SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Meta- analysis”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,549 records · Page 86Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Primary versus delayed wound closure in complicated appendicitis: an international systematic review and meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study was to determine, by means of a systematic review, whether the method of wound closure in complicated appendicitis affects the incidence of wound infection. A comprehensive literature search of multiple databases including MEDLINE (1980-2003), was performed, using the Cochrane search strategy, for articles on wound closure and complicated appendicitis. Clinical trials examining the method of wound closure were selected for systematic review and all quasi-randomized and randomized trials underwent meta-analysis. Failure to close the wound as planned in delayed closure (DC) was considered indicative of a wound infection. Purulent drainage requiring wound opening indicated an infection in the wounds closed primarily. Six randomized trials were considered adequate for meta-analysis. None independently showed a statistically significant difference in the risk of developing a wound infection with primary closure (PC). When pooled data were subjected to meta-analysis, PC achieved a statistically significant reduction in the relative risk of treatment failure and did not lead to an increase in wound infections. Primary closure does not increase the risk of developing a wound infection after operation for perforated appendicitis. Given the lack of benefit of DC, and the less traumatic, less painful, and less costly nature of PC; primary closure is a safe and practical treatment option.

Appendicitis↗

PubMed2026

Risk Factors for Long-Term Health-Related Quality-of-Life and Mental Health Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often leads to long-term disability, including persistent mental health issues and lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Early interventions can improve recovery, but because resources limit routine monitoring of all patients, trauma care remains largely symptom-driven. The combination of long-term disability and limited capacity for routine follow-up highlights the need for risk-stratified follow-up care and reliable evidence on early prognostic factors. However, the existing literature is sparse and methodologically heterogeneous, limiting the clinical applicability of findings. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify early risk factors for poorer long-term mental health and HRQoL outcomes. A systematic search of seven electronic databases identified studies of adult patients with TBI, with outcomes assessed at least 6 months postdischarge. Two authors independently screened the studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted the data. We pooled effect estimates using a random-effects meta-analysis and calculated 95% prediction intervals. A narrative synthesis was applied when meta-analysis was not feasible. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024576912) and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Of the 8,104 articles screened, 64 studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 334,672). Most studies (58%) had a low risk of bias. Female sex, socioeconomic disadvantage, psychiatric history, assaultive-related injuries, and previous TBI were consistently associated with worse long-term outcomes. Across meta-analyses, assault-related injuries more than doubled the odds of post-traumatic stress disorder (odds ratio [OR] = 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.01-3.66, I2 = 0%). Higher odds were also observed among females (OR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.11-1.59, I2 = 0%), individuals with prior TBI (OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.07-2.27, I2 = 0%), and those with psychiatric history (OR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.83-3.10, I2 = 48%). We found that female sex (OR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.38-2.16, I2 = 58%), prior TBI (OR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.25-1.85, I2 = 0%), and psychiatric history (OR = 3.25; 95%CI: 1.86-5.69, I2 = 98%) were associated with higher odds of depression. Furthermore, higher pooled anxiety scores were observed in females and in individuals with a psychiatric history. The study identified several readily available factors present before or at discharge that are associated with poor long-term HRQoL and mental health outcomes. Leveraging these factors in follow-up protocols, prediction modeling, and clinical decision support systems may facilitate risk-stratified postdischarge care for TBI patients.

Humans↗

PubMed1996

Meta-analysis with longitudinal studies: controlling for analytical bias.

A recent study published in an international medical journal presented an opportunity to demonstrate the difficulties of interpreting meta-analysis results with longitudinal data. We conducted a new meta-analysis using identical data from the published study and showed contradictory results.

Bias↗

PubMed2006

Meta-analysis of structural imaging findings in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

BACKGROUND: Although there are many structural neuroimaging studies of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, there are inconsistencies across studies and no consensus regarding which brain regions show the most robust area or volumetric reductions relative to control subjects. Our goal was to statistically analyze structural imaging data via a meta-analysis to help resolve these issues. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases through January 2005. Studies must have been written in English, used magnetic resonance imaging, and presented the means and standard deviations of regions assessed. Data were extracted by one of the authors and verified independently by another author. RESULTS: Analyses were performed using STATA with metan, metabias, and metainf programs. A meta-analysis including all regions across all studies indicated global reductions for ADHD subjects compared with control subjects, standardized mean difference=.408, p<.001. Regions most frequently assessed and showing the largest differences included cerebellar regions, the splenium of the corpus callosum, total and right cerebral volume, and right caudate. Several frontal regions assessed in only two studies also showed large significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides a quantitative analysis of neuroanatomical abnormalities in ADHD and information that can be used to guide future studies.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗

PubMed1992

Ventricular enlargement in schizophrenia. A meta-analysis of studies of the ventricle:brain ratio (VBR)

Multivariate meta-analysis was performed on 39 studies of ventricular size in schizophrenia which used the ventricle:brain ratio (VBR). The size of the VBR was dependent both upon the date when studies were carried out (more recent studies showing a reduction in the difference between schizophrenics and controls), and upon the diagnostic criterion used in the studies. Methodological factors in study design seemed more important than the characteristics of the schizophrenic subjects, in determining the VBR. Our analysis suggests that there is a difference in VBR between schizophrenics and controls which would seem to be an indisputable characteristic of schizophrenia. However, the difference is smaller than has previously been thought, so that, although of undoubted theoretical interest in accounting for the aetiology of schizophrenia, it is probably too small to be of practical significance in diagnosis, or in the differentiation of subtypes.

Brain↗

PubMed2003

Meta-analysis: evaluation of adjuvant therapy after curative liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: To evaluate adjuvant modalities after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma using a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials. METHODS: In a first step, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was carried out. Sensitivity analyses after inclusion of non-randomized controlled trials were performed. Four therapeutic modalities were evaluated: pre-operative transarterial chemotherapy, post-operative transarterial chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy and a combination of systemic and transarterial chemotherapy. RESULTS: Only post-operative transarterial chemotherapy improved survival significantly at 2 years [difference, 22.8%; confidence interval (CI), 8.6-36.9%; P = 0.002] and 3 years (difference, 27.6%; CI, 8.2-47.1%; P = 0.005), and decreased the probability of no recurrence at 1 year (difference, 28.8%; CI, 16.7-40.8%; P < 0.001), 2 years (difference, 27.6%; CI, 8.2-47.1%; P = 0.005) and 3 years (difference, 28%; CI, 8.2-47.9%; P = 0.006). In a sensitivity analysis after inclusion of non-randomized controlled trials, post-operative transarterial chemotherapy still improved survival at 1 year (difference, 9.6%; CI, 0.8-18.3%; P = 0.03), 2 years (difference, 13.5%; CI, 0.9-26%, P = 0.04) and 3 years (difference, 18%; CI, 7-28.9%; P < 0.001), and decreased the probability of no recurrence at 1 year (difference, 20.3%; CI, 7.7-33%; P = 0.002), 2 years (difference, 35%; CI, 21.4-46.3%; P < 0.001) and 3 years (difference, 34.5%; CI, 18.7-50.3%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Post-operative transarterial chemotherapy improved survival and decreased the cumulative probability of no recurrence. New randomized controlled trials evaluating this modality are required.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Obesity Medications for Weight Loss Maintenance in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

AIMS: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-obesity medications (AOMs) for long-term weight maintenance following initial weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to 31 October 2025. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AOMs with placebo during the weight-maintenance phase in adults with overweight or obesity after initial weight loss achieved through lifestyle, dietary, surgical or pharmacological interventions. Outcomes included anthropometric indices, cardiometabolic measures, safety endpoints, quality of life and neuropsychiatric adverse events. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs), each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were pooled for continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively, using fixed-effect or random-effects models as appropriate. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261293040). RESULTS: A total of 12 RCTs comprising 4915 participants met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, AOM therapy during the weight-maintenance phase was associated with prevention of weight regain and additional improvements in anthropometric and cardiometabolic outcomes. AOMs led to further reductions in body weight (BW, WMD: -8.68 kg, 95% CI: -13.25 to -4.11), waist circumference (WC, WMD: -7.16 cm, 95% CI: -10.34 to -3.98) and body mass index (BMI, WMD: -3.58 kg/m2, 95% CI: -5.69 to -1.46). Additional benefits were observed for triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common with AOMs, whereas serious adverse events were not significantly increased. Neuropsychiatric adverse events were generally comparable between groups, and available quality-of-life measures favoured AOM treatment. CONCLUSIONS: AOM therapy during the weight-maintenance phase can help prevent weight regain, provide further reductions in body weight and improve cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with overweight or obesity. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common with AOMs, whereas serious adverse events were not significantly increased. Further long-term trials are needed to clarify optimal treatment strategies and safety.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Exercise and pathologic complete response to cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is a commonly recommended approach for treating several cancers, and improving patients' outcomes to this therapy is important. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the impact of exercise on pathologic complete response (pCR), a key short-term marker of treatment efficacy, in patients with solid tumors receiving NACT. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials with physical exercise during NACT as an intervention published until May 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0 and the TESTEX scale. A random-effect meta-analysis using the inverse variance method synthesized the results. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and chi2 statistics. Risk ratio estimated the effect size. RESULTS: Eight studies involving 504 patients with breast, esophageal, gastric, or rectal cancer were included in the final analysis. Exercise interventions consisted of aerobic and resistance exercise. Overall, there were no significant differences between exercise and control groups in the rate of pCR to NACT (pooled risk ratio: 1.08 (95% CI: 0.82 to 1.43) Z = 0.56, p = 0.58). However, meta-regression data from breast cancer (BC) studies (4 studies, 367 participants) suggest exercise may be associated with enhanced tumor response to NACT in HR + /HER2- subtypes (regression coefficient: 0.83 (95% CI: -0.00 to 1.67), p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Exercise during NACT did not improve pCR across cancer types. Exploratory meta-regression findings suggest a possible benefit of exercise in BC patients with the HR + /HER2- subtype. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies and low certainty of the evidence.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Worldwide prevalence of haemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhoidal disease (HD) is one of the most common anorectal disorders globally, significantly impacting individuals' quality of life and productivity. Despite its importance, global prevalence remains unclear due to limited population-specific studies. This study aimed to systematically assess the global prevalence of HD through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to March 31, 2025, without language restrictions. Studies reporting prevalence of haemorrhoids in general, clinical, or high-risk populations were included. Exclusion criteria comprised studies lacking total sample size, focusing on other anorectal conditions, or using duplicate or insufficient data. Four independent reviewers extracted and appraised study quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. The primary outcome was pooled point prevalence of HD, analyzed using a random-effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251045600). RESULTS: From 6,312 records, 150 studies (210 datasets) comprising 8,960,338 individuals were included. The global pooled point prevalence was 25.92% (95% CI: 22.62-29.22). Lifetime prevalence was 27.19% (95% CI: 14.77-39.60), and one-year prevalence was 21.65% (95% CI: 14.33-28.97). Prevalence was higher in women (27.33%, 95% CI: 21.84-32.82) than in men, and highest in the African region 28.07% (95% CI: 15.34-40.79). Invasive diagnostic methods (28.05%, 95% CI: 23.86-32.26) yielded higher prevalence estimates than non-invasive methods. Also, factors showing associations with HD in unadjusted analyses include older age, obesity, pregnancy, diabetes, family history, constipation, and hypertension. CONCLUSION: HD remains a prevalent condition globally, with minor variation across regions. The burden is consistent regardless of socioeconomic context. Diagnostic method and population characteristics influence prevalence estimates. These findings underscore the importance of targeted prevention and early intervention strategies, especially for at-risk groups.

Humans↗

PubMed1997

Economic implications of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in treatment of nonresectable colorectal liver metastases. Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of patients with colorectal cancer die of metastases confined to the liver. A meta-analysis recently performed by our group confirmed that in these patients hepatic arterial infusion of 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine, compared with intravenous chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines or supportive care (including symptom palliation when necessary), improved tumor response. PURPOSE: Because of the high cost of hepatic arterial infusion, we undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis that related the cost of such therapy to its medical efficacy. METHODS: The patient population was drawn from the seven randomized clinical trials included in the meta-analysis and included individual data on 654 patients. Of these seven trials, five compared hepatic arterial infusion and intravenous chemotherapy and two compared hepatic arterial infusion and a control group in which some patients could be left untreated. Patients assigned to receive hepatic arterial infusion made up the hepatic arterial infusion group; the other patients constituted the control group. The measures of efficacy were survival and tumor response. Health-care costs (in 1995 U.S. dollars) were computed over the duration of patient follow-up and were derived from actual costs in two centers, one at Henri Mondor Hospital (Paris, France) and the other at Stanford University Medical Center (Palo Alto, CA). The total cost of treatment included the initial procedure, chemotherapy cycles, and main complications. RESULTS: The mean gain in life expectancy in the hepatic arterial infusion group compared with the control group was 3.2 months (standard error = 1.0 month). For patients treated by hepatic arterial infusion in Paris, the hepatic arterial infusion pump, initial hospitalization, and the entire process (including follow-up and complications) cost, on average, $8400, $15172, and $29562, respectively; in Palo Alto, these costs were $4700, $13784, and $25 208, respectively. For patients in the control groups in Paris and Palo Alto, the total treatment costs were, on average, $9926 and $5928. The additional costs of hepatic arterial infusion over control treatment were $19636 in Paris and $19280 in Palo Alto. The cost-effectiveness (i.e., the additional cost divided by the additional benefit) with respect to survival of the patients in the hepatic arterial infusion group compared with the patients in the control group was $73635 per life-year in Paris and $72300 per life-year in Palo Alto. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The cost-effectiveness of localized chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases is within the range of accepted treatments for serious medical conditions, although it might be considered borderline by policy-makers in some countries. Prospective clinical trials should be conducted to more definitively answer this question.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed2003

A meta-analysis of four European genome screens (GIFT Consortium) shows evidence for a novel region on chromosome 17p11.2-q22 linked to type 2 diabetes.

Positional cloning is expected to identify novel susceptibility genes underlying complex traits, but replication of genome-wide linkage scan findings has proven erratic. To improve our ability to detect and prioritize chromosomal regions containing type 2 diabetes susceptibility genes, the GIFT consortium has implemented a meta-analysis of four scans conducted in European samples. These included the Botnia I and Botnia II scans, with respectively 58 and 353 pedigrees from Finland and Sweden, the Warren 2 scan performed in 573 multiplex sibships from the UK, and a scan of 143 families from France. The meta-analysis was implemented using the genome-search analysis method (GSMA), an exploratory data analysis technique which is robust across study designs. The analysis provided evidence for linkage of type 2 diabetes to six regions, with the strongest evidence on chromosome 17p11.2-q22 (P=0.0016), followed by 2p22.1-p13.2 (P=0.027), 1p13.1-q22 (P=0.028), 12q21.1-q24.12 (P=0.029), 6q21-q24.1 (P=0.033) and 16p12.3-q11.2 (P=0.033). Linkage analysis of the pooled raw genotype data generated maximum LOD scores in the same regions as identified by GSMA. Altogether, our results have indicated that GSMA is a valuable tool to identify chromosomal regions of interest and that accumulating evidence for linkage from small peaks detected across several samples may be more important than getting a high peak in a single sample. This meta-analysis has led to identification of a novel region on chromosome 17 linked to type 2 diabetes; this region has not been highlighted in any published scan to date but on the basis of these data justifies further exploration.

Chromosome Mapping↗

PubMed1997

Meta-analysis of the long-term effect of nifedipine for pulmonary hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertensive disorders generally result in a progressively worsening course associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Nifedipine therapy may provide an effective solution to attenuate the disease state. OBJECTIVE: To assess the magnitude and consistency of the effect of nifedipine on reducing pulmonary artery pressure in patients with pulmonary hypertensive disorders. DESIGN: A meta-analysis of 8 trials of nifedipine therapy. METHODS: Clinical trials were identified by a computerized literature search of MEDLINE and by an assessment of bibliographies of retrieved studies. Trials were selected if they measured the change in pulmonary artery pressures in their subjects after weeks to months of therapy. Eight of 25 conducted trials were selected for review. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 6 homogeneous trials demonstrated a significant decrease in pulmonary artery pressure: -7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -3 to -11 mm Hg; P < .01). Heterogeneity of trial results appeared to be due to differences in the severity of initial pulmonary artery pressures and to differences in the dosage of nifedipine rather than the type of disease state. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis of the trials of nifedipine therapy in patients with pulmonary hypertension demonstrated a decrease in pulmonary artery pressure that was associated with an amelioration of clinical symptoms. Because of the paucity of data, however, larger trials are needed to better define its clinical value.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

PubMed2002

Intravenous immunoglobulin G for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis.

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has several effects on the immune system that could have a beneficial influence on disease processes in multiple sclerosis (MS). Four double-blind trials in relapsing-remitting MS have demonstrated that IVIG may reduce the relapse rate, progression and the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions. However, these trials were smaller than the pivotal trials of interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate, and therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of the four trials in order to provide an overall assessment of the benefits of IVIG in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in comparison with other drugs currently available for treatment of disease activity in MS. The meta-analysis showed a significant beneficial effect on the annual relapse rate (effect size -0.5; P = 0.00003), on the proportion of relapse-free patients (0.29 difference; P = 2.1 x 10(-8)), change in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score (effect size: 0.25; P = 0.04), and a trend towards a reduction in the proportion of patients who deteriorated (P = 0.03). Each single study in the meta-analysis had its weaknesses, but all studies were positive regarding their primary end-point, and the results yield concordant evidence for reduction of relapse rate and progression. The ideal dosage of IVIG for treating MS needs still to be determined. In conclusion, IVIG may be a valuable alternative for treatment of relapsing-remitting MS, but can presently not be considered as a first-line treatment. IVIG could be considered in patients who do not tolerate or are unwilling to take the approved injectable medications, but additional studies are needed to establish the role of IVIG in the management of multiple sclerosis.

Persons with Disabilities↗

PubMed2002

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of tianeptine versus SSRI in the short-term treatment of depression.

A meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of tianeptine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) in the short-term treatment of depression. Consecutive selection and inclusion processes allowed five studies to be selected: two studies on tianeptine versus fluoxetine, two studies on tianeptine versus paroxetine, and one study on tianeptine versus sertraline. A total of 1348 patients were included in the five studies; 681 subjects received an SSRI and 667 tianeptine. A strict step-by-step methodology was applied in order to legitimize this meta-analysis and to interpret the results. Considering all the patients or those with a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) inclusion score greater than 28, none of the assessed parameters (MADRS total score and responder rate) revealed any significant difference between the two treatment groups. Further analysis based on clinical global impression (CGI) items found no significant difference, except for CGI item 3 (therapeutic index), where a tendency (P=0.06 or 0.07 depending on the methodology) was found in favor of tianeptine. All in all, this study confirmed that tianeptine is at least as effective as SSRI, with a trend for a better acceptability profile in the treatment of depressed patients.

Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic↗

PubMed2002

The role of EGF-R expression on patient survival in lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

The prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) for survival of patients with lung cancer remains controversial. The authors performed a systematic review of the literature in order to clarify its impact. Published studies were identified using an electronic search in order to aggregate the available survival results, after a methodological assessment using a scale specifically designed by the European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP). To be eligible, a study had to have dealt with EGF-R assessment in lung cancer patients on the primary site and to have analysed survival according to EGF-R expression. Among the 16 eligible studies, 14 assessed any nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtype, one adenocarcinoma only and one squamous-cell carcinoma only. The overall median quality score was 56.3%, with no significant difference either between studies assessable or not assessable for meta-analysis or between studies with significant and nonsignificant results. One individual trial reported a survival benefit for patients with EGF-R expression, three a survival disadvantage and 12 no statistically significant difference. Eleven studies (2,185 patients) provided sufficient data to allow a meta-analysis of the survival results. EGF-R expression positivity was determined according to the cut-off as determined by the authors. The meta-analysis showed that EGF-R expression was not a statistically significant prognostic factor for survival in NSCLC. In the subgroup of studies using immunohistochemistry, statistical tests reached a significant level against EGF-R. Epidermal growth factor receptor might be a poor prognostic factor for survival in nonsmall-cell lung cancer. The amplitude of the impact is small, however, and may be subject to publication bias.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1991

Drug misuse and psychopathology: a meta-analysis of 16PF research.

This report presents a meta-analysis of a series of published 16PF findings which describe score profiles of nine groups of substance users/abusers, a nonuser comparison group, seven psychiatric groups, a group of criminals, and a group of gang delinquents. Analytical procedures include K Means Clustering, Cattell's rp statistic, and Pearson r. Although drug use was found to be associated with various forms of psychiatric diagnoses, it was not found to be associated with any particular form of psychopathology. The 16PF profiles of groups of users of different substances were not homogeneous within groups. Some similarity, however, was found among profiles of alcoholics. No evidence could be found to support the contention that groups of substance abusers yield the particular profile pattern on the 16PF that was ascribed to them in an earlier meta-analyses. Due to the inadequacies of the 16PF in diagnosing psychiatric conditions, it is suggested that a more fruitful direction of future research might be to use Cattell's Clinical Analysis Questionnaire (CAQ).

Adult↗

PubMed2005

A meta-analysis on the interaction between HER-2 expression and response to endocrine treatment in advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Experimental data suggest a complex cross-talk between HER-2 and estrogen receptor, and it has been hypothesized that HER-2-positive tumors may be less responsive to certain endocrine treatments. Clinical data, however, have been conflicting. We have conducted a meta-analysis on the interaction between the response to endocrine treatment and the overexpression of HER-2 in metastatic breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Studies have been identified by searching the Medline, Embase, and American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract databases. Selection criteria were (a) metastatic breast cancer, (b) endocrine therapy (any line of treatment), and (c) evaluation of HER-2 expression (any method). For each study, the relative risk for treatment failure for HER-2-positive over HER-2-negative patients with 95% confidence interval was calculated as an estimate of the predictive effect of HER-2. Pooled estimates of the relative risk were computed by the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Twelve studies (n = 2,379 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall relative risk was 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.32-1.52; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.380). For studies involving tamoxifen, the pooled relative risk was 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.48; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.97); for studies involving other hormonal drugs, a pooled relative risk of 1.49 (95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.64; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.08) was estimated. A second meta-analysis limited to tumors that were either estrogen receptor positive, estrogen receptor unknown, or estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor positive yielded comparable results. CONCLUSIONS: HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer is less responsive to any type of endocrine treatment. This effect holds in the subgroup of patients with positive or unknown steroid receptors.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

PubMed2005

Evaluation of the effectiveness of imiquimod and 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of actinic keratosis: Critical review and meta-analysis of efficacy studies.

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratosis lesions occur frequently on sun-exposed skin of Caucasians. They become more prevalent with advancing age and are important in identifying the risk factor of those people possibly predisposed to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Topical therapies are useful alternatives to cryotherapy for treating diffuse actinic damage and a number of preparations have been developed for treating actinic keratosis. OBJECTIVES: A cumulative meta-analysis was performed to determine the efficacy of imiquimod 5% cream, which presents a new alternative topical therapy for actinic keratosis, and to compare it to 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of actinic keratosis lesions of the face and scalp. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (1966 to October 2004) for relevant studies evaluating the efficacy of actinic keratosis topical agents imiquimod and 5-fluorouracil (0.5%, 1%, and 5%). Studies included in this meta-analysis required a dosage regimen that was not significantly different from that approved by Health Canada and the U.S. FDA. Studies also required a well-defined treatment duration and followup period, with the primary efficacy variable being the complete (100%) clearance of all actinic keratosis lesions defined as the proportion of patients at followup with no clinically visible lesions in the treatment area. To determine the average efficacy rate for both drugs, the data from each study were combined for that drug. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the analysis. The average efficacy rate for each drug (with 95% confidence interval) was 5-fluorouracil, 52 +/- 18% (n = 6 studies, 145 subjects) and imiquimod, 70 +/- 12% (n = 4 studies, 393 subjects). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis show that both imiquimod and 5-fluorouracil are effective methods for the treatment of actinic keratosis and provide a useful alternative to cryotherapy. However, this analysis suggests that imiquimod may have higher efficacy than 5-fluorouracil for actinic keratosis lesions located on the face and scalp and therefore provides another option to dermatologists.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗