 +/- 10 years) who underwent primary AVR completed the validated Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. QOL parameters were determined before and three months after surgery prospectively, and analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched pairs rank test. RESULTS: All patients showed significant improvement in all eight QOL parameters (score 0-100): (i) physical function (67 +/- 26 versus 37 +/- 28; p <0.00001); (ii) role limitation due to physical function (52 +/- 43 versus 20 +/- 37; p <0.0001); (iii) social function (80 +/- 25 versus 59 +/- 30; p <0.0001); (iv) role limitation due to emotional problems (64 +/- 41 versus 41 +/- 46; p = 0.01); (v) energy (62 +/- 22 versus 42 +/- 23; p <0.00001); (vi) mental health (78 +/- 19 versus 63 +/- 22; p <0.00001); (vii) pain (78 +/- 27 versus 67 +/- 32; p = 0.02); and (viii) general health perception (72 +/- 20 versus 58 +/- 21; p <0.00001). Significant improvements in QOL parameters were: (i) after mechanical and bioprosthetic AVR, seven of eight QOL parameters were improved; (ii) patients aged < 70 years had pronounced improvement in six of seven parameters, while those aged > or = 70 years had limited improvement in five of eight parameters; (iii) patients with valve sizes 19 and 21 mm improved in five of eight parameters, while those with > or = 23 mm implants improved in all eight parameters, regardless of post-AVR peak gradient of < 20 or > or = 20 mmHg; and (iv) patients with left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) < 55 mm improved in all eight parameters while those with LVEDD > or = 55 mm improved in only five parameters. CONCLUSION: There was significant improvement in patients' QOL at three months after AVR, regardless of the type of aortic implant used; improvement was greatest in those aged < 70 years. The results also suggest that patients with smaller implants (who were older) and those with LVEDD > or = 55 mm were less likely to show significant improvement in all QOL parameters at three months after AVR.

Adult↗

The effects of a discharge information intervention on recovery outcomes following coronary artery bypass surgery.

This quasi-experimental study tested the effects of a discharge information intervention on physical and psychological outcomes 1 month following coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Recovery outcomes were compared between two groups of patients: those receiving an audiotape of information focusing on expected physical symptoms and their management in addition to usual care, and those receiving a usual cardiac discharge information protocol. The nonprobability sample of 82 patients were men and women and had a mean age of 64 years. The outcome measurements included psychological distress, measured by the Profile of Mood States, and physical functioning, measured by the Sickness Impact Profile. The audiotape intervention produced positive effects on physical functioning [F(1,80) = 6.37, p < 0.01]; the effects were maintained when age and post-operative length of stay were statistically controlled. No differences in psychological distress were found. Findings suggest that audiotapes containing discharge information about expected recovery experiences are a feasible and effective approach to enhancing the physical recovery of CABG patients.

Activities of Daily Living↗

The M.D.R. index of function in rheumatoid arthritis.

The M.D.R. index is a new instrument which has been designed to give a measurement of physical function in inflammatory joint disease. It is very easy to apply and is not time-consuming. In preliminary assessment, the index has proven to be highly reliable. It has also been sufficiently sensitive to detect short-term changes in functional capacity which were unrelated to changes in the severity of joint inflammation. The application of the index is inexpensive and does not require extensive training of personnel for its accurate use. It is expected that the M.D.R. index will prove to be suitable for widespread use as a clinical assessment of physical function.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Physical and sensory functioning over time and satisfaction with care: the implications of getting better or getting worse.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether those persons whose sensory or physical functioning improved or worsened over one year are more or less satisfied with their health care. DATA SOURCES: 1996 and 1997 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS). STUDY DESIGN: The MCBS surveys a nationally representative, longitudinal panel of Medicare beneficiaries about their sociodemographic attributes; vision, hearing, and various mobility functions; and 10 items representing satisfaction with and access to health care. Using multivariable logistic regression and controlling for sociodemographic factors, we computed adjusted odds ratios of dissatisfaction with care, examining the effects of changes in sensory or physical functioning. Analyses accounted for MCBS sampling weights. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We identified 9,974 community-dwelling respondents, 18 years old and over who answered the 1996 and 1997 MCBS. We assessed five categories of sensory or physical functioning (vision; hearing; walking; reaching overhead; and grasping and writing) and compared 1996 and 1997 responses to identify those whose functioning improved or worsened. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Worsened functioning was strongly associated with older age, low income, and low educational attainment. Improved functioning was rarely significantly associated with satisfaction; an exception involved substantially lower rates of dissatisfaction with "ease and convenience" of getting to physicians. Worsened functioning was often statistically significantly associated with dissatisfaction, always with adjusted odds ratios >1.0. Across all five functional categories, persons whose functioning worsened displayed significantly greater dissatisfaction with overall quality, ease, and costs or care. CONCLUSIONS: Persons whose functioning improved rarely reported better satisfaction than did those whose functioning did not improve, while those whose functioning worsened expressed more systematic reservations about their care.

Activities of Daily Living↗