PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “statement”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,549 records · Page 86Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Classification and grading of chronic venous disease in the lower limbs. A consensus statement. Ad Hoc Committee, American Venous Forum.

Advances in modern technology have made available a large number of both invasive and non-invasive investigations that can provide information not only on the presence, absence or anatomic extent but also quantitation of the abnormalities. It was soon realised that the combinations of presence, absence, extent and severity of reflux and/or obstruction in the deep, superficial or perforating veins are so large that the classification of chronic venous disease would be a major challenge. This challenge has been taken up by the Consensus Committee which met in Maui on 22-26 February 1995. The Consensus that developed is in three parts. Part I deals with a classification system that covers the Clinical picture, the Etiology, the Anatomic distribution and the Pathophysiology (the CEAP Classification). Part II suggests a scoring system intended to be evaluated on patients classified according to the CEAP classification, and Part III provides guidelines on the use of various investigations which according to the current medical literature will aid in the classification. The Consensus Committee has retained the copyright of the document so that it can be made available for reproduction to all interested parties. Reproduction is free provided there is no alteration and it is always reproduced in its entirety. The development of this consensus document is a continuous process. Suggestions for improvement are expected from all involved in the study and management of patients with chronic venous disease. The classification has already been presented and debated at several national and international meetings and plans for an updated version are already in progress.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed1998

Defining the physician's duty to warn: consensus statement of Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform.

Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform was formed to consider the duty of Ontario physicians in circumstances where a patient threatens to kill or cause serious bodily harm to a third party. The panel was concerned about the implications of any duty to inform on the integrity of the physician-patient relationship, particularly with respect to confidentiality. The panel agreed that regulations safeguarding the confidentiality of patient information ought to be changed only if there is a critical reason for doing so, but, after deliberation, the panel members concluded that the need to protect the public from serious risk of harm is a paramount concern that should supersede the duty of confidentiality. The recommendations reported here were endorsed in principle by the panelists and the groups they represented (the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, the Canadian Medical Protective Association, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, the Ontario College of Family Physicians and the Ontario Medical Association) and are being implemented by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

Advisory Committees↗