PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Discrimination, Psychological”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 163 records · Page 9Linked to original sources
PubMed1962

The effect of two schedules of primary and conditioned reinforcement.

Of 23 pigeons, 11 received continuous reinforcement for key pecking, and 12 received an FR 10 schedule of reinforcement. The birds were then tested without food, but with potential conditioned reinforcers presented either on the same schedule as in training, on the other schedule, or not at all. Each bird in the subgroup trained on CRF and tested with S(r)'s at FR 10 not only gave more responses in testing than did each bird in both subgroups receiving no S(r)'s, but also gave more responses than did each bird in the S(r) subgroup receiving CRF training and S(r)'s at CRF. Cumulative records are presented to show the effects of different schedules of conditioned reinforcers.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Measuring the psychological construct of control. Discriminant, divergent, and incremental validity of the Shapiro Control Inventory and Rotter's and Wallstons' Locus of Control Scales.

The psychological construct of control is increasingly thought to be an important variable in psychosomatic medicine, but there are limitations with how it has been measured by previous instruments. The current study details four limitations of previous instruments as a rationale for developing a new multi-faceted, multi-dimensional instrument to measure control, the Shapiro Control Inventory (SCI). Discriminant, divergent, and incremental validity of the SCI is compared with the Rotter's Internal/External Locus of Control Scale and Wallstons' Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scales on five groups, one normal and four clinical groups (depression, generalized anxiety disorder, borderline personality, and panic disorder). Analysis of variance showed significant differences among populations on each of the nine SCI scales. The majority of these results were highly significant, whereas for Rotter's scale the results were barely significant, and for Wallstons' three scales, not at all significant. Correlations of the SCI scales with Rotter's and Wallstons' scales were small to moderate, but in no case explained more than 15% of the variance. The SCI also provided incremental validity over Rotter's and Wallstons' scales both for sensitivity (clinical versus normal) and specificity (between clinical groups). The discussion section provides suggestions for future research.

Adolescent↗