SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “construct validity”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,549 records · Page 86Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

The value of a continuous ambulatory activity monitor to quantify the amount and intensity of daily activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a continuous ambulatory activity monitor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Forty-one patients with RA, participating in a randomized controlled trial examining the effect of an intensive exercise program, were assessed by means of the Dynaport ADL (activities of daily living) monitor (AM). The time spent on activities (locomotion, standing, and active sitting) during 24 hours and the intensity of trunk movement during these activities were recorded. To determine test-retest reliability 20 patients were reassessed with the AM one week after the first assessment. Construct validity of the AM was determined by comparing the AM results with physical fitness measures (muscle strength, endurance, joint mobility), disease activity, and functional status. As well, 37 patients were assessed 18 months after the first assessment to determine responsiveness. RESULTS: All AM measurements showed satisfactory test-retest reliability (ICC 0.63-0.76). AM measures were significantly associated with physical fitness, functional status, and disease activity, indicating construct validity of the AM. The AM could discriminate between patients with improvement and deterioration in physical fitness, indicating sufficient responsiveness of AM variables. CONCLUSION: This study shows the value of an ambulatory activity monitor to quantify both the amount and intensity of physical activity of patients with RA during a day in their own environment. The ambulatory activity monitor seems to be a promising instrument for research into rehabilitation of patients with RA.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2003

Validation of a rheumatoid arthritis health-related quality of life instrument, the CSHQ-RA.

OBJECTIVE: To test the validity and reliability of a newly developed disease-specific multidimensional quality of life instrument: the Cedars-Sinai Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument (CSHQ-RA). METHODS: A total of 350 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients were asked to complete the CSHQ-RA at 2 time points (4 weeks apart). Patients also completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index (DI) at the second time point. Construct validity was tested, using Pearson's correlations, by comparing subscale scores on the CSHQ-RA to those obtained from the mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) of the SF-36. HAQ DI scores were used to assess the discriminant validity of the CSHQ-RA. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Response rates for the first and second survey were 83% (291) and 93% (276), respectively; 84% of respondents were women, and mean age was 57 years. Mean scores +/- SDs on instruments were: HAQ 0.73 +/- 0.69; MCS 49 +/- 12; and PCS 33 +/- 11. Pearson's correlations between the CSHQ-RA subscale scores and the SF-36 scores ranged from 0.55 to 0.76 (P < 0.001). Analysis of variance indicate that scores on the CSHQ-RA discriminated between levels of physical disability as measured by the HAQ (P < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was demonstrated in the instrument's subscale scores (ICC 0.70-0.90). CONCLUSION: These results support the construct validity, discriminant validity, and reliability of the CSHQ-RA as a measure that captures the impact of RA on patients' health-related quality of life.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

PubMed2004

Validation of the French version of the fear avoidance belief questionnaire.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational prospective study. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the French version of the Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Fear, avoidance attitudes, and belief play pivotal roles in disability perceived by patients with chronic low back pain. The Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire is a two-part questionnaire assessing fear, avoidance, and beliefs about professional activity and physical activity. METHODS: The Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire was translated by use of the forward and backward translation procedure. Test-retest reliability was assessed in 31 patients (Group 1) with the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Bland and Altman method. Construct validity was assessed in two groups of patients (Group 2, n = 147; Group 3, n = 70) with the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and factor analysis. Responsiveness was assessed in Group 3, after they underwent a functional restoration program, by the effect size and the standardized response mean. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was good, with an intra-class correlation coefficient value of 0.88 and 0.72 for fear, avoidance, and beliefs about professional activity and physical activity, respectively. Use of the Bland and Altman method produced a homogeneous distribution of the differences, with no systematic trend observed. The expected divergent validity was observed in Groups 2 and 3. Factor analysis extracted four factors in Group 2 and the two original factors of the English Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire in Group 3. The lowest effect size and standardized response mean values (0.30 and 0.31, respectively) were observed with the fear, avoidance, and beliefs about professional activity. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric properties (test-retest reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness) of the French version of the Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire are acceptable, and fear, avoidance, and belief can now be assessed in French-speaking patients with low back pain.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed2001

Improving the assessment of (in)patients' satisfaction with hospital care.

BACKGROUND: A self-report questionnaire is the most widely used method to assess (in)patients' satisfaction with (hospital) care. However, problems like nonresponse, missing values, and skewed score distributions may threaten the representativeness, validity, and reliability of results. We investigated which of alternative item-response formats maximizes desired outcomes. DESIGN: Five formats were compared on the basis of sample characteristics, psychometric properties at the scale and item levels, and patients' opinions of the questionnaire. SUBJECTS: Consecutively discharged patients (n=784) were sampled, of which a representative (sex, age, length of hospital stay) subsample of 514 (65%) responded. MEASURES: A 54-item satisfaction questionnaire addressing 12 aspects of care was used. Patients responded using either a 10-step evaluation scale ranging from "very poor" to "excellent" (E10), a 5-step evaluation scale ranging from "poor" to "excellent" (E5), or a 5-step satisfaction scale ranging from "dissatisfied" to "very satisfied" (S5). The 5-step scales were administered with response options presented as either boxed scale steps to be marked or words to be circled. RESULTS: E5 scales yielded lower means than S5 scales. However, at the item level, the S5 scale showed better construct validity, more variability, and less peaked score distributions. Circling words yielded fewer missing item scores than marking boxes. The E5 scale showed more desirable score distributions than the E10 scale, but construct validity and reliability were lower. CONCLUSIONS: No large differences among formats were found. However, if individual items are important carriers of information, a (5-step) satisfaction response scale, with response options presented in words next to each item, appears to be the optimal format.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Action (verb naming) fluency as an executive function measure: convergent and divergent evidence of validity.

Numerous studies have demonstrated dissociable neuroanatomic underpinnings for the retrieval of grammatical classes of words such as nouns and verbs. Whereas retrieval of common and proper nouns is primarily mediated by posterior and anterior temporal regions, respectively, verb retrieval is primarily mediated by frontal regions. The majority of studies evaluating verb production have utilized tasks requiring subjects to name a graphically depicted action (i.e. action naming), leaving tests of verb generation in the absence of prompting stimuli (i.e. action fluency) largely unexamined. In a recent study, Piatt, Fields, Paolo, Koller and Tröster (in press) found that an action fluency task discriminated demented Parkinson's disease (PD) patients from non-demented PD patients and healthy control subjects, whereas lexical and categorical fluency tasks did not. These authors suggested that action fluency was sensitive to the fronto-striatal pathophysiology associated with PD dementia, and thus, that action fluency might serve as an indicator of executive functioning. This study was undertaken to evaluate the construct validity of action fluency as an executive function measure in a group of healthy elderly control subjects. Findings revealed modest to moderate relationships between action fluency and several putative executive measures. Action fluency was unrelated to indices of semantic and episodic memory. Results support the construct validity of action fluency as an executive function measure and suggest that this task may provide some unique information not tapped by traditional executive function tasks.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Assessment of outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: an extended radiographic scoring system.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an extensive radiographic scoring system for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: The Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (SASSS) was modified by adding a score for the cervical spine and defining squaring. This modified SASSS (mSASSS) is the sum of the lumbar and cervical spine score (range 0-72). 370 lateral views of the lumbar and cervical spine were used for development of the mSASSS, standardisation of observers, and for studying reliability. In a 48 week NSAID study of 57 patients, change over time and construct validity were studied. RESULTS: Interobserver correlations of the lumbar and cervical spine scores were good (r>0.95). The interobserver duplicate error was 0.55 in a range from 0 to 36. The mean change in the cervical and lumbar spine scores between weeks 0 and 48 of all patients was 1.45 (range 0-6.0) and 1.06 (0-5.0), respectively (paired t testing, p<0.001). Change in radiological score was seen in 36/57 (63%) patients (lumbar and cervical spine 11, cervical spine 12, lumbar spine 13 patients). CONCLUSION: The mSASSS is useful for assessing extensive radiographic damage in AS. It is reliable, detects changes over 48 weeks, and shows a satisfactory face and construct validity.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed2004

The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): measurement properties.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST), version 2.4. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 298 subjects (169 wheelchair users, 129 able-bodied subjects) ranging in age from 17 to 88 years. INTERVENTION: We videotaped subjects as they attempted the 50 skills of the WST 2.4. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliabilities were determined on a subset of 20 wheelchair users. We assessed construct validity by evaluating whether the WST detected expected changes and concurrent validity by seeing how well total WST scores correlated with criterion measures. RESULTS: The mean time +/- standard deviation taken to administer the WST was 27.0+/-9.3 minutes. There were no serious adverse incidents, and the test was well tolerated. For the test-retest, intrarater and interrater reliabilities, the intraclass correlation coefficients for the total scores were.904,.959, and.968. For individual skills, the percentage concordance ranged from 73% to 100%. Regarding construct validity, there was a slightly negative Pearson correlation between total WST score and age (-.434). Gender was identified as a significant factor on multiple regression analysis (P<.001). Wheelchair users with more than 21 days of experience scored higher than those with less experience (65.0% vs 59.6%; P=.01). Participants with stroke and related disorders had a mean score (55.0%+/-13.9%) that was significantly lower than those in other diagnostic categories (P<.05). Participants using conventional wheelchairs had lower scores than those in lightweight ones (66.4% vs 75.1%; P<.001). Regarding concurrent validity, Spearman rank correlations between total WST scores and the global assessments of the wheelchair users' therapists and admission and discharge FIM instrument scores were.394,.38, and.31. CONCLUSIONS: The WST 2.4 is practical and safe, and its measurement properties are very good to excellent. Further study is needed to determine its usefulness in various clinical settings.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Validation of indices for functional assessment of dentures.

AIMS: To validate an assessment of qualities of complete dentures that may relate to functional success. SUBJECTS: A consecutive sample of 131 complete denture wearers took part in the study. SETTING: a Greek department of prosthetic dentistry. INTERVENTION: All participants and their dentures underwent clinical examination. DESIGN: The Functional Assessment of Dentures (FAD) 10-item criteria' describing clinical factors of denture quality was used. The rationale for selecting these particular criteria was to include a range of clinical factors to produce an overall assessment of complete dentures. The 10-item scale was examined for Internal Consistency and Construct Validity providing a summated rating scale whose total score could be used as an index for the quality of dentures. RESULTS: Both intra- and inter-examiner agreement for all 10 dichotomous scale criteria were all good or very good; the intra-examiner Kappa values were 0.72 to 0.91 and the inter- examiner values were 0.72 to 0.99. Statistical analysis revealed that a 7-item summated rating scale could be constructed which has marginally better internal consistency (reliability) and Construct Validity with fewer questions. CONCLUSIONS: The FAD criteria' can be used to give good repeatability. The adjustments made to the original summation scale, if confirmed by new studies, would further increase the practical utility of a FAD index for general dentists. In due course with data from future studies, discrimination on weighting of items will be appropriate to relate the impact of denture quality on quality of life.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Validity and responsiveness of the euroqol as a measure of health-related quality of life in people enrolled in an AIDS clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Brief utility measures are needed in clinical trials in addition to existing descriptive measures of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We examined the reliability and validity of the EuroQol (EQ-SD) and MOS-HIV and their responsiveness to HIV-related clinical events. METHODS: Subjects with advanced HIV disease (CD4 < 100) were enrolled in a randomized trial for CMV prophylaxis (n = 990). The EQ-5D includes a weighted sum of five domains (EQ-5D Index) and a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). The MOS-HIV has 10 subscales and physical (PHS) and mental health summary scores (MHS). Construct validity of the EQ-5D was tested based on hypothesized relationships to subscales of the MOS-HIV. Relative precision and responsiveness to adverse experiences and opportunistic infections (Ols) were compared for the two instruments. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 38, 94% were male, 80% white, and 7% had injected drugs. Mean baseline scores for EQ-5D Index and EQ-VAS were 0.80 and 76.0, respectively, 28 and 4% reported maximum scores. Mean MOS-HIV subscales score ranged from 55 (role) to 84 (cognitive); mean PHS and MHS were 47.4 and 49.5, respectively. Correlations between MOS-HIV subscales and EQ-5D Index ranged from 0.45 (role) to 0.63 (pain); correlations with EQ-VAS ranged from 0.33 (cognitive) to 0.66 (health perceptions). Correlations between MOS-HIV PHS and MHS with EQ-5D Index were 0.61 and 0.58; and with EQ-VAS, 0.57 and 0.60, respectively. Responsiveness to adverse experiences was highest for MOS-HIV pain and PHS (effect sizes = 0.9 and 0.4); pain had the highest relative precision (2.4) for adverse experiences: EQ-VAS had the greatest relative precision (1.6) for developing an OI. CONCLUSION: In these patients with advanced HIV disease. EQ-5D showed good construct validity, but there may be a ceiling effect for its EQ-5D Index component. EQ-5D was less responsive to adverse events than the MOS-HIV. However, the EQ-VAS was most sensitive to developing an OI and is likely to be a useful measure of HRQOL for generating QALYs in cost-utility studies involving patients with advanced HIV disease.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

PubMed1999

Use of the 12-item short-form (SF-12) Health Survey in an Australian heart and stroke population.

The objective of this study was to validate the SF-12 Health Survey in heart and stroke patients using a community-based study. Between November 1995 and August 1996, 3,362 patients were invited to join the Hunter Heart and Stroke Register in New South Wales, Australia and to complete the SF-12 Health Survey. Of the 3,362 patients, 2,341 (70%) returned the SF-12. Of those 2,341 patients, 78% completed all 12 items. Those who did not complete the questionnaire were significantly more likely to be females, older, less educated, have stayed longer in hospital and been admitted on emergency. The SF-12 demonstrated construct validity in an analysis restricted to the 1,831 patients who completed the questionnaire: scores measuring physical and mental health status were statistically significantly higher in men than women, in younger than older, in those who had shorter than longer lengths of stay in hospital, in patients whose hospital admissions were planned than emergencies and in heart than stroke patients. Construct validity of the SF-12 among patients able to complete the SF-12 suggests considerable potential for its use in assessing health status in large-scale surveys. However, caution should be taken with the heart and stroke population because of a relatively high in completion rate.

Age Distribution↗

PubMed2005

The Bosnian version of the international self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder, the Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale, is reliable and valid in a variety of different adult samples affected by war.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to assess the internal consistency and discriminant and convergent validity of the Bosnian version of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PTDS). The PTDS yields both a PTSD diagnosis according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition (DSM-IV) and a measure of symptom severity. METHODS: 812 people living in Sarajevo or in Banja Luka in Bosnia-Herzegovina, of whom the majority had experienced a high number of traumatic war events, were administered the PTDS and other measures of trauma-related psychopathology. The psychometric properties of the instrument were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and principal components analysis, and its construct validity was assessed via Spearman correlation coefficients with the other instruments. RESULTS: The PTDS and its subscales demonstrated high internal consistency. The principal components revealed by an exploratory analysis are broadly consistent with the DSM-IV subscales except that they reproduce some previously reported difficulties with the "numbing" items from the avoidance subscale. The construct validity of the PTDS was supported by appropriate correlations with other relevant measures of trauma related psychopathology. CONCLUSION: The Bosnian version of the PTDS thus appears to be a time-economic and psychometrically sound measure for screening and assessing current PTSD. This self-report measure awaits further validation by interview methods.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

A ChemoSensory questionnaire for patients treated for cancer of the head and neck.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate primary chemosensory issues experienced by patients who undergo treatment for cancer of the head and neck and to develop and assess a ChemoSensory Questionnaire (CSQ). DESIGN: Cross sectional survey for questionnaire development and testing. METHODS: Literature, expert opinion, and focus group methodology were used to identify aspects of smell and taste affecting patients before, during, and after therapy for cancer of the head and neck. A draft instrument was compiled, reviewed, and revised. The revised instrument was administered along with a demographic and clinical form, the SF-12, the Performance Status Survey, and the University of Michigan Head and Neck Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQOL) to a sample of patients. After item and scale analyses and reductions, a final instrument was assembled. Construct validity and test-retest reliability were assessed. RESULTS: Two hundred six patients were included in the study. The final survey instrument consisted of eight items, four on smell and four on taste. Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 for the smell scale and 0.78 for the taste scale. Correlations with other HRQOL scales ranged from 0.20 to 0.64 for the taste scale and from 0.10 to 0.33 for the smell scale. Good construct validity of the CSQ scores was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment for head and neck cancer negatively impacts smell and taste. A survey instrument was developed to evaluate chemosensory function that is simple to administer and is brief. This instrument will be of value in identifying factors that contribute to chemosensory disturbance and may serve as a guide for planning treatment regimens that minimize such disturbance.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument.

In 1991, the World Health Organization initiated a project to simultaneously develop a quality of life (QOL) instrument in 15 countries: The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument. This was intended as a generic QOL tool for use with patients across varying disease types, severities of illness, and cultural subgroups. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the WHOQOL-100 in the U.S., one of the original 15 participating countries. The WHOQOL is a 100-item self-report instrument consisting of 24 subscales within six domains: Physical, Psychological, Independence, Social, Environment, and Spiritual. Four additional items pertain to overall QOL/health. We tested the WHOQOL-100 (U.S. version) in a sample of 443 adults (n = 251 chronically ill, n = 128 healthy, and n = 64 childbearing) in the U.S. to test its reliability (internal consistency, test-retest), construct validity (convergent, discriminant), responsiveness, and factor structure. The WHOQOL-100 (U.S. version) has acceptable internal consistency (alpha range: 0.82-0.95 across domains) and reproducibility (ICC range: 0.83-0.96 at 2-week retest interval). It is responsive to change in clinical conditions, as evidenced by predicted score change (effect size) in women after childbirth. Construct validity was demonstrated by (1) its correlation with the Short Form-36 and Subjective Quality of Life Profile, and (2) its ability to discriminate between the diverse samples in this study. The conceptual structure was confirmed exactly with the exception of four facets that did not correlate most highly with the domains to which they were originally assigned, but these differences were minor. The WHOQOL measurement system is suitable for evaluating the QOL of adults in the U.S. The psychometric properties will be continually evaluated as more data become available in the U.S.

Adult↗

PubMed1988

Interpersonal style differences among drug abusers.

Interpersonal style differences among drug abusers were explored using Ryan's (1977) typological system of FIRO-B interpretation. One hundred eleven male veteran drug abusers were administered the FIRO-B, along with a battery of psychological tests and a structured interview. The drug abusers were more likely to be categorized as "loners," "rebels," and "pessimists" than was the general population sample. The categories within each FIRO-B dimension (inclusion, control, and affection) were collapsed into three larger subtypes based on general patterns of "expressed" and "wanted" scores within each dimension. The construct validity of the Ryan schema was tested by comparing the three larger groups for each dimension on a series of preselected variables for which differences would be hypothesized from FIRO theory. The results of these analyses were consistent with Ryan's (1977) and Schutz's (1978) theories about interpersonal orientation. The findings of the study provide information about the commonality and heterogeneity of interpersonal style among drug abusers. The findings also support the construct validity of Ryan's typological schema for the FIRO-B.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The Impact of Event Scale--Revised: evaluation of the subscales and correlations to psychophysiological startle response patterns in survivors of a life-threatening cardiac event: an analysis of 129 patients with an implanted cardioverter defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) with special emphasis on the evaluation of the hyperarousal subscale against a standardized psychophysiological measurement. METHODS: A total of 129 survivors of a life-threatening cardiac event underwent a psychodiagnostic evaluation and a psychophysiological acoustic startle reflex (ASR) paradigm. The ASR assessed the magnitude and habituation of electromyogram (EMG) and skin conductance responses (SCR) in response to the delivery of 15 acoustic startle trials. Pearson correlation and factor analysis was used to measure reliability and construct validity. The hyperarousal subscale was validated against the ASR in terms of sensitivity and specificity mainly using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A high reliability was found for the intrusion and avoidance subscale (alpha>0.8); however, the hyperarousal subscale showed a weaker reliability (alpha=0.66). No avoidance item, one intrusion item but four hyperarousal items revealed higher correlations to another than its assigned subscale. The hyperarousal subscale was not able to discriminate sufficiently between patients with and without exaggerated startle reactions as indicated by ROC curves running near the diagonal line. LIMITATIONS: The scores in all three subscales are lower compared to subjects traumatized by non-cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability and construct validity for the intrusion and avoidance subscale proved to be high but was only sufficient for the hyperarousal subscale. Moreover, the criterion validity of the hyperarousal subscale regarding psychophysiological measurements is arguable and indicates further investigations in this area.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2004

Translation, adaptation and validation of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) for an Arab population: the Sfax modified WOMAC.

OBJECTIVE: To translate into Arabic and validate the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) index. METHOD: Arabic translation was obtained with use of the forward and backward translation method. Adaptations were made after a pilot study. Patients with symptomatic knee OA fulfilling the revised criteria of the American College of Rheumatology were included. Impairment outcome measures (pain as measured on a visual analog scale, the maximum distance walked, Kellgren's radiological score), Lequesne index score and Beck depression scale score were recorded. Each item was analyzed. Test-retest reliability was assessed with use of the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct validity was investigated with use of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, and a factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: One hundred and three patients were included in the study. Eight questions of the WOMAC physical function subscale (PF) had insufficient psychometric properties and were excluded. Although test-retest reliability of the questionnaire was good (0.84, 0.84, and 0.92 for pain, stiffness, and modified PF subscales respectively), construct validity could not be demonstrated. Factor analysis of the modified form of the WOMAC extracted four factors, which differed from the a priori triple stratification. However, factor analysis of the modified PF subscales extracted two factors, which accounted for 68.4% of the total variance and could be clinically characterized (disability during activities requiring knee flexion within the first 90 degrees and activities requiring knee flexion over more than 90 degrees ). CONCLUSION: We translated and adapted the WOMAC index into Arabic to suit Tunisian people. The translated questionnaire is reliable but not valid in its original form. We propose the use of a modified version of PF subscale of the WOMAC, although the psychometric properties of this instrument must be examined in a larger population.

Aged↗

PubMed1989

Development of a health questionnaire specific for end-stage renal disease.

To compare the efficacy of various end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapies valid and reproducible probes which measure well-being and are specific for ESRD are necessary. Four studies were undertaken to provide and test these probes. (1) 107 dialysis and 119 transplant recipients were interviewed to determine the prevalence of 24 physical symptoms. (2) A questionnaire was devised using 2 new indexes (a symptom scale derived from the first study using 12 symptoms and an affect scale comprising 12 emotions) and 6 indexes previously used in other chronic illnesses. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility was satisfactory. (3) Construct validity for the questionnaire was shown by interviewing 97 dialysis and 82 transplant patients in whom we hypothesized that physical well-being would be better in transplant patients. After age matching the transplant group was more active, with a higher objective quality of life and fewer physical symptoms than the dialysis group. (4) 63 stable dialysis, 67 stable transplant, 15 dialysis patients successfully transplanted in the intervening year and 5 failed transplanted patients were reinterviewed 1 year later to assess the responsiveness of the questionnaire. In the group who had recently been successfully transplanted both physical, affect and quality of life scores showed a major improvement following transplant. We conclude that this questionnaire is specific for ESRD, examines physical, psychological, and social well-being, is brief, easily administered, reproducible, has construct validity and is responsive to changes in therapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

[The development and Assessment on the general quality of life intrument for Chinese people].

OBJECTIVE: To develop a general quality of life (QOL) instrument for Chinese in accordance with the Chinese culture and to assess its reliability, validity and sensitivity. METHODS: A 35-item QOL questionnaire(QOL-35) was developed with reference to the World Health Organization QOL questionnaire(WHO-100) and the 36-item medical outcomes study on short-form health status(SF-36). Thirty five items were divided into six domains (general, physical, independent, psychological, social, environment) and one item on QOL transition. The reliability of QOL-35 was assessed by a test-retest survey among 127 adults with an interval of 24-72 hours. The internal consistency and validity were evaluated by a survey on 135 adults from outpatients or general population, using QOL-35, WHO-100 and SF-36. The adaptability was assessed by application to 1356 community-based samples in Beijing. RESULTS: (1)Test-retest reliability of QOL-35: weighted Kappa indexes for items were from 0.86 to 1.00. Intraclass correlation coefficients were from 0.68 to 0.94 for domains, and 0.94 for total score. (2) On internal consistency: Cronbach's Alphas were 0.93, 0.97 and 0.89 for QO1-35, WHO-100 and SF-36. (3)On construct validity. The accumulated proportions of variances of the preceding seven factors were 66.5%, 50.3% and 65.3% for QOL-35, WHO-100 and SF-36. (4) On criterion validity. Spearman correlation coefficients of total QOL score of QOL-35 with those of WHO-100 and SF-36 were 0.805 and 0.745. (5)The rates of chronic diseases were 53.1%, 33.1%, 26.4% and 25.1% from first to fourth quantile of the total QOL scores of QOL-35(P<0.05). (6)Cronbach's Alpha was from 0.68 to 0.93 in 135 subjects, and from 0.71 to 0.91 in 1356 individuals of natural population. CONCLUSION: The QOL-35 instrument satisfied test-retest reliability and was highly correlated with WHO-100 and SF-36, having fewer items but better construction validity, better internal consistency, and better discrimination ability. We suggested that QOL-35 be used as a replicable tool to assess quality of life in the Chinese general population.

Adult↗