PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “COMMON BILE DUCT”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources

Why does laparoscopic common bile duct exploration fail?

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for choledocholithiasis carries an overall ductal clearance rate of between 85% and 95%. We present our single institute experience with LCBDE. Between July 1999 and July 2003, 60 patients (42 females, 18 males; median age, 59.5 years) with proven choledocholithiasis underwent LCBDE for common bile duct (CBD) clearance. The method failed to clear the CBD in six patients, resulting in a 90% overall success rate. Conversion to a conventional open approach (n = 1), hand-assisted LCBDE (n = 1), T-tube placement followed by multiple postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP; n = 2), and endobiliary stent placement followed by single successful postoperative ERCP in each case (n = 2) were chosen as treatment options when the laparoscopic method failed to clear the CBD. LCBDE is a feasible and safe method of managing CBD stones. Impacted stones at the lower end of the CBD or in the ampulla of Vater represent the most likely factors leading to failure of LCBDE. Laparoscopic endobiliary stent placement followed by postoperative ERCP represents the most attractive alternative in these difficult cases of impacted stones.

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde↗

[Retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy (ES) in the diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct (CBD) lithiasis].

The common bile duct (CBD) stones often gives real difficulties of diagnosis and treatment. The ultrasound (US) does not offer in a significant percentage of cases certain diagnostic data, and the unconventional imaging techniques such as computer tomography (CT) are yet less accessible. ERCP appeared in the last period as an optional method for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones, and, moreover, permitted the development of the nonsurgical treatment possibilities. ES and the extraction of stones revealed in this frame as preferable, especially in the high surgical risk cases. This study presents the results of ERCP performed in 547 and the therapeutic value of ES in 284 cases with CBD stones (conclusions of the ERCP and ES used in the clinical practice, in our clinic, in the last three years). In 81.69% cases ES managed the dezobstruction of the CBD, with a frequency of complications of 4.33% and a related mortality rate of 0.78%.

Adult↗