PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Randomised Controlled Trial”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,567 records · Page 87Linked to original sources

Antioxidants in the treatment of severe pre-eclampsia: an explanatory randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether antioxidant therapy alters the disease process in severe early onset pre-eclampsia, in support of the hypothesis that increased lipid peroxides and reactive oxygen species production-play an important role in the pathogenesis of the disease. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. SETTING: Two tertiary care, referral hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa. PARTICIPANTS: Women with severe pre-eclampsia diagnosed between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation. INTERVENTION: Combined antioxidant treatment with vitamin E (800 IU/day), vitamin C (1000 mg/day), and allopurinol (200 mg/day). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES PRIMARY OUTCOMES: 1. prolongation of pregnancy and 2, biochemical assessment of lipid peroxides and antioxidants. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: data on maternal complications, side effects of treatment, infant outcomes and regular assessment of haematologic and renal parameters. RESULTS: The proportion of women delivered within 14 days in the antioxidant group was 52% (14/27) compared with 76% (22/29) in the placebo group (relative risk 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.45-1.04). One woman in each group had eclampsia. Eleven women (42%) in the antioxidant and 16 (59%) in the placebo group required two antihypertensives for blood pressure control. Trial medications were well tolerated with few side effects. Lipid peroxide levels were not significantly altered in the antioxidant and placebo groups. Serum uric acid levels decreased and vitamin E levels increased significantly. CONCLUSION: The results of this explanatory randomised trial do not encourage the routine use of antioxidants against pre-eclampsia. However, further research with modified strategies such as earlier initiation of therapy or different combinations seem worthwhile.

Adolescent↗

Comparison of effects of amphotericin B deoxycholate infused over 4 or 24 hours: randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that amphotericin B deoxycholate is less toxic when given by continuous infusion than by conventional rapid infusion. DESIGN: Randomised, controlled, non-blinded, single centre study. SETTING: University hospital providing tertiary clinical care. PATIENTS: 80 mostly neutropenic patients with refractory fever and suspected or proved invasive fungal infections. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to receive 0.97 mg/kg amphotericin B by continuous infusion over 24 hours or 0.95 mg/kg by rapid infusion over four hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were evaluated for side effects related to infusion, nephrotoxicity, and mortality up to three months after treatment. Analysis was on an intention to treat basis. RESULTS: Patients in the continuous infusion group had fewer side effects and significantly reduced nephrotoxicity than those in the rapid infusion group. Overall mortality was higher during treatment and after three months' follow up in the rapid infusion than in the continuous infusion group. CONCLUSION: Continuous infusions of amphotericin B reduce nephrotoxicity and side effects related to infusion without increasing mortality.

Adolescent↗

Performance of response criteria for assessing peripheral arthritis in patients with psoriatic arthritis: analysis of data from randomised controlled trials of two tumour necrosis factor inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: In recent clinical trials in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the response criteria and disease activity measures that have been used were those developed for rheumatoid arthritis. However, these have not yet been validated in PsA. OBJECTIVE: To compare the responsiveness and discriminative capacity of the psoriatic arthritis response criteria (PsARC), American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria and the Disease Activity Score (DAS) and core-set measures in patients with PsA and peripheral arthritis, using the data from two randomised placebo-controlled trials of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. METHODS: In an infliximab trial, 104 patients with active PsA were randomised to receive placebo or infliximab for 16 weeks. In an etanercept trial, 60 patients with active PsA were randomised to receive placebo or etanercept for 12 weeks. Data from baseline and the end of the intervention phase were used from each study. Responsiveness was assessed using the standardised response mean and effect size. Capacity to discriminate between the active drug and placebo was assessed using t values or a chi2 test. Measures were ranked in order of their t value or chi2 value. RESULTS: The EULAR criteria performed better in discriminating the active drug from placebo than the ACR20 improvement criteria, which in turn performed better than the PsARC. It was also found that the pooled indices (DAS and DAS28) were generally more responsive, and performed better in discriminating active drug from placebo, than the single core-set measures. CONCLUSION: Response criteria and pooled indices developed for rheumatoid arthritis are useful for the assessment of arthritis in PsA clinical trials.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

Efficacy of artesunate plus pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine for uncomplicated malaria in Gambian children: a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Resistance to cheap effective antimalarial drugs, especially to pyrimethaminesulphadoxine (Fansidar), is likely to have a striking impact on childhood mortality in sub-Sharan Africa. The use of artesunate (artesunic acid) [corrected] in combination with pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine may delay or prevent resistance. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this combined treatment. METHODS: We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in The Gambia. 600 children with acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, aged 6 months to 10 years, at five health centres were randomly assigned pyrimethaminesulphadoxine (25 mg/500 mg) with placebo; pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine plus one dose of artesunate (4mg/kg bodyweight); or pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine plus one dose 4 mg/kg bodyweight artesunate daily for 3 days. Children were visited at home each day after the start of treatment until parasitaemia had cleared. FINDINGS: The combined treatment was well tolerated. No adverse reactions attributable to treatment were recorded. By day 1, only 178 (47%) of 381 children treated with artesunate were still parasitaemic, compared with 157 (81%) of 195 children in the pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine alone group (relative risk 1.7 [95% CI 1.5-2.0], p<0.001). Treatment-failure rates at day 14 were 3.1% in the pyrimethamine sulphadoxine alone group, and 3.7% in the one-dose artesunate group (risk difference -0.6% [-4.2 to 3.0]) and 1.6% in the three-dose group (1.5 [1.5-4.5], p=0.048). Symptoms resolved faster in children who received artesunate, but there was no additional benefit for three doses of artesunate over one dose. Children given artesunate were less likely to be gametocytaemic after treatment. INTERPRETATION: The combined treatment was safe, well tolerated, and effective. The addition of artesunate to malaria treatment regimens in Africa results in lower gametocyte rates and may lower transmission rates.

Animals↗

Neuroprotective treatment with cerebrolysin in patients with acute stroke: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cerebrolysin is a compound with neurotrophic and neuroprotective activity. It is produced by enzymatic breakdown of purified brain proteins and consists of low molecular weight peptides and amino acids. Cellular and animal models of cerebral ischaemia have shown that it is a potent neuroprotective agent. We explored the safety and preliminary outcome of Cerebrolysin treatment in patients with acute stroke. METHODS: Randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial. Patients with acute stroke were randomised within 24 h of stroke onset to IV therapy with placebo or Cerebrolysin 50 mL/day for 21 days. Both groups received concomitant treatment with ASA 250 mg/day PO and pentoxifylline 300 mg/day IV. Clinical examinations were performed on days 1, 3, 7, 21 and 90 post baseline. Outcome measures were the Canadian Neurological Scale, the Barthel Index, the Clinical Global Impressions, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and the Syndrome Short Test. Treatment emergent adverse events, lab tests, and vital signs were recorded to assess the safety of Cerebrolysin. RESULTS: 146 patients were enrolled in two groups: 78 Cerebrolysin and 68 placebo. At baseline, no significant group differences were observed. Patients in the Cerebrolysin group had no significant improvement in the CNS score, the Barthel Index and the Clinical Global Impressions when compared to the placebo group. A significant improvement of cognitive function of the patients on Cerebrolysin was observed in the Syndrome Short Test when compared to the placebo group. Cerebrolysin was well tolerated and safe. Adverse events occurred with a similar frequency in both groups. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that neurotrophic treatment with Cerebrolysin is safe and well tolerated by patients with acute stroke. The findings, despite the small sample size, also indicate a potential treatment effect of Cerebrolysin in acute stroke. Larger studies, however, are needed to confirm and extend these findings.

Aged↗

Hip and non-spine fracture risk reductions differ among antiresorptive agents: Evidence from randomised controlled trials.

A number of antiresorptive agents reduce the risk of vertebral fractures, but few have shown consistent effects on hip and other non-spine fractures. Meta-analysis provides a more precise estimate than individual trials when results are consistent across pooled trials. Earlier meta-analyses summarised the results for vertebral and non-spine fractures. New data have emerged for hormone therapy (HT), alendronate (ALN), risedronate (RIS) and ibandronate (IBN). We surveyed recent reports of randomised, placebo-controlled trials with non-spine and/or hip fracture data, and used meta-analysis where appropriate to test for heterogeneity and derive pooled estimates. The magnitude of effect on hip fracture appears to be similar to that for non-spine fracture for each drug, but differs among drugs. Based on the current data, ALN reduces the risk of hip and non-spine fracture by 49-55%, HT by 25-36% and RIS by 26-27%. There is insufficient and/or inconsistent evidence of an effect on these fractures for IBN, calcitonin and raloxifene.

Aged↗

Low-dose and high-dose acetylsalicylic acid for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. ASA and Carotid Endarterectomy (ACE) Trial Collaborators.

BACKGROUND: Endarterectomy benefits certain patients with carotid stenosis, but benefits are lessened by perioperative surgical risk. Acetylsalicylic acid lowers the risk of stroke in patients who have experienced transient ischaemic attack and stroke. We investigated appropriate doses and the role of acetylsalicylic acid in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. METHODS: In a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial, 2849 patients scheduled for endarterectomy were randomly assigned 81 mg (n=709), 325 mg (n=708), 650 mg (n=715), or 1300 mg (n=717) acetylsalicylic acid daily, started before surgery and continued for 3 months. We recorded occurrences of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death. We compared patients on the two higher doses of acetylsalicylic acid with patients on the two lower doses. FINDINGS: Surgery was cancelled in 45 patients, none were lost to follow-up by 30 days, and two were lost by 3 months. The combined rate of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death was lower in the low-dose groups than in the high-dose groups at 30 days (5.4 vs 7.0%, p=0.07) and at 3 months (6.2 vs 8.4%, p=0.03). In an efficacy analysis, which excluded patients taking 650 mg or more acetylsalicylic acid before randomisation, and patients randomised within 1 day of surgery, combined rates were 3.7% and 8.2%, respectively, at 30 days (p=0.002) and 4.2% and 10.0% at 3 months (p=0.0002). INTERPRETATION: The risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death within 30 days and 3 months of endarterectomy is lower for patients taking 81 mg or 325 mg acetylsalicylic acid daily than for those taking 650 mg or 1300 mg.

Aged↗

The treatment of acute infectious conjunctivitis with fusidic acid: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute infectious conjunctivitis is a common disorder in primary care. Despite a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness of topical antibiotics for the treatment of acute infectious conjunctivitis, most patients presenting in primary care with the condition receive topical antibiotics. In The Netherlands, fusidic acid is most frequently prescribed. AIM: To assess the effectiveness of fusidic acid gel compared to placebo for acute infectious conjunctivitis. DESIGN: Double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Twenty-five Dutch primary care centres. METHOD: Adults presenting with a red eye and either (muco)purulent discharge or glued eyelid(s) were allocated to either one drop of fusidic acid gel 1% or placebo, four times daily during one week. The main outcome measure was the difference in recovery rates at 7 days. Secondary outcome measures were difference in bacterial eradication rates, a survival time analysis of the duration of symptoms, and the difference in recovery rates in culture-positive and culture-negative patients. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-one patients were randomised and 163 patients were analysed. Forty-five of the 73 patients in the treatment and 53 of the 90 patients in the placebo group recovered (adjusted risk difference = 5.3% [95% confidence interval {CI} = -11 to 18]). There was no difference between the median duration of symptoms in the two groups. At baseline, the prevalence of a positive bacterial culture was 32% (58/181). The bacterial eradication rate was 76% in the treatment and 41% in the placebo group (risk difference = 35% [95% CI = 9.3 to 60.4]). In culture positive patients, the treatment effect tended to be strong (adjusted risk difference = 23% [95% CI = -6 to 42]). CONCLUSION: At 7 days, cure rates in the fusidic acid gel and placebo group were similar, but the confidence interval was too wide to clearly demonstrate their equivalence. These findings do not support the current prescription practices of fusidic acid by GPs.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Guidelines and educational outreach visits from community pharmacists to improve prescribing in general practice: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of guidelines with or without one-to-one educational outreach visits by community pharmacists in improving general practice prescribing for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: Cluster randomised trial of 20 general practices within Avon, England. Practices were randomised to three groups: control; mailed guidelines; mailed guidelines plus educational outreach visits. General practitioners (GPs) in the latter group received two one-to-one outreach visits from community pharmacists. Changes in prescribing were measured using outcomes derived from prescribing analysis and cost (PACT) data. The primary outcome measure was change in the volume of prescribing for ibuprofen, diclofenac and naproxen as a percentage of total NSAID prescribing. Six secondary outcomes included other measures of prescribing quality and volume. A cost-benefit analysis was performed. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed for the primary outcome measure: practices receiving outreach visits prescribed only 2.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.8 to 5.0] more of the three recommended NSAIDs than the control practices did and 1.6% (95% CI: -1.4 to 4.7) more than practices that received guidelines only. Following adjustment for multiple comparisons, only one secondary outcome showed a statistically significant difference between the groups: the proportion of prescribing of the five most frequently used drugs was 2.2% (95% CI: 0.9 to 3.6) higher in the educational outreach group compared with the control group. A net increase in costs was shown with both interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Although good prescribing at baseline in the participating practices limited the capacity for improvement, this trial provides no evidence that guidelines with or without educational outreach visits from community pharmacists lead to substantial improvements in prescribing behaviour.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

Efficacy of lipid lowering drug treatment for diabetic and non-diabetic patients: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical benefit of lipid lowering drug treatment in patients with and without diabetes mellitus, for primary and secondary prevention. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane, Medline, Embase, and reference lists up to April 2004. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised, placebo controlled, double blind trials with a follow-up of at least three years that evaluated lipid lowering drug treatment in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted data. The primary outcome was major coronary events defined as coronary heart disease death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or myocardial revascularisation procedures. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included. Lipid lowering drug treatment was found to be at least as effective in diabetic patients as in non-diabetic patients. In primary prevention, the risk reduction for major coronary events was 21% (95% confidence interval 11% to 30%; P < 0.0001) in diabetic patients and 23% (12% to 33%; P = 0.0003) in non-diabetic patients. In secondary prevention, the corresponding risk reductions were 21% (10% to 31%; P = 0.0005) and 23% (19% to 26%; P < or = 0.00001). However, the absolute risk difference was three times higher in secondary prevention. When results were adjusted for baseline risk, diabetic patients benefited more in both primary and secondary prevention. Blood lipids were reduced to a similar degree in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence that lipid lowering drug treatment (especially statins) significantly reduce cardiovascular risk in diabetic and non-diabetic patients is strong and suggests that diabetic patients benefit more, in both primary and secondary prevention. Future research should define the threshold for treatment of these patients and the desired target lipid concentrations, especially for primary prevention.

Coronary Disease↗

Somatostatin in the treatment of acute pancreatitis: a prospective randomised controlled trial.

A prospective study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of somatostatin in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. Seventy one patients were randomised to control (h = 36), or to the somatostatin group (h = 35) who received somatostatin 100 micrograms/h after a 250 microgram bolus for the first two days. The following were compared in the two groups on admission and two days later: laboratory tests of prognostic significance, severity of pancreatitis, and also morbidity and mortality. Of the nine laboratory tests compared, the white blood cell count, lactate dehydrogenase, and urea concentrations were significantly lower in the somatostatin group two days after admission. Severity of pancreatitis after hospitalisation increased in fewer patients given somatostatin (NS). There was a trend toward fewer complications, especially local, in the somatostatin group. Mortality in both groups was low. Somatostatin appeared to reduce the local complications of acute pancreatitis. A larger trial is necessary to show its beneficial effect conclusively.

Acute Disease↗

Randomised, controlled trial of low-dose heparin for prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. The Heparin Prophylaxis Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Fatal pulmonary embolism and other thromboembolic complications are common in hospital inpatients. However, there is little evidence on the routine use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in non-surgical patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose heparin in the prevention of hospital-acquired, clinically relevant, fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. METHODS: Our study used the postrandomisation consent design. 19,751 consecutive patients, aged 55 years or older, admitted to departments of infectious diseases in six Swedish hospitals, were screened for inclusion in the randomised, controlled, unblinded, multicentre trial. Of the eligible patients, 5776 were assigned subcutaneous standard heparin (5000 IU every 12 h) until hospital discharge or for a maximum of 3 weeks; 5917 were assigned no prophylactic treatment (control group). We sought consent only from the heparin group. Follow-up was for 3 weeks after discharge from hospital or for a maximum of 60 days from randomisation. The primary endpoint was necropsy-verified pulmonary embolism of predefined clinical relevance. FINDINGS: By intention-to-treat analysis mortality was similar in the heparin and control groups (5.3 vs 5.6%, p = 0.39) and the median time from admission to death was 16 days in both groups (IQR 8-31 vs 6-28 days). Necropsy-verified pulmonary embolism occurred in 15 heparin-treated and 16 control-group patients. There was a significant difference between heparin and control groups in median time from randomisation to fatal pulmonary embolism (28 [24-36] vs 12.5 [10-20] days, p = 0.007). This difference corresponds to the duration of heparin prophylaxis. Non-fatal thromboembolic complications occurred in more of the control than of the heparin group (116 vs 70, p = 0.0012). INTERPRETATION: Our findings do not support the routine use of heparin prophylaxis for 3 weeks or less in large groups of non-surgical patients. Further studies are needed to investigate whether heparin prophylaxis of longer duration may prevent fatal pulmonary embolism.

Aged↗

A double-blind randomised controlled trial of the effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone density of women taking oestrogen replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone density in women who have had a hysterectomy. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg, 20 mg or placebo as an adjunct to oestrogen therapy. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and twenty-three women, aged 18 to 45 years and currently receiving daily oestrogen, who presented at a university-based rheumatology practice. INTERVENTIONS: The women were randomly assigned to receive either medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg, 20 mg or placebo daily beginning on day 15 of each month for one year. Forty-one women were randomised into each group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measurement was the percentage of change from baseline in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (L2-L4). Secondary outcome measures included differences in femoral neck bone density, cholesterol and triglyceride levels between groups. RESULTS: At one year, change in bone mineral density did not differ between either the treatment or placebo groups. Medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg and 10 mg led to statistically significant reductions in very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, total triglycerides, and very low density lipoprotein triglycerides when compared with placebo. Medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg also led to a statistically significant reduction in high density lipoprotein cholesterol, high density lipoprotein-2 cholesterol, and high density lipoprotein-2 triglycerides. CONCLUSIONS: Medroxyprogesterone acetate at either dose as an adjunct to oestrogen did not improve bone mineral density at one year when compared with placebo. Medroxyprogesterone acetate 10 mg may not adversely affect lipids. Medroxyprogesterone acetate 20 mg, however, did reduce high density lipoprotein cholesterol and therefore may increase cardiovascular risk.

Adolescent↗

Incisional local anaesthesia versus placebo for pain relief after appendectomy in children--a double-blinded controlled randomised trial.

Incisional local anaesthesia is widely used for postoperative pain relief after surgery. We present the results of a double-blinded and randomised controlled study of incisional bupivacaine versus placebo in 68 children undergoing open appendectomy. The trial medicine (0.5 ml/kg) was infiltrated into the subcutis after wound closure. Patients with a weight below 40 kg received a bupivacaine concentration of 0.25 % and the patients above 40 kg a concentration of 0.5 %. During the first 24 hours after surgery the patients in the bupivacaine group received on average 0.065 mg morphine/kg and in the placebo group 0.073 mg/kg. This difference was not statistically significant. The patients in the bupivacaine group tended to experience pain relief for a longer period of time compared to the patients in the placebo group. However, the difference was not significant. In conclusion, the use of subcutaneous infiltration with bupivacaine in the wound after open appendectomy had no significant effect on the use of morphine during the first postoperative day in children.

Adolescent↗

Tranexamic acid reduces early post-operative blood loss after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled trial of 29 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Extensive blood loss related to knee arthroplasty is quite normal and many patients require blood transfusions. Surgery and the use of pneumatic tourniquets lead to an increase in the activity of the fibrinolytic system, which in turn may accentuate the blood loss. Drugs that inhibit the fibrinolytic system may thus be used to reduce blood loss. Tranexamic acid (TA) acts by binding to one of the enzymes at the start of the coagulation cascade, so inhibiting the fibrinolytic system. A concern is that this inhibition may have the side effect of increasing thromboembolic disease, a common complication of joint replacement surgery. We aimed to confirm the reductions in blood loss and to assess the impact of TA usage on clinical and sub-clinical DVT. METHOD: We performed a prospective, randomised, double blind, controlled trial, using patients due to undergo primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Patients were randomised to receive either 15 mg/kg of tranexamic acid or a similar volume of normal saline at the time of cementing of the prosthesis. Perioperative blood loss was recorded and patients were screened for DVT with duplex ultrasound assessment of both legs on the fifth post-operative day. RESULTS: A statistically significant (p=0.006) decrease in blood loss in the early post-operative period was noted in the group receiving tranexamic acid. This was not associated with a significant difference in total blood loss (p=0.55) or in transfusion requirements. There was no of evidence in DVT in either group on duplex ultrasound screening of the lower limbs. INTERPRETATION: One injection of 15 mg/kg of tranexamic given at the time of cementing the prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty, before deflation of the tourniquet, significantly decreases the amount of blood loss in the early post-operative period. The treatment was not associated with an increase in thromboembolic complications.

Aged↗

Copper-salicylate gel for pain relief in osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a copper-salicylate gel in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Rheumatology Clinic of St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales (a tertiary referral hospital), June 1993 to October 1994. PATIENTS: 116 patients with pain associated with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee (diagnosed by criteria of the European League against Rheumatism), drawn from patients attending the Clinic or self-referred after newspaper advertisements. INTERVENTION: Copper-salicylate or placebo gel (1.5 g) applied twice daily to the forearm for four weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-assessment of pain before the trial and after two and four weeks of treatment; patient and investigator assessments of efficacy; additional analgesia required; adverse reactions; and withdrawal rates. RESULTS: Pain scores at rest and on movement decreased in both the copper-salicylate and placebo groups by 13%-20%. There was no significant difference between the two groups for decrease in pain score, patient and investigator efficacy ratings, number of patients requiring paracetamol for extra analgesia (active, 77%; placebo, 71%) and average dose of paracetamol (active, 555 mg/day; placebo, 600 mg/day). Significantly more patients in the copper-salicylate group reported adverse reactions (83% versus 52% of the placebo group), most commonly skin reactions, and withdrew from the trial because of these reactions (17% versus 1.7% of the placebo group). CONCLUSION: Copper-salicylate gel applied to the forearm was no better than placebo gel as pain relief for patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee, but produced significantly more skin rashes.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

Topical adrenaline in the control of intraoperative bleeding in adenoidectomy: a randomised, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of topical racemic adrenaline (RA) (Micronefrin; Bird Products, Palm Springs, CA, USA) in the control of intraoperative bleeding and the prevention of postoperative bleeding, laryngeal spasm and postoperative pain in adenoidectomy among children <6 years of age. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, blinded and placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Kanta-Hame Central Hospital, a district referral center in Finland. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 93 children undergoing outpatient adenoidectomy. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to receive topical gauze sponges soaked in either 1:500 RA or 0.9% sodium chloride (physiological saline) for 3 min after adenoidectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Amount of intraoperative bleeding (surgeons' subjective estimate), need for additional packings, need for electrocautery, laryngeal spasm, postoperative bleeding and pain, duration of procedure and duration of patients' stay in the operation room (OR). RESULTS: Adrenaline significantly decreased surgeons' subjective estimate of the amount of intraoperative bleeding (proportion of patients with significant decrease 67 versus 21%, P < 0.001), reduced the mean number of packings needed (0.6 versus 1.2, P < 0.001) and use of electrocautery (22 versus 45%, P = 0.015), and shortened the mean duration of the procedure (13 versus 18 min, P = 0.043) and the mean stay in the OR (31 versus 35 min, P = 0.058). The impact of adrenaline was even more pronounced among patients with extensive adenoids and/or profuse intraoperative bleeding. A slight elevation of heart rate was observed more often in the adrenaline group (P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Use of topical adrenaline can be recommended in adenoidectomy among children. It helps control the intraoperative bleeding, reduces the use of electrocautery and shortens the durations of procedure and stay in the OR.

Adenoidectomy↗

Randomised controlled trial of ketorolac in the management of corneal abrasions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) in the management of corneal abrasions with respect to symptoms and healing. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective, single center, randomised, placebo controlled, double-blinded trial. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with non-infective, non-contact lens related traumatic or foreign body removal related corneal abrasions were recruited to this study. They were randomised into two groups. Both groups were given a single instillation of Gutt. cyclopentolate 0.5% followed by chloramphenicol eye ointment four times a day until the following day. In addition, the treatment group received topical Ketorolac trometamol 0.5% ophthalmic solution while the control group received placebo Liquifilm tears. Patients were assessed at presentation and about twenty-four hours later for subjective symptoms, abrasion size and any associated complications. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the two groups at base line and twenty-four hour follow-up when assessed for five subjective symptoms of pain, photophobia, grittiness, watering and blurring of vision. However, those receiving topical ketorolac required significantly less additional oral analgesics (p=0.001). There was no difference in the rate of healing. CONCLUSION: Use of topical ketorolac may be a useful adjunct in the management of corneal abrasions.

Administration, Topical↗